Clinical Utility of BRAF, NRAS, and TERT Promoter Mutation in Preoperative Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy: A Diagnostic Study From Dharmais Cancer Hospital

Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma, A Study of BRAF V600E and TERT Promoter Mutations

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to determine the role of BRAF V600E and TERT mutations in the incidence of neck lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study, involving PTC patients at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta. Data were obtained retrospectively based on medical records, except for BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations. Tumor tissue specimens of PTC's patients were transferred to the Integrated Laboratory of Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia. BRAF gene multiplication was performed with KOD One PCR Master Mix (Toyobo KMM-201), while TERT gene multiplication was performed with PCR Master Mix. Data analysis was performed with SPSS version 20. The data were analyzed using univariate and bivariate analysis with the Chi-Square test.

RESULT

42 PTC patients were included in the study; 19 (45%) had BRAF mutation, 20 (48%) had TERT mutation, and 20 (48%) had LN metastases. BRAF V600E mutation was associated with LN metastasis [p<0.001, OR = 25.33 (95% CI 4.92 - 130.34)], while TERT mutation was not. Patients with BRAF+ and TERT- mutations were 18.00 times (95% CI 2.01 - 161.05) more likely to develop LN metastasis than patients with BRAF- and TERT-. Furthermore, the presence of TERT mutation along with BRAF mutation increased the risk to 60.00 (95% CI 4.72 - 763.04) higher than patients with BRAF- and TERT-.

CONCLUSION

BRAF mutation was associated with LN metastasis in PTC patients, but not TERT mutations. However, the presence of TERT mutation in PTC's patients with BRAF mutation increased the risk of LN metastasis.

The value of Korean, American, and Chinese ultrasound risk stratification systems combined with BRAF(V600E) mutation for detecting papillary thyroid carcinoma in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of Korean, American, and Chinese ultrasound risk stratification systems combined with BRAF(V600E) mutation in the detection of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC)within cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (CITNs).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study encompassed 511 CITNs selected from 509 patients between January 2020 and July 2023.Each nodule underwent surgical treatment and was classified according to three distinct systems. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted using histopathological diagnosis as the reference standard, and diagnostic performance was compared.

RESULTS

The three ultrasound stratification systems showed an elevated malignant risk with increasing grades (all P for trend2 < 0.001). The cut-off values for Korean, American, and Chinese systems were 5, 5, and 4c, and their respective area under the curves (AUCs) were 0.735, 0.778, and 0.783.The combination of BRAF (V600E) mutation significantly enhanced the diagnostic efficacy for the Korean(0.773vs0.735, P < 0.001), American (0.809vs0.778, P < 0.001) and Chinese (0.815vs0.783, P < 0.001) stratification systems in distinguishing CITNs without compromising specificity. When the three stratification systems were applied individually or combined with BRAF (V600E) mutation, the AUCs of the American and Chinese systems were similar (all P > 0.05), both of which were higher than the AUC of the Korean system (all P < 0.05). The American system exhibited higher specificity compared to the Chinese and Korean systems (all P < 0.001), whereas the Chinese system demonstrated higher sensitivity and accuracy when compared to the American and Korean systems (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Korean, American and Chinese stratification systems present potential in the differential diagnosis of CITNs. BRAF (V600E) mutation can significantly improve the detection rate of malignant nodules within CTNs, particularly PTC. Notably, the American and Chinese systems demonstrate superior overall diagnostic performance among these systems.

Profile of BRAFV600E, BRAFK601E, NRAS, HRAS, and KRAS Mutational Status, and Clinicopathological Characteristics of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in Indonesian National Referral Hospital

INTRODUCTION

BRAFV600E and RAS mutations are the most common gene mutations in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) that may be correlated with its biological behavior. There are still limited data about BRAFV600E and RAS mutations in Indonesia. This study aims to determine the prevalence of BRAFV600E and RAS mutations, and their association with clinicopathologic characteristics.

METHODS

Patients who had total thyroidectomy from 2019 to 2021 and those who met our study criteria underwent PCR and DNA sequencing analysis for BRAFV600E, BRAFK601E, exon 2 and 3 of NRAS, HRAS, and KRAS. Analyses were performed to determine the associations of BRAFV600E and RAS mutations with clinicopathologic characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 172 PTC patients, BRAFV600E mutation was observed in 37.8% of the patients and RAS mutations were found in 21.5%. One patient harbored BRAFK601E mutation. There was a significant association of BRAFV600E with a high-stage (p = 0.033, OR: 3.279; 95% CI: 1.048-10.259), tall-cell variants (p ≤0.001, OR: 41.143; 95% CI: 11.979-141.308), non-encapsulated (p = 0.001, OR: 4.176; 95% CI: 2.008-8.685), lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.043, OR: 1.912; 95% CI: 1.018-3.592), extrathyroidal extension (p = <0.001, OR: 3.983; 95% CI: 1.970-8.054), and lymph node metastasis (p = 0.009, OR: 2.301; 95% CI: 1.224-4.326). Follicular variant (p = 0.001, OR: 7.011; 95% CI: 2.690-18.268), encapsulated (p = 0.017, OR: 2.433; 95% CI: 1.161-5.100), and absent of extrathyroidal extension (p = 0.033, OR: 2.890; 95% CI: 1.052-7.940) were associated with RAS mutations.

CONCLUSION

A significant association between BRAFV600E mutation and high clinical stage, tall-cell variants, non-encapsulated morphology, lymphovascular invasion, extrathyroidal extension, and lymph node metastasis in PTC was observed. RAS mutations were associated with the follicular variant, encapsulated tumor, and no extrathyroidal extension. HRAS-mutated PTC frequently exhibited tumor multifocality.

BRAFV600E mutation test on fine-needle aspiration specimens of thyroid nodules: Clinical correlations for 4600 patients

Background

The BRAF^V600E mutation is valuable for the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). However, studies related to this mutation have involved only a small number of patients. Therefore, we performed a large‐scale analysis from a single institute to evaluate the accuracy of combined fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) and BRAF^V600E mutation tests for PTC diagnosis.

Methods

A total of 4600 patients with thyroid nodules who underwent both FNA cytology and BRAF^V600E mutation analysis on FNA specimens were enrolled. The association between the BRAF^V600E mutation and clinicopathological features was analyzed. A separate analysis was performed for the 311 patients who underwent repeated FNA for comparison of cytological evaluation and BRAF^V600E mutation results. The diagnostic efficacy of the BRAF^V600E mutation test and cytologic diagnoses was evaluated for 516 patients who underwent preoperative FNA tests in comparison with conclusive postoperative histopathologic results.

Results

The cytology results of all 4600 FNA samples were categorized according to The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) stages I–VI, which accounted for 11.76%, 60.02%, 6.46%, 3.61%, 6.71%, and 11.43% of the samples, respectively. The BRAF^V600E mutation was detected in 762 (16.57%) FNA samples, with rates of 1.48%, 0.87%, 20.20%, 3.01%, 66.02%, and 87.81% for TBSRTC I–VI lesions, respectively. Among the 311 repeat FNA cases, 81.0% of the BRAF^V600E‐positive and 4.3% of the BRAF^V600E‐negative specimens with an initial indication of cytological non‐malignancy were ultimately diagnosed as malignant by repeat FNA (p < 0.001). Among the 516 patients who underwent thyroidectomy, the sensitivity and specificity of the BRAF^V600E mutation test alone for PTC diagnosis were 76.71% and 100.0%, respectively, which increased to 96.62% and 88.03%, respectively, when combining the BRAF^V600E mutation test with cytology. BRAF^V600E mutation was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001), but not with age, gender, or tumor size.

Conclusions

The BRAF^V600E mutation test in FNA samples has potential to reduce false negatives in PTC diagnosis, and therefore plays an important role in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules, especially those with an indeterminate or nondiagnostic cytology, which should be considered for repeat FNA.

Molecular analysis of fine-needle aspiration cytology in thyroid disease: where are we?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The prevalence of thyroid nodules in the general population is high but only about 5% are malignant lesions. Cytology is usually appropriate to rule out malignancy in sonographically suspicious nodules but in many cases, reports are indeterminate. Molecular testing is a more recent approach to rule out malignancy and guide subsequent management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although several different molecular testing approaches have proven useful in reducing unnecessary surgery, there are still several remaining issues, such as the possible occurrence of RAS mutations (which are difficult to interpret in clinical management) and the role of molecular analysis in specific histotypes, such as Hürthle cell carcinomas. Furthermore, conclusive evidence is lacking regarding the cost-effectiveness and appropriateness of surgical options following molecular tests.

SUMMARY

To be useful in clinical practice, molecular tests should be applied to appropriate candidates. In truly uncertain thyroid nodules in which diagnostic surgery may be considered, molecular testing may change the clinical approach and 'save' a number of thyroids.