Radiological and Clinical Outcomes of Balloon Kyphoplasty versus Radiofrequency Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures

Incidence and Risk Factors for Complications and Mortality After Vertebroplasty or Kyphoplasty in the Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture-Analysis of 1,932 Cases From the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose was to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for complications associated with vertebroplasty (VP) or kyphoplasty (KP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database.

METHODS

A cohort of patients undergoing VP/KP was constructed from the 2011-2013 ACS-NSQIP dataset using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. The incidences of minor complications (i.e. urinary tract infection, pneumonia, renal insufficiency, superficial infection, wound dehiscence), major complications (i.e. reoperation, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, sepsis, dialysis, cardiac arrest, deep infection, stroke), and mortality within 30 days post-surgery were investigated, and their risk factors were assessed using logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

Of 1932 patients undergoing VP/KP, 166 (8.6%) experienced a complication, including minor complications in 53 (2.7%), major complications in 95 (4.9%), and death in 40 (2.1%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) of mortality was significantly associated with ASA 4: 16.604 (1.956-140.959) and increased creatinine (≥ 1.3 mg/dL): 3.494 (1.128-10.823). History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was associated with minor complications. Increased WBC count and hypoalbuminemia (<3.0 g/dL) were also associated with major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The major complication and mortality rates associated with VP/KP were 4.9% and 2.1% respectively, higher than previous reports. Increased creatinine and ASA 4 were independently associated with mortality after VP/KP. Therefore, cautious monitoring and counseling is needed for elderly, patients with preexisting kidney disease or ASA 4 undergoing VP/KP.

Comparison Between 7 Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Treatments: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Vertebroplasty (VP), kyphoplasty (KP), SpineJack system (SJ), radiofrequency kyphoplasty (RFK), Kiva system (Kiva), Sky kyphoplasty system (SK), and conservative treatment are widely used in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). However, it is still unknown which is the best intervention. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of VP, KP, SJ, RFK, Kiva, SK, and CT in the treatment of OVCFs.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing VP, KP, SJ, RFK, Kiva, SK, or CT for the treatment of OVCFs were identified on the basis of databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Springer Link. A network meta-analysis was performed using STATA 15.1.

RESULTS

A total of 56 studies with 6974 patients and 7 interventions were included in this study. The results of the surface under the cumulative probability demonstrated that SK was the best intervention in decreasing VAS scores and recovering middle vertebral height, RFK was the best intervention in improving ODI scores and decreasing incidence of new fractures, SJ was the best intervention to restore kyphosis angle, and Kiva was the best intervention to reduce incidence of bone cement leakage. Cluster analysis showed that SK was the preferable intervention on the basis of the outcomes of VAS, ODI, middle vertebral height, and kyphotic angle, and RFK was the preferable treatment in decreasing the incidence of adverse events. In our network meta-analysis, node-splitting analysis and loop inconsistency analysis showed no significant inconsistencies.

CONCLUSIONS

SK may be the most effective treatment in relieving pain, improving the quality of life, and recovering vertebral body height and kyphotic angle, while RFK may be the safest intervention for OVCFs. However, considering the limitations of this study, more high-quality trials are needed in the future to confirm the current conclusion.