Patient Satisfaction in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Effect of psoas muscle index on early postoperative outcomes in surgically treated spinal tumours in an Asian population

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia has been purported to be a pre-operative risk factor that affects patient outcomes in oncological surgery, but no study as of yet has investigated the effect of sarcopenia in patients with spinal tumours. Psoas muscle measurements, including the psoas muscle index (PMI), are an objective way to determine sarcopenia.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated if PMI could predict post-operative outcomes (length of hospital stay and post-operative complications) in surgically treated spinal tumour patients in a multi-ethnic Asian population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with spinal tumours who underwent surgery at our tertiary institution from January 2016 to January 2020. PMI was measured on T2-weighted MRI sequences, at the middle of the L3 vertebral body and measurements were collected by 2 independent raters. The primary outcome was length of hospital stay (LOS), and the secondary outcome was post-operative complications. ROC curve was used to attain the cut-off value for PMI and the population was then stratified into 2 groups; sarcopenic if PMI was less than 1.22 and non-sarcopenic if the PMI value was more than or equal to 1.22. Multivariable linear regression was used for LOS, while multivariate logistic regression was used for complications.

RESULTS

57 patients were included with a mean length of stay of 17.8 days (SD 25.1) and the total number of patients with complications were 20 (35.1 %). Mean LOS was significantly higher in the sarcopenic group compared to the non-sarcopenic group. Univariate analysis confirmed the association of lower psoas muscle index corresponding with longer lengths of stay and this was corroborated in a multivariable linear regression model. There were no significant associations between PMI and postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower PMI values were significantly associated with a longer LOS. PMI may be warranted for risk stratifying Asian spinal tumour patients undergoing surgery.

What Preoperative Factors Are Associated With Achieving a Clinically Meaningful Improvement and Satisfaction After Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative factors associated with clinically meaningful improvement, patient satisfaction and expectation fulfilment at 2 years follow-up in patients undergoing single-level TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a primary, single-level TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis between 2006 and 2015 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional spine registry. Baseline characteristics and PROMs including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short-Form Physical Component Score (SF-36 PCS), Mental Component Score (SF-36 MCS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) back pain, and VAS leg pain were collected preoperatively, at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 997 patients were included. Multivariate analyses showed that increasing age (OR 1.039, P < .001) and better preoperative ODI (OR .984, P = .018) were associated with achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for VAS Back. Increasing age (OR 1.032, P = .007) and better preoperative VAS Back (OR .783, P < .001) were associated with achieving MCID for VAS Leg. Lower BMI (OR .952, P = .024) and better preoperative ODI (OR .976, P < .001) were associated with achieving MCID for SF-36 PCS. Importantly, a better preoperative SF-36 MCS was associated with MCID attainment for ODI (OR 1.038, P < .001), satisfaction (OR 1.034, P < .001) and expectation fulfilment (OR 1.024, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patients who were older, have less preoperative disability and better preoperative mental health were significantly more likely to attain clinically meaningful improvement in PROMs and postoperative satisfaction after single-level TLIF. Identification of these factors would aid surgeons in patient selection and surgical counselling for single-level TLIF.

Exploring the Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane (TLIP) Block as a Novel Approach for Improved Pain Management After Spine Surgery: A Comparative Review

Postoperative pain management following spine surgery remains a significant challenge, often requiring multimodal approaches to achieve adequate analgesia while minimizing side effects. The thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block has emerged as a novel regional anesthesia technique for addressing this issue. By targeting the interfascial plane between the erector spinae and quadratus lumborum muscles at the thoracolumbar junction, the TLIP block aims to provide targeted analgesia to the surgical site while reducing systemic opioid requirements. This review explores the anatomy, technique, mechanism of action, and clinical evidence supporting the TLIP block for post-spine surgery pain management. Additionally, it compares the TLIP block with traditional pain management approaches and discusses its implications for clinical practice and future research. Overall, the TLIP block shows promise as an effective and potentially safer alternative for post-spine surgery pain management, potentially improving patient outcomes and enhancing recovery. Further research is warranted to optimize its utilization and comprehensively evaluate its long-term effects.

Is Upper Extremity or Lower Extremity Function More Important for Patient Satisfaction? An Analysis of 24-Month Outcomes from the QOD Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Cohort

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter registry.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether upper or lower limb mJOA improvement more strongly associates with patient satisfaction after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) is commonly used to assess functional status in patients with CSM. Patients present with upper and/or lower extremity dysfunction, and it is unclear whether improvement in one and/or both symptoms drives postoperative patient satisfaction.

METHODS

This study utilizes the prospective Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) CSM data set. Clinical outcomes included mJOA and North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction. The upper limb mJOA score was defined as upper motor plus sensory mJOA, and the lower limb mJOA as lower motor plus sensory mJOA. Ordered logistic regression was used to determine whether upper or lower limb mJOA was more closely associated with NASS satisfaction, adjusting for other covariates.

RESULTS

Overall, 1141 patients were enrolled in the QOD CSM cohort. In all, 780 had both preoperative and 24-month mJOA scores, met inclusion criteria, and were included for analysis. The baseline mJOA was 12.1±2.7, and postoperatively, 85.6% would undergo surgery again (NASS 1 or 2, satisfied). Patients exhibited mean improvement in both upper (baseline:3.9±1.4 vs. 24 mo:5.0±1.1, P<0.001) and lower limb mJOA (baseline:3.9±1.4 vs. 24 mon:4.5±1.5, P<0.001); however, the 24-month change in the upper limb mJOA was greater (upper:1.1±1.6 vs. lower:0.6±1.6, P<0.001). Across 24-month NASS satisfaction, the baseline upper and lower limb mJOA scores were similar (pupper=0.28, plower=0.092). However, as satisfaction decreased, the 24-month change in upper and lower limb mJOA decreased as well (pupper<0.001, plower<0.001). Patients with NASS scores of 4 (lowest satisfaction) did not demonstrate significant differences from baseline in upper or lower limb mJOA (P>0.05). In ordered logistic regression, NASS satisfaction was independently associated with upper limb mJOA improvement (OR=0.81; 95% CI: 0.68-0.97; P=0.019) but not lower limb mJOA improvement (OR=0.84; 95% CI: 0.70-1.0; P=0.054).

CONCLUSIONS

As the magnitude of upper and lower mJOA improvement decreased postoperatively, so too did patient satisfaction with surgical intervention. Upper limb mJOA improvement was a significant independent predictor of patient satisfaction, whereas lower limb mJOA improvement was not. These findings may aid preoperative counseling, stratified by patients' upper and lower extremity treatment expectations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level-III.

Treatment Concept and Technical Considerations of Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Decompression is a major component of surgical procedures for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). In addition to sufficient decompression to guarantee the relief of neurological pain, compensating surgical instability after wider laminectomy and foraminotomy and instrumentation with caging and fusion with grafting are performed to secure or restore the foraminal dimension and correct coronal/sagittal imbalance for longer survival of the adjacent segment. Endoscopic spinal surgery (ESS) has been developed under the flag of successful decompression while preserving structural integrity as much as possible with the help of magnification and illumination. ESS provides a technical possibility and feasibility for solving LSS by decompression alone. Recently, many endoscopic trials have been conducted to overcome conventional surgical treatment that requires wider dissection, escape inevitable complications from surgical damage, and compensate for the fusion technique. However, biportal ESS has some technical limitations, including clinical difficulties in accessibility for more moderate to severe stenosis and challenges for complicated conditions with segmental ventral slip, isthmic defect, stenosis combined with foraminal stenosis or foraminal disk rupture, or degenerative segmental scoliosis with disk height collapsing and endplate fatigue fracture. Because decompression alone is a skill for eliminating pathologies, there is no function of preserving degenerative structure or stopping the recurrence of disk degeneration or subsidence. This review of clinical reports investigated the possibility of biportal ESS for treating degenerative lumbar disorders by sufficient decompression and adequate elimination of various pathologies and decreasing technical complications. The results of this study may help develop better innovative spinal surgical techniques in the near future.

Preoperative risk factors for nonsatisfaction after lumbar interbody fusion

Introduction

Low back pain (LBP) is a common cause of impaired quality of life and disability and studies regarding surgical management of patients with LBP show a high variation in patient-reported success rate.

Research question

To find valuable preoperative clinical risk factors and variables associated with a non-satisfactory patient-reported outcome following surgery.

Materials and methods

The Danish surgical spine database (DaneSpine) was used to collect eight years of pre- and postoperative data on patients undergoing single-level fusions with either posterior- (PLIF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF). The primary outcome was patient nonsatisfaction. We collected data on European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, pain intensity, duration of back pain, previous discectomy, and expectations regarding return to work after surgery at 2-year follow-up.

Results

The cohort included 453 patients of which 19% reported treatment nonsatisfaction. The nonsatisfaction group demonstrated higher preoperative VAS scores for back pain (75 ± 19 vs. 68 ± 21, p = 0.006) and leg pain (65 ± 25 vs. 58 ± 28, p = 0.004). The preoperative EQ-5D score was significantly lower in the nonsatisfaction group (0.203 + 0.262 vs. 0.291 ± 0.312, p = 0.016). There was no statistical significance between patient nonsatisfaction and preoperative ODI score, age, body mass index, duration of back pain or expectations regarding return to work after surgery.

Discussion and conclusion

Low preoperative EQ-5D scores and high VAS leg and back pain scores were statistically significant with patient nonsatisfaction following surgery and may prove to be valuable tools in the preoperative screening and alignment of patient expectations.

Impact of American Society of Anesthesiologists' Classification on Postoperative Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression: Cohort-Matched Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement, and postoperative satisfaction following minimally invasive lumbar decompression in patients stratified by American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Some guidelines recommend against performing elective procedures for patients with an ASA score of 3 or greater; however, long-term postoperative outcomes are not well described.

METHODS

Primary, single-level, minimally invasive lumbar decompression procedures were identified. PROMs were administered at preoperative, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year timepoints and included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function, visual analog scale (VAS) back/leg, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and 12-item short form physical component score. Satisfaction scores were collected postoperatively for VAS back/leg, ODI, and individual ODI subcategories. Patients were grouped (ASA<3, ASA≥3), and propensity scores were matched to control for significant differences. Demographic and perioperative characteristics were compared using χ 2 and the Student's t test. Mean PROMs and postoperative satisfaction were compared at each time point by a 2-sample t test. Postoperative PROM improvement from the preoperative baseline within each cohort was calculated with a paired t test. MCID achievement was determined by comparing ΔPROMs to established thresholds and comparing between groups using simple logistic regression.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-nine propensity-matched patients were included: 99 ASA<3 and 30 ASA≥3. No significant demographic differences were observed between groups. ASA≥3 patients experienced significantly increased length of stay and postoperative narcotic consumption on surgery day ( P <0.048, all). Mean PROMs and MCID achievement did not differ. The ASA<3 cohort significantly improved from the preoperative baseline for all PROMs at all postoperative time points. ASA<3 patients demonstrated higher levels of postoperative satisfaction at 6 weeks for VAS leg, VAS back, ODI, sleeping, lifting, walking, standing, sex, travel, and at 6 months for VAS back ( P <0.045, all).

CONCLUSION

ASA≥3 patients may achieve similar long-term clinical outcomes to ASA<3 patients, though they may show poorer short-term satisfaction for disability, leg pain, and back pain, which could be related to differing preoperative expectations.

Emerging Need for PROMs to Measure the Impact of Spine Disorders on Overall Health and Well-being: Measuring Expectations as an Example for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Background: Assessing the impact of spine disorders such as lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) on overall health is a component of quality of care that may not be comprehensively captured by spine-specific and single-attribute patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Purpose: We sought to compare PROMs to the Lumbar Surgery Expectations Survey ("Expectations Survey"), which addresses multiple aspects of health and well-being, and to compare the relevance of surgeon-selected versus survey-selected Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) items to LDS. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 379 patients with LDS preoperatively completed the Expectations Survey, Numerical Rating Pain Scales, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and PROMIS computer-adaptive physical function, pain, and mental health surveys. Expectations Survey scores were compared to PROMs with correlation coefficients (indicating strengths of relationships) and probability values (indicating associations by chance). Surgeons reviewed physical function questions to identify those particularly relevant to LDS. Results: Patients' mean age was 67 years, 64% were women, and 83% had single-level and 17% had multiple-level LDS. Probability values between the Expectations Survey and PROMs were reliable, but strengths of relationships were only mild to moderate, indicating PROMs did not comprehensively capture the impact of LDS. None of the surgeon-selected PROMIS physical function questions were posed to patients. Conclusion: This cross-sectional study found PROMs to be reliably associated but not strongly correlated with the Expectations Survey, which addresses the whole-patient impact of LDS. New measures that complement PROMIS and ODI should be developed to capture the whole-person effects of LDS and permit attribution of LDS treatments to overall health.

Personalized Interventional Surgery of the Lumbar Spine: A Perspective on Minimally Invasive and Neuroendoscopic Decompression for Spinal Stenosis

Pain generator-based lumbar spinal decompression surgery is the backbone of modern spine care. In contrast to traditional image-based medical necessity criteria for spinal surgery, assessing the severity of neural element encroachment, instability, and deformity, staged management of common painful degenerative lumbar spine conditions is likely to be more durable and cost-effective. Targeting validated pain generators can be accomplished with simplified decompression procedures associated with lower perioperative complications and long-term revision rates. In this perspective article, the authors summarize the current concepts of successful management of spinal stenosis patients with modern transforaminal endoscopic and translaminar minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques. They represent the consensus statements of 14 international surgeon societies, who have worked in collaborative teams in an open peer-review model based on a systematic review of the existing literature and grading the strength of its clinical evidence. The authors found that personalized clinical care protocols for lumbar spinal stenosis rooted in validated pain generators can successfully treat most patients with sciatica-type back and leg pain including those who fail to meet traditional image-based medical necessity criteria for surgery since nearly half of the surgically treated pain generators are not shown on the preoperative MRI scan. Common pain generators in the lumbar spine include (a) an inflamed disc, (b) an inflamed nerve, (c) a hypervascular scar, (d) a hypertrophied superior articular process (SAP) and ligamentum flavum, (e) a tender capsule, (f) an impacting facet margin, (g) a superior foraminal facet osteophyte and cyst, (h) a superior foraminal ligament impingement, (i) a hidden shoulder osteophyte. The position of the key opinion authors of the perspective article is that further clinical research will continue to validate pain generator-based treatment protocols for lumbar spinal stenosis. The endoscopic technology platform enables spine surgeons to directly visualize pain generators, forming the basis for more simplified targeted surgical pain management therapies. Limitations of this care model are dictated by appropriate patient selection and mastering the learning curve of modern MIS procedures. Decompensated deformity and instability will likely continue to be treated with open corrective surgery. Vertically integrated outpatient spine care programs are the most suitable setting for executing such pain generator-focused programs.

Diffusion basis spectrum imaging predicts long-term clinical outcomes following surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

A major shortcoming in improving care for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients is the lack of robust quantitative imaging tools to guide surgical decision-making. Diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI), an advanced diffusion-weighted MRI technique, provides objective assessments of white matter tract integrity that may help prognosticate outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for CSM.

PURPOSE

To examine the ability of DBSI to predict clinically important CSM outcome measures at 2-years follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Prospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients undergoing decompressive cervical surgery for CSM.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Neurofunctional status was assessed by the mJOA, MDI, and DASH. Quality-of-life was measured by the SF-36 PCS and SF-36 MCS. The NDI evaluated self-reported neck pain, and patient satisfaction was assessed by the NASS satisfaction index.

METHODS

Fifty CSM patients who underwent cervical decompressive surgery were enrolled. Preoperative DBSI metrics assessed white matter tract integrity through fractional anisotropy, fiber fraction, axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity. To evaluate extra-axonal diffusion, DBSI measures restricted and nonrestricted fractions. Patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated preoperatively and up to 2-years follow-up. Support vector machine classification algorithms were used to predict surgical outcomes at 2-years follow-up. Specifically, three feature sets were built for each of the seven clinical outcome measures (eg, mJOA), including clinical only, DBSI only, and combined feature sets.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven mild (mJOA 15-17), 12 moderate (12-14) and 11 severe (0-11) CSM patients were enrolled. Twenty-four (60%) patients underwent anterior decompressive surgery compared with 16 (40%) posterior approaches. The mean (SD) follow-up was 23.2 (5.6, range 6.1-32.8) months. Feature sets built on combined data (ie, clinical+DBSI metrics) performed significantly better for all outcome measures compared with those only including clinical or DBSI data. When predicting improvement in the mJOA, the clinically driven feature set had an accuracy of 61.9 [61.6, 62.5], compared with 78.6 [78.4, 79.2] in the DBSI feature set, and 90.5 [90.2, 90.8] in the combined feature set.

CONCLUSIONS

When combined with key clinical covariates, preoperative DBSI metrics predicted improvement after surgical decompression for CSM with high accuracy for multiple outcome measures. These results suggest that DBSI may serve as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for CSM valuable in guiding patient selection and informing preoperative counseling.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Postoperative opioid prescription and patient-reported outcomes after elective spine surgery: a Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative study

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to assess how postoperative opioid prescription dosage could affect patient-reported outcomes after elective spine surgery.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) from January 2020 to September 2021 were included in this study. Opioid prescriptions at discharge were converted to total morphine milligram equivalents (MME). A reference value of 225 MME per week was used as a cutoff. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on prescribed total MME: ≤ 225 MME and > 225 MME. Primary outcomes included patient satisfaction, return to work status after surgery, and whether improvement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 4-question short form for physical function (PROMIS PF) and EQ-5D was met. Generalized estimated equations were used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Regression analysis revealed that patients who had postoperative opioids prescribed with > 225 MME were less likely to be satisfied with surgery (adjusted OR [aOR] 0.81) and achieve PROMIS PF MCID (aOR 0.88). They were also more likely to be opioid dependent at 90 days after elective spine surgery (aOR 1.56).

CONCLUSIONS

The opioid epidemic is a serious threat to national public health, and spine surgeons must practice conscientious postoperative opioid prescribing to achieve adequate pain control. The authors' analysis illustrates that a postoperative opioid prescription of 225 MME or less is associated with improved patient satisfaction, greater improvement in physical function, and decreased opioid dependence compared with those who had > 225 MME prescribed.

The Influence of Presenting Physical Function on Postoperative Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression

STUDY DESIGN

The study of retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), satisfaction, and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement following minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MIS-LD) in patients stratified by the preoperative patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function (PROMIS-PF) score.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although prior studies have assessed the predictive utility of preoperative PROMIS-PF scores on patient outcomes in spinal fusion, its utility has not been studied for patients undergoing MIS-LD.

METHODS

Primary, single/multilevel MIS-LD procedures were identified. PROMs were administered at preoperative/6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year/2-year time points and included PROMIS-PF/visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg/Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Satisfaction scores were collected postoperatively. The patients were grouped by preoperative PROMIS-PF score (≤35, >35), with higher scores indicating improved physical function. Demographic/perioperative characteristics were compared using χ 2 /Student t test. Mean PROMs/postoperative satisfaction was compared utilizing 2-sample t test. Postoperative PROM improvement from preoperative was calculated with paired t tests. MCID achievement rates were compared using simple logistic regression.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixteen patients were included, 58 PROMIS-PF≤35 and 158 PROMIS-PF>35. Ethnicity/insurance differed ( P ≤0.004, all). Hospital length of stay was greater for PROMIS-PF>35 ( P =0.042). All preoperative mean PROMs significantly differed except for VAS Back. Several postoperative mean PROMs differed: PROMIS-PF at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/1 year, SF-12 PCS at 6 weeks/12 weeks/1 year, VAS Back at 6 weeks/12 weeks, VAS leg at 6 weeks/12 weeks, and ODI at 6 weeks/12 weeks ( P <0.050, all). All PROMs significantly improved from preoperative at all postoperative time points ( P <0.003, all). The MCID achievement rates differed only for VAS back for 6 weeks, favoring PROMIS-PF>35 cohort ( P =0.001). Postoperative satisfaction was greater in PROMIS-PF>35 cohort for VAS leg at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/2 years, VAS back at 6-weeks/12-weeks, and ODI at all time points ( P <0.037, all). Postoperative satisfaction was greater in PROMIS-PF>35 cohort for individual ODI categories: sleep at 6-weeks/12-weeks/1-year/2-years, lifting, walking, standing, and travel at all time points, and sexual at 6-weeks/12-weeks/1-year/2-years ( P <0.030, all).

CONCLUSION

Poorer preoperative PROMIS-PF scores were associated with worse postoperative clinical outcomes and satisfaction. By stratifying patients with preoperative PROMIS-PF scores, surgeons may better predict postoperative clinical improvement and seek to manage patient expectations.

Development and internal validation of predictive models to assess risk of post-acute care facility discharge in adults undergoing multi-level instrumented fusions for lumbar degenerative pathology and spinal deformity

PURPOSE

To develop a model for factors predictive of Post-Acute Care Facility (PACF) discharge in adult patients undergoing elective multi-level (≥ 3 segments) lumbar/thoracolumbar spinal instrumented fusions.

METHODS

The State Inpatient Databases acquired from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project from 2005 to 2013 were queried for adult patients who underwent elective multi-level thoracolumbar fusions for spinal deformity. Outcome variables were classified as discharge to home or PACF. Predictive variables included demographic, pre-operative, and operative factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses informed development of a logistic regression-based predictive model using seven selected variables. Performance metrics included area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

Included for analysis were 8866 patients. The logistic model including significant variables from multivariate analysis yielded an AUC of 0.75. Stepwise logistic regression was used to simplify the model and assess number of variables needed to reach peak AUC, which included seven selected predictors (insurance, interspaces fused, gender, age, surgical region, CCI, and revision surgery) and had an AUC of 0.74. Model cut-off for predictive PACF discharge was 0.41, yielding a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 59%.

CONCLUSIONS

The seven variables associated significantly with PACF discharge (age > 60, female gender, non-private insurance, primary operations, instrumented fusion involving 8+ interspaces, thoracolumbar region, and higher CCI scores) may aid in identification of adults at risk for discharge to a PACF following elective multi-level lumbar/thoracolumbar spinal fusions for spinal deformity. This may in turn inform discharge planning and expectation management.

Predictive Models for Length of Stay and Discharge Disposition in Elective Spine Surgery: Development, Validation, and Comparison to the ACS NSQIP Risk Calculator

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study at a single academic institution.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to utilize machine learning to predict hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition following adult elective spine surgery, and to compare performance metrics of machine learning models to the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's (ACS NSQIP) prediction calculator.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A total of 3678 adult patients undergoing elective spine surgery between 2014 and 2019, acquired from the electronic health record.

METHODS

Patients were divided into three stratified cohorts: cervical degenerative, lumbar degenerative, and adult spinal deformity groups. Predictive variables included demographics, body mass index, surgical region, surgical invasiveness, surgical approach, and comorbidities. Regression, classification trees, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were used to build predictive models. Validation of the models was conducted on 16% of patients (N=587), using area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, and correlation. Patient data were manually entered into the ACS NSQIP online risk calculator to compare performance. Outcome variables were discharge disposition (home vs. rehabilitation) and LOS (days).

RESULTS

Of 3678 patients analyzed, 51.4% were male (n=1890) and 48.6% were female (n=1788). The average LOS was 3.66 days. In all, 78% were discharged home and 22% discharged to rehabilitation. Compared with NSQIP (Pearson R2 =0.16), the predictions of poisson regression ( R2 =0.29) and LASSO ( R2 =0.29) models were significantly more correlated with observed LOS ( P =0.025 and 0.004, respectively). Of the models generated to predict discharge location, logistic regression yielded an AUROC of 0.79, which was statistically equivalent to the AUROC of 0.75 for NSQIP ( P =0.135).

CONCLUSION

The predictive models developed in this study can enable accurate preoperative estimation of LOS and risk of rehabilitation discharge for adult patients undergoing elective spine surgery. The demonstrated models exhibited better performance than NSQIP for prediction of LOS and equivalent performance to NSQIP for prediction of discharge location.

Risk factors for extended length of stay and non-home discharge in adults treated with multi-level fusion for lumbar degenerative pathology and deformity

PURPOSE

To identify independent risk factors, including the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) score, associated with extended length of stay (eLOS) and non-home discharge following elective multi-level instrumented spine fusion operations for diagnosis of adult spinal deformity (ASD) and lumbar degenerative pathology.

METHODS

Adults who underwent multi-level ([Formula: see text] segments) instrumented spine fusions for ASD and lumbar degenerative pathology at a single institution (2016-2021) were reviewed. Presence of a pre-operative RAPT score was used as an inclusion criterion. Excluded were patients who underwent non-elective operations, revisions, operations for trauma, malignancy, and/or infections. Outcomes were eLOS (> 7 days) and discharge location (home vs. non-home). Predictor variables included demographics, comorbidities, operative information, Surgical Invasiveness Index (SII), and RAPT score. Fisher's exact test was used for univariate analysis, and significant variables were implemented in multivariate binary logistic regression, with generation of 95% percent confidence intervals (CI), odds ratios (OR), and p-values.

RESULTS

Included for analysis were 355 patients. Post-operatively, 36.6% (n = 130) had eLOS and 53.2% (n = 189) had a non-home discharge. Risk factors significant for a non-home discharge were older age (> 70 years), SII > 36, pre-op RAPT < 10, DMII, diagnosis of depression or anxiety, and eLOS. Risk factors significant for an eLOS were SII > 20, RAPT < 6, and an ASA score of 3.

CONCLUSION

The RAPT score and SII were most important significant predictors of eLOS and non-home discharges following multi-level instrumented fusions for lumbar spinal pathology and deformity. Preoperative optimization of the RAPT's individual components may provide a useful strategy for decreasing LOS and modifying discharge disposition.

The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Leg Pain on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement, and Patient Satisfaction After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

OBJECTIVE

To compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), satisfaction, and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in patients stratified by preoperative leg pain.

METHODS

Patients undergoing MIS-TLIF were collected through retrospective review of a prospectively maintained single-surgeon database. PROMs administered preoperatively/postoperatively included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), visual analog scale (VAS) back/leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) Physical/Mental Component Score (PCS/MCS). Patients were grouped based on preoperative VAS leg scores: VAS leg ≤7 or VAS leg >7. Inferential statistics were used to compare PROMs, MCID achievement rates, and postoperative satisfaction between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 562 patients were eligible (168 VAS leg score ≤7; 394 VAS leg score >7). Significant differences between cohorts in postoperative mean PROMs were noted for PROMIS-PF at 6 weeks/2 years, SF-12 PCS at 6 weeks/2 years, SF-12 MCS at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/1 year, VAS back score at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months, VAS leg score at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/2 years and ODI at all postoperative time points (P < 0.045, all). In the VAS leg score >7 cohort, a greater proportion achieving MCID for VAS leg score at all postoperative time points and ODI at 12 weeks (P < 0.010, all). Postoperative satisfaction was greater in VAS back score ≤7 cohort for VAS leg score at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/2 years, VAS back score at 12 weeks/2 years, and ODI at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/2 years (P < 0.046, all).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe preoperative leg pain showed worse postoperative PROM scores and patient satisfaction for disability and back/leg pain. MCID achievement rates across cohorts were similar. Patients with severe leg pain may have expectations for surgical benefits incongruent with their postoperative outcomes, and physicians may seek to manage the preoperative expectations of their patients to reflect likely outcomes after MIS-TLIF.

Factors associated with greater patient satisfaction in outpatient neurosurgical clinics: Recommendation for surgery, older age, cranial chief complaint, and public health insurance

OBJECTIVE

Patient satisfaction has increasingly played a role in determining care quality. Surveys are used to gauge patient experience, satisfaction of care, and likelihood to recommend providers and facilities. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether clinical and demographic data predict greater patient satisfaction with providers in the outpatient neurosurgery clinic.

METHODS

Press-Ganey (Press Ganey Associates, South Bend, IL) evaluations of 1521 patients were reviewed in an academic neurosurgical clinic from January 1, 2019 through February 1, 2021. We analyzed associations between Press-Ganey ratings and patient demographics, chief complaint, psychiatric comorbidities, number of orders placed, medication prescriptions, surgical recommendation, payor status, and referral source. We used univariate logistic regression to assess for associations between independent variables and Press-Ganey ratings. Multivariable logistic regression was used for associated factors.

RESULTS

For the Likelihood to Recommend question, older age (p = 0.003), cranial chief complaint (p = 0.046), and recommendations for surgery (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with "good" ratings. For the rating of Care Received, older age (p = 0.002), cranial chief complaint (p = 0.05), and recommendations for surgery (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with "good" ratings. For Confidence in Care Provider question, recommendations for surgery (p = <0.001) and government insurance type (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with "good" ratings.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with older age, cranial pathologies, a recommendation for surgery, and government health insurance were significantly associated with favorable patient satisfaction with providers in the outpatient neurosurgery clinic. Prospective studies should target patient populations who are younger, have spinal complaints, have non-surgical needs, and have commercial insurance to improve satisfaction.

Meeting Patient Expectations and Achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Back Disability, Back Pain, and Leg Pain May Provide Predictive Utility for Achieving Patient Satisfaction Among Lumbar Decompression Patients

OBJECTIVE

Our study evaluates minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement for back pain/leg pain/disability and meeting preoperative expectations as predictors of patient satisfaction after minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MIS-LD) surgery.

METHODS

Single/multilevel MIS-LD procedures were identified. Patient-reported outcome measures (preoperative/postoperative), expectations (preoperative), and satisfaction (postoperative) were collected for visual analog scale (VAS) back/VAS leg/Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Student's t-test assessed patient-reported outcome measure improvement from preoperative baseline. Correlations between outcome and satisfaction scores were evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient and categorized according to strength of relationship. MCID achievement and meeting expectations were evaluated as predictors of postoperative patient satisfaction with simple linear regression. Comparison of meeting expectations or achieving MCID as predictors of satisfaction scores was performed using a post hoc Suest test comparison of standardized β-coefficients.

RESULTS

A total of 329 patients were included. All outcomes improved from baselines (P < 0.001, all) at all postoperative time points and demonstrated strong and negative correlations with satisfaction scores (P < 0.001, all). Majority of patients had their expectations met for ODI/VAS back/VAS leg and achieved MCID for ODI/VAS back/VAS leg at all time points and overall. Both MCID achievement and meeting preoperative expectations demonstrated significant associations with satisfaction scores at all time points for ODI/VAS back/VAS leg. Post hoc analysis of predictors of patient satisfaction in pain and disability demonstrated that MCID achievement was an equivalent predictor to meeting patient preoperative expectations at all postoperative time points.

CONCLUSION

Pain/disability improved after MIS-LD; improvement was strongly correlated with postoperative satisfaction. Meeting expectations/MCID achievement is associated with satisfaction. MCID achievement was equivalent to meeting expectations in predicting satisfaction at all postoperative time points for pain/disability.

Recommendation of Surgery and Other Interventions Is Associated With Increased Patient Satisfaction With Orthopedic Outpatient Visits

The primary goal of our study was to determine whether satisfaction with orthopedic surgery outpatient visits is affected by a recommendation for surgery compared with a recommendation for nonoperative treatment, as measured by the Press Ganey Outpatient Medical Practice Survey (PGOMPS). Secondarily, we evaluated the effect of offering an injection, therapy, or any intervention (surgery, injection, therapy, immobilization, aspiration, or radiation therapy) on PGOMPS scores. To investigate this relationship, we reviewed new orthopedic outpatient visits at a tertiary academic center during a single year (2018). Patient satisfaction was defined as a PGOMPS score greater than the 33rd percentile. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression was conducted to determine the effect of a surgical recommendation and the effect of recommending an injection, therapy, or any intervention on the PGOMPS total score and provider subscore. Of the 1217 included patients, multivariate analysis showed that a surgical recommendation was significantly and independently associated with satisfaction on the PGOMPS total score and provider subscore. Multivariate analysis also showed that being offered an injection, therapy, or any intervention was significantly associated with higher PGOMPS total scores compared with not being offered those interventions. Patients who were offered surgery or other interventions were significantly more likely to be satisfied with their encounter and the surgeon. Patients who were offered surgery were significantly more likely to be satisfied with their encounter and the surgeon than those who were not offered surgery. Additionally, patients who were offered any intervention were significantly more likely to be satisfied with their encounter than those who were not offered an intervention. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(3):187-191.].

Patient Satisfaction Following Lumbar Decompression: What is the Role of Mental Health?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between patient-reported depressive symptoms and patient satisfaction following minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MIS LD) METHODS: Primary, single/multilevel MIS LD were identified. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected pre-/post-operatively included VAS back/leg, ODI, PHQ-9, and SF-12 MCS. Patients rated current satisfaction level (0-10) with back/leg pain and disability. Paired Student's t-test compared each postoperative PROM score to its preoperative baseline. At each timepoint, patients were categorized by PHQ-9 and SF-12 MCS scores. One-way ANOVA compared patient satisfaction with back/leg pain and disability among PHQ-9 subgroups. Student's t-test for independent samples compared patient satisfaction between SF-12 MCS subgroups. ANCOVA assessed differences in satisfaction between depression subgroups while controlling for pre-/post-operative values in corresponding PROMs.

RESULTS

193 patients were included. All PROMs demonstrated significant postoperative improvement from 6-weeks through 2-years(p<0.001,all) except PHQ-9 2-years(p=0.874). Mean satisfaction scores ranged from 6.9-7.9(back pain), 7.3-8.0(leg pain), and 7.6-8.0(disability). Satisfaction with back/leg pain and disability significantly differed among PHQ-9 subgroups at all postoperative timepoints(p<0.001,all). Accounting for baseline and current pain/disability values, ANCOVA revealed differences between PHQ-9 subgroups only in satisfaction with back pain 2-years(p<0.001), leg pain 12-weeks/1-year/2-years(p≤0.047,all), and disability 6-months/2-years(p≤0.049,both). Satisfaction differed between SF-12 MCS subgroups at all timepoints(p≤0.047), except back pain 6-months(p=0.263). Accounting for baseline and postoperative pain/disability, ANCOVA revealed differences in satisfaction between SF-12 MCS groups only for back/leg pain 2-years(p≤0.001,both).

CONCLUSION

Independent effect of depression at long-term follow-up was significant. This highlights the importance of understanding the interaction between physical and mental health outcomes to optimize patients' perceptions of surgical outcome.

Minimal clinically important difference in patients who underwent decompression alone for lumbar degenerative disease

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) represents the smallest change in an outcome measure recognized as clinically meaningful to a patient after receiving a clinical intervention. Most studies that discussed the MCIDs for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) included mixed pathologies or procedures despite that the MCID value should be different depending on the intervention. Moreover, despite the efficacy of adopting percentage-change improvement for the MCID threshold, there are limited reports and discussions in the field of lumbar surgery.

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to elucidate the MCIDs for the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQOL 5-dimension 3-level (EQ-5D-3L), physical component summary (PCS) of the Short Form of the Medical Outcomes Study, and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in patients with degenerative LSS treated with decompression surgery without fusion.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 422 patients who underwent decompression surgery for LSS and answered a complete set of questionnaires were included in the study. Patients who underwent endoscopic or revision surgery were excluded.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Preoperative and 1-year postoperative scores of each health-related quality of life questionnaires (HRQOLs) and patient satisfaction questionnaire response METHODS: The patient satisfaction question was used as an anchor, and the cutoff values were estimated based on absolute point improvement from baseline using a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the "mean change" method for MCIDs. The MCID values for percentage-change in HRQOLs were also calculated using ROC curve analysis. The three cutoff values for each HRQOL were validated using the Youden index for determining the most robust MCIDs.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 356 (84.4%) were at least "somewhat satisfied" with the treatment results. The two cutoff values of absolute point-change in each HRQOL, which were estimated by two different anchor-based methods, were similar. The area under the curve of the ROC curve for percentage-change tended to be higher than that for absolute point-change. Moreover, the Youden index of the percentage-change in each HRQOL was higher than that of the absolute point-change calculated by either the "mean change" method or the ROC curve analysis. Based on these results, it was proposed that MCID was 42.4% for percentage-change in ODI, 22.0% for EQ-5D-3L, 13.7% for PCS, 25.0% for NRS (low back pain), 55.6% for NRS (leg pain), 22.2% for NRS (leg numbness).

CONCLUSIONS

The MCIDs of HRQOLs were calculated in patients with LSS treated with decompression surgery without concomitant fusion procedure. The MCID cutoffs based on percentage-change from baseline were more effective than those of absolute point-change.

Prediction of long-term postoperative results of disc wedge and vertebral tilt with intraoperative prone radiograph in posterior correction of thoracolumbar/lumbar curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Preservation of the more mobile lumbar segments is important during thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis surgery; however, the remaining disc wedge angle (DWA) below lowermost instrumented vertebra (LIV) and vertebral body tilt below LIV (LIV+1 tilt) can cause curve progression.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative radiograph to predict the postoperative DWA below LIV and LIV+1 tilt on standing radiographs in patients with LIV of L3 or L4.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 235 patients with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior correction and fusion for the structural thoracolumbar curve and were followed up for >5 years were reviewed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

DWA below LIV, LIV+1 tilt, Cobb angle, trunk shift, apical vertebra translation, and pelvic parameters were measured.

METHODS

Correlation between intraoperative and postoperative measurements of DWA below LIV and LIV+1 tilt were assessed. Additional analysis was performed to identify risk factors and prognosis of LIV+1 tilt ≥10° and DWA below LIV of ≥4° RESULTS: LIV+1 tilt measured on intraoperative radiograph was significantly correlated with the postoperative 5-day and postoperative 5-year evaluation in both groups. However, the intraoperative DWA below LIV was only correlated with the postoperative 5-year value in the L3 group (p=.018). At the 5-year follow-up, patients with LIV+1 tilt ≥10° on intraoperative radiography showed significantly greater LIV+1 tilt (p<.001), apical vertebral translation (p<.001), thoracic curve (p=.008), and thoracolumbar curve (p<.001) than patients with LIV+1 tilt <10°. Intraoperative DWA below LIV of ≥4° was only associated with higher DWA below LIV at the 5-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative measurement of LIV+1 tilt was correlated with long-term postoperative outcomes, and intraoperative LIV+1 tilt ≥10° was associated with a less favorable radiographic outcome. Intraoperative DWA below LIV demonstrated less correlation with postoperative values and was not a prognostic factor for other radiographic parameters.

Patient Satisfaction With Care Is Associated With Better Outcomes in Function and Pain 1 Year After Lumbar Spine Surgery

PURPOSE

There has been increasing interest in patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) to evaluate the patient experience and satisfaction with care. We conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study to determine any association between patients' satisfaction of care and their outcomes 1 year after lumbar spine surgery.

METHODS

Satisfaction with care was recorded through telephone interviews and a standardized questionnaire. Baseline data collection (300 patients) and 1-year follow-up (209 patients) were conducted through The Swedish National Register for Spine Surgery (Swespine). Exposures were patient experiences, health care professional (HCP) attitudes, shared decision-making, and overall satisfaction with care. Associations were evaluated using adjusted analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models.

RESULTS

Satisfaction with HCP attitudes was not associated with improvements at 1 year in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) or back pain; however a significantly greater improvement in leg pain score was reported by patients who were highly satisfied (3.0 points) versus the moderate/low satisfaction group (1.3 points; P=0.008). For shared decision-making, high satisfaction was associated with significantly greater improvements, as compared to moderate/low satisfaction, in ODI (20 vs 11 points; P=0.001), back pain (2.6 vs 1.7 points; P=0.05), and leg pain (3.2 vs 1.9 points, P=0.007). Similarly, high overall satisfaction with care was associated with significantly greater improvements in ODI (18 vs 10 points; P=0.02), back pain (3.2 vs 0.6 points; P<0.001), and leg pain (2.6 vs 1.1 points; P=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate that shared decision-making on perioperative care and patients' overall satisfaction with care were associated with better health outcomes 1 year after lumbar spine surgery.

Guidelines for the conservative treatment of spinal deformities - Questionnaire for a Delphi consensus

Background

Spinal deformity is the oldest disease known to humankind. Many types of treatment methods, including both conservative and surgical, are in use.

Objective

We aimed to validate a published guideline protocol based on the conservative treatment of spinal deformities.

Method

A modified Delphi technique was used with a questionnaire sent out to professionals worldwide regarding the conservative treatment of spinal deformities.

Results

Our study was completed after two rounds. A strong level of agreement of 80% and more (consensus cut-off point) was achieved in most questions in the first round. Some statements were below this margin, and they were sent to the participants via email in the second round for re-evaluation. Consensus was achieved in almost all of the statements in the second round. Only two items did not reach the cut-off point but were close to this value.

Conclusion

This proposed Guideline Protocol was approved by the participants using the Delphi method and can be used as a valid tool for the conservative treatment of spinal deformities.

Clinical implications

A conservative treatment guideline in spinal deformity management, will provide consistency in treatment and will facilitate comparability with surgery. It will be useful in determining the cost-effectiveness of treatment and in choosing the right patient for the right method of treatment. This guideline might help in this context, and may also create a systematic method for clinicians to use as a reference in both research and clinical practice.

The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

OBJECTIVE

To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), satisfaction, and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion stratified by preoperative disability.

METHODS

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions were grouped by preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score: ODI <41 or ODI ≥41. PROMs administered pre/postoperatively included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF), visual analog scale (VAS) back/leg, ODI, and 12-Item Short-Form Physical Composite Score (SF-12 PCS)/12-Item Short-Form Mental Composite Score (SF-12 MCS). Satisfaction scores were collected for VAS back/leg and ODI. Coarsened exact match controlled for differences between cohorts. T tests compared mean PROMs and postoperative improvement/satisfaction between cohorts. Simple logistic regression compared MCID achievement.

RESULTS

After coarsened exact matching, there were 118 patients in the ODI ≤41 and 377 patients in the ODI >41 cohort. The ODI >41 cohort saw greater postoperative inpatient VAS pain score and narcotic consumption on days 0/1 (P < 0.018, all). PROMs differed between cohorts: PROMIS-PF, SF-12 PCS, ODI, VAS back/leg at all postoperative time points and SF-12 MCS at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/1 year (P < 0.045, all). Patients in the ODI >41 cohort demonstrated greater proportion achieving MCID for ODI at all postoperative time points and for SF-12 MCS 6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year (P < 0.040, all). The ODI ≤41 cohort demonstrated greater MCID achievement for overall PROMIS-PF and SF-12 PCS 6 months (P < 0.047, all). Postoperative satisfaction was greater in the ODI ≤41 cohort for VAS leg 6 weeks/12 weeks, VAS back 6 weeks/12 weeks, and ODI all postoperative time points (P < 0.048, all).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative disability associated with worse postoperative PROMs and patient satisfaction for disability, back/leg pain at multiple time points. MCID achievement rates across cohorts were similar for most PROMs at most postoperative time points. Patients with severe disability may have unrealistic expectations for surgical benefits, influencing corresponding postoperative satisfaction.

The Impact of Surgical Site Infection on Patient Outcomes After Open Posterior Instrumented Thoracolumbar Surgery for Degenerative Disorders

BACKGROUND

Few reports in the literature have described the long-term outcome of postoperative infection from the patient perspective. The aim of the present study was to determine if complicated surgical site infection (SSI) affects functional recovery and surgical outcomes up to 2 years after posterior instrumented thoracolumbar surgery for the treatment of degenerative disorders.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study involved patients who had been enrolled in a previous randomized controlled trial that examined antibiotic use for open posterior multilevel thoracolumbar or lumbar instrumented fusion procedures. In the present study, patients who had SSI (n = 79) were compared with those who did not (n = 456). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), leg and back pain scores on a numeric rating scale, Short Form-12 (SF-12) summary scores, and satisfaction with treatment at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Surgical outcomes included adverse events, readmissions, and additional surgery.

RESULTS

The median time to infection was 15 days. Of the 535 patients, 31 (5.8%) had complicated infections and 48 (9.0%) had superficial infections. Patients with an infection had a higher body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.001), had more commonly received preoperative vancomycin (p = 0.050), were more likely to have had a revision as the index procedure (p = 0.004), had worse preoperative mental functioning (mental component summary score, 40.7 ± 1.6 versus 44.1 ± 0.6), had more operatively treated levels (p = 0.024), and had a higher rate of additional surgery (p = 0.001). At 6 months after surgery, patients who developed an infection scored worse on the ODI by 5.3 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4 to 10.1 points) and had worse physical functioning by -4.0 points (95% CI, -6.8 to -1.2 points). Comparison between the groups at 1 and 2 years showed no difference in functional outcomes, satisfaction with treatment, or the likelihood of achieving the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the ODI.

CONCLUSIONS

SSI more than doubled the post-discharge emergency room visit and additional surgery rates. Patients with SSI initially (6 months) had poorer overall physical function representing the delay to recovery; however, the negative impact resolved by the first postoperative year.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Diagnosis and treatment of congenital scoliosis

Background: Congenital scoliosis is caused by anomalies of the vertebra, such as hemivertebra or unsegmented bar, which result in asymmetric growth of the spine. The disruption of vertebra development during embryogenesis may be accompanied by other congenital multi-organ anomalies. The progression of the scoliotic curve may also hinder the development of other organs.Current Concepts: Hemivertebra excision and short spinal fusion have demonstrated favorable outcomes. However, the need for spinal growth and lung development has led to new treatment modalities. Growth-friendly surgeries, such as with a growing rod or vertical expandable rib-based distraction device, have demonstrated good results with curve correction while maintaining spinal growth. Although the outcome of conservative treatment for congenital scoliosis is questionable, casting may be effective as a “time-buying strategy” to delay the need for surgery.Discussion and Conclusion: It is essential to decide on a treatment plan considering the progression of the curve and growth of the spine and lungs through an individualized approach.

The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Back Pain on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Recovery Ratios, and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF)

BACKGROUND

Limited literature has addressed impact of preoperative back pain severity on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), recovery ratios (RRs), and patient satisfaction following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).

METHODS

MIS TLIFs were retrospectively identified and grouped: preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) back ≤7 or VAS back >7. PROMs, including PROMIS-PF, VAS back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and SF-12 Physical Composite Score and Mental Composite Score (MCS), were collected pre- and postoperatively. A PROM's RR was calculated as proportion of postoperative improvement to overall potential improvement.

RESULTS

In total, 740 patients were included: 359 patients with VAS back ≤7 and 381 patients with VAS back >7. The VAS back >7 cohort reported significantly greater postoperative inpatient pain (P ≤ .003, both). All preoperative and the following postoperative PROMs favored the VAS back ≤7 cohort: PROMIS-PF 2-years, VAS back overall, SF-12 Physical Composite Score 12 weeks and 1 year, SF-12 MCS 6 weeks/12 weeks, VAS leg 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years, and ODI overall (P ≤ 0.048, all). The VAS back >7 cohort demonstrated greater delta PROMs for all VAS back and ODI except 2 years (P ≤ 0.021, all). A greater proportion of patients in the VAS back >7 group achieved minimal clinically important difference for VAS back overall, ODI 6 weeks/12 weeks, PROMIS-PF 6 weeks, and SF-12 MCS 6 weeks/6 months (P ≤ 0.044, all). The VAS back>7 cohort RR was significantly greater for VAS back 6 months and VAS leg 6 months/2 years (P ≤ 0.034, all). The VAS back ≤7 cohort's postoperative satisfaction was significantly greater for VAS back 12 weeks, VAS leg 12 weeks, and ODI 6 weeks/12 weeks (P ≤ 0.046, all).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with greater preoperative back pain demonstrated significantly worse postoperative scores for most PROMs at most time points and significantly worse patient satisfaction for disability, back and leg pain at multiple time points.

Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive and Open Surgeries for Adult Spinal Deformity

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction has become an important variable in assessing outcomes after spine surgery. Although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques have become popular owing to reduced perioperative complications compared with open deformity surgery, whether patient-reported postoperative satisfaction differ between the 2 surgical approaches is unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in patients who underwent open surgery or MIS for adult spinal deformity (ASD).

METHODS

PRO scores were prospectively collected for patients undergoing deformity correction surgery between 2016 and 2018. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years, ASD, and completed PRO surveys. Patient demographic, clinical, and radiographic data and PRO survey responses were analyzed. A post hoc analysis comparing patients who were satisfied with their outcome and those who were unsatisfied was performed.

RESULTS

Forty patients who underwent operative management of ASD (19 in the open surgery group and 21 in the MIS group) met the criteria for inclusion in this study. Patients in the MIS group reported higher mental health and self-image scores at 6 months; however, at the 12-month follow-up, both the open surgery and MIS groups reported minimal clinically important differences in back pain, leg pain, and functional status. Patient satisfaction scores did not differ based on surgical approach or intraoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

PRO after open surgery and after MIS for ASD reflected successful outcomes with significant improvements in PRO survey scores but with subtle differences in the postoperative recovery process. The MIS group reported faster recovery with earlier improvement in self-image and mental health scores, which may stem from correction of smaller deformities. At the 12-month follow-up, postoperative satisfaction was high for the majority of patients in both groups.

Preoperative HbA1c > 8% Is Associated With Poor Outcomes in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative Study

BACKGROUND

Preoperative hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is a useful screening tool since a significant portion of diabetic patients in the United States are undiagnosed and the prevalence of diabetes continues to increase. However, there is a paucity of literature analyzing comprehensive association between HbA1c and postoperative outcome in lumbar spine surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic value of preoperative HbA1c > 8% in patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery.

METHODS

The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) database was queried to track all elective lumbar spine surgeries between January 2018 and December 2019. Cases were divided into 2 cohorts based on preoperative HbA1c level (≤8% and >8%). Measured outcomes include any complication, surgical site infection (SSI), readmission (RA) within 30 d (30RA) and 90 d (90RA) of index operation, patient satisfaction, and the percentage of patients who achieved minimum clinically important difference (MCID) using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.

RESULTS

We captured 4778 patients in this study. Our multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients with HbA1c > 8% were more likely to experience postoperative complication (odds ratio [OR] 1.81, 95% CI 1.20-2.73; P = .005) and be readmitted within 90 d of index surgery (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.08-2.54; P = .021). They also had longer hospital stay (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.23; P = .009) and were less likely to achieve functional improvement after surgery (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.92; P = .016).

CONCLUSION

HbA1c > 8% is a reliable predictor of poor outcome in elective lumbar spine surgery. Clinicians should consider specialty consultation to optimize patients' glycemic control prior to surgery.

Comparative Analysis of Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes Between Conventional Open and Minimally Invasive Scoliosis Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare radiologic and clinical outcomes between conventional open scoliosis surgery (COSS) and minimally invasive scoliosis surgery (MISS) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

Forty-nine AIS patients who underwent scoliosis surgery were retrospectively analyzed in 2 groups: the COSS (n = 25) and MISS (n = 24) groups. COSS procedures used monoaxial screws with a rod derotation (RD) maneuver through a long linear incision. In the MISS group, the technique was applied via 2 or 3 incisions of about 3 cm in length, and a muscle-splitting approach and correction were performed using polyaxial screws with an RD maneuver.

RESULTS

In the analysis of the coronal (Cobb angle of the main curve) and sagittal planes (thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis), correction was significantly superior in the COSS group (all P values >0.05). However, in the coronal balance and spinal vertical axis, which are global balance factors, there were no significant differences between the groups (P = 0.331 and P = 0.750). There were significant differences between the COSS and MISS groups in terms of mean hospital stay duration (P < 0.001), operative time (P < 0.001), estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), and scar length (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the various Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire scores between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although COSS for AIS was superior for correcting the main curve, MISS was associated with shorter hospitalization, less blood loss, and superior cosmesis as well as providing adequate correction in both the coronal and sagittal planes.

The dynamics of satisfaction in surgical and non-surgical adult spinal deformity patients

PURPOSE

For adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients receiving operative (op) and non-operative (non-op) treatment, the relationship between HRQoL measures, complications and self-reported satisfaction remains unclear. The objective of this analysis is to study nonlinear association dynamics between ASD patient satisfaction, HRQoL, and complications over a two-year follow-up period.

METHODS

From a prospective multicenter international adult spinal deformity database, all patients with 2-year follow-up data on satisfaction (21st question of SRS-22r) were identified and included. A total of 12 LOESS (local polynomial fit) regressions were performed between patient satisfaction (SRS22 item 21) and HRQoL measures (ODI, SF36PCS and SRS22 subtotal) interacting with surgery at baseline, 6 months and 1 and 2 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 856 patients (527 op and 329 non-op) were included. At baseline, satisfaction was lower for patients scheduled for surgery even when HRQL was similar to those elected for conservative treatment. The nonlinear correlations showed that for similar PROMs, op patients reached higher satisfaction levels during follow-up, especially at six months. In fact, at six months operated patients with a deterioration of their initial PROMs had some improvement in their satisfaction, which could not be further observed at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfaction does not correlate well with other PROMs, and it might be subject to other external factors not directly related to treatment. Even if patient satisfaction is important in evaluating well-being and patient's experience with medical care, it should not be considered as an isolated proxy to measure quality of treatment.

Pre-treatment expectations of patients with spinal metastases: what do we know and what can we learn from other disciplines? A systematic review of qualitative studies

Background

Little is known about treatment expectations of patients with spinal metastases undergoing radiotherapy and/or surgery. Assuming that patients with spinal metastases share characteristics with patients who had spinal surgery for non-cancer related conditions and with advanced cancer patients, we performed a systematic review to summarize the literature on patient expectations regarding treatment outcomes of spinal surgery and advanced cancer care.

Methods

A comprehensive search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO for studies between 2000 and sep-2019. Studies including adult patients (> 18 years), undergoing spinal surgery or receiving advanced cancer care, investigating patients’ pre-treatment expectations regarding treatment outcomes were included. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full-texts, extracted data and assessed methodological quality.

Results

The search identified 7343 articles, of which 92 were selected for full-text review. For this review, 31 articles were included. Patients undergoing spinal surgery had overly optimistic expectations regarding pain and symptom relief, they underestimated the probability of functional disability, and overestimated the probability of (complete) recovery and return to work. Studies highlighted that patients feel not adequately prepared for surgery in terms of post-treatment expectations. Similarly, advanced cancer patients receiving palliative treatment often had overly optimistic expectations regarding their survival probability and cure rates.

Conclusions

Patients tend to have overly optimistic expectations regarding pain and symptom relief, recovery and prognosis following spinal surgery or advanced cancer care. Pretreatment consultation about the expected pain and symptom relief, recovery and prognosis may improve understanding of prognosis, and promote and manage expectations, which, in turn, may lead to better perceived outcomes.

Trial registration

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020145151.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-020-07683-7.

Predictors of Patient Satisfaction in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Recently, there has been increased interest in patient satisfaction measures such as Press Ganey and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys. In this systematic review, the spine surgery literature is analyzed to evaluate factors predictive of patient satisfaction as measured by these surveys.

METHODS

A thorough literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. All English-language articles from database inception to July 2020 were screened for study inclusion according to PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of the 1899 published studies were included for qualitative analysis. There has been a statistically significant increase in the number of publications across years (P = 0.04). Overall, the studies evaluated the relationship between patient satisfaction and patient demographics (71%), preoperative and intraoperative clinical factors (21%), and postoperative factors (33%). Top positive predictors of patient satisfaction were patient and nursing/medical staff relationship (n = 4; 17%), physician-patient relationship (n = 4; 17%), managerial oversight of received care (n = 3; 13%), same sex/ethnicity between patient and physician (n = 2; 8%), and older age (n = 2; 8%). Top negative predictors of patient satisfaction were high Charlson Comorbidity Index/high disability/worse overall health functioning (n = 7; 29%), increased length of hospital stay (n = 4; 17%), high rating for pain/complications/readmissions (n = 4; 17%), and psychosocial factors (n = 3; 13%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is heterogeneity in terms of different factors, both clinical and nonclinically related, that affect patient satisfaction ratings. More research is warranted to investigate the role of hospital consumer surveys in the spine surgical patient population.

Clinical utility of enhanced recovery after surgery pathways in pediatric spinal deformity surgery: systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

More than 7500 children undergo surgery for scoliosis each year, at an estimated annual cost to the health system of $1.1 billion. There is significant interest among patients, parents, providers, and payors in identifying methods for delivering quality outcomes at lower costs. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been suggested as one possible solution. Here the authors conducted a systematic review of the literature describing the clinical and economic benefits of ERAS protocols in pediatric spinal deformity surgery.

METHODS

The authors identified all English-language articles on ERAS protocol use in pediatric spinal deformity surgery by using the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews, EMBASE, CINAHL, and OVID MEDLINE. Quantitative analyses of comparative articles using random effects were performed for the following clinical outcomes: 1) length of stay (LOS); 2) complication rate; 3) wound infection rate; 4) 30-day readmission rate; 5) reoperation rate; and 6) postoperative pain scores.

RESULTS

Of 950 articles reviewed, 7 were included in the qualitative analysis and 6 were included in the quantitative analysis. The most frequently cited benefits of ERAS protocols were shorter LOS, earlier urinary catheter removal, and earlier discontinuation of patient-controlled analgesia pumps. Quantitative analyses showed ERAS protocols to be associated with shorter LOS (mean difference -1.12 days; 95% CI -1.51, -0.74; p < 0.001), fewer postoperative complications (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.20, 0.68; p = 0.001), and lower pain scores on postoperative day (POD) 0 (mean -0.92; 95% CI -1.29, -0.56; p < 0.001) and POD 2 (-0.61; 95% CI -0.75, -0.47; p < 0.001). There were no differences in reoperation rate or POD 1 pain scores. ERAS-treated patients had a trend toward higher 30-day readmission rates and earlier discontinuation of patient-controlled analgesia (both p = 0.06). Insufficient data existed to reach a conclusion about cost differences.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this systematic review suggest that ERAS protocols may shorten hospitalizations, reduce postoperative complication rates, and reduce postoperative pain scores in children undergoing scoliosis surgery. Publication biases exist, and therefore larger, prospective, multicenter data are needed to validate these results.

Patient-Reported Expectations, Outcome and Satisfaction in Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Stabilization Surgery: A Prospective Study

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become an important aspect of quality control in modern healthcare. In this prospective observational study on 199 patients undergoing thoracolumbar stabilization surgery, we quantified preoperative expectations and PROMs at six and twelve months after surgery, and we investigated what constitutes patient satisfaction with the outcome. We used the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Preoperative expectations were high (expected ODI: 9 ± 13%; leg pain: 1.0 ± 1.4; back pain: 1.3 ± 1.5). Pain and disability improved substantially, but expectations were mostly unrealistic (ODI expectation fulfilled after six months: 28% of patients; back pain: 48%). However, satisfaction was high (70% at six months after surgery). Satisfied patients had significantly better pain and disability outcomes and higher rates of expectation fulfillment than non-satisfied patients. Patients undergoing revision stabilization had worse outcomes than all other diagnosis groups. Prior stabilization surgery was identified as an independent risk factor for dissatisfaction. There were no preoperative pain or disability levels that predicted dissatisfaction. The data presented in this study can provide benchmarks for diagnosis-specific PROM targets in thoracolumbar stabilization surgery. Future studies should investigate whether satisfaction can be influenced, e.g., by discussing realistic outcome targets with patients ahead of surgery.

Clinical Implications of the Epidural Fat Thickness in the Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

OBJECTIVE

Lumbar epidural lipomatosis is a rare condition defined as the excessive accumulation of epidural fat (EF). We herein investigated the indicators of the posterior compression factors, EF and yellow ligament, to identify the clinical features of lumbar epidural lipomatosis.

METHODS

Five hundred consecutive patients who underwent posterior lumbar decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) were retrospectively reviewed. The EF/SC-L index (the ratio of the anteroposterior length of the EF to that of the spinal canal [SC]) was evaluated at the spinal level that exhibited maximum dural tube compression. The participants were divided into 3 groups: grade I, EF/SC-L index ≤50%; grade II, EF/SC-L index 51%-74%; grade III, EF/SC-L index ≥75%. EF/SC-A (the ratio of the cross-sectional area of EF to that of SC) and YL/SC-A (the ratio of the cross-sectional area of yellow ligament [YL] to that of SC) were calculated. The clinical outcomes were assessed according to the Japan Orthopaedic Association scale for lumbar disease.

RESULTS

EF/SC-L exhibited a significantly positive correlation with EF/SC-A (r = 0.82, P < 0.001), and a negative correlation with YL/SC-A (r = -0.71, P < 0.001). The Japan Orthopaedic Association score recovery rate was 56.7 ± 22.6 in the case-matched control group, 34.5 ± 31.2 in the grade II group (P < 0.001), and 39.6 ± 24.9 in the grade III group (P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

The EF/SC-L index is a simple and reliable indicator to quantitatively evaluate posterior compression in patients with LSS. As the accumulation of EF is associated with worse operative outcomes, the EF/SC-L index should be considered when planning lumbar decompression surgery for patients with LSS.