1
|
Obšteter J, Jenko J, Pocrnic I, Gorjanc G. Investigating the benefits and perils of importing genetic material in small cattle breeding programs via simulation. J Dairy Sci 2023; 106:S0022-0302(23)00385-5. [PMID: 37474361 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2022-23132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
Small breeding programs are limited in achieving competitive genetic gain and prone to high rates of inbreeding. Thus, they often import genetic material to increase genetic gain and to limit the loss of genetic variability. However, the benefit of import depends on the strength of genotype-by-environment interaction. Import also diminishes the relevance of domestic selection and the use of domestic breeding animals. Introduction of genomic selection has potentially exacerbated this issue, but is also opening the potential for smaller breeding programs. The aim of this paper was to determine when and to what extent small breeding programs benefit from importing genetic material by quantifying the genetic gain as well as the sources of genetic gain. We simulated 2 cattle breeding programs of the same breed that represented a large foreign and a small domestic breeding program. The programs differed in selection parameters of sire selection, and in the initial genetic mean and annual genetic gain. We evaluated a control scenario without the use of foreign sires in the domestic breeding program and 24 scenarios that varied the percentage of domestic dams mated with foreign sires, the genetic correlation between the breeding programs (0.8 or 0.9), and the time of implementing genomic selection in the domestic compared with the foreign breeding program (concurrently or with a 10-yr delay). We compared the scenarios based on the genetic gain and genic standard deviation. Finally, we partitioned breeding values and genetic trends of the scenarios to quantify the contribution of domestic selection and import to the domestic genetic gain. The simulation revealed that when both breeding programs implemented genomic selection simultaneously, the use of foreign sires increased domestic genetic gain only when genetic correlation was 0.9 (10%-18% increase). In contrast, when the domestic breeding program implemented genomic selection with a 10-yr delay, import increased genetic gain at both tested correlations, 0.8 (5%-23% increase) and 0.9 (15%-53% increase). The increase was significant when we mated at least 10% or 25% domestic females with foreign sires and increased with the increasing use of foreign sires, but with a diminishing return. The partitioning analysis revealed that the contribution of import expectedly increased with the increased use of foreign sires. However, the increase did not depend on the genetic correlation and was not proportional to the increase in domestic genetic gain. This represents a peril for small breeding programs because they could be overly relying on import with diminishing returns for the genetic gain, marginal benefit for the genetic variability, and large loss of the domestic germplasm. The benefit and peril of import depends on an interplay of genetic correlation, extent of using foreign sires, and a breeding scheme. It is therefore crucial that small breeding programs assess the possible benefits of import beyond domestic selection. The benefit of import should be weighed against the perils of decreased use of domestic sires and decreased contribution and value of domestic selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Obšteter
- Department of Animal Science, Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| | - J Jenko
- Geno Breeding and A.I. Association, N-2317, Hamar, Norway
| | - I Pocrnic
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - G Gorjanc
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zoda A, Ogawa S, Kagawa R, Tsukahara H, Obinata R, Urakawa M, Oono Y. Single-Step Genomic Prediction of Superovulatory Response Traits in Japanese Black Donor Cows. BIOLOGY 2023; 12:biology12050718. [PMID: 37237533 DOI: 10.3390/biology12050718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
We assessed the performance of single-step genomic prediction of breeding values for superovulatory response traits in Japanese Black donor cows. A total of 25,332 records of the total number of embryos and oocytes (TNE) and the number of good embryos (NGE) per flush for 1874 Japanese Black donor cows were collected during 2008 and 2022. Genotype information on 36,426 autosomal single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for 575 out of the 1,874 cows was used. Breeding values were predicted exploiting a two-trait repeatability animal model. Two genetic relationship matrices were used, one based on pedigree information (A matrix) and the other considering both pedigree and SNP marker genotype information (H matrix). Estimated heritabilities of TNE and NGE were 0.18 and 0.11, respectively, when using the H matrix, which were both slightly lower than when using the A matrix (0.26 for TNE and 0.16 for NGE). Estimated genetic correlations between the traits were 0.61 and 0.66 when using H and A matrices, respectively. When the variance components were the same in breeding value prediction, the mean reliability was greater when using the H matrix than when using the A matrix. This advantage seems more prominent for cows with low reliability when using the A matrix. The results imply that introducing single-step genomic prediction could boost the rate of genetic improvement of superovulatory response traits, but efforts should be made to maintain genetic diversity when performing selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Zoda
- Research and Development Group, Zen-noh Embryo Transfer Center, Kamishihoro 080-1407, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Ogawa
- Division of Meat Animal and Poultry Research, Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba 305-0901, Japan
| | - Rino Kagawa
- Research and Development Group, Zen-noh Embryo Transfer Center, Kamishihoro 080-1407, Japan
| | - Hayato Tsukahara
- Research and Development Group, Zen-noh Embryo Transfer Center, Kamishihoro 080-1407, Japan
| | - Rui Obinata
- Research and Development Group, Zen-noh Embryo Transfer Center, Kamishihoro 080-1407, Japan
| | - Manami Urakawa
- Research and Development Group, Zen-noh Embryo Transfer Center, Kamishihoro 080-1407, Japan
| | - Yoshio Oono
- Research and Development Group, Zen-noh Embryo Transfer Center, Kamishihoro 080-1407, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pocrnic I, Obšteter J, Gaynor RC, Wolc A, Gorjanc G. Assessment of long-term trends in genetic mean and variance after the introduction of genomic selection in layers: a simulation study. Front Genet 2023; 14:1168212. [PMID: 37234871 PMCID: PMC10206274 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1168212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Nucleus-based breeding programs are characterized by intense selection that results in high genetic gain, which inevitably means reduction of genetic variation in the breeding population. Therefore, genetic variation in such breeding systems is typically managed systematically, for example, by avoiding mating the closest relatives to limit progeny inbreeding. However, intense selection requires maximum effort to make such breeding programs sustainable in the long-term. The objective of this study was to use simulation to evaluate the long-term impact of genomic selection on genetic mean and variance in an intense layer chicken breeding program. We developed a large-scale stochastic simulation of an intense layer chicken breeding program to compare conventional truncation selection to genomic truncation selection optimized with either minimization of progeny inbreeding or full-scale optimal contribution selection. We compared the programs in terms of genetic mean, genic variance, conversion efficiency, rate of inbreeding, effective population size, and accuracy of selection. Our results confirmed that genomic truncation selection has immediate benefits compared to conventional truncation selection in all specified metrics. A simple minimization of progeny inbreeding after genomic truncation selection did not provide any significant improvements. Optimal contribution selection was successful in having better conversion efficiency and effective population size compared to genomic truncation selection, but it must be fine-tuned for balance between loss of genetic variance and genetic gain. In our simulation, we measured this balance using trigonometric penalty degrees between truncation selection and a balanced solution and concluded that the best results were between 45° and 65°. This balance is specific to the breeding program and depends on how much immediate genetic gain a breeding program may risk vs. save for the future. Furthermore, our results show that the persistence of accuracy is better with optimal contribution selection compared to truncation selection. In general, our results show that optimal contribution selection can ensure long-term success in intensive breeding programs using genomic selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Pocrnic
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Jana Obšteter
- Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - R. Chris Gaynor
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Wolc
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States
- Hy-Line International, Dallas Center, IA, United States
| | - Gregor Gorjanc
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Omer EA, Hinrichs D, Addo S, Roessler R. Development of a breeding program for improving the milk yield performance of Butana cattle under smallholder production conditions using a stochastic simulation approach. J Dairy Sci 2022; 105:5261-5270. [DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-21307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
5
|
Schmidtmann C, Slagboom M, Sørensen AC, Hinrichs D, Thaller G, Kargo M. Short‐ and long‐term consequences of collaboration between Northern European Red dairy and dual‐purpose cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 2022; 139:447-461. [DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christin Schmidtmann
- Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel Kiel Germany
| | - Margot Slagboom
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics Aarhus University Tjele Denmark
| | | | - Dirk Hinrichs
- Department of Animal Breeding University of Kassel Witzenhausen Germany
| | - Georg Thaller
- Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel Kiel Germany
| | - Morten Kargo
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics Aarhus University Tjele Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gutierrez-Reinoso MA, Aponte PM, Garcia-Herreros M. Genomic Analysis, Progress and Future Perspectives in Dairy Cattle Selection: A Review. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11:599. [PMID: 33668747 PMCID: PMC7996307 DOI: 10.3390/ani11030599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomics comprises a set of current and valuable technologies implemented as selection tools in dairy cattle commercial breeding programs. The intensive progeny testing for production and reproductive traits based on genomic breeding values (GEBVs) has been crucial to increasing dairy cattle productivity. The knowledge of key genes and haplotypes, including their regulation mechanisms, as markers for productivity traits, may improve the strategies on the present and future for dairy cattle selection. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) such as quantitative trait loci (QTL), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), or single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) methods have already been included in global dairy programs for the estimation of marker-assisted selection-derived effects. The increase in genetic progress based on genomic predicting accuracy has also contributed to the understanding of genetic effects in dairy cattle offspring. However, the crossing within inbred-lines critically increased homozygosis with accumulated negative effects of inbreeding like a decline in reproductive performance. Thus, inaccurate-biased estimations based on empirical-conventional models of dairy production systems face an increased risk of providing suboptimal results derived from errors in the selection of candidates of high genetic merit-based just on low-heritability phenotypic traits. This extends the generation intervals and increases costs due to the significant reduction of genetic gains. The remarkable progress of genomic prediction increases the accurate selection of superior candidates. The scope of the present review is to summarize and discuss the advances and challenges of genomic tools for dairy cattle selection for optimizing breeding programs and controlling negative inbreeding depression effects on productivity and consequently, achieving economic-effective advances in food production efficiency. Particular attention is given to the potential genomic selection-derived results to facilitate precision management on modern dairy farms, including an overview of novel genome editing methodologies as perspectives toward the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel A. Gutierrez-Reinoso
- Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Recursos Naturales, Carrera de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi (UTC), Latacunga 05-0150, Ecuador
- Laboratorio de Biotecnología Animal, Departamento de Ciencia Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Concepción (UdeC), Chillán 3780000, Chile
| | - Pedro M. Aponte
- Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales (COCIBA), Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Quito 170157, Ecuador
- Campus Cumbayá, Instituto de Investigaciones en Biomedicina “One-health”, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Quito 170157, Ecuador
| | - Manuel Garcia-Herreros
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária (INIAV), 2005-048 Santarém, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Obšteter J, Jenko J, Gorjanc G. Genomic Selection for Any Dairy Breeding Program via Optimized Investment in Phenotyping and Genotyping. Front Genet 2021; 12:637017. [PMID: 33679899 PMCID: PMC7928407 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.637017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper evaluates the potential of maximizing genetic gain in dairy cattle breeding by optimizing investment into phenotyping and genotyping. Conventional breeding focuses on phenotyping selection candidates or their close relatives to maximize selection accuracy for breeders and quality assurance for producers. Genomic selection decoupled phenotyping and selection and through this increased genetic gain per year compared to the conventional selection. Although genomic selection is established in well-resourced breeding programs, small populations and developing countries still struggle with the implementation. The main issues include the lack of training animals and lack of financial resources. To address this, we simulated a case-study of a small dairy population with a number of scenarios with equal available resources yet varied use of resources for phenotyping and genotyping. The conventional progeny testing scenario collected 11 phenotypic records per lactation. In genomic selection scenarios, we reduced phenotyping to between 10 and 1 phenotypic records per lactation and invested the saved resources into genotyping. We tested these scenarios at different relative prices of phenotyping to genotyping and with or without an initial training population for genomic selection. Reallocating a part of phenotyping resources for repeated milk records to genotyping increased genetic gain compared to the conventional selection scenario regardless of the amount and relative cost of phenotyping, and the availability of an initial training population. Genetic gain increased by increasing genotyping, despite reduced phenotyping. High-genotyping scenarios even saved resources. Genomic selection scenarios expectedly increased accuracy for young non-phenotyped candidate males and females, but also proven females. This study shows that breeding programs should optimize investment into phenotyping and genotyping to maximize return on investment. Our results suggest that any dairy breeding program using conventional progeny testing with repeated milk records can implement genomic selection without increasing the level of investment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Obšteter
- Department of Animal Science, Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Janez Jenko
- Geno Breeding and A. I. Association, Hamar, Norway
| | - Gregor Gorjanc
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|