Symposium review: Use of multiple biological, management, and performance data for the design of targeted reproductive management strategies for dairy cows

Ovarian function and endocrine phenotypes of lactating dairy cows during the estrous cycle are associated with genomic-enhanced predictions of fertility potential

The objectives of this prospective cohort study were to characterize associations among genomic merit for fertility with ovarian and endocrine function and the estrous behavior of dairy cows during an entire nonhormonally manipulated estrous cycle. Lactating Holstein cows entering their first (n = 82) or second (n = 37) lactation had ear-notch tissue samples collected for genotyping using a commercial genomic test. Based on genomic predicted transmitting ability values for daughter pregnancy rate (gDPR), cows were classified into high (Hi-Fert; gDPR > 0.6, n = 36), medium (Med-Fert; gDPR -1.3 to 0.6, n = 45), and low fertility (Lo-Fert; gDPR < -1.3, n = 38) groups. At 33 to 39 DIM, cohorts of cows were enrolled in the Presynch-Ovsynch protocol for synchronization of ovulation and initiation of a new estrous cycle. Thereafter, the ovarian function and endocrine dynamics were monitored daily until the next ovulation by transrectal ultrasonography and concentrations of progesterone (P4), estradiol, and FSH. Estrous behavior was monitored with an ear-attached automated estrus detection system that recorded physical activity and rumination time. Overall, we observed an association between fertility group and the ovarian and hormonal phenotype of dairy cows during the estrous cycle. Cows in the Hi-Fert group had greater circulating concentrations of P4 than cows in the Lo-Fert group from d 4 to 13 after induction of ovulation and from day -3 to -1 before the onset of luteolysis. The frequency of atypical estrous cycles was 3-fold greater for cows in the Lo-Fert than the Hi-Fert group. We also observed other modest associations between genomic merit for fertility with the follicular dynamics and estrous behavior. We found several associations between milk yield and parity with ovarian, endocrine, and estrous behavior phenotypes as cows with greater milk yield and in the second lactation were more likely to have unfavorable phenotypes. These results demonstrate that differences in reproductive performance between cows of different genomic merit for fertility classified based on gDPR may be partially associated with circulating concentrations of P4, the incidence of atypical phenotypes during the estrous cycles, and, to a lesser extent, the follicular wave dynamics. The observed physiological and endocrine phenotypes might help explain part of the differences in reproductive performance between cows of superior and inferior genomic merit for fertility.

Combining reproductive outcomes predictors and automated estrus alerts recorded during the voluntary waiting period identified subgroups of cows with different reproductive performance potential

The objective was to compare differences in reproductive performance for dairy cows grouped based on the combination of data for predictors available during the prepartum period and before the end of the voluntary waiting period (VWP), automated estrus alerts (AEA) during the VWP, and the combination of both factors. In a cohort study, data for AEA and potential predictors of the percentage of cows that receive AI at detected estrus (AIE), pregnancies per AI (P/AI) for first service, and the percentage of cows pregnant by 150 DIM (P150) were collected from -21 to 49 DIM for lactating Holstein cows (n = 886). The association between each reproductive outcome with calving season (cool, warm), calving-related events (yes, no), genomic daughter pregnancy rate (gDPR; high, medium, low), days in the close-up pen (ideal, not ideal), health disorder events (yes, no), rumination time (high or low CV prepartum and high or low increase rate postpartum), and milk yield (MY) by 49 DIM (high, medium, low) were evaluated in univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Individual predictors (health disorders, gDPR, and MY) associated with the 3 reproductive outcomes in all models were used to group cows based on risk factors (RF; yes, n = 535 or no, n = 351) for poor reproductive performance. Specifically, cows were included in the RF group if any of the following conditions were met: the cow was in the high MY group, had low gDPR, or had at least 1 health disorder recorded. Cows were grouped into estrus groups during the VWP based on records of AEA (estrus VWP [E-VWP], n = 476 or no estrus VWP [NE-VWP], n = 410). Finally, based on the combination of levels of AEA and RF, cows were grouped into an estrus and no RF (E-NoRF, n = 217), no estrus and RF (NE-RF, n = 276), no estrus and no RF (NE-NoRF, n = 134), and estrus and RF (E-RF, n = 259) groups. Cows received AIE up to 31 d after the end of the VWP, and if they did not receive AIE, they received timed AI after an Ovsynch plus progesterone protocol. Logistic and Cox proportional hazard regression compared differences in reproductive outcomes for different grouping strategies. The NoRF (AIE: 76.9%; P/AI: 53.1%; P150: 84.5%) and E-VWP (AIE: 86.8%; P/AI: 44.8%; P150: 82.3%) groups had more cows AIE and higher P/AI and P150 than the RF (AIE: 64.5%; P/AI: 34.9%; P150: 72.9%) and NE-VWP (AIE: 50.0%; P/AI: 38.9%; P150: 72.1%) groups, respectively. When both factors were combined, the largest and most consistent differences were between the E-NoRF (AIE: 91.3%; P/AI: 58.7%; P150: 88.5%) and NE-RF groups (AIE: 47.3%; P/AI: 35.8%; P150: 69.5%). Compared with the whole population of cows or cows grouped based on a single factor, the E-NoRF and NE-RF groups had the largest and most consistent differences with the whole cow cohort. The E-NoRF and NE-RF groups also had statistically significant differences of a large magnitude when compared with the remaining cow cohort after removal of the respective group. We conclude that combining data for AEA during the VWP with other predictors of reproductive performance could be used to identify groups of cows with larger differences in expected reproductive performance than if AEA and the predictors are used alone.

Development and evaluation of predictive models for pregnancy risk in UK dairy cows

One suggested approach to improve the reproductive performance of dairy herds is through the targeted management of subgroups of biologically similar animals, such as those with similar probabilities of becoming pregnant, termed pregnancy risk. We aimed to use readily available farm data to develop predictive models of pregnancy risk in dairy cows. Data from a convenience sample of 108 dairy herds in the UK were collated and each herd was randomly allocated, at a ratio of 80:20, to either training or testing data sets. Following data cleaning, there were a total of 78 herds in the training data set and 20 herds in the testing data set. Data were further split by parity into nulliparous, primiparous, and multiparous subsets. An XGBoost model was trained to predict the insemination outcome in each parity subset, with predictors from farm records of breeding, calving and milk recording. Training data comprised 74,511 inseminations in 45,909 nulliparous animals, 86,420 inseminations in 39,439 primiparous animals, and 158,294 inseminations in 32,520 multiparous animals. The final models were evaluated by predicting with the testing data, comprising 31,740 inseminations in 19,647 nulliparous animals, 38,588 inseminations in 16,215 primiparous animals, and 65,049 inseminations in 12,439 multiparous animals. Model discrimination was assessed by calculating the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC); model calibration was assessed by plotting calibration curves and compared across test herds by calculating the expected calibration error (ECE) in each test herd. The models were unable to discriminate between insemination outcomes with high accuracy, with an AUC of 0.63, 0.59 and 0.62 in the nulliparous, primiparous and multiparous subsets, respectively. The models were generally well-calibrated, meaning the model-predicted pregnancy risks were similar to the observed pregnancy risks. The mean (SD) ECE in the test herds was 0.038 (0.023), 0.028 (0.012) and 0.020 (0.008) in the nulliparous, primiparous and multiparous subsets respectively. The predictive models reported here could theoretically be used to identify subgroups of animals with similar pregnancy risk to facilitate targeted reproductive management; or provide information about cows' relative pregnancy risk compared with the herd average, which may support on-farm decision-making. Further research is needed to evaluate the generalizability of these predictive models and understand the source of variation in ECE between herds; however, this study demonstrates that it is possible to accurately predict pregnancy risk in dairy cows using readily available farm data.

Design of a handheld and portable fluorescence imaging system for quantitative detection of pregnancy-specific biomarkers in cattle

Reproductive management significantly impacts dairy farm productivity, necessitating accurate timely pregnancy detection in cattle. This paper presents a novel handheld and portable fluorescence imaging system designed for quantitative assessment of pregnancy-specific biomarkers, addressing the limitations of current detection methods. The objective was to develop a cost-effective, at-farm solution for detecting pregnancy-specific protein B (PSPB) in bovine plasma samples. The system integrates an imaging module and a custom software application, enabling image capture, data processing, and PSPB concentration determination. Calibration utilizing known PSPB concentrations achieved a 0.6 ng/mL limit of detection. Validation encompassed a comparison with a standard ELISA method using 100 bovine plasma samples; minimal bias and good agreement were observed within the linear range of the calibration curve for both methods. The system offers portability, user-friendliness, and potential for multiplex detection, promising real-time, at-farm reproductive management. This study demonstrates the successful development and validation of a portable fluorescence imaging system, offering an efficient and accurate approach to detecting pregnancy-specific biomarkers in cattle. Its implications extend to improving dairy farm productivity by enabling timely and reliable reproductive management practices.

Graduate Student Literature Review: Implications of transition cow health for reproductive function and targeted reproductive management

Negative associations of health disorders with reproductive performance, often measured with pregnancy risk per artificial insemination (AI) or the risk of pregnancy loss, have been demonstrated extensively. Most studies investigated common clinical diseases but did not include subclinical disorders comprehensively. They often evaluated cows subjected to hormonal synchronization protocols for timed AI, limiting the ability to understand how disease may affect spontaneous reproductive function, which is essential for targeted management programs with selective hormonal intervention. It is plausible that metabolic and inflammatory disorders have short- and long-term detrimental effects on different features of reproductive function that result in or contribute to reduced fertility. These may include: 1) reestablishment of endocrine function to promote follicular growth and first ovulation postpartum, 2) corpus luteum (CL) function, 3) estrus expression, and 4) uterine environment, fertilization, and embryonic development. In this narrative literature review, we discuss insights and knowledge gaps linking health disorders with these processes of reproductive function. A growing set of observational studies with adequate internal validity suggest that these outcomes may be affected by metabolic and inflammatory disorders that are common in the early postpartum period. A better characterization of these risk factors in multi-site studies with greater external validity is warranted to develop decision-support tools to identify subgroups of cows that are more or less likely to be successful in targeted reproductive management programs.

Genome-wide association study identifies genomic regions associated with key reproductive traits in Korean Hanwoo cows

BACKGROUND

Conducting genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for reproductive traits in Hanwoo cattle, including age at first calving (AFC), calving interval (CI), gestation length (GL), and number of artificial inseminations per conception (NAIPC), is of paramount significance. These analyses provided a thorough exploration of the genetic basis of these traits, facilitating the identification of key markers for targeted trait improvement. Breeders can optimize their selection strategies, leading to more efficient and sustainable breeding programs, by incorporating genetic insights. This impact extends beyond individual traits and contributes to the overall productivity and profitability of the Hanwoo beef cattle industry. Ultimately, GWAS is essential in ensuring the long-term genetic resilience and adaptability of Hanwoo cattle populations. The primary goal of this study was to identify significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with the studied reproductive traits and subsequently map the underlying genes that hold promise for trait improvement.

RESULTS

A genome-wide association study of reproductive traits identified 68 significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) distributed across 29 Bos taurus autosomes (BTA). Among them, BTA14 exhibited the highest number of identified SNPs (25), whereas BTA6, BTA7, BTA8, BTA10, BTA13, BTA17, and BTA20 exhibited 8, 5, 5, 3, 8, 2, and 12 significant SNPs, respectively. Annotation of candidate genes within a 500 kb region surrounding the significant SNPs led to the identification of ten candidate genes relevant to age at first calving. These genes were: FANCG, UNC13B, TESK1, TLN1, and CREB3 on BTA8; FAM110B, UBXN2B, SDCBP, and TOX on BTA14; and MAP3K1 on BTA20. Additionally, APBA3, TCF12, and ZFR2, located on BTA7 and BTA10, were associated with the calving interval; PAX1, SGCD, and HAND1, located on BTA7 and BTA13, were linked to gestation length; and RBM47, UBE2K, and GPX8, located on BTA6 and BTA20, were linked to the number of artificial inseminations per conception in Hanwoo cows.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study enhance our knowledge of the genetic factors that influence reproductive traits in Hanwoo cattle populations and provide a foundation for future breeding strategies focused on improving desirable traits in beef cattle. This research offers new evidence and insights into the genetic variants and genome regions associated with reproductive traits and contributes valuable information to guide future efforts in cattle breeding.

Effect of a targeted reproductive management program based on automated detection of estrus during the voluntary waiting period on reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows

The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the effect on reproductive performance of a targeted reproductive management (TRM) program for first postpartum insemination (AI) that prioritized AI at detected estrus (AIE) by providing different intervals for estrus detection based on records of automated estrus alerts (AEA) during the voluntary waiting period (VWP). A secondary objective was to evaluate the association between occurrence of AEA during the VWP and reproductive performance. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 1,260) fitted with neck behavior monitoring sensors for detection of estrus were randomly assigned to a program that used all-timed AI (TAI) for first service (ALL-TAI; n = 632) or a TRM program that prioritized AIE and used TAI only for cows not detected in estrus (TP-AIE; n = 628). Cows in the ALL-TAI treatment received TAI at 76 ± 3 days in milk (DIM) after a Double-Ovsynch protocol. Cows in the TP-AIE treatment were eligible for AIE for 30 ± 3 or 16 ± 3 d after a 49 d VWP if at least one (n = 346) or no (n = 233) AEA were recorded from 15 to 49 DIM. Cows not AIE received TAI after an Ovsynch protocol with progesterone supplementation at 90 ± 3 or 76 ± 3 DIM if the cow had or did not have AEA during the VWP, respectively. Data were analyzed by logistic and Cox's proportional hazard regression. In the TP-AIE treatment, 69.3 % of cows received AIE and more cows with (83.3 %) than without (45.0 %) AEA during the VWP received AIE. Cows in the TP-AIE (69.0 ± 0.7 d) treatment had fewer days from calving to first AI than cows in the ALL-TAI (75.7 ± 0.8 d) treatment. The proportion of cows pregnant by 150 DIM (ALL-TAI = 59.1 % and TP-AIE = 56.0 %) and the hazard ratio (HR) for time to pregnancy (1.0 [95 % confidence interval: 0.9, 1.2]) did not differ between treatments and median days to pregnancy were 102 and 107 for the ALL-TAI and TP-AIE treatments, respectively. Overall, the ALL-TAI (42.3 %) treatment had more first service pregnancies per AI (P/AI) than the TP-AIE (29.0 %) treatment. Cows with AEA during the VWP had greater P/AI (42.5 % vs. 28.9 %), proportion of cows pregnant by 150 DIM (67.4 % vs. 47.0 %), and HR for time to pregnancy (1.6 [1.4, 1.9]) than cows without AEA during the VWP. We conclude that a TRM program that prioritized AIE based on AEA during the VWP led to a similar pregnancy rate and proportion of cows pregnant by mid-lactation than a program that used all-TAI with extended VWP despite fewer P/AI to first service. Also, expression of estrus during the VWP was associated with improved reproductive performance. Thus, AEA during the VWP could be used as a predictor of reproductive potential for TRM of lactating dairy cows.

Efficacy of an automated technology at detecting early postpartum estrus events: Can we detect resumption of cyclicity?

The objective of this observational study was to evaluate the efficacy of a neck-mounted automated activity monitor (AAM) at detecting early postpartum resumed ovarian cyclicity. A total of 192 lactating cows (primiparous = 73 and multiparous = 119) were enrolled in this study. Cows were continuously monitored by a neck-mounted AAM early postpartum (7 to 30 d in milk; DIM). Calving was classified as assisted (forced extraction of a calf) or unassisted (normal calving). Retained fetal membrane, metritis, hyperketonemia, clinical mastitis, and milk production were recorded. Cows were classified as healthy (i.e., no disease events) or sick (i.e., any disease event). Estrus events were alerted by the AAM using a proprietary algorithm set by the AAM company. Blood samples, from the coccygeal vein, were collected at 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, and 30 DIM for progesterone (P4) analysis. Resumption of cyclicity was considered when P4 concentration was ≥1 ng/mL on any collection day. Cows were considered anovular when P4 concentration was <1 ng/mL on all collection days. Cows were classified as true positive: P4 ≥ 1 ng/mL and at least one estrus alert; false positive: P4 < 1 ng/mL and at least one estrus alert; true negative: P4 < 1 ng/mL and no estrus alerts; and false negative: P4 ≥ 1 ng/mL and no estrus alerts. Statistical analyses were performed by frequency distribution and mixed effects logistic regression procedures on SAS (SAS Institute Inc.). The specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, and positive predictive value of the sensor to detect cows that had resumed cyclicity were 84.0%, 34.1%, 52.1%, and 79.2%, respectively. Out of the 192 cows, 35.9% (69/192) were anovulatory and 37.5% (72/192) had no estrus events between 7 to 30 DIM. Healthy cows were more likely to resume cyclicity in early lactation compared with cows that were sick (78.3 ± 1.9 vs. 32.8 ± 3.1%, respectively) independent of parity. In conclusion, the sensor had a high specificity for detecting anovular cows, but it had lower sensitivity, and thus was not effective at detecting cyclic cows, perhaps due to silent ovulation early postpartum.

Effect of postpartum body condition score change on the pregnancy outcomes of lactating Jersey cows inseminated at first service with sexed Jersey or conventional beef semen after a synchronized estrus versus a synchronized ovulation

Our objective was to compare insemination rate and pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI) of lactating Jersey cows inseminated at first service with sexed Jersey or conventional beef semen after submission to a Double-Ovsynch protocol for timed artificial insemination (TAI) versus a protocol to synchronize estrus at similar days in milk (DIM). Secondary objectives were to determine the effect of protocol synchrony and postpartum body condition score (BCS) change on P/AI. Lactating Jersey cows (n = 1,272) were allocated by odd versus even ear tag number, which was randomly allocated within the herd, within parity and semen type for submission to a Double-Ovsynch protocol (DO; n = 707) or a protocol to synchronize estrus (ED; n = 565). All ED cows detected in estrus were inseminated (EDAI; n = 424), with undetected cows receiving TAI after an Ovsynch protocol (EDTAI; n = 141). There was a treatment by parity interaction on insemination rate with 100% of DO cows receiving TAI, but a tendency for fewer primiparous ED cows to be detected in estrus and AI than multiparous cows (69.5% ± 0.04% vs. 77.1% ± 0.02%, respectively). For cows inseminated with sexed Jersey or conventional beef semen, DO cows tended to have and had more P/AI than EDAI cows (sexed, 49.2% ± 0.03% vs. 43.6% ± 0.03%; beef, 64.2% ± 0.04% vs. 56.3% ± 0.05%, respectively) and had more P/AI than EDAI+EDTAI cows (sexed, 49.1% ± 0.03% vs. 40.6% ± 0.03%; beef, 65.5% ± 0.04% vs. 56.2% ± 0.04%, respectively). Overall, 29.1% of DO cows expressed estrus with 5.0% and 24.2% of cows detected in estrus ≥24 h before and at TAI, respectively, and there was no difference in P/AI 61 ± 4 d after AI based on expression of estrus at TAI. The synchronization rate was greater for DO than EDAI cows (92.1% ± 0.01% vs. 79.2% ± 0.02%, respectively); however, synchronized DO cows had more P/AI than synchronized EDAI cows (55.0% ± 0.02% vs. 49.2% ± 0.03%, respectively). There was an interaction between BCS change from 7 to 39 ± 2 DIM and treatment on P/AI 61 ± 4 d after AI with no difference between DO and EDAI cows that lost = 0.25 (49.8% ± 0.04% vs. 51.0% ± 0.05%, respectively) or maintained or gained (55.6% ± 0.04% vs. 50.8% ± 0.05%, respectively) BCS, but within cows that lost ≥0.5 BCS, DO cows had more P/AI than EDAI cows (54.1% ± 0.04% vs. 36.1% ± 0.04%, respectively). In conclusion, submission of lactating Jersey cows to a Double-Ovsynch protocol for first insemination increased insemination rate and fertility to first insemination compared with AI after a detected estrus regardless of semen type and expression of estrus, particularly for cows with excessive postpartum BCS loss.

Postpartum health is associated with detection of estrus by activity monitors and reproductive performance in dairy cows

The objective of this prospective observational study was to investigate associations of postpartum health with estrus detection (ED) by activity monitors and pregnancy outcomes in dairy cows. A total of 1,743 Holstein cows from 2 commercial dairy herds in Ontario, Canada were enrolled 3 wk before expected parturition and examined for health variables until 9 wk postpartum. Body condition score (BCS) and lameness were measured at 3 wk prepartum, and serum concentrations of total Ca, haptoglobin (Hp), and nonesterified fatty acids were measured at 2 and 6 ± 2 d in milk (DIM), and blood β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) and metritis were assessed at 4, 8, 11, and 15 ± 2 DIM. Cows were examined for purulent vaginal discharge (PVD) and endometritis (ENDO) by endometrial cytology at wk 5, for lameness at wk 3 and 7, for BCS at wk 9 postpartum, and for time to onset of cyclicity by biweekly serum progesterone (P4) measurements. Additional disease data were obtained from farm records. Reproductive management for first AI was primarily based on ED by activity monitors until at least 75 DIM, and cows not detected in estrus were synchronized. Data were analyzed in multivariable logistic or Cox proportional hazards regression models including blood markers, health variables, potential covariates, and herd as a random effect. Estrus was detected in 77% of primiparous and 66% of multiparous cows between 50 or 55 DIM and 75 DIM. In 1,246 cows, the model-predicted probability of ED (percentage point difference) was lower in cows that had retained placenta (-14%), ENDO (-7%), PVD (-8%), delayed cyclicity (no P4 > 1 ng/mL by wk 9; -12%), or ≥0.5-point BCS loss (-14%) compared with cows without each of these risk factors, and it was negatively associated with blood BHB at 15 DIM. Considering only variables measured on farm (not requiring laboratory analysis), the probability of ED was lower (56 vs. 81%) in cows with >1 risk factor compared with cows without risk factors. The predicted probability of pregnancy at first artificial insemination (percentage point difference) was lower in cows that had ENDO (-7%) or PVD (-7%), and negatively associated with serum Hp at 6 ± 2 DIM. In cows detected in estrus by 75 DIM (n = 888), risk factors for reduced pregnancy rate by 250 DIM (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR); 95% confidence intervals) included difficult calving (AHR: 0.67; 0.45 to 1.00), metritis (AHR: 0.79; 0.61 to 1.01), PVD (AHR: 0.79; 0.65 to 0.97), or lameness (AHR: 0.79; 0.62 to 1.01), and it was negatively associated with serum Hp at 6 ± 2 DIM. Monitoring postpartum health may be used to identify cows that are more or less likely to be detected in estrus by activity monitors and to become pregnant in a timely manner. This would support a selective reproductive management program with targeted interventions.

Effect of reproductive management programs that prioritized artificial insemination at detected estrus or timed artificial insemination on the economic performance of primiparous Holstein cows of different genetic merit for fertility

The objective of this randomized controlled experiment was to evaluate the effect of reproductive management programs that prioritized artificial insemination (AI) at detected estrus (AIE) or timed AI (TAI) during the first lactation on the economic performance of dairy cows of different genomically enhanced predicted transmitting ability for fertility. Lactating primiparous Holstein cows from 6 commercial farms were stratified into high, medium, and low fertility groups based on a reproduction index value calculated from multiple genomically enhanced predicted transmitting abilities to predict the number of days to achieve pregnancy. Within herd and fertility group, cows were randomly assigned either to a program that prioritized AIE (P-AIE; n = 1,416) and used TAI for cows not AIE for all AI services or another that prioritized TAI and had an extended voluntary waiting period for first service and prioritized TAI for second and greater AI services (P-TAI; n = 1,338). Cash flow (CF) per cow accumulated for the experimental (first) and second calving interval (CIN) and cash flow per slot per 28 mo after calving in the experimental lactation were calculated. Market and rearing heifer cost values were used for estimating CF. For cows in the high fertility group, a positive effect of delayed pregnancy on milk income during the first lactation was observed (+$248 for P-TAI) but was insufficient to generate significant differences in CF between treatments mainly because of milk income compensation in the second lactation (+$125 for P-AIE) and minor reductions in reproductive cost and gains in calf value for the P-AIE treatment. In this regard, CF for 2 CIN was greater for the P-TAI treatment by $61 and $86 for market and rearing replacement heifer cost, respectively. Similarly, CF per slot was favorable to the P-TAI treatment but only by $13 and $47 for market and rearing replacement heifer cost, respectively. For cows in the low fertility group, CF was numerically in favor of the P-AIE treatment due to a pregnancy and herd exit dynamics that resulted in gains in milk income over feed cost during the first ($29) and second ($113) lactation. Differences in CF for the 2 CIN were $58 and $47 for market or rearing heifer value, respectively, and $77 and $19 for market and rearing heifer values, respectively for the slot analysis. Differences in CF between cows of different genetic merit for fertility were consistent across treatment and estimation method. Of note, cows in the low fertility group had greater CF than cows in the high fertility group in all comparisons, ranging from $198 per cow for 2 CIN to as much as $427 per slot. For the low fertility group, greater milk production contributed directly (milk income over feed cost) and indirectly (reduced culling) to increased CF. We concluded that genetic merit for fertility and CF are associated because cows of inferior genetic potential for fertility had greater CF than cows of superior genetic for fertility despite some increased costs and reduced revenues. Also, the magnitude of the CF differences observed for cows of different genetic merit for fertility managed with the P-AIE or P-TAI program may be valuable to commercial dairy farms but did not allow to conclusively support the choice of a type of reproductive management strategy for cows of different genetic merit for fertility.

Effect of reproductive management programs that prioritized artificial insemination at detected estrus or timed artificial insemination on the reproductive performance of primiparous Holstein cows of different genetic merit for fertility

Our objective was to compare reproductive outcomes of primiparous lactating Holstein cows of different genetic merit for fertility submitted for insemination with management programs that prioritized artificial insemination (AI) at detected estrus (AIE) or timed AI (TAI). Moreover, we aimed to determine whether subgroups of cows with different fertility potential would present a distinct response to the reproductive management strategies compared. Lactating primiparous Holstein cows (n = 6 commercial farms) were stratified into high (Hi-Fert), medium (Med-Fert), and low (Lo-Fert) genetic fertility groups (FG) based on a Reproduction Index value calculated from multiple genomic-enhanced predicted transmitting abilities. Within herd and FG, cows were randomly assigned either to a program that prioritized TAI and had an extended voluntary waiting period (P-TAI; n = 1,338) or another that prioritized AIE (P-AIE; n = 1,416) and used TAI for cows, not AIE. Cows in P-TAI received first service by TAI at 84 ± 3 d in milk (DIM) after a Double-Ovsynch protocol, were AIE if detected in estrus after a previous AI, and received TAI after an Ovsynch-56 protocol at 35 ± 3 d after a previous AI if a corpus luteum (CL) was visualized at nonpregnancy diagnosis (NPD) 32 ± 3 d after AI. Cows with no CL visualized at NPD received TAI at 42 ± 3 d after AI after an Ovsynch-56 protocol with progesterone supplementation (P4-Ovsynch). Cows in P-AIE were eligible for AIE after a PGF2α treatment at 53 ± 3 DIM and after a previous AI. Cows not AIE by 74 ± 3 DIM or by NPD 32 ± 3 d after AI received P4-Ovsynch for TAI at 74 ± 3 DIM or 42 ± 3 d after AI. Binary data were analyzed with logistic regression, count data with Poisson regression, continuous data by ANOVA, and time to event data by Cox's proportional hazard regression. Pregnancy per AI (P/AI) to first service was greater for cows in the Hi-Fert (59.8%) than the Med-Fert (53.6%) and Lo-Fert (47.7%) groups, and for the P-TAI (58.7%) than the P-AIE (48.7%) treatment. Overall, P/AI for all second and subsequent AI combined did not differ by treatment (P-TAI = 45.2%; P-AIE = 44.5%) or FG (Hi-Fert = 46.1%; Med-Fert = 46.0%; Lo-Fert = 42.4%). The hazard of pregnancy after calving was greater for the P-AIE than the P-TAI treatment [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.37)], and for the Hi-Fert than the Med-Fert (HR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.28) and Lo-Fert (HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.49) groups. More cows in the Hi-Fert (91.2%) than the Med-Fert (88.4%) and Lo-Fert (85.8%) groups were pregnant at 200 DIM. Within FG, the hazard of pregnancy was greater for the P-AIE than the P-TAI treatment for the Hi-Fert (HR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.22 to 1.64) and Med-Fert (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.46) groups but not for the Lo-Fert group (HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.31). We conclude that primiparous Holstein cows of superior genetic merit for fertility had better reproductive performance than cows of inferior genetic merit for fertility, regardless of the type of reproductive management used. In addition, the effect of programs that prioritized AIE or TAI on reproductive performance for cows of superior or inferior genetic merit for fertility depended on the outcomes evaluated. Thus, programs that prioritize AIE or TAI could be used to affect certain outcomes of reproductive performance or management.

Precision Livestock Farming: What Does It Contain and What Are the Perspectives?

Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) describes the combined use of sensor technology, the related algorithms, interfaces, and applications in animal husbandry. PLF technology is used in all animal production systems and most extensively described in dairy farming. PLF is developing rapidly and is moving beyond health alarms towards an integrated decision-making system. It includes animal sensor and production data but also external data. Various applications have been proposed or are available commercially, only a part of which has been evaluated scientifically; the actual impact on animal health, production and welfare therefore remains largely unknown. Although some technology has been widely implemented (e.g., estrus detection and calving detection), other systems are adopted more slowly. PLF offers opportunities for the dairy sector through early disease detection, capturing animal-related information more objectively and consistently, predicting risks for animal health and welfare, increasing the efficiency of animal production and objectively determining animal affective states. Risks of increasing PLF usage include the dependency on the technology, changes in the human-animal relationship and changes in the public perception of dairy farming. Veterinarians will be highly affected by PLF in their professional life; they nevertheless must adapt to this and play an active role in further development of technology.

Associations of automated body condition scores at dry-off and through early lactation with milk yield of Holstein cows

The objective of this study was to analyze the associations of body condition score (BCS) and BCS change (∆BCS) during the dry period and the first 100 d of lactation with daily milk yield. Examining the involvement of health status in the associations between BCS and milk yield was a secondary objective of this research. Data included 12,042 lactations in 7,626 Holstein cows calving between April 2019 and January 2022 in a commercial dairy operation located in Colorado, USA. BCSs were generated daily by an automated BCS camera system located at the exit of the milking parlor. The assessment points selected for this study were dry-off (BCSdry), calving (BCS1), 7 DIM (BCS7), 14 DIM (BCS14), 21 DIM (BCS21), and nadir (nBCS; defined as the lowest daily BCS from calving to 100 DIM). Subsequently, these BCS were categorized considering quartiles (Q1 = 25% lowest BCS; Q4 = 25% greatest BCS), separately for primiparous and multiparous cows. Changes in BCS were calculated from dry-off to calving (multiparous); and from calving to 7 DIM, 14 DIM, 21 DIM, and nadir and assigned into quartile categories considering Q1 as the 25% of cows with the greatest decrease of BCS. Lactations were classified based on the number of health events before nadir as healthy, affected by one event, or having multiple events. Data were examined in primiparous and multiparous cows separately using ANOVA. The least square means for daily milk at 60 DIM and 305 DIM were calculated by category of BCS and ∆BCS at multiple time points and time periods. Subsequently, lactation curves were created by BCS and ∆BCS categories and by health status. Multivariable models included calving season and BCS1 as covariables. The largest differences in milk yield among categories of BCS and ∆BCS were identified for BCS originated at nadir and for the ∆BCS between calving and nadir. The differences in average daily milk yield between cows in the lowest and the greatest nBCS category (Q1 vs. Q4) were 3.3 kg/d (60 DIM) and 3.4 kg/d (305 DIM) for primiparous cows and 2.4 kg/d (60 DIM) and 2.1 kg/d (305 DIM) for multiparous cows. During the period from calving to nadir, primiparous cows in Q1 (greatest decrease of BCS) produced 4.3 kg/d (60 DIM) and 3.8 kg/d (305 DIM) more than cows in Q4. For multiparous cows, the differences were 3.0 kg/d (60 DIM) and 1.9 kg/d (305 DIM) in favor of Q1 cows. Overall, the associations between BCS and ∆BCS categories and milk yield were not consistent across time and they depended on the parity category. Nonetheless, as the assessment of BCS and ∆BCS approached the nadir, the association between greater milk yield and lower BCS or greater reduction in BCS became more evident.

Pregnancies following Protocols for Repetitive Synchronization of Ovulation in Primiparous Buffaloes in Different Seasons

Simple Summary

Artificial Insemination (AI) is mainly used after estrus synchronization in buffalo, and consecutive synchronization protocols are used to enhance reproductive efficiency. In this study, two different synchronization protocols have been used: Ovsynch vs. a P₄-administration, and their efficiency in primiparous animals has been evaluated in different seasons for up to four cycles of re-synchronization protocols. Results show that the pregnancy rate upon the initial AI tends to be higher in P₄ treated buffaloes, and that AI efficiency after re-synchronization through P₄ is higher than the Ovsynch protocol. In conclusion, synchronization treatments must be selected according to the season of the year. The results derived from this study could be useful for buffalo breeders who want to improve the reproductive efficiency in primiparous animals in commercially managed buffalo herds.

Abstract

Primiparous buffaloes were tested in two periods of the year characterized, by either low or high reproductive efficiency. They were subjected to two protocols for synchronization of ovulation: (i) Ovsynch (OV) and (ii) progesterone based (P₄) treatment. After calving, the animals underwent a series of four cycles of re-synchronization protocols. The season did not affect pregnancy rates when the results of the two treatments were pooled together with regard to the first synchronization protocol, followed by AI. Pregnancy rates were similar during the low breeding season (50.3% vs. 57.4% in OV and P₄, respectively), but different during the high breeding season (50.4% vs. 67.7% in OV and P₄, respectively; p = 0.000). Logistic regression confirmed a significant effect of treatment and season interaction on pregnancy (p = 0.003). Following re-synchronization, a treatment by season interaction was detected during the low breeding season (odds ratio = 2.233), in favor of P₄. Finally, a survival analysis showed a better response of animals subjected to P₄ treatment from the second AI onward. In conclusion, the pooled data of pregnancy rates from both treatments between seasons are not different following AIs. Better results, though, were obtained from the implementation of P₄ treatment, and are recorded in a season-fashioned mode when the comparison is made following first or cumulative AIs.

Effect of a targeted reproductive management program designed to prioritize insemination at detected estrus and optimize time to insemination on the reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows

The primary objective of this randomized controlled experiment was to evaluate the insemination dynamic and reproductive performance of cows managed with a targeted reproductive management (TRM) program designed to prioritize artificial insemination (AI) at detected estrus (AIE) and optimize timing of AI by grouping cows based on detection of estrus during the voluntary waiting period (VWP). Our secondary objective was to evaluate reproductive outcomes for cows with or without estrus during the VWP. Lactating Holstein cows fitted with an ear-attached sensor for detection of estrus were randomly assigned to a TRM treatment that prioritized AIE based on detection of estrus during the VWP (TP-AIE; n = 488), a non-TRM treatment that prioritized AIE (P-AIE; n = 489), or an all-timed AI (TAI) treatment with extended VWP (ALL-TAI; n = 491). In TP-AIE, cows with or without automated estrus alerts (AEA) recorded during the VWP received AIE if detected in estrus for at least 31 ± 3 or 17 ± 3 d after a 49 d VWP, respectively. Cows not AIE with or without AEA during the VWP received TAI after Ovsynch with progesterone supplementation and 2 PGF_2α treatments (P4-Ov) at 90 ± 3 or 74 ± 3 d in milk (DIM), respectively. In P-AIE, cows received AIE if detected in estrus for 24 ± 3 d after a 49 d VWP, and if not AIE received TAI at 83 ± 3 DIM after P4-Ov. In ALL-TAI, cows received TAI at 83 ± 3 DIM after a Double-Ovsynch protocol. Data were analyzed by logistic and Cox's proportional hazard regression. The proportion of cows AIE did not differ for TP-AIE (71.0%) and P-AIE (74.6%). Overall P/AI at 39 d after first service was greater for the ALL-TAI (47.6%) than for the P-AIE (40.2%) and TP-AIE (39.5%) treatments. The hazard of pregnancy up to 150 DIM was greater for cows in TP-AIE (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.4) and P-AIE (hazard ratio = 1.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.4) than for cows in the ALL-TAI treatment which resulted in median time to pregnancy of 89, 89, and 107 d. Conversely, the proportion of cows pregnant at 150 DIM did not differ (ALL-TAI 78.5%, P-AIE 76.3%, TP-AIE 76.0%). Except for a few outcomes for which no difference was observed, cows detected in estrus during the VWP had better performance than cows not detected in estrus. Cows with AEA during the VWP were more likely to receive AIE, had greater P/AI, and greater pregnancy rate up to 150 DIM regardless of first service management. We conclude that a TRM program designed to prioritize AIE by grouping cows based on detection of estrus during the VWP was an effective strategy to submit cows for first service resulting in similar or improved performance than a non-TRM program that prioritized AIE or an all-TAI program with extended VWP. Also, AEA recorded during the VWP might be used as a strategy for identifying subgroups of cows with different reproductive performance.