Enzyme assisted ensiling of alfalfa with enzymes by solid substrate fermentation

A crude enzyme preparation, obtained by solid substrate fermentation (SSF) with a Gliocladium spp. and added at the 5% level to wilted or non-wilted alfalfa, improved the fermentation characteristics and stability of alfalfa silages as effectively as commercial preparations, Novo-Nordisk Celluclast 1.5 L and Viscozyme 120 L, applied at the 0.025% level. The effective dose of the crude enzyme costs about one-fourth of the cost of the commercial enzymes.

Effect of direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on the lactational performance of dairy cows

In trial 1, 30 midlactation (213 d in milk) Holstein cows were randomly assigned to a control or enzyme treatment in a two-period crossover design and were fed a total mixed ration based on alfalfa hay and silage. Cows on the enzyme treatment received an enzyme solution containing cellulases and xylanases, which was sprayed on the forage component of the ration at a rate of 1.65 ml/kg of forage dry matter (DM) between 8 and 24 h prior to feeding. Cows consuming the forage treated with enzyme produced more milk (27.2 vs. 25.9 kg/d) and digested more DM per day than did cows fed the control forage. In trial 2, 40 early lactation Holstein cows were assigned to one of four treatments for 16 wk. Following a 2-wk covariate period, cows were assigned to 1) no enzyme treatment, 2) a low (1.25 ml/kg of forage DM) enzyme treatment, 3) a medium (2.5 ml/kg of forage DM) enzyme treatment, or 4) a high (5.0 ml/kg of forage DM) enzyme treatment. Enzymes were a 2:1 combination of cellulase and xylanase diluted in water and sprayed on a combination of alfalfa hay and silage and whole cottonseed immediately before mixing with a concentrate based on barley. Dry matter intakes were similar for cows on treatments 2, 3, and 4 and were greater than those for cows on treatment 1. Production of milk, 3.5% fat-corrected milk, and energy-corrected milk was greater for cows on treatment 3 than for cows on treatment 1. Fibrolytic enzymes applied to the forage portion of the rations prior to feeding improved lactational performance of early and midlactation cows.

Intake, milk yield, and digestion by dairy cows fed diets with increasing fiber content from bermudagrass hay of silage

Lactating dairy cows were offered diets containing increasing quantities of Tifton 85 bermudagrass hay or silage and increasing dietary neutral detergent fiber (NDF) to determine effects of method of bermudagrass storage and dietary fiber content on intake, milk yield, and nutrient digestion. Bermudagrass was added as hay or silage at the rate of 8.5, 15.9, or 23.3% of dietary dry matter and was substituted for an equal quantity of corn silage. The method of bermudagrass storage did not affect intake [20.8 vs. 20.3 (+/- 0.3) kg/d for bermudagrass hay and silage diets; respectively], but an increase in the amount of bermudagrass and NDF in the diet did reduce intake. Dietary NDF concentration was well above minimum recommendations of the National Research Council. Milk yield was not altered by method of bermudagrass storage but declined as dietary NDF increased. Digestion of NDF tended to be lower for bermudagrass silage than for bermudagrass hay. An increase in the amount of bermudagrass in the diet improved digestion of dietary dry matter, acid detergent fiber, and NDF; however, milk yield declined because total intake declined. Improved NDF digestion caused by added bermudagrass hay or silage was confirmed by in vitro analyses. High quality bermudagrass hybrids could potentially be used in diets of lactating dairy cows because of the good digestion characteristics and relatively small effects on intake despite the high dietary fiber content. Tifton 85 bermudagrass may serve as a forage alternative for lactating dairy cows.