Nonendoscopic, minimally invasive calvarial vault remodeling without postoperative helmeting for sagittal synostosis

Evaluating mechanical benefit of wedge osteotomies in endoscopic surgery for sagittal synostosis using patient-specific 3D-printed models

PURPOSE

Endoscopically assisted sagittal strip craniotomy with subsequent cranial orthosis is a frequently used surgical approach for non-syndromic sagittal synostosis. Originally, this technique involved a wide sagittal strip craniectomy with bilateral wedge osteotomies. More recent studies suggest omitting wedge osteotomies, achieving similar outcomes. The controversy surrounding wedge osteotomies and our efforts to refine our technique led us to create models and evaluate the mechanical impact of wedge osteotomies.

METHODS

We conducted a 3D-print study involving preoperative CT scans of non-syndromic scaphocephaly patients undergoing minimally invasive-assisted remodelation (MEAR) surgery. The sagittal strip collected during surgery underwent thickness measurement, along with a 3-point bending test. These results were used to determine printing parameters for accurately replicating the skull model. Model testing simulated gravitational forces during the postoperative course and assessed lateral expansion under various wedge osteotomy conditions.

RESULTS

The median sagittal strip thickness was 2.00 mm (range 1.35-3.46 mm) and significantly positively correlated (p = 0.037) with the median force (21.05 N) of the 3-point bending test. Model testing involving 40 models demonstrated that biparietal wedge osteotomies significantly reduced the force required for lateral bone shift, with a trend up to 5-cm-long cuts (p = 0.007). Additional cuts beyond this length or adding the occipital cut did not provide further significant advantage (p = 0.1643; p = 9.6381).

CONCLUSION

Biparietal wedge osteotomies reduce the force needed for lateral expansion, provide circumstances for accelerated head shape correction, and potentially reduce the duration of cranial orthosis therapy.

Child-Patient Perspective on Results After Correction of Sagittal Synostosis and the Difference Between Child-Patient and Parent's Perspectives

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses the level of child-patient satisfaction with the surgical result after scaphocephaly correction and the difference between child-patient and parents' perspectives.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent out to children between 6 and 18 years old with isolated sagittal synostosis, who had undergone either a frontobiparietal remodeling or extended strip craniotomy, and separately to their parents.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was completed by 96 patients, 81.2% of the patients considered their head to be similar or slightly different from others. Despite the majority being satisfied with the outcome, 33% would change the shape of their head if they could. Patients who underwent extended strip craniotomy wanted to change the back of their head more often ( P = 0.002), whereas patients who underwent frontobiparietal remodeling wanted to change their forehead ( P = 0.005). The patients' own perspective on head shape was independent of the cephalic index (CI). However, patients with a relatively narrow CI received more remarks from others about their heads ( P = 0.038). Parent and child agreement was 49.7% on average. Differences between child-patients and parents were found in reporting adaptive behavior.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients were satisfied with the outcome of their intervention. The child's perspective seems to be a valuable addition to evaluate sagittal synostosis surgery as it is independent of the CI and differentiates between different surgical techniques. In addition, the patient's perspective is comparable to the parent's perspective, but gives more details on adaptive behavior.

Endoscopy-Assisted Craniosynostosis Surgery without Postoperative Helmet Molding Therapy

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopy-assisted craniosynostosis surgery (EACS) yields excellent surgical outcomes by minimizing blood loss, operative time, and hospital stays. Postoperative helmet therapy (PHT), commonly employed for head shape correction, involves frequent adjustments, potential complications, and high costs. Given the rising cost of helmet therapy, reduced insurance coverage, and limited availability in low- and middle-income countries, understanding success rates without helmet use is crucial. The present study analyses the anthropometric results of the first EACS series without PHT.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a single-center series involving 90 consecutive patients who underwent EACS without PHT from 2012 to 2022 was conducted, with a follow-up exceeding 3 years. The study exclusively included patients with nonsyndromic isolated sagittal synostosis, with 33 meeting the criteria. Craniometric measurements were obtained from preoperative, 1-year postoperative, and the latest computed tomography scans. For isolated sagittal synostosis cases, the cephalic index (CI) was calculated (CI >75 for excellent results, CI 70-75 for good results, and <70 for poor results). Collected data encompassed patient sex, age, and follow-up time.

RESULTS

The mean age was 84.8 ± 45.3 days (2.79 ± 1.49 months) within a range of 3-172 days. The preoperative mean CI was 68 ± 42, increasing to 76 ± 6 1 year postoperatively (mean difference +8 ± 6.3; P = 0.0001). Seventy-one percent of patients achieved excellent results, 23% good (CI = 70-75), and 6% poor. Reintervention was unnecessary.

CONCLUSIONS

EACS without PHT demonstrates favorable anthropometric results, cost reduction, and simplified postoperative management.

Cosmetic satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes following surgical treatment of single-suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This study provides a systematic review on cosmetic satisfaction and other patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) of patients who underwent surgical treatment of SSC.

METHODS

A systematic review of all articles published from inception to 1 June 2022 was performed. Articles were included if they reported on subjective assessment of cosmetic satisfaction or other PROMs by patients or their families using questionnaires or interviews.

RESULTS

Twelve articles, describing 724 surgical treatments of SSC, met the inclusion criteria. Cosmetic satisfaction was evaluated in the following ways: 1) use of the VAS score, binary questions or a 5-point scale to rate general, facial or skull appearance; 2) use of an aesthetic outcome staging in which personal opinion was added to the treating surgeon's opinion; and 3) use of an evaluation of anatomical proportions of the skull and face. A trend towards an overall improvement in cosmetic satisfaction following surgical treatment of SSC was observed. Reported PROMs included general health, socioeconomic status, patients' and their families' rating of the normalcy and noticeability of their appearance and how much this bothered them, and patients' answers to the Youth Quality of Life with Facial Differences (YQOL-FD) questionnaire. No clear overall trend of the reported PROMs was identified.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review illuminates that there is a wide variation in outcomes for evaluating cosmetic satisfaction and other PROMs of patients who underwent surgical treatment of SSC, suggesting that further research is needed to develop an inclusive and uniform approach to assess these outcomes.

Minimally invasive endoscopically assisted remodelation (MEAR) of sagittal craniosynostosis: an alternative technique to open and endoscopic procedures with cranial orthosis time span reduction

INTRODUCTION

Sagittal craniosynostosis represents the most frequent simplex skull suture pathology. There are currently several operative approaches to this defect. Minimally invasive techniques are preferred for young infants. Since July 2017, we have employed endoscopically assisted craniectomies followed by cranial orthosis. Gradually, we have developed our modified technique, the minimally invasive endoscopically assisted remodelation (MEAR).

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

MEAR is a combination of principles gained from classical cranial vault remodeling techniques and minimal invasive approaches. The long and wider lateral osteoectomies performed in the parietal and occipital bones along with loosening of the periosteum and dura adhesions at the lambdoid sutures lead to early correction of parieto-occipital dimensions.

RESULTS

Thirty-one consecutive patients with scaphocephaly underwent MEAR. The median preoperative cephalic index of 67 units (P25:63.3, P75:70) was improved to a median postoperative cephalic index of 77 units (P25:75, P75: 81). Sufficient correction was achieved in all patients. Cranial orthosis was needed for a median of 1.5 months (P25:1, P75:2). We had no major surgical complications in this pilot series.

CONCLUSIONS

With MEAR, we have achieved good cosmetic results. Duration of cranial orthosis was significantly shortened compared to conventional endoscopic-assisted procedures.

Sagittal craniosynostosis associated with midline cephalhematoma or vice versa, case report and a review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Sagittal craniosynostosis associated with midline cephalhematoma is a rare finding. Despite the controversy regarding its etiopathogenesis, this condition represents a clear indication for surgery.

CASE REPORT

We present a case of a 10-week-old boy with an ossified midline vertex cephalhematoma and sagittal craniosynostosis. The child underwent a cephalhematoma excision and minimally invasive non-endoscopic narrow vertex craniectomy, with calvarial vault remodeling followed by 2 weeks use of a cranial orthosis. On 5-month follow-up, mesocephaly was achieved.

CONCLUSION

Our case is well documented with native CT, 3D CT, intraoperative pictures, and 3D head scan imaging. We described our minimally invasive non-endoscopic technique that led to a rapid cranial vault remodeling with reduction of cranial orthosis need. A review of literature focused on surgical techniques is included.

A New Technique for Sagittal Synostosis: A Plurality of Small Incisions Minimally Invasive Technique Used on Infants and Young Patients

OBJECTIV

The authors devised a multiple small incisions minimally invasive technique for use in isolated nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis to achieve better esthetic effect and satisfactory reshaping of the calvarial vault. The purpose of this study is to provide clinicians with new and feasible solution.

METHODS

From April 2016 to January 2017, 5 male patients were successfully treated with minimally invasive surgery. The age ranges from 1.5 to 3.3 years. The authors designed 9 short skin linear incisions (2-3 cm long) strategically to disperse in the scalp. The patient was assessed in a series including sex, age of surgery, blood loss, blood transfusion, duration of surgery, postoperative complications, preoperative and postoperative cephalic index (CI), length of stay (LOS), esthetic outcomes, and intellectual developmental quotient (DQ).

RESULTS

The shortest operation time is 1.5 hours. The shortest hospital stay is 6 days. The blood loss ranged from 135 to 280 mL. No serious complications occurred during the follow-up time. Postoperative 3-dimensional CT scan showed that the extensive floating bone formed well. Preoperative CI ranged from 64.2 to 68 and postoperatively 69.4 to 74.3. Mental development was tested by children heath care practioners, significantly improving DQ from 67 to 81 preoperatively and 76 to 90 postoperatively. All children receive good esthetic results.

CONCLUSION

The new technique is safe and effective. The advantages are satisfactory: calvarial fornix remodeling, less visible appearance of scars, shorter length of surgery, lower mental and financial stress, optimal age for surgery, no endoscopic adjuvant and postoperative helmet are needed.

The value of three-dimensional photogrammetry in isolated sagittal synostosis: Impact of age and surgical technique on intracranial volume and cephalic index─a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of intracranial volume (ICV) and cephalic index (CI) between two different techniques for surgical therapy of sagittal synostosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2011 and 2015, all patients scheduled for surgical therapy of sagittal synostosis were consecutively enrolled. All patients younger than 6 months underwent early extended strip craniectomy (ESC group), and patients older than 6 months underwent late modified pi-procedure (MPP group). To measure ICV and CI, data acquisition was performed via three-dimensional photogrammetry, 1 day before (T0) and between 10 and 12 weeks after surgery (T1). Results were compared with an age-matched reference group of healthy children. Perioperative parameters, as duration of surgery and the amount of blood loss of both surgical procedures were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients were enrolled. Of the patients, 48 underwent an extended strip craniotomy with parietal osteotomies and biparietal widening and 37 patients underwent a late modified pi-procedure. There was no significant difference between the ESC group and the MPP group regarding the efficacy of improving CI (p > 0.05). Both techniques were able to normalize CI and to improve head shape. ICV was normal compared to age-matched norm-groups with both techniques, pre- and postoperatively. However, duration of the surgical procedure and calculated blood loss were significantly lower in the ESC group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ESC and MPP were effective techniques to normalize cephalic index (CI) and improve head shape at their recommended time of surgery. Measurement of ICV and CI with 3D photogrammetry is a valid method to objectively evaluate patients before and after surgery without exposing pediatric patients to ionizing radiation.

A proposal for a new classification of complications in craniosynostosis surgery

OBJECTIVE Complications have been used extensively to facilitate evaluation of craniosynostosis practice. However, description of complications tends to be nonstandardized, making comparison difficult. The authors propose a new pragmatic classification of complications that relies on prospective data collection, is geared to capture significant morbidity as well as any "near misses" in a systematic fashion, and can be used as a quality improvement tool. METHODS Data on complications for all patients undergoing surgery for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis between 2010 and 2015 were collected from a prospective craniofacial audit database maintained at the authors' institution. Information on comorbidities, details of surgery, and follow-up was extracted from medical records, anesthetic and operation charts, and electronic databases. Complications were defined as any unexpected event that resulted or could have resulted in a temporary or permanent damage to the child. RESULTS A total of 108 operations for the treatment of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis were performed in 103 patients during the 5-year study period. Complications were divided into 6 types: 0) perioperative occurrences; 1) inpatient complications; 2) outpatient complications not requiring readmission; 3) complications requiring readmission; 4) unexpected long-term deficit; and 5) mortality. These types were further subdivided according to the length of stay and time after discharge. The overall complication rate was found to be 35.9%. CONCLUSIONS The proportion of children with some sort of complication using the proposed definition was much higher than commonly reported, predominantly due to the inclusion of problems often dismissed as minor. The authors believe that these complications should be included in determining complication rates, as they will cause distress to families and may point to potential areas for improving a surgical service.

Intracranial volume (ICV) in isolated sagittal craniosynostosis measured by 3D photocephalometry: A new perspective on a controversial issue

BACKGROUND

There are still controversies regarding the intracranial volumes in patients with isolated sagittal craniosynostosis compared to a healthy population. This study aimed to compare the intracranial volume of children with sagittal synostosis and scaphocephaly to an age- and gender-matched control cohort using three-dimensional (3D) photogrammetry.

METHODS

62 boys and nine girls with sagittal craniosynostosis were included in this study. The intracranial volume was measured at the first clinical presentation. However, 3D photogrammetry was performed at children not younger than 3 months. The 3D photogrammetric data of 547 healthy boys and 287 healthy girls between the ages of 3-10 month was analyzed to establish an age- and gender-matched control group.

RESULTS

Male patients with sagittal synostosis showed a significantly reduced intracranial volume compared to the reference group. For female patients, the intracranial volume was slightly lower compared to the norm group, but not significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Male children with sagittal synostosis showed significantly decreased intracranial volume between the age of 3 and 10 months compared to an age- and gender-matched control group. Female patients in the same age group presented a lower intracranial volume compared to the norm group. Measuring intracranial volume using 3D photogrammetry is a comparable and valuable alternative to CT scans that leads to a significant reduction of radiation exposure to the growing brain.

Frontobiparietal remodeling with or without a widening bridge for sagittal synostosis: comparison of 2 cohorts for aesthetic and functional outcome

OBJECT Various techniques to correct sagittal synostosis have been described. The authors of this study assess the results of 2 techniques for late complete cranial remodeling and test the hypothesis that adding a widening bridge would improve outcome. METHODS In this retrospective study, the authors evaluated patients with nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis-those who underwent frontobiparietal remodeling (FBR) and those who underwent modified FBR (MFBR) involving the introduction of a bony bridge to increase the width of the skull. Outcomes for both groups are described in terms of the aesthetic results assessed on photographs and any changes in the cranial index (CI) and head circumference over time, the presence of papilledema, and complaints of headache. The effect of the surgical technique on CI and head circumference over time was assessed using linear regression analysis, with adjustment for preoperative CI and head circumference. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients with isolated sagittal synostosis were included in this study: 35 underwent MFBR and 34 underwent the original technique of FBR. The mean follow-up period was 7 years. In the 1st year after surgery, mean CI improved by 9% in the FBR group and by 12% in the MFBR group. One year after surgery, CI in the MFBR group was on average 4.7% higher than that in the FBR group (p < 0.001). During follow-up, CI decreased in both groups; however, at all time points CI was significantly higher in the MFBR group than in the FBR group. The impact of surgical technique on CI was less important than the impact of preoperative CI (R(2)= 0.26 vs 0.54), and this applied at all time points during follow-up. Head circumference declined during follow-up in both groups. It was influenced by preoperative head circumference, but not by surgical technique. Aesthetic outcome, prevalence of headache (42%), and papilledema (7%) were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Adding a widening bridge to late complete remodeling significantly improved CI and helped to prevent CI from decreasing in the long term. This addition did not affect the head circumference growth curve. Despite a mean head circumference remaining at +1 SD, patients continued to develop papilledema postoperatively (7%).

The incidence of raised intracranial pressure in nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis following primary surgery

OBJECT Raised intracranial pressure (ICP) is recognized to occur in patients with nonsyndromic isolated sagittal craniosynostosis (SC) prior to surgery. However, the incidence of raised ICP following primary surgery is rarely reported and there appears to be a widely held assumption that corrective surgery for SC prevents the later development of intracranial hypertension. This study reports the incidence of postoperative raised ICP in a large cohort of patients with SC treated by 1 of 2 surgical procedures in a single craniofacial unit. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of all patients with SC who underwent either a modified strip craniectomy (MSC) or calvarial remodeling (CR) procedure under the care of the Oxford Craniofacial Unit between 1995 and 2010 and who were followed up for more than 2 years. The influence of patient age at surgery, year of surgery, sex, procedure type, and the presence of raised ICP preoperatively were analyzed. RESULTS Two hundred seventeen children had primary surgery for SC and were followed up for a mean of 86 months. The overall rate of raised ICP following surgery was 6.9%, occurring at a mean of 51 months after the primary surgical procedure. Raised ICP was significantly more common in those patients treated by MSC (13 of 89 patients, 14.6%) than CR (2 of 128 patients, 1.6%). Also, raised ICP was more common in patients under 1 year of age, the majority of whom were treated by MCS. No other factor was found to have a significant effect. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative raised ICP was found in more than 1 in 20 children treated for nonsyndromic SC in this series. It was significantly influenced by the primary surgical procedure and age at primary surgery. Careful long-term follow-up is essential if children who develop raised ICP following surgery are not to be overlooked.

Surgical treatment of sagittal synostosis by extended strip craniectomy: cranial index, nasofrontal angle, reoperation rate, and a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Sagittal synostosis is the most common non-syndromic single suture craniosynostosis. Different techniques of surgical correction, including extended strip craniectomy (ESC), have been used to treat this condition. The aim of this study is to evaluate radiologic changes and rate of symptomatic restenosis after ESC in a large group of patients less than 12 months of age with non-syndromic sagittal synostosis.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients from 1990 to 2012 was performed comparing cranial index (CI) and nasofrontal angle (NFA) before and after surgical correction by ESC. Also, the frequency of subsequent reoperations for symptomatic restricted head growth was determined.

RESULTS

A total of 238 patients underwent ESC. Follow-up information was available for 182 patients. The average age at the time of the operation was 4.5 months and the mean duration of follow-up was 49.6 months. The average post procedure radiologic follow-up (22 patients) was 40.7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean CI increased from 0.68 to 0.75 (p < 0.001) after ESC. Also, mean NFA increased from 127 to 133° (p < 0.001). Five patients (2.7%) required a second operation due to symptomatic cranial growth restriction. Reoperation occurred at an average of 26.5 months after the initial procedure. The most common symptom reported was headache. ESC is effective in treating non-syndromic sagittal synostosis. It significantly improved NFA without the need for direct frontal bone resection or frontal orbital osteotomy and significantly increased CI without adjunctive helmet treatment. Patients should be followed for at least 5 years after surgical correction as symptomatic restenosis, although rare, can occur.

Results of early surgery for sagittal suture synostosis: long-term follow-up and the occurrence of raised intracranial pressure

PURPOSE

Numerous techniques are used to correct sagittal synostosis. Although cosmetic results and operative complications are well documented, little is known about functional outcome. In our institution, the technique for extended strip craniectomy evolved over time. This study compares cosmetic results, complications, and signs of raised intracranial pressure (ICP) between the variants of the extended strip craniectomy.

METHODS

Seventy-nine consecutive patients undergoing early extended strip craniectomy for scaphocephaly (2002-2008) were included. Four techniques were used: A, a simple bilateral parietal flap with out-fracturing of the bone flap; B, C, and D included remodeling of the parietal flap by adding triangular cuts and bending or suturing the resulting fingers. In technique D, the sagittal strip was rotated and fixed between the parietal flaps. Data on head circumference (HC), skull X-ray, and fundoscopy were collected prospectively.

RESULTS

For all patients, the average cranial index (CI) was 74 after 3 months and 72 after 2 years. Although technique D resulted in the best initial improvement, there was no significant percentage increase in CI after 24 months between the four techniques. Postoperatively, 9 % of the patients developed papilledema, 42 % developed a fontanel bulge, and 57 % had diminished HC. Four patients were reoperated on because of raised ICP.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative CI is mainly determined by preoperative CI and hardly affected by type of extended strip craniectomy. Signs of raised ICP occurred more frequently than expected, therefore structural follow-up is required to detect such signs. Technique and timing of surgery should aim at creating sufficient intracranial volume.

Spring-assisted correction of sagittal suture synostosis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to describe the technique and advantages and limitations of spring-assisted cranioplasty for sagittal suture synostosis.

METHODS

Preliminary data are presented of the first 41 patients treated with this technique at our institution.

RESULTS

The cephalic index was 75 after surgery and dropped to 74 one year after surgery. Mean blood loss of both procedures combined was 54 ml.

CONCLUSION

Spring-assisted cranioplasty requires only two small incisions and is at least as effective as other techniques with respect to the cephalic index. Blood loss, operative time, and complication rate are reduced. The most important disadvantage is the need to remove the springs in a second intervention. A second drawback is that the expansion of the spring is not controllable after placement. This can be partially intercepted by adjusting the spring (or the craniotomy) to the patient's specific features.