Auditory rehabilitation of patients with neurofibromatosis Type 2 by using cochlear implants

Longitudinal Performance of Cochlear Implants in Neurofibromatosis Type 2

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear implants (CIs) are a well-established treatment modality for hearing loss due to neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). Our aim is to investigate variables that affect longitudinal performance of CIs among patients with NF2.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review at a single academic institution consisting of patients who have received cochlear implants following hearing loss due to NF2.

METHODS

The primary outcome examined was CI disuse or explantation. Associated clinical and surgical variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics. These included postoperative pure tone average (PTA) at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz, tumor size, previous surgery, and comorbid depression.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients and 14 cochlear implants received at our institution from 2001 to 2022 were included. Notably, 35.7% of CIs (5 out of 14 cases) resulted in disuse or explantation. The average interval until explant was 9.4 years (range 3-14 years). In explanted CI cases, 20% had previous surgery and 80% had a diagnosis of comorbid depression as compared to 22.2% and 22.2%, respectively, in intact CI cases. Maximum tumor diameter was the only variable found to impact CI usage outcome (p = 0.028). Long-term data showed that on average, patients benefit from 13.85 years of CI utility and a maximum PTA improvement of 45.0 ± 29.0 dB.

CONCLUSION

Despite the recurrent nature of NF2, patients continue to receive audiological benefit from cochlear implants. We found that larger tumor size may be associated with longitudinal CI failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 134:1847-1853, 2024.

Cochlear Implantation after Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma: Initial Hearing Improvement and Longevity of Hearing Restoration

OBJECTIVE

The following research question was asked: In patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) that underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and cochlear implantation, were improvements in hearing function observed, and what was the cochlear implant (CI) failure rate of in these patients?

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/Medline, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Web of Science articles without restrictions on publication dates were searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria required that the article was a report, a series, or a retrospective review with individual case data available. Non-English articles were excluded. Inclusion criteria required that patients were with VS and underwent subsequent SRS and cochlear implantation. Patients receiving microsurgery or stereotactic radiotherapy on the ipsilateral ear were excluded from this study.

DATA EXTRACTION

Included studies were evaluated using full-text evaluation, and data on study characteristics (author names, gender), clinical data (syndromic information, SRS modality), hearing outcomes, and device failure were extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Means and averages were obtained for all continuous variables. Percentages were ascertained for all categorical variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients undergoing CI placement in VS treated with SRS achieved open-set speech perception (79.2%) or environmental sound awareness (6.8%). Twelve implants (20.3%) failed. Three patterns were associated with failure: 1) immediate-onset failure, 2) initial benefit with delayed failure, 3) poor local control with device explantation.

Efficacy of Cochlear Implantation in Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Related Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the results of cochlear implantation in subjects with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VS).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

University-based tertiary referral center.

SUBJECTS

Five subjects with NF2 and severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss.

INTERVENTION

Cochlear implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Surgical outcomes and audiometric performance after cochlear implantation.

RESULTS

Five subjects (3 female, 2 male) were included in the study. The mean age at the time of implantation was 54 years old (range 35-78 years). Follow-up after cochlear implantation averaged 38 months (range 21-106 months). In the 5 implanted ears, 2 had no prior treatment, 1 had undergone prior radiation therapy, 1 underwent prior microsurgical removal, and 1 underwent prior microsurgical removal with adjuvant radiation therapy. The mean ipsilateral VS dimensions at time of implantation were 14 mm × 7.2 mm × 6.1 mm (mediolateral × anteroposterior × craniocaudal). Following cochlear implant activation, all 5 subjects achieved sound awareness, open set speech recognition, and 4 continue to be daily users of the devices.

CONCLUSION

Cochlear implantation is a viable hearing rehabilitation option for subjects with NF2 and severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. All subjects reported benefit with their cochlear implant, including open set speech recognition, enhanced lip-reading skills and environmental awareness of sound. Four subjects continued to demonstrate improved open-set speech recognition at the time of their last evaluations.

Treated large posterior fossa vestibular schwannoma and meningioma: Hearing outcome and willingness-to-accept brain implant for unilateral deafness

Background/Objective

To compare functional hearing and tinnitus outcomes in treated large (~ 3 cm) vestibular schwannoma (VS) and posterior fossa meningioma cohorts, and construct willingness-to-accept profiles for an experimental brain implant to treat unilateral hearing loss.

Methods

A two-way MANOVA model with two independent variables (tumor type; time from treatment) and three dependent variables (hearing effort of tumor ear; abbreviated Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ12); Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI)) was used to analyze data from VS (N = 32) and meningioma (N = 50) patients who were treated at a tertiary care center between 2010 and 2020. A query to probe acceptance of experimental treatment for hearing loss relative to expected benefit was used to construct willingness-to-accept profiles.

Results

Tumor type was statistically significant on the combined dependent variables analysis (F[3, 76] = 19.172, p < .0005, Wilks' Λ = 0.569). Meningioma showed better outcome for hearing effort (F[1, 76] = 14.632, p < .0005) and SSQ12 (F[1, 76] = 16.164, p < .0005), but not for TFI (F[1, 76] = 1.247, p = .268) on univariate two-way ANOVA analyses. Superior hearing effort and SSQ12 indices in the short-term (< 2 years) persisted in the long-term (> 2 years) (p ≤ .017). At the 60% speech understanding level, 77% of respondents would accept an experimental brain implant.

Conclusion

Hearing outcome is better for posterior fossa meningioma compared to VS. Most patients with hearing loss in the tumor ear would consider a brain implant if the benefit level would be comparable to a cochlear implant.

Level of Evidence

2.

Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Patients With Retrocochlear Pathology: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review the current literature regarding cochlear implantation in patients with retrocochlear pathologies and extract speech perception scores between 6 months and 1 year after surgery.

DATABASES REVIEWED

PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL via Ovid, CINAHL Complete via Ebsco, and Web of Science.

METHODS

The review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Search strategies included keywords and subject headings to maximize retrieval and reflect cochlear implants and retrocochlear pathologies. Patients with previously resected vestibular schwannoma (VS) were excluded.

RESULTS

There were 2,524 abstracts screened against inclusion criteria, and 53 studies were included, with individual data available for 171 adult patients. Pathologies included were either observed or irradiated VS (previously operated tumors were excluded) (n = 99, 57.9%), superficial siderosis (n = 39, 22.8%), neurosarcoidosis (n = 11, 6.4%), and previous central nervous system or skull base radiation (n = 22, 12.9%). Mean (standard deviation) postoperative consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word scores were 45.4% (24.2) for observed VS, 44.4% (20.8) for irradiated VS, 43.6% (21.0) for superficial siderosis, 89.5% (3.0) for neurosarcoidosis, and 30.0% (30.2) in patients with previous central nervous system or skull base irradiation. Irradiated compared with observed VS had similar postoperative CNC word scores (effect size, 0.06; p = 0.71). Age, sex, maximal tumor dimension, and neurofibromatosis type 2 status did not significantly impact cochlear implant performance in patients with VS. Eighty-two percent of patients with reported device usage were daily users, and overall, 82% of cases benefitted from cochlear implantation.

CONCLUSION

Cochlear implantation in patients with concomitant retrocochlear pathology generally results in improved speech discrimination scores sustained over time.

Cochlear Implantation in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Experience From the UK Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Service

OBJECTIVE

To review the outcomes of cochlear implants (CI) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) in a large cohort, and identify factors associated with poor hearing benefit.

STUDY DESIGN

Fifteen-year retrospective national observational case series.

SETTING

United Kingdom regional NF2 multidisciplinary teams.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients with NF2 receiving a CI.

INTERVENTIONS

CI for hearing rehabilitation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

1) Audiometric performance at 9 to 12 months after implantation using City University of New York (CUNY) sentence recognition score, and Bamford- Kowal-Bench (BKB) word recognition score in quiet (BKBq), and in noise (BKBn). 2) CI use at most recent review.

RESULTS

Sixty four consecutive patients, median age 43 years, were included. Nine to 12 months mean audiometric scores were: CUNY 60.9%, BKBq 45.8%, BKBn 41.6%. There was no difference in audiometric outcomes between VS treatment modalities. At most recent review (median 3.6 years from implantation), 84.9% with device in situ/available data were full or part-time users. Between 9 and 12 months and most recent review there was an interval reduction in mean audiometric scores: CUNY -12.9%, BKBq -3.3%, BKBn -4.9%. Larger tumor size and shorter duration of profound hearing loss were the only variables associated with poorer audiometric scores. Tumor growth at the time of surgery was the only variable associated with CI non-use. Individual patient response was highly variable.

CONCLUSIONS

CI can provide significant and sustained auditory benefits to patients with NF2 independent of tumor treatment modality, with the majority of those implanted becoming at least part-time users. Larger datasets are required to reliably assess the role of independent variables.

Cochlear implant in vestibular schwannomas: long-term outcomes and critical analysis of indications

PURPOSE

To describe our institutional experience in cochlear implantation after vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection, and compare the audiological outcomes between sporadic and neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) VS sub-cohorts of patients, and in relation to preoperative contralateral hearing.

METHODS

Seventeen patients (8 sporadic and 9 NF2-associated VSs) who had undergone VS resection and cochlear implant (CI) were analyzed retrospectively. Audiological outcomes at 24 months were correlated with preoperative clinical variables. The results according to VS type (sporadic vs. NF2-associated) and contralateral hearing (impaired vs. normal) were compared.

RESULTS

Fourteen CIs were actively used by the patients (77.8%). Twenty-four months after CI activation, the median postoperative PTA (pure tone average) was 45.6 dB nHL and a measurable WRS (Word Recognition Score) was achieved by 44.4% of patients (median WRS = 40%). The median postoperative PTA in the implanted ear resulted better in the group with an impaired contralateral hearing (36.3 dB nHL vs. 78.8 dB nHL, p = 0.019). Good preoperative contralateral hearing status (A-B classes of AAO-HNS) was a negative prognostic factor for CI performance on open-set discrimination (OR = 28.0, 95% CI 2.07-379.25, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

CI is a viable rehabilitative option for patients with sporadic or NF2-associated VS. A good contralateral hearing adversely affects CI outcome and should be taken into consideration for patients' selection and rehabilitation programs.

Establishment of nomograms for the prediction of useful hearing loss in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2

INTRODUCTION

Treatment for vestibular schwannoma (VS) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is extremely challenging due to the high risk of hearing loss. The aim of this study was to develop nomograms for the prediction of useful hearing loss in patients with NF2.

METHODS

The nomogram was based on a retrospective study of 111 NF2 patients who underwent resection of large VS (> 2 cm) at Beijing Tiantan Hospital between 2011 and 2018. The utility of the proposed nomogram models was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under ROC curve (AUC), and calibration curve. The results were validated using a prospective cohort study on 33 patients consecutively enrolled at the same institution from 2019 to 2021.

RESULTS

On multivariate analysis of the primary cohort, large tumour size (> 3 cm) and long duration of symptoms (> 24 months) were independent risk factors for preoperative useful hearing loss (AAO-HNS Class D) (P = 0.001 and P = 0.011, respectively), while large tumour size (> 3 cm), poor hearing (Class C), and lobular growth were significantly related to postoperative useful hearing loss (P < 0.001, P = 0.031 and P = 0.033, respectively). Factors derived from multivariable analysis were all assembled into the nomogram. The calibration curve for probability of hearing loss showed good agreement between predictions by nomogram models and actual observation. The ROC curves showed good predictive accuracy of the nomogram models in both cohorts (AUC: 0.708 to 0.951).

CONCLUSION

The proposed nomograms resulted in accurate predictions of hearing outcomes for patients with NF2.

Cochlear Implantation in Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Literature Review

Objective  Ipsilateral cochlear implantation (CI) in vestibular schwannoma (VS) has been an emerging trend over the last two decades. We conducted the first systematic review of hearing outcomes comparing neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) and sporadic VS undergoing CI. A comparison of the two populations and predictor of outcome was assessed. This is an update to a previously presented study. Data Sources  Systemic data searches were performed in PubMed NCBI and Scopus by an academic librarian. No restrictions based on the year of publication were used. Study Selection  Studies were selected if patients had a diagnosis of NF2 and a CI placed in the affected side with reports of hearing outcome. Two independent reviewers screened each abstract and full-text article. Data Extraction  Studies were extracted at the patient level, and the assessment of quality and bias was evaluated according to the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool. Main Outcome Measures  Outcome predictors were determined by using the chi-square test and Student's t -test. Results  Overall, most CI recipients functioned in the high-to-intermediate performer category for both sporadic and NF2-related VS. Median AzBio (Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test) was 72% (interquartile range [IQR]: 50) in NF2 patients and 70% (IQR: 7.25) in sporadic patients. Larger tumor size predicted a poorer final audiometric outcome. Conclusions  Categorization of hearing outcome into superior performance and inferior performance based on sentence recognition revealed a generally good hearing outcome regardless of treatment or patient population. Select patients with sporadic and NF2 VS may benefit from CI.

Simultaneous Cochlear Implantation After Translabyrinthine Vestibular Schwannoma Resection: A Report of 41 Cases

OBJECTIVE

To study the auditory outcome of simultaneous translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection and cochlear implantation (CI) after successful cochlear nerve preservation.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case series and patient questionnaire.

SETTING

Quaternary referral center for skull base pathologies.

PATIENTS

Patients with small (<2 cm) sporadic or neurofibromatosis 2 related tumors were included in this study.

INTERVENTION

Vestibular schwannoma resection + simultaneous cochlear implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Audiological performance postimplantation and perceived patients' benefits.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were included. Thirty-three were sporadic VS and eight were neurofibromatosis 2. Auditory perception postimplantation was achieved in 33 patients (80.5%). At the last follow-up, 20 patients (48.8%) were users and 21 (51.2%) were nonusers. In the users' group, and after 1 year of implant activation, vowel identification was 75.3%, disyllabic word recognition 54%, sentence recognition 60.7%, and common phrase comprehension 61%, whereas in the nonusers' group and after 1 year of implant activation, vowel identification was 22.9%, disyllabic word recognition 14.8%, sentence recognition 15.3%, and common phrase comprehension 14%. Sixteen users were classified into 10 high performers, three intermediate performers, and three poor performers. In the user' group, the mean postimplantation pure tone average was 63.4 dB and the mean speech discrimination score was 63.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous CI and VS resection is a viable option with many patients achieving auditory perception and nearly half the patients are CI users at long follow-up.

Current Understanding of Hearing Loss in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review

Objective

Hearing loss is the most common initial symptom in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannomas (SVS). Hearing preservation is an important goal of both conservative and surgical therapy. However, the mechanism of SVS-associated hearing loss remains unclear. Thus, we performed this systematic review to summarize the current understanding of hearing loss in the SVS and distill a testable hypothesis to further illuminate its underlying mechanism.

Methods

A systematic review querying four databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Web of Science) was performed to identify studies evaluating hearing loss in patients with SVS and exploring the potential mechanisms of hearing impairment.

Results

A total of 50 articles were eligible and included in this review. After analysis, the retrieved studies could be categorized into four types: (1) 29 studies explore the relationship between hearing loss and the growth pattern of the tumor (e.g., tumor size/volume, growth rate, tumor location, etc.); (2) ten studies investigate the potential role of cochlear dysfunction in hearing deterioration, including structural abnormality, protein elevation in perilymph, and cochlear malfunctioning; (3) two studies looked into SVS-induced impairment of auditory pathway and cortex; (4) in the rest nine studies, researchers explored the molecular mechanism underlying hearing loss in SVS, which involves molecular and genetic alterations, inflammatory response, growth factors, and other tumor-associated secretions.

Conclusions

Multiple factors may contribute to the hearing impairment in SVS, including the growth pattern of tumor, cochlear dysfunction, impairment of auditory pathway and cortex, genetic and molecular changes. However, our current understanding is still limited, and future studies are needed to explore this multifactorial hypothesis and dig deeper into its underlying mechanism.

Cochlear Implantation in NF2 Patients Without Intracochlear Schwannoma Removal

OBJECTIVE

To determine if cochlear implantation without removal of inner ear schwannomas (IES) is an effective treatment option for Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) patients. To determine how the presence of an intracochlear schwannoma might impact cochlear implant (CI) outcomes and programming parameters.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary center for cochlear and auditory brainstem implantation.

PATIENTS

Of 10 NF2 patients with IES, 8 are reported with no previous tumor removal on the implanted ear.

INTERVENTIONS

Cochlear implant without tumor removal.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Performance outcomes with CI at least 1-year post intervention. Programming parameters, including impedances, for patients with IES.

RESULTS

All patients had full insertion of the electrode arrays with round window approaches. Performance outcomes ranged from 0 to 100% for Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentences. Impedance measurements for active electrodes for patients with IES were comparable to those measured in patients without vestibular schwannoma (VS). Only patients who had radiation treatment before receiving their implant had elevated threshold requirements for CI programming compared with CI recipients without VS.

CONCLUSION

Cochlear implantation without tumor removal is an effective option for treating NF2 patients with IES. The presence of an intracochlear tumor did not have an impact on CI performance or programming requirements compared with patients without VS; however, previous treatment with radiation may be related to elevated current requirements in the CI settings.

Cochlear implantation after radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

The object of this study was to ascertain outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS).

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients with VS treated with SRS who underwent CI between 1990 and 2019 at a single tertiary care referral center. Patient demographics, tumor features, treatment parameters, and pre- and postimplantation audiometric and clinical outcomes are presented.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients (18 ears) underwent SRS and ipsilateral CI during the study period. Thirteen patients (76%) had neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). Median age at SRS and CI were 44 and 48 years, respectively. Median time from SRS to CI was 60 days, but notably, 4 patients underwent SRS and CI within 1 day and 5 patients underwent CI more than 7 years after SRS. Median marginal dose was 13 Gy. Median treatment volume at the time of SRS was 1400 mm3 (range 84-6080 mm3, n = 15 patients). Median post-CI PTA was 28 dB HL, improved from 101 dB HL preoperatively (p < 0.001). Overall, 11 patients (12 ears) exhibited open-set speech understanding. Sentence testing was performed at a median of 10 months (range 1-143 months) post-CI. The median AzBio sentence score for patients with open-set speech understanding was 76% (range 19%-95%, n = 10 ears). Two ears exhibited Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) sentence scores of 49% and 95%, respectively. Four patients achieved environmental sound awareness without open-set speech recognition. Two had no detectable auditory percepts.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients who underwent CI following SRS for VS enjoyed access to sound at near-normal levels, with the majority achieving good open-set speech understanding. Implantation can be performed immediately following SRS or in a delayed fashion, depending on hearing status as well as other factors. This strategy may be applied to cases of sporadic or NF2-associated VS.

ABBREVIATIONS

AAO-HNS = American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; ABI = auditory brainstem implant; CI = cochlear implantation; CN = cranial nerve; CNC = consonant-nucleus-consonant; CPA = cerebellopontine angle; EPS = electrical promontory stimulation; ESA = environmental sound awareness; HINT = Hearing in Noise Test; IAC = internal auditory canal; NF2 = neurofibromatosis type 2; OSP = open-set speech perception; PTA = pure tone average; SRS = stereotactic radiosurgery; VS = vestibular schwannoma; WRS = word recognition score.

Hearing preservation/rehabilitation surgery for small vestibular schwannoma: preliminary experience with the presigmoid retrolabyrinthine approach

BACKGROUND

The presigmoid retrolabyrinthine approach (PRA) for small vestibular schwannoma (VS) has unique advantages. Combination with partial labyrinthectomy further makes up its defect of high demand for anatomy.

OBJECTIVE

Aimed to describe our use of the PRA with partial labyrinthectomy in VS surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 10 patients diagnosed with VS who underwent PRA between September 2017 and November 2020. Their perioperative data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Six tumors were on the left and three were on the right. One case was due to neurofibromatosis type 2 with bilateral involvement and underwent internal auditory canal decompression by PRA without tumor removal; all other patients underwent total tumor resection. Four patients underwent cochlear implantation simultaneously because of hearing loss that was detected during surgery. Three patients underwent partial labyrinthectomy. Five patients achieved hearing preservation, and one experienced hearing improvement. One of the three patients who underwent partial labyrinthectomy maintained hearing. All patients' pre- and postoperative facial nerve functions were House-Brackmann grade I. After a median follow-up time of 13 months, no tumors recurred.

CONCLUSIONS

PRA for small VS is a safe and effective surgery that can achieve facial nerve and hearing preservation. Combination with partial labyrinthectomy can also preserve hearing.

Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Implications for Management

OBJECTIVE

To describe our institutional experience with cochlear implantation (CI) for rehabilitation of hearing loss in Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review between 1989 and 2019.

SETTING

Tertiary-care center.

PATIENTS

Twenty-four patients (67% female, mean age 45.6years) with NF2. Management of their ipsilateral vestibular schwannoma included microsurgery (n=12), stereotactic radiation (n=5), and observation (n=7).

INTERVENTIONS

Cochlear implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Ability to obtain open-set speech, daily device usage and long-term device benefit.

RESULTS

All patients achieved some degree of sound awareness with CI. Nineteen patients (79%) achieved open-set speech understanding with a mean word-recognition score of 43% (range 0-88%). Patients with tumors 1.5 cm or less demonstrated the better speech understanding, without significant differences among treatment modalities. For tumors greater than 1.5 cm, patients who underwent microsurgery had a lower rate of open-set speech understanding compared to those treated with radiation or observation. Regular daily device use in 83% of patients was found. Long-term use (>10years) was observed in several patients, though some ultimately required reimplantation with an auditory brainstem implant due to progressive tumor growth. Mean follow-up duration was 4.1 years (range 0.4-15).

CONCLUSIONS

Cochlear implantation can be an effective treatment for hearing loss in NF2 patients provided the cochlear nerve is intact, regardless of prior management for the ipsilateral tumor. The degree of benefit varies and is influenced by tumor size. Management strategies that preserve the cochlear nerve maximize the interval during which a CI could be of benefit to NF2 patients.

MRI surveillance following concurrent cochlear implantation in cases of vestibular schwannoma resection

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear nerve preserving translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection enables concurrent cochlear implantation. Implantation in patients with VS raises important concerns including the ability to undergo postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) monitoring of residual tumor growth or tumor recurrence, specifically with a retained magnet. We aim to assess the feasibility of MRI monitoring and the impact on image quality with retained cochlear implant (CI) magnets.

METHODS

Retrospective review of post-operative head MRI scans in CI recipients with a retained CI magnet, after cochlear nerve preserving translabyrinthine excision of VS. The ability to visualize the ipsilateral and contralateral internal auditory canal (IAC) and cerebellopontine angle (CPA) were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of eight surveillance head MRI were performed in six patients. In one case, in which the receiver was positioned lower, the view of the ipsilateral IAC and CPA was distorted. In all other cases, the views of both the ipsilateral and contralateral IAC and CPA were overall unimpaired.

DISCUSSION

Imaging artifact only very rarely impedes adequate visualization of the ipsilateral IAC or CPA in CI recipients. In anticipation of the need for further IAC and CPA imaging, it would be advisable to place the receiver in an exaggerated superior-posterior position to further decrease obscuring artifact. Thus, serial monitoring of VS tumors can be performed safely with preservation of image quality with a retained receiver magnet.

CONCLUSIONS

When placing the CI receiver-stimulator farther posterior-superiorly, excellent visualization of the IAC and CPA can be accomplished without significantly impairing the image quality.

Ipsilateral Cochlear Implantation in the Presence of Observed and Irradiated Vestibular Schwannomas

OBJECTIVES

Historically, eventual loss of cochlear nerve function has limited patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) to auditory brainstem implants (ABI), which in general are less effective than modern cochlear implants (CI). Our objective is to evaluate hearing outcomes following ipsilateral cochlear implantation in patients with NF2 and irradiated vestibular schwannomas (VS), and sporadic VS that have been irradiated or observed.

METHODS

Multi-center retrospective analysis of ipsilateral cochlear implantation in the presence of observed and irradiated VS. MESH search in NCBI PubMed database between 1992 and 2019 for reported cases of cochlear implantation with unresected vestibular schwannoma.

RESULTS

Seven patients underwent ipsilateral cochlear implantation in the presence of observed or irradiated vestibular schwannomas. Four patients had sporadic tumors with severe-profound contralateral hearing loss caused by presbycusis/hereditary sensorineural hearing loss, and three patients with NF2 lost contralateral hearing after prior surgical resection. Prior to implantation, one VS was observed without growth for a period of 7 years and the others were treated with radiotherapy. Mean post-operative sentence score was 63.9% (range 48-91) at an average of 28 (range 2-84) months follow up. All patients in this cohort obtained open set speech perception. While analysis of the literature is limited by heterogenous data reporting, 85% of implants with observed schwannomas achieved some open set perception, and 67% of patients previously radiated schwannomas. Furthermore, blending literature outcomes for post implantation sentence testing in quiet without lip-reading show 59.0 ± 35% for patients with CI and observed tumors and 55.7 ± 35% for patients with radiated tumors, with both groups ranging 0 to 100%.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective series and literature review highlight that hearing outcomes with CI for VS patients are superior to those achieved with ABI. However, important considerations including imaging, delayed hearing loss, and observation time cannot be ignored in this population.

The emerging role of hearing loss rehabilitation in patients with vestibular schwannoma treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: literature review

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is currently the most common treatment for small- to medium-size vestibular schwannoma (VS). Despite favorable outcome, hearing deterioration still remains an underestimated problem, and the role of hearing rehabilitation is an underinvestigated topic. Among available technologies, cochlear implant (CI) should represent a valid alternative in sporadic VS with single-sided deafness and in neurofibromatosis (NF2) with bilateral profound hearing loss. A literature review of the current clinical data was performed searching scientific literature databases. From all of the articles found, 16 papers were selected. Forty-four subjects treated with radiosurgery (18 male, 19 female, and in 7 cases, sex were not specified; 43 NF2 and 1 sporadic VS) were included in the analysis. Epidemiological, clinical, tumor, treatment, and audiological data were collected. Clinical outcome at last follow-up showed an audiological improvement in 25 of the 44 patients. The audiological outcome was unchanged in 16 cases. Audiological deterioration was recorded in 3 cases. Severity of NF2 phenotype, long history of ipsilateral profound deafness before implantation, progressive tumor growth, and high radiation dose (20 and 40 Gy) were found in patients with a worst audiological outcome. Hearing rehabilitation can improve audiological results for VS patients following SRS in selected cases. Hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implant (CI) in SSD leads to partial restoration of binaural hearing with an improvement in speech comprehension in noise and in sound localization, and partial suppression of subjective incapacitating tinnitus. SRS followed by CI may represent in selected cases a potential emerging option in the management of these patients, aimed at improving their quality of life. Possible implications for the follow-up of these patients are still present, although partially resolved.

Management of sporadic vestibular schwannoma with contralateral nonserviceable hearing

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To outline a possible decision-making process for sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) with contralateral nonserviceable hearing at diagnosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Diagnosed VS was studied in a tertiary referral center from 1995 to 2013.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 6.9 years (range = 0.5-20 years). Ten were stage 1, 10 were stage 2, five were stage 3, and three were stage 4. Ipsilateral hearing levels were A (n = 3), B (n = 10), C (n = 7) and D (n = 8) American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery classification. Contralateral hearing levels were C (n = 11) and D (n = 17). Initial VS management included surveillance (n = 12) or surgery (n = 16), and four patients were later treated with surgery (n = 3) or stereotactic irradiation (n = 1). Hearing was improved by hearing aids and/or etiological treatment (n = 8), restored by contralateral (n = 15) or ipsilateral (n = 4) cochlear implants (CIs), or ipsilateral auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) (n = 3). Finally, 18 CIs were active daily; 14 of them presented high or moderate benefit with mean open-set dissyllabic word scores (WRS) of 58.1% and sentence recognition scores (SRS) of 69.7%, but only one ABI was still active (WRS of 70% and SRS of 87% with lip reading).

CONCLUSIONS

When early removal of VS was not necessary, contralateral CI or etiological treatment for hearing loss might be recommended initially. Ipsilateral CI is proposed, whereas VS should be operated on if previous hearing restoration was not successful. ABI should be reserved for the rare cases where a contralateral CI could not be implanted or the cochlear nerve was sectioned during VS removal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 130:E407-E415, 2020.

Hearing rehabilitation outcomes in cochlear implant recipients with vestibular schwannoma in observation or radiotherapy groups: A systematic review

Objectives: Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are rare benign tumours of the vestibular nerve that cause hearing loss. Management strategies include watchful waiting, radiotherapy or surgical resection. Historically, the presence of retrocochlear disease has been considered to be a contra-indication to cochlear implantation (CI). The aim of this systematic review is to assess hearing rehabilitation outcomes for CI recipients with VS, either sporadic or associated with neurofibromatosis type 2, whose tumours have been managed with either observation or radiotherapy.Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception through to November 2018. 50 cases from 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Patient demographics, VS characteristics, management strategy, pre-CI hearing status, electrical promontory stimulation testing, post-CI hearing status and speech perception scores, functional benefits and follow-up length are reported.Results: Radiotherapy and observation groups had similar patient demographics in terms of age at CI, tumour size and duration of deafness. Following CI, 64% and 60% of patients in the radiotherapy and observation groups achieved open-set speech perception, respectively. Pure tone average thresholds (33 vs. 39 dB) and speech scores were also comparable between both groups.Conclusion: Ipsilateral CI in patients with VS that have not been surgically resected can provide beneficial hearing rehabilitation outcomes.

Cochlear patency following translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma resection: implications for hearing rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE

To examine when cochlear fibrosis occurs following a translabyrinthine approach for vestibular schwannoma resection, and to determine the safest time window for potential cochlear implantation in cases with a preserved cochlear nerve.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed the post-operative magnetic resonance imaging scans of patients undergoing a translabyrinthine approach for vestibular schwannoma resection, assessing the fluid signal within the cochlea. Cochleae were graded based on the Isaacson et al. system (from grade 0 - no obstruction, to grade 4 - complete obliteration).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The cochleae showed no evidence of obliteration in: 75 per cent of patients at six months, 38.5 per cent at one year and 27 per cent beyond one year. Most changes happened between 6 and 12 months after vestibular schwannoma resection, with cases of an unobstructed cochlear decreasing dramatically, from 75 per cent to 38.5 per cent, within this time.

CONCLUSION

The progress of cochlear obliteration that occurred between 6 and 12 months following vestibular schwannoma resection indicates that the first 6 months provides a safer time window for cochlear patency.

Auditory Brainstem Implantation: An Overview

An auditory brainstem implant (ABI) is a surgically implanted central neural auditory prosthesis for the treatment of profound sensorineural hearing loss in children and adults who are not cochlear implant candidates due to a lack of anatomically intact cochlear nerves or implantable cochleae. The device consists of a multielectrode surface array which is placed within the lateral recess of the fourth ventricle along the brainstem and directly stimulates the cochlear nucleus, thereby bypassing the peripheral auditory system. In the United States, candidacy criteria for ABI include deaf patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) who are 12 years or older undergoing first- or second-side vestibular schwannoma resection. In recent years, several non-NF2 indications for ABI have been explored, including bilateral cochlear nerve avulsion from trauma, complete ossification of the cochlea due to meningitis, or a severe cochlear malformation not amenable to cochlear implantation. In addition, growing experience with ABI in infants and children has been documented with encouraging outcomes. While cochlear implantation generally remains the first-line option for hearing rehabilitation in NF2 patients with stable tumors or post hearing preservation surgery where hearing is lost but a cochlear nerve remains accessible for stimulation, an ABI is the next alternative in cases where the cochlear nerve is absent and/or if the cochlea cannot be implanted. Herein, we review ABI device design, clinical evaluation, indications, operative technique, and outcomes as it relates to lateral skull base pathology.

Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness: A New Treatment Paradigm

Unilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), also known as single sided deafness (SSD), is a problem that affects both children and adults, and can have severe and detrimental effects on multiple aspects of life including music appreciation, speech understanding in noise, speech and language acquisition, performance in the classroom and/or the workplace, and quality of life. Additionally, the loss of binaural hearing in SSD patients affects those processes that rely on two functional ears including sound localization, binaural squelch and summation, and the head shadow effect. Over the last decade, there has been increasing interest in cochlear implantation for SSD to restore binaural hearing. Early data are promising that cochlear implantation for SSD can help to restore binaural functionality, improve quality of life, and may faciliate reversal of neuroplasticity related to auditory deprivation in the pediatric population. Additionally, this new patient population has allowed researchers the opportunity to investigate the age-old question "what does a cochlear implant (CI) sound like?."

Cochlear Implantation in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Literature Review

Objective  This study was aimed to perform a systematic literature review by examining outcomes in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) undergoing ipsilateral cochlear implant (CI). Data Sources  PubMed-NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) and Scopus databases were searched through October 2017. Study Selection  Studies reporting auditory outcomes for each patient when a CI was placed with an ipsilateral sporadic VS were included. Main Outcome Measures  Demographic variables, VS characteristics, preoperative hearing metrics, duration of deafness, CI type, approach to tumor resection, postoperative auditory outcomes, and postoperative tinnitus outcomes were reported for each eligible patient within studies. Each study was evaluated for quality and bias. Results  Fifteen studies and 45 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean speech discrimination score (SDS) improved from 30.0 to 56.4% after CI placement. The majority when reported had an improvement in tinnitus. Preoperative ipsilateral SDS was a negative predictor of postoperative SDS, while neither tumor resection status, tumor location, duration of deafness, ipsilateral pure tone average, nor timing of CI placement had a significant effect on patient outcome. Conclusions  Notwithstanding the challenges inherent with surveillance magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the setting of a cochlear implant magnet, select sporadic vestibular schwannoma patients can be considered for cochlear implantation.

Impact of cochlear implantation on the management strategy of patients with neurofibromatosis type 2

PURPOSE

To investigate the outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), and to discuss the current management strategy for NF2 patients.

METHODS

The medical records of NF2 patients who received cochlear implants (CI) at our center between 2012 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Pre-operative hearing status, tumor status, treatment of tumors, and auditory outcomes post-implantation were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included in the study. Five were implanted with the tumor in situ; two of them received radiotherapy pre-implantation, and three were implanted without any previous treatment. Four patients were implanted simultaneously with tumor removal. Three patients were implanted as second-stage after failed hearing preservation surgery. The mean pure tone audiometry with the implant was 44 dB (range 25-80 dB) and the mean sentence recognition score (SRS) in a quiet environment without lip reading was 63% (range 0-97%). A poorer objective auditory outcome was identified in one patient who showed no response to electrical promontory stimulation (EPS), but the sound perception was still helpful. In total, 11 of 12 (91%) patients were daily users, and the other patient used the implant as a "sleeper" device due to its interference with contralateral hearing provided by a hearing aid.

CONCLUSION

CI is an effective option in auditory rehabilitation and should be considered primarily for NF2 patients with intact cochlear nerve. EPS might be a predictor for cochlear implant performance. Good contralateral hearing may present a barrier to daily use.

Prospective Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Translabyrinthine Excision of Vestibular Schwannoma with Concurrent Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVE

Translabyrinthine (TL) vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection may be accomplished with preservation of the cochlear nerve, permitting successful, concurrent cochlear implantation. In this single institution, Food and Drug Administration-approved feasibility study, we wished to determine the success and outcomes of concurrent cochlear implantation at the time of TL resection of VS.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients with small VS less than 1.5 cm in size.

INTERVENTION

Concurrent TL VS resection and cochlear implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Sound localization and speech understanding.

RESULTS

All cochlear nerves were anatomically preserved. Five out of seven patients had auditory precepts at the time of activation. At 1 month following surgery, AzBio scores (0 dB SNR, with sound front, noise to normal ear) were improved by an average of 10% with implant on, persisting to 6 months out from surgery. Localization 1 month after surgery was markedly improved with root mean square 78 degrees ±13 in the "implant off" condition and 41 ± 9 degrees in the "implant on" condition. Average tinnitus severity was reduced in subjects and speech and spatial hearing was improved on speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate preservation of electrical hearing in TL VS surgery is consistently possible, and although speech outcomes do not achieve the same levels seen with other etiologies of hearing loss, excellent improvement in sound localization, improved speech understanding, and substantial reductions in tinnitus are achieved.

Cochlear implantation and auditory brainstem implantation in neurofibromatosis type 2

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To report a series of patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), where each patient underwent both cochlear implantation and auditory brainstem implantation for hearing rehabilitation, and to discuss factors influencing respective implant success.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Ten NF2 patients with both cochlear implantations and auditory brainstem implantations were retrospectively reviewed. Speech testing for auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) and cochlear implants (CIs) was performed separately. Scores at last follow-up were obtained for Iowa vowels and consonants, Northwestern University Children's Perception of Speech (NU-CHIPS), and City University of New York (CUNY) sentences.

RESULTS

Mean age at time of implant was 37 years for cochlear implantation and 40 years for auditory brainstem implantation (P = .790, t test). Nine of 10 patients had a CI and ABI on contralateral sides, and one had both devices on the same side. Mean duration of deafness in the implanted ear was 4.3 years for both cochlear implantation and auditory brainstem implantation (P = .491, t test). Follow-up range was 1 to 28 years. CI performance on NU-CHIPS was 32% to 100%, and sound + lip-reading CUNY was 56% to 100%. Four patients experienced an eventual decline in CI function to unusable levels. ABI performance on NU-CHIPS was 40% to 80%, and sound + lip-reading CUNY was 38% to 94%. There was no notable decline in ABI function over time.

CONCLUSIONS

If the cochlear nerve is intact, cochlear implantation can be an effective strategy for hearing rehabilitation in NF2. However, a significant proportion experience a decline in CI performance related to growing vestibular schwannoma or tumor treatment. Auditory brainstem implantation remains the standard option for surgical hearing rehabilitation in NF2, but peak performance is generally lower than that achievable with cochlear implantation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 128:2163-2169, 2018.

Long-term outcome after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for acoustic neuroma of all Koos grades: a single-center study

OBJECTIVE

The authors present long-term follow-up data on patients treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for acoustic neuroma.

METHODS

Six hundred eighteen patients were radiosurgically treated for acoustic neuroma between 1992 and 2016 at the Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna. Patients with neurofibromatosis and patients treated too recently to attain 1 year of follow-up were excluded from this retrospective study. Thus, data on 557 patients with spontaneous acoustic neuroma of any Koos grade are presented, as are long-term follow-up data on 426 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were assessed according to the Gardner-Robertson (GR) hearing scale and the House-Brackmann facial nerve function scale, both prior to GKRS and at the times of follow-up.

RESULTS

Four hundred fifty-two patients (81%) were treated with radiosurgery alone and 105 patients (19%) with combined microsurgery-radiosurgery. While the combined treatment was especially favored before 2002, the percentage of cases treated with radiosurgery alone has significantly increased since then. The overall complication rate after GKRS was low and has declined significantly in the last decade. The risk of developing hydrocephalus after GKRS increased with tumor size. One case (0.2%) of malignant transformation after GKRS was diagnosed. Radiological tumor control rates of 92%, 91%, and 91% at 5, 10, and 15 years after GKRS, regardless of the Koos grade or pretreatment, were observed. The overall tumor control rate without the need for additional treatment was even higher at 98%. At the last follow-up, functional hearing was preserved in 55% of patients who had been classified with GR hearing class I or II prior to GKRS. Hearing preservation rates of 53%, 34%, and 34% at 5, 10, and 15 years after GKRS were observed. The multivariate regression model revealed that the GR hearing class prior to GKRS and the median dose to the cochlea were independent predictors of the GR class at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In small to medium-sized spontaneous acoustic neuromas, radiosurgery should be recognized as the primary treatment at an early stage. Although minimizing the cochlear dose seems beneficial for hearing preservation, the authors, like others before, do not recommend undertreating intracanalicular tumors in favor of low cochlear doses. For larger acoustic neuromas, radiosurgery remains a reliable management option with tumor control rates similar to those for smaller acoustic neuromas; however, careful patient selection and counseling are recommended given the higher risk of side effects. Microsurgery must be considered in acoustic neuromas with significant brainstem compression or hydrocephalus.

Outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2

In neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VS) or their treatment usually results in bilateral hearing loss. Cochlear implantation (CI) was traditionally not used in these patients due to concern that retrocochlear disease would render the implant ineffective. This paper describes the auditory outcomes of CI in 13 patients with NF2 and includes patients with untreated VS and patients undergoing VS removal with cochlear nerve preservation. The non-user rate was 7.7%. Of the active users, median CUNY score was 98%, median BKB score in quiet was 90% and median BKB score in noise was 68%. CI is a viable option in selected patients with NF2.

Hearing optimisation in neurofibromatosis type 2: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

It is common for patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 to develop bilateral profound hearing loss hearing loss, and this is one of the main determinants of quality of life in this patient group.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to review the current literature regarding hearing outcomes of treatments for vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type 2 including conservative and medical management, radiotherapy, hearing preservation surgery and auditory implantation in order to determine the most effective way of preserving or rehabilitating hearing.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A MESH search in PubMed using search terms (('Neurofibromatosis 2' [Mesh]) AND 'Neuroma, Acoustic'[Mesh]) AND 'Hearing Loss' [Mesh] was performed. A search using keywords was also performed. Studies with adequate hearing outcome data were included. With the exception of the cochlear implant studies (cohort size was very small), case studies were excluded.

EVALUATION METHOD

The GRADE system was used to assess quality of publication. Formal statistical analysis of data was not performed because of very heterogenous data reporting.

RESULTS

Conservative management offers the best chance of hearing preservation in stable tumours. The use of bevacizumab probably improves the likelihood of hearing preservation in growing tumours in the short term and is probably more effective than hearing preservation surgery and radiotherapy in preserving hearing. Of the hearing preservation interventions, hearing preservation surgery probably offers better hearing preservation rates than radiotherapy for small tumours but recurrence rates for hearing preservation surgery were high. For patients with profound hearing loss, cochlear implantation provides significantly better auditory outcomes than auditory brainstem implantation. Patients with untreated stable tumours are likely to achieve the best outcomes from cochlear implantation. Those who have had their tumours treated with surgery or radiotherapy do not gain as much benefit from cochlear implantation than those with untreated tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

This review summarises the current literature related to hearing preservation/rehabilitation in patients with NF2. Whilst it provides indicative data, the quality of the data was low and should be interpreted with care. It is also important to consider that the management of vestibular schwannomas in NF2 is complex and decision-making is determined by many factors, not just the need to preserve hearing.

Cochlear implants in the management of hearing loss in Neurofibromatosis Type 2

OBJECTIVE

Review of cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2), implanted in the presence of an ipsilateral vestibular schwannoma (VS). Hearing restoration was combined in some cases with a Bevacizumab regime.

METHOD

Retrospective review of 12 patients, managed over the period 2009-2016, at a tertiary referral multidisciplinary NF2 clinic. The patients are grouped by hearing outcomes to explore likely protective factors, and to generate a proposed decision-making tool for the selection of either CI or Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI).

RESULTS

Four of the 12 patients achieved speech discrimination without lip-reading. In these individuals there is reason to think that the mechanism of their hearing loss was cochlear dysfunction. A further four patients received benefit to lip-reading and awareness of environmental sound. For such patients their hearing loss may have been due to both cochlear and neural dysfunction. Two patients gained access to environmental sound only from their CI. Two patients derived no benefit from their CIs, which were subsequently explanted. Both these latter patients had had prior ipsilateral tumour surgery, one just before the CI insertion.

CONCLUSION

Cochlear implantation can lead to open set speech discrimination in patients with NF2 in the presence of a stable VS. Use of promontory stimulation and intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem response testing, along with case history, can inform the decision whether to implant an ABI or CI.

Stereotactic radiosurgery does not appear to impact cochlear implant performance in patients with neurofibromatosis type II

INTRODUCTION

Neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2) is a genetic condition associated with the presence of bilateral vestibular schwannoma and progressive sensorineural hearing loss. Treatment options include observation, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or surgical resection. Historically, retrocochlear pathology was a contraindication to cochlear implantation (CI). However it is now recognized as viable, in an attempt to restore hearing and improve communication.Thus, the aim of this study was to contrast auditory function in CI recipients with NF2 whose tumors were either observed versus initially treated with SRS.

METHODS

A local review of hearing outcomes in 2 CI patients (3 ears total) with NF2 was undertaken and then pooled with the existing medical literature. Comparative post-implant outcome data, including pure-tone average and aided speech perception measurements was analyzed and compared between 8 subjects whose tumors were observed and 11 subjects who received pre-implantation SRS.

RESULTS

Mean tumor size in the observation cohort was 0.81cm (.13cm to 1.50cm), and 2.34cm in the SRS group (0.10cm to 3.7cm). The mean reported duration of deafness was 22 months as compared to 71 months in the SRS cohort. Both groups demonstrated similar pre-implant candidacy criteria, average age and open-set speech recognition. Although disparate outcome measurements were utilized across studies, an analysis of post-implant open-set speech perception found no significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite a small sample size and highly variable post implantation testing methods, patients who undergo SRS for NF2 associated Schwannoma prior to CI have similar hearing performance and benefit by having already completed definitive tumor management.

Pediatric neurofibromatosis type 2: clinical and molecular presentation, management of vestibular schwannomas, and hearing rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe the clinical and molecular presentation of pediatric neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and the subsequent management of vestibular schwannomas (VS) and hearing rehabilitation.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective study of neurofibromatosis type 2 diagnosed before the age of 18 years old from 1997. Natural history of vestibular schwannomas and surgical outcomes were evaluated using volumetric MRI, hearing, and facial nerve assessment. Patients included in chemotherapy protocols were excluded.

RESULTS

From a database of 80 patients followed up for NF2 on a regular basis, 25 patients were eligible (11 sporadic cases, 14 inherited in five families). The mean age at diagnosis was 11.6 years old. The average clinical follow-up was 6.5 years. NF2 mutation was identified in 81 % of the probands. The average growth rate based on the maximum linear diameter (DGR) was 1.68 mm/year (n = 33, average follow-up 4.22 years) and 545 mm³/year in volumetric assessment (VGR) for VS larger than 1 cm (n = 21, average follow-up 3.4 years). In unoperated ears, hearing was stable in about 50 % of ears. The mean change in dB HL was 9.5 dB/year for pure-tone average and 3.5 for speech-recognition threshold (n = 34, 5.5 years 1-12). Eight children required removal through a translabyrinthine approach (mean follow-up was 4.5 years), six patients were operated on for hearing preservation (mean postoperative follow-up 4.3 years). Six patients were eligible for hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implantation (I), and five received placement of an auditory brainstem implant.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis and treatment of small growing VS should be carefully discussed considering familial history and possible rehabilitation with a CI.

Strategy for the surgical treatment of vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2

OBJECTIVE

Guidelines for appropriate management of vestibular schwannomas in NF2 patients are controversial. In this paper we reviewed our experience with patients with NF2 for the results of surgical treatment with particular reference to hearing and facial nerve preservation.

METHODS

We included in the study 30 patients (16 women and 14 men) with the diagnosis of NF2 treated in our department between 1998 and 2014 who underwent surgery for vestibular schwannoma removal with a follow-up for at least 1 year. In 3 cases, the vestibular schwannomas were unilateral. Six patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas underwent unilateral procedure. Therefore, 51 acoustic tumors were studied in 30 patients.

RESULTS

No operative death we noted. Significant deterioration to the non-functional level occurred in 19 out of 22 cases with well-preserved preoperative hearing. Only three ears maintained their preoperative good hearing. Hearing was preserved in cases of small schwannoma not exceeding 2 cm. Among 21 patients who underwent bilateral operations hearing was preserved in 3 out of 7 cases when smaller tumor or better hearing level side was attempted at first surgery. In contrary none of the 14 patients retained hearing when the first operation concerned the worse-hearing ear. Among 14 tumors up to 2 cm there was only one case of moderately severe facial nerve dysfunction (House-Brackmann Grade IV) in the long follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Early surgical intervention for vestibular schwannoma in NF2 patient is a viable management strategy to maintain hearing function and preserve facial nerve function.

Ipsilateral cochlear implantation in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma in the only or best hearing ear and in patients with NF2

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cochlear implant (CI) performances in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients with bilateral vestibular schwannoma (VS) and in patients with sporadic VS in the only or better hearing ear. All patients with bilateral VS or sporadic VS in the only or better hearing ear who underwent cochlear implantation, either simultaneous to VS surgery or staged after treatment for VS, in the tumor side were chosen for the study. Postimplantation audiometric scores (sound detection, closed-set and open-set discrimination scores) and device use patterns were the main outcome measures. 15 patients were implanted. Eight patients (53 %) were NF2 and seven patients had VS in the only or better hearing ear. One patient was explanted for cerebrospinal fluid leak. In the CI-only condition, the other 14 patients obtained sound detection, 64 % of them achieving open-set discrimination (mean 70 ± 38 %) and 85 % achieving closed-set discrimination (mean 41 ± 33 %). At the last follow-up 10 patients (67 %) were using the CI. Cochlear implantation provides hearing in particular cases of patients with bilateral VS or VS in the only or better hearing ear. As long as anatomic preservation of the cochlear nerve is achieved, cochlear implantation may offer improvement in communication skills for most patients.

English consensus protocol evaluating candidacy for auditory brainstem and cochlear implantation in neurofibromatosis type 2

OBJECTIVE

Hearing loss resulting from bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VSs) has a significant effect on the quality of life of patients with neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2). A national consensus protocol was produced in England as a guide for cochlear implantation (CI) and auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) in these patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Consensus statement.

SETTING

English NF2 Service.

PARTICIPANTS

Clinicians from all 4 lead NF2 units in England.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A protocol for the assessment, insertion and rehabilitation of CI and ABI in NF2 patients.

RESULTS

Patients should undergo more detailed hearing assessment once their maximum aided speech discrimination score falls below 50% in the better hearing ear. Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentence testing scores below 50% should trigger assessment for auditory implantation, as recommended by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidelines on CI. Where this occurs in patients with bilateral stable VS or a unilateral stable VS where the contralateral cochlear nerve was lost at previous surgery, CI should be considered. Where VS surgery is planned, CI should be considered where cochlear nerve preservation is thought possible, otherwise an ABI should be considered. Intraoperative testing using electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses or cochlear nerve action potentials may be used to determine whether a CI or ABI is inserted.

CONCLUSION

The NF2 centers in England agreed on this protocol. Multisite, prospective assessments of standardized protocols for auditory implantation in NF2 provide an essential model for evaluating candidacy and outcomes in this challenging patient population.

Cochlear obliteration after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery

The objective of the study was to determine the temporal occurrence of cochlear obliteration following translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma resection. A retrospective chart review, cross-sectional study, and sequential analysis of the time series were performed. The retrospective study included patients undergoing translabyrinthine resection for stage T1-T2 vestibular schwannoma from 2007 to 2010 without prior therapy and postoperative follow-up including MRI of the brain and the cerebellopontine angle. Already 3 months after surgery a radiographic labyrinthine change was observed in 66.7 %, a partial obstruction in 50 %, and an obstruction limited to the saccule in 16.7 %. Only 33.3 % of the patients showed an unchanged inner ear. In consideration of early cochlear obstruction after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma resection, temporary follow-up is necessary. Since the indications for cochlear implantation (CI) have been extended, especially concerning patients with single-side deafness, a simultaneous or early second-stage CI after tumour removal should be discussed.