Gross-total resection outcomes in an elderly population with glioblastoma: a SEER-based analysis

Prognostic value of surgical resection over biopsy in elderly patients with glioblastoma: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Maximal-safe resection has been shown to improve overall survival in elderly patients with glioblastoma in observational studies, however, the only clinical trial comparing resection versus biopsy in elderly patients with surgically-accessible glioblastoma showed no improvements in overall survival. A meta-analysis is needed to assess whether surgical resection of glioblastoma in older patients improves surgical outcomes when compared to biopsy alone.

METHODS

A search was conducted until October 9th, 2023, to identify published studies reporting the clinical outcomes of glioblastoma patients > 65 years undergoing resection or biopsy (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE). Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and complications. We analyzed mean difference (MD) and hazard ratio (HR) for survival outcomes. Postoperative complications were analyzed as a dichotomic categorical variable with risk ratio (RR).

RESULTS

From 784 articles, 20 cohort studies and 1 randomized controlled trial met our inclusion criteria, considering 20,523 patients for analysis. Patients undergoing surgical resection had an overall survival MD of 6.13 months (CI 95%=2.43-9.82, p = < 0.001) with a HR of 0.43 (95% CI = 0.35-0.52, p = < 0.00001). The progression-free survival MD was 2.34 months (95%CI = 0.79-3.89, p = 0.003) with a 0.50 h favoring resection (95%CI = 0.37-0.68, p = < 0.00001). The complication RR was higher in the resection group favoring biopsy (1.49, 95%CI = 1.06-2.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis suggests that upfront resection is associated with improved overall survival and progression-free survival in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma over biopsy. However, postoperative complications are more common with resection. Future clinical trials are essential to provide more robust evaluation in this challenging patient population.

The oncological role of resection in newly diagnosed diffuse adult-type glioma defined by the WHO 2021 classification: a Review by the RANO resect group

Glioma resection is associated with prolonged survival, but neuro-oncological trials have frequently refrained from quantifying the extent of resection. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) resect group is an international, multidisciplinary group that aims to standardise research practice by delineating the oncological role of surgery in diffuse adult-type gliomas as defined per WHO 2021 classification. Favourable survival effects of more extensive resection unfold over months to decades depending on the molecular tumour profile. In tumours with a more aggressive natural history, supramaximal resection might correlate with additional survival benefit. Weighing the expected survival benefits of resection as dictated by molecular tumour profiles against clinical factors, including the introduction of neurological deficits, we propose an algorithm to estimate the oncological effects of surgery for newly diagnosed gliomas. The algorithm serves to select patients who might benefit most from extensive resection and to emphasise the relevance of quantifying the extent of resection in clinical trials.

The detrimental effect of biopsy preceding resection in surgically accessible glioblastoma: results from the national cancer database

PURPOSE

Aggressive resection in surgically-accessible glioblastoma (GBM) correlates with improved survival over less extensive resections. However, the clinical impact of performing a biopsy before definitive resection have not been previously evaluated.

METHODS

We analyzed 17,334 GBM patients from the NCDB from 2010-2014. We categorized them into: "upfront resection" and "biopsy followed by resection". The outcomes of interes included OS, 30-day readmission/mortality, 90-day mortality, and length of hospital stay (LOS). The Kaplan-Meier methods and accelerated failure time (AFT) models were applied for survival analysis. Multivariable binary logistic regression were performed to compare differences among groups. Multiple imputation and propensity score matching (PSM) were conducted for validation.

RESULTS

"Upfront resection" had superior OS over "biopsy followed by resection" (median OS:12.4 versus 11.1 months, log-rank p = 0.001). Similarly, multivariable AFT models favored "upfront resection" (time ratio[TR]:0.83, 95%CI: 0.75-0.93, p = 0.001). Patients undergoing "upfront gross-total resection (GTR)" had higher OS over "upfront subtotal resection (STR)", "GTR following STR", and "GTR or STR following initial biopsy" (14.4 vs. 10.3, 13.5, 13.3, and 9.1 months;TR: 1.00 [Ref.], 0.75, 0.82, 0.88, and 0.67). Recent years of diagnosis, higher income, facilities located in Southern regions, and treatment at academic facilities were significantly associated with the higher likelihood of undergoing upfront resection. Multivariable regression showed a decreased 30 and 90-day mortality for patients undergoing "upfront resection", 73% and 44%, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative biopsies for surgically accessible GBM are associated with worse survival despite subsequent resection compared to patients undergoing upfront resection.

Management of glioblastoma in elderly patients: A review of the literature

High grade gliomas are the most common primary aggressive brain tumours with a very poor prognosis and a median survival of less than 2 years. The standard management protocol of newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients involves surgery followed by radiotherapy, chemotherapy in the form of temozolomide and further adjuvant temozolomide. The recent advances in molecular profiling of high-grade gliomas have further enhanced our understanding of the disease. Although the management of glioblastoma is standardised in newly diagnosed adult patients there is a lot of debate regarding the best treatment approach for the newly diagnosed elderly glioblastoma patients. In this review article we attempt to summarise the findings regarding surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and their combination in order to offer the best possible management modality for this group of patients. Elderly patients 65-70 with an excellent functional level could be considered as candidates for the standards treatment consisting of surgery, standard radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. Similarly, elderly patients above 70 with good functional status could receive the above with the exception of receiving a shorter course of radiotherapy instead of standard. In elderly GBM patients with poorer functional status and MGMT promoter methylation temozolomide chemotherapy can be considered. For elderly patients who cannot tolerate chemotherapy, hypofractionated radiotherapy is an option. In contrast to the younger adult patients, it seems that a careful individualised approach is a key element in deciding the best treatment options for this group of patients.

Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of infratentorial glioblastoma in the elderly

INTRODUCTION

Infratentorial glioblastoma(itGBM) is a rare and rapidly progressive form of GBM with poor prognosis. However, no studies have adequately examined itGBM outcomes in elderly patients (>65 years). Here, we used a national database to fill this knowledge gap.

METHODS

SEER 18 registries were utilized to identify adult itGBM patients diagnosed between 2000-2016. itGBM cases were further divided into cerebellar and brainstem GBM as cGBM and bGBM, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox hazards proportional regression models were performed to assess factors associated with overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Among 137 (33%) elderly patients from the study cohort (N = 420), median age was 74 years, 38% were female, and 85% were white. Median OS in elderly itGBM patients was shorter than younger adults (10 vs. 5-months, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis by tumor location revealed that older age was associated with poor survival for cGBM, but not for bGBM. Gross-total resection (GTR) was associated with better outcomes for both cGBM and bGBM. Radiotherapy had survival benefits for cGBM; meanwhile, chemotherapy prolonged OS in bGBM. In the elderly, advanced age (80 + years) was associated with poor outcomes, while GTR, CT and RT were all associated with improved survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, while elderly patients had worse survival compared to younger adults for both cGBM and bGBM, GTR improved OS in elderly itGBM, with CT and RT exhibiting a location-dependent survival benefit. Thus, elderly itGBM patients should undergo a combination of maximal resection and adjuvant treatment guided by infratentorial tumor location for maximal survival benefit.

Risk prediction and treatment assessment in glioma patients using SEER database: a prospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

To use a nomogram to predict the risk of mortality and estimate the impact of current treatment on the prognosis of glioma patients.

METHODS

A total of 3798 cases were obtained from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database according to the selection criteria. A nomogram was built on the independent clinical factors screened by the variance inflation factor, univariate analyses and a multivariate Cox regression model. Then, categorising the overall population into high-risk, medium-risk and low-risk groups using nomogram-derived risk scores, to study the impact of treatment on different subgroups' survival outcomes. Furthermore, based on the postmatch cohorts, the influences of treatment on survival outcomes were assessed by the log-rank test.

RESULT

Age, race, stage of disease, histological type, histological grade, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy were identified as the independent prognostic factors. A nomogram with good discrimination and consistency was built. Generally, the patients who underwent surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy were more likely to achieve better prognosis than those who did not, except for those who received radiotherapy in the low-risk cohort and those who underwent surgery in the high-risk cohort. Furthermore, the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH1/2) wild-type patients with surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy tended to have higher survival probabilities, while some inconsistent results were observed in the IDH mutant-type cohort.

CONCLUSION

Surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy improved the prognosis, while appropriate selection of topical treatment for the low-risk or high-risk patients deserves further consideration. IDH status gene might be a reliable indicator of therapeutic effectiveness.

Extent of Resection and Outcomes of Patients with Primary Malignant Brain Tumors

OPINION STATEMENT

We have level II evidence that attempting a gross total resection of newly diagnosed suspected glioblastoma is preferred when a maximally safe resection can be attempted. This recommendation extends to elderly patients and those with butterfly gliomas. However, in cases where patients are poor surgical candidates, or for lesions in eloquent areas, subtotal resection or biopsy may be indicated. Recent studies have discussed "supramaximal surgery," which is defined in different ways by different teams, but there is not enough evidence, yet, to make a consistent recommendation for supramaximal resection for specific patients.

Consulting a neurosurgeon upon initial medical assessment reduces the time to the first surgery and potentially contributes to improved prognosis for glioblastoma patients

BACKGROUND

The neurological status of glioblastoma patients rapidly deteriorates. We recently demonstrated that early diagnosis and surgery within 3 weeks from the initial symptoms are associated with improved survival. While glioblastoma is a semi-urgent disease, the prehospital behaviors and clinical outcomes of glioblastoma patients are poorly understood. We aimed to disclose how prehospital patient behavior influences the clinical outcomes of glioblastoma patients.

METHODS

Isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype glioblastoma patients treated at our institution between January 2010 and December 2019 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups, neurosurgeon and non-neurosurgeon groups, based on the primary doctor whom patients sought for an initial evaluation. Patient demographics and prognoses were examined.

RESULTS

Of 170 patients, 109 and 61 were classified into the neurosurgeon and non-neurosurgeon groups, respectively. The median age of neurosurgeon group was significantly younger than the non-neurosurgeon group (61 vs. 69 years old, P = 0.019) and in better performance status (preoperative Karnofsky performance status scores $\ge$80: 72.5 vs. 55.7%, P = 0.027). The neurosurgeon group exhibited a significantly shorter duration from the first hospital visit to the first surgery than the non-neurosurgeon group (18 vs. 29 days, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the overall survival of the neurosurgeon group was significantly more prolonged than that of the non-neurosurgeon group (22.9 vs. 14.0 months, P = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

Seeking an initial evaluation by a neurosurgeon was potentially associated with prolonged survival in glioblastoma patients. A short duration from the first hospital visit to the first surgery is essential in enhancing glioblastoma patient prognosis.

Prognostic nomogram for glioblastoma (GBM) patients presenting with distant extension: a seer-based study

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) with distant extension is rarely reported. We retrieved the data of GBM patients from the SEER database to identify the prognostic factors of GBM with distant extension and constructed a nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) of these patients.

METHODS

The data of GBM patients between 2003 and 2018 were retrieved from the SEER Database. 181 GBM patients with distant extension were randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 129) and the validation cohort (n = 52) at a ratio of 7:3. The prognostic factors associated with the OS of the GBM patients were identified through univariate and multivariate cox analyses. A nomogram was constructed based on the training cohort to predict OS, and its clinical value was verified using the validation cohort data.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the prognosis was significantly worse for GBM patients with distant extension than GBM patients without distant extension. Stage (GBM patients with distant extension) was independent prognostic factor of survival. Multivariate Cox analyses demonstrated that age, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy were independent risk factors for OS of GBM patients presenting with distant extension. The C-indexes of the nomogram for predicting OS were 0.755 (95% CI 0.713-0.797) and 0.757 (95% CI 0.703-0.811) for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration curves of both cohorts showed good consistency. The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting 0.25-year, 0.5-year and 1-year OS in the training cohort were 0.793, 0.864 and 0.867, respectively, and that in the validation cohort were 0.845, 0.828 and 0.803, respectively. The decision curve analysis (DCA) curves showed that the model to predict the 0.25-year, 0.5-year and 1-year OS probabilities was good.

CONCLUSION

Stage (GBM patients with distant extension) is independent prognostic factor for GBM patients. Age, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are independent prognostic factors for GBM patients presenting with distant extension, and the nomogram based on these factors can accurately predict the 0.25-year, 0.5-year and 1-year OS of these patients.

Carmustine wafer implantation for supratentorial glioblastomas, IDH-wildtype in "extreme" neurosurgical conditions

We assessed the feasibility of Carmustine wafer implantation in "extreme" conditions (i.e. patients > 80 years and Karnofsky Performance Status score < 50) and of implantation ≥ 12 Carmustine wafers in adult patients harbouring a newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. We performed an observational, retrospective single-centre cohort study at a tertiary surgical neuro-oncological centre between January 2006 and December 2021. Four hundred eighty patients who benefited from a surgical resection at first-line treatment were included. We showed that Carmustine wafer implantation in patients > 80 years, in patients with a Karnofsky performance status score < 50, and that implantation ≥ 12 Carmustine wafers (1) did not increase overall postoperative complication rates, (2) did not affect the completion of standard radiochemotherapy protocol, (3) did not worsen the postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status scores, and (4) did not significantly affect the time to oncological treatment. We showed that the implantation of ≥ 12 Carmustine wafers improved progression-free survival (31.0 versus 10.0 months, p = 0.025) and overall survival (39.0 versus 16.5 months, p = 0.041) without increasing postoperative complication rates. Carmustine wafer implantation during the surgical resection of a newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype is safe and efficient in patients > 80 years and in patients with preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score < 50. The number of Carmustine wafers should be adapted (up to 16 in our experience) to the resection cavity to improve survival without increasing postoperative overall complication rates.

Surgery for glioblastomas in the elderly: an Association des Neuro-oncologues d'Expression Française (ANOCEF) trial

OBJECTIVE

The role of surgery in the treatment of malignant gliomas in the elderly is not settled. The authors conducted a randomized trial that compared tumor resection with biopsy only-both followed by standard therapy-in such patients.

METHODS

Patients ≥ 70 years of age with a Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score ≥ 50 and presenting with a radiological suspicion of operable glioblastoma (GBM) were randomly assigned between tumor resection and biopsy groups. Subsequently, they underwent standard radiotherapy during the first years of the trial (2008-2017), with the addition of adjunct therapy with temozolomide when this regimen became standard (2017-2019). The primary endpoint was survival, and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), cognitive status (Mini-Mental State Examination), autonomy (KPS), quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20), and perioperative morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2019, 107 patients from 9 centers were enrolled in the study; 101 were evaluable for analysis because a GBM was histologically confirmed (50 in the surgery arm and 51 in the biopsy arm). There was no statistically significant difference in median survival between the surgery (9.37 months) and the biopsy (8.96 months, p = 0.36) arms (adjusted HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.52-1.21, p = 0.28). However, the surgery group had an increased PFS (5.06 vs 4.02 months; p = 0.034) (adjusted HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.78, p = 0.002). Less deterioration of quality of life and KPS score evolution than in the biopsy group was observed. Surgery was not associated with increased mortality or morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that debulking surgery is safe, and-compared to biopsy-is associated with a less severe deterioration of quality of life and autonomy, as well as a significant although modest improvement of PFS in elderly patients suffering from newly diagnosed malignant glioma. Although resection does not provide a significant survival benefit in the elderly, the authors believe that the risk/benefit analysis favors an attempt at optimal tumor resection in this population, provided there is careful preoperative geriatric evaluation. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02892708 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Surgical management of Glioma Grade 4: technical update from the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®): a systematic review

PURPOSE

The extent of resection (EOR) is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in adult patients with Glioma Grade 4 (GG4). The aim of the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®) was to provide a general overview of the current trends and technical tools to reach this goal.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed. The results were divided and ordered, by an expert team of surgeons, to assess the Class of Evidence (CE) and Strength of Recommendation (SR) of perioperative drugs management, imaging, surgery, intraoperative imaging, estimation of EOR, surgery at tumor progression and surgery in elderly patients.

RESULTS

A total of 352 studies were identified, including 299 retrospective studies and 53 reviews/meta-analysis. The use of Dexamethasone and the avoidance of prophylaxis with anti-seizure medications reached a CE I and SR A. A preoperative imaging standard protocol was defined with CE II and SR B and usefulness of an early postoperative MRI, with CE II and SR B. The EOR was defined the strongest independent risk factor for both OS and tumor recurrence with CE II and SR B. For intraoperative imaging only the use of 5-ALA reached a CE II and SR B. The estimation of EOR was established to be fundamental in planning postoperative adjuvant treatments with CE II and SR B and the stereotactic image-guided brain biopsy to be the procedure of choice when an extensive surgical resection is not feasible (CE II and SR B).

CONCLUSIONS

A growing number of evidences evidence support the role of maximal safe resection as primary OS predictor in GG4 patients. The ongoing development of intraoperative techniques for a precise real-time identification of peritumoral functional pathways enables surgeons to maximize EOR minimizing the post-operative morbidity.

Surgeon experience in glioblastoma surgery of the elderly-a multicenter, retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of individual surgeon experience on overall survival (OS), extent of resection (EOR) and surgery-related morbidity in elderly patients with glioblastoma (GBM), we performed a retrospective case-by-case analysis.

METHODS

GBM patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent tumor resection at two academic centers were analyzed. The experience of each neurosurgeon was quantified in three ways: (1) total number of previously performed glioma surgeries (lifetime experience); (2) number of surgeries performed in the previous five years (medium-term experience) and (3) in the last two years (short-term experience). Surgeon experience data was correlated with survival (OS) and surrogate parameters for surgical quality (EOR, morbidity).

RESULTS

198 GBM patients (median age 73.0 years, median preoperative KPS 80, IDH-wildtype status 96.5%) were included. Median OS was 10.0 months (95% CI 8.0-12.0); median EOR was 89.4%. Surgery-related morbidity affected 19.7% patients. No correlations of lifetime surgeon experience with OS (P = .693), EOR (P = .693), and surgery-related morbidity (P = .435) were identified. Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved OS (P < .001); patients with surgery-related morbidity were less likely to receive adjuvant treatment (P = .002). In multivariable testing, adjuvant therapy (P < .001; HR = 0.064, 95%CI 0.028-0.144) remained the only significant predictor for improved OS.

CONCLUSION

Less experienced neurosurgeons achieve similar surgical results and outcome in elderly GBM patients within the setting of academic teaching hospitals. Adjuvant treatment and avoidance of surgery-related morbidity are crucial for generating a treatment benefit for this cohort.

A Case Series of Surgical Resection of Anterior and Posterior Butterfly Glioma Grade 4 via a Minimally Invasive Keyhole Approach

Surgical resection of infiltrating glial neoplasms has proven to improve quality of life and confer a significant survival benefit. As accumulating evidence cements the role of surgery in grade 4 gliomas, there is a general trend to transition away from traditional large craniotomies to smaller 'keyhole' approaches, which aim to reduce the trauma and complication profiles associated with large exposures. A keyhole approach uses a small craniotomy positioned perfectly to reach at least all the target structures that a conventional approach would reach. We present a case series of operated butterfly gliomas grade 4 patients through keyhole approaches. All three operated patients have better survival than the literature biopsy groups. The resection of butterfly gliomas should be considered in selected cases. For some patients, it is feasible with the technology used nowadays, with improved quality of life and better survival prognosis.

Signaling pathways and therapeutic approaches in glioblastoma multiforme (Review)

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive type of primary brain tumor and is associated with a poor clinical prognosis. Despite the progress in the understanding of the molecular and genetic changes that promote tumorigenesis, effective treatment options are limited. The present review intended to identify and summarize major signaling pathways and genetic abnormalities involved in the pathogenesis of GBM, as well as therapies that target these pathways. Glioblastoma remains a difficult to treat tumor; however, in the last two decades, significant improvements in the understanding of GBM biology have enabled advances in available therapeutics. Significant genomic events and signaling pathway disruptions (NF‑κB, Wnt, PI3K/AKT/mTOR) involved in the formation of GBM were discussed. Current therapeutic options may only marginally prolong survival and the current standard of therapy cures only a small fraction of patients. As a result, there is an unmet requirement for further study into the processes of glioblastoma pathogenesis and the discovery of novel therapeutic targets in novel signaling pathways implicated in the evolution of glioblastoma.

Surgical Management of Malignant Glioma in the Elderly

Background

The median age for diagnosis of glioblastoma is 64 years and the incidence rises with increasing age to a peak at 75-84 years. As the total number of high-grade glioma patients is expected to increase with an aging population, neuro-oncological surgery faces new treatment challenges, especially regarding aggressiveness of the surgical approach and extent of resection. In the elderly, aspects like frailty and functional recovery time have to be taken into account before performing surgery.

Material & Methods

Patients undergoing surgery for malignant glioma (WHO grade III and IV) at our institution between 2015 and 2020 were compiled in a centralized tumor database and analyzed retrospectively. Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) were used to determine functional performance pre- and postoperatively. Overall survival (OS) was compared between age groups of 65-69 years, 70-74 years, 75-79 years, 80-84 years and >85 years in view of extent of resection (EOR). Furthermore, we performed a literature evaluation focusing on surgical treatment of newly diagnosed malignant glioma in the elderly.

Results

We analyzed 121 patients aged 65 years and above (range 65 to 88, mean 74 years). Mean overall survival (OS) was 10.35 months (SD = 11.38). Of all patients, only a minority (22.3%) received tumor biopsy instead of gross total resection (GTR, 61.2%) or subtotal resection (STR, 16.5%). Postoperatively, 52.9% of patients were treated according to the Stupp protocol. OS differed significantly between extent of resection (EOR) groups (4.0 months after biopsy vs. 8.3 after STR vs. 13.8 after GTR, p < 0.05 and p < 0.001 correspondingly). No significant difference was observed regarding EOR across different age groups.

Conclusion

GTR should be the treatment of choice also in elderly patients with malignant glioma as functional outcome and survival after surgery are remarkably better compared to less aggressive treatment. Elderly patients who received GTR of high-grade gliomas survived significantly longer compared to patients who underwent biopsy and STR. Age seems to have little influence on overall survival in selected surgically extensive treated patients, but high preoperative functional performance is mandatory.

Surgical treatment of diffuse and multi-lobes involved glioma with the assistance of a multimodal technique

Diffuse and multi-lobes involved glioma (DMG) is a rare disease, and the aim of this study was to assess the role of multimodal-assisted surgical resection of tumours combined with chemoradiotherapy and identify prognosis. Clinical data were collected from 38 patients with a diagnosis of DMG. Nineteen patients received multimodal-assisted surgical resection of tumours combined with chemoradiotherapy, and another 19 patients underwent chemoradiotherapy alone after stereotactic puncture biopsy. The clinical characteristics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, histopathological diagnosis, progression-free survival, and overall survival of DMG patients were retrospectively analysed. Twenty-six males and 12 females were included, and the age of the participants ranged from 10 to 80 years (46.34 ± 15.61). The median overall survival in our study was 25 months, and the progression-free survival was 17 months. The extent of resection was 50.10–73.60% (62.54% ± 7.92%). The preoperative and the postoperative KPS score of the patients in the operation group showed no statistically significant difference. The results of logistic regression demonstrated that overall survival was positively associated with operative treatment + chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.003) but negatively associated with age and corpus callosal involvement (p = 0.028 and 0.022, respectively). Kaplan–Meier analyses showed that those who underwent surgical treatment had a significant progression-free and overall survival benefit compared to those who did not undergo surgical treatment (log-rank test; p = 0.011 and 0.008, respectively). Older age and involvement of the corpus callosum represent a poor prognosis in DMG patients. Multimodal-assisted surgical resection of tumours combined with chemoradiotherapy might be a treatment option for DMG. Further research is needed to obtain the clear evidence of the effect of surgical treatment.

Utility of Administrative Databases and Big Data on Understanding Glioma Treatment—A Systematic Review

Background Gliomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors where large multicenter clinical and genetic studies have become increasingly popular in their understanding. We reviewed and analyzed the findings from large databases in gliomas, seeking to understand clinically relevant information.

Methods A systematic review was performed for gliomas studied using large administrative databases up to January 2020 (e.g., National Inpatient Sample [NIS], National Surgical Quality Improvement Program [NSQIP], and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program [SEER], National Cancer Database [NCDB], and others).

Results Out of 390 screened studies, 122 were analyzed. Studies included a wide range of gliomas including low- and high-grade gliomas. The SEER database (n = 83) was the most used database followed by NCDB (n = 28). The most common pathologies included glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) (n = 67), with the next category including mixes of grades II to IV glioma (n = 31). Common study themes involved evaluation of descriptive epidemiological trends, prognostic factors, comparison of different pathologies, and evaluation of outcome trends over time. Persistent health care disparities in patient outcomes were frequently seen depending on race, marital status, insurance status, hospital volume, and location, which did not change over time. Most studies showed improvement in survival because of advances in surgical and adjuvant treatments.

Conclusions This study helps summarize the use of clinical administrative databases in gliomas research, informing on socioeconomic issues, surgical outcomes, and adjuvant treatments over time on a national level. Large databases allow for some study questions that would not be possible with single institution data; however, limitations remain in data curation, analysis, and reporting methods.

Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma in Elderly Patients

Purpose of Review

Elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (eGBM) carry a worse prognosis compared with their younger counterparts. eGBM garners special attention due to the unique challenges, including increased treatment-associated toxicity, less relative benefit from aggressive therapy, medical comorbidities, and immunosuppression. The pivotal GBM trials excluded patients > 70 years old and the optimal treatment approach remains unsettled for eGBM. In this review, we analyze the historical evidence-based data for treating eGBM and discuss the future direction for managing this vulnerable population.

Recent Findings

Treatment for eGBM continues to evolve. Therapy choice is guided by performance status and presence of O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. For eGBM with good performance status, combinatorial hypofractionated radiation therapy (hRT) and temozolomide should be recommended. For those with poor performance status, further stratification based on MGMT promoter methylation test result is recommended. Single-agent temozolomide is a viable treatment option for MGMT methylated tumors (mMGMT); in particular, those classified with receptor tyrosine kinase II methylation. hRT alone can be considered in MGMT unmethylated (uMGMT) eGBM patients. As precision oncology continues to advance, effective targeted and immunotherapy may emerge as new treatment options for eGBM.

Summary

Management of elderly patients with newly diagnosed GBM carries a unique set of challenges. Progress has been made in defining the optimal therapeutic approach for these patients, but many questions remain to be answered.

Outcome of glioblastoma resection in patients 80 years of age and older

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role and possible complications of tumor resection in the management of glioblastoma (GBM) in a series of patients 80 years of age and older with review of literature.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed cases involving patients 80 years or older who underwent biopsy or initial resection of GBM at their hospital between 2007 and 2018. A total of 117 patients (mean age 82 years) met the inclusion criteria; 57 had resection (group A) and 60 had biopsy (group B). Functional outcomes and survival at follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

Group A differed significantly from group B at baseline in having better WHO performance status, better ASA scores, more right-sided tumors, and no basal ganglia or "butterfly" gliomas. Nevertheless, 56% of group A patients had an ASA score of 3. Median survival was 9.5 months (95% CI 8-17 months) in group A, 4 months (95% CI 3.5-6 months) in group B, and 17.5 months (95% CI 12-24 months) in the 56% of group A patients treated with resection and Stupp protocol. Rates of postoperative neurologic and medical complications were almost identical in the 2 groups, but the rate of surgical site complications was substantially greater in group A (12% vs 5%). There was no significant difference in mean preoperative and postoperative KPS scores (group A).

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients 80 years or older, radical removal of GBM was associated with acceptable survival and a low perioperative complication rate which is comparable to that of a biopsy. Although the median survival of the whole group was lower than reported for younger patients, a subgroup amenable to radical surgery and Stupp protocol achieved a median survival of 17.5 months.

Surgical and oncological score to estimate the survival benefit of resection and chemoradiotherapy in elderly (≥70 years) glioblastoma patients: a preliminary analysis

Background

Elderly patients with glioblastoma are perceived to face a poor prognosis with perceptions surrounding older age and a relative lack of randomized data contributing. This study evaluated survival prognosticators in elderly glioblastoma patients to more accurately guide their treatment.

Methods

The records of 169 elderly (≥70 years) patients with a new diagnosis of glioblastoma who had undergone neurosurgical intervention were retrospectively examined for patient sex, age, performance status, comorbidities, MGMT promoter methylation, surgical intervention, and chemoradiation regime. The adjusted survival impact of these factors was determined using Cox proportional hazards model and used to devise a two-stage scoring system to estimate patient survival at the stage of surgical (Elderly Glioblastoma Surgical Score, EGSS) and oncological management (Elderly Glioblastoma Oncological Score, EGOS).

Results

The median overall survival (mOS) of the cohort was 28.8 weeks. Gross-total and subtotal resection were associated with improved survival compared to biopsy alone (respective mOS 65.3 and 28.1 vs 15.7 weeks, P < .001). Hypofractionated radiotherapy (40Gy in 15 fractions) with Temozolomide was noninferior to the Stupp protocol, P = .72. Exploratory subgroup analysis revealed a significant benefit of Temozolomide-based approaches in MGMT-methylated patients as well as a trend towards improved survival in MGMT-unmethylated patients. Our EGSS and EGOS scores successfully estimated survival in this retrospective cohort with 65% and 73% accuracy.

Conclusions

Where appropriate and safe, elderly glioblastoma patients may benefit from surgical resection and combined chemoradiotherapy with Temozolomide. The proposed EGSS and EGOS scores take into account important prognostic factors to help guide which patients should receive such treatment.

Treatment of Older Adult Patients with Glioblastoma: Moving towards the Inclusion of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for Guiding Management

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, and over half of patients with newly diagnosed GBM are over the age of 65. Management of glioblastoma in older patients includes maximal safe resection followed by either radiation, chemotherapy, or combined modality treatment. Despite recent advances in the treatment of older patients with GBM, survival is still only approximately 9 months compared to approximately 15 months for the general adult population, suggesting that further research is required to optimize management in the older population. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) has been shown to have a prognostic and predictive role in the management of older patients with other cancers, and domains of the CGA have demonstrated an association with outcomes in GBM in retrospective studies. Furthermore, the CGA and other geriatric assessment tools are now starting to be prospectively investigated in older GBM populations. This review aims to outline current treatment strategies for older patients with GBM, explore the rationale for inclusion of geriatric assessment in GBM management, and highlight recent data investigating its implementation into practice.

Efficacy, Outcome, and Safety of Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma in the 5-ALA Era: Single Center Experience of More Than 10 Years

Simple Summary

In the next decades, the incidence of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) will markedly increase due to the growth of the elderly population. Despite the increasing incidence of GBM, elderly patients are frequently excluded from clinical studies and thus, only few data are available specifically focusing on the elderly population. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy, outcome, and safety of surgically-treated GBM including resections and biopsies in the 5-ALA era in a large elderly cohort of altogether 272 patients. Our data of this large elderly cohort demonstrate for the first time the clinical utility and safety of 5-ALA fluorescence in GBM for improved tumor visualization in both resections as well as biopsies. Therefore, we recommend the use of 5-ALA not only in resections, but also in open/stereotactic biopsies to optimize the neurosurgical management of elderly GBM patients.

Abstract

Background: In the next decades, the incidence of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) will increase due to the growth of the elderly population. Fluorescence-guided resection using 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is widely applied to achieve maximal safe resection of GBM and is identified as a novel intraoperative marker for diagnostic tissue during biopsies. However, detailed analyses of the use of 5-ALA in resections as well as biopsies in a large elderly cohort are still missing. The aim of this study was thus to investigate the efficacy, outcome, and safety of surgically- treated GBM in the 5-ALA era in a large elderly cohort. Methods: All GBM patients aged 65 years or older who underwent neurosurgical intervention between 2007 and 2019 were included. Data on 5-ALA application, intraoperative fluorescence status, and 5-ALA-related side effects were derived from our databank. In the case of resection, the tumor resectability and the extent of resection were determined. Potential prognostic parameters relevant for overall survival were analyzed. Results: 272 GBM patients with a median age of 71 years were included. Intraoperative 5-ALA fluorescence was applied in most neurosurgical procedures (n = 255/272, 88%) and visible fluorescence was detected in most cases (n = 252/255, 99%). In biopsies, 5-ALA was capable of visualizing tumor tissue by visible fluorescence in all but one case (n = 91/92, 99%). 5-ALA administration did not result in any severe side effects. Regarding patient outcome, smaller preoperative tumor volume (<22.75 cm³), gross total resection, single lesions, improved postoperative neurological status, and concomitant radio-chemotherapy showed a significantly longer overall survival. Conclusions: Our data of this large elderly cohort demonstrate the clinical utility and safety of 5-ALA fluorescence in GBM for improved tumor visualization in both resections as well as biopsies. Therefore, we recommend the use of 5-ALA not only in resections, but also in open/stereotactic biopsies to optimize the neurosurgical management of elderly GBM patients.

Surgical strategies for older patients with glioblastoma

Objective

While adjuvant treatment regimens have been modified for older patients with glioblastoma (GBM), surgical strategies have not been tailored.

Methods

Clinical data of 48 consecutive patients aged 70 years or older, who underwent surgical resection for GBM with intraoperative ultrasonography (IoUS) alone or combination with intraoperative MRI (IoMRI) at Yale New Haven Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Variables were analyzed, and comparative analyses were performed.

Results

The addition of IoMRI was not superior to IoUS alone in terms of overall survival (OS) (P = 0.306), Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) at postoperative 6 weeks (P = 0.704) or extent of resection (P = 0.263). Length of surgery (LOSx), however, was significantly longer (P = 0.0002) in the IoMRI group. LOSx (P = 0.015) and hospital stay (P = 0.025) were predictors of postoperative complications. Increased EOR (GTR or NTR) (P = 0.030), postoperative adjuvant treatment (P < 0.0001) and postoperative complications (P = 0.006) were predictive for OS. Patients with relatively lower preoperative KPS scores (<70) showed significant improvement at postoperative 6 weeks (P<0.0001). Patients with complications (P = 0.038) were more likely to have lower KPS at postoperative 6 weeks.

Conclusions

Aggressive management with surgical resection should be considered in older patients with GBM, even those with relatively poor KPS. The use of ioMRI in this population does not appear to confer any measurable benefit over ioUS in experienced hands, but prolongs the length of surgery significantly, which is a preventable prognostic factor for impeding care.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-021-03862-z.

Do elderly patients (≥ 75 years old) with glioblastoma benefit from more radical surgeries in the era of temozolomide?

This study assesses the effect of extent of resection (EOR) on the longer-term survival and early mortality of elderly patients (≥ 75 years old) with glioblastoma. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and data from our center to evaluate the effect of EOR on the long-term survival and early mortality of patients with glioblastoma. We included 50 elderly patients (≥ 75 years old) with glioblastoma visiting our hospital. The median overall survival of the patients who underwent a gross total resection, a subtotal resection, and a partial resection were 278, 200, and 83 days, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that gross total resection (HR: 0.100; 95% CI: 0.015-0.671, p < 0.001) and subtotal reresection (HR: 0.134, 95% CI: 0.022-0.831, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of favorable prognosis when compared with partial resection. The data extracted from the SEER database also indicated that EOR was an independent predictor of OS, CCS, and early mortality. The stratification analysis revealed that gross total resection was the best protective factor of OS, early mortality, and CCS. Radical resection may improve the OS and CCS of glioblastoma patients aged ≥ 75 years and decrease early mortality.

Predictors of survival in elderly patients undergoing surgery for glioblastoma

Background

Glioblastoma (GBM) has a median age of diagnosis of 64 years old and the incidence increases with age. An increasing number of elderly patients are being diagnosed with GBM and undergoing surgery. These patients often present with multiple medical comorbidities and have significantly worse outcomes compared to adult patients. The goal of this study was to determine clinical predictors of survival in elderly patients undergoing surgery for GBM.

Methods

Our brain tumor database was reviewed for all patients 65 years of age and older that underwent surgery for newly diagnosed GBM over a 14-year period from 2005 to 2018. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, complications, and treatment were collected. A total of 150 patients were included, and subdivided into two age categories; 65–74 years old and 75 years or older.

Results

The median OS for all patients was 9.4 months. Neither the presence nor number of medical comorbidities were associated with decreased survival (P = .9 and P = .1, respectively). Postoperative complications were associated with worse survival for all patients (HR = 2.34, P = .01) and occurred in patients in the older age category and patients with longer lengths of stay (P < .0001).

Conclusions

The presence of medical comorbidities is not a reason to exclude patients with GBM from surgical consideration. Excluding EOR and adjuvant treatment, postoperative complication is the most significant predictor of survival in elderly patients. Postoperative complications are associated with a longer LOS and are more common in patients 75 years of age and older.

Extent of resection and survival outcomes of geriatric patients with glioblastoma: Is there benefit from aggressive surgery?

OBJECTIVE

We examine the impact of age and extent of resection (EOR) on overall survival (OS) in geriatric patients with Glioblastoma (GBM).

METHODS

The SEER 18 Registries was used to identify patients aged 65 and above with GBM from 2000-2016. Patients were categorized into 4 groups based on EOR: Biopsy/Local Excision (B/LE), Subtotal Resection (STR), Gross Total Resection (GTR), and Supratotal Resection (SpTR). Primary endpoint was OS, which was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by the Log-rank and Wilcoxon-Breslow-Gehan test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was utilized to identify factors associated with OS. Likelihood of undergoing SpTR was explored using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results are given as median [IQR] and HR [95 % CI].

RESULTS

Among 17,820 geriatric patients with GBM, median age was 73 years [68-78], 44 % were female, 91 % White, and 8% Hispanic. SpTR was performed in 2907 (16 %), GTR was performed in 2451 (14 %) patients, STR in 4879 (28 %), and B/LE in 7396 (42 %). There was a decline in the proportion of patients treated with SpTR with advancing age (65-69 years, 17 % vs 95+ years, 0%; p < 0.0001), and older age corresponded with a decrease in the odds of undergoing SpTR. In survival analysis, GTR (HR 0.61 [0.58-0.65]) and SpTR (HR 0.65 [0.62-0.68]) were associated with improved survival, even in octogenarian patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that aggressive surgical resection is associated with improvement in OS in geriatric patients. These results emphasize that age should not influence surgical strategy, as there is a survival benefit from maximal resection in geriatric patients.

Cytoreductive surgery in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adults: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline update

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adults with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma.

QUESTION

What is the effect of extent of surgical resection on patient outcome in the initial management of adult patients with suspected newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATION

Level II: Maximal cytoreductive surgery is recommended in adult patients with suspected newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma with gross total resection defined as removal of contrast enhancing tumor. Level III: Biopsy, subtotal resection, or gross total resection is suggested depending on medical comorbidities, functional status, and location of tumor if maximal resection may cause significant neurologic deficit.

QUESTION

What is the role of cytoreductive surgery in adults with newly diagnosed bi-frontal "butterfly" glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: Resection of newly diagnosed bi-frontal "butterfly" glioblastoma is suggested to improve overall survival over biopsy alone.

QUESTION

What is the goal of cytoreductive surgery in elderly adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: Elderly patients (> 65 years) show survival benefit with gross total resection and it is suggested they undergo cytoreductive surgery.

QUESTION

What is the role of advanced intraoperative guidance techniques in cytoreductive surgery in adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: The use of intraoperative guidance adjuncts such as intraoperative MRI (iMRI) or 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) are suggested to maximize extent of resection in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. There is insufficient evidence to make a suggestion on the use of fluorescein, indocyanine green, or intraoperative ultrasound.

Ethical issues in geriatric cranial neurosurgery

The global demographic shift to an older population has led to the emergence of the new field of geriatric neurosurgery. Beyond the complexities of disease states and multimorbidity, advanced age brings with it intricate ethical issues pertaining to both the practice and provision of medical and surgical care. In this paper, the authors describe the central ethical themes seen across the spectrum of common neurosurgical conditions in the elderly and highlight the use of foundational ethical principles to help guide treatment decision-making.

Glioblastoma: Prognostic Factors and Predictive Response to Radio and Chemotherapy

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is characterized by poor prognosis despite an aggressive therapeutic strategy. In recent years, many advances have been achieved in the field of glioblastoma biology. Here we try to summarize the main clinical and biological factors impacting clinical prognostication and therapy of GBM patients. From that standpoint, hopefully, in the near future, personalized therapies will be available.

Management of glioblastoma: State of the art and future directions

Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor. Overall, the prognosis for patients with this disease is poor, with a median survival of <2 years. There is a slight predominance in males, and incidence increases with age. The standard approach to therapy in the newly diagnosed setting includes surgery followed by concurrent radiotherapy with temozolomide and further adjuvant temozolomide. Tumor-treating fields, delivering low-intensity alternating electric fields, can also be given concurrently with adjuvant temozolomide. At recurrence, there is no standard of care; however, surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy with chemotherapy or bevacizumab are all potential options, depending on the patient's circumstances. Supportive and palliative care remain important considerations throughout the disease course in the multimodality approach to management. The recently revised classification of glioblastoma based on molecular profiling, notably isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status, is a result of enhanced understanding of the underlying pathogenesis of disease. There is a clear need for better therapeutic options, and there have been substantial efforts exploring immunotherapy and precision oncology approaches. In contrast to other solid tumors, however, biological factors, such as the blood-brain barrier and the unique tumor and immune microenvironment, represent significant challenges in the development of novel therapies. Innovative clinical trial designs with biomarker-enrichment strategies are needed to ultimately improve the outcome of patients with glioblastoma.

Glioblastomas located in proximity to the subventricular zone (SVZ) exhibited enrichment of gene expression profiles associated with the cancer stem cell state

INTRODUCTION

Conflicting results have been reported in the association between glioblastoma proximity to the subventricular zone (SVZ) and enrichment of cancer stem cell properties. Here, we examined this hypothesis using magnetic resonance (MR) images derived from 217 The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) glioblastoma subjects.

METHODS

Pre-operative MR images were segmented automatically into contrast enhancing (CE) tumor volumes using Iterative Probabilistic Voxel Labeling (IPVL). Distances were calculated from the centroid of CE tumor volumes to the SVZ and correlated with gene expression profiles of the corresponding glioblastomas. Correlative analyses were performed between SVZ distance, gene expression patterns, and clinical survival.

RESULTS

Glioblastoma located in proximity to the SVZ showed increased mRNA expression patterns associated with the cancer stem-cell state, including CD133 (P = 0.006). Consistent with the previous observations suggesting that glioblastoma stem cells exhibit increased DNA repair capacity, glioblastomas in proximity to the SVZ also showed increased expression of DNA repair genes, including MGMT (P = 0.018). Reflecting this enhanced DNA repair capacity, the genomes of glioblastomas in SVZ proximity harbored fewer single nucleotide polymorphisms relative to those located distant to the SVZ (P = 0.003). Concordant with the notion that glioblastoma stem cells are more aggressive and refractory to therapy, patients with glioblastoma in proximity to SVZ exhibited poorer progression free and overall survival (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

An unbiased analysis of TCIA suggests that glioblastomas located in proximity to the SVZ exhibited mRNA expression profiles associated with stem cell properties, increased DNA repair capacity, and is associated with poor clinical survival.

Molecular genetic profiling reveals novel association between FLT3 mutation and survival in glioma

INTRODUCTION

Recent molecular characterization of gliomas has uncovered somatic gene variation and DNA methylation changes that are associated with etiology, prognosis, and therapeutic response. Here we describe genomic profiling of gliomas assessed for associations between genetic mutations and patient outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

METHODS

Mutations in a 50-gene cancer panel, 1p19q co-deletion, and MGMT promoter methylation (MGMT methylation) status were obtained from tumor tissue of 293 glioma patients. Multivariable regression models for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were constructed for MGMT methylation, 1p19q co-deletion, and gene mutations controlling for age, treatment status, and WHO grade.

RESULTS

Mutational profiles of gliomas significantly differed based on WHO Grade, such as high prevalence of BRAF V600E, IDH1, and PTEN mutations in WHO Grade I, II/III, and IV tumors, respectively. In multivariate regression analysis, MGMT methylation and IDH1 mutations were significantly associated with improved OS (HR = 0.44, p = 0.0004 and HR = 0.21, p = 0.007, respectively), while FLT3 and TP53 mutations were significantly associated with poorer OS (HR = 19.46, p < 0.0001 and HR = 1.67, p = 0.014, respectively). MGMT methylation and IDH1 mutations were the only significant alterations associated with improved RFS in the model (HR = 0.42, p < 0.0001 and HR = 0.37, p = 0.002, respectively). These factors were then included in a combined model, which significantly exceeded the predictive value of the base model alone (age, surgery, radiation, chemo, grade) (likelihood ratio test OS p = 1.64 × 10^-8 and RFS p = 3.80 × 10^-7).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the genomic landscape of gliomas in a single-institution cohort and identifies a novel association between FLT3 mutation and OS in gliomas.

Proliferation-dominant high-grade astrocytoma: survival benefit associated with extensive resection of FLAIR abnormality region

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between extent of resection (EOR) and survival in terms of clinical, molecular, and radiological factors in high-grade astrocytoma (HGA).

METHODS

Clinical and radiological data from 585 cases of molecularly defined HGA were reviewed. In each case, the EOR was evaluated twice: once according to contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (CE-T1WI) and once according to fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. The ratio of the volume of the region of abnormality in CE-T1WI to that in FLAIR images (VFLAIR/VCE-T1WI) was calculated and a receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff value for that ratio. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the prognostic value of each factor.

RESULTS

Both the EOR evaluated from CE-T1WI and the EOR evaluated from FLAIR could divide the whole cohort into 4 subgroups with different survival outcomes (p < 0.001). Cases were stratified into 2 subtypes based on VFLAIR/VCE-T1WI with a cutoff of 10: a proliferation-dominant subtype and a diffusion-dominant subtype. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant survival advantage for the proliferation-dominant subtype (p < 0.0001). The prognostic implication has been further confirmed in the Cox proportional hazards model (HR 1.105, 95% CI 1.078-1.134, p < 0.0001). The survival of patients with proliferation-dominant HGA was significantly prolonged in association with extensive resection of the FLAIR abnormality region beyond contrast-enhancing tumor (p = 0.03), while no survival benefit was observed in association with the extensive resection in the diffusion-dominant subtype (p = 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

VFLAIR/VCE-T1WI is an important classifier that could divide the HGA into 2 subtypes with distinct invasive features. Patients with proliferation-dominant HGA can benefit from extensive resection of the FLAIR abnormality region, which provides the theoretical basis for a personalized resection strategy.

Gross Total vs. Subtotal Resection on Survival Outcomes in Elderly Patients With High-Grade Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The optimal strategy for the management of high-grade glioma in the elderly (≥60.0 years) remains controversial, especially regarding the effects of surgical extent on survival outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare gross total resection (GTR) with subtotal resection (STR) for treatment effects in elderly patients with high-grade glioma.

Methods: Three electronic databases were systematically searched, including PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane library, from inception to August 2018. Hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to express summary effect estimates using the random-effects model. Nineteen retrospective observational studies involving a total of 10,815 elderly patients with high-grade glioma were included in this meta-analysis.

Results: The summary results indicated that GTR was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) compared with STR (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.64–0.77). In addition, elderly patients administered GTR showed lower risk of 3-month mortality (OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.24–0.93), 6-month mortality (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.26–0.56), 9-month mortality (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.25–0.49), and 1-year mortality (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.29–0.56). Pooled OS data differed when stratified by publication year, country, sample size, disease status, and study quality.

Conclusion: GTR seems to be more effective than STR in achieving longer survival in elderly patients with high-grade glioma.

Improved survival of glioblastoma patients treated at academic and high-volume facilities: a hospital-based study from the National Cancer Database

OBJECTIVE

The present study was designed to explore the association between facility type (academic center [AC] vs non-AC), facility volume (high-volume facility [HVF] vs low-volume facility [LVF]), and outcomes of glioblastoma (GBM) treatment.

METHODS

Based on the National Cancer Database (NCDB), GBM patients were categorized by treatment facility type (non-AC vs AC) and volume [4 categories (G1-G4): < 5.0, 5.0-14.9, 15.0-24.9, and ≥ 25.0, cases/year]. HVF was defined based on the 90th percentile of annual GBM cases (≥ 15.0 cases/year). Outcomes include overall survival (OS), the receipt of surgery and adjuvant therapies, 30-day readmission/mortality, 90-day mortality, and prolonged length of inpatient hospital stay (LOS). Kaplan-Meier methods and accelerated failure time (AFT) models were applied for survival analysis, and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to compare differences in the receipt of treatment and related short-term outcomes by facility type and volume.

RESULTS

A total of 40,256 GBM patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 were included. Patients treated at an AC & HVF experienced the longest survival (median OS: 13.3, 11.8, 11.1, and 10.3 months; time ratio [TR]: 1.00 [Ref.], 0.96, 0.92, and 0.89; for AC & HVF, AC & LVF, non-AC & HVF, and non-AC & LVF, respectively), regardless of care transition/treatment referral. Tumor resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were most frequently utilized in AC & HVF. Prolonged LOS, 30-day readmission, and 90-day mortality were decreased by 20%, 22%, and 16% (p ≤ 0.001), respectively, at AC & HVF.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence of superior outcomes when GBM patients are treated at AC and HVF. Standardization of health care across facility type and/or volume and comprehensive neuro-oncological care should be a potential goal in the management of GBM patients.

Supramaximal resection: A systematic review of its safety, efficacy and feasibility in glioblastoma

The philosophy of 'supramaximal resection' (SMR) beyond the T1-enhanced margin holds some potential in glioblastoma surgery, but the quality of available literature has not been elucidated. A systematic review of published studies of SMR in glioblastoma surgery was performed. Articles were sought in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register for Clinical Trials. The search items were grouped into three themes; supramaximal resection, glioblastoma and outcomes. Cases were included wherein the initial extent of resection was described as exceeding gross total resection, that is to say, beyond the area of T1-enhancement on MRI. Only newly diagnosed glioblastoma was considered. Articles containing primary patient data, including outcome data, were included; reviews, editorials, descriptive articles and systematic reviews were excluded. Subsequently, 1123 unique articles were initially retrieved. After screening article titles and abstracts for relevance to SMR in glioblastoma, seven articles remained, and were all included post-full text review. No randomized controlled trials were discovered. Almost all studies were of Level 4 quality, according to Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines. The included articles yielded a total of 2019 surgically treated glioblastoma patients, 13.5% of whom underwent SMR. Preliminary results suggest SMR of glioblastoma positively impacts overall and progression free survival. However, the contemporaneous literature supporting glioblastoma SMR is of low quality, with neither anatomical nor radiographic definitional consensus for what constitutes SMR. Prospective studies of larger pooled populations with standardized technical, radiological and outcome measures in designated centers would help minimize bias and validate SMR in appropriately selected glioblastoma patients.

Characteristics and prognostic factors of age-stratified high-grade intracranial glioma patients: A population-based analysis

We evaluated characteristics and different prognostic factors for survival in age-stratified high-grade glioma in a U.S. cohort. Eligible patients were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries and stratified into 3 age groups: 20-39 years old (1,043 patients), 40-59 years old (4,503 patients), and >60 years old (5,045 patients). Overall and cancer-related survival data were obtained. Cox models were built to analyze the outcomes and risk factors. It showed that race was a prognostic factor for survival in patients 40 to 59 years old and in patients ≥60 years old. Partial resection was associated with lower overall survival and cause-specific survival in all age groups (overall survival: 20-39 yr: HR = 6.41; 40-59 yr: HR = 4.84; >60 yr: HR = 5.06; cause-specific survival: 20-39 yr: HR = 5.87; 40-59 yr: HR = 4.01; >60 yr: HR = 3.36). The study highlights that, while some prognostic factors are universal, others are age-dependent. The effectiveness of treatment approaches differs for patients in different age groups. Results of this study may help to develop personalized treatment protocols for glioma patients of different ages.

Glioblastoma Multiforme in the over 70's: "To treat or not to treat with radiotherapy?"

BACKGROUND

The incidence of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is increasing among the older population and is associated with poor prognosis. Management guidelines are lacking in this group. The purpose of this study was to analyze survival data and determine predictors of survival in patients aged ≥70 years treated with radiotherapy (RT) and/or Temozolomide.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all GBM patients treated at our institution between January 2011 and January 2017 was carried out.

RESULTS

One-hundred and four patients were eligible. Median age was 73.8 years (70-87). Thirty-three patients received radical RT and 71 palliative RT. Overall median survival (MS) was 6 months. The MS was 10.6 months for radical patients and 4.9 months for palliative patients (P < 0.0005). The MS was 6.9 months in patients aged 70-75 years and 5.2 months in those aged 76-80 years (P = 0.004). The debulked group had a statistically significantly longer survival (8.0 months) than the biopsy only group (4.9 months). Biopsy only (hazard ratio [HR] 2.4), ECOG performance status 3 vs 0 (HR 6.4), and increasing age (HR 1.06) were associated with statistically significant shorter survival after adjustment for the effects of concurrent chemo, delay in starting RT, and RT dose.

CONCLUSION

The MS for radical patients was favorable and approaching current literature for the under 70 age group. Radical treatment should be considered for good performance patients aged 70-75 years. Increasing age was associated with shorter MS in patients aged ≥76 years. Debulking and good performance status were associated with improved survival.

Characteristics of treatment and outcome in elderly patients with brain glioblastoma: a retrospective analysis of case series

Treatment modalities affecting quality of life and survival in elderly brain glioblastoma patients are not well defined. A single-institution data were analyzed during a 3-year period to disclose prognostic difference in management related to age. Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), overall survival (OS), and adjuvant therapy were evaluated. The case group comprised of elderly patients (>75 years), while the control group included those of younger age (<65 years). The investigated variables were correlated between the groups. Twenty elderly patients and a corresponding number of younger ones were analyzed. Preoperative KPS >70 indicated longer overall survival. Statistically significant correlation was recorded in both the control (p=0.036) and case (p=0.0053) groups. Lower postoperative KPS was significantly correlated with shorter OS in elderly patients (p=0.023). The correlation between the extent of tumor resection and OS was statistically significant in younger patients only (p=0.04). Overall survival was significantly shorter in elderly patients regardless of the extent of tumor resection (p=0.0057). Adjuvant therapy was significantly associated with longer OS in both the case (p=0.032) and control (p=0.013) groups. Elderly population is a more endangered group of surgical brain glioblastoma patients having lower quality of life and shorter overall survival. The management protocol should be personalized for each individual case in this age group of patients to reduce postoperative complications and grant a satisfactory quality of life.

Tumor-induced mortality in adult primary supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme with different age subgroups

AIM

To assess the independent determinants of tumor-induced mortality in different age subgroups after considering competing risk (CR).

METHODS

Data were extracted from the SEER database. The independent determinants of tumor-induced mortality were defined by CR analysis and validated by conditional inference trees. A CR nomogram was created based on the proportional subdistribution hazard model.

RESULTS

The different age subgroups had their own independent determinants of tumor-induced mortality. Using these variables, a CR nomogram was built with good discrimination and calibration.

CONCLUSION

When conducting population-based cohort studies, a CR analysis is recommended for cancers with short survival and high mortality. A CR nomogram represents the first attempt at a predictive model for quantifying tumor-induced mortality.

Optimal extent of resection for glioblastoma according to site, extension, and size: a population-based study in the temozolomide era

The effect of the extent of resection (EOR) on prognosis in glioblastoma may differ depending on various conditions. We evaluated the prognostic impact of the EOR for glioblastoma according to the tumor site, extension, and size. Data from glioblastoma patients who underwent gross total resection (GTR), subtotal resection (STR), or open biopsy between 2005 and 2014 were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariate and multivariate analyses for overall survival (OS) were performed. Between 2005-2009 and 2010-2014, the proportion of GTR and STR performed increased from 41.4 to 42.3% and 33.0 to 37.1%, respectively. EOR only affected OS in the 3 years after diagnosis. Median survival in the GTR (n = 4155), STR (n = 3498), and open biopsy (n = 2258) groups was 17, 13, and 13 months, respectively (p < .001). STR showed no significant difference in OS from open biopsy (p = .33). GTR increased OS for midline-crossing tumors. Although STR was more frequently performed than GTR for tumors ≥ 6 cm in size, GTR significantly increased the OS rate relative to STR for tumors 6-8 cm in size (p = .001). For tumors ≥ 8 cm, STR was comparable to GTR (p = .61) and superior to open biopsy (p = .05). GTR needs to be performed more frequently for glioblastoma measuring ≥ 6 cm or that have crossed the midline to increase OS. STR was marginally superior to open biopsy when the tumor was ≥ 8 cm.

The impact of traveling distance and hospital volume on post-surgical outcomes for patients with glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

High-volume hospitals are associated with improved outcomes in glioblastoma (GBM). However, the impact of travel burden to high-volume centers is poorly understood. We examined post-operative outcomes between GBM patients that underwent treatment at local, low-volume hospitals with those that traveled long distances to high-volume hospitals.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for GBM patients that underwent surgery (2010-2014). We established two cohorts: patients in the lowest quartile of travel distance and volume (Short-travel/Low-Volume: STLV) and patients in the highest quartile of travel and volume (Long-travel/High-Volume: LTHV). Outcomes analyzed were 30-day, 90-day mortality, overall survival, 30-day readmission, and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Of 35,529 cases, STLV patients (n = 3414) traveled a median of 3 miles (Interquartile range [IQR] 1.8-4.2) to low-volume centers (5 [3-7] annual cases) and LTHV patients (n = 3808) traveled a median of 62 miles [44.1-111.3] to high-volume centers (48 [42-71]). LTHV patients were younger, had lower Charlson scores, largely received care at academic centers (84.4% vs 11.9%), were less likely to be minorities (8.1% vs 17.1%) or underinsured (6.9% vs 12.1), and were more likely to receive trimodality therapy (75.6% vs 69.2%; all p < 0.001). On adjusted analysis, LTHV predicted improved overall survival (HR 0.87, p = 0.002), decreased 90-day mortality (OR 0.72, p = 0.019), lower 30-day readmission (OR 0.42, p < 0.001), and shorter hospitalizations (RR 0.79, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Glioblastoma patients who travel farther to high-volume centers have superior post-operative outcomes compared to patients who receive treatment locally at low-volume centers. Strategies that facilitate patient travel to high-volume hospitals may improve outcomes.

Treatment of Glioblastoma in the Elderly

Clinical research in neuro-oncology frequently classifies patients over 60-70 years of age as 'elderly', a designation intended to identify patients with the disease characteristics, psychosocial changes, and susceptibility to treatment toxicities associated with advancing age. The elderly account for a large proportion of patients diagnosed with glioblastoma (GBM), and this population is projected to increase. Their prognosis is inferior to that of GBM patients as a whole, and concerns over treatment toxicity may limit the aggressiveness with which they are treated. Recent clinical studies have assisted with therapeutic decision making in this cohort. Hypofractionated radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide has been shown to increase survival without worsened quality of life in elderly patients with good functional status. Single modality radiation therapy or temozolomide therapy are frequently used in this population, and while neither has demonstrated superiority, O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status is predictive of improved survival with temozolomide over radiation therapy. Despite these advances, ambiguity as to how to best define, assess, and treat this population remains. The specific response of elderly patients to emerging therapies, such as immunotherapies, is unclear. Advancing outcomes for elderly patients with GBM requires persistent efforts to include them in translational and clinical research endeavors, and concurrent dedication to the preservation of function and quality of life in this population.

Is surgical resection useful in elderly newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients? Outcome evaluation and prognostic factors assessment

ASTRACT

BACKGROUND: The incidence of glioblastoma among elderly patients is constantly increasing. The value of radiation therapy and concurrent/adjuvant chemotherapy has been widely assessed. So far, the role of surgery has not been thoroughly investigated. The study aimed to evaluate safety and impact of several entities of surgical resection on outcome of elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated by a multimodal approach.

METHODS

Patients ≥ 65 years, underwent surgery were included. The extent of surgical resection (EOR) was defined as complete resection (CR = 100%), gross total resection (GTR = 90-99%), sub-total resection (STR = 78-90%), partial resection (PR = 30-78%), and biopsy. After surgery, all patients received adjuvant radiotherapy (60/2 Gy fraction) with concomitant/adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy.

RESULTS

From March 2004 to December 2015, 178 elderly with a median age of 71 years (range 65-83 years) were treated. CR was obtained in 8 (4.5%), GTR in 63 (35.4%), STR in 46 (25.8%), PR in 16 (9.0%), and biopsy in 45 (25.3%). RT was started in all patients, concurrent/adjuvant CHT in 149 (83.7%) and 132 (74.2%). The median follow-up time was 12.2 months (range 0.4-50.4 months). The median, 1- and 2-year progression-free survival was 8.9 months (95%CI 7.8-100 months), 32.0 ± 3.5%, and 12.9 ± 2.6%. The median, 1- and 2-year overall survival were 12.2 (95%CI 11.3-13.1 months), 51.1 ± 3.7%, and 16.3 ± 2.9%. Tumor location, extent of resection, and neurological status after surgery statistically affected survival (p ≪ 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Maximal surgical resection is safe and feasible in elderly patients with influence on survival. A preoperative evaluation has to be carried out.

Primary brain tumours in adults

Primary CNS tumours refer to a heterogeneous group of tumours arising from cells within the CNS, and can be benign or malignant. Malignant primary brain tumours remain among the most difficult cancers to treat, with a 5 year overall survival no greater than 35%. The most common malignant primary brain tumours in adults are gliomas. Recent advances in molecular biology have improved understanding of glioma pathogenesis, and several clinically significant genetic alterations have been described. A number of these (IDH, 1p/19q codeletion, H3 Lys27Met, and RELA-fusion) are now combined with histology in the revised 2016 WHO classification of CNS tumours. It is likely that understanding such molecular alterations will contribute to the diagnosis, grading, and treatment of brain tumours. This progress in genomics, along with significant advances in cancer and CNS immunology, has defined a new era in neuro-oncology and holds promise for diagntic and therapeutic improvement. The challenge at present is to translate these advances into effective treatments. Current efforts are focused on developing molecular targeted therapies, immunotherapies, gene therapies, and novel drug-delivery technologies. Results with single-agent therapies have been disappointing so far, and combination therapies seem to be required to achieve a broad and durable antitumour response. Biomarker-targeted clinical trials could improve efficiencies of therapeutic development.

Clinical application of 3.0 T intraoperative magnetic resonance combined with multimodal neuronavigation in resection of cerebral eloquent area glioma

Glioma is the most common tumor among central nervous system tumors; surgical intervention presents difficulties. This is especially the case for gliomas in so-called "eloquent areas," as surgical resection threatens vital structures adjacent to the tumor. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) combined with multimodal neuronavigation may prove beneficial during surgery. This study explored the applicability of 3.0 T high field iMRI combined with multimodal neuronavigation in the resection of gliomas in eloquent brain areas.We reviewed 40 patients with a glioma located in the eloquent brains areas who underwent treatment in the Neurosurgery Department of Peking University International Hospital between December 2015 and August 2017. The experimental group included 20 patients treated using iMRI assistance technology (iMRI group). The remaining 20 patients underwent treatment by conventional neuronavigation (non-iMRI group). Tumor resection degree, preoperative and postoperative ability of daily living scale (Barthel index), infection rate, and operative time were compared between the 2 groups.No difference in infection rate was observed between the 2 groups. However, compared with the non-iMRI group, the iMRI group had a higher resection rate (96.55 ± 4.03% vs 87.70 ± 10.98%, P = .002), postoperative Barthel index (90.75 ± 12.90 vs 9.25 ± 16.41, P = .018), as well as a longer operation time (355.85 ± 61.40 vs 302.45 ± 64.09, P = .011).The use of iMRI technology can achieve a relatively higher resection rate among cases of gliomas in eloquent brain areas, with less incidence of postoperative neurological deficits. Although the operative time using iMRI was longer than that taken to perform conventional navigation surgery, the surgical infection rate in these 2 procedures showed no significant difference.