Editorial: Ultra-early surgery for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

The efficacy of antifibrinolytic therapy in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim

The efficacy of antifibrinolytics in subarachnoid hemorrhage remains unclear due to conflicting evidence from studies.

Materials & methods

Online databases were queried to include randomized controlled trials and propensity matched observational studies. We used Review Manager for the statistical analysis, presenting results as odds ratios with 95% CI.

Results

The 12 shortlisted studies included 3359 patients, of which 1550 (46%) were in the intervention (tranexamic acid) group and 1809 (54%) in the control group. Antifibrinolytic therapy significantly reduced the risk of rebleeding (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.40-0.75; p = 0.0002) with no significant decrease in poor clinical outcome (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.86-1.20; p = 0.85) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.92; CI: 0.72-1.17; p = 0.50).

Conclusion

In patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, antifibrinolytics reduce the risk of rebleeding without significantly affecting mortality or clinical outcomes.

Propensity-adjusted analysis of ultra-early aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage treatment and patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

Optimal definitive treatment timing for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remains controversial. We compared outcomes for aSAH patients with ultra-early treatment versus later treatment at a single large center.

METHOD

Patients who received definitive open surgical or endovascular treatment for aSAH between January 1, 2014, and July 31, 2019, were included. Ultra-early treatment was defined as occurring within 24 h from aneurysm rupture. The primary outcome was poor neurologic outcome (modified Rankin Scale score > 2). Propensity adjustment was performed for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Hunt and Hess grade, Fisher grade, aneurysm treatment type, aneurysm type, size, and anterior location.

RESULTS

Of the 1013 patients (mean [SD] age, 56 [14] years; 702 [69%] women, 311 [31%] men) included, 94 (9%) had ultra-early treatment. Compared with the non-ultra-early cohort, the ultra-early treatment cohort had a significantly lower percentage of saccular aneurysms (53 of 94 [56%] vs 746 of 919 [81%], P <0 .001), greater frequency of open surgical treatment (72 of 94 [77%] vs 523 of 919 [57%], P <0 .001), and greater percentage of men (38 of 94 [40%] vs 273 of 919 [30%], P = .04). After adjustment, ultra-early treatment was not associated with neurologic outcome in those with at least 180-day follow-up (OR = 0.86), the occurrence of delayed cerebral ischemia (OR = 0.87), or length of stay (exp(β), 0.13) (P ≥ 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large, single-center cohort of aSAH patients, ultra-early treatment was not associated with better neurologic outcome, fewer cases of delayed cerebral ischemia, or shorter length of stay.

Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Tranexamic acid has been shown to reduce rebleeding after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage; however, whether it can reduce mortality and improve clinical outcomes is controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the tranexamic acid in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to March 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tranexamic acid and placebo in adults with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Handbook, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. This meta-analysis included 13 RCTs, involving 2,888 patients. In patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage tranexamic acid had no significant effect on all-cause mortality (RR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.84–1.10, p = 0.55, I² = 44%) or poor functional outcome (RR = 1.04; 95% CI = 0.95–1.15, p = 0.41) compared with the control group. However, risk of rebleeding was significantly lower (RR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.43–0.80, p = 0.0007, I² = 53%). There were no significant differences in other adverse events between tranexamic acid and control treatments, including cerebral ischemia (RR = 1.17; 95% CI = 0.95–1.46, p = 0.15, I² = 53%). At present, routine use of tranexamic acid after subarachnoid hemorrhage cannot be recommended. For a patient with subarachnoid hemorrhage, it is essential to obliterate the aneurysm as early as possible. Additional higher-quality studies are needed to further assess the effect of tranexamic acid on patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Higher Serum Levels of Lactate Dehydrogenase Before Microsurgery Predict Poor Outcome of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Introduction: We explored whether higher preoperative serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) predicted outcome 3 months after surgery in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) treated using microsurgical clipping in our institution.

Methods: Patients with aSAH treated at our institution between 2010 and 2018 were enrolled. The following parameters were recorded: age, sex, smoking and drinking history, medical history, Hunt–Hess and Fisher grades, aneurysm location, aneurysm size, surgical treatment, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), intracranial infection, hydrocephalus, pneumonia, and preoperative serum LDH levels within 24 h of aSAH. We investigated whether preoperative serum LDH levels were associated with Hunt–Hess grade, Fisher grade, and functional neurological outcome.

Results: In total, 2,054 patients with aSAH were enrolled, 874 of whom were treated using microsurgical clipping. The average serum LDH level (U/L) was significantly lower in the good outcome group (180.096 ± 50.237) than in the poor outcome group (227.554 ± 83.002; p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, the average serum LDH level (U/L) was still lower in the good outcome group (205.356 ± 76.785) than in the poor outcome group (227.119 ± 86.469; p = 0.029). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.702 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.650–0.754; p < 0.001). Based on the ROC curve, the optimal cutoff value for serum LDH levels as a predictor of poor 3-month outcome (modified Rankin Scale score > 2) was 201.5 U/L. The results revealed that Hunt–Hess grade, Fisher grade, DCI, pneumonia, and serum LDH (>201.5 U/L) were significantly associated with poor outcome. After propensity score matching, serum LDH levels > 201.5 U/L were still considered an independent risk factor for poor outcome (odds ratio: 2.426, 95% CI = 1.378–4.271, p = 0.002). Serum LDH levels were associated with Hunt–Hess and Fisher grades and were correlated with functional neurological outcomes (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our findings showed that higher preoperative serum levels of LDH correlated with Hunt–Hess grade, Fisher grade, and neurological functional outcome, and predicted the outcome of aSAH treated by microsurgical clipping at 3 months, which was involved in the related mechanisms of early brain injury and showed its potential clinical significance in patients with aSAH.

Ultra-early tranexamic acid after subarachnoid haemorrhage (ULTRA): a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage, short-term antifibrinolytic therapy with tranexamic acid has been shown to reduce the risk of rebleeding. However, whether this treatment improves clinical outcome is unclear. We investigated whether ultra-early, short-term treatment with tranexamic acid improves clinical outcome at 6 months.

METHODS

In this multicentre prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label trial with masked outcome assessment, adult patients with spontaneous CT-proven subarachnoid haemorrhage in eight treatment centres and 16 referring hospitals in the Netherlands were randomly assigned to treatment with tranexamic acid in addition to care as usual (tranexamic acid group) or care as usual only (control group). Tranexamic acid was started immediately after diagnosis in the presenting hospital (1 g bolus, followed by continuous infusion of 1 g every 8 h, terminated immediately before aneurysm treatment, or 24 h after start of the medication, whichever came first). The primary endpoint was clinical outcome at 6 months, assessed by the modified Rankin Scale, dichotomised into a good (0-3) or poor (4-6) clinical outcome. Both primary and safety analyses were according to intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02684812.

FINDINGS

Between July 24, 2013, and July 29, 2019, we enrolled 955 patients; 480 patients were randomly assigned to tranexamic acid and 475 patients to the control group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, good clinical outcome was observed in 287 (60%) of 475 patients in the tranexamic acid group, and 300 (64%) of 470 patients in the control group (treatment centre adjusted odds ratio 0·86, 95% CI 0·66-1·12). Rebleeding after randomisation and before aneurysm treatment occurred in 49 (10%) patients in the tranexamic acid and in 66 (14%) patients in the control group (odds ratio 0·71, 95% CI 0·48-1·04). Other serious adverse events were comparable between groups.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with CT-proven subarachnoid haemorrhage, presumably caused by a ruptured aneurysm, ultra-early, short-term tranexamic acid treatment did not improve clinical outcome at 6 months, as measured by the modified Rankin Scale.

FUNDING

Fonds NutsOhra.

Higher leukocyte count predicts 3-month poor outcome of ruptured cerebral aneurysms

It is not fully established whether leukocyte can predict the poor outcome for ruptured cerebral aneurysms (CA) or not. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 428 patients with ruptured CA between 2010 and 2015. Patients’ demographic data, including gender, age, history of smoking, alcohol, hypertension, diabetes and hypercholesterolemia, Hunt-Hess and Fisher grade, occurrence of hydrocephalus, aneurysm location, time to surgery, delayed ischemic neurological deficit (DIND) and peak leukocyte of blood test from day 1 to 3 after aneurysmal rupture were recorded and analyzed. In the multivariable analysis model, gender, Fisher grade, time to surgery and hydrocephalus were not relevant to poor outcome. However, Hunt-Hess grade, DIND and preoperative leukocyte count (>13.84 × 10⁹/L) were significantly associated with adverse outcome. The respective increased risks were 5.2- (OR 5.24, 95% CI 1.67–16.50, p = 0.005), 6.2-(OR 6.24, 95% CI 3.55–10.99, p < 0.001) and 10.9-fold (OR 10.93, 95% CI 5.98–19.97, p < 0.001). The study revealed that Hunt-Hess grade, DIND and preoperative leukocyte count (>13.84 × 10⁹/L) were independent risk factors for poor outcome of ruptured CA at 3 months. Higher leukocyte count is a convenient and useful marker to predict 3-month poor outcome for ruptured CA.

Ultra-Early Treatment for Poor-Grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

It remains unknown if ultra-early (within 24 hours after onset) treatment can improve the prognosis in patients with poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). We aimed to evaluate the effect of ultra-early treatment on functional outcomes and mortality in patients with poor-grade aSAH via a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We performed a literature search in the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases. Primary outcomes were death and functional outcome assessed at any time period. Secondary outcomes were the rebleeding rate before an aneurysm occlusion procedure and the incidence of intraoperative technique difficulty (ITD). The results are reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 14 articles containing 1111 patients met our inclusion criteria and were included in our analysis. The pooled incidence was 47% (95% CI, 40%-54%) for favorable outcome across 13 studies, 26% (95% CI, 19%-32%) for mortality in 11 studies, 10% (95% CI, 3%-16%) for rebleeding in 5 studies, and 20% (95% CI, 10%-31%) for ITD in 5 studies after ultra-early treatment of poor-grade aSAH. Compared with delayed treatment (>24 hours), the ultra-early treatment failed to improve outcomes (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.75-2.01; P = 0.40) or reduce mortality (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.58-1.22; P = 0.45), but tended to prevent preoperative rebleeding (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.32 to 1.07; P = 0.08) in 6, 4, and 4 case-control studies, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show no significant change both in functional outcome and mortality between ultra-early and delayed treatment although ultra-early treatment may be associated with lower rebleeding rate.

Predictors of Postoperative Cerebral Ischemia in Patients with Ruptured Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Cerebral ischemia is a major contributor to poor outcome after ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms (ACoAs), and is not well classified. In this article, we develop a classification and identify risk factors of cerebral ischemia after ruptured ACoAs.

METHODS

Three hundred sixty patients with ruptured ACoAs undergoing microsurgical clipping were collected. Sex, age, smoking status, Hunt-Hess grade, Fisher grade, hospital stay, surgical timing, hypertension, diabetes, postoperative cerebral ischemia, and postoperative modified Rankin Scale score were collected. Postoperative ischemic changes are classified according to a novel grade (ischemic grade I-IV).

RESULTS

Predictive factors of postoperative ischemia (grade I-IV) included sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.956; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.262-3.032; P = 0.003) and Fisher grade (OR, 1.813; 95% CI, 1.144-2.871; P = 0.011). Male sex had a tendency to develop postoperative cerebral ischemia (61.3% in the ischemia group vs. 45.7% in the nonischemia group), while surgical timing did not. However, in patients with postoperative ischemia, early surgery within 3 days (OR, 3.334; 95% CI, 1.411-7.879; P = 0.006) and advanced age greater than 55 years (OR, 2.783; 95% CI, 1.214-6.382; P = 0.016) were risk factors for postoperative neurologic deficits (grade III-IV).

CONCLUSIONS

Male sex and higher Fisher grade predict postoperative ischemia (grade I-IV), whereas surgical timing does not. However, in patients with postoperative cerebral ischemia, early surgery within 3 days and age greater than 55 years can increase the frequency of postoperative neurological deficits (grade III-IV). Older male patients undergoing early microsurgery had a tendency to develop neurologic deficits.