Use of liposomal bupivacaine in the postoperative management of posterior spinal decompression

Lack of concentration-dependent local toxicity of highly concentrated (5%) versus conventional 0.5% bupivacaine following musculoskeletal surgery in a rat model

PURPOSE

Various sustained-release formulations incorporate high bupivacaine concentrations but data on local toxicity is lacking. This study explores local toxic effects of highly concentrated (5%) bupivacaine compared to clinically used concentrations in vivo following skeletal surgery, to assess the safety of sustained-release formulations with high bupivacaine concentrations.

METHODS

Sixteen rats underwent surgery, in which screws with catheters affixed were implanted in the spine or femur in a factorial experimental design, allowing single-shot or continuous 72 h local administration of 0.5%, 2.5% or 5.0% bupivacaine hydrochloride. During the 30-day follow-up, animal weight was recorded and blood samples were obtained. Implantation sites underwent histopathological scoring for muscle damage, inflammation, necrosis, periosteal reaction/thickening and osteoblast activity. Effects of bupivacaine concentration, administration mode and implantation site on local toxicity scores were analyzed.

RESULTS

Chi-squared tests for score frequencies revealed a concentration-dependent decrease in osteoblast count. Moreover, spinal screw implantation led to significantly more muscle fibrosis but less bone damage than femoral screw implantation, reflecting the more invasive muscle dissection and shorter drilling times related to the spinal procedure. No differences between bupivacaine administration modes regarding histological scoring or body weight changes were observed. Weight increased, while CK levels and leukocyte counts decreased significantly during follow-up, reflecting postoperative recovery. No significant differences in weight, leukocyte count and CK were found between interventional groups.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study found limited concentration-dependent local tissue effects of bupivacaine solutions concentrated up to 5.0% following musculoskeletal surgery in the rat study population.

The Effects of Liposomal Bupivacaine on Long-term Outcomes and Decreasing Immediate Postoperative Opioid Use Following One-level and Two-level Posterior Lumbar Fusions

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine in postoperative analgesia and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing one-level and two-level posterior lumbar fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Multiple studies have investigated the use of liposomal bupivacaine in spine surgery with varying results. The potential benefits of its use include decreasing postoperative opioid use, improved pain control, and a shorter hospital stay. Several studies have supported its use in spine surgery with others showing minimal to no benefit. No studies have investigated its possible impact on long-term outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 42 patients (22 one-level, 20 two-level) received liposomal bupivacaine injection just before surgical closure and were compared with a historical control group of 42 patients (27 one-level, 15 two-level) that did not receive liposomal bupivacaine. Daily opioid consumption was collected and converted to oral morphine equivalents. Length of stay and daily average pain scores using the visual analog scale were also recorded. In addition, SF-36 bodily pain and physical function outcome measures were collected preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

The liposomal bupivacaine group was found to have a significantly lower total opioid consumption compared with the control group ( P =0.001). The liposomal bupivacaine group was also found to use significantly fewer opioids on the day of surgery compared with the control group ( P <0.0001). There was no significant difference shown in the average visual analog scale pain scores, length of stay, or long-term outcomes between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of liposomal bupivacaine in one-level and two-level posterior lumbar fusions shows promise as an adjuvant for postoperative analgesia by decreasing postoperative opioid consumption. With the varying results demonstrated with the utilization of liposomal bupivacaine in spine surgery, further investigation is warranted, namely a larger prospective randomized control study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Liposomal bupivacaine does not decrease postoperative opioid use or length of hospital stay in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

BACKGROUND

Despite its widespread use, definitive data demonstrating the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is limited especially in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Therefore, this investigation examined whether ACDF patients who received intra-operative LB (LB cohort) exhibited decreased post-operative opioid use and lengths of hospital stay (LOS) compared to ACDF patients who did not receive intra-operative LB (controls).

METHODS

Eighty-two patients who underwent primary ACDF by a single surgeon from 2016 to 2019 were identified from an institutional database. Fifty-nine patients received intra-operative LB while twenty-three did not. Patient characteristics, medical comorbidities, complications, post-operative opioid consumption, and LOS data were collected.

RESULTS

The LB cohort did not require fewer opioids on post-operative day (POD) 0, POD1, POD2, or throughout the hospital course after normalizing by LOS (total per LOS). The number of cervical vertebrae involved in surgery, but not LB use, predicted opioid consumption on POD0, POD1, and total per LOS. For every vertebral level involved, 242 additional morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were consumed on POD0, 266 additional MME were utilized on POD1, and 130 additional MME were consumed in total per LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

ACDF patients who received intra-operative LB did not require fewer post-operative opioids or exhibit a decreased LOS compared to controls. Patients whose procedures involved a greater number of cervical vertebrae were associated with greater opioid consumption on POD0, POD1, and total per LOS. ACDF patients, especially those who had a high number of vertebrae involved, may require alternative analgesia to LB.

Liposomal bupivacaine in posterior spine surgery: A piece of the puzzle for postoperative pain

Background

Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is a local analgesic that may be used at the time of surgery to limit postoperative pain around the surgical site. Its efficacy in decreasing pain, decreasing narcotic consumption, decreasing length of stay, and improving mobility is an area of intense research. The purpose of this study was to determine whether LB use was associated with improved patient-reported pain scores in the first 72 h following posterior spinal surgery, decreased postoperative narcotic need, and decreased length of stay.

Methods

One hundred and five patients undergoing elective posterior cervical or lumbar surgery were included in retrospective analysis. Forty-eight patients who received LB intraoperatively were compared with a historical cohort of 56 patients who underwent similar procedures and did not receive postsurgical infiltration with local analgesia. The same pain medication protocol was utilized postoperatively.

Results

Demographics, clinical characteristics, and total morphine milligram equivalents did not differ significantly between the groups. The treatment group averaged a decreased length of stay (1.85 days treatment, 2.68 days control, p = 0.057). Treatment with LB was associated with lower pain levels at 24 h (5.2 treatment, 6.4 control, p = 0.04) and 48-72 h (4.9 treatment, 6.6 control, p = 0.007) after surgery.

Conclusions

LB improved patient perception of pain in the acute postoperative time period.Intraoperative LB injection, coupled with focused early mobilization efforts and multimodal pain control, may lead to improved patient-reported outcomes, shorter length of stay, and decreased risk of perioperative complications.

Robust gelatin hydrogels for local sustained release of bupivacaine following spinal surgery

Adequate treatment of pain arising from spinal surgery is a major clinical challenge. Opioids are the mainstay of current treatment methods, but the frequency and severity of their side effects display a clear need for opioid-free analgesia. Local anesthetics have been encapsulated into sustained-release drug delivery systems to provide postoperative pain relief. However, these formulations are limited by rapid diffusion out of the surgical site. To overcome this limitation, we synthesized ring-shaped hydrogels incorporating bupivacaine, designed to be co-implanted with pedicle screws during spinal surgery. Hydrogels were prepared by riboflavin-mediated crosslinking of gelatin functionalized with tyramine moieties. Additionally, oxidized β-cyclodextrin was introduced into the hydrogel formulation to form dynamic bonds with tyramine functionalities, which enables self-healing behavior and resistance to shear. Feasibility of hydrogel implantation combined with pedicle screws was qualitatively assessed in cadaveric sheep as a model for instrumented spinal surgery. The in-situ crystallization of bupivacaine within the hydrogel matrix provided a moderate burst decrease and sustained release that exceeded 72 hours in vitro. The use of bupivacaine crystals decreased drug-induced cytotoxicity in vitro compared to bupivacaine HCl. Thus, the presented robust hydrogel formulation provides promising properties to enable the stationary release of non-opioid analgesics following spinal surgery. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Currently, postoperative pain following spinal surgery is mainly treated with opioids. However, the use of opioids is associated with several side effects including addiction. Here we developed robust and cytocompatible gelatin hydrogels, prepared via riboflavin-mediated photocrosslinking, that can withstand orthopedic implantation. The implantability was confirmed in cadaveric instrumented spinal surgery. Further, hydrogels were loaded with bupivacaine crystals to provide sustained release beyond 72 hours in vitro. The use of crystallized bupivacaine decreased cytotoxicity compared to bupivacaine HCl. The present formulation can aid in enabling opioid-free analgesia following instrumented spinal surgery.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Immediate-Release Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Control

BACKGROUND

Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is increasingly being used for postoperative pain control, but there are conflicting efficacy data when compared with immediate-release bupivacaine (IRB).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the comparative efficacies of LB and IRB for postoperative pain control in order to assess the formulary status of LB at our institution.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective, institutional review board-approved, noninferiority matched cohort study at a tertiary care academic medical center. Adult surgical patients admitted for >24 hours who received LB or IRB were included. The primary outcome was total opioid consumption within 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included total opioid consumption within 72 hours postoperatively, nonopioid analgesic use within 24 and 72 hours postoperatively, time to rescue analgesic use, and postoperative length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

A total of 326 patients were included in the matched cohort. Median 24-hour opioid consumption was significantly lower in the IRB group compared with the LB group (81 mg [30, 153] vs 103 mg [46, 241]; P = 0.01). Patients receiving IRB compared with LB also had a decrease in total opioid consumption 72 hours postoperatively (110 mg [45, 258] vs 165 mg [68, 402]; P = 0.005) and shorter postoperative LOS (2.8 days [1.7, 4] vs 3.3 days [2, 5.1]; P < 0.001). There was no difference in time to rescue analgesic use.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Across a variety of surgical procedures, administration of IRB compared with LB was associated with a reduction in total opioid consumption within 24 and 72 hours postoperatively and shorter LOS in adult surgical patients.

Efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine in spine surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spine surgery with posterior approaches may involve extensive manipulation of native structures, resulting in significant postoperative pain. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is an injectable analgesic that has demonstrated efficacy in decreasing postoperative pain and opioid requirements in patients across multiple surgical subspecialties.

PURPOSE

To consolidate and analyze the findings of retrospective cohort-matched studies and prospective randomized controlled trials investigating the use of LB in spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review.

STUDY SAMPLE

Retrospective cohort-matched studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of injected LB in spinal surgery compared with a control/no treatment group.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Cochrane controlled trials register, and Google Scholar were searched to identify all studies that examined the effect of LB use on outcomes in spine surgery. Our search identified 10 articles that independently evaluated the effect of LB on reduction of postoperative opioid use, pain scores, hospital length of stay, cost, and incidence of adverse effects. The principles of GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) were applied to assess the quality of evidence from each study.

RESULTS

Ten studies were analyzed (1,112 total patients). LB was associated with significantly lower millimolar morphine equivalents (MME) of postoperative opioids, especially in opiate-tolerant patients, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, area under the curve (AUC) of cumulative pain scores, numeric pain scale scores, and hospital length of stay (LOS), with comparable or lower odds of adverse effects relative to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-quality evidence suggests that liposomal bupivacaine may safely decrease postoperative opioid requirements, pain scores, and length of stay in patients undergoing spine surgery, whereas moderate-quality evidence does not support its use at this time. Therefore, additional standardized well-powered prospective studies are necessary to more clearly assess the efficacy of LB in spine surgery.

Does Local Administration of Liposomal Bupivacaine Reduce Pain and Narcotic Consumption in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if local administration of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) reduces postoperative pain scores and narcotic use in spinal deformity patients.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing elective spinal fusion (7 or more levels) for scoliosis or kyphosis were selected for inclusion. Patients received either periincisional injections of combined liposomal and standard bupivacaine (n = 90, group L) or standard bupivacaine only (n = 69, group C). Perioperative pain scores (VAS [visual analogue scale]), opioid use, length of stay, functional outcome (ODI [Oswestry Disability Index]), and perioperative complications were recorded. No external funding was received for this study.

RESULTS

A total of 159 patients met inclusion criteria (mean age was 54.2 years of age). No significant baseline demographic differences were noted between the 2 groups. Group L experienced slight improvements in pain control on postoperative day (POD) 1 (P = .02). No difference in pain scores were otherwise noted. Group L transitioned off of intravenous (IV) narcotics faster with 52.6% less IV use by POD3 (P = .03). No differences in total narcotic consumption, perioperative complications, lengths of stay, and functional outcome scores were otherwise noted between the 2 cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of LB in adult spinal deformity surgery does not appear to provide clinically important improvements in postoperative pain at the manufacturer's recommended dosage. Furthermore, while patients receiving LB may transition more quickly off of IV narcotics, this does not appear to translate into an overall decrease in narcotic consumption, hasten return of bowel function, or decrease hospital lengths of stay. Future prospective randomized control trials are warranted. The use of varying dosages of LB may also help further clarify the true efficacy of LB in the setting of spinal deformity surgery.

Effect of Liposomal Bupivacaine on Postoperative Opioid Requirements for Total Hip Arthroplasty, Total Knee Arthroplasty, Laminectomy, Hysterectomy, and Abdominoplasty Procedures

Purpose: Opioid use postoperatively has been linked to adverse events and an increase in opioid dependency. This retrospective study evaluated the effect of using liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for postoperative pain control on total opioid consumption, pain control, serious opioid-related adverse events (ORAEs), and hospital length of stay (LOS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), laminectomy, hysterectomy, and abdominoplasty procedures when compared with a control group. Methods: Patients receiving LB from August 1, 2017, to February 1, 2018, for the aforementioned procedures were included for evaluation, and patients undergoing similar procedures who did not receive LB served as the control group. The principal outcome was opioid consumption through postoperative day 5 or discharge, whichever came first, assessed by morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Secondary outcomes included pain scores within 72 hours postoperation, hospital LOS, and serious ORAEs. Results: A total of 323 patients were identified for inclusion in the study: TKA, n = 144; THA, n = 48; laminectomy, n = 73; hysterectomy, n = 30; and abdominoplasty, n = 28. Liposomal bupivacaine use was associated with reduced postoperative opioid consumption compared with alternative therapies with a median 71 MME (25%-75%; interquartile range [IQR] = 32.5-148.5) versus 102 MME (25%-75%; IQR = 57-165), P < .005. However, higher numeric pain scores were reported in the LB group compared with the control group for postoperative day 0 with a median of 5.5 (25%-75%; IQR = 4.5-7.4) versus 5.5 (25%-75%; IQR = 4-7) in the control group ( P < .001) and on postoperative day 1 with a median of 6 (25%-75%; IQR = 4.5-7) versus 5.5 (25%-75%; IQR = 4.3-7), P < .001. There was no difference in hospital LOS or ORAEs. Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis of pain management after TKA, THA, laminectomy, hysterectomy, and abdominoplasty procedures, patients receiving LB consumed significantly less opioid medications. However, this was not associated with clinically meaningful improvements in pain scores, hospital LOS, or serious ORAEs.

Perioperative and Anesthetic Considerations for Patients with Degenerative Spine Disease

The demand for spine surgery has dramatically increased over the last 2 decades. As the population ages and surgical and anesthetic techniques advance, the perioperative care of spine surgery patients poses challenges to anesthesiologists. Perioperative outcomes in terms of a decrease in complication rates and total health care expenditures have directed perioperative care to focus on enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, which many institutions have adopted. The role of anesthesiologists in the care of patients undergoing spine surgery is expanding beyond intraoperative care; consequently, a multidisciplinary approach is the best direction for optimal patient care.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Is Both Safe and Effective in Controlling Postoperative Pain After Spinal Surgery in Children: A Controlled Cohort Study

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective comparative cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate: (1) pain relief efficacy; (2) opioid consumption; (3) length of stay (LOS); (4) discharge disposition (DD); and (5) safety and adverse effects of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) in pediatric patients who underwent spinal deformity correction.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

LB is a long-acting, locally injectable anesthetic. Previous orthopedic studies investigating its use have been limited to adult patients. The use of LB as part of postoperative pain management in pediatric patients undergoing spine deformity correction surgery is yet to be evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 195 patients that received LB as part of their postoperative pain management regimen were compared with 128 patients who received standard pain management without LB. Pain intensity, opioid consumption, LOS, and DD were recorded. Potential LB-related complications were reported as frequencies and statistically compared for superiority. Noninferiority tests were performed using the Farrington-Manning score test. Multivariate tests based on generalized estimating equations were performed to determine the common and average treatment effects. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

The LB cohort demonstrated lower pain scores [postoperative day 1 (POD 1)-median=2, interquartile range (IQR)=(0-5) vs. 5 (2.5-7); POD 2-3 (0-5) vs. 4 (3-6); P<0.001], lower overall opioid consumption (78.2 vs. 129 morphine milligram equivalents; P=0.0001) and consistently from POD 0 to 3 (mean differences; 7.47, 9.04, 17.2, and 17.3 morphine milligram equivalents, respectively; P<0.01), shorter LOS (median=3 d, IQR=3-4 vs. 4 d, IQR=4-6; P<0.001), and similar to-home DD (98% vs. 97%). Complications were similar among the cohorts in superiority and 10% noninferiority analyses. Patients in the LB cohort had lower odds for complications (odds ratio=0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.93; P=0.009 and 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.90; P=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of LB when added to the current multimodal postoperative pain management regimens after pediatric spinal surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Intramuscular Liposomal Bupivacaine Decreases Length of Stay and Opioid Usage Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort review.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Historically, posterior spinal fusion has been recognized as a particularly painful surgery. Postoperative pain limits early patient mobilization and discharge, and negatively impacts patient satisfaction. Local infiltration of anesthetic agents combined with postoperative multimodal pain management is common. On the basis of existing data, the liposomal formulation of bupivacaine might play a role in promoting faster recovery during the immediate postoperative period. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential impact of LB on postoperative opioid requirements, ambulation, and duration of hospital stay, as well as potential health care cost savings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A historical cohort of adult lumbar spinal fusion patients was retrospectively evaluated, in which 105 patients received nonliposomal anesthetic and 105 received LB. Both groups were managed with a standardized postoperative analgesia regimen. Demographic information, opioid consumption, length of stay, distance ambulated, and total cost of inpatient stay were collected.

RESULTS

Although there was no difference in the pain scores between the 2 groups, the LB group was associated with significantly lower opioid usage throughout the postoperative period. More patients in the LB group were discharged within 2 days of surgery compared with the control group (88.6% vs. 38.1%, P<0.05). The control group was able to walk for a longer median distances (175 vs. 150 ft, P=0.02) on the first attempt, however, a significantly larger proportion of the LB group walked within the first 12 hours after surgery (61% vs. 3%, P<0.001). Also, LB usage was associated with $218 higher pharmacological cost compared with the control group but an overall $3035 lower cost for the entire hospitalization (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive usage of LB with lumbar fusion surgeries promotes earlier mobility, lower opioid consumption, and shorter length of stay resulting in overall lower health care cost.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Unintentional Epidural Anesthesia Mimicking Cauda Equina Syndrome from Suprafascial Injection of Liposomal Bupivacaine After Lumbar Foraminotomy: A Case Report

CASE

This case report describes a 46-year-old woman undergoing right-sided L5 to S1 decompression who received liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for postoperative analgesia and developed unintentional epidural anesthesia with symptoms mimicking cauda equina syndrome. The patient's symptoms resolved 72 hours postoperatively, approximately the length that LB typically lasts. At the 16-month follow-up, the patient demonstrated complete neurological function with no lower extremity strength or sensation deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

Tracking of LB into the epidural space after lumbar surgery may cause transient epidural anesthesia with symptoms that mimic cauda equina syndrome.

Opioid Alternatives in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review

Adequate analgesia is known to improve outcomes after spine surgery. Despite recent attention highlighting the negative effects of narcotics and their addiction potential, opioids have been the mainstay of management for providing analgesia following spine surgeries. However, side effects including hyperalgesia, tolerance, and subsequent dependence restrict the generous usage of opioids. Multimodal analgesia regimens acting through different mechanisms offer significant opioid sparing and minimize the side effects of individual drugs. Hence, they are being increasingly incorporated into enhanced recovery protocols. Multimodal analgesia includes drugs such as N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and membrane-stabilizing agents, neuraxial opioids, local anesthetic infiltration, and fascial compartment blocks. Analgesia started before the painful stimulus, termed preemptive analgesia, facilitates subsequent pain management. Both nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and neuraxial analgesia have been conclusively shown to reduce opioid requirements after spine surgery, and there is a resurgence of interest in the use of low-dose ketamine or methadone. Neuraxial narcotics offer enhanced analgesia for a longer duration with lower dosage and side effect profiles compared with systemic opioid administration. Fascial compartment blocks are increasingly used as they provide effective analgesia with fewer adverse effects. In this narrative review, we will discuss multimodality analgesic regimens incorporating opioid-sparing adjuvants to manage pain after spine surgery.

Retrospective Assessment of the Use of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Lumbar Fusions in Immediate Postoperative Hospital Care

BACKGROUND

Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for administration into surgical sites for postsurgical analgesia. The liposomal formulation allows for sustained effects up to 72 hours.

METHODS

A retrospective study assessed patients undergoing lumbar interbody surgery. Visual analog scale pain scores and amount of opioids consumed were recorded at 12-hour intervals for 72 hours postoperatively, as were patterns of discharge and hospital length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients (97 LB vs. 25 control group) were reviewed. Median LOS was shorter in the LB cohort compared with controls (1.94 vs. 3.08 days, respectively; P = 0.0043). When assessing the percentage of discharges between groups at 12-hour intervals, there were significantly more discharges in the LB cohort at 36-48 hours (P = 0.0226), and no differences elsewhere. There was a decrease in intravenous opioids consumed at 48-60 hours in the LB cohort compared with controls (P = 0.0494), a difference not detected at other time points or with oral or total opioids. Mean visual analog scale scores were significantly higher in the LB cohort compared with controls at 0-12 hours (5.2 vs. 3.9, respectively; P = 0.0079), but insignificantly different subsequently up to 72 hours. The LB cohort and controls were not significantly different in total amount of opioids consumed, overall pain scores, or regarding how the opioid amount consumed or pain scores changed over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of LB in lumbar interbody fusion decreases patients' LOS but has little effect on reducing overall pain scores or opioid use in the 72-hour postoperative hospital period.

Anesthetic management of complex spine surgery in adult patients: a review based on outcome evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to review the evidence regarding the anesthetic management of blood loss, pain control, and position-related complications of adult patients undergoing complex spine procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most recent evidence of the anesthetic management of complex spine surgery was identified with a systematic search and graded. In our review, prophylactic tranexamic acid and optimal prone positioning were shown to be effective blood conservation strategies with minimal risks to the patients. Cell saver was cost-effective in complex surgeries with expected blood loss of greater than 500 ml. As for pain control, most interventions only produced mild analgesic effects, suggesting a multimodal approach is necessary to achieve optimal pain control after spine surgery. Regional techniques and NSAIDs were effective but because of their risks, their usage should be discussed with the surgical team. Further studies are required to assess the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and risks associated with combined uses of different analgesic interventions. On the basis of the available evidence, we recommend a combined use of gabapentinoids, ketamine, and opioids to achieve optimal analgesia. Lastly, literature for position-related injuries is heavily relied on case reports and the Anesthesia Closed Claim Study because of their rarity. Therefore, we advocate for a structured team-based approach with checklists to minimize position-related complications.

SUMMARY

As the number and complexity of spine procedures are being performed worldwide is increasing, we suggested to bundle the aforementioned effective interventions as part of an ERAS spine protocol to improve the patient outcome of spine surgery.

Surgical Versus Endovascular Management of Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Emergent Issues and Future Directions

Ideal management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) and ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) is a controversial issue. Over the last few decades, a significant paradigm shift has occurred away from open microsurgical clipping toward endovascular coil embolization. Multiple studies have been performed with mixed results. Some studies suggest that endovascular treatment produces better clinical and functional outcomes, but is associated with increased need for retreatment. Other studies report increased durability in aneurysms treated with microsurgical clipping, but that clipping may be associated with worse functional outcomes in some cases. Further complicating the dialogue are variable costs associated with different treatment modalities, including country-dependent cost differences. Here we provide a review of some of the major studies comparing open surgery versus endovascular treatment for both RIAs and UIAs to distill their key findings and corresponding implications for clinical practice. We relate these research results to our institution's experience with RIAs and UIAs and describe our approach to treatment of these conditions. Finally, we discuss implications of the paradigm shift for both open and endovascular surgery, including educational initiatives directed toward preserving important microsurgical tenets in the setting of diminishing surgical volume.

Multimodal Analgesia for Perioperative Management of Patients presenting for Spinal Surgery

Multimodal, non-opioid based analgesia has become the cornerstone of ERAS protocols for effective analgesia after spinal surgery. Opioid side effects, dependence and legislation restricting long term opioid use has led to a resurgence in interest in opioid sparing techniques. The increasing array of multimodal opioid sparing analgesics available for spinal surgery targeting novel receptors, transmitters, and altering epigenetics can help provide an optimal perioperative experience with less opioid side effects and long-term dependence. Epigenetic mechanisms of pain may enhance or suppress gene expression, without altering the genome itself. Such mechanisms are complex, dynamic and responsive to environment. Alterations that occur can affect the pathophysiology of pain management at a DNA level, modifying perceived pain relief. In this review, we provide a brief overview of epigenetics of pain, systemic local anesthetics and neuraxial techniques that continue to remain useful for spinal surgery, neuropathic agents, as well as other common and less common target receptors for a truly multimodal approach to perioperative pain management.

Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN

Single-blinded prospective randomized control trial.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and hospital length of stay between patients who received liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus a single saline injection, following posterior lumbar decompression and fusion surgery for degenerative spondylosis.

METHODS

From 2015 to 2016, 59 patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression and fusion surgery were prospectively enrolled and randomized to receive either 60 mL injection of 266 mg LB or 60 mL of 0.9% sterile saline, intraoperatively. Outcome measures included the incidence of postoperative AEs and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

The most common AEs in the treatment group were nausea (39.3%), emesis (18.1%), and hypotension (18.1%). Nausea (23%), constipation (19.2%), and urinary retention (15.3%) were most common in the control group. Patients who received LB had an increased risk of developing nausea (relative risk [RR] = 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-3.8), emesis (RR = 2.3; 95% CI = 0.51-10.7), and headaches (RR = 2.36; 95% CI = 0.26-21.4). Patients receiving LB had a decreased risk of developing constipation (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.25-2.43), urinary retention (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.21-2.85), and pruritus (RR = 0.78; 95% = 0.21-2.8) postoperatively. Relative risk values mentioned above failed to reach statistical significance. No significant difference in the hospital length of stay between both groups was found (3.9 vs 3.9 days; P = .92).

CONCLUSION

Single-dose injections of LB to the surgical site prior to wound closure did not significantly increase or decrease the incidence or risk of developing AEs postoperatively. Furthermore, no significant difference was found in the hospital length of stay between both groups.

Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery program at a large cancer center: a preliminary analysis

This study describes the implementation of a multimodal, multidisciplinary, evidence-based ERAS program in oncologic spine surgery, identifies and measures several relevant postoperative recovery outcomes, and demonstrates the feasibility and potential benefit of the program in improving analgesia and decreasing opioid consumption. The study underscores the importance of defining and capturing meaningful, patient-specific, and patient-reported outcomes, and constant evaluation and monitoring of a group's compliance with the program. The study represents the steppingstone for evaluation and improvement of a young ERAS program for spine surgery and serves as a roadmap for further initiatives and larger-scale studies.

Intercostal Nerve Blockade with Exparel® Results in Lower Opioid Usage during the First 24 Hours after Video-Assisted Thorascopic Surgery

Liposomal bupivacaine (LipoB) provides prolonged local anesthetic effects and has seen usage in several fields of surgery. We review our experience using LipoB intraoperatively for intercostal nerve blocks after video-assisted throacoscopic surgery (VATS). A retrospective, single-center review was conducted for patients undergoing VATS from August 2012 to December 2014. Patients those who received LipoB as an intercostal nerve block were compared with patients who received blocks with standard bupivacaine. Opiate amounts used within the first six hours and then subsequent 18,48, and 72 hours were converted into morphine equivalents for comparison. Forty-seven patients met inclusion criteria: 21 receiving LipoB intercostal nerve block and 26 controls. Groups were similar for age, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores. The LipoB group had a larger portion of males (P < 0.02). Postoperatively, morphine equivalent usage was significantly less in the LipoB group compared with the standard bupivacaine within the first six hours after surgery (15.62 vs 52.41, P = 0.001) and in the subsequent 18 hours (28.98 vs 65.17, P = 0.01). After the first 24 hours there was not a significant difference in opiate usage between the two groups. There was no difference in length of stay between the two groups. In our study group of VATS patients, an intercostal nerve block with LipoB significantly reduced the usage of postoperative opioids in the first 24 hours only when compared with standard bupivacaine.

The Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Lumbar Spine Surgery

Background

Postoperative pain management in spine surgery holds unique challenges. The purpose of this study is to determine if the local anesthetic liposomal bupivacaine (LB) reduces the total opioid requirement in the first 3 days following posterior lumbar decompression and fusion (PLDF) surgery for degenerative spondylosis.

Methods

Fifty patients underwent PLDF surgery in a prospective randomized control pilot trial between August 2015 and October 2016 and were equally allocated to either a treatment (LB) or a control (saline) group. Assessments included the 72-hour postoperative opioid requirement normalized to 1 morphine milligram equivalent (MME), visual analog scale (VAS), and hospital length of stay.

Results

LB did not significantly alter the 72-hour postoperative opioid requirement compared to saline (11.6 vs. 13.4 MME, P = .40). In a subgroup analysis, there was also no significant difference in opioid consumption among narcotic-naive patients with either LB or saline. Among narcotic tolerant patients, however, opioid consumption was higher with saline than LB (20.6 MME vs. 13.3 MME, P = .048). Additionally, pre- and postoperative VAS scores and hospital length of stay were not significantly different with either LB or saline.

Conclusions

In the setting of PLDF surgery, LB injections did not significantly reduce the consumption of opioids in the first 3 postoperative days, nor did the hospital length of stay or VAS pain scores, compared to saline. However, LB could be beneficial in reducing the consumption of opioids in narcotic-tolerant populations.

Level of Evidence

2.

Does Subcutaneous Infiltration of Liposomal Bupivacaine Following Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Improve Immediate Postoperative Pain Control?

Study Design

Retrospective case-control study using prospectively collected data.

Purpose

Evaluate the impact of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) on postoperative pain management and narcotic use following standardized single-level low lumbar transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

Overview of Literature

Poor pain control after surgery has been linked with decreased pain satisfaction and increased economic burden. Unfortunately, opioids have many limitations and side effects despite being the primary treatment of postoperative pain. LB may be a form of pre-emptive analgesia used to reduce the use of postoperative narcotics as evidence in other studies evaluating its use in single-level microdiskectomies.

Methods

The infiltration of LB subcutaneously during wound closure was performed by a single surgeon beginning in July 2014 for all single-level lumbar TLIF spinal surgeries at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center. This cohort was compared against a control cohort of patients who underwent the same surgery by the same surgeon in the preceding 6 months. Statistical analysis was performed on relevant variables including: morphine equivalents of narcotic medication used (primary outcome), length of hospitalization, Visual Analog Scale pain scores, and total time spent on a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump.

Results

A total of 30 patients were included in this study; 16 were in the intervention cohort and 14 were in the control cohort. The morphine equivalents of intravenous narcotic use postoperatively were significantly less in the LB cohort from day of surgery to postoperative day 3. Although the differences lost their statistical significance, the trend remained for total (oral and intravenous) narcotic consumption to be lower in the LB group. The patients who received the study intervention required an acute pain service consult less frequently (62.5% in LB cohort vs. 78.6% in control cohort). The amount of time spent on a PCA pump in the LB group was 31 hours versus 47 hours in the control group (p=0.1506).

Conclusions

Local infiltration of LB postoperatively to the subcutaneous tissues during closure following TLIF significantly decreased the amount of intravenous narcotic medication required by patients. Well-powered prospective studies are still needed to determine optimal dosing and confirm benefits of LB on total narcotic consumption and other measures of pain control following major spinal surgery.

Intraoperative Infiltration of Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Bupivacaine Hydrochloride for Pain Management in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Pain management after total hip arthroplasty is well studied. Nevertheless, there is no consensus regarding the "cocktail" to use in periarticular infiltration (PAI). Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is a slow release local anesthetic that can be infiltrated during surgery. In this study, we compared LB to bupivacaine hydrochloride (HCL).

METHODS

Between September 2014 and March 2016, 181 patients were screened for this prospective randomized trial. A total of 107 patients were enrolled and studied. Patients were separated into LB and control groups. LB group (50) received PAI with LB and bupivacaine HCL with epinephrine and the control group (57) received PAI with bupivacaine HCL and epinephrine. Patient morphine equivalent consumption, pain score estimated on visual analog scale, time to first ambulation greater than 20 feet, time to discharge, drug-related side effects, and patient falls were documented. Data were collected up to 72 hours postoperation.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in morphine equivalent consumption in any of the 12-hour time blocks, up to 72 hours. No patient falls were documented in either group. Time to first ambulation greater than 20 feet, ambulation same day as surgery, time to discharge, and drug-related side effects were not significantly different between groups.

CONLCUSION

Intraoperative PAI with LB did not result in significant differences in postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores, opioid-related side effects, time to first ambulation, and length of stay up to 72 hours following total hip arthroplasty compared to a control group.

Comparison of the Effects of Sufentanil and Fentanyl Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia after Lumbar Fusion

Objective

Postoperative pain is one of the major complaints of patients after lumbar fusion surgery. The authors evaluated the effects of intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) using fentanyl or sufentanil on postoperative pain management and pain-related complications.

Methods

Forty-two patients that had undergone surgery with lumbar instrumentation and fusion at single or double levels constituted the study cohort. Patients were equally and randomly allocated to a sufentanil group (group S) or a fentanyl group (group F) for patient controlled analgesia (PCA). Group S received sufentanil at a dose of 4 μg/kg IV-PCA and group F received fentanyl 24 μg/kg IV-PCA. A numeric rating scale (NRS) of postoperative pain was applied before surgery, and immediately and at 1, 6, and 24 hours (hrs) after surgery. Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were obtained before surgery and one month after surgery. Opioid-related side effects were also evaluated.

Results

No significant intergroup difference was observed in NRS or ODI scores at any of the above-mentioned time points. Side effects were more frequent in group F. More specifically, nausea, vomiting rates were significantly higher (p=0.04), but pruritus, hypotension, and headache rates were non-significantly different in the two groups.

Conclusion

Sufentanil displayed no analgesic advantage over fentanyl postoperatively. However, sufentanil should be considerable for patients at high risk of GI issues, because it had lower postoperative nausea and vomiting rates than fentanyl.