Quality of survival the 1st year with glioblastoma: a longitudinal study of patient-reported quality of life

Postsurgical motor function and processing speed as predictors of quality of life in patients with chronic-phase glioblastoma

PURPOSE

Patients with glioblastomas (GBMs) have poor prognosis despite various treatments; therefore, attention should be paid to maintaining the quality of survival. Neurocognitive deficits can affect the quality of life (QOL) in patients with GBM. Most studies concerning QOL and neurocognitive functions have demonstrated a relationship between QOL and self-reported neurocognitive decline, although this method does not accurately reflect damaged functional domains. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the neurocognitive functions that influence the QOL in patients with GBMs using an objective assessment of neurocognitive functions.

METHODS

Data from 40 patients newly diagnosed with GBMs were analyzed. All patients completed the assessment of QOL and various neurological and neurocognitive functions including general cognitive function, processing speed, attention, memory, emotion recognition, social cognition, visuospatial cognition, verbal fluency, language, motor function, sensation, and visual field at 6 months postoperatively. QOL was assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). In the SF-36, the physical, mental, and role and social component summary (PCS, MCS, and RCS, respectively) scores were calculated. Multiple logistic regression analyses and chi-square tests were used to evaluate the association between SF-36 scores and neurocognitive functions.

RESULTS

The MCS was maintained, while the PCS and RCS scores were significantly lower in patients with GBMs than in healthy controls (p = 0.0040 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Among several neurocognitive functions, motor function and processing speed were significantly correlated with PCS and RCS scores, respectively (p = 0.0048 and p = 0.030, respectively). Patients who maintained their RCS or PCS scores had a higher probability of preserving motor function or processing speed than those with low RCS or PCS scores (p = 0.0026).

CONCLUSIONS

Motor function and processing speed may be predictors of QOL in patients with GBMs.

Living with glioblastoma - the need for integrated support based on experiences of chaos, loss of autonomy, and isolation in both patients and their relatives

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the experiences of living with glioblastoma from the perspective of patients themselves as well as their closest relatives, focusing on the changes in the life situation and the need for support.

METHODS

Twenty-two semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 patients (mean age 61 years, 7 male, 5 female) and 10 relatives (mean age 56 years, 3 male, 7 female). The relatives comprised of partners (n = 7), child (n = 1), sister (n = 1), or friend (n = 1). Questions focused on changes in the life situation and support needed to face these changes. Data was analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis (QCA).

RESULTS

Living with glioblastoma dramatically changes the lives of both patients and relatives. Cognitive symptoms (e.g., speech and memory disturbances), deterioration of physical function (e.g., paresis), and psychological function (e.g., behavioral changes, anxiety) can lead to impaired family dynamics, social isolation, and fear of the future. Support from other family members, friends, and healthcare professionals is crucial. Timely, tangible, and easily available support from the healthcare system the entire disease trajectory is sought after, enabling individualized care with emotional support, clearer information, and faster feedback.

CONCLUSION

The changes in life situations faced by patients with glioblastoma and their closest relatives are dramatic and underline the importance of providing integrated care throughout the entire healthcare continuum, encompassing specialist neuro-oncological care, municipal support, and palliative care. Individualized support for both patients and relatives can enhance the sense of safety amid the chaos in their life situation.

Surgical site infections after glioblastoma surgery: boon or bane?

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most common postoperative complications. Glioblastoma multiforme is the most frequent malignant brain tumor with a dismal prognosis despite combined treatment. The effect of SSIs on the course of glioblastoma patients has not been fully clarified since available data are limited and partially contradictory. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of SSIs on the course of patients with glioblastoma.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients undergoing surgery for glioblastoma between 2010 and 2020 in our institution were scanned and those with surgical site infections after glioblastoma resection were identified and compared to an age-matched control group. Overall survival and progression-free survival were the primary endpoints followed by the number of hospitalizations and the length of stay in hospital.

RESULTS

Out of 305 patients undergoing surgery for glioblastoma, 38 patients with postoperative surgical site infection after resection were identified and 15 (5 men and 10 women aged between 9 and 72) were included in this study. 23 patients were excluded. The control group consisted of 30 age-matched patients without SSI (18 men and 12 women). There were no significant differences in median overall survival. Progression-free survival was higher in the SSI group. The number of hospitalizations and the length of stay were significantly higher in the SSI group.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that SSIs might reduce early recurrences without affecting overall survival. Furthermore, they might decrease health-related quality of life by doubling the total length of hospital stay.

Identification of health-related quality of life profiles among long-term survivors of primary central nervous system tumors

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify health-related quality of life (HRQOL) latent classes among primary central nervous system tumor (PCNST) long-term survivors (LTS) and to evaluate differences between classes in survivor sociodemographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, and symptoms to guide  the development of survivorship care programs tailored to unique class needs.

METHODS

Data from 298 PCNST LTS reporting HRQOL on the EQ-5D-3L were analyzed using latent profile analysis. Correlations and independent group t-tests were performed to identify differences between identified HRQOL classes by sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, and symptoms.

RESULTS

Sample mean age was 48 years, 54% were male, 82% Caucasian, 56% employed, 60% had a high-grade glioma, and 52% had a KPS ≥ 90. Two HRQOL classes, good (61%) and poor (39%), were identified. The good HRQOL class reported no problems with self-care and few problems with mobility or usual activities. Thirty-eight percent reported anxiety and depression and 21% pain. Over 94% of the poor HRQOL class had at least moderate problems with mobility and usual activities, and over 50% had pain, self-care issues, anxiety, and depression. Older age (φ = 0.21), unemployment (φ = 0.30), spine tumors (φ = 0.18), active treatment (φ = 0.20), tumor recurrence (φ = 0.28), and poorer KPS scores (φ = 0.61) were associated with membership in the poor HRQOL class.

CONCLUSIONS

In the poor PCNST LTS HRQOL class, an overwhelming majority faced significant physical challenges, and the good HRQOL class experienced mood-related disturbance but limited physical challenges. These HRQOL profiles can be used to guide survivorship programs and tailored interventions.

Supramaximal resection based on en-bloc technique reduces tumor burden and prolongs survival in primary supratentorial lobar glioblastoma

PURPOSE

Resection beyond the contrast-enhanced zone contributed to reduce tumor burden and prolong survival in glioblastomas. The optimal extent of resection (EOR) and how to achieve it are worthy of continuous investigation for obtaining a satisfactory balance between maximal resection and the preservation of neurological function.

METHODS

A total of 340 adult supratentorial lobar glioblastomas (included astrocytoma, WHO 4, IDH mutation and glioblastoma) were retrospectively evaluated. The clinical data, EOR, technique of resection, postoperative complications, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by univariate, multivariate and propensity score matched analysis. Histological staining was performed to comprehend the effect of the membranous structures and the cell distribution in tumoral and peritumoral regions.

RESULTS

Supramaximal resection (SMR) was confirmed as resection with 100% EORCE and > 50% EORnCE in glioblastomas by Cox proportional hazards model. Histological results showed SMR reduced the cell density of surgical edge compared to total resection. En-bloc technique based on membranous structures, which had blocking effect on tumoral invasion, contributed to achieve SMR. Moreover, applying en-bloc technique and achieving SMR did not additionally deteriorate neurological function and had similarly effects on the improvement of neurological function. Multivariate analysis confirmed that IDH1 status, technique of resection and EOR were independently correlated with PFS, and > 64 years old, IDH1 status, technique of resection, EOR and preoperative NIHSS were independently correlated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying en-bloc technique and achieving SMR, which could reduce tumor burden and did not increase additional complications, both had remarkedly positive effects on clinical outcomes in patients with primary supratentorial lobar glioblastomas.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Supramarginal Resection versus Gross Total Resection in Glioblastoma: Can We Enhance Progression-Free Survival Time and Preserve Postoperative Safety?

To date, gross total resection (GTR) of the contrast-enhancing area of glioblastoma (GB) is the benchmark treatment regarding surgical therapy. However, GB infiltrates beyond those margins, and most tumors recur in close proximity to the initial resection margin. It is unclear whether a supramarginal resection (SMR) enhances progression-free survival (PFS) time without increasing the incidence of postoperative surgical complications. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to investigate SMR with regard to PFS and postoperative surgical complications. We searched for eligible studies comparing SMR techniques with conventional GTR in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Medline databases. From 3158 initially identified records, 11 articles met the criteria and were included in our meta-analysis. Our results illustrate significantly prolonged PFS time in SMR compared with GTR (HR: 11.16; 95% CI: 3.07–40.52, p = 0.0002). The median PFS of the SMR arm was 8.44 months (95% CI: 5.18–11.70, p < 0.00001) longer than the GTR arm. The rate of postoperative surgical complications (meningitis, intracranial hemorrhage, and CSF leaks) did not differ between the SMR group and the GTR group. SMR resulted in longer median progression-free survival without a negative postoperative surgical risk profile. Multicentric prospective randomized trials with a standardized definition of SMR and analysis of neurologic functioning and health-related quality of life are justified and needed to improve the level of evidence.

Effect of Disulfiram and Copper Plus Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Alone on Survival in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Disulfiram has demonstrated broad antitumoral effect in several preclinical studies. One of the proposed indications is for the treatment of glioblastoma.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of disulfiram and copper as add-on to alkylating chemotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II/III clinical trial with parallel group design. Patients were recruited at 7 study sites in Sweden and 2 sites in Norway between January 2017 and November 2020. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had a first recurrence of glioblastoma, and indication for treatment with alkylating chemotherapy. Patients were followed up until death or a maximum of 24 months. The date of final follow-up was January 15, 2021. Data analysis was performed from February to September 2022.

Interventions

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either standard-of-care (SOC) alkylating chemotherapy alone, or SOC with the addition of disulfiram (400 mg daily) and copper (2.5 mg daily).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was survival at 6 months. Secondary end points included overall survival, progression-free survival, adverse events, and patient-reported quality of life.

Results

Among the 88 patients randomized to either SOC (n = 45) or SOC plus disulfiram and copper (n = 43), 63 (72%) were male; the mean (SD) age was 55.4 (11.5) years. There was no significant difference between the study groups (SOC vs SOC plus disulfiram and copper) in 6 months survival (62% [26 of 42] vs 44% [19 of 43]; P = .10). Median overall survival was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.4-10.2 months) with SOC and 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.9-9.3 months) with SOC plus disulfiram and copper, and median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (95% CI, 2.4-4.6 months) vs 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.7-2.6 months), respectively. More patients in the SOC plus disulfiram and copper group had adverse events grade 3 or higher (34% [14 of 41] vs 11% [5 of 44]; P = .02) and serious adverse events (41% [17 of 41] vs 16% [7 of 44]; P = .02), and 10 patients (24%) discontinued disulfiram treatment because of adverse effects.

Conclusions and Relevance

This randomized clinical trial found that among patients with recurrent glioblastoma, the addition of disulfiram and copper to chemotherapy, compared with chemotherapy alone, resulted in significantly increased toxic effects, but no significant difference in survival. These findings suggest that disulfiram and copper is without benefit in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02678975; EUDRACT Identifier: 2016-000167-16.

Tumour treating fields in glioblastoma: is the treatment tolerable, effective, and practical in UK patients?

BACKGROUND

Tumour Treating Fields (TTF) in combination with standard therapy, prolongs survival in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). The aim of the current study was to assess the feasibility of integrating TTF into a standard UK neuro-oncology service with a focus on patient tolerability, compliance, and treatment delivery.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed of UK patients with IDH 1 Wild Type, MGMT Unmethylated GBM treated with TTF, in conjunction with conventional therapy. Patient compliance data, device-specific tolerability questions, and an evaluation of disease progression and survival were collected. Monthly quality of life (QoL) questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 with BN-20) examined the trend of global health, psychosocial function, and symptom progression.

RESULTS

Nine patients were enrolled with a median age of 47 (seven males; two females). Overall, compliance with TTF was 89% (range 16-97%). Only one patient failed to comply with treatment. Patients tolerated the device with minimal side effects. Eight patients described mild to moderate skin irritation, whilst all patients were keen to recommend the device to other patients (100%). Most patients found the weight and size of the device to be its biggest drawback (72%). Progression-free survival was 5.5 months and median overall survival was 14.9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

TTF was well-tolerated amongst a small cohort of UK patients, who were able to comply with treatment without any significant complication. QoL questionnaires showed no sustained deterioration in global health, physical and emotional function until the final months of life when the disease burden was greatest.

Development of a core outcome set and identification of patient-reportable outcomes for primary brain tumour trials: protocol for the COBra study

INTRODUCTION

Primary brain tumours, specifically gliomas, are a rare disease group. The disease and treatment negatively impacts on patients and those close to them. The high rates of physical and cognitive morbidity differ from other cancers causing reduced health-related quality of life. Glioma trials using outcomes that allow holistic analysis of treatment benefits and risks enable informed care decisions. Currently, outcome assessment in glioma trials is inconsistent, hindering evidence synthesis. A core outcome set (COS) - an agreed minimum set of outcomes to be measured and reported - may address this. International initiatives focus on defining core outcomes assessments across brain tumour types. This protocol describes the development of a COS involving UK stakeholders for use in glioma trials, applicable across glioma types, with provision to identify subsets as required. Due to stakeholder interest in data reported from the patient perspective, outcomes from the COS that can be patient-reported will be identified.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Stage I: (1) trial registry review to identify outcomes collected in glioma trials and (2) systematic review of qualitative literature exploring glioma patient and key stakeholder research priorities. Stage II: semi-structured interviews with glioma patients and caregivers. Outcome lists will be generated from stages I and II. Stage III: study team will remove duplicate items from the outcome lists and ensure accessible terminology for inclusion in the Delphi survey. Stage IV: a two-round Delphi process whereby the outcomes will be rated by key stakeholders. Stage V: a consensus meeting where participants will finalise the COS. The study team will identify the COS outcomes that can be patient-reported. Further research is needed to match patient-reported outcomes to available measures.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained (REF SMREC 21/59, Cardiff University School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee). Study findings will be disseminated widely through conferences and journal publication. The final COS will be adopted and promoted by patient and carer groups and its use by funders encouraged.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021236979.

Characteristics of health-related quality of life and related factors in patients with brain tumors treated with rehabilitation therapy

Background

Rehabilitation therapy during hospitalization is effective in improving activities of daily living (ADL) and physical function in patients with brain tumors. However, there are few studies on the effect of rehabilitation therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with brain tumors. Additionally, the EuroQol-5Dimension-5Level (EQ-5D-5L) index score has not been reported as an outcome. This study aimed to investigate the HRQOL of patients with brain tumors who underwent rehabilitation therapy and investigated the factors affecting the EQ-5D-5L index score from various perspectives, including various brain tumor type and recurrence. In addition, we examined the relationship between the EQ-5D-5L index score, disease-specific HRQOL scale, and ADL.

Methods

Patients with brain tumors who underwent treatment and rehabilitation at Single tertiary care academic medical center were included in this cross-sectional study. We used the EQ-5D-5L, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire core 30, and EORTC quality of life questionnaire brain cancer module to evaluate HRQOL. ADL were assessed using the functional independence measure (FIM). The relationship between each HRQOL assessment score and the FIM was analyzed, and the influence of related factors was assessed by multiple regression analysis.

Results

This study included 76 patients. The EQ-5D-5L index score was 0.689 for all patients with brain tumors and 0.574 for those with glioblastomas, which was the lowest value. There was a moderate correlation between the EQ-5D-5L index score and FIM (r = 0.627, p < 0.001). In addition, the EQ-5D-5L index score was significantly correlated with most of the items of the disease-specific HRQOL scale. Multiple regression analysis revealed that glioblastoma histology (coefficient: − 0.373, p = 0.005) and recurrence (coefficient: − 0.273, p = 0.020) were independent factors affecting the EQ-5D-5L index score.

Conclusions

Patients with glioblastoma undergoing rehabilitation have reduced HRQOL, which was influenced by glioblastoma histology and recurrence.

Neurosurgical Clinical Trials for Glioblastoma: Current and Future Directions

The mainstays of glioblastoma treatment, maximal safe resection, radiotherapy preserving neurological function, and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy have not changed for the past 17 years despite significant advances in the understanding of the genetics and molecular biology of glioblastoma. This review highlights the neurosurgical foundation for glioblastoma therapy. Here, we review the neurosurgeon’s role in several new and clinically-approved treatments for glioblastoma. We describe delivery techniques such as blood–brain barrier disruption and convection-enhanced delivery (CED) that may be used to deliver therapeutic agents to tumor tissue in higher concentrations than oral or intravenous delivery. We mention pivotal clinical trials of immunotherapy for glioblastoma and explain their outcomes. Finally, we take a glimpse at ongoing clinical trials and promising translational studies to predict ways that new therapies may improve the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma.

Radiotherapy-drug combinations in the treatment of glioblastoma: a brief review

Glioblastoma (GBM) accounts for over 50% of gliomas and carries the worst prognosis of all solid tumors. Owing to the limited local control afforded by surgery alone, efficacious adjuvant treatments such as radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy are fundamental in achieving durable disease control. The best clinical outcomes are achieved with tri-modality treatment consisting of surgery, RT and systemic therapy. While RT-chemotherapy combination regimens are well established in oncology, this approach was largely unsuccessful in GBM until the introduction of temozolomide. The success of this combination has stimulated the search for other candidate drugs for concomitant use with RT in GBM. This review seeks to collate the current evidence for these agents and synthesize possible future directions for the field.

Quality of life in patients with glioblastoma and their relatives

OBJECTIVES

Glioblastoma is the most aggressive primary brain tumour in adults. The rapid decline of physical and cognitive functions is likely to affect patients and relatives during the entire course of disease. The aim of this study was to describe and compare (a) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychological symptoms between patients with glioblastoma and their relatives, and (b) HRQoL between patients and a general population over time.

METHODS

At baseline, 63 patients and 63 relatives were included. The participants completed the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS) at seven different occasions from pre-surgery until two years post-surgery. A comparison of SF-36 was made between patients and an age- and gender-matched control group. Descriptive analysis, effect size and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used.

RESULTS

Relatives scored lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and higher symptoms of anxiety than patients, whilst patients scored worse in the physical parts of the SF-36. Three weeks post-surgery, relatives scored their lowest HRQoL and had the highest risk of anxiety symptoms. Comparing patients with controls, the patients rated worse in both the mental and physical component summaries in HRQoL at most time points.

CONCLUSION

Both patients and relatives showed deterioration of HRQoL. In addition, relatives showed high frequency of anxiety symptoms. Our data reveal that relatives of patients with glioblastoma need attention throughout the disease trajectory and they also need support at the right time point.

Defining the impact of adjuvant treatment on the prognosis of patients with inoperable glioblastoma undergoing biopsy only: does the survival benefit outweigh the treatment effort?

Patients with inoperable glioblastoma (GBM) usually experience worse prognosis compared to those in whom gross total resection (GTR) is achievable. Considering the treatment duration and its side effects identification of patients with survival benefit from treatment is essential to guarantee the best achievable quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival benefit from radio-chemotherapy and to identify clinical, molecular, and imaging parameters associated with better outcome in patients with biopsied GBMs. Consecutive patients with inoperable GBM who underwent tumor biopsy at our department from 2005 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had histologically confirmed GBM and were followed up until death. The overall survival (OS) was calculated from date of diagnosis to date of death. Clinical, radiological, and molecular predictors of OS were evaluated. A total of 95 patients with biopsied primary GBM were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 64.3 ± 13.2 years; 56.8% (54/95) were male, and 43.2% (41/95) female. Median OS in the entire cohort was 5.5 months. After stratification for adjuvant treatment, a higher median OS was found in the group with adjuvant treatment (7 months, range 2–88) compared to the group without treatment (1 month, range 1–5) log-rank test, p < 0.0001. Patients with inoperable GBM undergoing biopsy indeed experience a very limited OS. Adjuvant treatment is associated with significantly longer OS compared to patients not receiving treatment and should be considered, especially in younger patients with good clinical condition at presentation.

Health-Related Quality of Life for Patients Receiving Tumor Treating Fields for Glioblastoma

Background

To date, there has been no large-scale, real-world study of the health-related quality of life outcomes for patients using tumor treating fields (TTFields) therapy for glioblastoma (GBM) treatment.

Methods

A survey was mailed to 2,815 patients actively using TTFields for treatment of GBM in the USA (n = 2,182) and Europe (n = 633). The survey included patient-reported demographic and clinical information, as well as EuroQol’s EQ-5D-5L and visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) overall health score.

Results

A total of 1,106 applicable patients responded to the survey (USA = 782 and Europe = 324), with a mean age of 58.6 years (SD = 12.3). The average time since diagnosis and time using TTFields were 21.5 months (SD = 25.1) and 13.5 months (SD = 13.2), respectively. Over 61% of patients had been diagnosed at least 1 year prior and 28.4% at least 2 years prior; 45 patients (4.2%) had been diagnosed at least 5 years prior. Progressed disease was reported in 307 patients, while 690 reported non-progressed disease. Regression analyses showed that GBM disease progression and older age had predictable negative associations (p < 0.001) with most EQ-5D-5L dimensions and the EQ-VAS. However, longer time since diagnosis was associated with improved self-care (p < 0.05), usual activities (p < 0.01), and EQ-VAS (p < 0.05) overall and in patients with progressed disease (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, and p < 0.01, respectively). Additionally, longer time using TTFields was associated with improved mobility (p < 0.05), self-care (p < 0.001), usual activities (p < 0.01), and EQ-VAS (p < 0.01) overall; with improved EQ-VAS in progression-free patients (p < 0.05); and with improved mobility (p < 0.05), self-care (p < 0.01), usual activities (p < 0.05), and EQ-VAS (p < 0.05) in patients with progressed disease.

Conclusion

This is the largest real-world study of patient-reported quality of life in GBM and TTFields treatment to date. It shows unsurprising negative associations between quality of life and disease progression and older age, as well as more novel, positive associations between quality of life and longer time since diagnosis and time using TTFields therapy.

Ventricle wall resection contributes to supramaximal resection and prognosis in SVZ-involved frontal gliomas: A single center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Frontal glioma frequently invaded the subventricular zone (SVZ), which existed glioma stem cells and might be involved in the development of primary and recurrent gliomas. We attempted to identify whether ventricle wall resection contributed to the maximal extent of resection (EOR) and increased the patient's survival during frontal glioma resection.

METHODS

A total of 151 adult patients with primary SVZ-involved frontal gliomas were obtained between January 2012 and December 2018. We analyzed clinical data, EOR, complications and survival profiles between the ventricle wall group and the ventricle intact/opening group.

RESULTS

Applying ventricle wall removal had similar effect on the improvement of neurological function compared to applying ventricle intact/opening and did not increase the incidence of new neurological deficits, hydrocephalus, and ependymal dissemination in SVZ-involved frontal gliomas. A positive correlation was identified between EOR and the ventricle wall handling (r = 0.487, P < 0.001), which indicated that ventricle wall resection could contribute to achieve supramaximal resection. Applying supramaximal resection and ventricle wall resection could significantly prolong overall survival and progression free survival. Ventricle wall resection could be regarded as an independent prognostic indicator for both overall survival and progression free survival in patients with SVZ-involved frontal gliomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventricle wall resection in SVZ-involved frontal gliomas could contribute to achieve supramaximal resection and could significantly prolong overall survival and progression free survival.

Impact of surgical resection of butterfly glioblastoma on survival: a meta-analysis based on comparative studies

Butterfly glioblastoma (bGBM) is a rare brain tumor that invades both hemispheres by crossing the corpus callosum. bGBM is associated with a dismal prognosis with a median survival time of a few months. Surgical resection is a rare treatment option due to the unfavorable location and assumed poor risk-to-benefit ratio. Therefore, a biopsy-alone approach is considered the main treatment option. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate whether resection of bGBM is associated with improved overall survival compared with biopsy alone. We searched three databases to find studies that compare resection with biopsy in 6-, 12- and 18-months overall survival in patients with bGBM. We calculated the pooled relative risk (RR) of mortality using a random-effects model. Five studies with 194 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Mortality was decreased for resection compared with biopsy at 6-months (RR 0.63 [95% CI 0.44-0.91]). No significant differences in overall survival were found at 12 (RR 0.76 [95% CI 0.50-1.14]) and 18-months (RR 0.84 [95% CI 0.56-1.26]). Surgical resection of bGBM is associated with an improved 6-months overall survival compared with biopsy alone. We have not found strong evidence supporting the superiority of resection over biopsy alone in overall survival at 12 and 18-months.

Functional Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life Following Glioma Surgery

Functional outcome following glioma surgery is defined as how the patient functions or feels. Functional outcome is a coprimary end point of surgery in patients with diffuse glioma, together with oncological outcome. In this review, we structure the functional outcome measurements following glioma surgery as reported in the last 5 yr. We review various perspectives on functional outcome of glioma surgery with available measures, and offer suggestions for their use. From the recent neurosurgical literature, 160 publications were retrieved fulfilling the selection criteria. In these publications, neurological outcomes were reported most often, followed by activities of daily living, seizure outcomes, neurocognitive outcomes, and health-related quality of life or well-being. In more than a quarter of these publications functional outcome was not reported. A minimum essential consensus set of functional outcome measurements would benefit comparison across neurosurgical reports. The consensus set should be based on a combination of clinician- and patient-reported outcomes, assessed at a predefined time before and after surgery. The selected measurements should have psychometric properties supporting the intended use including validity-related evidence, reliability, and sensitivity to detect meaningful change with minimal burden to ensure compliance. We circulate a short survey as a start towards reporting guidelines. Many questions remain to better understand, report, and improve functional outcome following glioma surgery.

Between-hospital variation in rates of complications and decline of patient performance after glioblastoma surgery in the dutch Quality Registry Neuro Surgery

Introduction

For decisions on glioblastoma surgery, the risk of complications and decline in performance is decisive. In this study, we determine the rate of complications and performance decline after resections and biopsies in a national quality registry, their risk factors and the risk-standardized variation between institutions.

Methods

Data from all 3288 adults with first-time glioblastoma surgery at 13 hospitals were obtained from a prospective population-based Quality Registry Neuro Surgery in the Netherlands between 2013 and 2017. Patients were stratified by biopsies and resections. Complications were categorized as Clavien-Dindo grades II and higher. Performance decline was considered a deterioration of more than 10 Karnofsky points at 6 weeks. Risk factors were evaluated in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Patient-specific expected and observed complications and performance declines were summarized for institutions and analyzed in funnel plots.

Results

For 2271 resections, the overall complication rate was 20 % and 16 % declined in performance. For 1017 biopsies, the overall complication rate was 11 % and 30 % declined in performance. Patient-related characteristics were significant risk factors for complications and performance decline, i.e. higher age, lower baseline Karnofsky, higher ASA classification, and the surgical procedure. Hospital characteristics, i.e. case volume, university affiliation and biopsy percentage, were not. In three institutes the observed complication rate was significantly less than expected. In one institute significantly more performance declines were observed than expected, and in one institute significantly less.

Conclusions

Patient characteristics, but not case volume, were risk factors for complications and performance decline after glioblastoma surgery. After risk-standardization, hospitals varied in complications and performance declines.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-021-03697-8.

Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting according to the CONSORT statement in randomized controlled trials with glioblastoma patients

Background

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) represent the best evidence in oncology research. Glioblastoma is the most frequent and deadly primary brain tumor, affecting health-related quality of life. An important end point is patient-reported outcomes (PROs). There are no data regarding how well publications of glioblastoma RCTs report PROs. A specific PRO extension of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement was created to improve the quality of reporting. The aim of this study was to evaluate adherence to the CONSORT-PRO statement in reporting RCTs addressing the treatment of patients with glioblastoma. PRO analysis methodology was explored and criteria associated with higher quality of reporting were investigated.

Methods

From PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library databases, all phase 2 and 3 RCTs related to glioblastoma published between 1995 and 2018 were reviewed according to the CONSORT-PRO statements. An overall quality score on a 0 to 100 scale was defined based on these criteria and factors associated with this score were identified.

Results

Forty-four RCTs were identified as relevant according to predefined criteria. The median overall quality score was 26. No difference was observed regarding reporting quality over the years. CONSORT-PRO items concerning data collection and analysis were poorly reported. Thirty-four trials (77%) used longitudinal data. The most frequent statistical method for PROs analysis was the mean change from baseline (63%). Factors associated with improved overall quality score were the presence of a secondary publication dedicated to PROs results, the statement of any targeted dimensions, and when trials reported results using multiple methods.

Conclusion

Despite the importance of measuring PROs in patients with glioblastoma, employment of the CONSORT-PRO statement is poor in RCTs.

Unique Interplay Between Molecular miR-181b/d Biomarkers and Health Related Quality of Life Score in the Predictive Glioma Models

In the last decade, an increasing amount of research has been conducted analyzing microRNA expression changes in glioma tissue and its expressed exosomes, but there is still sparse information on microRNAs or other biomarkers and their association with patients’ functional/psychological outcomes. In this study, we performed a combinational analysis measuring miR-181b and miR-181d expression levels by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), evaluating isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), and O-6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status in 92 post-surgical glioma samples and 64 serum exosomes, including patients’ quality of life evaluation applying European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire for cancer patients (QLQ-30), EORTC the Brain Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-BN20), and the Karnofsky performance status (KPS). The tumoral expression of miR-181b was lower in grade III and glioblastoma, compared to grade II glioma patients (p < 0.05). Additionally, for the first time, we demonstrated the association between miR-181 expression levels and patients’ quality of life. A positive correlation was observed between tumoral miR-181d levels and glioma patients’ functional parameters (p < 0.05), whereas increased exosomal miR-181b levels indicated a worse functional outcome (p < 0.05). Moreover, elevated miR-181b exosomal expression can indicate a significantly shorter post-surgical survival time for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. In addition, both tumoral and exosomal miR-181 expression levels were related to patients’ functioning and tumor-related symptoms. Our study adds to previous findings by demonstrating the unique interplay between molecular miR-181b/d biomarkers and health related quality of life (HRQOL) score as both variables remained significant in the predictive glioma models.

Health-related quality of life and emotional well-being in patients with glioblastoma and their relatives

PURPOSE

The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients with glioblastoma is known to be largely affected. Little is known about the HRQoL for relatives and the relationship between these two. To optimize family care, such issues need to be addressed early on, preferably from the time of diagnosis. This study aimed to describe and compare the HRQoL of patients with glioblastoma and their relatives before surgery.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study including 89 patients diagnosed with glioblastoma and their relatives. HRQoL (Short Form Health Survey, SF-36) and emotional well-being (hospital anxiety and depression scale, HADS) were analysed with descriptive, comparative and multivariable regression analyses.

RESULTS

Relatives scored worse for mental HRQoL (p < 0.001) and for symptoms of anxiety (p < 0.001) and depression (p = 0.022) compared to patients. The multivariable regression showed an increased risk of affected mental HRQoL in relatives of patients with poor functional status (WHO) (p = 0.01) and higher levels in symptoms of anxiety (p = 0.03), or when relatives had low physical HRQoL themselves (p = 0.01). There was increased risk of affected mental HRQoL in patients with comorbidities (p = 0.003), and when the respective relative showed higher levels in symptoms of anxiety (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Relatives scored worse for mental HRQoL and emotional well-being than patients, suggesting that HRQoL in patients and relatives might be connected to symptoms of anxiety in the respective individual at disease onset. The results illustrate the need to screen HRQoL and emotional well-being in both patients and relatives from an early stage-before surgery.

Advancements in predicting outcomes in patients with glioma: a surgical perspective

Introduction: Diffuse glioma is a challenging neurosurgical entity. Although surgery does not provide a cure, it may greatly influence survival, brain function, and quality of life. Surgical treatment is by nature highly personalized and outcome prediction is very complex. To engage and succeed in this balancing act it is important to make best use of the information available to the neurosurgeon.Areas covered: This narrative review provides an update on advancements in predicting outcomes in patients with glioma that are relevant to neurosurgeons.Expert opinion: The classical 'gut feeling' is notoriously unreliable and better prediction strategies for patients with glioma are warranted. There are numerous tools readily available for the neurosurgeon in predicting tumor biology and survival. Predicting extent of resection, functional outcome, and quality of life remains difficult. Although machine-learning approaches are currently not readily available in daily clinical practice, there are several ongoing efforts with the use of big data sets that are likely to create new prediction models and refine the existing models.

Influence of Residual Disease Following Surgical Resection in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma on Clinical, Neurocognitive, and Patient Reported Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The influence of subtotal resection (STR) on neurocognitive function (NCF), quality of life, and symptom burden in glioblastoma is unknown. If bevacizumab preferentially benefits patients with STR is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To examine these uncertainties.

METHODS

NCF and patient reported outcomes (PRO) were prospectively collected in NRG Oncology RTOG 0525 and 0825. Changes in NCF and PRO measures from baseline to prespecified times were examined by Wilcoxon test, and mixed effects longitudinal modeling, to assess differences between patients who received STR vs gross-total resection. Changes were also compared among STR patients on 0825 receiving placebo vs bevacizumab to assess for a preferential therapeutic effect. Overall survival between STR and gross-total resection patients was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 427 patients were eligible with STR present in 37%. At baseline, patients with STR had worse NCF, worse MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Neurological Factor ratings (P = .004), and European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (P = .002). Longitudinal multivariate analysis associated STR with worse NCF (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised Delayed Recognition [P = .048], Trail Making Test Part A [P = .035], and Controlled Oral Word Association [P = .049]). One hundred eighty-three STR patients from 0825 were analyzed (89 bevacizumab, 94 placebo); bevacizumab failed to demonstrate improvement in select NCF or PRO measures.

CONCLUSION

STR patients had worse NCF and PROs before therapy. During adjuvant therapy, STR patients had worse objective NCF, despite accounting for tumor location. STR did not result in a detriment to OS. The addition of bevacizumab did not preferentially improve PRO or NCF outcomes in STR patients.

Quality of Life Improvements in Patients with Lymphedema After Surgical or Nonsurgical Interventions with 1-Year Follow-Up

Background: Lymphedema may impact patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The purpose of this study was to evaluate HRQoL after two different treatments to the 12-month follow-up point. Methods and Results: Study participants were patients with moderate lymphedema in the upper or lower limb who attended a Swedish rehabilitation program (RP) undergoing conservative treatment, or those with severe, chronic lymphedema dominated by excess adipose tissue, who underwent liposuction (LS) combined with controlled compression therapy (CCT) in Australia, Scotland, or Sweden. The patients completed the Lymphedema Quality of Life Inventory (LyQLI) before intervention and after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Mean values and standard deviations were calculated for total limb volume and excess limb volume. Mean values were also calculated for the three LyQLI domains (physical, psychosocial, and practical). To detect and analyze differences in LyQLI responses in the three domains, the Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed. In the RP, 18 eligible patients completed the LyQLI. The results show improvements in HRQoL in physical (p = 0.003) and psychosocial domains (p = 0.002) at 1 month after the RP, with results remaining steady for 12 months for the physical domain (p = 0.024). Fifty-seven eligible LS patients completed the LyQLI. The results show improvements in HRQoL in all three domains (p < 0.001), with results remaining steady up to the 12-month follow-up (p < 0.001). The total volume in affected limb and the excess volume decreased significantly in both patient groups 1 month after intervention (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Treatment with a conservative RP in moderate lymphedema or with LS combined with CCT in severe lymphedema improves HRQoL.

Quality of Life Perception, Cognitive Function, and Psychological Status in a Real-world Population of Glioblastoma Patients Treated With Radiotherapy and Temozolomide: A Single-center Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), cognitive function, and psychological status represent an important focus during the treatment of glioblastoma patients. Nevertheless, few randomized, prospective clinical trials have analyzed these factors, and very little is known in the real-clinical world. We evaluated these characteristics in glioblastoma patients treated with standard first-line therapy outside clinical trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 111 newly, histologically diagnosed glioblastoma patients treated at our oncology center with radiotherapy and temozolomide were prospectively enrolled. No patient was enrolled in an experimental clinical trial. We assessed HRQoL, cognitive function, and psychological status before starting treatment, at the end of radiotherapy, and every 3 months until 9 months after the end of radiotherapy using EORTC QLQ-C30, BN20, MMSE, and HADS questionnaires.

RESULTS

Global health status, physical, cognitive, and social functioning remained unchanged throughout the study period. A statistically significant change was found in emotional functioning as well as a clinically meaningful amelioration in role functioning between the baseline assessment and 9 months after radiotherapy. Patients older than 65 years reported greater impairment on the bladder control scale than younger patients. When considering tumor location, global health status, communication deficit, and drowsiness, scores were significantly different between the right and left hemispheres. Female patients had a clinically relevant lower score for physical functioning at baseline and 3 months after radiation therapy. Female patients also had a clinically relevant lower depression score at 9 months after radiation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In routine neurooncology practice, HRQoL, cognitive function, and psychological status did not worsen during first-line treatment in glioblastoma patients receiving standard radiotherapy and temozolomide treatment. However, some patient subgroups, such as elderly and female patients, may have different experiences with treatment, and further investigation is required.

A new acoustic coupling fluid with ability to reduce ultrasound imaging artefacts in brain tumour surgery-a phase I study

Background

A novel acoustic coupling fluid (ACF), with the potential to reduce surgically induced image artefacts during intraoperative ultrasound imaging in brain tumour surgery, has been evaluated with respect to image quality and safety in a clinical phase 1 study.

Methods

Fifteen patients with glioblastoma (WHO grade IV) were included. All adverse events were registered in a 6-month study period. During acquisition of 3D ultrasound image volumes, three different concentrations of the ACF and Ringer’s solution were filled into the resection cavity. The effect of ACF on the ultrasound images was rated by the operating surgeon, and by five independent neurosurgeons evaluating a pair of blinded images from all patients. Images from all patients were analysed by comparing pixel brightness in a noise-affected region and a reference region.

Results

The operating surgeon deemed the ACF images to have less noise than images obtained with Ringers’s solution. The blinded evaluations by the independent neurosurgeons were significantly in favour of ACF (p < 0.0001). The analyses of pixel intensities showed that the ACF images had lower amount of noise than images obtained with Ringer’s solution. No radiological sign of inflammation nor circulatory changes was found in the early postoperative MR images. Of the nine complications registered as serious events in the study period, none was deemed to be caused by the ACF.

Conclusion

The ultrasound (US) images obtained using ACF have significantly less noise than US images obtained with Ringer’s solution. The rate of adverse events was comparable to what has been reported for similar groups of patients.

Health Related Quality of Life in Adult Low and High-Grade Glioma Patients Using the National Institutes of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Neuro-QOL Assessments

Health related quality of life (HRQOL) measures have become increasingly important in the management of glioma patients in both research and clinical practice settings. Functional impairment is common in low-grade and high-grade glioma patients as the disease has both oncological and neurological manifestations. Natural disease history as well as medical or surgical treatment can negatively influence HRQOL. There are no universal standards for HRQOL assessment in glioma patients. In this study, we examine patient perspectives on functional outcome domains and report the prevalence of impairments rates using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Neuro-QOL item banks as measures of HRQOL. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected dataset involving 79 glioma patients reveals that quality of life concerns are the most important consideration behind making decisions about treatment in 80.7% of patients. The prevalence of functional impairment by PROMIS and NEURO-QOL assessment is high, ranging from 28.6% in the physical function domain to 43.9% in the cognitive function domain. Pain and anxiety related to physical decline is higher in LGG patients compared to HGG patients. Aphasia severity also impacts HRQOL. The results of this study suggest that the PROMIS and NEURO-QOL assessments may be important HRQOL metrics for future use in larger clinical research and clinical trial settings.

Brain atlas for assessing the impact of tumor location on perioperative quality of life in patients with high-grade glioma: A prospective population-based cohort study

Background

Tumor location is important for surgical decision making. Particular attention is paid to regions that contain sensorimotor and language functions, but it is unknown if these are the most important regions from the patients' perspective.

Objective

To develop an atlas for depicting and assessing the potential importance of tumor location for perioperative health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma.

Methods

Patient-reported HRQoL data and semi-automatically segmented preoperative 3D MRI-images were combined in 170 patients. The images were registered to a standardized space where the individual tumors were given the values and color intensity of the corresponding HRQoL. Descriptive brain maps of HRQoL, defined quantitative analyses, and voxel-based lesion symptom mapping comparing patients with tumors in different locations were made.

Results

There was no statistical difference in overall perioperative HRQoL between patients with tumors located in left or right hemisphere, between patients with tumors in different lobes, or between patients with tumors located in non-eloquent, near eloquent, or eloquent areas. Patients with tumors involving the internal capsule, and patients with preoperative motor symptoms and postoperative motor deficits, reported significantly worse overall HRQoL-scores.

Conclusions

The impact of anatomical tumor location on overall perioperative HRQoL seems less than frequently believed, and the distinction between critical and less critical brain regions seems more unclear according to the patients than perhaps when judged by physicians. However, worse HRQoL was found in patients with tumors in motor-related regions, indicating that these areas are crucial also from the patients' perspective.

•

The impact of tumor location on patient-reported overall quality of life is low.

•

There is no “dominant hemisphere” from the patients' perspective.

•

Motor related regions seem to be most crucial for the patients.

Disulfiram repurposing combined with nutritional copper supplement as add-on to chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma (DIRECT): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background: Disulfiram (DSF) is a well-tolerated, inexpensive, generic drug that has been in use to treat alcoholism since the 1950s. There is now independent preclinical data that supports DSF as an anticancer agent, and experimental data suggest that copper may increase its anti-neoplastic properties. There is also some clinical evidence that DSF is a promising anticancer agent in extracranial cancers. In glioblastoma, DSF induced O 6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) inhibition may increase response to alkylating chemotherapy. A recent phase I study demonstrated the safety of DSF in glioblastoma patients when DSF was administered at doses below 500 mg/day together with chemotherapy. We plan to assess the effects of DSF combined with nutritional copper supplement (DSF-Cu) as an adjuvant to alkylating chemotherapy in glioblastoma treatment. Methods: In an academic, industry independent, multicenter, open label randomized controlled phase II/III trial with parallel group design (1:1) we will assess the efficacy and safety of DSF-Cu in glioblastoma treatment. The study will include 142 patients at the time of first recurrence of glioblastoma where salvage therapy with alkylating chemotherapy is planned. Patients will be randomized to treatment with or without DSF-Cu. Primary end-point is survival at 6 months. Secondary end-points are overall survival, progression free survival, quality of life, contrast enhancing tumor volume and safety. Discussion: There is a need to improve the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Results from this randomized controlled trial with DSF-Cu in glioblastoma will serve as preliminary evidence of the future role of DSF-Cu in glioblastoma treatment and a basis for design and power estimations of future studies. In this publication we provide rationale for our choices and discuss methodological issues. Trial registration: The study underwent registration in EudraCT 2016-000167-16 (Date: 30.03.2016,) and Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02678975 (Date: 31.01.2016) before initiating the study.

Relationship between symptom burden and health status: analysis of the MDASI-BT and EQ-5D

Background

Patients with glioma are highly symptomatic and often have functional limitations from the time of diagnosis. Measuring health status may have value in determining impact of disease. This study provided a description of health status and utility scores in glioma patients throughout the illness trajectory using the EQ-5D (a functional measure of general health status). Furthermore, it evaluated the information provided by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT; a measure of symptom burden and interference) in describing health-related quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D.

Methods

Glioma patients completed the EQ-5D and MDASI-BT. Disease and clinical details were collected by medical record review. Linear regression evaluated whether MDASI-BT scores adequately predict patient health outcomes measured by the EQ-5D.

Results

The sample included 100 patients (65% male, 78% with a glioblastoma, median age 52 [range, 20-75], 56% in active treatment). Seventy-two percent of patients reported functional limitations in at least 1 area. Extreme cases reported inability to perform usual activities (8%) and significant anxiety/depression (5%). The MDASI-BT neurologic factor and activity-related interference (walking/activity/work) explained 52% of the variability in the EQ-5D in this patient population while adjusting for the effect of tumor grade, recurrence status, and performance status.

Conclusions

The majority of glioma patients reported at least 1 functional limitation on the EQ-5D. Over half of the variance in the EQ-5D was explained by the MDASI-BT, performance status, tumor grade, and recurrence status. The resultant model demonstrates the significant contribution of symptom burden on health status in glioma patients.

Acute care in glioblastoma: the burden and the consequences

Background

The utilization of inpatient medical services by patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is not well studied. We sought to describe causes, frequency, and outcomes of acute care visits in GBM.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of 158 GBM patients at the University of Rochester over 5 years. Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify all local and outside acute care visits. Acute care visits were defined as any encounter resulting in an emergency department visit or inpatient admission.

Results

Seventy-one percent (112/158) of GBM patients had 235 acute care visits corresponding to 163 hospitalizations (69%) and 72 emergency department visits (31%). Sixty-three percent of patients had multiple visits. Admission diagnoses were seizure (33%), neurosurgical procedure (15%), infection (12%), focal neurologic symptoms (9%), and venous thromboembolism (VTE, 9%). Forty-six patients had 1 or more visits for seizures. Median time to first acute care visit was 65.6 days and 22% of patients had an acute care visit within 30 days of diagnosis. Median length of stay was 5 days. Thirty-five percent of admitted patients were discharged home; 62% required a higher level of care than prior to admission (23% were discharged home with services, 17% to a nursing facility, 16% to hospice, 6% to acute rehab) and 3% died. Thirty-eight percent of patients had ACV within 30 days of death. Median survival was 14 months for patients who had acute care visits and 22.2 months for patients who did not.

Conclusion

The majority of GBM patients utilize acute care, most commonly for seizures. The high number of emergency department visits, short length of stay, and many patients discharged home suggest that some acute care visits may be avoidable.

Is there a response shift in generic health-related quality of life 6 months after glioma surgery?

Background

Patients may recalibrate internal standards when faced with a serious diagnosis or neurological deficits. This so-called response shift is important to understand in longitudinal health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data, but this is not quantitatively assessed in glioma patients.

Methods

Patients with gliomas were eligible for this HRQoL study. We used EuroQol-5D 3 L to assess generic HRQoL with assessment preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. At time of follow-up, patients scored how they considered their baseline HRQoL in retrospect using the same questionnaire (“then-test”).

Results

Seventy-three patients were enrolled between January 2013 and September 2015. With the then-test approach, the mean EQ-5D 3 L index was similar compared to baseline (0.77, mean difference 0.01, 95% CI −0.57 to 0.07, p = 0.82). Also, then-test and baseline VAS score were similar (mean difference 0, 95% CI −7 to 7, p = 0.97). However, a 0.10–0.13 difference from baseline was observed in patients that improved or deteriorated in HRQoL at follow-up according to the then-test EQ-5D 3 L index value. The direction of change as observed from the then-test was similar to the direction of clinical change, reducing the impact of any HRQoL change from baseline to follow-up.

Conclusions

On average, we observed no response shift using EQ-5D 3 L in the selection of glioma patients able to participate at 6 months after surgery. However, following change in HRQoL at follow-up, response shift seems to reduce the effects of HRQoL changes by lowering of internal standards in patients that deteriorate and raising the standards in patients that improve.

Suicidal ideation, depression, and health-related quality of life in patients with benign and malignant brain tumors: a prospective observational study in 83 patients

OBJECTIVE

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychosocial burden are of relevance in patients with intracranial tumors. We investigated the prevalence of suicidal ideation (SI), depression, and their association with HRQoL in patients with intra- (IA) and extraaxial (EA) tumors during the first 9 months after diagnosis.

METHODS

Patients were recruited immediately following surgery, and re-evaluated after 3, 6, and 9 months (EORTC QLQ-C30/BN20, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Appendix). Patients with a personal history of psychological comorbidity were excluded. Sociodemographic and clinical data were evaluated.

RESULTS

IA patients had lower functioning scores and experienced more symptoms. Global Health Status was significantly lower at baseline (p = 0.038), but improved over time (p < 0.001). Seventeen patients (21.5 %) admitted to having had SI at least once during the study period (IA: n = 10/EA: n = 7). The highest rates were observed after 6 (IA: 18.8 %) and 9 months (EA: 10.0 %). Patients reporting SI had significantly higher BDI scores [p = 0.22 (baseline), p = 0.031 (3 months), p < 0.001 (6 months)]. After 6 months, HRQoL differed greatest between patients with and without SI. Most patients experienced good familial support (76 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with intracranial tumors suffer from decreased HRQoL and SI regardless of histopathology. SI is associated with higher BDI scores, but not evident depression (BDI ≥ 18). Thus, patients should be screened specifically and regularly. Lower HRQoL and greatest prevalence of SI at 6 months may help clinicians to find the right time for careful monitoring of patients at risk.