Thirty-day readmission and reoperation rates after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus those after cervical disc replacement

Presentation and management of infection in total disc replacement: A review

Background

Total disc replacement (TDR) is widely used in the treatment of cervical and lumbar spine pathologies. Although TDR infection, particularly delayed infection, is uncommon, the results can be devastating, and consensus on clinical management remains elusive. In this review of the literature, we asked: (1) What are the reported rates of TDR infection; (2) What are the clinical characteristics of TDR infection; and (3) How has infection been managed for TDR patients?

Methods

We performed a search of the literature using PubMed and Embase to identify studies that reported TDR infection rates, the identification and management of TDR infection, or TDR failures with positive cultures. Twenty database studies (17 focusing on the cervical spine and 3 on the lumbar spine) and 10 case reports representing 15 patients were reviewed along with device Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data reports.

Results

We found a lack of clarity regarding how infection was diagnosed, indicating a variation in clinical approach and highlighting the need for a standard definition of TDR infection. Furthermore, while reported infection rates were low, the absence of a clear definition prevented robust data analysis and may contribute to underreporting in the literature. We found that treatment strategy and success rely on several factors including patient symptoms and time to onset, microorganism type, and implant positioning/stability.

Conclusions

Although treatment strategies varied throughout the extant literature, common practices in eliminating infection and reconstructing the spine emerged. The results will inform future work on the creation of a more robust definition of TDR infection and as well as recommendations for management.

Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: an analysis of the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative Database

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) are established surgical options for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy, and cervical degenerative disc disease. However, current literature does not demonstrate a clear superiority between ACDF and CDA.

PURPOSE

To investigate procedural and patient-reported outcomes of ACDF and CDA among patients included in the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) database.

DESIGN

Retrospective study of prospectively collected outcomes registry data.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Individuals within the MSSIC database presenting with radiculopathy, myelopathy, or cervical spondylosis refractory to typical conservative care undergoing primary ACDF or CDA from January 4, 2016, to November 5, 2021.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Perioperative measures (including surgery length, length of stay, return to OR, any complications), patient-reported functional outcomes at 2-year follow-up (including return to work, patient satisfaction, PROMIS, EQ-5D, mJOA).

METHODS

Patients undergoing ACDF were matched 4:1 with those undergoing CDA; propensity analysis performed on operative levels (1- and 2- level procedures), presenting condition, demographics, and comorbidities. Initial comparisons performed with univariate testing and multivariate analysis performed with Poisson generalized estimating equation models clustering on hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 2,208 patients with ACDF and 552 patients with CDA were included. Baseline demographics were similar, with younger patients undergoing CDA (45.6 vs 48.6 years; p<.001). Myelopathy was more frequent in ACDF patients (30% vs 25%; p=.015). CDA was more frequently planned as an outpatient procedure. Length of stay was increased in ACDF (1.3 vs 1.0 days; p<.001). Functional outcomes were similar, with comparable proportions of patients meeting minimal clinically important difference thresholds in neck pain, arm pain, PROMIS, EQ-5D, and mJOA score. After multivariate regression, no significant differences were seen in surgical or functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates similar outcomes for those undergoing ACDF and CDA at 2 years. Previous meta-analyses of CDA clinical trial data adhere to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria required by clinical studies; this registry data provides "real world" clinical outcomes reflecting current practices for ACDF and CDA patient selection.

Risk Factors Associated With Poor Outcomes After Quadriceps Tendon Repair

Background

Ruptures of the quadriceps tendon present most frequently in older adults and individuals with underlying medical conditions.

Purpose

To examine the relationship between patient-specific factors and tear characteristics with outcomes after quadriceps tendon repair.

Study Design

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on all patients who underwent quadriceps tendon repair between January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2021, at a single institution. Patients <18 years and those with chronic quadriceps tendon tears (>6 weeks to surgery) were excluded. Information was collected regarding patient characteristics, presenting symptoms, tear characteristics, physical examination findings, and postoperative outcomes. Poor outcome was defined as a need for revision surgery, complications, postoperative range of motion of (ROM) <110° of knee flexion, and extensor lag of >5°.

Results

A total of 191 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were aged 58.5 ± 13.2 years at the time of surgery, were predominantly men (90.6%), and had a mean body mass index (BMI) of 32.2 ± 6.3 kg/m2. Patients underwent repair with either suture anchors (15.2%) or transosseous tunnels (84.8%). Postoperatively, 18.5% of patients experienced knee flexion ROM of <110°, 11.3% experienced extensor lag of >5°, 8.5% had complications, and 3.2% underwent revision. Increasing age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03 [95% CI, 1.004-1.07]) and female sex (OR, 3.82 [95% CI, 1.25-11.28]) were significantly associated with postoperative knee flexion of <110°, and increasing age (OR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.04-1.14]) and greater BMI (OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.05-1.23]) were significantly associated with postoperative extensor lag of >5°. Current smoking status (OR, 15.44 [95% CI, 3.97-65.90]) and concomitant retinacular tears (OR, 9.62 (95% CI, 1.67-184.14]) were associated with postoperative complications, and increasing age (OR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.02-1.08]) and greater BMI (OR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.02-1.14]) were associated with risk of acquiring any poor outcome criteria.

Conclusion

Patient-specific characteristics-such as increasing age, greater BMI, female sex, retinacular involvement, and current smoking status-were found to be risk factors for poor outcomes after quadriceps tendon repair. Further studies are needed to identify potentially modifiable risk factors that can be used to set patient expectations and improve outcomes.

Recovery Kinetics After Cervical Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained multisurgeon registry.

OBJECTIVE

To study recovery kinetics and associated factors after cervical spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Few studies have described return to activities cervical spine surgery. This is a big gap in the literature, as preoperative counseling and expectations before surgery are important.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent either anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical disk replacement (CDR) were included. Data collected included preoperative patient-reported outcome measures, return to driving, return to working, and discontinuation of opioids data. A multivariable regression was conducted to identify the factors associated with return to driving by 15 days, return to working by 15 days, and discontinuing opioids by 30 days.

RESULTS

Seventy ACDF patients and 70 CDR patients were included. Overall, 98.2% of ACDF patients and 98% of CDR patients returned to driving in 16 and 12 days, respectively; 85.7% of ACDF patients and 90.9% of CDR patients returned to work in 16 and 14 days; and 98.3% of ACDF patients and 98.3% of CDR patients discontinued opioids in a median of seven and six days. Though not significant, minimal (odds ratio (OR)=1.65) and moderate (OR=1.79) disability was associated with greater odds of returning to driving by 15 days. Sedentary work (OR=0.8) and preoperative narcotics (OR=0.86) were associated with decreased odds of returning to driving by 15 days. Medium (OR=0.81) and heavy (OR=0.78) intensity occupations were associated with decreased odds of returning to work by 15 days. High school education (OR=0.75), sedentary work (OR=0.79), and retired/not working (OR=0.69) were all associated with decreased odds of discontinuing opioids by 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Recovery kinetics for ACDF and CDR are comparable. Most patients return to all activities after ACDF and CDR within 16 days. These findings serve as an important compass for preoperative counseling.

Rates and reasons for reoperation within 30 and 90 days following cervical spine surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis of the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) registry

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Reoperation following cervical spinal surgery negatively impacts patient outcomes and increases health care system burden. To date, most studies have evaluated reoperations within 30 days after spine surgery and have been limited in scope and focus. Evaluation within the 90-day period, however, allows a more comprehensive assessment of factors associated with reoperation.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to assess the rates and reasons for reoperations after cervical spine surgery within 30 and 90 days.

DESIGN

We performed a retrospective analysis of a state-wide prospective, multi-center, spine-specific database of patients surgically treated for degenerative disease.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients 18 years of age or older who underwent cervical spine surgery for degenerative pathologies from February 2014 to May 2019. Operative criteria included all degenerative cervical spine procedures, including those with cervical fusions with contiguous extension down to T3.

OUTCOME MEASURES

We determined causes for reoperation and independent surgical and demographic risk factors impacting reoperation.

METHODS

Patient-specific and surgery-specific data was extracted from the registry using ICD-10-DM codes. Reoperations data was obtained through abstraction of medical records through 90 days. Univariate analysis was done using chi-square tests for categorical variables, t-tests for normally distributed variables, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for variables with skewed distributions. Odds ratios for return to the operating room (OR) were evaluated in multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 13,435 and 13,440 patients underwent cervical spine surgery and were included in the 30 and 90-day analysis, respectively. The overall reoperation rate was 1.24% and 3.30% within 30 and 90 days, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed within 30 days, procedures involving four or more levels, posterior only approach, and longer length of stay had increased odds of returning to the OR (p<.05), whereas private insurance had a decreased odds of return to OR (p<.05). Within 90 days, male sex, coronary artery disease (CAD), previous spine surgery, procedures with 4 or more levels, and longer length of stay had significantly increased odds of returning to the OR (p<.05). Non-white race, independent ambulatory status pre-operatively, and having private insurance had decreased odds of return to the OR (p<.05). The most common specified reasons for return to the OR within 30 days was hematoma (19%), infection (17%), and wound dehiscence (11%). Within 90 days, reoperation reasons were pain (10%), infection (9%), and hematoma (8%).

CONCLUSION

Reoperation rates after elective cervical spine surgery are 1.24% and 3.30% within 30 and 90 days, respectively. Within 30 days, four or more levels, posterior approach, and longer length of stay were risk factors for reoperation. Within 90 days, male sex, CAD, four or more levels, and longer length of hospital stay were risk factors for reoperation. Non-white demographic and independent preoperative ambulatory status were associated with decreased reoperation rates.

Risk Factors for Infection and Revision Surgery following Patellar Tendon and Quadriceps Tendon Repairs: An Analysis of 3,442 Patients

Disruption of the extensor mechanism is debilitating with surgical repair being the accepted treatment. The incidence of infection and reoperation after extensor mechanism repair are not well reported in the literature. Thus, the objective of the current study was to (1) determine the incidence of surgical site infection and reoperation within 1 year of primary extensor mechanism repair and (2) identify independent risk factors for infection and reoperation following patellar and quadriceps tendon repair. A retrospective review of the 100% Medicare Standard Analytic files from 2005 to 2014 was performed to identify patients undergoing isolated patellar tendon repair and quadriceps tendon repair. Diagnosis of infection within 1 year of operative intervention and revision repair were assessed. Extensor mechanism injuries in the setting of total knee arthroplasty and polytrauma were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate risk factors for postoperative infection and reoperation within 1 year. Infection occurred in 6.3% of patients undergoing patellar tendon repair and 2.6% of patients undergoing quadriceps tendon repair. Diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR] = 1.89, p = 0.005) was found to be an independent risk factor for infection following patellar tendon repair. Reoperation within 1 year occurred in 1.3 and 3.9% following patellar tendon and quadriceps tendon repair, respectively. Age less than 65 years (OR = 2.77, p = 0.024) and obesity (OR = 3.66, p = 0.046) were significant risk factors for reoperation after patellar tendon repair. Hypertension (OR = 2.13, p = 0.034), hypothyroidism (OR = 2.01, p = 0.010), and depression (OR = 2.41, p = 0.005) were significant risk factors for reoperation after quadriceps tendon repair. Diabetes mellitus was identified as a risk factor for infection after patellar tendon repair. Age less than 65 years, peripheral vascular disease, and congestive heart failure were risk factors for infection after quadriceps tendon repair. The current findings can be utilized to counsel patients regarding preoperative risk factors for postoperative complications prior to surgical intervention for extensor mechanism injuries.

Risk Factors of Unplanned Readmission after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

With an increasing number of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) being conducted for degenerative cervical disc disease, there is a rising interest in the related quality of management and healthcare costs. Unplanned readmission after ACDF affects both the quality of management and medical expenses. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the risk factors of unplanned readmission after ACDF to improve the quality of management and prevent increase in healthcare costs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify eligible studies using the searching terms, "readmission" and "ACDF." A total of 10 studies were included.

RESULTS

Among the demographic risk factors, older age [weighted mean difference (WMD), 3.93; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.30-5.56; p<0.001], male [odds ratio (OR), 1.23; 95% CI, 1.10-1.36; p<0.001], and private insurance (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.17-0.69; p<0.001) were significantly associated with unplanned readmission. Among patient characteristics, hypertension (HTN) (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.41-3.25; p<0.001), diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.20-2.11; p=0.001), coronary artery disease (CAD) (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 2.13-3.86; p<0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status grade >2 (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.68-2.72; p<0.001), and anxiety and depression (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.29-1.51; p<0.001) were significantly associated with unplanned readmission. Among the perioperative factors, pulmonary complications (OR, 22.52; 95% CI, 7.21-70.41; p<0.001) was significantly associated with unplanned readmission.

CONCLUSION

Male, older age, HTN, DM, CAD, ASA grade >2, anxiety and depression, pulmonary complications were significantly associated with an increased occurrence of unplanned readmission after ACDF.

Revision Anterior Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A National Analysis of the Associated Indications, Procedures, and Postoperative Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the associated indications, procedures, and postoperative outcomes after revision ACDA.

METHODS

We utilized a national database to identify adult(≥18 years) patients who underwent either a primary ACDA or removal of ACDA over a 10-year period(2008-2017). An in-depth assessment of the reasons for revision surgery and the subsequent procedures performed after the removal of ACDA was done by using both Current Procedural Terminology(CPT) and International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD-9,10) coding.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2017, a total of 3,350 elective, primary ACDA cases were performed. During this time, 69 patients had a revision surgery requiring the removal of ACDA. The most common reasons for revision surgery included cervical spondylosis(59.4%) and mechanical complications(27.5%). After removal of ACDA, common procedures performed included anterior cervical fusion with or without decompression(69.6%), combined anterior/posterior fusion/decompression (11.6%), and replacement of ACDA (7.2%). The indications for surgery did not vary significantly among the different procedures performed (p = 0.318). Patients requiring revision surgery for mechanical complications or those who underwent a combined surgical approach were at significantly higher risk for subsequent short-term complications (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Over a 10-year period, the rate of revision surgery for ACDA was low (2.1%). Nearly 90% of revision cases were due to either cervical spondylosis or mechanical complications. These indications for surgery did not vary significantly among the different procedures performed. These findings will be important during the shared-decision making process for patients undergoing primary or revision ACDA.

Factors Associated with Postoperative Rehospitalization in Patients with Cervical Disc Herniation

Cervical disc herniation (CDH) is a prevalent disease because of the poor living habits of and great pressure in modern society. Patients experience hand numbness, neck stiffness, soreness, and weakness due to neck nerve root compression, which leads to a gradual increase of neurosurgery outpatients. Although poor posture by the overuse of computers is possibly the origin of CDH, analysis of related factors causing the rehospitalization for CDH patients after surgery in Taiwan is not commonly reported. Thus, the present study focused on the demographics and surgery-related treatment on the relevance of rehospitalization for CDH patients after surgery. The design of the study was retrospective, and we collected data by medical record review, which was derived from the inpatient surgery data of patients at a medical center in southern Taiwan. The study lasted two years from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2018, and a total of 248 patients underwent surgery for intervertebral disc protrusion in the neck. The retrospective study adopted narrative statistics, the chi-squared test, and binary logistic regression analysis to identify factors affecting postoperative rehospitalization. Among 248 postoperative patients with intervertebral disc protrusion, 178 underwent cervical fusion surgery, and 32 were rehospitalized after surgery for one-year follow up, accounting for an overall prevalence rate of 12.9%. There were no significant differences in sex, age, occupation, hypertension, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, artificial disc replacement, hybrid surgery, and postoperative cervical coil use (p > 0.05). The results of binary logistic regression analysis showed statistically significant differences in abnormal body mass index (p = 0.0187, 95% CI = 1.238-10.499), diabetes (p = 0.0137, 95% CI = 1.288-9.224) and cervical vertebral surgery hospital days (p = 0.0004, 95% CI = 1.028-1.102), predicting the outcome of rehospitalization for CDH patients after surgery. The above results showed that abnormal body mass index, diabetes, and cervical vertebral surgery hospitalization days impacted rehospitalization in CDH patients after surgery. Thus, to prevent diabetes, weight control must be monitored, and maintaining correct posture can reduce CDH and decrease the rate of rehospitalization after surgery, which provides a critical reference for hospital managers and clinical staff.

What is a better value for your time? Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty

Introduction

Compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), the motion preservation of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) provides an attractive alternative with similar short-term results. However, there is a paucity of the economics of performing CDA over ACDF.

Study Design:

This was retrospective study.

Objective:

The objective of this study is to evaluate relative-value-units (RVUs), operative time, and RVUs-per-minute between single-level ACDF and CDA. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, reoperation, and morbidity.

Methods:

Adults who underwent ACDF or CDA in 2011–2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database datasets. Multivariate quantile regression was utilized.

Results:

There were 26,595 patients (2024 CDA). ACDF patients were older, more likely to be female, discharged to inpatient rehabilitation, and have a history of obesity, smoking, diabetes, steroid use, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists-class ≥3. ACDF had greater median RVUs-per-case (41.2 vs. 24.1) and RVUs-per-minute (0.36 vs. 0.27), despite greater operative-time (109 min vs. 92 min) (P < 0.001). ACDF predicted a 16.9 unit increase in median RVUs per case (P < 0.001, confidence interval [CI]⁹⁵: 16.3–17.5), an 8.81 min increase in median operative time per case (P < 0.001, CI⁹⁵: 5.69–11.9), and 0.119 unit increase in median RVUs-per-minute (P < 0.001, CI⁹⁵: 0.108–0.130). ACDF was associated with greater unadjusted rates of readmission (3.2% vs. 1.4%) morbidity (2.3% vs. 1.1%) (P < 0.001), but similar rates of reoperation (1.3% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.080). After adjusting for significant patient-related and procedural factors, readmission (odds ratio [OR] = 0.695, P = 0.130, CI⁹⁵: 0.434–1.113) and morbidity (OR = 1.102, P = 0.688, CI⁹⁵: 0.685–1.773) was similar between ACDF and CDA.

Conclusions:

Median RVUs-per-minute increased by 0.119 points for ACDF over CDA, or $257.7/h for each additional-hour of surgery. Adjusted 30-day outcomes were similar between procedures. Reimbursement for CDA does not appear to be in line with ACDF and may be a barrier to widespread usage.

IDENTIFICATION OF RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH 30-DAY READMISSION OF PATIENTS SUBMITTED TO ANTERIOR OR POSTERIOR ACCESS CERVICAL SPINE SURGERY

ABSTRACT Aim: To conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify risk factors associated with 30-day readmission of patients submitted to anterior or posterior access cervical spine surgery. Methods: The databases used to select the papers were PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane, using the following search strategy: patient AND readmission AND (30 day OR “thirty day” OR 30-day OR thirty-day) AND (spine AND cervical). Results: Initially, 179 papers that satisfied the established search stringwere selected. After reading the titles and abstracts, 46 were excluded from the sample for not effectively discussing the theme proposed for this review. Of the 133 remaining papers, 109 were also excluded after a detailed reading of their content, leaving 24 that were included in the sample for the meta-analysis. Conclusions: The average readmission rate in the studies evaluated was 4.85%. Only the occurrence of infections, as well as the presence of patients classified by the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) assessment system with scores greater than III, were causal factors that influenced the readmission of patients. No significant differences were noted when comparing the anterior and posterior surgical access routes. Level of evidence II; Systematic Review of Level II or Level I Studies with discrepant results.

National Rates, Reasons, and Risk Factors for 30- and 90-Day Readmission and Reoperation Among Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: An Analysis Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD).

OBJECTIVE

To determine causes of and independent risk factors for 30- and 90-day readmission in a cohort of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Identifying populations at high-risk of 30-day readmission is a priority in healthcare reform so as to reduce cost and patient morbidity. However, among patients undergoing ACDF, nationally-representative data have been limited, and have seldom described 90-day readmissions, early reoperation, or socioeconomic influences.

METHODS

We queried the NRD, which longitudinally tracks 49.3% of hospitalizations, for all adult patients undergoing ACDF. We calculated the rates of, and determined reasons for, readmission and reoperation at 30 and 90 days, and determined risk factors for readmission at each timepoint.

RESULTS

We identified 50,126 patients between January and September 2014. Of these, 2294 (4.6%) and 4152 (8.3%) were readmitted within 30 and 90 days of discharge, respectively, and were most commonly readmitted for infections, medical complications, and dysphagia. The characteristics most strongly associated with readmission were Medicare or Medicaid insurance, length of stay greater than or equal to 4 days, three or more comorbidities, and non-routine discharge, whereas surgical factors (e.g., greater number of vertebrae fused) were more modest. By 30 and 90 days, 8.2% and 11.7% of readmitted patients underwent an additional spinal procedure, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis uses the NRD to thoroughly characterize readmission in the general ACDF population. Readmissions are often delayed (after 30 days), strongly associated with insurance status, and many result in reoperation. Our results are crucial for risk-stratifying future ACDF patients and developing interventions to reduce readmission.Level of Evidence: 3.

Cervical Total Disc Replacement: Novel Devices

This article reviews the available literature for novel cervical total disc replacement devices, including ones which are available inside and outside of the United States. It includes biomechanical consideration as well as design characteristics and clinical data when available.

Comparing Predictors of Complications After Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion, Total Disk Arthroplasty, and Combined Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion-Total Disk Arthroplasty With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

INTRODUCTION

Outcomes after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical total disk arthroplasty (TDA) are satisfactory, but related morbidity and revision surgery rates are notable. This study sought to determine complication variations among ACDF, TDA, and combined ACDF-TDA as well as predictors of postoperative complications.

METHODS

Patients undergoing 1- to 2-level ACDF and/or TDA with at least a 2-year follow-up from 2009 to 2011 were identified from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Patient demographics, hospital-related parameters, mortality, and postoperative outcomes were compared, and their predictors were identified using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 16,510 and 449 individuals underwent ACDF and cervical TDA, respectively, and 201 underwent ACDF-TDA. ACDF-TDA patients had the highest rates of cardiac complications and pulmonary embolism (PE) (P ≤ 0.006), whereas TDA patients had higher individual surgical and device/implant/internal fixation complications (P ≤ 0.025). ACDF-TDA patients experienced the lowest rate of revisions. Cervical TDA increased the odds of any surgical complications (OR = 2.5, P = 0.002), overall complications (OR = 1.57, P = 0.034), and revisions (OR = 2.29, P < 0.001). Deyo index predicted any medical/surgical complications (OR = 1.43 and 1.19, respectively). Female sex was associated with increased odds of readmission (OR 1.30, P < 0.001) but was protective against medical complications (OR = 0.81, P = 0.013).

DISCUSSION

Combined ACDF-TDA procedures were not associated with increases in 2-year individual or overall complications, readmissions, or revisions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3-Therapeutic study.

Factors Associated With Extended Length of Stay and 90-Day Readmission Rates Following ACDF

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective.

OBJECTIVE

Identify patient risk factors for extended length of stay (LOS) and 90-day hospital readmissions following elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

Included ACDF patients from 2013 to 2017 at a single institution. Eligible patients were subset into LOS <2 and LOS ≥2 days, and no 90-day hospital readmission and yes 90-day hospital readmission. Patient and surgical factors were compared between the LOS and readmission groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was utilized to determine the association of independent factors with LOS and 90-day readmission rates.

RESULTS

Our sample included 1896 patients; 265 (14%) had LOS ≥2 days, and 121 (6.4%) had a readmission within 90 days of surgery. Patient and surgical factors associated with LOS included patient age ≥65 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-2.56), marriage (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.79), private health insurance (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15-0.50), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.12-1.86), African American race (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.38-2.72), and harvesting iliac crest autograft (OR 4.94, 95% CI 2.31-10.8). Patient and surgical factors associated with 90-day hospital readmission included ASA score (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.32-2.49), length of surgery (OR 1.002, 95% CI 1.001-1.004), and radiculopathy as indication for surgery (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Extended LOS and 90-day hospital readmissions may lead to poorer patient outcomes and increased episode of care costs. Our study identified patient and surgical factors associated with extended LOS and 90-day readmission rates. In general, preoperative patient factors affected these outcomes more than surgical factors.

Financial Aspects of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review of Recent Literature

Recently, there has been significant interest in understanding the cost-effectiveness of treatments in spine surgery as health care systems in the United States move toward value-based care and alternative payment models. Previous studies have shown comparable outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and anterior cervical discectomy fusion; however, there is a lack of consensus on the cost-effectiveness of CDA to support full adoption. Evidence of the limitations of these cost-analysis studies also exists in the literature, including industry funding, potential selection bias, and varying methods of calculating value. The goal of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the cost-effectiveness of CDA compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, and potential limitations with cost-analysis studies in spine surgery.

Cervical Disc Replacement: Trends, Costs, and Complications

Study Design

Retrospective review of insurance database.

Purpose

To investigate national trends, complications, and costs after cervical disc replacement (CDR) using an administrative insurance database representative of the United States population.

Overview of Literature

As CDR continues to be used to treat patients with cervical stenosis, it is important to gain a better understanding of its use on a national level, potential complications, and cost. This information will allow for optimal patient counseling, risk stratification, and healthcare cost assessments. Several prior studies have investigated complications associated with CDR, but they have been limited by small sample size, single institution experiences, limited follow-up, and potential conflicts of interest.

Methods

Patients who underwent single or multilevel CDR between 2007 and 2015 were identified using an insurance database. We collected data on annual trends, reimbursement costs, patient demographic information, hospital information, and information on complications from the time of operation to 1 year postoperative.

Results

Total of 293 patients underwent either single or multilevel CDR. The number of procedures increased nonlinearly over time at an average of 17% per year, with a greater increase seen in the outpatient setting. Less than 3.7% of patients had new onset pain within 1 year after CDR. Within 1 year, 12.3% of patients reported a mechanical and/or bone-related complication. There were no patients who indicated a new nerve injury within 6 months of follow-up. Less than 3.7% of patients presented with dysphagia or dysphonia within 6 months, infection within 3 months, or a revision or reoperation within 1 year. Average reimbursement for single-level inpatient versus outpatient CDR was US $33,696.28 and US $34,675.12, respectively (p=0.29).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the use of CDR continued to increase. The most common complication was mechanical and/or bone-related, and cost analysis demonstrated no significant difference between inpatient and outpatient CDR.

Trends in National Use of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion from 2006 to 2016

OBJECTIVE

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the most common procedure for the treatment of degenerative cervical conditions. The objective of this study is to determine time-dependent trends in patient outcomes following ACDF for degenerative disease from 2006 to 2016.

METHODS

We used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database to retrospectively review all patients who underwent elective ACDF between 2006 and 2016. A descriptive statistical analysis followed by time trend analysis was performed on demographics, comorbidities, perioperative, and outcome variables. Primary outcomes were reoperation and readmission rates. Secondary outcomes were medical and surgical complications reported within 30 days of operation.

RESULTS

A total of 36,854 patients underwent elective ACDF from the 2006 to 2016 NSQIP database. Mean age increased from 48.19 years [standard error: 1.49] in 2006 to 54.08 years [standard error: 0.12] in 2016 (P < 0.001). There was a significantly greater number of outpatient procedures from 2012 to 2016 (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists classes 3/4 significantly increased over time (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.005, respectively). Readmission risk, first documented in NSQIP in 2011, increased over time from 2011 to 2016 (P < 0.001). Unplanned reoperations have remained consistent at about 1.4%. Postoperative complications varied over time with no discernable patterns or trends.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the establishment of the NSQIP database, there have been no considerable improvements in reoperation or postoperative complication rates based on available data, however, there have been increased rates of readmission. Changes in data collection and an aging patient population with greater burden of comorbidities could confound these trends.

Drivers of Variability in 90-Day Cost for Elective Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disease

BACKGROUND

Value-based episode of care reimbursement models is being investigated to curb unsustainable health care costs. Any variation in the cost of index spine surgery can affect the payment bundling during the 90-d global period.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the drivers of variability in cost for patients undergoing elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical spine disease.

METHODS

Four hundred forty-five patients undergoing elective ACDF for cervical spine degenerative diagnoses were included in the study. The direct 90-d cost was derived as sum of cost of surgery, cost associated with postdischarge utilization. Multiple variable linear regression models were built for total 90-d cost.

RESULTS

The mean 90-d direct cost was $17685 ± $5731. In a multiple variable linear regression model, the length of surgery, number of levels involved, length of hospital stay, preoperative history of anticoagulation medication, health-care resource utilization including number of imaging, any complications and readmission encounter were the significant contributor to the 90-d cost. The model performance as measured by R2 was 0.616.

CONCLUSION

There was considerable variation in total 90-d cost for elective ACDF surgery. Our model can explain about 62% of these variations in 90-d cost. The episode of care reimbursement models needs to take into account these variations and be inclusive of the factors that drive the variation in cost to develop a sustainable payment model. The generalized applicability should take in to account the differences in patient population, surgeons' and institution-specific differences.

Patient Factors Affecting Emergency Department Utilization and Hospital Readmission Rates After Primary Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Review of 41,813 cases

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To identify preoperative risk factors for emergency department (ED) visit and unplanned hospital readmission after primary anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) at 30 and 90 days.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Limited data exist to identify factors associated with ED visit or readmission after primary ACDF within the first 3 months following surgery.

METHODS

Patients undergoing ACDF from 2005 to 2012 were identified in the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Multivariable regression models were created based on patient-level and surgical characteristics to identify independent risk factors for hospital revisit.

RESULTS

Of 41,813 patients identified, 2514 (6.0%) returned to the ED within 30 days of discharge. Risk factors included age < 35, black race (OR 1.19), Charlson Comorbidity index score > 1, length of stay (LOS) greater than 1 day (OR 1.23), and fusion of > 2 levels (OR 1.17). Four thousand six hundred nine (11.0%) patients returned to the ED within 90 days. Risk factors mirrored those at 30 days. Patients having private insurance or those discharged to rehab were less likely to present to the ED. One thousand three hundred ninety-four (3.3%) patients were readmitted by 30 days. Risk factors included male sex, Medicare, or Medicaid insurance (OR 1.71 and 1.79 respectively), Charlson comorbidity index > 1, discharge to a skilled nursing facility (OR 2.90), infectious/pathologic (OR 3.296), or traumatic (OR 1.409) surgical indication, LOS > 1 day (OR 1.66), or in-hospital complication. 2223 (5.3%) patients were readmitted by 90 days. Risk factors mirrored those at 30 days. No differences in readmission were seen based on race or number of levels fused. Patients aged 18 to 34 were less likely to be readmitted versus patients older than 35.

CONCLUSION

Insurance status, comorbidities, and LOS consistently predicted an unplanned hospital visit at 30 and 90 days. Although nondegenerative surgical indications and in-hospital complications did not predict ED visits, these factors increased the risk for readmission.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Reporting Methodology of Neurosurgical Studies Utilizing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

BACKGROUND

Use of large databases such as the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) has become increasingly common in neurosurgical research.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a critical appraisal and evaluation of the methodological reporting for studies in neurosurgical literature that utilize the ACS-NSQIP database.

METHODS

We queried Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases for all neurosurgical studies utilizing the ACS-NSQIP. We assessed each study according to number of criteria fulfilled with respect to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement, REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected Health Data (RECORD) Statement, and Journal of American Medical Association–Surgical Section (JAMA-Surgery) Checklist. A separate analysis was conducted among papers published in core and noncore journals in neurosurgery according to Bradford's law.

RESULTS

A total of 117 studies were included. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) scores for number of fulfilled criteria for STROBE Statement, RECORD Statement, and JAMA-Surgery Checklist were 20 (IQR:19-21), 9 (IQR:8-9), and 6 (IQR:5-6), respectively. For STROBE Statement, RECORD Statement, and JAMA-Surgery Checklist, item 9 (potential sources of bias), item 13 (supplemental information), and item 9 (missing data/sensitivity analysis) had the highest number of studies with no fulfillment among all studies (56, 68, 50%), respectively. When comparing core journals vs noncore journals, no significant difference was found (STROBE, P = .94; RECORD, P = .24; JAMA-Surgery checklist, P = .60).

CONCLUSION

While we observed an overall satisfactory reporting of methodology, most studies lacked mention of potential sources of bias, data cleaning methods, supplemental information, and external validity. Given the pervasive role of national databases and registries for research and health care policy, the surgical community needs to ensure the credibility and quality of such studies that ultimately aim to improve the value of surgical care delivery to patients.

30- and 90-Day Unplanned Readmission Rates, Causes, and Risk Factors After Cervical Fusion: A Single-Institution Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study OBJECTIVE.: To study 30- and 90-day readmission rates, causes, and risk factors after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior cervical fusion (PCF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Existing data on readmission after cervical fusion is majorly derived from national databases. Given their inherent limitations in accuracy, follow-up available, and missing data, we intend to add to literature from our institutional analysis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ACDF and PCF for degenerative cervical pathology in 2013 and 2014 were identified for the study. Comprehensive chart review was performed to record demographics and clinical patient profile. Hospital readmission within 30 and 90 days was identified, and the causes and management were recorded. Binary logistic regression analysis was done to study risk factors for readmission. ACDF and PCF were studied separately.

RESULTS

Our analysis included a total of 549 patients, stratified as 389 ACDFs and 160 PCFs. The 30- and 90-day unplanned readmission rate was 5.1% and 7.7% after ACDF. These rates were 11.2% and 16.9% after PCF. The most common cause of readmission was systemic infection and sepsis after ACDF and PCF (31.4% and 25.8% of readmitted, respectively), followed by pulmonary complications after ACDF (14.3% of readmitted) and wound complications after PCF (19.4% of readmitted). Predictors of readmission after ACDF included heart failure, history of malignancy, history of deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, and any intraoperative complication. In the PCF cohort, history of ischemic heart disease, increasing number of fusion levels and longer length of stay were independently predictive.

CONCLUSION

The rates, causes, and risk factors of readmission after ACDF and PCF have been identified. There is variation in published data regarding the incidence and risk factors for readmission after cervical fusion; however, majority of readmissions occur due to medical complications and systemic infection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Adverse events and their risk factors 90 days after cervical spine surgery: analysis from the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative

OBJECTIVE

The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) is a statewide, multicenter quality improvement initiative. Using MSSIC data, the authors sought to identify 90-day adverse events and their associated risk factors (RFs) after cervical spine surgery.

METHODS

A total of 8236 cervical spine surgery cases were analyzed. Multivariable generalized estimating equation regression models were constructed to identify RFs for adverse events; variables tested included age, sex, diabetes mellitus, disc herniation, foraminal stenosis, central stenosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Classification System (ASA) class > II, myelopathy, private insurance, anterior versus posterior approach, revision procedures, number of surgical levels, length of procedure, blood loss, preoperative ambulation, ambulation day of surgery, length of hospital stay, and discharge disposition.

RESULTS

Ninety days after cervical spine surgery, adverse events identified included radicular findings (11.6%), readmission (7.7%), dysphagia requiring dietary modification (feeding tube or nothing by mouth [NPO]) (6.4%), urinary retention (4.7%), urinary tract infection (2.2%), surgical site hematoma (1.1%), surgical site infection (0.9%), deep vein thrombosis (0.7%), pulmonary embolism (0.5%), neurogenic bowel/bladder (0.4%), myelopathy (0.4%), myocardial infarction (0.4%), wound dehiscence (0.2%), claudication (0.2%), and ileus (0.2%). RFs for dysphagia included anterior approach (p < 0.001), fusion procedures (p = 0.030), multiple-level surgery when considering anterior procedures only (p = 0.037), and surgery duration (p = 0.002). RFs for readmission included ASA class > II (p < 0.001), while preoperative ambulation (p = 0.001) and private insurance (p < 0.001) were protective. RFs for urinary retention included increasing age (p < 0.001) and male sex (p < 0.001), while anterior-approach surgery (p < 0.001), preoperative ambulation (p = 0.001), and ambulation day of surgery (p = 0.001) were protective. Preoperative ambulation (p = 0.010) and anterior approach (p = 0.002) were protective of radicular findings.

CONCLUSIONS

A multivariate analysis from a large, multicenter, prospective database identified the common adverse events after cervical spine surgery, along with their associated RFs. This information can lead to more informed surgeons and patients. The authors found that early mobilization after cervical spine surgery has the potential to significantly decrease adverse events.

Risk Factors for Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This was a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Specifically, we evaluated: (1) demographic risk factors; (2) comorbid risk factors; (3) indications for surgery; and (4) lengths of stay.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

CSF leak is a rare but serious complication of ACDF. Currently, there is a paucity of literature describing the risk factors for CSF leak following ACDF.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify all patients who underwent cervical fusion using the anterior approach with excision of intervertebral disc between 1998 and 2010. Patients who had a diagnosis of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical region were excluded. All patients who had a CSF leak were identified. Demographics and comorbidities were compared via χ analysis, and logistic regression to calculate the odds of having a CSF leak.

RESULTS

Of the 1,261,140 patients identified, 3048 patients (0.24%) had a postoperative CSF leak. Patients who were between the ages of 55 and 69 years (P=0.038) and 70 years or older (P=0.001) were at an increased risk of CSF leak compared with patients who were aged 40-54 years. Non-white race (P=0.021), obesity, (P<0.001) and hypertension (P=0.025) were associated with an increased risk of CSF leak, but diabetes (P=0.966) and hyperlipidemia (P=0.226) were not. Herniated disc diagnosis was associated with decreased risk of CSF leak (P=0.032), but cervical spondylosis with myelopathy patients had an increased risk (P<0.001). Patients with CSF leak had a mean length of stay of 6.0 days compared with 2.1 days among controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical candidates who are older and non-white should be counseled of their increased risk for CSF leak in preoperative planning. Patients who are obese and have hypertension may benefit from medical optimization before surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Age Stratification of 30-Day Postoperative Outcomes Following Excisional Laminectomy for Extradural Cervical and Thoracic Tumors

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate age as an independent predictive factor for perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgical decompression for metastatic cervical and thoracic spinal tumors using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2011 to 2014.

METHODS

We identified 1673 adult patients undergoing excisional laminectomy of cervical and thoracic extradural tumors. Patients were stratified into quartiles based on age, with Q1 including patients aged 18 to 49 years, Q2 including patients aged 50 to 60 years, Q3 including patients aged 61 to 69 years, and Q4 including patients ≥70 years. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to examine the association between age and 30-day perioperative morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Age was an independent risk factor for 30-day venous thromboembolism (VTE) and reoperation. Patients in Q3 for age had nearly a 4 times increased risk of VTE than patients in Q1 (odds ratio [OR] 3.97; 95% CI 1.91-8.25; P < .001). However, there was no significant difference in VTE between patients in Q4 and Q1 (P = .069). Patients in Q2 (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.06-3.74; P = .032) and Q4 (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.06-4.52; P = .036) for age had a 2 times increased risk of reoperation compared with patients in Q1.

CONCLUSIONS

Age was an independent predictive factor for perioperative VTE and reoperation, but there was no clear age-dependent relationship between increasing age and the risk of these perioperative complications.

Postoperative Emergency Department Utilization and Hospital Readmission After Cervical Spine Arthrodesis: Rates, Trends, Causes, and Risk Factors

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective state database analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the 30- and 90-day emergency department (ED) utilization and inpatient readmission rates after primary cervical arthrodesis, to stratify these findings by surgical approach, and to describe risk factors and conditions precipitating these events.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Limited data exist on ED utilization and hospital readmission rates after cervical spine arthrodesis.

METHODS

The New York State all-payer health-care database was queried to identify all 87,045 patients who underwent primary subaxial cervical arthrodesis from 1997 through 2012. Demographic data and clinical information were extracted. Readmission data were available for the entire study period, whereas ED utilization data collection began later and was therefore analyzed starting in 2005. Incidences of these events within 30 and 90 days of discharge as well as trends over time were tabulated. The conditions prompting these encounters were also collected. Data were analyzed with respect to surgical approach.

RESULTS

The hospital readmission rate was 4.2% at 30 days and 6.2% at 90 days postoperatively. Approximately 6.2% of patients were managed in the ED without inpatient admission within 30 days and 11.3% within 90 days of surgery. The most common conditions prompting such events were dysphagia or dysphonia, respiratory complications, and infection. ED utilization and readmission rates were lowest after anterior surgeries. A preoperative Charlson Comorbidity Index of 1 or greater and traumatic pathologies were associated with increased risk of subsequent ED utilization or hospital readmission. Thirty-day hospital readmission rates declined after 2010, whereas 30-day ED utilization continued to increase.

CONCLUSION

Patient comorbidities, traumatic pathologies, and surgical approach are associated with increased postoperative complications. Anterior procedures carry the lowest risk, followed by posterior and then circumferential. Awareness of these findings should help to encourage development of strategies to minimize the rate of postoperative ED utilization and hospital readmission.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Impact of body mass index on 30-day outcomes after spinopelvic fixation surgery

Background:

Obesity is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases associated with degenerative spinal disease. There is limited evidence regarding the short-term outcome of patients with elevated BMI following spinopelvic fixation surgery.

Methods:

We used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database from 2013 to 2014. Inclusion criteria included: adults, aged 18 and older, who underwent all-cause spinopelvic fixation surgery. Primary outcome measures were 30-day readmission, reoperation, and major complication rates. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effect of elevated body mass index (BMI) on 30-day outcome.

Results:

A total of 618 patients met inclusion criteria stratified into levels of BMI: 11.2% were Class 2 obese and 10.3% were Class 3 obese. Significant differences were found between the classes for the incidence of revision surgery, reoperations, and deep wound infections. However, there were no significant increases in readmissions and major complications rates, and only Class 3 obese patients had significantly higher odds of reoperation than those who were not obese.

Conclusion:

Significant differences between all classes of obesity regarding revision surgery, reoperation, and deep wound infection rates were found. Class 3 obese patients had significantly higher odds of reoperation, most likely attributed to the greater number/severity of preoperative comorbidities.