Eosinophilic meningitis triggered by implanted Gliadel wafers: case report

An injectable biomimetic hydrogel adapting brain tissue mechanical strength for postoperative treatment of glioblastoma without anti-tumor drugs participation

Adapting the mechanical strength between the implant materials and the brain tissue is crucial for the postoperative treatment of glioblastoma. However, no related study has been reported. Herein, we report an injectable lipoic acid‑iron (LA-Fe) hydrogel (LFH) that can adapt to the mechanical strength of various brain tissues, including human brain tissue, by coordinating Fe3+ into a hybrid hydrogel of LA and its sodium salt (LANa). When LFH, which matches the mechanical properties of mouse brain tissue (337 ± 8.06 Pa), was injected into the brain resection cavity, the water content of the brain tissue was maintained at a normal level (77%). Similarly, LFH did not induce the activation or hypertrophy of glial astrocytes, effectively preventing brain edema and scar hyperplasia. Notably, LFH spontaneously degrades in the interstitial fluid, releasing LA and Fe3+ into tumor cells. The redox couples LA/DHLA (dihydrolipoic acid, reduction form of LA in cells) and Fe3+/Fe2+ would regenerate each other to continuously provide ROS to induce ferroptosis and activate immunogenic cell death. As loaded the anti-PDL1, anti-PDL1@LFH further enhanced the efficacy of tumor-immunotherapy and promoted tumor ferroptosis. The injectable hydrogel that adapted the mechanical strength of tissues shed a new light for the tumor postoperative treatment.

Unmanageable Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage With Eosinophilic Meningitis in a Gliadel Wafer Implant Patient

Gliadel wafer implants (Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA) have shown their efficacy in prolonging survival in patients with malignant gliomas. The safety of Gliadel wafers has also been reported; however, there is a certain risk of adverse events. We present a rare case of refractory cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage with eosinophilic meningitis in a patient with glioblastoma who underwent tumor resection with Gliadel wafer implants. A 60-year-old man presented with a glioblastoma in the right temporal lobe. The patient underwent tumor resection with Gliadel wafer implants. During the postoperative course, the patient presented with intractable CSF leakage and the development of a pseudomeningocele. A delayed rise in blood and CSF eosinophil count (a few weeks after the primary operation) and positive drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) results against the Gliadel wafer led to the diagnosis of an allergic reaction to these implants. Removal of the Gliadel wafers resolved the eosinophilic reaction; however, the patient subsequently required a shunt procedure for persistent hydrocephalus. This case highlights the importance of investigating rare causes of refractory CSF leakage and hydrocephalus due to allergic reactions to Gliadel wafers. Delayed elevations of eosinophils in blood and CSF tests may lead to a diagnosis of eosinophilic meningitis. DLST against Gliadel wafers is also useful for diagnosis when it is available. To control the hydrocephalus, not only the shunt procedure but also wafer removal must be considered; however, patients with limited life expectancy are generally hesitant to undergo such additional procedures.

The clinical significance of radiological changes associated with gliadel implantation in patients with recurrent high grade glioma

Gliadel occasionally induces edema following its implantation. We aimed to correlate such post-surgical radiological changes to its efficacy and subsequent survival. Fifty-six patients with recurrent high grade glioma were treated between 2005 and 2016 with Gliadel implantation. Volumetric measurements of MRI features, including FLAIR abnormalities, tumor bulk (volume of gadolinium enhancement on T1) and resection cavity volumes over time were conducted. To assess dynamics over time, linear regression trendlines for each of these were calculated and examined to correlate with survival. Median follow-up after resection was 21.5 months. Median survival post-Gliadel implantation and overall survival since diagnosis were 12 months and 22 months, respectively. A subgroup of patients (n = 6) with a transient increase in FLAIR changes volume over time survived significantly longer post-Gliadel compared to those who did not demonstrate such change (36 vs 12 months, p = .03). Positive trends, representing overall growth in volume over time, of tumor bulk and resection cavity predicted survival in multivariate analyses (hazard ratios 7.9 and 84, p = .003 and .002, respectively). Increase in tumor bulk and resection cavity over time were associated with decreased survival, while transient FLAIR increase was a favorable prognostic factor. This may represent a transient inflammatory process in the tumor, possibly stemming from a presumed immune-mediated anti-tumor response.

A multicenter randomized phase III study for newly diagnosed maximally resected glioblastoma comparing carmustine wafer implantation followed by chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide with chemoradiotherapy alone; Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1703 (MACS study)

A randomized phase III trial in Japan commenced in June 2019. The present standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma is maximal resection followed by chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide. The purpose of this study is to confirm the superiority of maximal resection with carmustine wafer implantation followed by chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide over the standard maximal resection followed by chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide in terms of overall survival for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. A total of 250 patients will be accrued from 35 Japanese institutions in 5.5 years. Patients with >90% surgical resection will be registered and randomly assigned to each group with 1:1 allocation. The primary endpoint is overall survival and the secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, loco-regional progression-free survival and incidence of adverse events. This trial has been registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trial, as jRCT1031190035 [https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT1031190035].

The Extracellular Matrix and Biocompatible Materials in Glioblastoma Treatment

During cancer genesis, the extracellular matrix (ECM) in the human brain undergoes important transformations, starting to resemble embryonic brain cell milieu with a much denser structure. However, the stiffness of the tumor ECM does not preclude cancer cells from migration. The importance of the ECM role in normal brain tissue as well as in tumor homeostasis has engaged much effort in trials to implement ECM as a target and an instrument in the treatment of brain cancers. This review provides a detailed analysis of both experimental and applied approaches in combined therapy for gliomas in adults. In general, matrix materials for glioma treatment should have properties facilitating the simplest delivery into the body. Hence, to deliver an artificial implant directly into the operation cavity it should be packed into a gel form, while for bloodstream injections matrix needs to be in the form of polymer micelles, nanoparticles, etc. Furthermore, the delivered material should mimic biomechanical properties of the native tissue, support vital functions, and slow down or stop the proliferation of surrounding cells for a prolonged period. The authors propose a two-step approach aimed, on the one hand, at elimination of remaining cancer cells and on the other hand, at restoring normal brain tissue. Thereby, the first bioartificial matrix to be applied should have relatively low elastic modulus should be loaded with anticancer drugs, while the second material with a higher elastic modulus for neurite outgrowth support should contain specific factors stimulating neuroregeneration.