1
|
Mariaux F, Elfering A, Fekete TF, Porchet F, Haschtmann D, Reitmeir R, Loibl M, Jeszenszky D, Kleinstück FS, Mannion AF. The use of the Core Yellow Flags Index for the assessment of psychosocial distress in patients undergoing surgery of the cervical spine. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024; 33:2269-2276. [PMID: 38642136 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08190-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychosocial distress (the presence of yellow flags) has been linked to poor outcomes in spine surgery. The Core Yellow Flags Index (CYFI), a short instrument assessing the 4 main yellow flags, was developed for use in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. This study evaluated its ability to predict outcome in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. METHODS Patients with degenerative spinal disorders (excluding myelopathy) operated in one centre, from 2015 to 2019, were asked to complete the CYFI at baseline and the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) at baseline and 3 and 12 months after surgery. The relationship between CYFI and COMI scores at baseline as well as the predictive ability of the CYFI on the COMI follow-up scores were tested using structural equation modelling. RESULTS From 731 eligible patients, 547 (61.0 ± 12.5 years; 57.2% female) completed forms at all three timepoints. On a cross-sectional basis, preoperative CYFI and COMI scores were highly correlated (β = 0.54, in men and 0.51 in women; each p < 0.001). CYFI added significantly and independently to the prediction of COMI at 3 months' FU in men (β = 0.36) and 12 months' FU in men and women (both β = 0.20) (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The CYFI had a low to moderate but significant and independent association with cervical spine surgery outcomes. Implementing the CYFI in the preoperative workup of these patients could help refine outcome predictions and better manage patient expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francine Mariaux
- Department of Teaching, Research and Development, Spine Centre Division, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Achim Elfering
- Institute for Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | - Markus Loibl
- Spine Centre, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Anne F Mannion
- Department of Teaching, Research and Development, Spine Centre Division, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heard JC, Lee Y, Ezeonu T, Lambrechts MJ, Narayanan R, Yeung C, Wright J, Paulik J, Purtill C, Mangan JJ, Kurd MF, Kaye ID, Canseco JA, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD, Kepler CK. Relating preoperative MCS-12 to microdiscectomy outcomes. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024; 33:2190-2197. [PMID: 38630247 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08090-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the impact of poor mental health on patient-reported and surgical outcomes after microdiscectomy. METHODS Patients ≥ 18 years who underwent a single-level lumbar microdiscectomy from 2014 to 2021 at a single academic institution were retrospectively identified. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were collected at preoperative, three-month, and one-year postoperative time points. PROMs included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale Back and Leg (VAS Back and VAS Leg, respectively), and the mental and physical component of the short form-12 survey (MCS and PCS). The minimum clinically important differences (MCID) were employed to compare scores for each PROM. Patients were categorized as having worse mental health or better mental health based on a MCS threshold of 50. RESULTS Of 210 patients identified, 128 (61%) patients had a preoperative MCS score ≤ 50. There was no difference in 90-day surgical readmissions or spine reoperations within one year. At 3- and 12-month time points, both groups demonstrated improvements in all PROMs (p < 0.05). At three months postoperatively, patients with worse mental health had significantly lower PCS (42.1 vs. 46.4, p = 0.004) and higher ODI (20.5 vs. 13.3, p = 0.006) scores. Lower mental health scores were associated with lower 12-month PCS scores (43.3 vs. 48.8, p < 0.001), but greater improvements in 12-month ODI (- 28.36 vs. - 18.55, p = 0.040). CONCLUSION While worse preoperative mental health was associated with lower baseline and postoperative PROMs, patients in both groups experienced similar improvements in PROMs. Rates of surgical readmissions and reoperations were similar among patients with varying preoperative mental health status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy C Heard
- Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5thFloor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Yunsoo Lee
- Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5thFloor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| | - Teeto Ezeonu
- Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5thFloor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Mark J Lambrechts
- Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5thFloor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Rajkishen Narayanan
- Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5thFloor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Caleb Yeung
- Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5thFloor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Justin Wright
- Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5thFloor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - John Paulik
- Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5thFloor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Caroline Purtill
- Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5thFloor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - John J Mangan
- Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5thFloor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Mark F Kurd
- Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5thFloor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Ian D Kaye
- Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5thFloor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Jose A Canseco
- Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5thFloor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Alan S Hilibrand
- Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5thFloor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Alexander R Vaccaro
- Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5thFloor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Gregory D Schroeder
- Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5thFloor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Christopher K Kepler
- Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5thFloor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Makanji H, Solomito MJ, Kostyun R, Esmende S. Influence of Anxiety and Depression on Opioid Use After Cervical Spine Fusion: An Analysis of a National Claims Database. Orthopedics 2024; 47:89-94. [PMID: 37757752 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20230922-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
Patients with spine pathology demonstrate an above average rate of active psychiatric disorders, which can influence their recovery. This study was designed to understand how mental health diagnoses (ie, anxiety and depression) influence a patient's postoperative need for opioids after a single level cervical spine fusion. The PearlDiver database was used to identify patients. Patients were placed into one of four groups: those with a diagnosis of depression, those with a diagnosis of anxiety, those with a diagnosis of both anxiety and depression, and a control group. Chi-square tests were used to assess differences in the number of patients filling initial and additional opioid prescriptions for up to 90 days after their fusion. A total of 168,967 patients who underwent an elective cervical spine fusion in the United States between 2010 and 2021 were included in this study. The control group filled significantly more opioid prescriptions within the first 90 days after their cervical fusion (P<.001). There was no difference among the study groups regarding the need to fill additional opioid prescriptions. Patients with a diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety may present as complex patients; however, results suggest they do not need additional opioids for pain control after a single level cervical spine fusion. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):89-94.].
Collapse
|
4
|
Lynch CP, Cha EDK, Jenkins NW, Parrish JM, Nolte MT, Geoghegan CE, Jadczak CN, Mohan S, Singh K. Influence of Preoperative Depressive Burden on Achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Difference Following Lumbar Decompression. Clin Spine Surg 2022; 35:E693-E697. [PMID: 35509017 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE This study evaluates the association of preoperative mental health with the rate of achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcomes following lumbar decompression (LD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Research is scarce regarding the influence of preoperative depression on the rate of achieving MCID for mental health, physical function, and pain among LD patients. METHODS A surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed for primary LD surgeries. Patients were grouped by depressive symptom severity according to the preoperative Patient Health Questionnaire 9 score. The association of Patient Health Questionnaire 9 subgroups with demographic and surgical variables was analyzed, and differences among subgroups were assessed. Achievement rates of MCID for physical function, pain, disability, and mental health were compared among groups at each time point using previously established MCID thresholds. RESULTS Of the 321 subjects, 69.8% were male, and 170 subjects had minimal preoperative depressive symptoms, 86 had moderate, and 65 had severe. Patients in moderate and severe groups demonstrated a significantly greater rate of MCID achievement for disability at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. The severe group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of achieving MCID for mental health at the 1-year time point. CONCLUSIONS Patients with any range of preoperative depressive symptom severity had a similar rate of achieving MCID for pain and physical function throughout 1 year following LD. The severe depressive symptom group had a higher rate of MCID achievement with disability at 6 weeks and with mental health at 1 year. This study demonstrates that patients with any preoperative depressive symptom severity have an indistinguishable ability to attain MCID by 1 year following LD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor P Lynch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hartman TJ, Nie JW, MacGregor KR, Oyetayo OO, Zheng E, Singh K. Workers compensation patients experiencing depression report meaningful improvement in mental health scores after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2022; 34:102020. [PMID: 36161064 PMCID: PMC9490096 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.102020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mental health has been demonstrated to affect postoperative outcomes. No prior literature has reported the relationship between preoperative mental health on outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the Workers Compensation (WC) population. Methods WC claimants who underwent primary ACDF were identified from a single-surgeon retrospective database. Patients were separated by SF-12 MCS score into Depressed (<45.6) or Not Depressed (ND) (≥45.6) cohorts. Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS PF), SF-12 Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), SF-12 MCS, visual analog scale (VAS) neck/arm pain, and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were collected and compared within and between groups. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates were compared between groups. Results Depressed patients had greater length of stay (p = 0.007) and postoperative narcotic consumption (p = 0.026). Depressed patients improved at 12-week to 2-year PROMIS PF, 6-month SF-12 PCS, 6-week to 6-month SF-12 MCS, 6-week to 6-month and 2-year VAS neck, all VAS arm, and 6-month NDI (p ≤ 0.045, all). ND patients improved at 12-week to 1-year PROMIS PF, 6-month to 2-year SF-12 PCS, 12-week to 1-year VAS neck, 6-week to 1-year VAS arm, and 12-week to 1-year NDI (p ≤ 0.044, all). Between groups, ND patients reported superior PROMIS PF, SF-12 MCS, VAS neck, VAS arm, and NDI scores at two or more periods (p ≤ 0.045, all). MCID achievement rate regarding SF-12 MCS was greater in the Depressed cohort at all postoperative points up to 1 year (p ≤ 0.020, all). Conclusion Depressed patients tended to have a greater length of stay and postoperative narcotic consumption immediately after surgery. Not depressed patients reported more favorable physical and mental function, pain, and disability scores preoperatively and postoperatively. Depressed patients reported greater MCID achievement in mental function following surgery. Depressed patients with WC have a greater likelihood of reporting tangible improvement in mental health scores following ACDF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J. Hartman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - James W. Nie
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Keith R. MacGregor
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Omolabake O. Oyetayo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Eileen Zheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ko S, Choi W. Usefulness of preoperative Short Form-36 Mental Component Score as a prognostic factor in patients who underwent decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30231. [PMID: 36181126 PMCID: PMC9524984 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Physical factors such as frequency of low back pain, sensory abnormalities in the lower extremities, smoking history before surgery, and preoperative mental health status as predictors of operative outcomes have been growing as areas of interest in the field of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). This study aimed to investigate the correlation between the preoperative Short Form-36 Mental Component Score (SF-36 MCS) and long-term prognosis after decompression surgery for DLSS. In total, 198 patients were enrolled in this study. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) were used to evaluate spinal functional outcomes. The SF-36 questionnaire was used and analyzed by classifying it into physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS). The SF-36 MCS was divided into role limitations caused by emotional problems, social functioning, vitality, and emotional well-being. In the correlation between preoperative MCS and ODI improvement, the r value was -0.595 (P < .05) at 12 months postoperatively. ODI improvement at 12 months after decompression surgery showed a statistically significant and strong negative correlation with preoperative MCS. In the correlation between preoperative MCS and RMDQ improvement, the r value was -0.544 (P < .05) at 12 months postoperatively. Therefore, RMDQ improvement 12 months after decompression surgery showed a strong negative correlation with preoperative MCS. Regarding the correlation between preoperative MCS and SF-36 PCS improvement, the r values were 0.321 (P < .05) at 6 months postoperatively and 0.343 (P < .05) at 12 months postoperatively. Therefore, SF-36 PCS improvement at 6 and 12 months after decompression surgery showed a strong positive correlation with preoperative SF-36 MCS scores. Preoperative SF-36 MCS is a factor that can predict the prognosis of patients who underwent decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis for at least 1 year postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangbong Ko
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Daegu Catholic University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
- *Correspondence: Sangbong Ko MD, PhD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Daegu Catholic University Hospital, 42472] 33, Duryugongwon-ro 17-gil, Nam-gu, Daegu, Korea (e-mail: )
| | - Wonkee Choi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Daegu Catholic University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Depression Increases Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Revision Rates and Diminishes Neck Disability Index Improvement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:1287-1294. [PMID: 35853173 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE To determine if depression and/or anxiety significantly affect patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Mental health diagnoses are receiving increased recognition for their influence of outcomes after spine surgery. The magnitude that mental health disorders contribute to patient-reported outcomes following PCDF requires increased awareness and understanding. MATERIALS AND METHODS A review of electronic medical records identified patients who underwent a PCDF at a single institution during the years 2013-2020. Patients were placed into either depression/anxiety or nondepression/anxiety group based on their medical history. A delta score (∆) was calculated for all PROMs by subtracting postoperative from preoperative scores. χ 2 tests and t tests were utilized to analyze categorical and continuous data, respectively. Regression analysis determined independent predictors of change in PROMs. Alpha was set at 0.05. RESULTS A total of 195 patients met inclusion criteria, with 60 (30.8%) having a prior diagnosis of depression/anxiety. The depression/anxiety group was younger (58.8 vs . 63.0, P =0.012), predominantly female (53.3% vs . 31.9%, P =0.007), and more frequently required revision surgery (11.7% vs . 0.74%, P =0.001). In addition, they had worse baseline mental component (MCS-12) (42.2 vs . 48.6, P <0.001), postoperative MCS-12 (46.5 vs . 52.9, P =0.002), postoperative neck disability index (NDI) (40.7 vs . 28.5, P =0.001), ∆NDI (-1.80 vs . -8.93, P =0.010), NDI minimum clinically important difference improvement (15.0% vs . 29.6%, P =0.046), and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Neck scores (3.63 vs . 2.48, P =0.018). Only the nondepression/anxiety group improved in MCS-12 ( P =0.002) and NDI ( P <0.001) postoperatively. Depression and/or anxiety was an independent predictor of decreased magnitude of NDI improvement on regression analysis (β=7.14, P =0.038). CONCLUSION Patients with history of depression or anxiety demonstrate less improvement in patient-reported outcomes and a higher revision rate after posterior cervical fusion, highlighting the importance of mental health on clinical outcomes after spine surgery.
Collapse
|
8
|
Patel MR, Jacob KC, Nie JW, Hartman TJ, Vanjani N, Pawlowski H, Prabhu M, Amin KS, Singh K. The Effect of the Preoperative Severity of Neck Pain on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. World Neurosurg 2022; 165:e337-e345. [PMID: 35718277 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.06.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates among patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with varying severity of preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) neck score. METHODS Patients with ACDF were grouped: severity of preoperative VAS neck score ≤8 or >8. Demographic/perioperative variables and PROMs (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function [PROMIS PF] score, 12-Item Short Form [SF-12] Mental Component Score [MCS], VAS neck/arm score, and Neck Disability Index [NDI]) were collected preoperatively/postoperatively. MCID attainment comparison by grouping was evaluated using χ2 analysis. RESULTS A total of 137 patients were included (103 VAS neck preoperative score ≤8; 34 VAS neck preoperative score >8). The VAS neck preoperative score ≤8 cohort did not improve: 6 weeks PROMIS-PF score, 6 weeks SF-12 Physical Component Score [PCS], 12 weeks/1 year/2 years SF-12 MCS, 2 years VAS neck score, and 1 years/2 years VAS arm score (P ≤ 0.015, all). VAS neck preoperative score >8 did not improve: 6 weeks/12 weeks/2 years PROMIS-PF score, all time points SF-12 PCS, 6 weeks/12 weeks/1 year/2 years SF-12 MCS, and 2 years VAS arm score (P ≤ 0.013, all). VAS neck preoperative score >8 had inferior PROMIS-PF scores all time points except 1 year (P ≤ 0.036, all), lower SF-12 PCS 6 weeks/6 months (P ≤ 0.043, both), inferior SF-12 MCS at preoperative to 6 months (P ≤ 006, all), higher VAS neck score from preoperative to 6 months (P ≤ 0.018), higher VAS arm score preoperative/12 weeks/6 months (P ≤ 0.020, all), and higher NDI at preoperative/12 weeks/6 months (P ≤ 0.030, all). MCID attainment rates for VAS neck preoperative score >8 were greater for NDI 2 years (P = 0.040), lower for PROMIS-PF score 2 years, and overall (P = 0.018), lower for SF-12 MCS 12 weeks (P = 0.046), lower for VAS neck score 12 weeks to 1 year and overall (P ≤ 0.032, all), and lower for VAS arm score 6 weeks/1 year (P ≤ 0.030, both). CONCLUSIONS Patients with single-level ACDF presenting with greater baseline neck pain showed poorer physical function/pain/disability/mental health at preoperative/intermediate postoperative time points, but had comparable long-term PROMs by 2 years. MCID attainment was lower among patients with greater preoperative neck pain; MCID among the VAS neck score >8 cohort were only significantly inferior for neck pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhav R Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kevin C Jacob
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - James W Nie
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Timothy J Hartman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nisheka Vanjani
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Hanna Pawlowski
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael Prabhu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kanhai S Amin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dual Role of Neck Disability Index in the Assessment of Quality of Life in Cervical Spine Patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:e789-e798. [PMID: 35191853 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-20-01192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a well-established measure for patients with cervical myelopathy, radiculopathy, or myeloradiculopathy. Few studies have examined the relationship between NDI and mental health outcomes after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF). Our study sets out to determine the possible correlations between NDI and mental health outcome measures after ACDF. METHODS A prospectively maintained surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed for elective ACDF procedures from December 2013 to December 2019. Demographic and perioperative characteristics were collected. Primary outcomes of interest were NDI, 12-Item Short Form Mental Component Summary (SF-12 MCS), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Outcomes were collected preoperatively and postoperatively (6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years). Postoperative improvement for all outcomes was evaluated using a paired Student t-test. Correlations between NDI and mental health outcomes were evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Strength of association was determined using the following criteria: weak (0.1 ≤ |r| < 0.3), moderate (0.3 ≤ |r| < 0.5), and strong (|r| ≥ 0.5). RESULTS A total of 225 patients were included in this study. Most of the patients underwent a single-level procedure and had a spinal pathology of herniated nucleus pulposus. NDI demonstrated significant improvements through 2 years compared with preoperative values (all P < 0.001). Similarly, SF-12 MCS and PHQ-9 significantly improved through 1-year postoperatively (all P ≤ 0.010) but was not maintained at 2 years (P = 0.835; P = 0.128). NDI demonstrated a significant but moderate correlation with SF-12 MCS at the preoperative time point, but a strong correlation was observed at all postoperative time points (all P ≤ 0.001). A significant and strong correlation between NDI and PHQ-9 was demonstrated at all time points (all P ≤ 0.002). DISCUSSION NDI demonstrated notable and strong correlations with mental health outcome measures at all postoperative time points. NDI is an effective measure to assess neck disability but may also help capture changes to mental health symptoms after ACDF.
Collapse
|
10
|
Parrish JM, Jenkins NW, Lynch CP, Cha EDK, Brundage TS, Hrynewycz NM, Singh K. Preoperative Physical Function Association With Mental Health Improvement After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Clin Spine Surg 2021; 34:E559-E565. [PMID: 34224424 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective study. OBJECTIVE This study investigates the influence of physical function and their influence on postoperative depressive symptom scores as measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) among anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) patients. BACKGROUND While ACDF is one of the most commonly performed ambulatory surgeries, research is limited on the predictive value of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores and their influence on depressive symptoms as measured by the PHQ-9. METHODS A prospectively maintained surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed from March 2016 to January 2019. Inclusion criteria were primary or revision ACDF procedures. Patients were grouped by preoperative PROMIS score (≥35.0, <35.0), with higher scores indicating greater physical function. The χ2 and Student t tests assessed categorical and continuous variables (eg, demographics, perioperative, and postoperative values). A t test evaluated postoperative improvement in PROMIS Physical Function (PF) scores between subgroups among PROMIS PF scores and PHQ-9 score improvement at 6, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. Linear regression assessed preoperative PROMIS scores influence on PHQ-9 score improvement. RESULTS The 121 subject cohort was 61.2% male with an average age of 49.6±9.8 years. Compared with the PROMIS ≥35.0 group, the PROMIS <35.0 group also had larger improvement of PROMIS scores at 6 weeks. No significant difference in postoperative PHQ-9 improvement was observed between subgroups. There was a negative association between preoperative PROMIS scores and improvement in PROMIS scores at 6, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. There was a positive association between preoperative PROMIS scores and magnitude of 1-year PHQ-9 change. CONCLUSIONS Individuals with lower preoperative PROMIS PF scores had significantly higher PHQ-9 scores at 1 year. Patients with lower preoperative physical function, as evaluated by PROMIS PF scoring, had greater improvement of mental health at 1 year postoperatively. This suggests that many patients experience multidimensional health benefits after ACDF procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Parrish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Owusu-Akyaw KA, Bido J, Warner T, Rodeo SA, Williams RJ. SF-36 Physical Component Score Is Predictive of Achieving a Clinically Meaningful Improvement after Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Femur. Cartilage 2021; 13:853S-859S. [PMID: 32940050 PMCID: PMC8808818 DOI: 10.1177/1947603520958132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is an increasingly common treatment for patients with symptomatic focal chondral lesions of the knee. There has been increasing interest in determining predictive factors to maximize patient benefit after this operation. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the predictive association of the physical component (PCS) and mental component (MCS) scores of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire for achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after OCA transplantation. METHODS This retrospective study of a longitudinally maintained institutional registry included 91 patients who had undergone OCA transplantation for symptomatic focal osteochondral lesions of the femoral condyle. Included patients were those with complete preoperative questionnaires for the SF-36 and IKDC and completed postoperative IKDC at 2-year follow-up. Multivariate analysis was performed evaluating predictive association of the preoperative MCS and PCS with achievement of the MCID for the IKDC questionnaire. RESULTS Logistic multivariate modeling demonstrated a statistically significant association between lower preoperative PCS and achievement of the MCID (P = 0.022). A defect diameter >2 cm was also associated with achievement of MCID (P = 0.049). Preoperative MCS did not demonstrate a significant association (P = 0.09) with achievement of the MCID. CONCLUSIONS For this cohort of 91 patients, the preoperative SF-36 PCS and lesion size were predictive of achievement of the MCID at 2-year follow-up after femoral OCA transplantation. These findings support an important role of baseline physical health scores for predicting which patients will obtain a meaningful clinical benefit from this surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kwadwo A. Owusu-Akyaw
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York,
NY, USA,Kwadwo A. Owusu-Akyaw, Hospital for Special
Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chen J, Li JY, Tian GH, Qiu RJ, Zhao XQ, Di XS, Yuan QM, Long SW, Ran Y, Jia YS, Shang HC. A national snapshot of the impact of clinical depression on post-surgical pain and adverse outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy: 10-year results from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0258517. [PMID: 34653189 PMCID: PMC8519476 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Depression is associated with poorer outcomes in a wide spectrum of surgeries but the specific effects of depression in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and impact of pre-surgical clinical depression on pain and other outcomes after surgery for cervical degenerative disc disease using a national representative database. Data of patients with cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy were extracted from the 2005–2014 US Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Included patients underwent anterior discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Acute or chronic post-surgical pain, postoperative complications, unfavorable discharge, length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs were evaluated. Totally 215,684 patients were included. Pre-surgical depression was found in 29,889 (13.86%) patients, with a prevalence nearly doubled during 2005–2014 in the US. Depression was independently associated with acute or chronic post-surgical pain (aOR: 1.432), unfavorable discharge (aOR: 1.311), prolonged LOS (aOR: 1.152), any complication (aOR: 1.232), respiratory complications/pneumonia (aOR: 1.153), dysphagia (aOR: 1.105), bleeding (aOR: 1.085), infection/sepsis (aOR: 1.529), and higher hospital costs (beta: 1080.640) compared to non-depression. No significant risk of delirium or venous thrombotic events was observed in patients with depression as compared to non-depression. Among patients receiving primary surgery, depression was independently associated with prolonged LOS (aOR: 1.150), any complication (aOR:1.233) and postoperative pain (aOR:1.927). In revision surgery, no significant associations were found for prolonged LOS, any complication or pain. In conclusion, in the US patients undergoing ACDF, pre-surgical clinical depression predicts post-surgical acute or chronic pain, a slightly prolonged LOS and the presence of any complication. Awareness of these associations may help clinicians stratify risk preoperatively and optimize patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiang Chen
- Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Department of Orthopaedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jin-Yu Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Gui-Hua Tian
- Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education and Beijing, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Rui-Jin Qiu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xue-Qian Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education and Beijing, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xue-Shi Di
- Department of Orthopaedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Qiao-Mei Yuan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Shui-Wen Long
- Department of Orthopaedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Ran
- Department of Orthopaedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yu-Song Jia
- Department of Orthopaedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Hong-Cai Shang
- Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education and Beijing, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lynch CP, Cha EDK, Jadczak CN, Mohan S, Geoghegan CE, Singh K. Impact of Depression on Patient Reported Outcomes Following Primary Versus Revision ACDF. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021; 46:1378-1386. [PMID: 33710110 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE To assess the relationship of depressive symptoms with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing either primary or revision anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND Depression has been associated with poorer outcomes following ACDF. However, research examining the relationship between depression and PROMs in revision ACDF procedures is limited. METHODS A prospective database was retrospectively reviewed for primary or revision, single- or multilevel ACDF procedures from 2016 to 2019. Patients lacking preoperative Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) surveys were excluded. Demographic and perioperative characteristics were recorded and analyzed using Fisher's exact test or t test. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. Postoperative improvement from baseline scores (ΔPROM) was calculated at all postoperative timepoints. Differences in mean PROM and ΔPROM between groups and changes from baseline PROM scores within groups were assessed using Student's t test. Linear regression analyzed the impact of preoperative PHQ-9 on ΔPROM. RESULTS A total of 143 patients (121 primary and 22 revision) were included. Significant differences between groups were demonstrated at the preoperative timepoint for Neck Disability Index (NDI) (P = 0.022). ΔPROM values did not significantly differ between groups. Regression analysis revealed significant relationships between preoperative PHQ-9 and ΔPHQ-9 at all timepoints, ΔVAS neck at 6-weeks and 6-months, ΔVAS arm at 6-months, and ΔNDI at 6-weeks and 6-months for the primary group (all P < 0.05). Regression analysis revealed no significant associations for the revision group. CONCLUSION Primary or revision ACDF procedures did not significantly differ in depressive symptoms through 1-year. Primary ACDF patients significantly improved in all PROMs through all timepoints, while revision patients had limited improvement in PROMs. Preoperative depression may have a stronger association on postoperative outcomes for primary procedures.Level of Evidence: 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor P Lynch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Predictors of Outcomes After Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Multivariate Analysis. Clin Spine Surg 2020; 33:E525-E532. [PMID: 32349058 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000000997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective study that was carried out using prospectively collected registry data. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to identify preoperative predictors of outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Proper patient selection is paramount to achieving good surgical results. Identifying predictors of outcomes may aid surgical decision-making and facilitate counseling of patients to manage expectations. METHODS Prospectively collected registry data of 104 patients who underwent single-level ACDF for cervical spondylotic myelopathy were reviewed. Outcomes assessed at 2 years were the presence of residual neck pain/arm pain (AP), and attainment of a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and Physical Component Score (PCS) of SF-36, as well as patient satisfaction, fulfilment of expectations, willingness to undergo same surgery again, return to work (RTW), and return to function (RTF). Receiver operating characteristic curves and multivariate stepwise logistical regression were performed to identify independent predictors of each outcome using 22 covariates including demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative disease state. RESULTS Lower preoperative NDI was predictive of the absence of residual neck pain/AP at 2 years. Higher preoperative JOA score was predictive of MCID attainment for PCS, satisfaction, expectation fulfilment, willingness to undergo the same surgery for same condition, and RTF. Poorer preoperative scores of NDI, JOA, and PCS were predictors of attaining MCID of the respective scores. Older patients were less likely to attain MCID for JOA. Higher preoperative AP was a risk factor for unsuccessful RTW. CONCLUSIONS In general, the preoperative JOA score was the best predictor of outcomes after ACDF. A preoperative JOA cutoff value of 9.25-10.25 predicted satisfaction, expectation fulfilment, willingness to undergo same surgery, and RTF with at least 70% sensitivity and 50% specificity. These findings may aid surgeons in identifying patients at risk of a poor outcome and guide preoperative counseling to establish realistic expectations of the surgical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III-Non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study.
Collapse
|
15
|
The Impact of Multiple Comorbid Mental Health Disorders on Health-related Quality of Life Following ACDF. Clin Spine Surg 2020; 33:E472-E477. [PMID: 32149747 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000000957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective comparative study. OBJECTIVE The goal was to determine whether comorbid depression and/or anxiety influence outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for patients with degenerative cervical pathology. BACKGROUND DATA The role preoperative mental health has on patient reported outcomes after ACDF surgery is not well understood. METHODS Patients undergoing elective ACDF for degenerative cervical pathology were identified. Patients were grouped based on their preoperative mental health comorbidities, including patients with no history, depression, anxiety, and those with both depression and anxiety. All preoperative medical treatment for depression and/or anxiety was identified. Outcomes including Physical Component Score (PCS-12), Mental Component Score (MCS-12), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analogue Scale neck pain score (VAS Neck ), and Visual Analogue Scale arm pain score (VAS Arm) were compared between groups from baseline to postoperative measurements using multiple linear regression analysis-controlling for factors such as age, sex, and body mass index, etc. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS A total of 264 patients were included in the analysis, with an average age of 53 years and mean follow-up of 19.8 months (19.0-20.6). All patients with a diagnosis of depression or anxiety also reported medical treatment for the disease. The group with no depression or anxiety had significantly less baseline disability than the group with 2 mental health diagnoses, in MCS-12 (P=0.009), NDI (P<0.004), VAS Neck (P=0.003), and VAS Arm (P=0.001) scores. Linear regression analysis demonstrated that increasing occurrence of mental health disorders was not a significant predictor of change over time for any of the outcome measures included in the analysis. CONCLUSIONS Despite more severe preoperative symptoms, patients with a preoperative mental health disorder(s) demonstrated significant improvement in postoperative outcomes after ACDF. No differences were identified in postoperative outcomes between each of the groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
|
16
|
Wagner A, Shiban Y, Zeller L, Aftahy K, Lange N, Motov S, Joerger AK, Meyer B, Shiban E. Psychological predictors of quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for degenerative cervical spine disease. Sci Rep 2020; 10:13415. [PMID: 32770143 PMCID: PMC7414876 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70437-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to identify independent psychological predictors of quality of life (QOL) and functional outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical spine disease. We prospectively included patients undergoing ACDF for degenerative cervical disc herniation and stenosis. Patients completed a structured psychological assessment including the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (ADS-K), Post-Traumatic Stress Scale-10 (PTSS-10), State Trait Anxiety Inventory-State Anxiety and - Trait Anxiety (STAI-S and STAI-T) and Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3) before surgery, after 3 and 12 months. Outcome measures included EuroQol-5D (EQ), Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Of 104 included patients who underwent ACDF between March 2013 and November 2017, 92 completed follow-up after 3 and 12 months. The mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for neck pain (− 1.4; p < .001) and arm pain (− 1.8; p = .031) significantly decreased by 12 months. QOL scores significantly increased by 3 months (EQ: + 0.2; p < .001; SF-36 PCS: + 6.2; p < .001; SF-36 MCS: + 2.5; p = .044), a benefit which was retained at 12 months. Linear regression analyses identified statistically significant predictors in preoperative ASI-3, SF-36 MCS and STAI-S for postoperative QOL and ODI scores. There is a benefit for patients in terms of quality of life and function after undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease. With the ASI-3, SF-36 MCS and STAI-S there exist some predictors for postoperative QOL and ODI scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Wagner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Youssef Shiban
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Private University of Applied Sciences, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Leonie Zeller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Kaywan Aftahy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicole Lange
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Motov
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Ann-Kathrin Joerger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Ehab Shiban
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Harris AB, Marrache M, Puvanesarajah V, Raad M, Jain A, Kebaish KM, Riley LH, Skolasky RL. Are preoperative depression and anxiety associated with patient-reported outcomes, health care payments, and opioid use after anterior discectomy and fusion? Spine J 2020; 20:1167-1175. [PMID: 32179156 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Depression and anxiety are common psychiatric conditions among US adults, and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most commonly performed spinal surgeries. Mental health conditions can affect physical health, and thus have the potential to contribute to adverse outcomes after spine surgery; however, a comprehensive assessment of long-term outcomes and the additive economic burden of these conditions in patients undergoing ACDF has not been well described. PURPOSE Our goal was to assess the associations between depression/anxiety and adverse outcomes and health-resource utilization after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective database study. PATIENT SAMPLE We retrospectively analyzed a private administrative health claims database to identify patients who underwent ACDF in the United States from 2010 to 2013. A total of 16,306 patients met our inclusion criteria. Mean (± standard deviation) patient age was 50±7.9 years. Approximately 4,800 patients (30%) had a depression diagnosis and 4,000 (25%) had a diagnosis of anxiety. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes of interest were intensive care unit admission, multiday hospitalization, discharge disposition, 30- and 90-day hospital readmission, 1- and 2-year rates of revision surgery, and chronic postoperative opioid use. Secondary outcomes were 1- and 2-year total cumulative health care payments and cumulative postoperative opioid consumption. METHODS Regression models controlled for demographic and medical covariates, alpha=0.05. RESULTS A preoperative diagnosis of depression was associated with higher odds of multiday hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.19), 90-day readmission (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.46-2.02), revision surgery within 2 years (OR 1.43 95% CI 1.16-1.76), and chronic postoperative opioid use (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.45-1.72) and an increase of $5,915 in adjusted 2-year health care payments (p<.001). Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of anxiety had higher odds of multiday hospitalization (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06-1.25), revision surgery within 2 years (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.07-1.65), and chronic postoperative opioid use (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.48-1.77) and an increase of $4,471 in adjusted 2-year health care payments (p<.001). Neither anxiety nor depression was associated with intensive care unit admission, discharge disposition, 30-day readmission, revision surgery within 1 year, 1-year cumulative health care payments, or cumulative postoperative opioid consumption. CONCLUSIONS Patients with preoperative diagnoses of depression or anxiety have a greater likelihood of adverse outcomes, increased opioid consumption, and increased cumulative health care payments after ACDF compared with patients without depression or anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B Harris
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Majd Marrache
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Varun Puvanesarajah
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Micheal Raad
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amit Jain
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lee H Riley
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard L Skolasky
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mesfin FB, Hoang S, Ortiz Torres M, Ngnitewe Massa'a R, Castillo R. Retrospective Data Analysis and Literature Review for a Development of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Cureus 2020; 12:e6930. [PMID: 32190483 PMCID: PMC7067352 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective While enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are associated with shorter length of stay and improved outcomes in multiple surgical specialties, its application to spine surgery has been limited. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common spinal procedure with a relative efficacy and safety profile that makes it suitable for the application of ERAS principles. Reviewing our outcomes and practice and incorporating evidence-based clinical studies, we propose the development of an ERAS pathway for ACDF. Methods This is a retrospective review of ACDF cases performed at a single institution by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2017. Primary outcome measures included length of stay, complications, and 30-day readmission rates. The 1- and 2-level and the 3- and 4-level groups were also each consolidated into a single cohort for comparison. A comprehensive review of evidence-based literature pertaining to ACDF was then performed. Best-practice recommendations derived from the literature were incorporated into the proposed ERAS protocol. Results In this series of 75 1-level, 77 2-level, 44 3-level and 20 4-level ACDF procedures, the average surgical time (minutes) was 68, 90, 118 and 141; length of stay (days) was 1, 1, 1.4, and 1.7; drain usage (%) was 1.3, 2.6, 13.6 and 10; and 30-day readmission rates (%) were 2.7, 3.9, 4.5, and 15, respectively. Combining the 1- and 2-level as a single group and 3- and 4-level as another cohort, the 3- and 4-level cohort had a significantly higher rate of drain usage and estimated blood loss (EBL) but there was not a difference in length-of-stay, complications or 30-day readmission rates. Conclusions Given the relative equivalent safety profile between 1- and 2-level as compared to 3- and 4-level ACDF, the proposed ERAS pathway can be applied to all patients, and not just restricted to 1-level or 2-level ACDF. Taking into account feasibility parameters as deduced from a review of institutional outcomes, this pathway can streamline same-day discharge and improve the patient experience. Its success will be predicated on an iterative improvement process deriving from optimal prospective outcome measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stanley Hoang
- Neurosurgery, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, USA
| | | | | | - Raul Castillo
- Anesthesiology, University of Missouri Health Care and University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Are Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Influenced by Presurgical Depression Symptoms on the Mental Component Score of the Short Form-12 Survey? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2020; 45:201-207. [PMID: 31513106 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective comparative study. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate whether preoperative depressive symptoms, measured by mental component score of the Short Form-12 survey (MCS-12), influence patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery for cervical degeneration. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA There is a paucity of literature regarding preoperative depression and PROMs following ACDF surgery for cervical degenerative disease. METHODS Patients who underwent an ACDF for degenerative cervical pathology were identified. A score of 45.6 on the MCS-12 was used as the threshold for depression symptoms, and patients were divided into two groups based on this value: depression (MCS-12 ≤45.6) and nondepression (MCS-12 >45.6) groups. Outcomes including Neck Disability Index (NDI), physical component score of the Short Form-12 survey (PCS-12), and Visual Analogue Scale Neck (VAS Neck), and Arm (VAS Arm) pain scores were evaluated using independent sample t test, recovery ratios, percentage of patients reaching the minimum clinically important difference, and multiple linear regression - controlling for factors such as age, sex, and BMI. RESULTS The depression group was found to have significantly worse baseline pain and disability than the nondepression group in NDI (P < 0.001), VAS Neck pain (P < 0.001), and VAS Arm pain (P < 0.001) scores. Postoperatively, both groups improved to a similar amount with surgery based on the recovery ratio analysis. The depression group continued to have worse scores than the nondepression group in NDI (P = 0.010), PCS-12 (P = 0.026), and VAS Arm pain (P = 0.001) scores. Depression was not a significant predictor of change in any PROMs based on regression analysis. CONCLUSION Patients who presented with preoperative depression reported more pain and disability symptoms preoperatively and postoperatively; however, both groups achieved similar degrees of improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
20
|
Yang CC, Lin WC, Chien A, Wang JL, Lai DM. Heterogeneous influences of emotional disturbances on multi-domain quality of life after anterior cervical spine surgery: A prospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2019; 184:105447. [PMID: 31325902 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Revised: 06/01/2019] [Accepted: 07/14/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Quality of life (QoL) has been identified as one of the most important outcome measurements following cervical spine surgery. The contributing factors to post-operative QoL remain limited. This study thus aimed to prospectively examine the QoL and related pre-operative emotional factors in patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 124 patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery were recruited. All participants were prospectively evaluated for their QoL and 2 aspects of emotion, depression and anxiety, before and after surgery, respectively. RESULTS Pre-operatively, 13% of patients showed signs of depression and 31% of patients reported symptoms of anxiety. Post-operatively 14% of patients reported depression, but 41% reported symptoms of anxiety. A significant association between depression, anxiety and different domains of QoL were identified, and specific cut-off points of pre-operatively depressive and/or anxiety levels to predict unfavorable post-operative QoL were further established. CONCLUSIONS This prospective study demonstrated specific emotional factors, specifically depression and anxiety, influence patients' QoL following surgery. These results suggest clinicians should also monitor patients' emotional adjustments with their physical conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi-Cheng Yang
- Department of Psychology, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan; Holistic Social Preventive and Mental Health Center, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chi Lin
- Division of Clinical Psychology, Master of Behavioral Sciences, Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, Chang-Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Andy Chien
- Department of Physical Therapy and Graduate Institute of Rehabilitation Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jaw-Lin Wang
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Dar-Ming Lai
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Poor Baseline Mental Health Does Not Influence Improvement in Patient-reported Outcomes, Satisfaction, and Return to Work Two Years After Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019; 44:839-847. [PMID: 30540718 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000002960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective study using prospectively collected registry data. OBJECTIVE The authors examine the influence of preoperative mental health on outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and determine the impact of ACDF on postoperative mental health. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA While studies have reported a negative correlation between preoperative mental health and outcomes following lumbar spine surgery, the influence on outcomes following cervical spine surgery remains relatively understudied. METHODS Prospectively collected registry data of 104 patients who underwent single-level ACDF for cervical spondylotic myelopathy were reviewed. Patients were dichotomized into top and bottom halves based on preoperative SF-36 MCS (Mental Component Summary) using a cutoff of 48. Outcomes assessed were visual analogue scale for neck pain, arm pain, AAOS Neck Pain and Disability, Neurogenic Symptoms, Neck Disability Index, Short-Form 36, Japanese Orthopaedic Association myelopathy score, return to work, return to function, satisfaction and expectation fulfilment up to 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS The preoperative MCS was 37.5 ± 8.1 and 57.4 ± 6.3 in the Low and High MCS groups respectively (P < 0.001). The Low MCS group had poorer preoperative scores (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in length of stay or comorbidities (P > 0.05). The High MCS group had less neck pain (P = 0.002) and showed a trend towards lower Neck Disability Index (P = 0.062) at 2 years. The Low MCS group demonstrated greater improvement in Japanese Orthopaedic Association (P = 0.007) and similar improvement in other scores (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in proportion that achieved minimal clinically important difference for each score (P > 0.05). Both groups had similar rates of return to work, return to function, expectation fulfilment, and satisfaction (P > 0.05). Lower preoperative MCS was predictive of greater improvement in MCS (r = -0.477, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Despite relatively greater pain and disability at 2 years, patients with poor baseline mental health experienced similar improvement in clinical outcomes, return to work, and satisfaction rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
22
|
Longer Preoperative Duration of Symptoms Negatively Affects Health-related Quality of Life After Surgery for Cervical Radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019; 44:685-690. [PMID: 30395087 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000002924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE Determine the effect of duration of symptoms (DOS) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes for patients with cervical radiculopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The effect of DOS has not been extensively evaluated for cervical radiculopathy. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent an anterior cervical decompression and fusion for radiculopathy was performed. Patients were grouped based on DOS of less than 6 months, 6 months to 2 years, and more than 2 years and HRQOL outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 216 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 16.0 months. There were 86, 61, and 69 patients with symptoms for less than 6 months, 6 months to 2 years, and more than 2 years, respectively. No difference in the absolute postoperative score of the patient reported outcomes was identified between the cohorts. However, in the multivariate analysis, radiculopathy for more than 2 years predicted lower postoperative Short Form-12 Physical Component Score (P = 0.037) and Short Form-12 Mental Component Score (P = 0.029), and higher postoperative Neck Disability Index (P = 0.003), neck pain (P = 0.001), and arm pain (P = 0.004) than radiculopathy for less than 6 months. Furthermore, the recovery ratios for patients with symptoms for less than 6 months demonstrated a greater improvement in NDI, neck pain, and arm pain than for 6 months to 2 years (P = 0.041; 0.005; 0.044) and more than 2 years (P = 0.016; 0.014; 0.002), respectively. CONCLUSION Patients benefit from spine surgery for cervical radiculopathy at all time points, and the absolute postoperative score for the patient reported outcomes did not vary based on the duration of symptoms; however, the regression analysis clearly identified symptoms for more than 2 years as a predictor of worse outcomes, and the recovery ratio was statistically significantly improved in patients who underwent surgery within 6 months of the onset of symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
23
|
Guattery JM, Johnson J, Calfee RP. Automation and Simplification: Drivers of Innovative Collection and Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Data. Popul Health Manag 2019; 22:473-479. [PMID: 30668222 DOI: 10.1089/pop.2018.0180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim was to develop an electronic data capture (EDC) system to capture patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures successfully by automating processes identified as barriers to implementation. Clinical success, research impact, and patient acceptance of this system were evaluated during a pilot and a follow-up period 2 years later. During the pilot, there were 44,831 eligible visits. Capture rate was 99.0% (44,374 visits) and completion rate was 99.4% (44,108 visits). Capture rate was 99.4% and completion rate was 95.2% during the follow-up period. Zero help desk tickets were put in for the EDC system during either time period. Patients accepted the EDC system both during the pilot (1.4% refusal rate) and follow-up period (1.2%). An automated Structured Query Language server feed provided data used to produce numerous abstracts and manuscripts. Automation was crucial to overcoming implementation barriers and delivering PRO scores to the electronic health record in real time with minimal impact on clinical workflow. Automation also has supported PRO research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Guattery
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jimmy Johnson
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ryan P Calfee
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
The Impact of Comorbid Mental Health Disorders on Complications Following Cervical Spine Surgery With Minimum 2-Year Surveillance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018; 43:1455-1462. [PMID: 29579013 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000002651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE To improve understanding of the impact of comorbid mental health disorders (MHDs) on long-term outcomes following cervical spinal fusion in cervical radiculopathy (CR) or cervical myelopathy (CM) patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Subsets of patients with CR and CM have MHDs, and their impact on surgical complications is poorly understood. METHODS Patients admitted from 2009 to 2013 with CR or CM diagnoses who underwent cervical surgery with minimum 2-year surveillance were retrospectively reviewed using New York State's Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System. Patients with a comorbid MHD were compared against those without (no-MHD). Univariate analysis compared demographics, complications, readmissions, and revisions between MHD and no-MHD cohorts. Multivariate binary logistic regression models identified independent predictors of outcomes (covariates: age, sex, Charlson/Deyo score, and surgical approach). RESULTS A total of 20,342 patients (MHD: n = 4819; no-MHD: n = 15,523) were included. MHDs identified: depressive (57.8%), anxiety (28.1%), sleep (25.2%), and stress (2.9%). CR patients had greater prevalence of comorbid MHD than CM patients (P = 0.015). Two years postoperatively, all patients with MHD had significantly higher rates of complications (specifically: device-related, infection), readmission for any indication, and revision surgery (all P < 0.05); regression modeling corroborated these findings and revealed combined surgical approach as the strongest predictor for any complication (CR, odds ratio [OR]: 3.945, P < 0.001; CM, OR: 2.828, P < 0.001) and MHD as the strongest predictor for future revision (CR, OR: 1.269, P = 0.001; CM, OR: 1.248, P = 0.008) in both CR and CM cohorts. CONCLUSION Nearly 25% of patients admitted for CR and CM carried comorbid MHD and experienced greater rates of any complication, readmission, or revision, at minimum, 2 years after cervical spine surgery. Results must be confirmed with retrospective studies utilizing larger national databases and with prospective cohort studies. Patient counseling and psychological screening/support are recommended to complement surgical treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
25
|
MacDowall A, Skeppholm M, Lindhagen L, Robinson Y, Olerud C. Effects of preoperative mental distress versus surgical modality, arthroplasty, or fusion on long-term outcome in patients with cervical radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2018; 29:371-379. [DOI: 10.3171/2018.2.spine171378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVESeveral efforts have been made to investigate the long-term efficacy of artificial disc replacement surgery compared with that of fusion after decompression for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy. However, research on the impact of mental distress on surgical treatment outcome has been sparse. The aim of the authors was to investigate the potential predictive value of preoperative risk factors in determining long-term outcome.METHODSA total of 153 patients (mean age 47 years) with single- or double-level cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy were randomly assigned to undergo either anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (n = 70) or artificial disc replacement (n = 83). The primary outcome was the Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, a patient-reported function score that ranges from 0% to 100%; higher scores indicate greater disability. Preoperative variables such as sex, age, smoking status, employment status, having a strenuous job, neck pain duration, arm pain duration, amount of regular exercise, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score, NDI score, whether surgery was performed on 1 or 2 levels, and allocated treatment were analyzed in multiple linear regression models with the 5-year NDI score as the outcome.RESULTSA total of 47 (31%) patients had either a HADS anxiety or HADS depression score of 10 points or higher. High values on the preoperative HADS were a negative predictor of outcome (p = 0.009). Treatment allocation had no effect on 5-year NDI scores (p = 0.32).CONCLUSIONSPreoperative mental distress measured with the HADS affects long-term outcome in surgically treated patients with cervical radiculopathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna MacDowall
- 1Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala
| | - Martin Skeppholm
- 2Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Medical Management Center, Health Economics and Health Evaluation Research Group, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
- 3Center for Spine Surgery in Stockholm, Sophiahemmet Sjukhus, Stockholm; and
| | - Lars Lindhagen
- 4Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Yohan Robinson
- 1Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala
| | - Claes Olerud
- 1Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Guattery JM, Dardas AZ, Kelly M, Chamberlain A, McAndrew C, Calfee RP. Floor Effect of PROMIS Depression CAT Associated With Hasty Completion in Orthopaedic Surgery Patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476:696-703. [PMID: 29419628 PMCID: PMC6260068 DOI: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed to provide valid, reliable, and standardized measures to gather patient-reported outcomes for many health domains, including depression, independent of patient condition. Most studies confirming the performance of these measures were conducted with a consented, volunteer study population for testing. Using a study population that has undergone the process of informed consent may be differentiated from the validation group because they are educated specifically as to the purpose of the questions and they will not have answers recorded in their permanent health record. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) When given as part of routine practice to an orthopaedic population, do PROMIS Physical Function and Depression item banks produce score distributions different than those produced by the populations used to calibrate and validate the item banks? (2) Does the presence of a nonnormal distribution in the PROMIS Depression scores in a clinical population reflect a deliberately hasty answering of questions by patients? (3) Are patients who are reporting minimal depressive symptoms by scoring the minimum score on the PROMIS Depression Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) distinct from other patients according to demographic data or their scores on other PROMIS assessments? METHODS Univariate descriptive statistics and graphic histograms were used to describe the frequency distribution of scores for the Physical Function and Depression item banks for all orthopaedic patients 18 years or older who had an outpatient visit between June 2015 and December 2016. The study population was then broken into two groups based on whether they indicated a lack of depressive symptoms and scored the minimum score (34.2) on the Depression CAT assessment (Floor Group) or not (Standard Group). The distribution of Physical Function CAT scores was compared between the two groups. Finally, a time-per-question value was calculated for both the Physical Function and Depression CATs and was compared between assessments within each group as well as between the two groups. Bivariate statistics compared the demographic data between the two groups. RESULTS Physical Function CAT scores in musculoskeletal patients were normally distributed like the distribution calibration population; however, the score distribution of the Depression CAT in musculoskeletal patients was nonnormal with a spike in the floor score. After excluding the floor spike, the distribution of the Depression CAT scores was not different from the population control group. Patients who scored the floor score on the Depression CAT took slightly less time per question for Physical Function CAT when compared with other musculoskeletal patients (floor patients: 11 ± 9 seconds; normally distributed patients: 12 ± 10 seconds; mean difference: 1 second [0.8-1.1]; p < 0.001 but not clinically relevant). They spent a substantially shorter amount of time per question on the Depression CAT (Floor Group: 4 ± 3 seconds; Standard Group: 7 ± 7 seconds; mean difference: 3 [2.9-3.2]; p < 0.001). Patients who scored the minimum score on the PROMIS Depression CAT were younger than other patients (Floor Group: 50 ± 18 SD; Standard Group: 55 ± 16 SD; mean difference: 4.5 [4.2-4.7]; p < 0.001) with a larger percentage of men (Floor Group: 48.8%; Standard Group 40.0%; odds ratio 0.6 [0.6-0.7]; p < 0.001) and minor differences in racial breakdown (Floor Group: white 85.2%, black 11.9%, other 0.03%; Standard Group: white 83.9%, black 13.7%, other 0.02%). CONCLUSIONS In an orthopaedic surgery population that is given PROMIS CAT as part of routine practice, the Physical Function item bank had a normal performance, but there is a group of patients who hastily complete Depression questions producing a strong floor effect and calling into question the validity of those floor scores that indicate minimal depression. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II, diagnostic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Guattery
- Jason M. Guattery MS, Agnes Z. Dardas BA, Michael Kelly MD, Aaron Chamberlain MD, MSc, Christopher McAndrew MD, MSc, Ryan P. Calfee MD, MSc, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the effect depression has on the improvement of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following lumbar decompression. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Decompression without fusion is a viable treatment option for lumbar spine stenosis. Depression reportedly has a negative impact on PROMs after certain types of spine surgery, though verification of this with new, more precise outcome measures is needed. METHODS We included consecutive adult patients who underwent lumbar decompression for lumbar spine stenosis between 2016 and 2017 who had PROM information system (PROMIS) physical function, pain, depression, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaires completed preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up. Patients with a PROMIS depression score >50 or <50 were allocated to the depressed and not depressed groups, respectively. The cohorts were compared using unpaired t tests and repeated-measures two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with statistical significance taken at P < 0.05. RESULTS The analysis included 55 patients without depression and 56 patients with depression. Depressed patients had worse preoperative PROMIS physical function (30.08 vs. 36.66, P = 0.005), PROMIS pain (69.36 vs. 64.69, P < 0.0001), and ODI scores (51.92 vs. 36.35, P < 0.0001). Similarly, the depressed group had worse postoperative PROMIS physical function (36.29 vs. 40.34, P = 0.005), PROMIS pain (60.16 vs. 54.87, P < 0.0001), and ODI scores (37.01 vs. 23.44, P = 0.0003). We observed a statistically significant interaction between depression status and pre to postoperative improvement in outcome for PROMIS physical function (F[1,109] = 102.5, P < 0.0001) and depression scores (F[1,109] = 15.38, P = 0.0002). No interaction was found for pain and ODI scores. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that depressed patients experience a greater magnitude of improvement in PROMIS physical function and depression scores than nondepressed patients. Despite this, depressed patients have worse postoperative outcomes for PROMIS physical function, depression, pain, and ODI. These findings are important for risk stratifying and treating depressed patients before lumbar spine decompression. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
28
|
Adogwa O, Elsamadicy AA, Sergesketter AR, Black C, Tarnasky A, Ongele MO, Vuong VD, Khalid S, Cheng J, Bagley CA, Karikari IO. Relationship Among Koenig Depression Scale and Postoperative Outcomes, Ambulation, and Perception of Pain in Elderly Patients (≥65 Years) Undergoing Elective Spinal Surgery for Adult Scoliosis. World Neurosurg 2017; 107:471-476. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2017] [Revised: 07/25/2017] [Accepted: 07/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|