1
|
Goldman MJ, Teh BS, Lo SS, Butler EB, Baskin DS. Radiosurgery for Intracranial Meningiomas: A Review of Anatomical Challenges and an Update on the Evidence. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 17:45. [PMID: 39796674 PMCID: PMC11718812 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2024] [Revised: 12/19/2024] [Accepted: 12/20/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2025] Open
Abstract
Radiation has been used to treat meningiomas since the mid-1970s. Traditionally, radiation was reserved for patients unfit for major surgery or those with surgically inaccessible tumors. With an increased quantity and quality of imaging, and an aging population, there has been a rise in incidentally diagnosed meningiomas with smaller tumors at diagnosis time. Deciding if, how, and when to intervene must be determined on a case-by-case basis. Anatomical location and adjacent vital structures are crucial for decision-making. Prior review articles have detailed outcomes of radiosurgery in broad anatomical regions such as the skull base, but a recent deluge of research on increasingly specific anatomical subregions deserves attention. This narrative review synthesizes information regarding specific anatomical subregions, including anatomical challenges, radiosurgical outcomes, and unique considerations. Via MEDLINE and ascendancy search, we utilized evidence available for each anatomical region and herein discuss details of published research and explore future directions. Meningioma management remains individualized based on patient comorbidities, tumor location/characteristics, symptomatic burden, and patient age. In addition to stereotactic radiosurgery's established role for surgically inaccessible, recurrent, and high-grade meningiomas, its use as upfront management for small asymptomatic meningiomas is increasingly investigated. For all subregions reported, radiosurgical intervention resulted in high tumor control rates and acceptably low adverse radiation events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J. Goldman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Bin S. Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (B.S.T.); (E.B.B.)
| | - Simon S. Lo
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;
| | - E. Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (B.S.T.); (E.B.B.)
| | - David S. Baskin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
- Kenneth R. Peak Brain and Pituitary Tumor Treatment Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10022, USA
- Department of Medicine, Texas A & M Medical School, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baldoncini M, Luzzi S, Almeida JP, Contreras-López WO, La Corte E, Ordóñez-Rubiano EG, Campero A. Surgical corridors to foramen magnum meningiomas: a mini-review. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1228285. [PMID: 37528861 PMCID: PMC10389656 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1228285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Gross-total resection of foramen magnum meningiomas remains the gold standard of treatment and should be performed whenever possible. The transcondylar approach (and its variations) represents the most used approach for meningiomas located in the lateral or anterior borders of the foramen magnum. Endoscopic transclivus approaches represent a useful option in selected cases of anterior midline foramen magnum meningiomas, to be performed in centers with advanced experience in endoscopic skull base surgery, with the caveats of increased risk of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak. Alternatively, radiosurgery remains an option for well-selected cases, especially for the management of asymptomatic patients with small enlarging tumors. Advances in molecular profiling, as well as genetic analysis, may guide adjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matias Baldoncini
- Laboratory of Microsurgical Neuroanatomy, Second Chair of Gross Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hospital San Fernando, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Sabino Luzzi
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Joao P. Almeida
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - William Omar Contreras-López
- Functional Neurosurgery, NEMOD International Neuromodulation Center, Clínica Foscal Internacional, UNAB University, Bucaramanga, Colombia
| | - Emanuele La Corte
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Edgar G. Ordóñez-Rubiano
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Hospital de San José – Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Alvaro Campero
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Padilla Hospital, Tucumán, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shimanskiy VN, Sultanov RA, Tanyashin SV, Golanov AV, Galkin MV, Karnaukhov VV, Danilov GV, Strunina YV. [Surgical and combined treatment of patients with craniovertebral junction meningioma: a single-center retrospective study of 196 cases]. ZHURNAL VOPROSY NEIROKHIRURGII IMENI N. N. BURDENKO 2023; 87:22-29. [PMID: 37011325 DOI: 10.17116/neiro20238702122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
Treatment of craniovertebral junction meningioma is a difficult task. Surgical treatment is the gold standard for these patients. However, it is associated with high risk of neurological impairment, while combined treatment (surgery + radiotherapy) provides more favorable outcomes. OBJECTIVE To present the results of surgical and combined treatment of patients with craniovertebral junction meningioma. MATERIAL AND METHODS There were 196 patients with craniovertebral junction meningioma who underwent surgical or combined (surgery + radiotherapy) treatment at the Burdenko Neurosurgery Center between January 2005 and June 2022. The sample included 151 women and 45 men (3.4:1). Resection of tumor was performed in 97.4% of patients, craniovertebral junction decompression with dural defect closure - 2%, ventriculoperitoneostomy - 0.5%. As the second stage, 40 patients (20.4%) underwent radiotherapy. RESULTS Total resection was achieved in 106 patients (55.2%), subtotal - 63 (32.8%), partial - 20 (10.4%), tumor biopsy was performed in 3 (1.6%) cases. Intraoperative complications occurred in 8 patients (4%), postoperative complications - in 19 (9.7%) cases. Radiosurgery was carried out in 6 (15%) patients, hypofractionated irradiation - 15 (37.5%), standard fractionation - 19 (47.5%) patients. Tumor growth control after combined treatment made up 84%. CONCLUSION Clinical outcomes in patients with craniovertebral junction meningioma depend on tumor dimensions, topographic and anatomical localization of tumor, resection quality and relationship with surrounding structures. Combined treatment of anterior and anterolateral meningiomas of the craniovertebral junction is preferable compared to total resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - A V Golanov
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - M V Galkin
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - G V Danilov
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Karras CL, Texakalidis P, Nie JZ, Trybula SJ, Youngblood MW, Sachdev S, Thomas TO, Kalapurakal J, Chandler JP, Magill ST. Outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery for foramen magnum meningiomas: a single-center experience and systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 2022; 53:E6. [DOI: 10.3171/2022.8.focus22299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Foramen magnum meningiomas (FMMs) pose a unique challenge given their intimate anatomical relationship with the craniovertebral junction. While resection has been studied extensively, much less has been reported about the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for FMMs. This study includes what is to the authors’ knowledge the first systematic review in the literature that summarizes patient and treatment characteristics and synthesizes outcomes following SRS for FMMs.
METHODS
A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single major academic institution, and a systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The initial search on the PubMed and Scopus databases yielded 530 results. Key data extracted from both databases included Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score and neurological deficits at presentation, tumor location, treatment indication, target volume, single versus multiple fractions, marginal and maximum doses, isodose line, clinical and radiographic follow-up times, and primary (clinical stability and local control at last follow-up) and secondary (mortality, adverse radiation events, time to regression, progression-free survival) outcomes.
RESULTS
The study patients included 9 patients from the authors’ institution and 165 patients across 4 studies who received SRS for FMMs. The weighted median age at treatment was 60.2 years, and 73.9% of patients were female. Common presenting symptoms included headache (33.9%), dizziness/ataxia (29.7%), cranial nerve deficit(s) (27.9%), numbness (22.4%), weakness (15.2%), and hydrocephalus (4.2%). Lateral/ventrolateral (64.2%) was the most common tumor location. SRS was utilized as the primary therapy in 63.6% of patients and as salvage (21.8%) or adjuvant (14.5%) therapy for the rest of the patients. Most patients (91.5%) were treated with a single fraction. A tumor with a weighted median target volume of 2.9 cm3 was treated with a weighted median marginal dose, maximum dose, and isodose line of 12.9 Gy, 22.8 Gy, and 58%, respectively. Clinical stability and local control at last follow-up were achieved in 98.8% and 97.0% of patients, respectively. Only one possible adverse radiation event occurred, and no mortality directly related to the tumor or SRS was reported.
CONCLUSIONS
In this retrospective analysis and systematic review, the authors demonstrate SRS to be an effective and safe treatment option for carefully selected patients with FMMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jeffrey Z. Nie
- School of Medicine, Southern Illinois University, Springfield; and
| | - S. Joy Trybula
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago
| | | | - Sean Sachdev
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Tarita O. Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - John Kalapurakal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - James P. Chandler
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago
| | - Stephen T. Magill
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ruiz-Garcia H, Trifiletti DM, Mohammed N, Hung YC, Xu Z, Chytka T, Liscak R, Tripathi M, Arsanious D, Cifarelli CP, Caceres MP, Mathieu D, Speckter H, Mehta GU, Lekovic GP, Sheehan JP. Skull Base Meningiomas in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 2: An International Multicenter Study Evaluating Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Skull Base Surg 2022; 83:e173-e180. [PMID: 35832959 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective Meningiomas are the second most common tumors in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF-2). Microsurgery is challenging in NF-2 patients presenting with skull base meningiomas due to the intrinsic risks and need for multiple interventions over time. We analyzed treatment outcomes and complications after primary Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) to delineate its role in the management of these tumors. Methods An international multicenter retrospective study approved by the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation was performed. NF-2 patients with at least one growing and/or symptomatic skull base meningioma and 6-month follow-up after primary GKRS were included. Clinical and radiosurgical parameters were recorded for analysis. Results In total, 22 NF-2 patients with 54 skull base meningiomas receiving GKRS as primary treatment met inclusion criteria. Median age at GKRS was 38 years (10-79 years). Most lesions were located in the posterior fossa (55.6%). Actuarial progression free survival (PFS) rates were 98.1% at 2 years and 90.0% at 5 and 10 years. The median follow-up time after initial GKRS was 5.0 years (0.6-25.5 years). Tumor volume at GKRS was a predictor of tumor control. Lesions >5.5 cc presented higher chances to progress after radiosurgery ( p = 0.043). Three patients (13.64%) developed adverse radiation effects. No malignant transformation or death due to meningioma or radiosurgery was reported. Conclusions GKRS is effective and safe in the management of skull base meningiomas in NF-2 patients. Tumor volume deserve greater relevance during clinical decision-making regarding the most appropriate time to treat. GKRS offers a minimally invasive approach of particular interest in this specific group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Nasser Mohammed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Yi-Chieh Hung
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Tomas Chytka
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Manjul Tripathi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - David Arsanious
- Department of Neurological Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
| | - Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurological Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
| | - Marco Perez Caceres
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT Hospital, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Gautam U Mehta
- Department of Neurological Surgery, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Gregory P Lekovic
- Department of Neurological Surgery, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Meningiomas arise in various locations. Convexity tumors are relatively simple to remove. Skull base tumors and tumors adjacent to the major cerebral veins and venous sinuses can be very difficult to extirpate. Attempts at radical resection can lead to serious morbidity. The combination of bulk reduction using microsurgery followed by GKNS gives greatly improved survival and very low morbidity. With smaller tumors, GKNS may be used as the primary treatment. Increasing numbers of asymptomatic meningiomas are demonstrated either as an unexpected finding or as a residual or recurrent tumor after surgery. In all of these situations, GKNS gives a better result than observation or reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy C Ganz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The Role of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Foramen Magnum Meningiomas-A Multicenter Analysis and Review of the Literature. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020341. [PMID: 35053504 PMCID: PMC8773727 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Meningiomas represent the most common central nervous system (CNS) tumor. Despite their often benign nature, a tumor location in direct proximity to vital brain structures may lead to significant morbidity. This is the case for foramen magnum meningiomas (FMMs) as they grow at the skull base, next to the brain stem and foramen magnum. Surgical resection represents the mainstay of FMM treatments. In patients unsuitable for surgery, with tumor recurrences or tumor remnants after surgery, non-invasive treatment modalities may play a crucial role in patient management. Reports and studies on stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of FMMs are scarce. This multicenter analysis reported the outcome data of 62 patients with FMMs. SRS achieved a high local tumor control and demonstrated a favorable safety profile. These results are in agreement with previous findings. SRS should be considered for selected FMM patients. Abstract Background: Foramen magnum meningiomas (FMMs) represent a considerable neurosurgical challenge given their location and potential morbidity. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established non-invasive treatment modality for various benign and malignant brain tumors. However, reports on single-session or multisession SRS for the management and treatment of FMMs are exceedingly rare. We report the largest FMM SRS series to date and describe our multicenter treatment experience utilizing robotic radiosurgery. Methods: Patients who underwent SRS between 2005 and 2020 as a treatment for a FMM at six different centers were eligible for analysis. Results: Sixty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 28.9 months. The median prescription dose and isodose line were 14 Gy and 70%, respectively. Single-session SRS accounted for 81% of treatments. The remaining patients received three to five fractions, with doses ranging from 19.5 to 25 Gy. Ten (16%) patients were treated for a tumor recurrence after surgery, and thirteen (21%) underwent adjuvant treatment. The remaining 39 FMMs (63%) received SRS as their primary treatment. For patients with an upfront surgical resection, histopathological examination revealed 22 World Health Organization grade I tumors and one grade II FMM. The median tumor volume was 2.6 cubic centimeters. No local failures were observed throughout the available follow-up, including patients with a follow-up ≥ five years (16 patients), leading to an overall local control of 100%. Tumor volume significantly decreased after treatment, with a median volume reduction of 21% at the last available follow-up (p < 0.01). The one-, three-, and five-year progression-free survival were 100%, 96.6%, and 93.0%, respectively. Most patients showed stable (47%) or improved (21%) neurological deficits at the last follow-up. No high-grade adverse events were observed. Conclusions: SRS is an effective and safe treatment modality for FMMs. Despite the paucity of available data and previous reports, SRS should be considered for selected patients, especially those with subtotal tumor resections, recurrences, and patients not suitable for surgery.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bunevicius A, Suleiman M, Patel S, Martínez Álvarez R, Martinez Moreno NE, Liscak R, Hanuska J, Langlois AM, Mathieu D, Mau C, Caldwell C, Tuanquin LC, Zacharia BE, McInerney J, Lee CC, Yang HC, Peterson JL, Trifiletti DM, Ogino A, Kano H, Warnick RE, Saylany A, Buch LY, Lee JYK, Strickland BA, Zada G, Chang EL, Lunsford LD, Sheehan J. Stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of radiation-induced meningiomas: a multiinstitutional study. J Neurosurg 2021; 135:862-870. [PMID: 33385995 DOI: 10.3171/2020.7.jns202064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Radiation-induced meningiomas (RIMs) are associated with aggressive clinical behavior. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is sometimes considered for selected RIMs. The authors investigated the effectiveness and safety of SRS for the management of RIMs. METHODS From 12 institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation, the authors pooled patients who had prior cranial irradiation and were subsequently clinically diagnosed with WHO grade I meningiomas that were managed with SRS. RESULTS Fifty-two patients underwent 60 SRS procedures for histologically confirmed or radiologically suspected WHO grade I RIMs. The median ages at initial cranial radiation therapy and SRS for RIM were 5.5 years and 39 years, respectively. The most common reasons for cranial radiation therapy were leukemia (21%) and medulloblastoma (17%). There were 39 multiple RIMs (35%), the mean target volume was 8.61 ± 7.80 cm3, and the median prescription dose was 14 Gy. The median imaging follow-up duration was 48 months (range 4-195 months). RIM progressed in 9 patients (17%) at a median duration of 30 months (range 3-45 months) after SRS. Progression-free survival at 5 years post-SRS was 83%. Treatment volume ≥ 5 cm3 predicted progression (HR 8.226, 95% CI 1.028-65.857, p = 0.047). Seven patients (14%) developed new neurological symptoms or experienced SRS-related complications or T2 signal change from 1 to 72 months after SRS. CONCLUSIONS SRS is associated with durable local control of RIMs in the majority of patients and has an acceptable safety profile. SRS can be considered for patients and tumors that are deemed suboptimal, poor surgical candidates, and those whose tumor again progresses after removal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adomas Bunevicius
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Mohand Suleiman
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Samir Patel
- 2Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Roman Liscak
- 4Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jaromir Hanuska
- 4Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anne-Marie Langlois
- 5Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- 5Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Christine Mau
- 6Penn State Health, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Brad E Zacharia
- 6Penn State Health, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - James McInerney
- 6Penn State Health, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- 7Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, and National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- 7Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, and National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | - Akiyoshi Ogino
- 9Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Hideyuki Kano
- 9Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Anissa Saylany
- 11Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Love Y Buch
- 11Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - John Y K Lee
- 11Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | | | - Gabriel Zada
- 12University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Eric L Chang
- 12University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- 9Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jason Sheehan
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fatima N, Shin JH, Curry WT, Chang SD, Meola A. Microsurgical resection of foramen magnum meningioma: multi-institutional retrospective case series and proposed surgical risk scoring system. J Neurooncol 2021; 153:331-342. [PMID: 33973146 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03773-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Foramen magnum meningiomas (FMMs) are a major surgical challenge, due to relevant surgical morbidity and mortality. The paper aims to review the clinical (symptomatic improvement, complication rate, length of hospital stay) and radiological outcome (completeness of resection) of microsurgical resection of FMMs, and to identify predictors of complications. METHODS A multi-institutional retrospective review of prospectively maintained database of FMMs included 51 patients (74.5% females) with a median tumor volume of 8.18 cm3 (range, 1.77-57.9 cm3) and median follow-up of 36 months (range, 0.30-180.0 months). Tumors were resected though suboccipital approach (58.8%) or posterior-lateral approaches (39.3%), including far-lateral, extreme lateral and transcondylar approaches. RESULTS Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 80.4% and 98% of cases did not present tumor regrowth or recurrence. Clinical symptoms improved in 34 patients (66.7%) and worsened in 5 (9.8%). The median length of hospital stay was 5 days. Mortality was null. Postoperative complications developed in 15 patients (29.4%), with cerebrospinal fluid leak (7.8%) and lower cranial nerves deficits (7.8%) as the most frequent. Craniospinal location (p = 0.03), location anterior to the dentate ligament (DL) (p = 0.02), involvement of vertebral artery (VA) (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with complication rate. These three elements allow calculating the Foramen Magnum Meningioma Risk Score (FRMMRS), to estimate the risk of post-operative complications. CONCLUSION Microsurgical resection allows for high GTR rate and low rate of tumor regrowth or recurrence, despite complications in one third of the patients. The FMMRS allows classifying FMMs and estimating the risk of post-operative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nida Fatima
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John H Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William T Curry
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven D Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Antonio Meola
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ruiz-Garcia H, Trifiletti DM, Mohammed N, Hung YC, Xu Z, Chytka T, Liscak R, Tripathi M, Arsanious D, Cifarelli CP, Caceres MP, Mathieu D, Speckter H, Lekovic GP, Mehta GU, Sheehan JP. Convexity Meningiomas in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Long-Term Outcomes After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery. World Neurosurg 2021; 146:e678-e684. [PMID: 33152493 PMCID: PMC7988886 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Convexity meningiomas are common tumors requiring treatment in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). Although different therapeutic options are described for sporadic convexity meningioma, much less is known about these lesions in patients with NF2 despite their distinct biology and need for multiple treatments. We analyzed the value of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) as definitive treatment for convexity meningiomas in patients with NF2. METHODS This international multicenter retrospective study was approved by the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. Patients with NF2 with at least 1 convexity meningioma and 6-month follow-up after primary GKRS were included. RESULTS Inclusion criteria were met by 18 patients with NF2. A total of 120 convexity meningiomas (median treatment volume, 0.66 cm3 [range, 0.10-21.20 cm3]) were analyzed. Median follow-up after initial GKRS was 15.6 years (range, 0.6-25.5 years). Median age at GKRS was 32.5 years (range, 16-53 years). Median number of meningiomas per patient was 13 (range, 1-27), and median number of convexity lesions receiving GKRS per patient was 3.5 (range, 1-27). One case of tumor progression was reported 24 years after GKRS, leading to actuarial progression-free survival rates of 100% at 2, 5, and 10 years. No malignant transformation or death due to meningioma or radiosurgery was recorded. CONCLUSIONS GKRS is safe and effective as definitive treatment of small to medium-sized convexity meningiomas in patients with NF2. Despite concerns about the particular mutational burden of these tumors, no malignant transformation manifested after treatment. GKRS represents a minimally invasive option that offers long-term tumor control to this specific group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Nasser Mohammed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Yi-Chieh Hung
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Tomas Chytka
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Manjul Tripathi
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - David Arsanious
- Department of Neurological Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Marco Perez Caceres
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Dominican Gamma Knife Center and CEDIMAT Hospital, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | | | | | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Akyoldaş G, Samancı Y, Yılmaz M, Şengöz M, Peker S. Long-term results of gamma knife radiosurgery for foramen magnum meningiomas. Neurosurg Rev 2020; 44:2667-2673. [PMID: 33244665 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01446-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Outcomes of 37 patients of foramen magnum meningioma (FMM) were evaluated, and the related literature was reviewed to determine the efficacy of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for treating patients with FMM. We present the largest series reported from a single institution with the longest follow-up to date. The database of patients who underwent GKRS for FMM between 2007 and 2019 was evaluated retrospectively. A total of 37 patients with radiological and pathological features consistent with FMM were included in this series. Thirty-three patients were female, and 4 were male. The median age was 58 years (range, 23-74 years). The most common symptom at diagnosis was headache (64.9%). Twelve patients had a history of microsurgical resection. The median duration from the initial onset of symptoms to GKRS was 12 months (range 1-140 months). Among the 37 tumors, eight (21.6%) were located ventrally, 24 (64.9%) laterally, and five (13.5%) dorsally. The median target volume was 3.30 cm3 (range, 0.6-17.6 cm3). Thirty-five patients (95%) were treated with single fraction GKRS, and two patients (5%) were treated with hypofractionated GKRS. The median clinical follow-up was 80 months (range, 18-151 months), while the median radiological follow-up was 84 months (range, 18-144 months). At the last clinical follow-up after GKRS, 27 patients (73%) had improved symptoms, and none had worsened pre-GKRS symptoms. At the last radiological follow-up after GKRS, 23 tumors (62.2%) remained stable, 13 (35.1%) decreased in size, and 1 (2.7%) increased in size. Tumor control, including stable and regressed tumors, was achieved in 97.3% of patients. Our cohort demonstrates that GKRS is an effective and safe treatment for patients with either primary or recurrent/residual FMM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Göktuğ Akyoldaş
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Yavuz Samancı
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Meltem Yılmaz
- Medical Biotechnology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Meriç Şengöz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Selçuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jumah F, Narayan V, Samara A, Quinoa TR, Dossani RH, Gupta G, Nanda A. Efficacy and safety of gamma knife radiosurgery for posterior cranial fossa meningioma: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev 2019; 43:1089-1099. [PMID: 31385110 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-019-01144-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2019] [Revised: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The management of posterior cranial fossa meningioma [PCFM] is challenging and many neurosurgeons advise gamma knife radiosurgery [GKRS] as a modality for its upfront or adjuvant treatment. Due to the varying radiosurgical response based on lesion location, tumor biology, and radiation dosage, we performed a pioneer attempt in doing a systematic review analyzing the treatment efficacy and safety profile of GKRS for PCFM based on current literature. A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses [PRISMA] guidelines. A thorough literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of science, and Cochrane data base; articles were selected systematically based on PRISMA protocol, reviewed completely, and relevant data was summarized and discussed. A total of 18 publications pertaining to GKRS for PCFM were included with a pooled sample size of 2131 patients. The median pre-GKRS tumor volume ranged from 2.28 to 10.5 cm [3]. Primary GKRS was administered in 61.1% of the pooled study cohorts, adjuvant treatment in 32.9%, and salvage therapy in 6.5% patients. Majority of the meningiomas were WHO grade 1 tumors (99.7%). The pooled mean marginal dose in the studies was 13.6 Gy (range 12-15.2 Gy) while the mean of maximum doses was 28.6 Gy (range 25-35 Gy). Most studies report an excellent radiosurgical outcome including the tumor control rate and the progression-free survival [PFS] of over 90%. The tumor control, PFS, and adverse radiation effect [ARE] rates in author's series were 92.3%, 91%, and 9.6%, respectively. The favorable radiosurgical outcome depends on multiple factors such as small tumor volume, absence of previous radiotherapy, tumor location, elderly patients, female gender, longer time from symptom onset, and decreasing maximal dose. GKRS as primary or adjuvant treatment modality needs to be considered as a promising management strategy for PCFM in selected patients in view of the growing evidence of high tumor control rate, improved neurological functions, and low incidence of ARE. The use of multiple isocenters, 3-D image planning, and limit GKRS treatment to tumors less than 3.5 cm help to avoid complications and achieve the best results. The treatment decisions in PCFM cases must be tailored and should consider the factors such as radiological profile, symptom severity, performance level, and patient preference for a good outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fareed Jumah
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School & University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Vinayak Narayan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School & University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Amjad Samara
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Travis R Quinoa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School & University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | - Gaurav Gupta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School & University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Anil Nanda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School & University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. .,Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kondziolka D. Current and novel practice of stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 2019; 130:1789-1798. [PMID: 31153140 DOI: 10.3171/2019.2.jns181712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery emerged as a neurosurgical discipline in order to utilize energy for the manipulation of brain or nerve tissue, with the goal of minimal access and safe and effective care of a spectrum of neurosurgical disorders. Perhaps no other branch of neurosurgery has been so disruptive across the entire discipline of brain tumor care, treatment of vascular disorders, and management of functional problems. Radiosurgery is mainstream, supported by thousands of peer-reviewed outcomes reports. This article reviews current practice with a focus on challenges, emerging trends, and areas of investigation.
Collapse
|
14
|
Macdonald RL. Letter to the Editor. Limited data? J Neurosurg 2019; 130:670-671. [PMID: 30554185 DOI: 10.3171/2018.9.jns182618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- R Loch Macdonald
- 1Labatt Family Centre of Excellence in Brain Injury and Trauma Research, Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; and
- 2University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|