Symptomatic spinal extradural arachnoid cyst with cord compression in a family: case report

Spinal extradural arachnoid cysts: a rare entity and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Spinal extradural arachnoid cysts (SEDC) are rare primary spinal lesions, accounting for less than 1% of all spinal epidural lesions. The literature contains only case reports of this pathology, and treatment remains controversial due to its rarity. Major reported SEDC cases are caused by leaking out of cerebrospinal fluid through a dural defect in the thecal sac forming an extradural cyst. Other reports describe non-communicating SEDC cases where the dural defect was not identified. We report a literature review on SEDC and the case of a 53 year‑old female who presented with type IA extradural cyst with subarachnoid space communication.

METHODS

Literature review, preoperative imaging and surgical technique.

RESULTS

The extradural cyst was excised completely and the dural defect was repaired. After surgical decompression, neurological symptoms gradually recovered.

CONCLUSIONS

The extradural arachnoid cyst is an uncommon entity. Preoperative imaging is one of the determining elements in orienting the therapeutic management of the SEDCs. The choice of the surgical technique must be the least invasive in order to avoid postoperative complications. Subtotal or complete excision of the cyst, followed by obliteration of the communication stalk and repair of the dural defect is the gold standard treatment.

Prenatal dispositions and genetic analysis of monozygotic female twins with suprasellar cysts and hydrocephalus: A case report

INTRODUCTION

We present a unique case of monozygotic female twins with virtually identical clinical and radiological presentations of supratentorial hydrocephalus and cystic formations from the suprasellar cistern.

DISCUSSION

Evaluating genetic predispositions and prenatal exposures is crucial for hydrocephalus in twins. Familial cases imply a genetic contribution to the development of these anomalies, including chromosomal abnormalities and specific variants linked to arachnoid cyst formation in various syndromes. Extensive genetic analyses found no pathogenic variants in the twins. Prenatal exposure to anti-epileptic medication was known during pregnancy and may be associated with fetal abnormalities, but not central nervous system (CNS) malformations, and was therefore not considered the cause of the condition in the twins. The twins presenting simultaneously with hydrocephalus caused by suprasellar cysts (SAC) underwent a two-step surgical management: initial ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement followed by fenestration. Postoperative imaging showed cyst reduction, but a secondary VPS was necessary in both cases.

CONCLUSION

Genetic analysis is less likely to identify a monogenic etiology in non-syndromic cases of SACs, which are assumed to be multifactorial. There is no established evidence linking a teratogenic effect of anti-epileptic drugs to CNS malformations. Moreover, the surgical treatment of this complex condition constitutes a point of discussion.

Pathogenesis, management strategies, and outcome of non-communicating extradural spinal arachnoid cyst (NEAC): a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Non-communicating extradural spinal arachnoid cysts (NEACs) are extremely rare aetiology of symptomatic spinal cord compression. The aim of this study was to address their pathogenesis, optimum management strategy and outcome through systematic review of existing published studies.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

We have found 13 eligible publications by searching through PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases, published from inception to December 2020. We have analysed the data of 21 patients extracted from those 13 publications by IBM SPSS version 23.

RESULTS

According to our analysis congenital predisposition, trauma, and previous surgery history are the aetiology of NEAC. Clinical presentation of cyst depends upon the location and extent of compression or involvement of the neurovascular structures. Paraparesis with variable degree of sensory disturbance was seen among patients. Based on neuroimaging findings, NEACs are most commonly found at dorsal and dorsolumbar region. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the diagnostic modalities of choice and CT myelography can demonstrate the communication with the subarachnoid space. Recurrence rate of cyst after surgery is very low as only one out of twenty patients showed recurrence. If dural defect is not accurately addressed, the recurrence rate increased significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has highlighted aetiology, treatment strategies, and neurological outcome of NEAC. These findings may help neurosurgeons to manage this rare surgical entity for favourable outcome.

Review/Perspective On the Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Spinal Arachnoid Cysts

Background:

Spinal arachnoid cysts (SAC) are typically congenital, spontaneous, traumatic (i.e., including iatrogenic/surgical), or inflammatory in origin. In descending order, they occur in the thoracic, lumbar, and cervical spine, and originate from focal entrapment of the arachnoid membrane. Arachnoid cysts represent 1–2% of all cystic spinal masses/tumors. The majority are extradural arachnoid cysts (EDAC) while 10% of all arachnoid cysts are intradural (IDAC) including subarachnoid, or extra-arachnoidal/subdural. Only rarely are they intramedullary in location. The clinical symptoms/signs of IDAC/EDAC include; intracranial hypotension (i.e., due to continued cerebrospinal fluid drainage), radiculopathy, and/or myelopathy.

Methods:

Magnetic Resonance Images (MR) and Myelo-Computed Tomography (Myelo-CT) studies classically document the predominant dorsal location of IDAC/EDAC. They also show their extent and severity contributing to root, cord, and/or cauda equina compression. In the cervical/thoracic spine, MR/Myelo-CT studies classically show the “double cord” or “windsock” signs, while the “fake arachnoiditis sign” may be seen in the lumbar spine. The latter sign signals the presence of a circumferential extra-arachnoidal-subdural cyst that centrally “traps” the cauda equina. Note, that this resembles and is often misinterpreted as adhesive archnoiditis.

Results:

Patients with significant SAC-related neurological deficits typically warrant early surgery. That surgery includes; partial/total resection/fenestration of cyst walls, and occlusion of communicating fistulas with or without accompanying shunts.

Conclusion:

It is critical to recognize the clinical (i.e., intracranial hypotension, radiculopathy, and/or myelopathy) and radiographic MR/Myelo-CT signs (i.e., “double cord,” “windsock signs”, or “fake arachnoiditis sign”) of IDAC, EDAC, or intramedullary spinal arachnoid cysts to appropriately offer treatment. For those with significant neurological deficits, early surgery (i.e. optimally 0-< 24 hours after the onset of symptoms/signs consisting of laminectomies, partial/total cyst resection/fenestration, and ligation/occlusion of the subarachnoid-cyst fistula with or without shunt placement), is essential to avoid significant permanent neurological sequelae.

Transforaminal endoscopic excision of bi-segmental non-communicating spinal extradural arachnoid cysts: A case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Spinal extradural arachnoid cysts (SEACs) are a rare cause of spinal cord compression. Typically, these cysts communicate with the intradural subarachnoid space through a small defect in the dural sac. For symptomatic SEACs, the standard treatment is to remove the cyst in total with a (hemi)laminectomy or laminoplasty. We present a rare case of bi-segmental non-communicating SEACs and describe our experience of using an endoscopic minimal access technique to remove bi-segmental non-communicating SEACs.

CASE SUMMARY

A 79-year-old female presented with pain related to bi-segmental SEACs at the T11-L1 segments. She underwent sequential transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic thoracic cystectomy of the SEACs. Following her first procedure, spinal magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated complete excision of the cyst at the T12-L1 segment. However, the cyst at the T11-T12 segment was still present. Thus, a second procedure was performed to remove this lesion. The patient’s right-sided lumbar and abdominal pain improved significantly postoperatively. Her Japanese Orthopaedic Association score increased from 11 to 25, her visual analogue scale score was reduced from 8 to 1. The physical and mental component summary of the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) were 15.5 and 34.375 preoperatively, and had increased to 79.75 and 77.275 at the last follow-up visit, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Bi-segmental non-communicating SEACs are extremely rare. Endoscopic surgery is a safe, effective, and reliable method for treating these cysts. In the event of bi-segmental SEACs, it is important to identify whether both cysts are communicating before surgery, and if not, to remove both cysts separately during the index surgery to avoid re-operation.

Congenital Spinal Cysts: An Update and Review of the Literature

Congenital spinal cysts are rare and encompass a wide variety of diseases including arachnoid, enterogenous, teratomatous, neurenteric, foregut, bronchogenic, epithelial, ependymal, dermoid, and epidermoid cysts. Here, we elucidate the epidemiology, pathology, pathogenesis, and diagnostic findings of the most common congenital spinal cysts, followed by a discussion of their presentation and treatment options. Differentiating the cause of each lesion is crucial for targeted clinical and surgical management for the patient. Our review describes how arachnoid cysts can be observed, fenestrated, percutaneously drained, or shunted; however, the primary goal for neurenteric, dermoid, and epidermoid cysts is removal. Further, we discuss how patient presentation is dependent on the rate of growth and location of compression on the spinal cord and nerve roots. However, although many of these lesions are discovered incidentally on imaging, the spectrum of possible symptoms include pain, weakness, ataxia, bladder incontinence, and progressive or acute neurologic deficits. We present and review the histology and imaging of a variety of cysts and discuss how although the goal of treatment is resection, the risks of surgery must be considered against the benefits of complete resection in each case.

Spinal arachnoid cysts in adults: diagnosis and management. A single-center experience

OBJECTIVEAdult spinal arachnoid cysts (SACs) are rare entities of indistinct etiology that present with pain or myelopathy. Diagnosis is made on imaging studies with varying degrees of specificity. In symptomatic cases, the standard treatment involves surgical exploration and relief of neural tissue compression. The aim of this study was to illustrate features of SACs in adults, surgical management, and outcomes.METHODSThe authors searched medical records for all SACs in adults in the 10-year period ending in December 2016. Radiology and pathology reports were reviewed to exclude other spine cystic disorders. Recurrent or previously treated patients were excluded. Demographic variables (age, sex) and clinical presentation (symptoms, duration, history of infection or trauma, and examination findings) were extracted. Radiological features were collected from radiology reports and direct interpretation of imaging studies. Operative reports and media were reviewed to accurately describe the surgical technique. Finally, patient-reported outcomes were collected at every clinic visit using the SF-36.RESULTSThe authors' search identified 22 patients with SACs (mean age at presentation 53.5 years). Seventeen patients were women, representing an almost 3:1 sex distribution. Symptoms comprised back pain (n = 16, 73%), weakness (n = 10, 45%), gait ataxia (n = 11, 50%), and sphincter dysfunction (n = 4, 18%). The mean duration of symptoms was 15 months. Seven patients (32%) exhibited signs of myelopathy. All patients underwent preoperative MRI; in addition, 6 underwent CT myelography. SACs were located in the thoracic spine (n = 17, 77%), and less commonly in the lumbar spine (n = 3, 14%) and cervical/cervicothoracolumbar region (n = 2, 9%). Based on imaging findings, the cysts were interpreted as intradural SACs (n = 11, 50%), extradural SACs (n = 6, 27%), or ventral spinal cord herniation (n = 2, 9%); findings in 3 patients (14%) were inconclusive. Nineteen patients underwent surgical treatment consisting of laminoplasty in addition to cyst resection (n = 13, 68%), ligation of the connecting pedicle (n = 4, 21%), or fenestration/marsupialization (n = 2, 11%). Postoperatively, patients were followed up for an average of 8.2 months (range 2-30 months). Postoperative MRI showed complete resolution of the SAC in 14 of 16 patients. Patient-reported outcomes showed improvement in SF-36 parameters. One patient suffered a delayed wound infection.CONCLUSIONSIn symptomatic patients with imaging findings suggestive of spinal arachnoid cyst, surgical exploration and complete resection is the treatment of choice. Treatment is usually well tolerated, carries low risks, and provides the best chances for optimal recovery.

Familial arachnoid cysts: a review of 35 families

INTRODUCTION

Arachnoid cysts are commonly considered congenital lesions, but this has not been proven. With the development of neuroimaging and DNA testing technology, more cases of familial arachnoid cysts have been reported. Herein, we review such cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for case reports of arachnoid cysts published through April 2018. Case reports were included only if two or more related patients were diagnosed with an arachnoid cyst by neuroimaging or intraoperatively. For each report, the following data were extracted: first author name, date of publication, number of families, number of patients, location of the arachnoid cysts, patient age, patient sex, and genetic mutations and associated disease.

RESULTS

Our searches identified 33 case reports involving 35 families and 115 patients. The locations of arachnoid cysts were similar in 25 of the 35 families. Spinal extradural arachnoid cysts were reported most often, followed by arachnoid cysts in the middle fossa and posterior fossa. A left-sided predominance was noticed for arachnoid cysts of the middle fossa. Mutation of the FOXC2 gene was reported most often, and arachnoid cysts may be associated with mutations on chromosome 16.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the origin of arachnoid cysts is believed to have a genetic component by some researchers, the genes associated with arachnoid cysts remain unknown. Unfortunately, the evidence remains insufficient.

Microvascular Decompression and Arachnoid Cyst Fenestration for Treatment of Medulla Oblongata Compression Caused by Arachnoid Cyst-Vascular Loop Complex

BACKGROUND

Vascular compression of neural structures has long been established as an etiology for dysfunction of multiple cranial nerves. Classically, as is the case of trigeminal neuralgia, vascular compression by an offending artery and sometimes vein-exerting pressure at the root entry zone of the trigeminal nerve can lead to the characteristic pain syndrome.

CASE DESCRIPTION

In these cases, microvascular decompression is an effective, durable surgical intervention to relieve the neuralgia. In this report, we present a unique case of a patient with direct compression of the medulla oblongata by an arachnoid cyst and associated vascular loops.

CONCLUSION

Confirming our suspected pathophysiology of this case, we noted resolution of the patient's symptoms following fenestration of cyst and microvascular decompression.