Growth hormone and prolactin-staining tumors causing acromegaly: a retrospective review of clinical presentations and surgical outcomes

Growth hormone increase by luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone reflects gonadotroph-related characteristics in acromegaly

PURPOSE

We previously showed the clinical characteristics of acromegaly with a paradoxical growth hormone (GH) response to oral glucose or thyrotropin-releasing hormone. However, the clinical characteristics of acromegaly with an increased GH response to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH responders) remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics, especially gonadotroph-related characteristics of LHRH responders in acromegaly.

METHODS

The clinical characteristics of 33 LHRH responders and 81 LHRH nonresponders were compared.

RESULTS

No differences in age, sex or basal serum levels of GH, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and gonadotropin were observed between the two groups. Steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1), gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRHR), and LH expression was more frequently observed in LHRH responders (P < 0.05). In addition, a greater increased rate of GH after LHRH loading, and the proportion of GnRHR and gonadotropin expression was observed in pituitary tumor with SF-1 expression than that without the expression (P < 0.01). LHRH responders showed a greater GH decrease in the octreotide test and a greater IGF-1 decrease after first-generation somatostatin ligand than LHRH nonresponders (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the proportion of hypointense pituitary tumors on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and tumors with densely granulated type was higher in LHRH responders than in LHRH nonresponders, respectively (P < 0.05). No difference between the two groups was observed in either somatostatin receptor 2 or 5 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased GH response to LHRH is associated with the gonadotroph-related characteristics. This response may reflect the biological characteristics of somatotroph tumors.

Effectiveness of combined first-line medical treatment in acromegaly with prolactin cosecretion

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare the response to first-line medical treatment in treatment-naive acromegaly patients with pure growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma (GH-PA) and those with GH and prolactin cosecreting PA (GH&PRL-PA).

DESIGN

This is a retrospective multicentric study of acromegaly patients followed from 2003 to 2023 in 33 tertiary Spanish hospitals with at least 6 months of first-line medical treatment.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics, first-line medical treatment strategies, and outcomes were analyzed. We employed a multiple logistic regression full model to estimate the impact of some baseline characteristics on disease control after each treatment modality.

RESULTS

Of the 144 patients included, 72.9% had a GH-PA, and 27.1% had a GH&PRL-PA. Patients with GH&PRL-PA were younger (43.9 ± 15.0 vs 51.9 ± 12.7 years, P < .01) and harboring more frequently macroadenomas (89.7% vs 72.1%, P = .03). First-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (fgSRL) as monotherapy was given to 106 (73.6%) and a combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline in the remaining 38 (26.4%). Patients with GH&PRL-PA received more frequently a combination therapy (56.4% vs 15.2%, P < .01). After 6 months of treatment, in the group of patients under fgSRL as monotherapy, those patients with GH&PRL-PA had worse control compared to GH-PAs (29.4% vs 55.1%, P = .04). However, these differences in the rate of disease control between both groups disappeared when both received combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline.

CONCLUSION

In GH&PRL-PA, the biochemical control achieved with fgSRL as monotherapy is substantially worse than in patients harboring GH-PA, supporting the inclusion of cabergoline as first-line medical treatment in combination with fgSRLs in these subgroups of patients.

A single-center experience of transsphenoidal endoscopic surgery for acromegaly in 73 patients: results and predictive factors for remission

BACKGROUND

Transsphenoidal endoscopic surgery is the first-line treatment for growth hormone-secreting adenomas.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the results of the transsphenoidal endoscopic approach for acromegaly and to determine the predictive factors of remission.

METHODS

A single-centre retrospective review was performed in patients who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly between January 2009 and January 2019. Demographic features, clinical presentation, histopathology records, complications and pre- and postoperative radiologic and endocrinological assessments were evaluated. The factors that influenced the remission rates were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients underwent surgery via the transsphenoidal endoscopic approach. Cavernous sinus invasion was detected in 32 patients (43.8%); and macroadenoma, in 57 (78%). The pathology specimens of the 27 patients (36.9%) showed dual-staining adenomas with prolactin. A total of 51 patients (69.8%) attained biochemical remission 1 year after surgery. A second operation was performed in 10 patients (13.6%) with residual tumours without biochemical remission in the first year. Six (60%) of the patients attained remission at the last follow-up. Transient diabetes insipidus was observed in 18 patients (24.6%); and rhinorrhoea, which was resolved with conservative treatment, in 4 (5.4%). None of the patients developed panhypopituitarism. The presence of cavernous sinus invasion and preoperative IGF-1, immediate postoperative GH and third-month IGF-1 levels were predictive of remission.

CONCLUSION

Transsphenoidal endoscopic surgery is a safe and effective treatment for acromegaly. Reoperation should be considered in patients with residual tumours without remission.

Differences between GH and PRL co-secreting and GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. A series of 604 cases

PURPOSE

To evaluate differences in clinical presentation and in surgical outcomes between growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas (GH-PAs) and GH and prolactin co-secreting pituitary adenomas (GH&PRL-PAs).

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective study of 604 patients with acromegaly submitted to pituitary surgery. Patients were classified into two groups according to serum PRL levels at diagnosis and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PRL: a) GH&PRL-PAs when PRL levels were above the upper limit of normal and IHC for GH and PRL was positive or PRL levels were >100ng/and PRL IHC was not available (n=130) and b) GH-PAs who did not meet the previously mentioned criteria (n=474).

RESULTS

GH&PRL-PAs represented 21.5% (n=130) of patients with acromegaly. The mean age at diagnosis was lower in GH&PRL-PAs than in GH-PAs (P<0.001). GH&PRL-PAs were more frequently macroadenomas (90.6% vs. 77.4%, P=0.001) and tended to be more invasive (33.6% vs. 24.7%, P=0.057) than GH-PAs. Furthermore, they had presurgical hypopituitarism more frequently (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.83-4.38). IGF-1 upper limit of normality (ULN) levels at diagnosis were lower in patients with GH&PRL-PAs (median 2.4 [IQR 1.73-3.29] vs. 2.7 [IQR 1.91-3.67], P=0.023). There were no differences in the immediate (41.1% vs 43.3%, P=0.659) or long-term post-surgical acromegaly biochemical cure rate (53.5% vs. 53.1%, P=0.936) between groups. However, there was a higher incidence of permanent arginine-vasopressin deficiency (AVP-D) (7.3% vs. 2.4%, P=0.011) in GH&PRL-PAs patients.

CONCLUSIONS

GH&PRL-PAs are responsible for 20% of acromegaly cases. These tumors are more invasive, larger and cause hypopituitarism more frequently than GH-PAs and are diagnosed at an earlier age. The biochemical cure rate is similar between both groups, but patients with GH&PRL-PAs tend to develop permanent postsurgical AVP-D more frequently.

Prolactin and Growth Hormone Signaling and Interlink Focused on the Mammosomatotroph Paradigm: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) are peptide hormones that bind to the class 1 cytokine receptor superfamily, a highly conserved cell surface class of receptors. Both hormones control their own secretion via a negative autocrine loop in their own mammosomatotroph, lactotroph or somatotroph. In this regard, GH and PRL are regulated by similar signaling pathways involving cell growth and hormone secretion. Thus, GH and PRL dysregulation and pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) development may have common pathogenic pathways. Based on cell linage, lactotroph and somatotroph PitNETs come from pituitary-specific POU-class homeodomain transcription factor (Pit-1). Mammosomatotroph and plurihormonal PitNETs are a unique subtype of PitNETs that arise from a single-cell population of Pit-1 lineage. In contrast, mixed somatotroph-lactotroph PitNETs are composed of two distinct cell populations: somatotrophs and lactotrophs. Morphologic features that distinguish indolent PitNETs from locally aggressive ones are still unidentified, and no single prognostic parameter can predict tumor aggressiveness or treatment response. In this review, we aim to explore the latest research on lactotroph and somatotroph PitNETs, the molecular mechanisms involved in PRL and GH axis regulation and the signaling pathways involved in their aggressiveness, particularly focused on mammosomatotroph and mixed subtypes. Finally, we summarize epidemiological, clinical, and radiological features of these exceptional tumors. We aim to shed light, from basic to clinical settings, on new perspectives and scientific gaps in this field.

Acromegaly: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management

Growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas that cause acromegaly arise as monoclonal expansions of differentiated somatotroph cells and are usually sporadic. They are almost invariably benign, yet they can be locally invasive and show progressive growth despite treatment. Persistent excess of both growth hormone and its target hormone insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) results in a wide array of cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic, musculoskeletal, neurological, and neoplastic comorbidities that might not be reversible with disease control. Normalisation of IGF-1 and growth hormone are the primary therapeutic aims; additional treatment goals include tumour shrinkage, relieving symptoms, managing complications, reducing excess morbidity, and improving quality of life. A multimodal approach with surgery, medical therapy, and (more rarely) radiation therapy is required to achieve these goals. In this Review, we examine the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, complications, and treatment of acromegaly, with an emphasis on the importance of tailoring management strategies to each patient to optimise outcomes.

Machine learning as a clinical decision support tool for patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

To develop machine learning (ML) models that predict postoperative remission, remission at last visit, and resistance to somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL) in patients with acromegaly and to determine the clinical features associated with the prognosis.

METHODS

We studied outcomes using the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) values, which were reported as the performance metric. To determine the importance of each feature and easy interpretation, Shapley Additive explanations (SHAP) values, which help explain the outputs of ML models, are used.

RESULTS

One-hundred fifty-two patients with acromegaly were included in the final analysis. The mean AUROC values resulting from 100 independent replications were 0.728 for postoperative 3 months remission status classification, 0.879 for remission at last visit classification, and 0.753 for SRL resistance status classification. Extreme gradient boosting model demonstrated that preoperative growth hormone (GH) level, age at operation, and preoperative tumor size were the most important predictors for early remission; resistance to SRL and preoperative tumor size represented the most important predictors of remission at last visit, and postoperative 3-month insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and GH levels (random and nadir) together with the sparsely granulated somatotroph adenoma subtype served as the most important predictors of SRL resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

ML models may serve as valuable tools in the prediction of remission and SRL resistance.

Clinical, hormonal and pathomorphological markers of somatotroph pituitary neuroendocrine tumors predicting the treatment outcome in acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Transsphenoidal adenomectomy (TSS) of somatotroph pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) is the first-line treatment of acromegaly. Pharmacological treatment is recommended if surgery is contraindicated or did not lead to disease remission. The choice of treatment best fitting each patient should be based on thorough investigation of patients' characteristics. The current analysis attempts to create a tool for personalized treatment planning.

AIM

This study aimed to assess whether clinical, biochemical, imaging and pathological characteristics can predict surgical remission and response to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) and pasireotide-LAR in acromegaly.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 153 acromegaly patients, treated in the Department of Endocrinology in Bielanski Hospital in Warsaw, Poland was performed. Data on demographics, hormonal and imaging results, pathological evaluation, and treatment outcome was extracted from the Polish Acromegaly Registry collecting information from 11 endocrinology centers in Poland and analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with surgical remission had lower GH and IGF-1 concentrations at diagnosis (median GH 5.5 µg/L [IQR: 3.1-16.0] vs. 19.9 µg/L [IQR: 9.8-42.4], p=<0.001 and mean IGF-1 3.1xULN ± SD=1.2 vs. 3.7xULN ± SD=1.2, p=0.007, respectively) and smaller tumors (median 12.5mm [IQR: 9-19] vs. 23mm [IQR: 18-30], p<0.001). These tumors were more often densely granulated (DG) (73.2% vs. 40.0%, p=0.001) with positive staining for alpha-subunit (α-SU) (58.3% vs. 35.5%, p=0.021) and lower Ki-67 index (p=0.002). Patients responding well to SRLs were more often male (55.6% vs 44.4%, p=0.026), presented lower GH concentration (median GH 17.2 µg/L [IQR: 6.2-29.0] vs. 23.8 µg/L [IQR: 11.2-49.5], p=0.048) and had more often DG tumors (63.0% vs. 14.3%, p<0.001). No significant differences between good and poor-response to pasireotide-LAR groups were found. In multivariate logistic regression analysis fasting GH concentration <8.63 µg/L, maximal tumor diameter <15.5mm, normoprolactinemia and DG tumor turned out to be independent predictors of surgical remission (OR=0.92, p=0.026; OR=0.87, p=0.069, OR=3.86, p=0.096 and OR=3.05, p=0.181, respectively). Fasting GH concentration <36.6 µg/L and DG tumor turned out to be independent predictors of good response to first-generation SRLs (OR=0.96, p=0.06 and OR=10.68, p=0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Younger age at diagnosis, male sex, lower GH, IGF-1 and PRL concentrations, smaller tumor size at diagnosis as well as positive α-SU staining, lower Ki-67 index and DG tumors predicted better treatment outcome in acromegaly patients.

Clinical and epidemiological characteristics, morbidity and treatment based on the registry of acromegalic patients in Colombia: RAPACO

AIMS

Describe the local characteristics, methodology and results of the registry of acromegalic patients in Colombia (RAPACO).

METHODS

Multicenter, retrospective study based on the registry of acromegalic patients in Colombia: RAPACO. The data collected included: demographics, diagnosis, approximate time of disease evolution, data on weight, height, body mass index (BMI), neck circumference (NC) abdominal circumference (AC) hip circumference (HC) and waist/hip ratio (WHR); clinical and biochemical data at the time of diagnosis, etiology, immunohistochemistry of the tumor and information related to types of treatment. Descriptive analytics were employed.

RESULTS

A total of 201 patients (60% females) with an average age at registration of 49.5 ± 14.6 years and an average time of evolution of the disease of 6.96 ± 4.5 years. Average weight was 75.1 Kg ± 12.98, with an average BMI of 28.11 ± 4.33. The most frequent symptoms mentioned at the time of diagnosis were extremity enlargement and headache. The most frequent comorbidity was arterial hypertension in 50.3% of the cases. 78.6% of cases were caused by macroadenoma. 80.1% received surgical treatment, 77.6% were under medical treatment, of which 95.7% were receiving somatostatin analogues. 26.4% of patients were treated with radiation therapy. Of the patients who received any type of clinical treatment, only 2.5% reported biochemical control at registration.

CONCLUSION

It is important to recognize the local epidemiological, clinical, biochemical and treatment characteristics in order to assist in further understanding this pathology to implement local measures to improve both the quality of life as well as the prognosis of the patients diagnosed.

Association of different pathologic subtypes of growth hormone producing pituitary adenoma and remission in acromegaly patients: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Regarding the inconclusive results of previous investigations, this study aimed to determine the association between pathology, as a possible predictor, with remission outcomes, to know the role of pathology in the personalized decision making in acromegaly patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on the consecutive surgeries for growth hormone (GH) producing pituitary adenomas from February 2015 to January 2021. Seventy-one patients were assessed for granulation patterns and prolactin co-expression as dual staining adenomas. The role of pathology and some other predictors on surgical remission was evaluated using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Among 71 included patients, 34 (47.9%) patients had densely granulated (DG), 14 (19.7%) had sparsely granulated (SG), 23 (32.4%) had dual staining pituitary adenomas. The remission rate was about 62.5% in the patients with SG and DG adenomas named single staining and 52.2% in dual staining groups. Postoperative remission was 1.53-folds higher in the single staining adenomas than dual staining-one (non-significant). The remission rate was doubled in DG group compared to two other groups (non-significant). By adjusting different predictors, cavernous sinus invasion and one-day postoperative GH levels decreased remission rate by 91% (95% CI: 0.01-0.67; p = 0.015) and 64% (95% CI: 0.19-0.69; p < 0.001), respectively. Responses to the medications were not significantly different among three groups.

CONCLUSION

Various pathological subtypes of pituitary adenomas do not appear to have a predictive role in estimating remission outcomes. Cavernous sinus invasion followed by one-day postoperative GH is the strongest parameter to predict biochemical remission.

Predictors of postoperative biochemical remission in acromegaly

PURPOSE

Acromegaly is a rare neuroendocrine condition that can lead to significant morbidity. Despite China's vast population size, studies on acromegaly remain sparse. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and predictors of biochemical remission after surgery for acromegaly using the China Acromegaly Patient Association (CAPA) database.

METHODS

A retrospective nationwide study was conducted using patient-reported data from CAPA database between 1998 and 2018. The principal component analysis (PCA) and logistic regression analysis were employed to determine independent predictors of biochemical remission at 3 months in patients after surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 546 surgical cases (mean age: 36.8 years; 59.5% females), macroadenomas and invasive tumors (Knosp score 3-4) were 83.9% and 64.1%, respectively. Ninety-five percent of patients were treated with endonasal surgery and 36.8% exhibited biochemical remission at 3-months postoperatively. The following independent predictors of biochemical remission were identified: preoperative growth hormone (GH) levels between 12 and 28 μg/L [odds ratio (OR) = 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.92; p = 0.021], preoperative GH levels > 28 μg/L (OR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.88; p = 0.013), macroadenoma (OR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.96; p = 0.034), giant adenomas (OR = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.05-0.38; p < 0.001), Knosp score 3-4 (OR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.24-0.57; p < 0.001), and preoperative medication usage (OR = 2.32; 95% CI, 1.46-3.70; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide study spanning over two decades, we highlight that higher preoperative GH levels, large tumor size, and greater extent of tumor invasiveness are associated with a lower likelihood of biochemical remission at 3-months after surgery, while preoperative medical therapy increases the chance of remission.

Cystic appearance on magnetic resonance imaging in bihormonal growth hormone and prolactin tumors in acromegaly

PURPOSE

To investigate demographic, imaging and laboratory characteristics, and treatment outcomes of acromegaly patients who have bihormonal (BA) growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) immunoreactive adenomas compared to patients who have densely granulated GH adenomas (DGA) and sparsely granulated GH adenomas (SGA).

METHODS

Retrospective review of single-center surgically treated acromegaly patients; pathology was analyzed by a single neuropathologist using 2017 WHO criteria. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was assessed to evaluate tumor size, cystic component, invasion and T2 signal intensity.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients; 19 BA (9 mammosomatotroph and 10 mixed GH and PRL adenomas) were compared with 30 DGA, and 28 SGA. Patients with BA were older than SGA (49.6 vs 38.5 years, p = 0.035), had a higher IGF-1 index (3.3 vs 2.3, p = 0.040) and tumors were less frequently invasive (15.8% vs 57.1%, p = 0.005). BA more frequently had a cystic component on MRI than both SGA and DGA (52.6% vs 14.3%, and 22%, p = 0.005 and 0.033, respectively). When all histological types were combined, biochemical remission postoperatively was more common in non-cystic than cystic tumors (50% vs 22.5%, p = 0.042). Somatostatin receptor ligand response rate was 66.7%, 90.9% and 37.5% in BA, DGA and SGA patients, respectively (p = 0.053).

CONCLUSION

Imaging characteristics are an increasingly important adenoma behavior determinant. An adenoma cystic component may suggest that a GH adenoma is a BA. Cystic tumors exhibited lower rates of surgical remission in this series; therefore, optimized individual patient treatment is needed, as patients could be candidates for primary medical treatment.

Prognostic factors of biochemical remission after transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: a structured review

PURPOSE

Biochemical control is the main determinant of survival, clinical manifestations and comorbidities in acromegaly. Transsphenoidal selective adenomectomy (TSA) is the initial treatment of choice with reported biochemical remission rates varying between 32 and 85%. Understanding the limiting factors is essential for identification of patients who require medical treatment.

METHODS

We reviewed the English literature published in Medline/Pubmed until Dec 31, 2019 to identify eligible studies that described outcomes of TSA as primary therapy and performed analyses to determine the main predictors of remission.

RESULTS

Most publications reported single-institution, retrospective studies. The following preoperative parameters were consistently associated with lower remission rates: cavernous sinus invasion by imaging, larger tumor size and higher GH levels. Young age and preoperative IGF-1 levels were predictive in some studies. When controlled for covariates, the best single preoperative predictor was cavernous sinus invasion, followed by preoperative GH levels. Conversely, low GH level in the first few days postoperatively was a robust predictor of durable remission. The influence of tumor histology (sparsely granular pattern, co-expression of prolactin and proliferation markers) on surgical remission remains to be established. Few studies developed predictive models that yielded much higher predictive values than individual parameters.

CONCLUSION

Surgical outcome prognostication systems could be further generated by machine learning algorithms in order to support development and implementation of personalized care in patients with acromegaly.

The Role of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Pituitary Adenomas Tumorigenesis

Pituitary adenomas (PAs) are among the most common intracranial neoplasms, but despite their histologically benign nature, these tumors sometimes grow large enough to cause symptoms of mass effect such as vision loss, headaches, or hypopituitarism. When they get this large, surgery will unfortunately not be curative and, other than prolactinomas, medical options are limited, and radiation has variable efficacy in controlling growth. Understanding the genetic perturbations, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), that promote the formation or growth of functional and nonfunctional PAs is important because such genetic insights could improve the diagnosis and subsequent classification of PAs as well as unlock potential therapeutic targets outside contemporary standard of care. While there have been great strides in the research of SNPs as drivers of PA formation and maintenance, a comprehensive discussion of these genetic mutations has not been undertaken. In the present article, and with the goal of providing scientists and clinicians a central review, we sought to summarize the current literature on SNPs and their relationship to PA formation. Across multiple tumor types, such as nonfunctioning PAs, prolactinomas, corticotroph adenomas, somatotroph adenomas, thyrotropic adenomas, and gonadotroph adenomas, SNPs in cell surface receptors implicated in proliferation can be appreciated. Polymorphisms found in tumor suppressors and cell cycle regulators have also been identified, such as p53 SNPs in nonfunctioning PAs or cyclin D1 in prolactinomas. While the translational relevance of SNPs in the formation of PAs is still in the early stages, the use of wide-scale genomic analysis to identify patients at risk for developing PAs could yield therapeutic benefit in the future.

The Clinicopathological Spectrum of Acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly results from a persistent excess in growth hormone with clinical features that may be subtle or severe. The most common cause of acromegaly is a pituitary tumor that causes excessive production of growth hormone (GH), and rare cases are due to an excess of the GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) or the ectopic production of GH.

OBJECTIVE

Discuss the different diseases that present with manifestations of GH excess and clinical acromegaly, emphasizing the distinct clinical and radiological characteristics of the different pathological entities.

METHODS

We performed a narrative review of the published clinicopathological information about acromegaly. An English-language search for relevant studies was conducted on PubMed from inception to 1 August 2019. The reference lists of relevant studies were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Pituitary tumors that cause GH excess have several variants, including pure somatotroph tumors that can be densely or sparsely granulated, or plurihormonal tumors that include mammosomatotroph, mixed somatotroph-lactotroph tumors and mature plurihomonal Pit1-lineage tumors, acidophil stem cell tumors and poorly-differentiated Pit1-lineage tumors. Each tumor type has a distinct pathophysiology, resulting in variations in clinical manifestations, imaging and responses to therapies.

CONCLUSION

Detailed clinicopathological information will be useful in the era of precision medicine, in which physicians tailor the correct treatment modality to each patient.

Mammosomatotroph and mixed somatotroph-lactotroph adenoma in acromegaly: a retrospective study with long-term follow-up

PURPOSE

Although well-documented from pathological aspect, the clinical features and outcomes of acromegaly with mammosomatotroph (MSA) and mixed somatotroph-lactotroph adenoma (MSLA) are seldom reported. Thus, in this study, we analyzed and reported the clinical data about MSAs and MSLAs.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with acromegaly in our institution during 2008-2017. Growth hormone (GH)-secreting adenomas were categorized into pure somatotroph adenoma (PSA), MSA and MSLA based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Clinical information and treatment outcomes during follow-up were analyzed by univariate and multivariate methods.

RESULTS

Among 94 patients within this cohort, PSAs, MSAs, and MSLAs accounted for 53, 28 and 13 cases, respectively. MSAs often had smaller size, lower frequency of cavernous sinus invasion and higher gross total resection (GTR) rate. MSLAs were characterized by bigger tumor size, higher frequency of preoperative hyperprolactinemia, and lower GTR rate. Thus, MSLAs had worse long-term biological remission rate than MSAs and PSAs (15.4% vs. 50.0% and 26.4%, p = 0.0371). Gender (male, OR = 0.784, p = 0.011) and tumor volume (OR = 0.784, p = 0.020) were independent predictors for long-term biological remission in binary logistic regression. Subgroup analyses indicated that postoperative nadir GH level (GH-7, HR = 1.242, p = 0.001) was the only risk factor for tumor recurrence for patients with GTR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide valuable insights into clinicopathological features of acromegaly. MSAs were relatively smaller lesions with better prognosis. MSLAs were more aggressive with massive size, invasiveness and preoperative hyperprolactinemia. Tumor size and GH-7 were significantly associated with biological remission and tumor relapse after GTR, respectively.