Robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography in children

A Multivariate Approach to Quantifying Risk Factors Impacting Stereotactic Robotic-Guided Stereoelectroencephalography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an important method for invasive monitoring to establish surgical candidacy in approximately half of refractory epilepsy patients. Identifying factors affecting lead placement can mitigate potential surgical risks. This study applies multivariate analyses to identify perioperative factors affecting stereotactic electrode placement.

METHODS

We collected registration and accuracy data for consecutive patients undergoing SEEG implantation between May 2022 and November 2023. Stereotactic robotic guidance, using intraoperative imaging and a novel frame-based fiducial, was used for planning and SEEG implantation. Entry-point (EE), target-point (TE), and angular errors were measured, and statistical univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven refractory epilepsy patients (aged 15-57 years) undergoing SEEG were reviewed. Sixteen patients had unilateral implantation (10 left-sided, 6 right-sided); 11 patients underwent bilateral implantation. The mean number of electrodes per patient was 18 (SD = 3) with an average registration mean error of 0.768 mm (SD = 0.108). Overall, 486 electrodes were reviewed. Univariate analysis showed significant correlations of lead error with skull thickness (EE: P = .003; TE: P = .012); entry angle (EE: P < .001; TE: P < .001; angular error: P = .030); lead length (TE: P = .020); and order of electrode implantation (EE: P = .003; TE: P = .001). Three multiple linear regression models were used. All models featured predictors of implantation region (157 temporal, 241 frontal, 79 parietal, 9 occipital); skull thickness (mean = 5.80 mm, SD = 2.97 mm); order (range: 1-23); and entry angle in degrees (mean = 75.47, SD = 11.66). EE and TE error models additionally incorporated lead length (mean = 44.08 mm, SD = 13.90 mm) as a predictor. Implantation region and entry angle were significant predictors of error (P ≤ .05).

CONCLUSION

Our study identified 2 primary predictors of SEEG lead error, region of implantation and entry angle, with nonsignificant contributions from lead length or order of electrode placement. Future considerations for SEEG may consider varying regional approaches and angles for more optimal accuracy in lead placement.

Usefulness of Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSA®) Device for Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the efficiency and safety of using the Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSA®) device (Zimmer Biomet; Warsaw, IN, USA) for stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrode implantation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a literature search was carried out. Overall, 855 nonduplicate relevant articles were determined, and 15 of them were selected for analysis. The benefits of the ROSA® device use in terms of electrode placement accuracy, as well as operative time length, perioperative complications, and seizure outcomes, were evaluated. Studies that were included reported on a total of 11,257 SEEG electrode implantations. The limited number of comparative studies hindered the comprehensive evaluation of the electrode implantation accuracy. Compared with frame-based or navigation-assisted techniques, ROSA®-assisted SEEG electrode implantation provided significant benefits for reduction of both overall operative time (mean difference [MD], -63.45 min; 95% confidence interval [CI] from -88.73 to -38.17 min; P < 0.00001) and operative time per implanted electrode (MD, -8.79 min; 95% CI from -14.37 to -3.21 min; P = 0.002). No significant differences existed in perioperative complications and seizure outcomes after the application of the ROSA® device and other techniques for electrode implantation. To conclude, the available evidence shows that the ROSA® device is an effective and safe surgical tool for trajectory-guided SEEG electrode implantation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, offering benefits for saving operative time and neither increasing the risk of perioperative complications nor negatively impacting seizure outcomes.

Lesion detection in epilepsy surgery: Lessons from a prospective evaluation of a machine learning algorithm

AIM

To evaluate a lesion detection algorithm designed to detect focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) in children undergoing stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) as part of their presurgical evaluation for drug-resistant epilepsy.

METHOD

This was a prospective, single-arm, interventional study (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Long-Term Follow-Up phase 1/2a). After routine SEEG planning, structural magnetic resonance imaging sequences were run through an FCD lesion detection algorithm to identify putative clusters. If the top three clusters were not already sampled, up to three additional SEEG electrodes were added. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients who had additional electrode contacts in the SEEG-defined seizure-onset zone (SOZ).

RESULTS

Twenty patients (median age 12 years, range 4-18 years) were enrolled, one of whom did not undergo SEEG. Additional electrode contacts were part of the SOZ in 1 out of 19 patients while 3 out of 19 patients had clusters that were part of the SOZ but they were already implanted. A total of 16 additional electrodes were implanted in nine patients and there were no adverse events from the additional electrodes.

INTERPRETATION

We demonstrate early-stage prospective clinical validation of a machine learning lesion detection algorithm used to aid the identification of the SOZ in children undergoing SEEG. We share key lessons learnt from this evaluation and emphasize the importance of robust prospective evaluation before routine clinical adoption of such algorithms.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

The focal cortical dysplasia detection algorithm collocated with the seizure-onset zone (SOZ) in 4 out of 19 patients. The algorithm changed the resection boundaries in 1 of 19 patients undergoing stereoelectroencephalography for drug-resistant epilepsy. The patient with an altered resection due to the algorithm was seizure-free 1 year after resective surgery. Overall, the algorithm did not increase the proportion of patients in whom SOZ was identified.

Pediatric Neurostimulation and Practice Evolution

Since the late nineteenth century, the prevailing view of epilepsy surgery has been to identify a seizure focus in a medically refractory patient and eradicate it. Sadly, only a select number of the many who suffer from uncontrolled seizures benefit from this approach. With the development of safe, efficient stereotactic methods and targeted surgical therapies that can affect deep structures and modulate broad networks in diverse disorders, epilepsy surgery in children has undergone a paradigmatic evolutionary change. With modern diagnostic techniques such as stereo electroencephalography combined with closed loop neuromodulatory systems, pediatric epilepsy surgery can reach a much broader population of underserved patients.

Accuracy and Utility of Frameless Stereotactic Placement of Stereoelectroencephalography Electrodes

BACKGROUND

Successful surgery for epilepsy hinges on identification of the epileptogenic focus. Stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) is the most effective way to identify most seizure foci. There are multiple methods of inserting depth electrodes, including frame-based, frameless, and robot-assisted techniques. Studies have shown the accuracy of frame-based and robotic-assisted techniques to be statistically similar, while only one study has detailed the frameless sEEG insertion technique.

METHODS

Patients underwent placement of sEEG depth electrodes using frameless stereotaxy from September 2019 to September 2021 at Geisinger Medical Center by a single surgeon. Seizure history, electrode placement accuracy relative to the planned trajectories, surgical times, success rate of identifying the epileptogenic focus, and subsequent seizure control rates after surgical treatment were documented.

RESULTS

Data were available for 21 patients and 181 electrodes inserted using the VarioGuide frameless stereotactic system. Each insertion took an average of 14.5 minutes per lead. Average entry variance was 2.7 mm with an average target variance of 4.6 mm. The epileptogenic focus was identified in 19 of 21 patients, and further surgical treatment was performed in 18 of 21 patients (85.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

VarioGuide frameless stereotaxy for sEEG placement is comparable to frame-based and robotic-assisted techniques with statistically similar rates of epileptic focus identification. Lead placement accuracy is slightly lower and time per lead is slightly higher relative to robot-assisted surgeries. When a robot system is unavailable, surgeons can consider using a frameless stereotactic technique for sEEG insertion, allowing patients to benefit from a similarly high rate of epileptic zone identification.

Accuracy of Depth Electrodes is Not Time-Dependent in Robot-Assisted Stereoelectroencephalography in a Pediatric Population

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) is steadily supplanting traditional frameless and frame-based modalities for minimally invasive depth electrode placement in epilepsy workup. Accuracy rates similar to gold-standard frame-based techniques have been achieved, with improved operative efficiency. Limitations in cranial fixation and placement of trajectories in pediatric patients are believed to contribute to a time-dependent accumulation of stereotactic error. Thus, we aim to study the impact of time as a marker of cumulative stereotactic error during robotic sEEG.

METHODS

All patients between October 2018 and June 2022 who underwent robotic sEEG were included. Radial errors at entry and target points as well as depth and Euclidean distance errors were collected for each electrode, excluding those with errors over 10 mm. Target point errors were standardized by planned trajectory length. ANOVA and error rates over time were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria for a total of 539 trajectories. Number of electrodes placed ranged from 6 to 22. Average root mean squared error was 0.45 ± 0.12 mm. Average entry, target, depth, and Euclidean distance errors were 1.12 ± 0.41 mm, 1.46 ± 0.44 mm, -1.06 ± 1.43 mm, and 3.01 ± 0.71 mm, respectively. There was no significant increased error with each sequential electrode placed (entry error P -value = .54, target error P -value = .13, depth error P -value = .22, Euclidean distance P -value = .27).

CONCLUSION

No decremental accuracy over time was observed. This may be secondary to our workflow which prioritizes oblique and longer trajectories first and then into less error-prone trajectories. Further study on the effect of level of training may reveal a novel difference in error rates.

Use of the Globus ExcelsiusGPS System for Robotic Stereoelectroencephalography: An Initial Experience

BACKGROUND

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a critical tool used in the identification of epileptogenic zones. Although stereotactic frame-based SEEG procedures have been performed traditionally, newer robotic-assisted SEEG procedures have become increasingly common. In this study, we evaluate the accuracy, efficacy of the ExcelsiusGPS robot (Globus Medica, Audubon, PA) in SEEG procedures.

METHODS

Five consecutive adult patients with drug resistant epilepsy were identified as SEEG candidates via a multidisciplinary epilepsy surgery committee. Preoperative scans were merged onto the robot to plan electrode placement. With the use of a camera system, dynamic reference base, and surveillance markers, the robotic arm was used to establish the trajectory of the electrodes. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were merged onto the preoperatively planned trajectory and the radial, depth, and entry errors were calculated. Fiducial registration error was calculated for 4 cases to determine error between the patient and intraoperative CT merge.

RESULTS

A total of 59 electrodes were placed. The mean age at surgery was 41.6 ± 15.1 years. Mean operating room time, anesthesia time, and surgical time was 301.6 ± 44.4 min, 261.6 ± 50.2 min, and 155.8 ± 48.8 min, respectively. The overall mean depth, radial, and entry errors were 2.5 ± 1.9 mm, 1.9 ± 1.5 mm, and 1.6 ± 1.2 mm. Mean fiducial registration error retrospectively calculated for 4 of 5 cases was 0.13 ± 0.04 mm. There were no perioperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial performance of the ExcelsiusGPS robotic system yielded comparable results to other systems currently in use for adult SEEG procedures.

Responsive neurostimulation for pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: a case series and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is a promising treatment for pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy for whom resective surgery is not an option. The relative indications and risk for pediatric patients undergoing RNS therapy require further investigation. Here, the authors report their experience with RNS implantation and therapy in pediatric patients.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective chart review to identify patients implanted with RNS depth or strip electrodes for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy at their institution between 2020 and 2022. Patient demographics, surgical variables, and patient seizure outcomes (Engel class and International League Against Epilepsy [ILAE] reporting) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The authors identified 20 pediatric patients ranging in age from 8 to 21 years (mean 15 [SD 4] years), who underwent RNS implantation, including depth electrodes (n = 15), strip electrodes (n = 2), or both (n = 3). Patient seizure semiology, onset, and implantation strategy were heterogeneous, including bilateral centromedian nucleus (n = 5), mesial temporal lobe (n = 4), motor cortex or supplementary motor area (n = 7), or within an extratemporal epileptogenic zone (n = 4). There were no acute complications of RNS implantation (hemorrhage or stroke) or device malfunctions. One patient required rehospitalization for postoperative infection. At the longest follow-up (mean 10 [SD 7] months), 13% patients had Engel class IIB, 38% had Engel class IIIA, 6% had Engel class IIIB, 19% had Engel class IVA, 19% had Engel class IVB, and 6% had Engel class IVC outcomes. Using ILAE metrics, 6% were ILAE class 3, 25% were ILAE class 4, and 69% were ILAE class 5.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series supports current literature suggesting that RNS is a safe and potentially effective surgical intervention for pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. The authors report comparable rates of serious adverse events to current RNS literature in pediatric and adult populations. Seizure outcomes may continue to improve with follow-up as stimulation strategy is refined and the chronic neuromodulatory effect evolves, as previously described in patients with RNS. Further large-scale, multicenter case series of RNS in pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy are required to determine long-term pediatric safety and effectiveness.

Stereoelectroencephalography before 2 years of age

OBJECTIVE

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a widely used technique for localizing seizure onset zones prior to resection. However, its use has traditionally been avoided in children under 2 years of age because of concerns regarding pin fixation in the immature skull, intraoperative and postoperative electrode bolt security, and stereotactic registration accuracy. In this retrospective study, the authors describe their experience using SEEG in patients younger than 2 years of age, with a focus on the procedure’s safety, feasibility, and accuracy as well as surgical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of children under 2 years of age who had undergone SEEG while at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia between November 2017 and July 2021 was performed. Data on clinical characteristics, surgical procedure, imaging results, electrode accuracy measurements, and postoperative outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Five patients younger than 2 years of age underwent SEEG during the study period (median age 20 months, range 17–23 months). The mean age at seizure onset was 9 months. Developmental delay was present in all patients, and epilepsy-associated genetic diagnoses included tuberous sclerosis (n = 1), KAT6B (n = 1), and NPRL3 (n = 1). Cortical lesions included tubers from tuberous sclerosis (n = 1), mesial temporal sclerosis (n = 1), and cortical dysplasia (n = 3). The mean number of placed electrodes was 11 (range 6–20 electrodes). Bilateral electrodes were placed in 1 patient. Seizure onset zones were identified in all cases. There were no SEEG-related complications, including skull fracture, electrode misplacement, hemorrhage, infection, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, electrode pullout, neurological deficit, or death. The mean target point error for all electrodes was 1.0 mm. All patients proceeded to resective surgery, with a mean follow-up of 21 months (range 8–53 months). All patients attained a favorable epilepsy outcome, including Engel class IA (n = 2), IC (n = 1), ID (n = 1), and IIA (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

SEEG can be safely, accurately, and effectively utilized in children under age 2 with good postoperative outcomes using standard SEEG equipment. With minimal modification, this procedure is feasible in those with immature skulls and guides the epilepsy team’s decision-making for early and optimal treatment of refractory epilepsy through effective localization of seizure onset zones.

Subdural electrodes versus stereoelectroencephalography for pediatric epileptogenic zone localization: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the relative safety and effectiveness of invasive monitoring with subdural electrodes (SDEs) and stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) in pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in 176 patients who underwent invasive monitoring evaluations at UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh between January 2000 and September 2021. To examine differences between SDE and sEEG groups, independent-samples t-tests for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square tests for categorical variables were performed. A p value < 0.1 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were 134 patients (76%) in the SDE group and 42 (24%) in the sEEG group. There was a difference in the proportion with complications (17.9% in the SDE group vs 7.1% in the sEEG group, p = 0.09) and resection (75.4% SDE vs 21.4% sEEG, p < 0.01) between SDE and sEEG patients. However, there was no observable difference in the rates of postresection seizure freedom at 1-year clinical follow-up (60.2% SDE vs 75.0% sEEG, p = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings reveal a difference in rates of surgical complications and resection between SDEs and sEEG. Larger prospective, multi-institutional pediatric comparative effectiveness studies may further explore these associations.

Seizure Outcomes and Reoperation in Surgical Rasmussen Encephalitis Patients

BACKGROUND

Rasmussen encephalitis (RE) is a rare inflammatory disease affecting one hemisphere, causing progressive neurological deficits and intractable seizures.

OBJECTIVE

To report long-term seizure outcomes, reoperations, and functional outcomes in patients with RE who underwent hemispherectomy at our institution.

METHODS

Retrospective review was performed for all patients with RE who had surgery between 1998 and 2020. We collected seizure history, postoperative outcomes, and functional data. Imaging was independently reviewed in a blinded fashion by 2 neurosurgeons and a neuroradiologist.

RESULTS

We analyzed 30 patients with RE who underwent 35 hemispherectomies (5 reoperations). Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, seizure-freedom rate was 81.5%, 63.6%, and 55.6% at 1, 5, and 10 years after surgery, respectively. Patients with shorter duration of hemiparesis preoperatively were less likely to be seizure-free at follow-up (P = .011) and more likely to undergo reoperation (P = .004). Shorter duration of epilepsy (P = .026) and preoperative bilateral MRI abnormalities (P = .011) were associated with increased risk of reoperation. Complete disconnection of diseased hemisphere on postoperative MRI after the first operation improved seizure-freedom (P = .021) and resulted in fewer reoperations (P = .034), and reoperation resulted in seizure freedom in every case.

CONCLUSION

Obtaining complete disconnection is critical for favorable seizure outcomes from hemispherectomy, and neurosurgeons should have a low threshold to reoperate in patients with RE with recurrent seizures. Rapid progression of motor deficits and bilateral MRI abnormalities may indicate a subpopulation of patients with RE with increased risk of needing reoperation. Overall, we believe that hemispherectomy is a curative surgery for the majority of patients with RE, with excellent long-term seizure outcome.

Intracranial pressure monitoring during stereoelectroencephalography implantation: a technical note

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has become increasingly employed as a critical component of epilepsy workups for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy when information from noninvasive studies is not conclusive and sufficient to guide epilepsy surgery. Although exceedingly rare, clinically significant hemorrhagic complications can be caused during SEEG implantation procedures. Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) can be difficult to recognize due to the minimally invasive nature of SEEG. The authors describe their technique using a commercially available intraparenchymal intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor as a method for early intraoperative detection of ICH during SEEG implantation. Between May 2019 and July 2021, 18 pediatric patients underwent SEEG implantation at a single, freestanding children's hospital with the use of an ICP monitor during the procedure. No patients experienced complications resulting from this technique. The authors have relayed their rationale for ICP monitor use during SEEG, the technical considerations, and the safety profile. In addition, they have reported an illustrative case in which the ICP monitor proved crucial in early detection of ICH during SEEG implantation.

Safety and Efficacy of Stereoelectroencephalography in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is the preoperative assessment of choice when the epileptogenic zone (EZ) is unclear in patients requiring surgery for severe, drug-refractory epilepsy. There are relatively little data on the safety and efficacy of SEEG in the pediatric epilepsy population. We, therefore, investigated the insertional complications, rate of successful identification of the EZ, and long-term seizure outcomes following surgery after SEEG in children. This was a retrospective study of drug-resistant pediatric epilepsy patients treated with surgery between 2005 and 2020 and who underwent presurgical SEEG. Rationale for and coverage of SEEG, identification of the EZ, and ultimate seizure outcome following SEEG-tailored resections were collected and analyzed. Thirty patients (15 male, mean age: 12.4 ± 5 years) who underwent SEEG were studied. SEEG-related complications occurred in one case (3%). A total of 190 multicontact electrodes (mean: 7.0 ± 2.5 per patient) were implanted across 30 insertions capturing 440 electrographic seizures (mean: 17.5 ± 27.6 per patient). The most common rationale for SEEG was normal magnetic resonance imaging with surface EEG that failed to identify the EZ (17/30; 57%). SEEG identified a putative EZ in all cases, resulting in SEEG-tailored resections in 25/30 (83%). Freedom from disabling seizures was achieved following resections in 20/25 cases (80%) with 5.9 ± 4.0 years of postoperative follow-up. SEEG is a safe and effective way to identify the EZ in the presurgical evaluation of children with refractory epilepsy and permits effective and long-lasting SEEG-tailored resections.

Robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography in young children: technical challenges and considerations

Robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) is frequently employed to localize epileptogenic zones in patients with medically refractory epilepsy (MRE). Its methodology is well described in adults, but less so in children. Given the limited information available on pediatric applications, the objective is to describe the unique technical challenges and considerations of sEEG in the pediatric population. In this report, we describe our institutional experience with the technical aspects of robot-assisted sEEG in an exclusively pediatric epilepsy surgery unit, focusing on pre-, intra-, and post-operative nuances that are particular to the pediatric population. The pediatric population presents several unique challenges in sEEG, including reduced skull thickness relative to adults, incomplete neurologic development, and often special behavioral considerations. Pre-operative selection of putative epileptogenic zones requires careful multidisciplinary decision-making. Intraoperative attention to nuances in positioning, clamp selection, registration, and electrode placement are necessary. Activity considerations and electrode migration and removal are key post-operative considerations. Robot-assisted sEEG is a valuable tool in the armamentarium of techniques to characterize MRE. However, special considerations must be given to the pediatric population to optimize safety and efficacy.

The role of stereo-electroencephalography to localize the epileptogenic zone in children with nonlesional brain magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the clinical outcome and outcome predictive factors in pediatric epilepsy patients evaluated with stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG).

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients who underwent SEEG implantation at the Pediatric Epilepsy Center in New York Presbyterian Hospital between June 2014 and December 2019 were enrolled for retrospective chart review. Postoperative seizure outcomes were evaluated in patients with at least 12-months follow up. Meta-analysis was conducted via electronic literature search of data reported from 2000 to 2020 to evaluate significant surgical outcome predictors for SEEG evaluation in the pediatric population.

RESULTS

In the current case series of 25 postsurgical patients with long-term follow up, 16 patients (64.0%) were seizure free. An additional 7 patients (28.0%) showed significant seizure improvement and 2 patients (8.0%) showed no change in seizure activity. Patients with nonlesional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) achieved seizure freedom in 50% (5/10) of cases. By comparison, 73% (11/15) of patients with lesional MRI achieved seizure freedom. Out of 12 studies, 158 pediatric patients were identified for inclusion in a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of SEEG. Seizure freedom was reported 54.4% (n = 86/158) of patients at last follow up. Among patients with nonlesional MRI, 45% (n = 24) achieved seizure freedom compared with patients with lesional MRI findings (61.2%, n:= 60) (p = 0.02). The risk for seizure recurrence was 2.15 times higher [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-4.37, p = 0.033] in patients diagnosed with nonlesional focal epilepsy compared to those with lesional epilepsy [ 1.49 (95% CI 1.06-2.114, p = 0.021].

CONCLUSION

Evaluation by SEEG implantation in pediatric epilepsy is effective in localizing the epileptogenic zone with favorable outcome. Presence of a non-lesional brain MRI was associated with lower chances of seizure freedom. Further research is warranted to improve the efficacy of SEEG in localizing the epileptogenic zone in pediatric patients with non-lesional brain MRI.

Stereoelectroencephalography in the very young: Case report

•

To the best of our knowledge this is the youngest reported patient implanted with SEEG.

•

Accurate and safe SEEG surgery may be feasible in patients as young as 17 months-old.

•

Robotic SEEG with standard tools may be effectively used in this very young population.

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an increasingly popular invasive monitoring approach to epilepsy surgery in patients with drug-resistant epilepsies. The technique allows a three-dimensional definition of the epileptogenic zones (EZ) in the brain. It has been shown to be safe and effective in adults and older children but has been used sparingly in children less than two years old due to concerns about pin fixation in thin bone, registration accuracy, and bolt security. As such, most current series of pediatric invasive EEG explorations do not include young participants, and, when they do, SEEG is often not utilized for these patients. Recent national survey data further suggests SEEG is infrequently utilized in very young patients. We present a novel case of SEEG used to localize the EZ in a 17-month-old patient with thin cranial bone, an open fontanelle, and severe drug-resistant epilepsy due to tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), with excellent accuracy, surgical results, and seizure remission.

Surgically treatable adult epilepsy: a changing patient population. Experience from a level 4 epilepsy center

OBJECTIVE

Invasive monitoring has long been utilized in the evaluation of patients for epilepsy surgery, providing localizing information to guide resection. Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) was introduced at the authors' level 4 epilepsy surgery program in 2013, with responsive neurostimulation (RNS) becoming available the following year. The authors sought to characterize patient demographics and epilepsy-related variables before and after SEEG introduction to understand whether differences emerged in their patient population. This information will be useful in understanding how SEEG, possibly in conjunction with RNS availability, may have changed practice patterns over time.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent surgery for epilepsy from 2006 to 2018, comprising 7 years before and 5 years after the introduction of SEEG. The authors performed univariate analyses of patient characteristics and outcomes and used generalized estimating equations logistic regression for predictive analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 178 patients were analyzed, with 109 patients in the pre-SEEG cohort and 69 patients in the post-SEEG cohort. In the post-SEEG cohort, more patients underwent invasive monitoring for suspected bilateral seizure onsets (40.6% vs 22.0%, p = 0.01) and extratemporal seizure onsets (68.1% vs 8.3%, p < 0.0001). The post-SEEG cohort had a higher proportion of patients with seizures arising from eloquent cortex (14.5% vs 0.9%, p < 0.001). Twelve patients underwent RNS insertion in the post-SEEG group versus none in the pre-SEEG group. Fewer patients underwent resection in the post-SEEG group (55.1% vs 96.3%, p < 0.0001), but there was no significant difference in rates of seizure freedom between cohorts for those patients having undergone a follow-up resection (53.1% vs 59.8%, p = 0.44).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that more patients with suspected bilateral, eloquent, or extratemporal epilepsy underwent invasive monitoring after adoption of SEEG. This shift occurred coincident with the adoption of RNS, both of which likely contributed to increased patient complexity. The authors conclude that their practice now considers invasive monitoring for patients who likely would not previously have been candidates for surgical investigation and subsequent intervention.

Early implementation of stereoelectroencephalography in children: a multiinstitutional case series

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has been increasingly performed in the United States, with published literature being limited primarily to large single-center case series. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the experience of pediatric epilepsy centers, where the technique has been adopted in the last several years, via a multicenter case series studying patient demographics, outcomes, and complications.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort methodology was used based on the STROBE criteria. ANOVA was used to evaluate for significant differences between the means of continuous variables among centers. Dichotomous outcomes were assessed between centers using a univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 170 SEEG insertion procedures were included in the study from 6 different level 4 pediatric epilepsy centers. The mean patient age at time of SEEG insertion was 12.3 ± 4.7 years. There was no significant difference between the mean age at the time of SEEG insertion between centers (p = 0.3). The mean number of SEEG trajectories per patient was 11.3 ± 3.6, with significant variation between centers (p < 0.001). Epileptogenic loci were identified in 84.7% of cases (144/170). Patients in 140 cases (140/170, 82.4%) underwent a follow-up surgical intervention, with 47.1% (66/140) being seizure free at a mean follow-up of 30.6 months. An overall postoperative hemorrhage rate of 5.3% (9/170) was noted, with patients in 4 of these cases (4/170, 2.4%) experiencing a symptomatic hemorrhage and patients in 3 of these cases (3/170, 1.8%) requiring operative evacuation of the hemorrhage. There were no mortalities or long-term complications.

CONCLUSIONS

As the first multicenter case series in pediatric SEEG, this study has aided in establishing normative practice patterns in the application of a novel surgical technique, provided a framework for anticipated outcomes that is generalizable and useful for patient selection, and allowed for discussion of what is an acceptable complication rate relative to the experiences of multiple institutions.

Pediatric stereo-electroencephalography: effects of robot assistance and other variables on seizure outcome and complications

OBJECTIVE

The safety of stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) has been investigated; however, most studies have not differentiated pediatric and adult populations, which have different anatomy and physiology. The purpose of this study was to assess SEEG safety in the pediatric setting, focusing on surgical complications and the identification of patient and surgical risk factors, if any. The authors also aimed to determine whether robot assistance in SEEG was associated with a change in practice, surgical parameters, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively studied all SEEG cases performed in their department from December 2014 to March 2020. They analyzed both demographic and surgical variables and noted the types of surgery-related complications and their management. They also studied the clinical outcomes of a subset of the patients in relation to robot-assisted and non-robot-assisted SEEG.

RESULTS

Sixty-three children had undergone 64 SEEG procedures. Girls were on average 3 years younger than the boys (mean age 11.1 vs 14.1 years, p < 0.01). The overall complication rate was 6.3%, and the complication rate for patients with left-sided electrodes was higher than that for patients with right-sided electrodes (11.1% vs 3.3%), although the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The duration of recording was positively correlated to the number of implanted electrodes (r = 0.296, p < 0.05). Robot assistance was associated with a higher number of implanted electrodes (mean 12.6 vs 7.6 electrodes, p < 0.0001). Robot-assisted implantations were more accurate, with a mean error of 1.51 mm at the target compared to 2.98 mm in nonrobot implantations (p < 0.001). Clinical outcomes were assessed in the first 32 patients treated (16 in the nonrobot group and 16 in the robot group), 23 of whom proceeded to further resective surgery. The children who had undergone robot-assisted SEEG had better eventual seizure control following subsequent epilepsy surgery. Of the children who had undergone resective epilepsy surgery, 42% (5/12) in the nonrobot group and 82% (9/11) in the robot group obtained an Engel class IA outcome at 1 year (χ2 = 3.885, p = 0.049). Based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the robot group had a higher seizure-free rate than the nonrobot group at 30 months postoperation (7/11 vs 2/12, p = 0.063). Two complications, whose causes were attributed to the implantation and head-bandaging steps, required surgical intervention. All complications were either transient or reversible.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest single-center, exclusively pediatric SEEG series that includes robot assistance so far. SEEG complications are uncommon and usually transient or treatable. Robot assistance enabled implantation of more electrodes and improved epilepsy surgery outcomes, as compared to those in the non-robot-assisted cases.

Neurosurgical robot-assistant stereoelectroencephalography system: Operability and accuracy

BACKGROUND

Fine operation has been an eternal topic in neurosurgery. There were many problems in functional neurosurgery field with high precision requirements. Our study aims to explore the operability, accuracy and postoperative effect of robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) in neurosurgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with epilepsy who underwent electrode implantation in our hospital. From 2016 to 2019, the epilepsy center of Hebei people's hospital implanted electrodes in neurosurgery on 24 patients, including 20 with SINO robot-assisted SEEG system and eight with frame-SEEG technology.

RESULT

Robot-assisted SEEG neurosurgery had higher accuracy, and the mean error of entry and target point was smaller than that of frame SEEG surgery. No bleeding or infection occurred postoperatively, and two patients who underwent robot-assisted SEEG neurosurgery had electrode displacement. Electrode displacement was observed in two patients, both the entry points were orbital frontal, one in the frame system and one in the robot assistant system. The average placement time of each electrode in robot assisted system surgery was less than that in frame system surgery.

CONCLUSION

The SINO SEEG electrode implantation assisted by surgical robot-assistant system manufactured in China is safe, accurate and mature.

Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) in pediatric epilepsy: Utility in children with and without prior epilepsy surgery failure

BACKGROUND

When noninvasive modalities fail to adequately localize the seizure onset zone (SOZ) in children with medically refractory epilepsy, invasive interrogation with stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) or subdural electrodes may be required. Our center utilizes SEEG for invasive monitoring in a carefully selected population of children, many of whom have seizures despite a prior surgical resection. We describe the cohort of patients who underwent SEEG in the first 5 years of its employment in our institution, almost half of which had a history of a failed epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of the first 44 consecutive children who underwent SEEG at Nicklaus Children's Hospital (Miami, Florida), a large, level 4 epilepsy referral center. Patient demographic, clinical, radiographic, and electrophysiological information was collected prospectively. Student's t-test was used for sampling of means and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for evaluation of variance beyond 2 means; chi-square test of independence was used to assess the relationship between categorical variables.

RESULTS

There were 44 patients in this cohort, of whom 17 (38.6 %) were male. The mean age of seizure onset was 6.2 years. Twenty-one patients (47.7 %) had previously failed an epilepsy surgery. Patients with a history of prior epilepsy surgery failure were older at SEEG implantation (17.6 vs. 13.7 years; p = 0.043), were more likely to have SEEG for identification of resection margins (9 vs. 4; p = 0.034), and had fewer electrodes placed (5.9 vs. 7.5; p = 0.016). No difference was seen in complication rates between groups with only 3/297 electrodes placed associated with complications, all of which were minor. Post-SEEG, 29 (65.9 %) patients underwent focal resection, 7 patients had VNS insertion, 3 underwent RNS placement, and 5 had no further intervention. The majority of patients that underwent resection in both groups experienced an improvement in seizures (Engel class I-III), reported by 13/15 (86.7 %) in those naive to surgery and 10/14 (71.4 %) in those with prior surgical failure. Seizure-freedom was much lower in those with prior epilepsy surgery, seen in only 4/14 (28.6 %) versus 8/15 (53.3 %).

CONCLUSION

Our data supports current literature on SEEG as a safe and effective method of electrophysiological evaluation in children naive to surgery and adds that it is a safe technique in children with a history of failed epilepsy surgery. There was no difference in complication rates, which were <1 % in both groups. A favorable outcome was seen in the majority of patients in both groups; the seizure freedom rate, however, was much lower in those with prior epilepsy surgery.

Comparison of subdural grid and stereoelectroencephalography in a cohort of pediatric patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare adverse events and outcomes between stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and subdural electrode (SDE) implantation in children.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 108 patients who underwent intracranial monitoring with SEEG or SDE implantation at Children's Hospital Colorado between January 2011 and June 2019.

RESULTS

There were 47 patients who underwent 53 SEEG implantations and 61 patients who underwent 64 SDE implantations, with an average age of 12.45 years (range: 1.22-19.96 years). Post-implantation imaging was performed in all SEEG implantations and 42 SDE implantations. 38 % and 88 % of SEEG and SDE implantations, respectively, had a hemorrhage of any kind (p < 0.01). Clinically significant hemorrhages did not differ between the two groups, though one death was reported in the SEEG group. No patient undergoing SEEG implantation received blood products compared to 20 % of SDE patients (p < 0.01). The rate of infection in SEEG patients was 4% compared to 33 % for SDE patients (p = 0.01). Resection was completed in 60 % of SEEG patients versus 93 % for SDE patients (p < 0.01). Rate of seizure response was not significantly different between the two groups, with 81 % and 71 % of SEEG and SDE patients, respectively, reaching Engel class I or II at 12 months (p = 0.76).

SIGNIFICANCE

In pediatric patients at a single institution, SEEG is associated with less adverse effects overall yet similar rates of seizure freedom compared to SDE implantation. This includes significantly lower rates of asymptomatic hemorrhage, infection and need for blood transfusion associated with SEEG monitoring. There was no statistical difference in clinically significant hemorrhages between the two groups, although rare in both.

Epilepsy Surgery in Children

Epilepsy in children continues to present a major medical and economic burden on society. Left untreated, seizures can present the risk of sudden death and severe cognitive impairment. It is understood that primary care providers having concerns about abnormal movements or behaviors in children will make a prompt referral to a trusted pediatric neurologist. The authors present a brief introduction to seizure types, classification, and management with particular focus on what surgery for epilepsy can offer. Improved seizure control and its attendant improvements in quality of life can be achieved with timely referral and intervention.

Variation in pediatric stereoelectroencephalography practice among pediatric neurosurgeons in the United States: survey results

OBJECTIVE

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has become widespread in the United States during the past decade. Many pediatric neurosurgeons practicing SEEG may not have had experience with this technique during their formal training, and the literature is mostly limited to single-center series. As a result, implementation of this relatively new technique may vary at different institutions. The authors hypothesized that aspects of SEEG experience, techniques, and outcomes would vary widely among programs across the country.

METHODS

An electronic survey with 35 questions addressing the categories of training and experience, technique, electrode locations, and outcomes was sent to 128 pediatric epilepsy surgeons who were potential SEEG users.

RESULTS

Sixty-one pediatric fellowship-trained epilepsy surgeons in the United States responded to the survey. Eighty-nine percent were actively using SEEG in their practice. Seventy-two percent of SEEG programs were in existence for less than 5 years, and 68% were using SEEG for > 70% of their invasive monitoring. Surgeons at higher-volume centers operated on younger patients (p < 0.001). Most surgeons (70%) spent 1-3 hours per case planning electrode trajectories. Two-thirds of respondents reported a median implant duration of 5-7 days, but 16% reported never having an implant duration > 5 days, and 16% reported having had implants stay in place for > 4 weeks. The median response for the median number of electrodes initially implanted was 12 electrodes, although 19% of respondents reported median implants of 5-8 electrodes and 17% reported median implants of 15-18 electrodes. Having a higher volume of SEEG cases per year was associated with a higher median number of electrodes implanted (p < 0.001). Most surgeons found SEEG helpful in defining an epileptic network and reported that most of their SEEG patients undergo focal surgical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

SEEG has been embraced by the pediatric epilepsy surgery community. Higher case volume is correlated with a tendency to place more electrodes and operate on younger patients. For most parameters addressed in the survey, responses from surgeons clustered around a norm, though additional findings of substantial variations highlight differences in implementation and philosophy among pediatric epilepsy programs.

Surgical candidates in children with epileptic spasms can be selected without invasive monitoring: A report of 70 cases

OBJECTIVE

Prior surgical series in children with drug-resistant epileptic spasms have reported use of intracranial EEG monitoring in up to two-third of patients. We report outcome after epilepsy surgery for drug-resistant epileptic spasms in a cohort of children without the use of intracranial EEG monitoring in any of the patients.

METHODS

Medical records of all consecutive children aged 5 years or under who had epilepsy surgery for epileptic spasms at Cleveland Clinic between 2000 and 2018 were reviewed. Post-operative seizure outcome and predictors of prognosis of seizure outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy children with active epileptic spasms underwent surgical resections during the study period. Mean age at seizure onset was 6.8 (+9.31) months and median age at surgery was 18.5 months. An epileptogenic lesion was identified on brain MRI in all patients; 17 (24%) had bilateral abnormalities. Etiologies included malformations of cortical development (58%), perinatal infarct/encephalomalacia (39%), and tumor (3%). None of the patients had intracranial EEG. Surgical procedures included hemispherectomy (44%), lobectomy/ lesionectomy (33%), and multilobar resections (23%). Twelve children needed repeat surgery; six (50%) became seizure free after the second surgery. At six months follow-up, 73% (51/70) were seizure-free since surgery. At a mean follow-up of 4.7 years, 60% (42/70) had Engel 1 outcome. In those with seizure recurrence, 17 (60%) reported improvement. Shorter epilepsy duration (p = 0.05) and lobar or sub-lobar epileptogenic lesions (p = 0.02) predicted favorable seizure outcome at 6 months after surgery. For long term outcome, patients with bilateral abnormalities on MRI (p = 0.001), and multilobar extent on MRI (p = 0.02) were at higher risk for recurrence.

SIGNIFICANCE

Children with drug-resistant epileptic spasms secondary to an epileptogenic lesion detected on MRI could be selected for epilepsy surgery without undergoing intracranial EEG monitoring. A surgical selection paradigm without intracranial monitoring may allow early surgery without the risks of invasive monitoring.

Stereotactic Electroencephalography Implantation Through Nonautologous Cranioplasty: Proof of Concept

BACKGROUND

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an effective method to define the epileptogenic zone (EZ) in patients with medically intractable epilepsy. Typical placement requires passing and anchoring electrodes through native skull.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the successful placement of SEEG electrodes in patients without native bone. To the best of our knowledge, the use of SEEG in patients with nonautologous cranioplasties has not been described.

METHODS

We describe 3 cases in which SEEG was performed through nonautologous cranioplasty. The first is a 30-yr-old male with a titanium mesh cranioplasty following a left pterional craniotomy for aneurysm clipping. The second is a 51-yr-old female who previously underwent lesionectomy of a ganglioglioma with mesh cranioplasty and subsequent recurrence of her seizures. The third is a 31-yr-old male with a polyether ether ketone cranioplasty following decompressive hemicraniectomy for trauma.

RESULTS

SEEG was performed successfully in all three cases without intraoperative difficulties or complications and with excellent electroencephalogram recording and optimal localization of the seizure focus. The EZ was successfully localized in all three patients. There were no limitations related to drilling or inserting the guiding bolt/electrode through the nonautologous cranioplasties.

CONCLUSION

SEEG through nonautologous cranioplasties was clinically feasible, safe, and effective in our series. The presence of nonautologous bone cranioplasty should not preclude such patients from undergoing SEEG explorations.

Robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography electrode placement in twenty-three pediatric patients: a high-resolution analysis of individual lead placement time and accuracy at a single institution

PURPOSE

We describe a detailed evaluation of predictors associated with individual lead placement efficiency and accuracy for 261 stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) electrodes placed for epilepsy monitoring in twenty-three children at our institution.

METHODS

Intra- and post-operative data was used to generate a linear mixed model to investigate predictors associated with three outcomes (lead placement time, lead entry error, lead target error) while accounting for correlated observations from the same patients. Lead placement time was measured using electronic time-stamp records stored by the ROSA software for each individual electrode; entry and target site accuracy was measured using postoperative stereotactic CT images fused with preoperative electrode trajectory planning images on the ROSA computer software. Predictors were selected from a list of variables that included patient demographics, laterality of leads, anatomic location of lead, skull thickness, bolt cap device used, and lead sequence number.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (11 female, 48%) of mean age 11.7 (± 6.1) years underwent placement of intracranial sEEG electrodes (median 11 electrodes) at our institution over a period of 1 year. There were no associated infections, hemorrhages, or other adverse events, and successful seizure capture was obtained in all monitored patients. The mean placement time for individual electrodes across all patients was 6.56 (± 3.5) min; mean target accuracy was 4.5 (± 3.5) mm. Lesional electrodes were associated with 25.7% (95% CI: 6.7-40.9%, p = 0.02) smaller target point errors. Larger skull thickness was associated with larger error: for every 1-mm increase in skull thickness, there was a 4.3% (95% CI: 1.2-7.5%, p = 0.007) increase in target error. Bilateral lead placement was associated with 26.0% (95% CI: 9.9-44.5%, p = 0.002) longer lead placement time. The relationship between placement time and lead sequence number was nonlinear: it decreased consistently for the first 4 electrodes, and became less pronounced thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

Variation in sEEG electrode placement efficiency and accuracy can be explained by phenomena both within and outside of operator control. It is important to keep in mind the factors that can lead to better or worse lead placement efficiency and/or accuracy in order to maximize patient safety while maintaining the standard of care.

The UK experience of stereoelectroencephalography in children: An analysis of factors predicting the identification of a seizure-onset zone and subsequent seizure freedom

OBJECTIVE

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is being used more frequently in the pre-surgical evaluation of children with focal epilepsy. It has been shown to be safe in children, but there are no multicenter studies assessing the rates and factors associated with the identification of a putative seizure-onset zone (SOZ) and subsequent seizure freedom following SEEG-guided epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective cohort study of all children undergoing SEEG at six of seven UK Children's Epilepsy Surgery Service centers from 2014 to 2019. Demographics, noninvasive evaluation, SEEG, and operative factors were analyzed to identify variables associated with the identification of a putative SOZ and subsequent seizure freedom following SEEG-guided epilepsy surgery.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-five patients underwent 139 SEEG explorations using a total of 1767 electrodes. A putative SOZ was identified in 117 patients (85.7%); odds of successfully finding an SOZ were 6.4 times greater for non-motor seizures compared to motor seizures (p = 0.02) and 3.6 times more if four or more seizures were recorded during SEEG (p = 0.03). Of 100 patients undergoing surgical treatment, 47 (47.0%) had an Engel class I outcome at a median follow-up of 1.3 years; the only factor associated with outcome was indication for SEEG (p = 0.03); an indication of "recurrence following surgery/treatment" had a 5.9 times lower odds of achieving seizure freedom (p = 0.002) compared to the "lesion negative" cohort, whereas other indications ("lesion positive, define extent," "lesion positive, discordant noninvasive investigations" and "multiple lesions") were not statistically significantly different.

SIGNIFICANCE

This large nationally representative cohort illustrates that SEEG-guided surgery can still achieve high rates of seizure freedom. Seizure semiology and the number of seizures recorded during SEEG are important factors in the identification of a putative SOZ, and the indication for SEEG is an important factor in postoperative outcomes.

Stereotactic depth electrode placement surgery in paediatric and adult patients with the Neuromate robotic device: Accuracy, complications and epileptological results

OBJECTIVE

The number of patients requiring depth electrode implantation for invasive video EEG diagnostics increases in most epilepsy centres. Here we report on our institutional experience with frameless robot-assisted stereotactic placement of intracerebral depth electrodes using the Neuromate® stereotactic robot-system.

METHODS

We identified all patients who had undergone robot-assisted stereotactic placement of intracerebral depth electrodes for invasive extra-operative epilepsy monitoring between September 2013 and March 2020. We studied technical (placement) and diagnostic accuracy of the robot-assisted procedure, associated surgical complications and procedural time requirements.

RESULTS

We evaluated a total of 464 depth electrodes implanted in 74 patients (mean 6 per patient, range 1-12). There were 27 children and 47 adults (age range: 3.6-64.6 yrs.). The mean entry and target point errors were 1.82±1.15 and 1.98±1.05 mm. Target and entry point errors were significantly higher in paediatric vs. adult patients and for electrodes targeting the temporo-mesial region. There were no clinically relevant haemorrhages and no infectious complications. Mean time for the placement of one electrode was 37±14 min and surgery time per electrode decreased with the number of electrodes placed. 55 patients (74.3%) underwent definitive surgical treatment. 36/51 (70.1%) patients followed for >12 months or until seizure recurrence became seizure-free (ILAE I).

CONCLUSION

Frameless robot-guided stereotactic placement of depth electrodes with the Neuromate® stereotactic robot-system is safe and feasible even in very young children, with good in vivo accuracy and high diagnostic precision. The surgical workflow is time-efficient and further improves with increasing numbers of implanted electrodes.

Safety of responsive neurostimulation in pediatric patients with medically refractory epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Approximately 75% of pediatric patients who suffer from epilepsy are successfully treated with antiepileptic drugs, while the disease is drug resistant in the remaining patients, who continue to have seizures. Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) may have options to undergo invasive treatment such as resection, laser ablation of the epileptogenic focus, or vagus nerve stimulation. To date, treatment with responsive neurostimulation (RNS) has not been sufficiently studied in the pediatric population because the FDA has not approved the RNS device for patients younger than 18 years of age. Here, the authors sought to investigate the safety of RNS in pediatric patients.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective single-center study of consecutive patients with DRE who had undergone RNS system implantation from September 2015 to December 2019. Patients were followed up postoperatively to evaluate seizure freedom and complications.

RESULTS

Of the 27 patients studied, 3 developed infections and were treated with antibiotics. Of these 3 patients, one required partial removal and salvaging of a functioning system, and one required complete removal of the RNS device. No other complications, such as intracranial hemorrhage, stroke, or device malfunction, were seen. The average follow-up period was 22 months. All patients showed improvement in seizure frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors demonstrated the safety and efficacy of RNS in pediatric patients, with infections being the main complication.

ABBREVIATIONS

DBS = deep brain stimulation; DRE = drug-resistant epilepsy; MDC = multidisciplinary conference; MER = microelectrode recording; MSHS = Mount Sinai Health System; RNS = responsive neurostimulation; SEEG = stereo-EEG; VNS = vagus nerve stimulation.

Individualized stereoelectroencephalography evaluation and navigated resection in medically refractory pediatric epilepsy

Pediatric patients frequently require invasive exploration with intracranial electrodes to achieve high-resolution delineation of the epileptogenic zones (EZ). We intend to discuss the efficacy and safety of stereoelectroencephalophraphy (SEEG) monitoring in pediatric patients with difficulty to localize the EZ. We retrospectively analyzed presurgical findings, SEEG data, resections, and outcomes of a series of 72 consecutive pediatric patients (<18 yrs) who had medically refractory epilepsy and received SEEG recording between January 2015 and September 2019. There were 20 girls and 52 boys with a mean age of 10.13 ± 4.11 years old (range: 1.8-18 years). Twenty-seven patients (37.5%) had nonlesional magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs). In total, 744 electrodes were implanted for an average of 10.33 ± 2.53 (range: 3-18) electrodes per patient. Twenty-eight explorations were unilateral (17 left and 11 right), and 44 explorations were bilateral (12 of which was predominately one side). The average monitoring period in days for the SEEG was 8.99 ± 5.79 (range: 3-25) days. The EZ could be located in 67 (94.4%) patients for the initial implantation according to SEEG monitoring. Lobectomy was performed in 12 patients (17.9%), of those anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) was performed in 8 cases (11.9%) and insular plus was 2 cases (3.0%), multilobectomy resections in 15 cases (22.4%), tailored cortical resections in 37 cases (55.2%), and corpus callosotomy plus in 2 cases (3.0%). The average follow-up was 18.1 ± 7.53 months (range: 6-54). Forty-three of 67 patients (64.2%) were Engel class I, 12 patients (17.9%) were Engel class II, 10 patients (14.9%) were Engel class III, and an additional 2 patients (3.0%) were Engel class IV. In the SEEG implantation series, no child experienced serious or permanent morbidity. One patient (1.4%) experienced symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and 3 patients (4.2%) experienced asymptomatic ICH. There were no postimplantation infections or other postoperative complications associated with the SEEG. Several common complications related to resection surgery were included in this series with zero mortality. Of the 6 patients in whom we performed a second surgery, 4 of them subsequently became seizure-free (66.7%) after undergoing the second resection with SEEG evaluation. Stereoelectroencephalophraphy is a safe and efficient methodology to identify the EZ in particularly complex cases of focal medically refractory epilepsy for pediatric patients, even in infancy and early childhood. Seizure outcomes of SEEG-guided resection surgery are desirable. We recommend SEEG evaluations and even a more aggressive resection in certain pediatric patients who failed initial resection with realistic chances to benefit from reoperation.

Planning stereoelectroencephalography using automated lesion detection: Retrospective feasibility study

Objective

This retrospective, cross‐sectional study evaluated the feasibility and potential benefits of incorporating deep‐learning on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into planning stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) implantation in pediatric patients with diagnostically complex drug‐resistant epilepsy. This study aimed to assess the degree of colocalization between automated lesion detection and the seizure onset zone (SOZ) as assessed by sEEG.

Methods

A neural network classifier was applied to cortical features from MRI data from three cohorts. (1) The network was trained and cross‐validated using 34 patients with visible focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs). (2) Specificity was assessed in 20 pediatric healthy controls. (3) Feasibility of incorporation into sEEG implantation plans was evaluated in 34 sEEG patients. Coordinates of sEEG contacts were coregistered with classifier‐predicted lesions. sEEG contacts in seizure onset and irritative tissue were identified by clinical neurophysiologists. A distance of <10 mm between SOZ contacts and classifier‐predicted lesions was considered colocalization.

Results

In patients with radiologically defined lesions, classifier sensitivity was 74% (25/34 lesions detected). No clusters were detected in the controls (specificity = 100%). Of the total 34 sEEG patients, 21 patients had a focal cortical SOZ, of whom eight were histopathologically confirmed as having an FCD. The algorithm correctly detected seven of eight of these FCDs (86%). In patients with histopathologically heterogeneous focal cortical lesions, there was colocalization between classifier output and SOZ contacts in 62%. In three patients, the electroclinical profile was indicative of focal epilepsy, but no SOZ was localized on sEEG. In these patients, the classifier identified additional abnormalities that had not been implanted.

Significance

There was a high degree of colocalization between automated lesion detection and sEEG. We have created a framework for incorporation of deep‐learning–based MRI lesion detection into sEEG implantation planning. Our findings support the prospective evaluation of automated MRI analysis to plan optimal electrode trajectories.

Robotic Surgical Assistant Rehearsal: Combining 3-Dimensional-Printing Technology With Preoperative Stereotactic Planning for Placement of Stereoencephalography Electrodes

BACKGROUND

The use of frameless stereotactic robotic technology has rapidly expanded since the Food and Drug Administration's approval of the Robotic Surgical Assistant (ROSA) in 2012. Although the use of the ROSA robot has greatly augmented stereotactic placement of intracerebral stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) for the purposes of epileptogenic focus identification, the preoperative planning stages remain limited to computer software.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of a 3-dimensionally (3D)-printed patient model in the preoperative planning of ROSA-assisted depth electrode placement for epilepsy monitoring in a pediatric patient.

METHODS

An anatomically accurate 3D model was created and registered in a preoperative rehearsal session using the ROSA platform. After standard software-based electrode trajectory planning, sEEG electrodes were sequentially placed in the 3D model.

RESULTS

Utilization of the 3D-printed model enabled workflow optimization and increased staff familiarity with the logistics of the robotic technology as it relates to depth electrode placement. The rehearsal maneuvers enabled optimization of patient head positioning as well as identification of physical conflicts between 2 electrodes. This permitted revision of trajectory planning in anticipation of the actual case, thereby improving patient safety and decreasing operative time.

CONCLUSION

Use of a 3D-printed patient model enhanced presurgical positioning and trajectory planning in the placement of stereotactic sEEG electrodes for epilepsy monitoring in a pediatric patient. The ROSA rehearsal decreased operative time and increased efficiency of electrode placement.

Stereoelectroencephalography in epilepsy, cognitive neurophysiology, and psychiatric disease: safety, efficacy, and place in therapy

For patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, surgical intervention may be an effective treatment option if the epileptogenic zone (EZ) can be well localized. Subdural strip and grid electrode (SDE) implantations have long been used as the mainstay of intracranial seizure localization in the United States. Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an alternative approach in which depth electrodes are placed through percutaneous drill holes to stereotactically defined coordinates in the brain. Long used in certain centers in Europe, SEEG is gaining wider popularity in North America, bolstered by the advent of stereotactic robotic assistance and mounting evidence of safety, without the need for catheter-based angiography. Rates of clinically significant hemorrhage, infection, and other complications appear lower with SEEG than with SDE implants. SEEG also avoids unnecessary craniotomies when seizures are localized to unresectable eloquent cortex, found to be multifocal or nonfocal, or ultimately treated with stereotactic procedures such as laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RF-TC), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), or deep brain stimulation (DBS). While SDE allows for excellent localization and functional mapping on the cortical surface, SEEG offers a less invasive option for sampling disparate brain areas, bilateral investigations, and deep or medial targets. SEEG has shown efficacy for seizure localization in the temporal lobe, the insula, lesional and nonlesional extra-temporal epilepsy, hypothalamic hamartomas, periventricular nodular heterotopias, and patients who have had prior craniotomies for resections or grids. SEEG offers a valuable opportunity for cognitive neurophysiology research and may have an important role in the study of dysfunctional networks in psychiatric disease and understanding the effects of neuromodulation.