Gap between flexion and extension ranges of motion: a novel indicator to predict the loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Greater cervical kyphosis during flexion increases the risk of kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Kyphotic deformity following the loss of cervical lordosis can lead to unfavourable neurological recovery after cervical laminoplasty (CLP); therefore, it is essential to identify its risk factors. Recent studies have demonstrated that the dynamic parameters of the cervical spine, based on baseline flexion/extension radiographs, are highly useful to estimate the loss of cervical lordosis after CLP. However, it remains unclear whether such dynamic parameters can predict kyphotic deformity development after CLP. Hence, the present study aimed to investigate whether the dynamic parameters could predict kyphotic deformity in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) after CLP. This retrospective study included 165 patients, consisting of 10 and 155 patients with and without cervical kyphosis of C2-C7 angle ≤ -10° at the final follow-up period, respectively. Among the static and dynamic parameters of the cervical spine, greater cervical kyphosis during flexion (fC2-C7 angle) demonstrated the best discrimination between these two cohorts, with an optimal cutoff value of -27.5°. Meanwhile, greater gap range of motion (gROM = flexion ROM - extension ROM ) had the highest ability to predict a loss of ≥ 10° in C2-C7 angle after CLP, with an optimal cutoff value of 28.5°. This study suggests that in patients with CSM, fC2-C7 angle ≤ -25° on baseline radiographs is a potential risk for kyphotic deformity after CLP. In clinical practice, the patients with this criterion (fC2-C7 angle ≤ -25°) along with gROM ≥ 30° are at high risk of developing significant kyphotic deformity after CLP.

Preoperative Cervical Range of Motion in Flexion as a Risk Factor for Postoperative Cervical Sagittal Imbalance After Laminoplasty

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate factors associated with cervical sagittal imbalance (CSI) after cervical laminoplasty (LMP).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Preoperative dynamic cervical sagittal alignment is an important predictor for changes in cervical sagittal alignment and clinical outcomes after LMP. However, the impact of preoperative dynamic cervical sagittal alignment on postoperative changes in the cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) after LMP remains unclear. We hypothesized that preoperative cervical flexion and extension function are associated with the changes in cSVA and clinical outcomes and found potential risk factors for post-LMP CSI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing LMP at a single institution between January 2019 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The average follow-up period was 19 months. The parameters were collected before the surgery and at the final follow-up. We defined the changes in cSVA (△cSVA) ≤ -10 mm as the improvement group, -10 mm < △cSVA ≤ 10 mm as the stable group, and △cSVA > 10 mm as the deterioration group. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with postoperative CSI. The χ 2 test was used to compare categorical data between groups. T tests, analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon tests were used to assess the differences between radiographic and clinical parameters among groups. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to identify optimal cutoff values.

RESULTS

The study comprised 102 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The Japanese Orthopedic Association recovery rate was better in the improvement group and a significant aggravation in neck pain was observed in the deterioration group after surgery. Cervical Flex range of motion (ROM; spine range of flexion) was significantly higher in the deterioration group. The multivariate logistic regression model suggested that greater Flex ROM and starting LMP at C3 were significant risk factors for postoperative deterioration of cervical sagittal balance. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the cutoff value for preoperative Flex ROM was 34.10°.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative dynamic cervical sagittal alignment influences postoperative cervical sagittal balance after LMP. Cervical LMP should be carefully considered for patients with a preoperative high Flex ROM, as CSI is likely to occur after surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Dynamic Flexion-Extension Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Cervical Spine: An Evolutionary Tool for Diagnosis and Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Dynamic problems need dynamic solutions. High motility of the cervical spine causes a common age-related degenerative condition called cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), manifested by neurological impairments. An accurate and reliable diagnosis of CSM is crucial for determining appropriate management strategies. Traditional static magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been the gold standard for imaging CSM; however, it may not fully capture dynamic changes during neck movement. Dynamic flexion-extension (DFE) MRI is an innovative imaging technique that allows for real-time visualization of cervical spine motion. This review article aims to scrutinize the role of DFE MRI in assessing CSM, its added value to clinical implementations, and its limitations. Finally, by addressing the knowledge gaps, this survey sheds light on the road ahead to incorporate DFE MRI into a standard version of the practice.

Current Concepts of Cervical Spine Alignment, Sagittal Deformity, and Cervical Spine Surgery

There are not many reports on cervical spine alignment, and only a few analyze ideal surgical approaches and optimal amounts of correction needed for the various types of deformity. We comprehensively reviewed the present literature on cervical spinal deformities (with or without myelopathy) and their surgical management to provide a framework for surgical planning. A general assessment of the parameters actually in use and correlations between cervical and thoracolumbar spine alignment are provided. We also analyzed posterior, anterior, and combined cervical surgical approaches and indications for the associated techniques of laminoplasty, laminectomy and fusion, and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Finally, on the basis of the NDI, SF-36, VAS, and mJOA questionnaires, we fully evaluated the outcomes and measures of postoperative health-related quality of life. We found the need for additional prospective studies to further enhance our understanding of the importance of cervical alignment when assessing and treating cervical deformities with or without myelopathy. Future studies need to focus on correlations between cervical alignment parameters, disability scores, and myelopathy outcomes. Through this comprehensive literature review, we offer guidance on practical and important points of surgical technique, cervical alignment, and goals surgeons can meet to improve symptoms in all patients.

Favorable cervical extension capacity preventing loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty due to spontaneous restoration of initial lordosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Cervical laminoplasty is a common approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Postoperative loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) was associated with lower extension motion of the cervical spine before laminoplasty.

PURPOSE

To analyze the possible causes of preoperative cervical extension capacity affecting LCL after laminoplasty by evaluating the changes in cervical lordosis (CL) at different stages.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Seventy-two patients undergoing laminoplasty due to multilevel CSM.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Radiographic parameters included CL, extension CL (eCL), flexion CL (fCL), range of motion (ROM), extension ROM (eROM), flexion ROM (fROM) and LCL. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) and neck disability index (NDI) score.

METHODS

The data were recorded before surgery and at 3- and 24-month follow-up. All patients completed a cervical extension test preoperatively. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of eROM was constructed to discriminate the patients with and without postoperative kyphotic deformity.

RESULTS

According to the optimal cut-off value of eROM, the patients were divided into two groups: extension group (eROM≥9.3°) and control group (eROM<9.3°). The radiographic outcomes demonstrated no significant differences in CL, eCL, fCL and ROM between the two groups. Both eROM and fROM were significantly different in the two groups. There was a significant change in CL in the extension group at 3-month follow-up and in the control group at 24-month follow-up. The extension group exhibited significantly lower LCL compared with the control group at follow-up. No significant difference between the two groups was noted in the JOA recovery rate, while the NDI score was significantly different at 24-month follow-up. The positivity ratio of the extension test was significantly greater in the extension group than that in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

eROM in patients with favorable preoperative cervical extension capacity (eROM≥9.3°) consisted of the actual extension capacity and compensatory flexion. The cervical alignment would be spontaneously restored to its initial lordosis in the short term after laminoplasty. These patients had no substantial LCL at 24-month follow-up and would be good candidates for laminoplasty.

The Deterioration of Cervical Kyphosis During Neck Flexion after Laminoplasty Affects the Surgical Outcome of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective single-center study.

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated whether postoperative cervical alignment changes, in addition to preoperative patient backgrounds, imaging parameters, and disease severity, affect outcomes 1 year after laminoplasty.

METHODS

One hundred and three cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients who underwent laminoplasty were enrolled. Preoperative and postoperative (1-year) Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, cervical alignment, and balance on X-rays were assessed. Patients were classified into 2 groups for a univariate analysis according to the status of the recovery rate (RR) of the JOA score ≥50%. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with good surgical outcomes a.

RESULTS

The mean RR of the JOA score was 47.5% and the loss of cervical lordosis in the neutral position was 5.5°. The univariate analysis revealed slight differences in age, sex, and the duration of disease. Preoperative C2-7 angles were not significantly different. The C2-7 angle during flexion after surgery was significantly smaller in Group F. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, significant factors associated with the status of RR≥50% were a younger age (OR: .75, 95%CI: .59-.96), shorter duration of disease (OR: .94, 95%CI: .89-.99), and a lordotic C2-7 angle during neck flexion after surgery (OR: 1.47, 95%CI: 1.1-1.95).

CONCLUSION

We retrospectively assessed the surgical outcomes of laminoplasty in 103 CSM cases. In addition to an older age and longer duration of disease, postoperative deteriorations in cervical kyphosis during neck flexion had a negative impact on outcomes.

Indication of C2-C7 Cervical Laminoplasty with Muscle and Ligament Preservation in Patients with Kyphosis

OBJECTIVE

Cervical laminoplasty is generally not indicated in patients with kyphosis because of poor outcomes. Therefore, data on the effectiveness of posterior structure-preserving techniques in patients with kyphosis are limited. This study investigated how laminoplasty with muscle and ligament preservation can benefit patients with kyphosis via risk factor analyses of postoperative complications.

METHODS

Clinicoradiological outcomes of 106 consecutive patients, including patients with kyphosis, who had undergone C2-C7 laminoplasty in a muscle- and ligament-preserving fashion, were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical outcomes, including neurological recovery, were assessed, and sagittal parameters were measured on radiographs.

RESULTS

Surgical outcomes of patients with kyphosis were comparable to outcomes of other patients except for axial pain (AP), which was significantly more frequent in patients with kyphosis. Moreover, AP was significantly associated with alignment loss (AL) >0°. Substantial local kyphosis (local kyphosis angle >10°) and greater value of range of motion (ROM) during flexion minus ROM during extension were identified as risk factors for AP and AL >0°, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated ROM during flexion minus ROM during extension cutoff value of 0.7° for predicting AL >0° in patients with kyphosis (sensitivity: 77%; specificity: 84%). Substantial local kyphosis combined with ROM during flexion minus ROM during extension >0.7° had 56% sensitivity and 84% specificity for predicting AP in patients with kyphosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients with kyphosis had a significantly higher incidence of AP, C2-C7 cervical laminoplasty with muscle and ligament preservation may not be contraindicated in selected patients with kyphosis by risk stratification for AP and AL using newly identified risk factors.

Effect of preoperative dynamic cervical sagittal alignment on the loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty

PURPOSE

Cervical laminoplasty (CLP) is a developed surgical procedure for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), but only a few of those studies focus on preoperative dynamic cervical sagittal alignment and the study of different degrees of loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) is lacking. This study aimed to analyze patients who underwent CLP to investigate the effect of cervical extension and flexion function on different degrees of LCL.

METHODS

In this retrospective case-control study, we analyzed 79 patients who underwent CLP for CSM between January 2019 and December 2020. We measured the cervical sagittal alignment parameters on lateral radiographs (neutral, flexion, and extension positions) and used Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score to assess clinical outcomes. We defined the extension ratio (EXR) as 100 × Ext ROM (cervical range of extension)/ROM (cervical range of motion). We observed the relationships between collected variables (demographic and radiological variables) and LCL. Patients were classified into the following three groups according to the LCL: stability group: (LCL ≤ 5°); mild loss group (5° < LCL ≤ 10°); and severe loss group (LCL > 10°). We compared the differences of collected variables (demographic, surgical and radiological variables) among the three groups.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients were enrolled (mean age 62.92 years; 51 men, 28 women) in the study. Among the three groups, cervical Ext ROM was the best in the stability group (p < 0.01). Compared with the stability group, range of flexion (Flex ROM) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) and EXR was significantly lower (p < 0.01) in the severe loss group. Compared with the severe loss group, JOA recovery rates were better (p < 0.01) in the stability group. Receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis to predict LCL > 10° (area under the curve = 0.808, p < 0.001). The cutoff value for EXR was 16.80%, with sensitivity and specificity of 72.5% and 82.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CLP should be carefully considered for patients with a preoperative low Ext ROM and high Flex ROM, as a significant kyphotic change is likely to develop after surgery. EXR is a useful and simple index to predict significant kyphotic changes.

Laminoplasty is relevant for degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis when there is little risk of postoperative excessive kyphosis during neck flexion

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy frequently have severe symptoms due to spondylolisthesis. The effectiveness of laminoplasty for degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis (DCS) is an important question.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to elucidate factors associated with the outcome of laminoplasty for DCS.

METHOD

Eighty-nine patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) who underwent laminoplasty without instrumented posterior fusion were enrolled. Positive spondylolisthesis was defined as more than 2 mm during neck flexion or extension, from this, 46 DCS cases and 43 non-DCS cases were classified. Radiological parameters, including cervical alignment, balance, range of motion, and slippage along with the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, were obtained before and 1 year after surgery. Factors associated with good surgical outcomes for DCS were analyzed using multivariate logistic analysis.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in background and preoperative JOA score, but the DCS group recovery rate was significantly less (42% vs 53%). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed only the postoperative C2-7 angle during neck flexion was associated with a favorable outcome for DCS (P = 0.0039, Odds ratio: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.14-1.94). Multivariate regression analysis positively correlated the preoperative C2-7 angle in neutral and during flexion with the postoperative C2-7 angle during flexion.

CONCLUSION

The major factor related to poor outcome was the magnitude of postoperative kyphotic C2-7 angle during neck flexion. Slippage was not directly related to outcome and postoperative cervical alignment. Caution is recommended for surgeons performing laminoplasty on patients with risk factors for postoperative excessive kyphotic C2-7 angle during flexion.

Preoperative Decreased Hounsfield Unit Values of Cervical Vertebrae and the Relative Cross-Sectional Area of Flexion/Extension Paraspinal Muscles Are Novel Risk Factors for the Loss of Cervical Lordosis after Open-Door Laminoplasty

Open-door laminoplasty is widely used for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, the loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) seems to be unavoidable in the long-term follow-up after surgery, which may affect the clinical outcomes. The risk factors for this complication are still unclear. In this study, patients who underwent open-door laminoplasty between April 2016 and June 2021 were enrolled. Cervical X-rays were obtained to measure the C2–7 Cobb angle, C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope (T1S) and ranges of motion (ROM). Cervical computed tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were collected to evaluate the cervical Hounsfield unit values (HU) and the relative cross-sectional area (RCSA) of paraspinal muscles, respectively. A total of 42 patients were included and the average follow-up period was 24.9 months. Among the patients, 24 cases (57.1%) had a LCL of more than 5° at a 1-year follow-up and were labeled as members of the LCL group. The follow-up JOA scores were significantly lower in the LCL group (13.9 ± 0.6 vs. 14.4 ± 0.8, p = 0.021) and the mean JOA recovery rate was negatively correlated with LCL (r = −0.409, p = 0.007). In addition, LCL was positively correlated to the preoperative T1S, flexion ROM, flexion/extension ROM and the RCSA of flexion/extension muscles, while it was negatively correlated to extension ROM and the HU value of cervical vertebrae. Furthermore, multiple linear regression showed that preoperative T1S, mean HU value of cervical vertebrae, flexion/extension ROM and the flexion/extension RCSA were independent risk factors for LCL. Spine surgeons should consider these parameters before performing open-door laminoplasty.

Predictors for cervical kyphotic deformity following laminoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Laminoplasty is a common treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). However, approximately 21% of patients undergoing laminoplasty develop cervical kyphotic deformity (KD). Because of the high prevalence rate of KD, several studies have sought to identify predictors for this complication, but the findings remain highly inconsistent. Therefore, the authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to establish reliable preoperative predictors of KD.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were used to systematically extract potential references. The first phase of screening required the studies to be written in the English language, involve patients treated for CSM and/or OPLL via laminoplasty, and report postoperative cervical KD. The second phase required the studies to provide more than 10 patients and include a control group. The mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) were calculated for continuous and dichotomous parameters. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. CSM and OPLL patients were further assessed by performing subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies comprising patients who developed cervical KD (n = 296) and no KD (n = 1254) after receiving cervical laminoplasty for CSM or OPLL were included in the meta-analysis. All studies were retrospective cohorts and were rated as high quality. In the combined univariate analysis of CSM and OPLL patients undergoing laminoplasty, statistically significant predictors for postoperative KD included age (MD 2.22, 95% CI 0.16-4.27, p = 0.03), preoperative BMI (MD 0.85, 95% CI 0.06-1.63, p = 0.04), preoperative C2-7 range of flexion (MD 10.42, 95% Cl 4.24-16.59, p = 0.0009), preoperative C2-7 range of extension (MD -4.59, 95% CI -6.34 to -2.83, p < 0.00001), and preoperative center of gravity of the head to the C7 sagittal vertical axis (MD 26.83, 95% CI 9.13-44.52, p = 0.003). Additionally, among CSM patients, males were identified as having a greater risk for postoperative KD (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.02-2.93, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this study currently provide the largest and most reliable review on preoperative predictors for cervical KD after laminoplasty. Given that several of the included studies identified optimal cutoff points for the variables that are significantly associated with KD, further investigation into the development of a preoperative risk scoring system that can accurately predict KD in the clinical setting is encouraged. PROSPERO registration no.: CRD42022299795 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/).

Segmental cervical instability does not drive the loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

BACKGROUND/CONTEXT

Kyphotic deformity after cervical laminoplasty (CLP) often leads to unfavorable neurological recovery due to insufficient indirect decompression of the spinal cord. Existing literature has described that segmental cervical instability is a contraindication for CLP because it is a potential risk factor for kyphotic changes after surgery; however, this has never been confirmed in any clinical studies.

PURPOSE

To confirm whether segmental cervical instability was an independent risk factor for postoperative kyphotic change and to examine whether segmental cervical instability led to poor neurological outcomes after CLP for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective study PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent CLP for CSM between January 2013 and January 2021 with a follow-up period of ≥1 year were enrolled.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Cervical radiographic measurements including C2-C7 lordosis (C2-7 angle), cervical sagittal vertical axis, C7 slope, flexion range of motion (fROM) and extension ROM (eROM) were assessed using neutral and flexion-extension views. Segmental cervical instability was classified into anterolisthesis (AL) of ≥2 mm displacement, retrolisthesis (RL) of ≥2 mm displacement, and translational instability (TI) of ≥3 mm translational motion. The amount of C2-7 angle loss at the follow-up period compared to the preoperative measurements was defined as cervical lordosis loss (CLL). Neurological outcomes were assessed using the recovery rate of the Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA-RR).

METHODS

CLL was compared among patients with and without segmental cervical instability. Further, multiple linear regression model for CLL was built for the evaluation with adjustment of the reported risks, including cervical sagittal vertical axis, C7 slope, fROM, eROM, and patient age together with AL, RL, and TI, as independent variables. The JOA-RR was also compared between patients with and without segmental cervical instability.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients (mean age, 68.7 years; 65.9% male) were included in the analysis. AL, RL, and TI were found in 12 (8.7%), 33 (23.9%), and 16 (11.6%) patients, respectively. Comparisons among the groups showed that AL led to greater CLL; however, RL and TI did not. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that greater CLL is significantly associated with greater fROM and smaller eROM (regression coefficient [β]=0.328, 95% confidence interval: 0.178 to 0.478, p<.001; β=-0.372, 95% confidence interval: -0.591 to -0.153, p=.001, respectively). However, there were no significant statistical associations in the AL, RL, and TI. Whereas, patients with AL tended to exhibit lower JOA-RR than those without AL (37.8% vs. 52.0%, p=.108).

CONCLUSIONS

Segmental cervical instability is not the definitive driver for loss of cervical lordosis after CLP in patients with CSM; thus, is not a contraindication in and of itself. However, it is necessary to consider the indications for CLP, according to individual cases of patients with AL on baseline radiograph, which is a sign of poor neurological recovery.

Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament

This prospective multicenter study, established by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and involving 27 institutions, aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between laminoplasty (LM) and posterior fusion (PF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), in order to address the controversy surrounding the role of instrumented fusion in cases of posterior surgical decompression for OPLL. 478 patients were considered for participation in the study; from among them, 189 (137 and 52 patients with LM and PF, respectively) were included and evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and radiographical measurements. Basic demographic and radiographical data were reviewed, and the propensity to choose a surgical procedure was calculated. Preoperatively, there were no significant differences among the participants in terms of patient backgrounds, radiographical measurements (K-line or cervical alignment on X-ray, OPLL occupation ratio on computed tomography, increased signal intensity change on magnetic resonance imaging), or clinical status (JOA score and JOACMEQ) after adjustments. The overall risk of perioperative complications was found to be lower with LM (odds ratio [OR] 0.40, p = 0.006), and the rate of C5 palsy occurrence was significantly lower with LM (OR 0.11, p = 0.0002) than with PF. The range of motion (20.91° ± 1.05° and 9.38° ± 1.24°, p < 0.0001) in patients who had PF was significantly smaller than in those who had LM. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference among the participants in JOA score, JOA recovery rate, or JOACMEQ improvement at two years. In contrast, OPLL progression was greater in the LM group than in the PF group (OR 2.73, p = 0.0002). Both LM and PF for cervical myelopathy due to OPLL had resulted in comparable postoperative outcomes at 2 years after surgery.