Preoperative Cervical Range of Motion in Flexion as a Risk Factor for Postoperative Cervical Sagittal Imbalance After Laminoplasty

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate factors associated with cervical sagittal imbalance (CSI) after cervical laminoplasty (LMP).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Preoperative dynamic cervical sagittal alignment is an important predictor for changes in cervical sagittal alignment and clinical outcomes after LMP. However, the impact of preoperative dynamic cervical sagittal alignment on postoperative changes in the cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) after LMP remains unclear. We hypothesized that preoperative cervical flexion and extension function are associated with the changes in cSVA and clinical outcomes and found potential risk factors for post-LMP CSI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing LMP at a single institution between January 2019 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The average follow-up period was 19 months. The parameters were collected before the surgery and at the final follow-up. We defined the changes in cSVA (△cSVA) ≤ -10 mm as the improvement group, -10 mm < △cSVA ≤ 10 mm as the stable group, and △cSVA > 10 mm as the deterioration group. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with postoperative CSI. The χ 2 test was used to compare categorical data between groups. T tests, analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon tests were used to assess the differences between radiographic and clinical parameters among groups. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to identify optimal cutoff values.

RESULTS

The study comprised 102 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The Japanese Orthopedic Association recovery rate was better in the improvement group and a significant aggravation in neck pain was observed in the deterioration group after surgery. Cervical Flex range of motion (ROM; spine range of flexion) was significantly higher in the deterioration group. The multivariate logistic regression model suggested that greater Flex ROM and starting LMP at C3 were significant risk factors for postoperative deterioration of cervical sagittal balance. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the cutoff value for preoperative Flex ROM was 34.10°.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative dynamic cervical sagittal alignment influences postoperative cervical sagittal balance after LMP. Cervical LMP should be carefully considered for patients with a preoperative high Flex ROM, as CSI is likely to occur after surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Assessment of Biomechanical Advantages in Combined Anterior-Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery by Radiological Outcomes: Pedicle Screws over Lateral Mass Screws

BACKGROUND

The combined anterior-posterior approach has shown good clinical outcomes for multilevel cervical diseases. This work describes the biomechanical advantage of cervical-pedicle-screw fixation over lateral-mass-screw fixation in combined anterior-posterior cases.

METHOD

Seventy-six patients who received combined cervical surgery from June 2013 to December 2020 were included. The patients were divided into two groups: the lateral-mass-screw group (LMS) and the pedicle-screw group (PPS). Radiological outcomes were assessed with lateral cervical spine X-rays for evaluating sagittal alignment, subsidence, and bone remodeling.

RESULTS

At 1 year postoperatively, the numbers of patients whose C2-C7 cervical lordosis was less than 20 degrees decreased by more in the PPS group (p-value = 0.001). The amount of vertical-length change from immediately to 1 year postsurgery was less in the PPS group than in the LMS group (p-value = 0.030). The mean vertebral-body-width change was larger in the PPS group than in the LMS group during 3 months to 1 year postsurgery (p-value = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

In combined anterior-posterior cervical surgery cases, maintenance of cervical lordosis and protection of the vertebral body from subsidence were better with the pedicle-screw fixation. More bone remodeling occurred when using the pedicle-screw fixation method.

Evaluation of changes in cervical sagittal balance and clinical parameters in patients undergoing two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an effective method in treating cervical sagittal imbalance and spine deformations.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this work was to assess whether changes of the Cobb angle, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and T1 slope parameters affect the outcomes of surgical treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study was performed in 30 patients qualified for surgical treatment for cervical degenerative disc disease. The ACDF was performed on 2 levels. Every patient underwent an X-ray examination before surgery and 3 months after the procedure. The following parameters were assessed: the T1 slope, the angle of cervical lordosis, the SVA distance, quality of life assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and perceived pain measurement assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

RESULTS

The cervical lordosis angle significantly changed (p < 0.01) to an average of 11.52°. The SVA C2-C7 distance significantly decreased (p < 0.001) to an average of 21.06 mm. The value of the T1 slope angle did not change significantly before and after surgery (p = 0.706). After surgery, statistically significant improvement was achieved on the NDI scale for neck pain (p < 0.001) to an average of 9. The NDI score significantly decreased over time (p < 0.001), and this change was significantly related to the increased Cobb angle (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement in cervical lordosis C2-C7 can improve the outcomes of surgical treatment. Preoperative analysis of X-rays and sagittal balance parameters may be beneficial for treatment outcomes.

Sagittal balance of the cervical spine

The treatment of adult cervical deformity continues to be complex with high complication rates. However there are many new advancements and overall patients do well following surgical correction. To date there are now many types of cervical deformity that have been classified and there exists a variety of surgical options. These recent advances have been developed in the last few years and the field continues to grow at a rapid rate. Thus, the goal of this article is to provide an updated review of cervical sagittal balance including; cervical alignment parameters, deformity classification, clinical evaluation, with both conservative and surgical treatment options.

K-Line Tilt is a Predictor of Postoperative Kyphotic Deformity After Laminoplasty for Cervical Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective single-center study.

OBJECTIVES

K-line is a decision-making tool to determine the appropriate surgical procedures for patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (C-OPLL). Laminoplasty (LAMP) is one of the standard surgical procedures indicated on the basis of K-line measurements (+: OPLL does not cross the K-line). We investigated the impact of K-line tilt, a radiographic parameter of cervical sagittal balance measured using the K-line, on surgical outcomes after LAMP.

METHODS

The study included 62 consecutive patients with K-line (+) C-OPLL who underwent LAMP. The following preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements were evaluated: (1) the K-line, (2) K-line tilt (an angle between the K-line and vertical line), (3) center of gravity of the head -C7 sagittal vertical axis, (4) C2-C7 lordotic angle, (5) C7 slope, and (6) C2-C7 range of motion. Clinical results were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA score).

RESULTS

All the patients had non-kyphotic cervical alignment (CL ≥ 0°) preoperatively; however, kyphotic deformity (CL < 0°) was observed in 6 patients (9.7%) postoperatively. The recovery rate of the C-JOA scores was poor in the kyphotic deformity (+) group (7.8%) than in the kyphotic deformity (-) group (47.5%). The K-line tilt was identified to be a preoperative risk factor in the multivariate analysis, and the cutoff K-line tilt for predicting the postoperative kyphotic deformity was 20°.

CONCLUSIONS

LAMP is not suitable for K-line (+) C-OPLL patients with K-line tilts >20°.

Congenital cervical isthmic spondylolisthesis: A case report

Background:

There are only 20 reported cases of cervical isthmic spondylolisthesis in literature that have been surgically managed either anteriorly or posteriorly. Herein, we report such a case managed with circumferential fusion.

Case Description:

A 27-year-old male became progressively quadriparetic due to cervical isthmic spondylolisthesis at the C6–C7 level. Removal of the posterior arch of C6 with subsequent C5–C7 pedicle screw/rod fixation and anterior interbody fusion resulted in marked recovery and adequate cervical realignment.

Conclusion:

For patients with cervical isthmic spondylolisthesis, circumferential fusion provides the best surgical option to achieve stability and sagittal balance.

Differences in Postoperative Changes of Cervical Sagittal Alignment and Balance After Laminoplasty Between Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To compare postoperative changes of cervical sagittal alignment (CSA) and cervical sagittal balance (CSB) after laminoplasty between cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and to examine impacts of these radiologic changes on neurologic outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 168 consecutive patients with CSM (CSM group) and 51 consecutive patients with OPLL (OPLL group) were included. As indicators of CSA and CSB, the C2-7 angle and C1-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were, respectively, measured before surgery and at 2-year follow-up. Neurologic status was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score before surgery and at 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Whereas both postoperative loss of C2-7 angle and increase of C1-C7 SVA were significantly greater in the elderly subgroup of the CSM group, patient age did not significantly affect these changes in the OPLL group. Preservation of C7 maintained C1-C7 SVA at postoperative 2 years only in the CSM group. Postoperative cervical kyphosis and sagittal imbalance significantly decreased neurologic improvement in the CSM group but not in the OPLL group.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients with CSM have significantly greater postoperative loss of lordosis and increase in C1-C7 SVA than nonelderly patients, and both postoperative kyphotic deformity and sagittal imbalance significantly deteriorate neurologic recovery. On the other hand, although patients with OPLL, irrespective of patient age and preservation of C7, have significantly more loss of lordosis and increase in C1-C7 SVA than CSM patients, neither postoperative kyphotic deformity nor sagittal imbalance significantly deteriorates neurologic recovery in OPLL patients.

Relationship of Cervical Sagittal Vertical Alignment After Sagittal Balance Correction in Adult Spinal Deformity: A Retrospective Radiographic Study

Study Design

Retrospective radiographic study.

Purpose

Predict the variability of the center of gravity of head (COG) relative to the global cervical sagittal alignment (SVA).

Background

Cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and pelvic incidence are considered interrelated, with changes in SVA causing reciprocal changes to bring the head over pelvis. The implications of cervical deformities have generated more interest recently, and it has been shown that poor cervical alignment is associated with poor clinical outcomes.

Methods

Patients were selected from the imaging server of a single institution with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and SVA, who underwent surgical correction from 2008 to 2013. Three observers performed the measurements, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was measured for inter and intraobserver reliability. Group 1 was patients with unbalanced spines (C7-SVA > 5 cm) preoperatively and corrected to full balanced spine (C7-SVA < 5 cm) until last follow-up. Group 2 was improved in sagittal balance after surgery and maintained SVA correction until last follow-up, but not fully balanced.

Results

Fifty-five patients met the inclusion criteria, 42 patients improved in SVA after surgery, and 13 showed no improvement. Twenty-three patients kept full balanced measurements until last follow-up, and 19 patients maintained not-full balanced spine. In group 1, there was no change in pre and postoperative parameters except for C2-CL (21.74° vs 16.91°, P = .033). It was similar in group 2, no differences except for C2-CL (21.67° vs 17.81°, P = .018).

Conclusion

Parameters in this study failed to yield predictable relationships when compared to changes in SVA. The position of COG may be independent of global SVA.

Clinical Relevance

This study aims to improve our understanding of the dynamic changes and relationships of the regional and global spinal parameters with regard to spinal deformity corrective surgeries in adults.

Level of Evidence

III.