1
|
Callaghan-VanderWall ME, Kuo A, Baumann AN, Furey CG, Cheng CW. Factors Predisposing Patients to Nonhome Discharge After Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Retrospective Analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2024; 103:632-637. [PMID: 38206613 DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000002415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to evaluate factors associated with discharge to subacute care after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy. DESIGN This is a retrospective chart review of adults who underwent cervical spine surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy between 2014 and 2020 ( N = 135). RESULTS Patients discharged to a subacute setting were older (68.1 ± 8.6 vs. 64.1 yrs ± 8.8, P = 0.01), more likely to be unmarried (55.8% vs. 33.7% married, P = 0.01), and more likely to have Medicare or Medicaid (83.7% vs. 65.9% private insurance, P = 0.03) than patients discharged home. A posterior surgical approach was associated with discharge to a subacute setting (62.8% vs. 43.5% anterior approach, P = 0.04). A total of 87.8% of patients discharged to a subacute setting required moderate or maximum assistance for bed mobility versus 26.6% of patients discharged home ( P < 0.0001). Compared with patients discharged home, patients discharged to a subacute setting ambulated a shorter distance in their first physical therapy evaluation after surgery (8.9 ± 35.8 vs. 53.7 ± 61.78 m in the home discharge group, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Analysis of these factors may guide discussions about patient expectations for postoperative discharge placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan E Callaghan-VanderWall
- From the Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio (MEC-V, AK); Northeast Ohio Medical University College of Medicine, Rootstown, Ohio (ANB); and the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospitals Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (CGF, CWC)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang E, Mummaneni PV, Chou D, Izima C, Fu KM, Bydon M, Bisson EF, Shaffrey CI, Gottfried ON, Asher AL, Coric D, Potts E, Foley KT, Wang MY, Virk MS, Knightly JJ, Meyer S, Park P, Upadhyaya C, Shaffrey ME, Uribe JS, Tumialán LM, Turner J, Haid RW, Chan AK. Is Upper Extremity or Lower Extremity Function More Important for Patient Satisfaction? An Analysis of 24-Month Outcomes from the QOD Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Cohort. Clin Spine Surg 2024; 37:188-197. [PMID: 38706113 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter registry. OBJECTIVE To assess whether upper or lower limb mJOA improvement more strongly associates with patient satisfaction after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) is commonly used to assess functional status in patients with CSM. Patients present with upper and/or lower extremity dysfunction, and it is unclear whether improvement in one and/or both symptoms drives postoperative patient satisfaction. METHODS This study utilizes the prospective Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) CSM data set. Clinical outcomes included mJOA and North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction. The upper limb mJOA score was defined as upper motor plus sensory mJOA, and the lower limb mJOA as lower motor plus sensory mJOA. Ordered logistic regression was used to determine whether upper or lower limb mJOA was more closely associated with NASS satisfaction, adjusting for other covariates. RESULTS Overall, 1141 patients were enrolled in the QOD CSM cohort. In all, 780 had both preoperative and 24-month mJOA scores, met inclusion criteria, and were included for analysis. The baseline mJOA was 12.1±2.7, and postoperatively, 85.6% would undergo surgery again (NASS 1 or 2, satisfied). Patients exhibited mean improvement in both upper (baseline:3.9±1.4 vs. 24 mo:5.0±1.1, P<0.001) and lower limb mJOA (baseline:3.9±1.4 vs. 24 mon:4.5±1.5, P<0.001); however, the 24-month change in the upper limb mJOA was greater (upper:1.1±1.6 vs. lower:0.6±1.6, P<0.001). Across 24-month NASS satisfaction, the baseline upper and lower limb mJOA scores were similar (pupper=0.28, plower=0.092). However, as satisfaction decreased, the 24-month change in upper and lower limb mJOA decreased as well (pupper<0.001, plower<0.001). Patients with NASS scores of 4 (lowest satisfaction) did not demonstrate significant differences from baseline in upper or lower limb mJOA (P>0.05). In ordered logistic regression, NASS satisfaction was independently associated with upper limb mJOA improvement (OR=0.81; 95% CI: 0.68-0.97; P=0.019) but not lower limb mJOA improvement (OR=0.84; 95% CI: 0.70-1.0; P=0.054). CONCLUSIONS As the magnitude of upper and lower mJOA improvement decreased postoperatively, so too did patient satisfaction with surgical intervention. Upper limb mJOA improvement was a significant independent predictor of patient satisfaction, whereas lower limb mJOA improvement was not. These findings may aid preoperative counseling, stratified by patients' upper and lower extremity treatment expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level-III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunice Yang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, NY
| | | | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, NY
| | - Chiemela Izima
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, NY
| | - Kai-Ming Fu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Mohamad Bydon
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Erica F Bisson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | - Anthony L Asher
- Neuroscience Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System and Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, NC
| | - Domagoj Coric
- Neuroscience Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System and Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, NC
| | - Eric Potts
- Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Kevin T Foley
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee; Semmes-Murphey Neurologic and Spine Institute, Memphis, TN
| | - Michael Y Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Michael S Virk
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | | | - Scott Meyer
- Atlantic Neurosurgical Specialists, Morristown, NJ
| | - Paul Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee; Semmes-Murphey Neurologic and Spine Institute, Memphis, TN
| | | | - Mark E Shaffrey
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | | | - Jay Turner
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | - Andrew K Chan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Agarwal N, DiGiorgio A, Michalopoulos GD, Letchuman V, Chan AK, Shabani S, Lavadi RS, Lu DC, Wang MY, Haid RW, Knightly JJ, Sherrod BA, Gottfried ON, Shaffrey CI, Goldberg JL, Virk MS, Hussain I, Glassman SD, Shaffrey ME, Park P, Foley KT, Pennicooke B, Coric D, Upadhyaya C, Potts EA, Tumialán LM, Fu KMG, Asher AL, Bisson EF, Chou D, Bydon M, Mummaneni PV. Impact of Educational Background on Preoperative Disease Severity and Postoperative Outcomes Among Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Clin Spine Surg 2024; 37:E137-E146. [PMID: 38102749 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. OBJECTIVE Assess differences in preoperative status and postoperative outcomes among patients of different educational backgrounds undergoing surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Patient education level (EL) has been suggested to correlate with health literacy, disease perception, socioeconomic status (SES), and access to health care. METHODS The CSM data set of the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) was queried for patients undergoing surgical management of CSM. EL was grouped as high school or below, graduate-level, and postgraduate level. The association of EL with baseline disease severity (per patient-reported outcome measures), symptoms >3 or ≤3 months, and 24-month patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated. RESULTS Among 1141 patients with CSM, 509 (44.6%) had an EL of high school or below, 471 (41.3%) had a graduate degree, and 161 (14.1%) had obtained postgraduate education. Lower EL was statistically significantly associated with symptom duration of >3 months (odds ratio=1.68), higher arm pain numeric rating scale (NRS) (coefficient=0.5), and higher neck pain NRS (coefficient=0.79). Patients with postgraduate education had statistically significantly lower Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores (coefficient=-7.17), lower arm pain scores (coefficient=-1), and higher quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) scores (coefficient=0.06). Twenty-four months after surgery, patients of lower EL had higher NDI scores, higher pain NRS scores, and lower QALY scores ( P <0.05 in all analyses). CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing surgical management for CSM, those reporting a lower educational level tended to present with longer symptom duration, more disease-inflicted disability and pain, and lower QALY scores. As such, patients of a lower EL are a potentially vulnerable subpopulation, and their health literacy and access to care should be prioritized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitin Agarwal
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Anthony DiGiorgio
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Vijay Letchuman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Andrew K Chan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, NY
| | - Saman Shabani
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Raj Swaroop Lavadi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
| | - Daniel C Lu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Michael Y Wang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jacob L Goldberg
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael S Virk
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Ibrahim Hussain
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Mark E Shaffrey
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Paul Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Semmes-Murphey Neurologic and Spine Institute, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN
| | - Kevin T Foley
- Department of Neurosurgery, Semmes-Murphey Neurologic and Spine Institute, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN
| | - Brenton Pennicooke
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Domagoj Coric
- Neuroscience Institute, Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte
| | - Cheerag Upadhyaya
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Eric A Potts
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Luis M Tumialán
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurologic Institute, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Kai-Ming G Fu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Anthony L Asher
- Neuroscience Institute, Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte
| | - Erica F Bisson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, NY
| | - Mohamad Bydon
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Praveen V Mummaneni
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kumar N, Akosman I, Mortenson R, Xu G, Kumar A, Mostafa E, Rivlin J, De La Garza Ramos R, Krystal J, Eleswarapu A, Yassari R, Fourman MS. Disparities in postoperative complications and perioperative events based on insurance status following elective spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL 2024; 17:100315. [PMID: 38533185 PMCID: PMC10964016 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Revised: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
Background Increasing evidence demonstrates disparities among patients with differing insurance statuses in the field of spine surgery. However, no pooled analyses have performed a robust review characterizing differences in postoperative outcomes among patients with varying insurance types. Methods A comprehensive literature search of the PUBMED, MEDLINE(R), ERIC, and EMBASE was performed for studies comparing postoperative outcomes in patients with private insurance versus government insurance. Pooled incidence rates and odds ratios were calculated for each outcome and meta-analyses were conducted for 3 perioperative events and 2 types of complications. In addition to pooled analysis, sub-analyses were performed for each outcome in specific government payer statuses. Results Thirty-eight studies (5,018,165 total patients) were included. Compared with patients with private insurance, patients with government insurance experienced greater risk of 90-day re-admission (OR 1.84, p<.0001), non-routine discharge (OR 4.40, p<.0001), extended LOS (OR 1.82, p<.0001), any postoperative complication (OR 1.61, p<.0001), and any medical complication (OR 1.93, p<.0001). These differences persisted across outcomes in sub-analyses comparing Medicare or Medicaid to private insurance. Similarly, across all examined outcomes, Medicare patients had a higher risk of experiencing an adverse event compared with non-Medicare patients. Compared with Medicaid patients, Medicare patients were only more likely to experience non-routine discharge (OR 2.68, p=.0007). Conclusions Patients with government insurance experience greater likelihood of morbidity across several perioperative outcomes. Additionally, Medicare patients fare worse than non-Medicare patients across outcomes, potentially due to age-based discrimination. Based on these results, it is clear that directed measures should be taken to ensure that underinsured patients receive equal access to resources and quality care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neerav Kumar
- Weill Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY,
USA
| | | | | | - Grace Xu
- Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Elsamadicy AA, Sayeed S, Sherman JJZ, Craft S, Reeves BC, Hengartner AC, Koo AB, Larry Lo SF, Shin JH, Mendel E, Sciubba DM. Racial/Ethnic Disparities Among Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion or Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A National Administrative Database Analysis. World Neurosurg 2024; 183:e372-e385. [PMID: 38145651 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of racial disparities on surgical outcomes for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). METHODS Adult patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) for CSM were identified from the 2016 to 019 National Inpatient Sample Database using the International Classification of Diseases codes. Patients were categorized based on approach (ACDF or PCDF) and race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic). Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative characteristics, adverse events, and health care resource utilization were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of extended length of stay (LOS), nonroutine discharge (NRD), and exorbitant costs. RESULTS A total of 46,500 patients were identified, of which 36,015 (77.5%) were White, 7465 (16.0%) were Black, and 3020 (6.5%) were Hispanic. Black and Hispanic patients had a greater comorbidity burden compared to White patients (P = 0.001) and a greater incidence of any postoperative complication (P = 0.001). Healthcare resource utilization were greater in the PCDF cohort than the ACDF cohort and greater in Black and Hispanic patients compared to White patients (P < 0.001). Black and Hispanic patient race were significantly associated with extended hospital LOS ([Black] odds ratio [OR]: 2.24, P < 0.001; [Hispanic] OR: 1.64, P < 0.001) and NRD ([Black] OR: 2.33, P < 0.001; [Hispanic] OR: 1.49, P = 0.016). Among patients who underwent PCDF, Black race was independently associated with extended hospital LOS ([Black] OR: 1.77, P < 0.001; [Hispanic] OR: 1.47, P = 0.167) and NRD ([Black] OR: 1.82, P < 0.001; [Hispanic] OR: 1.38, P = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that patient race may influence patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization following ACDF or PCDF for CSM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aladine A Elsamadicy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
| | - Sumaiya Sayeed
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Josiah J Z Sherman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Samuel Craft
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Benjamin C Reeves
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Astrid C Hengartner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Andrew B Koo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sheng-Fu Larry Lo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | - John H Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ehud Mendel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Daniel M Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sherrod BA, Michalopoulos GD, Mulvaney G, Agarwal N, Chan AK, Asher AL, Coric D, Virk MS, Fu KM, Foley KT, Park P, Upadhyaya CD, Knightly JJ, Shaffrey ME, Potts EA, Shaffrey CI, Gottfried ON, Than KD, Wang MY, Tumialán LM, Chou D, Mummaneni PV, Bydon M, Bisson EF. Development of new postoperative neck pain at 12 and 24 months after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a Quality Outcomes Database study. J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 38:357-365. [PMID: 36308471 DOI: 10.3171/2022.9.spine22611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients who undergo surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) will occasionally develop postoperative neck pain that was not present preoperatively, yet the incidence of this phenomenon is unclear. The authors aimed to elucidate patient and surgical factors associated with new-onset sustained pain after CSM surgery. METHODS The authors reviewed data from the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) CSM module. The presence of neck pain was defined using the neck pain numeric rating scale (NRS). Patients with no neck pain at baseline (neck NRS score ≤ 1) were then stratified based on the presence of new postoperative pain development (neck NRS score ≥ 2) at 12 and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS Of 1141 patients in the CSM QOD, 224 (19.6%) reported no neck pain at baseline. Among 170 patients with no baseline neck pain and available 12-month follow-up, 46 (27.1%) reported new postoperative pain. Among 184 patients with no baseline neck pain and available 24-month follow-up, 53 (28.8%) reported new postoperative pain. The mean differences in neck NRS scores were 4.3 for those with new postoperative pain compared with those without at 12 months (4.4 ± 2.2 vs 0.1 ± 0.3, p < 0.001) and 3.9 at 24 months (4.1 ± 2.4 vs 0.2 ± 0.4, p < 0.001). The majority of patients reporting new-onset neck pain reported being satisfied with surgery, but their satisfaction was significantly lower compared with patients without pain at the 12-month (66.7% vs 94.3%, p < 0.001) and 24-month (65.4% vs 90.8%, p < 0.001) follow-ups. The baseline Neck Disability Index (NDI) was an independent predictor of new postoperative neck pain at both the 12-month and 24-month time points (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.06; p = 0.002; and aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05; p = 0.026, respectively). The total number of levels treated was associated with new-onset neck pain at 12 months (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.09-1.64; p = 0.005), and duration of symptoms more than 3 months was a predictor of 24-month neck pain (aOR 3.22, 95% CI 1.01-10.22; p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS Increased NDI at baseline, number of levels treated surgically, and duration of symptoms longer than 3 months preoperatively correlate positively with the risk of new-onset neck pain following CSM surgery. The majority of patients with new-onset neck pain still report satisfaction from surgery, suggesting that the risk of new-onset neck pain should not hinder indicated operations from being performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon A Sherrod
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Graham Mulvaney
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates and Neuroscience Institute, Carolinas Health Care System, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Nitin Agarwal
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Andrew K Chan
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Anthony L Asher
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates and Neuroscience Institute, Carolinas Health Care System, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Domagoj Coric
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates and Neuroscience Institute, Carolinas Health Care System, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Michael S Virk
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Kai-Ming Fu
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Kevin T Foley
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee and Semmes Murphey Clinic, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Paul Park
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Cheerag D Upadhyaya
- 9Saint Luke's Neurological and Spine Surgery, Kansas City, Missouri
- 10Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - John J Knightly
- 11Atlantic Neurosurgical Specialists, Morristown, New Jersey
| | - Mark E Shaffrey
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Eric A Potts
- 13Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University; Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Oren N Gottfried
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Khoi D Than
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michael Y Wang
- 14Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, Florida; and
| | | | - Dean Chou
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Praveen V Mummaneni
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Mohamad Bydon
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Erica F Bisson
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chan AK, Shaffrey CI, Gottfried ON, Park C, Than KD, Bisson EF, Bydon M, Asher AL, Coric D, Potts EA, Foley KT, Wang MY, Fu KM, Virk MS, Knightly JJ, Meyer S, Park P, Upadhyaya C, Shaffrey ME, Buchholz AL, Tumialán LM, Turner JD, Michalopoulos GD, Sherrod BA, Agarwal N, Chou D, Haid RW, Mummaneni PV. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy with severe axial neck pain: is anterior or posterior approach better? J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 38:42-55. [PMID: 36029264 DOI: 10.3171/2022.6.spine22110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine whether multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCLF) is superior for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and high preoperative neck pain. METHODS This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data using the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) CSM module. Patients who received a subaxial fusion of 3 or 4 segments and had a visual analog scale (VAS) neck pain score of 7 or greater at baseline were included. The 3-, 12-, and 24-month outcomes were compared for patients undergoing ACDF with those undergoing PCLF. RESULTS Overall, 1141 patients with CSM were included in the database. Of these, 495 (43.4%) presented with severe neck pain (VAS score > 6). After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, we compared 65 patients (54.6%) undergoing 3- and 4-level ACDF and 54 patients (45.4%) undergoing 3- and 4-level PCLF. Patients undergoing ACDF had worse Neck Disability Index scores at baseline (52.5 ± 15.9 vs 45.9 ± 16.8, p = 0.03) but similar neck pain (p > 0.05). Otherwise, the groups were well matched for the remaining baseline patient-reported outcomes. The rates of 24-month follow-up for ACDF and PCLF were similar (86.2% and 83.3%, respectively). At the 24-month follow-up, both groups demonstrated mean improvements in all outcomes, including neck pain (p < 0.05). In multivariable analyses, there was no significant difference in the degree of neck pain change, rate of neck pain improvement, rate of pain-free achievement, and rate of reaching minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in neck pain between the two groups (adjusted p > 0.05). However, ACDF was associated with a higher 24-month modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA) score (β = 1.5 [95% CI 0.5-2.6], adjusted p = 0.01), higher EQ-5D score (β = 0.1 [95% CI 0.01-0.2], adjusted p = 0.04), and higher likelihood for return to baseline activities (OR 1.2 [95% CI 1.1-1.4], adjusted p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Severe neck pain is prevalent among patients undergoing surgery for CSM, affecting more than 40% of patients. Both ACDF and PCLF achieved comparable postoperative neck pain improvement 3, 12, and 24 months following 3- or 4-segment surgery for patients with CSM and severe neck pain. However, multilevel ACDF was associated with superior functional status, quality of life, and return to baseline activities at 24 months in multivariable adjusted analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew K Chan
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Oren N Gottfried
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christine Park
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Khoi D Than
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Erica F Bisson
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Mohamad Bydon
- 3Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Anthony L Asher
- 4Neuroscience Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System and Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Domagoj Coric
- 4Neuroscience Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System and Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Eric A Potts
- 5Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Kevin T Foley
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee, Semmes-Murphey Neurologic and Spine Institute, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Michael Y Wang
- 7Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Florida
| | - Kai-Ming Fu
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Michael S Virk
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Scott Meyer
- 9Atlantic Neurosurgical Specialists, Morristown, New Jersey
| | - Paul Park
- 10Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Cheerag Upadhyaya
- 11Marion Bloch Neuroscience Institute, Saint Luke's Health System, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Mark E Shaffrey
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Avery L Buchholz
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Jay D Turner
- 13Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Brandon A Sherrod
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Nitin Agarwal
- 14Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Dean Chou
- 14Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Regis W Haid
- 15Atlanta Brain and Spine Care, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Praveen V Mummaneni
- 14Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| |
Collapse
|