Endoscopic endonasal approach for suprasellar meningiomas: introduction of a new scoring system to predict extent of resection and assist in case selection with long-term outcome data

Outcomes of Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Tuberculum Sellae and Planum Sphenoidale Meningiomas: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate clinical outcomes and volumetric changes following endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for tuberculum sellae (TS) and planum sphenoidale (PS) meningiomas. Key objectives included evaluating pre- and postoperative tumor volumes, visual assessments and EEA-related complications.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study was conducted at Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Canada, from 2009 to 2022 including 24 patients meeting inclusion criteria for midline skull base tumors, confirmed as WHO Grade I or II meningiomas with optic canal extension.

RESULTS

EEA achieved gross total resection in 87.5% of cases, with a mean tumor volume reduction of 92.24%. Postoperatively, 91.67% exhibited visual improvement or stability. Cerebrospinal fluid leaks occurred in 12.5% of cases, necessitating revision surgery in one case. Persistent postoperative endocrine dysfunction affected 4.17%. Preoperative tumor volume did not demonstrate a correlation with complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study delivers reproducible data for pre- and postoperative tumor volume following the EEA after TS or PS meningiomas. The EEA demonstrated favorable radiographic and clinical outcomes in TS and PS meningiomas, achieving gross total resection with minimal morbidity.

Minimally invasive approach for skull base meningiomas

INTRODUCTION

Skull base meningiomas constitute a complex group of skull base tumors. The endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) and endoscopic Keyhole have a minimally invasive philosophy with high effectiveness, safety, and a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity in these tumors.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the results of the use of minimally invasive approaches to skull base meningiomas.

METHOD

A descriptive, retrospective study was carried out in 140 patients at the "Hermanos Ameijeiras" Hospital who underwent surgery for cranial base meningiomas using minimally invasive approaches to the cranial base. The degree of tumor resection, tumor recurrence, reinterventions, and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

ESA were used in 72.8% of the study, while endoscopic Keyholes were used in 26.4% and combined approaches in 0.7%. In relation to total tumor resection, 91.9% was generally achieved. Overall tumor recurrence and reinterventions were less than 8.5% and 4%, respectively. Complications in ESA were: cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula (2.1%), diabetes insipidus, hydrocephalus, cerebral infarction, surgical site hematoma, worsening of cranial nerves I-IV (1.4%) respectively. While in the Keyhole type approaches: seizures (2.9%), hydrocephalus (1.4%), CSF fistula (1.4%), worsening of Nerves IX-XII (0.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The following study reaffirms that minimally invasive approaches for skull base meningiomas constitute advanced surgical techniques for these tumors, associated with a low rate of postoperative complications.

Endonasal Route for Tuberculum and Planum Meningiomas

Tuberculum and planum meningiomas are challenging tumors per their critical location and neurovascular relationships. The standard treatment is usually represented by complete tumor removal, being the transcranial approaches the well-established routes. During the last decades, novel surgical routes have been experimented with emphasis on the concept of minimal invasive approaches. The peculiar perspective from below the endoscopic endonasal approach provides a short and direct access avoiding brain and neurovascular structures manipulation, featuring excellent outcomes and a reduced morbidity. Ideal indications are small or medium size midline meningiomas, with wide tuberculum sellae angle and deep sella at the sphenoid sinus, possibly with no optic nerve and/or vessels encasement. Adequate removal of paranasal structures and extended bony opening over the dural attachment provide a wide surgical corridor ensuring safe intradural exposure at the suprasellar area. The main advantage is related to early decompression of the optic apparatus and reduced manipulation of subchiasmatic perforating vessels, with improved visual outcomes. Direct exposure of the inferomedial aspect of the optic canals allows for maximal decompression in cases of tumor extending within. Transcranial approaches tend to be selected for larger tumors with lateral extension beyond optic nerves and supraclinoid carotid arteries, in inaccessible areas from an endonasal corridor.

International Tuberculum Sellae Meningioma Study: Surgical Outcomes and Management Trends

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) can be resected through transcranial (TCA) or expanded endonasal approach (EEA). The objective of this study was to report TSM management trends and outcomes in a large multicenter cohort.

METHODS

This is a 40-site retrospective study using standard statistical methods.

RESULTS

In 947 cases, TCA was used 66.4% and EEA 33.6%. The median maximum diameter was 2.5 cm for TCA and 2.1 cm for EEA ( P < .0001). The median follow-up was 26 months. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 70.2% and did not differ between EEA and TCA ( P = .5395). Vision was the same or better in 87.5%. Vision improved in 73.0% of EEA patients with preoperative visual deficits compared with 57.1% of TCA patients ( P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, a TCA (odds ratio [OR] 1.78, P = .0258) was associated with vision worsening, while GTR was protective (OR 0.37, P < .0001). GTR decreased with increased diameter (OR: 0.80 per cm, P = .0036) and preoperative visual deficits (OR 0.56, P = .0075). Mortality was 0.5%. Complications occurred in 23.9%. New unilateral or bilateral blindness occurred in 3.3% and 0.4%, respectively. The cerebrospinal fluid leak rate was 17.3% for EEA and 2.2% for TCA (OR 9.1, P < .0001). The recurrence rate was 10.9% (n = 103). Longer follow-up (OR 1.01 per month, P < .0001), World Health Organization II/III (OR 2.20, P = .0262), and GTR (OR: 0.33, P < .0001) were associated with recurrence. The recurrence rate after GTR was lower after EEA compared with TCA (OR 0.33, P = .0027).

CONCLUSION

EEA for appropriately selected TSM may lead to better visual outcomes and decreased recurrence rates after GTR, but cerebrospinal fluid leak rates are high, and longer follow-up is needed. Tumors were smaller in the EEA group, and follow-up was shorter, reflecting selection, and observation bias. Nevertheless, EEA may be superior to TCA for appropriately selected TSM.

International Tuberculum Sellae Meningioma Study: Preoperative Grading Scale to Predict Outcomes and Propensity-Matched Outcomes by Endonasal Versus Transcranial Approach

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tuberculum sellae meningiomas are resected via an expanded endonasal (EEA) or transcranial approach (TCA). Which approach provides superior outcomes is debated. The Magill-McDermott (M-M) grading scale evaluating tumor size, optic canal invasion, and arterial involvement remains to be validated for outcome prediction. The objective of this study was to validate the M-M scale for predicting visual outcome, extent of resection (EOR), and recurrence, and to use propensity matching by M-M scale to determine whether visual outcome, EOR, or recurrence differ between EEA and TCA.

METHODS

Forty-site retrospective study of 947 patients undergoing tuberculum sellae meningiomas resection. Standard statistical methods and propensity matching were used.

RESULTS

The M-M scale predicted visual worsening (odds ratio [OR]/point: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.02-1.46, P = .0271) and gross total resection (GTR) (OR/point: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.62-0.81, P < .0001), but not recurrence ( P = .4695). The scale was simplified and validated in an independent cohort for predicting visual worsening (OR/point: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.33-4.14, P = .0032) and GTR (OR/point: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57-0.93, P = .0127), but not recurrence ( P = .2572). In propensity-matched samples, there was no difference in visual worsening ( P = .8757) or recurrence ( P = .5678) between TCA and EEA, but GTR was more likely with TCA (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.02-2.18, P = .0409). Matched patients with preoperative visual deficits who had an EEA were more likely to have visual improvement than those undergoing TCA (72.9% vs 58.4%, P = .0010) with equal rates of visual worsening (EEA 8.0% vs TCA 8.6%, P = .8018).

CONCLUSION

The refined M-M scale predicts visual worsening and EOR preoperatively. Preoperative visual deficits are more likely to improve after EEA; however, individual tumor features must be considered during nuanced approach selection by experienced neurosurgeons.

Lateral Transorbital Endoscope-Assisted Approach to the Cavernous Sinus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Surgical access to the cavernous sinus (CS) poses a unique challenge to the neurosurgeon given the concentration of delicate structures in the confines of a very small anatomic space. The lateral transorbital approach (LTOA) is a minimally invasive, keyhole approach that can provide direct access to the lateral CS.

METHODS

A retrospective review of CS lesions treated by a LTOA at a single institution was performed between 2020 and 2023. Patient indications, surgical outcomes, and complications are described.

RESULTS

Six patients underwent a LTOA for a variety of pathologies including a dermoid cyst, schwannoma, prolactinoma, craniopharyngioma, and solitary fibrous tumor. The goals of surgery (ie, drainage of cyst, debulking, and pathological diagnosis) were achieved in all cases. The mean extent of resection was 64.6% (±34%). Half of the patients with preoperative cranial neuropathies (n = 4) improved postoperatively. There were no new permanent cranial neuropathies. One patient had a vascular injury repaired endovascularly with no neurological deficits.

CONCLUSION

The LTOA provides a minimal access corridor to the lateral CS. Careful case selection and reasonable goals of surgery are critical to successful outcome.

Visual Outcomes and Surgical Approach Selection Focusing on Active Optic Canal Decompression and Maximum Safe Resection for Suprasellar Meningiomas

The goal of treating patients with suprasellar meningioma is improving or preserving visual function while achieving long-term tumor control. We retrospectively examined patient and tumor characteristics and surgical and visual outcomes in 30 patients with a suprasellar meningioma who underwent resection via an endoscopic endonasal (15 patients), sub-frontal (8 patients), or anterior interhemispheric (7 patients) approach. Approach selection was based on the presence of optic canal invasion, vascular encasement, and tumor extension. Optic canal decompression and exploration were performed as key surgical procedures. Simpson grade 1 to 3 resection was achieved in 80% of cases. Among the 26 patients with pre-existing visual dysfunction, vision at discharge improved in 18 patients (69.2%), remained unchanged in six (23.1%), and deteriorated in two (7.7%). Further gradual visual recovery and/or maintenance of useful vision were also observed during follow-up. We propose an algorithm for selecting the appropriate surgical approach to a suprasellar meningioma based on preoperative radiologic tumor characteristics. The algorithm focuses on effective optic canal decompression and maximum safe resection, possibly contributing to favorable visual outcomes.

Contralateral subfrontal approach for tuberculum sellae meningioma: techniques and clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) present a burdensome surgical challenge because of their adjacency to vital neurovascular structures. The contralateral subfrontal approach provides an outstanding corridor for removing a TSM with an excellent visual outcome and limited complications. The authors present their long-term surgical experience in treating TSMs via the contralateral subfrontal approach and discuss patient selection, surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2021, the authors used the contralateral subfrontal approach in 74 consecutive patients presenting with TSMs. The surgical decision-making process and surgical techniques are described, and the clinical outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 54.4 years, with a female predominance (n = 61, 82%). Preoperatively, 61 patients (82%) had vision symptoms and 73 (99%) had optic canal invasion by tumor. Gross-total resection was achieved in almost all patients (n = 70, 95%). The visual function improvement and stabilization rate was 91% (67/74). Eight patients (11%) showed a worsening of visual function on the less-compromised (approach-side) optic nerve. There was no occurrence of cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Four patients (5%) experienced recurrences after the initial operation (mean follow-up duration 63 months). There were no deaths in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The contralateral subfrontal approach provides a high chance of complete tumor removal and visual improvement with limited complications and recurrences, especially when the tumor is in a unilateral or midline location causing unilateral visual symptoms or bilateral asymmetrical visual symptoms, regardless of tumor size or encasement of major vessels. With the appropriate patient selection, surgical technique, and familiarity with surrounding neurovascular structures, this approach is reliable for TSM surgery.

Lateral supraorbital approach for resection of large and giant olfactory groove meningiomas: a single center experience

BACKGROUND

The lateral supraorbital approach (LSO) provides an optimal access corridor for various skull bases lesions, including olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs). The aim of this study is to describe the authors' experience with the management of large and giant OGMs utilizing the LSO approach and describe the technical nuances of the procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective review of seven patients with large and giant OGMs managed with the LSO approach between 2013 and 2019 was performed. Radiographic and clinical data were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Seven patients with large and giant OGMs underwent surgical resection via the LSO approach. Six patients were female, with a median age of 56 years. Patients commonly presented with altered mentation, anosmia, and headaches. The average tumor volume was 120.6 ± 64.7 cm³ with five cases of vascular encasement. Simpson grade II resection was achieved in four patients while Simpson grade IV resection was achieved in three patients. The median length of stay was 2.0 days. The median preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score was 70, improving to 100 at last postoperative follow-up visit. Two complications were encountered in the form of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak in one patient and a transient diplopia in another patient. Tumor recurrence/progression was identified in two patients during a median follow-up time of 65.5 months. Both cases have been managed with adjuvant radiosurgery.

CONCLUSION

The LSO approach is a safe and effective minimally invasive transcranial corridor for the management of OGMs that should be part of the armamentarium of skull base neurosurgeons.

Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Uncommon Pathologies of the Sellar and Parasellar Regions

Endoscopic skull base surgery has become an integral part of the present neurosurgical armamentarium. The pioneering efforts in which the purely endoscopic transsphenoidal approach was introduced have triggered a growing tide of using the endoscopic endonasal procedures for a large variety of skull base lesions. Because of their anatomical peculiarities, lesions of the sellar and parasellar regions lend themselves very well to the endoscopic endonasal approaches. Apart from the common pathological entities, many other less frequent pathologies are encountered in the sellar and parasellar area. In this chapter, we review the surgical technique of the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach and its extensions applied to a variety of rare and uncommon pathological entities involving the sella turcica and clivus. An overview of these pathological entities is also presented and exemplified.

Surgical outcomes and longitudinal quality of life after endoscopic endonasal surgery for anterior skull base meningioma

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to establish the effect of endoscopic endonasal surgery on longitudinal quality of life (QOL) in patients with anterior skull base meningioma.

METHODS

A prospectively collected cohort of consecutively operated anterior skull base meningiomas was analyzed. All cases were performed using the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). Sinonasal-specific and overall QOL were measured using the 22-Item Sinonasal Outcome Test and the Anterior Skull Base Questionnaire longitudinally (at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months) across the first postoperative year. The relationship between surgical and QOL outcomes to clinical and radiological characteristics was analyzed using multivariate regression.

RESULTS

Fifty cases were available, with a mean age of 61.5 years and female predominance (74.0%). Visual dysfunction and headache were the most common presenting symptoms, and tumors commonly took origin from the planum (46.0%), tuberculum (44.0%), and olfactory groove (24.0%). Median tumor volume was 4.6 cm3. Visual improvement was noted in 73.1% of cases with preoperative field deficits, while nonimprovement was associated with greater tumor height (p = 0.04). Gross-total resection was not possible in patients with 360° vessel encasement and high-grade cavernous sinus extension with ophthalmoplegia. Postoperative diabetes insipidus was observed only in cases with suprasellar extension. Sinonasal-specific QOL worsened transiently after surgery but returned to baseline levels after 3 weeks. Olfaction and taste scores returned to preoperative baseline scores within the year. Overall QOL at presentation was worse in those with larger tumors (p = 0.04) and visual failure (p = 0.04) and better in those presenting with headache (p = 0.04). Transient worsening of QOL was seen in the first 3 weeks, which returned to baseline by 6 weeks, and then improved to above preoperative levels at 6 months and beyond. Worse QOL at baseline (p = 0.01) and visual improvement (p = 0.01) predicted QOL improvement after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Longitudinal QOL in anterior skull base meningioma has been examined for the first time. Endoscopic endonasal surgery improves overall QOL after a transient 3-week worsening due to the sinonasal morbidity of the approach. Visual function is intimately tied to QOL, with worse vision associated with worse preoperative QOL, and QOL improving in parallel with visual restoration after surgery. The EEA is associated with better visual outcomes and should be the preferred approach in accessible tumors.

Endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for planum sphenoidale versus tuberculum sellae meningiomas

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine if the distinction between planum sphenoidale (PS) and tuberculum sellae (TS) meningiomas is clinically meaningful and impacts the results of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA).

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients who were 18 years of age or older and underwent EEA for newly diagnosed grade I PS meningiomas (PSMs) and TS meningiomas (TSMs) between October 2007 and May 2021 were included. The PS and TS were distinguished by drawing a line passing through the center of the TS and perpendicular to the PS on postcontrast T1-weighted MRI. Probabilistic heatmaps were created to display the actual distribution of tumor volumes. Tumor volume, extent of resection (EOR), visual outcome, and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

The 47 tumors were distributed in a smooth continuum. Using an arbitrary definition, 24 (51%) were PSMs and 23 (49%) were TSMs. The mean volume of PSMs was 5.6 cm3 compared with 4.5 cm3 for TSMs. Canal invasion was present in 87.5% of PSMs and 52% of TSMs. GTR was achieved in 38 (84%) of 45 cases in which it was the goal, slightly less frequently for PSMs (78%) compared with TSMs (91%), although the difference was not significant. Th mean EOR was 99% ± 2% for PSMs and 98% ± 11% for TSMs. Neither the suprasellar notch angle nor the percentage of tumor above the PS impacted the rate of GTR. After a median follow-up of 28.5 months (range 0.1–131 months), there were 2 (5%) recurrences after GTR (n = 38) both of which occurred in patients with PSMs. Forty-two (89%) patients presented with preoperative impaired vision. Postoperative vision was stable or improved in 96% of patients with PSMs and 91% of patients with TSMs. CSF leakage occurred in 4 (16.6%) patients with a PSM, which resolved with only lumbar drainage, and in 1 (4.3%) patient with a TSM, which required reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

PSM and TSMs arise in a smooth distribution, making the distinction arbitrary. Those classified as PSMs were larger and more likely to invade the optic canals. Surgical outcome for both locations was similar, slightly favoring TSMs. The arbitrary distinction between PSMs and TSMs is less useful at predicting outcome than the lateral extent of the tumor, regardless of the site of origin.

Extended endoscopic transorbital approach with superior-lateral orbital rim osteotomy: cadaveric feasibility study and clinical implications (SevEN-007)

OBJECTIVE

The endoscopic transorbital approach (ETOA) has been developed, permitting a new surgical corridor. Due to the vertical limitation of the ETOA, some lesions of the anterior cranial fossa are difficult to access. The ETOA with superior-lateral orbital rim (SLOR) osteotomy can achieve surgical freedom of vertical as well as horizontal movement. The purpose of this study was to confirm the feasibility of the ETOA with SLOR osteotomy.

METHODS

Anatomical dissections were performed in 5 cadaveric heads with a neuroendoscope and neuronavigation system. ETOA with SLOR osteotomy was performed on one side of the head, and ETOA with lateral orbital rim (LOR) osteotomy was performed on the other side. After analysis of the results of the cadaveric study, the ETOA with SLOR osteotomy was applied in 6 clinical cases.

RESULTS

The horizontal and vertical movement range through ETOA with SLOR osteotomy (43.8° ± 7.49° and 36.1° ± 3.32°, respectively) was improved over ETOA with LOR osteotomy (31.8° ± 5.49° and 23.3° ± 1.34°, respectively) (p < 0.01). Surgical freedom through ETOA with SLOR osteotomy (6025.1 ± 220.1 mm3) was increased relative to ETOA with LOR osteotomy (4191.3 ± 57.2 mm3) (p < 0.01); these values are expressed as the mean ± SD. Access levels of ETOA with SLOR osteotomy were comfortable, including anterior skull base lesion and superior orbital area. The view range of the endoscope for anterior skull base lesions was increased through ETOA with SLOR osteotomy. After SLOR osteotomy, the space for moving surgical instruments and the endoscope was widened. Anterior clinoidectomy could be achieved successfully using ETOA with SLOR osteotomy. The authors performed ETOA with SLOR osteotomy in 6 cases of brain tumor. In all 6 cases, complete removal of the tumor was successfully accomplished. In the 3 cases of anterior clinoidal meningioma, anterior clinoidectomy was performed easily and safely, and manipulation of the extended dural margin and origin dura mater was possible. There was no complication related to this approach.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors evaluated the clinical feasibility of ETOA with SLOR osteotomy based on a cadaveric study. ETOA with SLOR osteotomy could be applied to more diverse disease groups that do not permit conventional ETOA or to cases in which surgical application is challenging. ETOA with SLOR osteotomy might serve as an opportunity to broaden the indication for the ETOA.

Midline Skull Base Meningiomas: Transcranial and Endonasal Perspectives

Simple Summary

Skull base meningiomas have always represented a challenge for neurosurgeons. Despite their histological nature, they may be associated with unfavorable outcomes due to their deep-seated location and the surrounding neurovascular structures. Over time, several corridors have been proposed, each one carrying its own pros and cons. During the last decades, the endoscopic endonasal route has been asserted among the classic routes for a growing number of midline and paramedian lesions. Therefore, the aim of our paper is to present a comprehensive review of the indications and techniques for the management of skull base meningiomas, emphasizing the ambivalent and complementary role of the low and high routes.

Abstract

Skull base meningiomas have always represented a challenge for neurosurgeons. Despite their histological nature, they may be associated with unfavorable outcomes due to their deep-seated location and the surrounding neurovascular structures. The state of the art of skull base meningiomas accounts for both transcranial, or high, and endonasal, or low, routes. A comprehensive review of the pertinent literature was performed to address the surgical strategies and outcomes of skull base meningioma patients treated through a transcranial approach, an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA), or both. Three databases (PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Ovid Embase) have been searched. The review of the literature provided 328 papers reporting the surgical, oncological, and clinical results of different approaches for the treatment of skull base meningiomas. The most suitable surgical corridors for olfactory groove, tuberculum sellae, clival and petroclival and cavernous sinus meningiomas have been analyzed. The EEA was proven to be associated with a lower extent of resection rates and better clinical outcomes compared with transcranial corridors, offering the possibility of achieving the so-called maximal safe resection.

Endocrinological outcomes after transcranial resection of tuberculum sellae meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) arise from the anterior skull base. Endocrine status after TSM resection is an important determinant of quality of life. We sought to better characterize the risk of postoperative endocrinopathy for patients with TSM undergoing open transcranial approach (TCA) microsurgical resection. A systematic review was conducted following MOOSE and PRISMA guidelines. Results were screened against predefined criteria, which included studies evaluating endocrinopathy rates after open transcranial microsurgery for TSM. Outcome incidence was calculated using random-effect meta-analysis of proportions. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 406 patients. The average age of the cohort was 52.2 years, and a majority (70%) of the patients were female. The pooled incidence of postoperative transient diabetes insipidus (DI) was 7.5% (95% CI 2.9-12%; p = 0.001; I² = 75.9%) and permanent DI was 1.6% (95% CI 0.3-2.7%; p = 0.01; I² = 0%). The pooled rate of postoperative hypopituitarism was 3.6% (95% CI 1.6-5.7%; p < 0.001; I² = 22.2%), while the incidence of hyperprolactinemia was 1.3% (95% CI 0.1 = 2.6%; p = 0.036; I² = 8.74%). The incidence of SIADH was 4% in one study but was not included in the meta-analysis. Endocrinopathy after TSM microsurgical resection is rare, but the available studies' poor quality of evidence and inconsistent methodology may reflect that it is underreported in the literature. Nevertheless, clinicians should consider the risk of hormonal impairment and counsel their patients accordingly when selecting a TCA for these lesions.

COVID-19: A Time Like No Other in (the Department of) Neurological Surgery

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has disrupted lives and indelibly impacted the practice of medicine since emerging as a pandemic in March 2020. For neurosurgery departments throughout the United States, the pandemic has created unique challenges across subspecialties in devising methods of triage, workflow, and operating room safety. Located in New York City, at the early epicenter of the COVID-19 crisis, the Weill Cornell Medicine Department of Neurological Surgery was disrupted and challenged in many ways, requiring adaptations in clinical operations, workforce management, research, and education. Through our department's collective experience, we offer a glimpse at how our faculty and administrators overcame obstacles, and transformed in the process, at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Minimally Invasive Approaches to Anterior Skull Base Meningiomas

Objective Anterior skull base meningiomas include olfactory groove, planum sphenoidale, and tuberculum sellae lesions. Traditionally, standard craniotomy approaches have been used to access meningiomas in these locations. More recently, minimally invasive techniques including supraorbital and endonasal endoscopic approaches have gained favor; however there are limited published series comparing the use of these two techniques for these meningiomas. Using our patent database, we identified patients who underwent these two approaches, and conducted a retrospective chart review to compare outcomes between these two techniques.

Methods A total of 32 patients who underwent minimally invasive approaches were identified: 20 supraorbital and 11 endoscopic endonasal. Radiographic images, presenting complaints and outcomes, were analyzed retrospectively. The safety of each approach was evaluated.

Results The mean extent of resection through a supraorbital approach was significantly greater than that of the endoscopic endonasal approach, 88.1 vs. 57.9%, respectively (p = 0.016). Overall, preoperative visual acuity and anopsia deficits were more frequent in the endonasal group that persisted postoperatively (visual acuity: p = 0.004; anopsia: p = 0.011). No major complications including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks or wound-related complications were identified in the supraorbital craniotomy group, while the endonasal group had two CSF leaks requiring lumbar drain placement. Length of stay was shorter in the supraorbital group (3.4 vs. 6.1 days, p < 0.001).

Conclusion Anterior skull base meningiomas can be successfully managed by both supraorbital and endoscopic endonasal approaches. Both approaches provide excellent direct access to tumor in carefully selected patients and are safe and efficient, but patient factors and symptoms should dictate the approach selected.