Outcome of endovascular treatment in acute basilar artery occlusion with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 10-19

Meta-analysis of clinical and safety profiles after reperfusion therapy in acute posterior circulation strokes: insights and implications

BACKGROUND

Posterior circulation stroke (PCS) accounts for approximately 20% of all acute ischemic strokes. The optimal reperfusion therapy for PCS management remains uncertain.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prevalence and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), and bridging therapy in PCS patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of 19 studies examining reperfusion therapy outcomes in PCS patients, including 9765 individuals. We pooled prevalence data and assessed associations between reperfusion therapies and clinical, safety, and recanalization outcomes using random-effects models.

RESULTS

The pooled prevalence of reperfusion therapies post-acute PCS was 39% for IVT, 54% for EVT, and 48% for bridging therapy. EVT was associated with significantly higher odds of favorable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Score [mRS] 0-3) at 90 days compared to standard medical therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 5.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.07-15.59; P = 0.001). Conversely, bridging therapy was linked to reduced odds of favorable functional outcomes at 90 days compared to EVT (OR = 0.35; 95% CI=0.26-0.47; P < 0.001). Bridging therapy was also significantly associated with lower odds of good functional outcomes (mRS 0-2) (OR = 0.25; 95% CI=0.11-0.54; P < 0.001), reduced risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 0.26; 95% CI=0.07-0.68; P = 0.009), lower mortality (OR = 0.13; 95% CI=0.04-0.44; P = 0.001), and less successful recanalization (OR = 0.35; 95% CI=0.13-0.94; P = 0.038) relative to EVT.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis underscores the favorable outcomes associated with EVT in PCS cases. With notable reperfusion rates, understanding factors influencing PCS outcomes can inform patient selection and prognostic considerations.

Real-world safety and efficacy endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment for basilar artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

We acknowledge that between endovascular treatment (EVT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach, with some evidence of benefits observed in clinical trials. However, there remains a significant gap in the evidence regarding the real-world application and effectiveness of EVT.The objective of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy differences between EVT and standard medical treatment (SMT) in patients with basilar artery occlusion(BAO).

METHODS

Real-world studies (RWSs) on patients with BAO who underwent EVT and SMT were identified through searches in EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases. The efficacy outcomes included good clinical outcomes [defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0-3 at 90 days], excellence clinical outcomes (defined as mRS scores of 0-2 at 90 days), 90-day mortality rate, and reperfusion status. The safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Subgroup analysis was conducted based on study type (prospective and retrospective studies). The relationship between EVT and SMT with the prognosis of BAO patients was expressed using odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

RESULTS

The seven studies involved a total of 2885 patients. After conducting sensitivity analysis and excluding articles with high heterogeneity, EVT demonstrated a significant association with good clinical outcomes at 90 days (OR=4.01, 95% CI: 2.60-6.19) and excellence clinical outcomes at 90 days (OR=5.70, 95% CI: 3.18-10.22) compared to SMT. Additionally, EVT showed a lower correlation with 90-day mortality rate compared to the SMT group (OR=0.35, 95% CI: 0.25-0.47). Subgroup analysis based on study type revealed that EVT had higher rates of successful reperfusion (retrospective study group: OR=7.97, 95% CI: 4.83-13.15; prospective study group: OR=51.57, 95% CI: 29.76-89.38) than the SMT group in both subgroups. The presence of sICH was not statistically significant in the retrospective study group (OR=1.20, 95% CI: 0.58-2.48) and showed high heterogeneity. However, in the prospective study group, EVT exhibited a higher risk of bleeding compared to SMT (OR=11.42, 95% CI: 2.65-49.20).

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, our real-world study aligns with the conclusions of recently published randomized controlled trials research. When comparing EVT and SMT in the treatment of BAO, EVT shows a higher correlation with favorable clinical outcomes, higher rates of successful reperfusion, and lower mortality rates. However, it does come with an increased risk of sICH.

Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment versus Standard Medical Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although endovascular treatment (EVT) is beneficial for large vessel occlusion in anterior circulation stroke, whether these benefits exist for basilar artery occlusion (BAO) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the outcomes of patients with BAO undergoing EVT and standard medical treatment (SMT).

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for eligible randomized control trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs involving patients with acute ischemic stroke and BAO undergoing EVT or SMT. The following outcomes were assessed: 90-day functional outcomes (favorable outcome and functional independence: modified Rankin scale [mRS] score of 0-3 or 0-2, respectively), mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) incidence. The summary effect sizes were determined as risk ratios (RRs) through the Mantel-Haenszel method with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Four RCTs and four non-RCTs were included. Compared with SMT, EVT resulted in a higher proportion of patients with 90-day mRS scores of 0-3 (RR: 1.54 [1.16-2.06] in RCTs and 1.88 [1.11-3.19] in non-RCTs), a higher proportion of patients achieving functional independence (90-day mRS score of 0-2; RR: 1.83 [1.07-3.12] and 1.84 [0.97-3.48], respectively), a lower risk of mortality (RR: 0.76 [0.65-0.89] and 0.72 [0.62-0.83], respectively), and a higher sICH risk (RR: 5.98 [2.11-16.97] and 4.95 [2.40-10.23], respectively). Severe neurological deficits, intravenous thrombolysis, and higher posterior circulation Acute Stroke Prognosis Early Computed Tomography Score (pc-ASPECTS) were associated with EVT benefits.

CONCLUSION

In patients with BAO, EVT results in superior functional outcomes, lower mortality risk, and higher sICH risk than does SMT, independent of age and sex. Higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, intravenous thrombolysis, and higher pc-ASPECTSs before treatment are associated with greater benefits from EVT.

Endovascular thrombectomy versus standard medical treatment for stroke patients with acute basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is superior to standard medical treatment (SMT) for stroke patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of EVT with SMT for treating BAO patients.

METHODS

Papers were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was favorable functional outcomes at 3 months (defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤3). A random effect model was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) per outcome.

RESULTS

Five articles, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and four observational cohort studies, comprising 1484 patients (1024 in the EVT group and 460 in the SMT group), were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated no significant differences between the EVT and SMT groups in achieving favorable functional outcomes at 3 months (RR=1.63, 95% CI 0.90, 2.96; p=0.11). However, patients in the EVT group had higher rates for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (RR=6.22, 95% CI 2.06 to 18.76; p=0.001) but lower mortality at 3 months (RR=0.72, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.91; p=0.007) than patients in the SMT group.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with BAO, EVT and SMT did not differ significantly in achieving favorable functional outcomes at 3 months, but BAO patients treated with EVT might have lower mortality at 3 months. RCTs are warranted to further assess the efficacy and safety of EVT for BAO patients.