1
|
Garcia A, Haleem A, Poe S, Gosh D, Christian Brown M, Herrmann BS, Lee DJ. Auditory Brainstem Implant Outcomes in Tumor and Nontumor Patients: A Systematic Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 170:1648-1658. [PMID: 38329219 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To elucidate the differences in auditory performance between auditory brainstem implant (ABI) patients with tumor or nontumor etiologies. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection from 1990 to 2021. REVIEW METHODS We included published studies with 5 or more pediatric or adult ABI users. Auditory outcomes and side effects were analyzed with weighted means for closed-set, open-set speech, and categories of auditory performance (CAP) scores. Overall performance was compared using an Adult Pediatric Ranked Order Speech Perception (APROSPER) scale created for this study. RESULTS Thirty-six studies were included and underwent full-text review. Data were extracted for 662 tumor and 267 nontumor patients. 83% were postlingually deafened and 17% were prelingually deafened. Studies that included tumor ABI patients had a weighted mean speech recognition of 39.2% (range: 19.6%-83.3%) for closed-set words, 23.4% (range: 17.2%-37.5%) for open-set words, 21.5% (range: 2.7%-48.4%) for open-set sentences, and 3.1 (range: 1.0-3.2) for CAP scores. Studies including nontumor ABI patients had a weighted mean speech recognition of 79.8% (range: 31.7%-84.4%) for closed-set words, 53.0% (range: 14.6%-72.5%) for open-set sentences, and 2.30 (range: 2.0-4.7) for CAP scores. Mean APROSPER results indicate better auditory performance among nontumor versus tumor patients (3.5 vs 3.0, P = .04). Differences in most common side effects were also observed between tumor and nontumor ABI patients. CONCLUSION Auditory performance is similar for tumor and nontumor patients for standardized auditory test scores. However, the APROSPER scale demonstrates better ABI performance for nontumor compared to tumor patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Garcia
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Eaton Peabody Laboratories (EPL), Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Afash Haleem
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Eaton Peabody Laboratories (EPL), Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sonja Poe
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Eaton Peabody Laboratories (EPL), Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Deborah Gosh
- Howe Library, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M Christian Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Eaton Peabody Laboratories (EPL), Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Barbara S Herrmann
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Eaton Peabody Laboratories (EPL), Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Audiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel J Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Eaton Peabody Laboratories (EPL), Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Veronese S, Cambiaghi M, Tommasi N, Sbarbati A, Galvin JJ. Ten-year follow-up of auditory brainstem implants: From intra-operative electrical auditory brainstem responses to perceptual results. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282261. [PMID: 36862753 PMCID: PMC9980821 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) can provide hearing sensation to individuals where the auditory nerve is damaged. However, patient outcomes with the ABI are typically much poorer than those for cochlear implant recipients. A major limitation to ABI outcomes is the number of implanted electrodes that can produce auditory responses to electric stimulation. One of the greatest challenges in ABI surgery is the intraoperative positioning of the electrode paddle, which must fit snugly within the cochlear nucleus complex. While there presently is no optimal procedure for intraoperative electrode positioning, intraoperative assessments may provide useful information regarding viable electrodes that may be included in patients' clinical speech processors. Currently, there is limited knowledge regarding the relationship between intraoperative data and post-operative outcomes. Furthermore, the relationship between initial ABI stimulation with and long-term perceptual outcomes is unknown. In this retrospective study, we reviewed intraoperative electrophysiological data from 24 ABI patients (16 adults and 8 children) obtained with two stimulation approaches that differed in terms of neural recruitment. The interoperative electrophysiological recordings were used to estimate the number of viable electrodes and were compared to the number of activated electrodes at initial clinical fitting. Regardless of the stimulation approach, the intraoperative estimate of viable electrodes greatly overestimated the number of active electrodes in the clinical map. The number of active electrodes was associated with long-term perceptual outcomes. Among patients with 10-year follow-up, at least 11/21 active electrodes were needed to support good word detection and closed-set recognition and 14/21 electrodes to support good open-set word and sentence recognition. Perceptual outcomes were better for children than for adults, despite a lower number of active electrodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila Veronese
- Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Verona University, Verona, Italy
- * E-mail:
| | - Marco Cambiaghi
- Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Verona University, Verona, Italy
| | - Nicola Tommasi
- Centre of Economic Documentation (CIDE), Verona University, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Sbarbati
- Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Verona University, Verona, Italy
| | - John J. Galvin
- House Institute Foundation, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hallin K, Rask-Andersen H. Auditory brainstem implant pitch discrimination and auditory outcome. ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA CASE REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/23772484.2022.2115915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Hallin
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Otorhinolaryngology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Helge Rask-Andersen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Otorhinolaryngology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bozsoy Mİ, Batuk MÖ, Çınar BÇ, Yaralı M, Sennaroğlu G, Sennaroğlu L. Evaluation of the non-auditory responses in individuals with auditory brainstem implant. Am J Otolaryngol 2022; 44:103679. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
|
5
|
Auditory Brainstem Implantation in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Experience From the Manchester Programme. Otol Neurotol 2017; 37:1267-74. [PMID: 27525707 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the experience of auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) in patients with Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case review. SETTING Tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS Implanted with a Cochlear ABI22 or ABI24M between 1994 and 2009 because of NF2 disease. INTERVENTION(S) Rehabilitative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Surgical complication rate; audiological outcomes. RESULTS There were 50 primary ABI insertions in 49 patients, including 16 inserted at the time of first side tumor removal as a sleeper, and two revision repositionings which failed to improve outcome. Postoperatively three patients had cerebrospinal fluid leaks which did not require reoperation, one patient had meningitis, and eleven patients suffered either temporary or permanent lower cranial nerve dysfunction. Twenty-nine patients became full time users; a further 12 patients became non-users. Three patients died while their device was inactive. Five patients retain serviceable contralateral hearing. Audiological open set testing of users showed means of: environmental sounds discrimination 51%; phoneme discrimination: with ABI alone 22%/lip reading (LR) 45%/ABI with LR 65%; sentence testing: with ABI alone 13%/LR 19%/ABI with LR 54%. CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients with NF2 implanted with an ABI find the device a useful aid to communication in conjunction with LR and in recognizing common environmental sounds. A small proportion gain open set discrimination. Almost a third of patients may end up as non-users. There is probably an increased risk of postoperative lower cranial nerve dysfunction so careful preoperative assessment is advised.
Collapse
|
6
|
Völker J, Kohm F, Jürgens L, Scherzad A, Schendzielorz P, Schraven SP, Mlynski R, Radeloff A, Hagen R, Rak K. Patterned semiconductor structures modulate neuronal outgrowth: Implication for the development of a neurobionic interface. J Biomed Mater Res A 2017; 106:65-72. [PMID: 28884492 DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2017] [Revised: 08/09/2017] [Accepted: 08/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Auditory implants stimulate the neurons by broad electrical fields, which leads to a low number of spectral channels. A reduction in the distance between the electrode and the neuronal structures might lead to better electrical transduction. The use of microstructured semiconductors offers a large number of contacts, which could attract neurons and stimulate them individually. To investigate the interaction between neurons and semiconductors, differentiated neuronal precursor cells were cultured on silicon wafers. Different structures were added on the wafers by electron beam lithography, and deep reactive ion etching in different depths (2 and 7 µm). Grooved surfaces guided the neurons and resulted in straight oriented axons, but neuronal outgrowth was impaired by the 7 µm grooves. Within the 7 µm structures, the neuronal cell body was totally encased and the nuclei were deformed from a round to an elliptical shape. On both square and cylindrical structures neuronal bridging could be detected in different forms, either between the tops of the structures or between the bottom and the top. Furthermore, neuronal bridges were established on the lateral part of the structures, and change in direction of neuronal growth was induced by the structure. Finally, it could be shown that neuronal growth cones were particularly attracted by the top of the cylinders, which might allow for the stimulation of neurons via this structure. In conclusion, study results indicate that structured semiconductors can modulate neuronal growth and its direction, offering a novel method for the development of new implants with improved neuronal stimulation. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 106A: 65-72, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Völker
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Kohm
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Lukas Jürgens
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Agmal Scherzad
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Philipp Schendzielorz
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian P Schraven
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Robert Mlynski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery "Otto Koerner", Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Andreas Radeloff
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Rudolf Hagen
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Kristen Rak
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lim HH, Lenarz T. Auditory midbrain implant: research and development towards a second clinical trial. Hear Res 2015; 322:212-23. [PMID: 25613994 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2014] [Revised: 12/04/2014] [Accepted: 01/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The cochlear implant is considered one of the most successful neural prostheses to date, which was made possible by visionaries who continued to develop the cochlear implant through multiple technological and clinical challenges. However, patients without a functional auditory nerve or implantable cochlea cannot benefit from a cochlear implant. The focus of the paper is to review the development and translation of a new type of central auditory prosthesis for this group of patients that is known as the auditory midbrain implant (AMI) and is designed for electrical stimulation within the inferior colliculus. The rationale and results for the first AMI clinical study using a multi-site single-shank array will be presented initially. Although the AMI has achieved encouraging results in terms of safety and improvements in lip-reading capabilities and environmental awareness, it has not yet provided sufficient speech perception. Animal and human data will then be presented to show that a two-shank AMI array can potentially improve hearing performance by targeting specific neurons of the inferior colliculus. A new two-shank array, stimulation strategy, and surgical approach are planned for the AMI that are expected to improve hearing performance in the patients who will be implanted in an upcoming clinical trial funded by the National Institutes of Health. Positive outcomes from this clinical trial will motivate new efforts and developments toward improving central auditory prostheses for those who cannot sufficiently benefit from cochlear implants. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled <Lasker Award>.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hubert H Lim
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Otolaryngology, and Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, 312 Church Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
| | - Thomas Lenarz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Matthies C, Brill S, Varallyay C, Solymosi L, Gelbrich G, Roosen K, Ernestus RI, Helms J, Hagen R, Mlynski R, Shehata-Dieler W, Müller J. Auditory brainstem implants in neurofibromatosis Type 2: is open speech perception feasible? J Neurosurg 2013; 120:546-58. [PMID: 24329026 DOI: 10.3171/2013.9.jns12686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT Patients with bilateral auditory nerve destruction may perceive some auditory input with auditory brainstem implants (ABIs). Despite technological developments and trials in new stimulation sites, hearing is very variable and of limited quality. The goal of this study was to identify advantageous and critical factors that influence the quality of auditory function, especially speech perception. METHODS The authors conducted a prospective study on ABI operations performed with the aid of multimodality neuromonitoring between 2005 and 2009 in 18 patients with neurofibromatosis Type 2. Outcome was evaluated by testing word recognition (monotrochee-polysyllabic word test at auditory-only mode [MTPa]) and open speech perception (Hochmair-Schulz-Moser [HSM] sentence test), both in pure auditory mode. The primary outcome was the HSM score at 24 months. The predictive meaning of general clinical data, tumor volume, number of active electrodes, duration of deafness, and early hearing data was examined. RESULTS In 16 successful ABI activations the average score for MTPa was 89% (SD 13%), and for HSM it was 41% (SD 32%) at 24 months. There were 2 nonresponders, 1 after radiosurgery and the other in an anatomical variant. Direct facial nerve reconstruction during the same surgery was followed by successful nerve recovery in 2 patients, with a simultaneous very good HSM result. Patients' age, tumor extension, and tumor volume were not negative predictors. There was an inverse relationship between HSM scores and deafness duration; 50% or higher HSM scores were found only in patients with ipsilateral deafness duration up to 24 months. The higher the deafness sum of both sides, the less likely that any HSM score will be achieved (p = 0.034). In patients with total deafness duration of less than 240 months, higher numbers of active electrodes were significantly associated with better outcomes. The strongest cross-correlation was identified between early MTPa score at 3 months and 24-month HSM outcome. CONCLUSIONS This study documents that open-set speech recognition in pure auditory mode is feasible in patients with ABIs. Large tumor volumes do not prevent good outcome. Positive preconditions are short ipsilateral and short bilateral deafness periods and high number of auditory electrodes. Early ability in pure auditory word recognition tests indicates long-term capability of open speech perception.
Collapse
|
9
|
Allitt BJ, Benjaminsen C, Morgan SJ, Paolini AG. Intralaminar stimulation of the inferior colliculus facilitates frequency-specific activation in the auditory cortex. J Neural Eng 2013; 10:046008. [DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/4/046008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
10
|
Matthies C, Brill S, Kaga K, Morita A, Kumakawa K, Skarzynski H, Claassen A, Hui Y, Chiong C, Müller J, Behr R. Auditory Brainstem Implantation Improves Speech Recognition in Neurofibromatosis Type II Patients. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 75:282-95. [DOI: 10.1159/000350568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2012] [Accepted: 10/22/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
11
|
Electrophysiological mapping of the cochlear nucleus with multi-channel bipolar surface microelectrodes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 270:869-74. [PMID: 22692697 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-2077-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2012] [Accepted: 05/31/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Auditory potentials in response to electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus were recorded in guinea pigs using two types of multi-channel surface microelectrodes with inter-electrode distance of 100 and 200 μm. Unequivocal waves of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs), which increased in amplitude with increasing stimulation current, were consistently observed. Electrophysiological mapping with these multichannel electrodes could clearly distinguish stimulation points showing positive EABRs from points showing undetectable EABRs, indicating that multi-channel surface microelectrodes have great potential in clinical use to determine the optimal location for the positioning of auditory brainstem implants, and may allow more precise discrimination of pitch. Further study to clarify the optimal inter-electrode distance for humans is necessary before application to physiological mapping in the human cochlear nucleus.
Collapse
|
12
|
Rak K, Wasielewski N, Radeloff A, Scherzed A, Jablonka S, Hagen R, Mlynski R. Growth behavior of cochlear nucleus neuronal cells on semiconductor substrates. J Biomed Mater Res A 2011; 97:158-66. [PMID: 21370446 DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.33042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2010] [Revised: 10/11/2010] [Accepted: 12/17/2010] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Auditory brainstem implants provide sound information by direct stimulation of the cochlear nucleus to patients with dysfunctional or absent cranial nerve VIII. In contrast to patients with cochlear implants, the use of the auditory brainstem implants is less successful. This cannot be fully explained by the difference location of stimulation but a rather unspecific neuronal stimulation. The aim of this study was to further examine neuronal cells of the cochlear nucleus and to test their interactions with semiconductor substrates as a potential electrode material for improved auditory brainstem implants. The cochlear nuclei of postnatal day 7 rats were microsurgically dissected. The tissue was dissociated enzymatically and plated on coverslips as control and on the semiconductor substrates silicon or silicon nitride. After 4 days in culture the morphology and growth of dissociated cells was determined by fluorescence and scanning electron microscopy. Dissociated cells of the cochlear nucleus showed reduced cell growth on semiconductor substrates compared with controls. SEM analysis demonstrated close contact of neurons with supporting cells in culture and good adherence of neuronal growth cones on the used materials. These findings present basic knowledge for the development of neuron-electrode interfaces for future auditory brainstem implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Rak
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Comprehensive Hearing Center, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shivdasani MN, Mauger SJ, Argent RE, Rathbone GD, Paolini AG. Inferior colliculus responses to dual-site intralamina stimulation in the ventral cochlear nucleus. J Comp Neurol 2010; 518:4226-42. [PMID: 20878785 DOI: 10.1002/cne.22450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
A major limitation of the present auditory brainstem implant (ABI) is its inability to access the tonotopic organization of the ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN). A previous study by our group indicated that stimulation of single sites within a given VCN frequency region did not always elicit frequency-specific responses within the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (CIC) and in some cases did not elicit a response at all. For this study, we hypothesized that sequential stimulation (with a short interpulse delay of 320 μsec) of two VCN sites in similar frequency regions would enhance responsiveness in CIC neurons. Multiunit neural recordings in response to pure tones were obtained at 58 VCN and 164 CIC sites in anesthetized rats. Among the 58 VCN sites, 39 pairs of sites with similar characteristic frequencies were chosen for electrical stimulation. Each member of a VCN pair was electrically stimulated individually, followed by sequential stimulation of the pair, while recording CIC responses. On average, CIC sites were found to respond to dual-site VCN stimulation with significantly lower thresholds, wider dynamic ranges, a greater extent of activation with increasing current levels, and a higher degree of frequency specificity compared with single-site stimulation. Although these effects were positive for the most part, in some cases dual-site stimulation resulted in increased CIC thresholds and decreased dynamic ranges, extent of activation, and frequency specificity. The results suggest that multisite stimulation within VCN isofrequency laminae using penetrating electrodes could significantly improve ABI stimulation strategies and implant performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohit N Shivdasani
- School of Psychological Science, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vince GH, Herbold C, Coburger J, Westermaier T, Drenckhahn D, Schuetz A, Kunze E, Solymosi L, Roosen K, Matthies C. An anatomical assessment of the supracerebellar midline and paramedian approaches to the inferior colliculus for auditory midbrain implants using a neuronavigation model on cadaveric specimens. J Clin Neurosci 2009; 17:107-12. [PMID: 20004580 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.06.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2009] [Accepted: 06/29/2009] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The inferior colliculus (IC) is an alternative site for electrode placement in neural deafness due to its surgical accessibility and its well-known tonotopic stratification. In patients where tumor surgery has already occurred and the cerebellopontine angle contains scar tissue or tumor-remnants, midline and paramedian supracerebellar approaches are alternative routes. They are often avoided due to concerns regarding the venous drainage of the cerebellum, the electrode trajectory and the course of the electrode cable. We studied these surgical routes in five neuronavigated fixed cadaveric specimens. For paramedian and midline approaches, the transverse sinus was exposed 5.8mm on average. A mean of 1.6 cerebellar veins, with an average diameter of 2.0mm, draining to the tentorium were transected to reach the tentorial notch. Only 0.4 arterial branches were met. We conclude that the supracerebellar midline and paramedian approaches provide a good exposure of the IC and offer safe and viable alternative routes to the IC. Additionally, they provide a wider angle of action for optimal electrode placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giles H Vince
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str 11, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhang J, Zhang X. Electrical stimulation of the dorsal cochlear nucleus induces hearing in rats. Brain Res 2009; 1311:37-50. [PMID: 19941837 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2009] [Revised: 11/11/2009] [Accepted: 11/12/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) restore hearing by electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus (CN). Depending on the physiological condition, duration of the pre-existing deafness, extent of damage to the CN, and the number of channels accessible to the tonotopic frequency gradients of the CN, ABIs improve speech understanding to varying degrees. Although the ventral cochlear nucleus, a mainstream auditory structure, has been considered a logic target for ABI stimulation, it is not yet clear how the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) contributes to patients' hearing during ABI stimulation. To better understand the mechanisms underlying ABIs, we tested if electrical stimulation of the rat DCN induces hearing using a novel electrical prepulse inhibition (ePPI) of startle reflex behavior model. Our results showed that bipolar electrical stimulation of all channels in the DCN induced behavioral manifestation of hearing and that electrical stimulation of certain channels in the DCN induced robust neural activity in auditory cortex channels that responded to acoustic stimulation and demonstrated well-defined frequency tuning curves. This suggests that the DCN plays an important role in electrical hearing and should be further pursued in designing new ABIs. The novel ePPI behavioral paradigm may potentially be developed into an efficient method for testing hearing in animals with an implantable prosthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinsheng Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 5E-UHC, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 4201 Saint Antoine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
The auditory midbrain implant (AMI) is a new hearing prosthesis designed for stimulation of the inferior colliculus in deaf patients who cannot sufficiently benefit from cochlear implants. The authors have begun clinical trials in which five patients have been implanted with a single shank AMI array (20 electrodes). The goal of this review is to summarize the development and research that has led to the translation of the AMI from a concept into the first patients. This study presents the rationale and design concept for the AMI as well a summary of the animal safety and feasibility studies that were required for clinical approval. The authors also present the initial surgical, psychophysical, and speech results from the first three implanted patients. Overall, the results have been encouraging in terms of the safety and functionality of the implant. All patients obtain improvements in hearing capabilities on a daily basis. However, performance varies dramatically across patients depending on the implant location within the midbrain with the best performer still not able to achieve open set speech perception without lip-reading cues. Stimulation of the auditory midbrain provides a wide range of level, spectral, and temporal cues, all of which are important for speech understanding, but they do not appear to sufficiently fuse together to enable open set speech perception with the currently used stimulation strategies. Finally, several issues and hypotheses for why current patients obtain limited speech perception along with several feasible solutions for improving AMI implementation are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hubert H Lim
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The penetrating electrode auditory brainstem implant (PABI) is an extension of auditory brainstem implant (ABI) technology originally developed for individuals deafened by neurofibromatosis type 2. Whereas the conventional ABI uses surface electrodes on the cochlear nuclei, the PABI uses 8 or 10 penetrating microelectrodes in conjunction with a separate array of 10 or 12 surface electrodes. The goals of the PABI were to use microstimulation to reduce threshold current levels, increase the range of pitch percepts, and improve electrode selectivity and speech recognition. PATIENTS AND PROTOCOL: In a prospective clinical trial, 10 individuals, all with neurofibromatosis type 2, received a PABI after vestibular schwannoma removal via a translabyrinthine approach. All study participants met strict requirements for informed consent as part of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. Approximately 8 weeks after implantation, PABI devices were activated and tested at our tertiary clinical and research facility. Mean follow-up time was 33.8 months. STUDY DESIGN Using a single-subject design, we measured thresholds and dynamic ranges, electrode-specific pitch percepts, and speech perception performance at regular intervals. RESULTS Penetrating electrodes produced auditory thresholds at substantially lower charge levels than surface electrodes, a wide range of electrode-specific pitch sensations, and minimal cross-electrode interference and could be used in speech maps either alone or in combination with surface electrodes. However, less than 25% of penetrating electrodes resulted in auditory sensations, whereas more than 60% of surface electrodes were effective. Even after more than 3 years of experience, patients using penetrating electrodes did not achieve improved speech recognition compared with those using surface electrode ABIs. In patients with usable penetrating electrodes, City University of New York Sentence Test scores with sound and visual information were 61.6% in the PABI group and 64.7% in a surface ABI cohort (p = not significant). CONCLUSION The PABI met the goals of lower threshold, increased pitch range, and high selectivity, but these properties did not result in improved speech recognition.
Collapse
|
18
|
Auditory Brainstem Implant in Neurofibromatosis Type 2 and Non-Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Patients. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29:1140-6. [PMID: 18849886 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e31818b6238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
19
|
Gharabaghi A, Löwenheim H, Heckl S, Koerbel A, Kaminsky J, Tatagiba M. AUDITORY REHABILITATION AFTER LONG-TERM DEAFNESS. Neurosurgery 2008; 62:983-5; discussion 985-6. [DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000318191.63901.2b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The duration of preexisting profound deafness in patients with bilateral retrocochlear lesions is known to correlate negatively to the extent of auditory restoration after auditory brainstem implantation. There is, therefore, a lack of information regarding the potential of the central auditory system to mediate hearing perception after long-term deafness.
METHODS
The authors evaluated auditory perception in a case of auditory brainstem implantation after 35 years of deafness.
RESULTS
Electrically evoked auditory brainstem potentials could be elicited by both stimulus polarities and were consistent with auditory brainstem origin. Discrimination between temporal and spectral patterns in speech could be achieved. This permitted us to distinguish various voice qualities, especially of familiar speakers in quiet surroundings.
CONCLUSION
The potential of the deafferentiated central auditory system to mediate auditory brainstem implant-induced hearing perception even after very long-term deafness has been demonstrated. Those patients with complete dysfunction of Cranial Nerve VIII for a long period may be considered as candidates for auditory brainstem implantation in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Gharabaghi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hubert Löwenheim
- Department of Otorhinolarhangology, Eberhard Karls University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stefan Heckl
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andrei Koerbel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jan Kaminsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marcos Tatagiba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Stasiunas A, Verikas A, Miliauskas R, Stasiuniene N, Bacauskiene M. Physiologically inspired signal preprocessing for auditory prostheses: Insights from the electro-motility of the OHC. Med Eng Phys 2008; 30:171-81. [PMID: 17448719 DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2006] [Revised: 11/30/2006] [Accepted: 03/02/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
We designed a non-linear functional model of the outer hair cell (OHC) functioning in the filtering system of the cochlea and then isolated from it two second-order structures, one employing the mechanism of the somatic motility and the other the hair bundle motion of the OHC. The investigation of these circuits showed that the main mechanism increasing the sensitivity and frequency selectivity of the filtering system is the somatic motility. The mechanism of the active hair bundle motion appeared less suitable for realization of the band-pass filtering structures due to the dependence of the sensitivity, natural frequency and selectivity on the signal intensity. We combined three second-order filtering structures employing the mechanism of the somatic motility and the lateral inhibition to form a parallel-type filtering channel of the sixth order with the frequency characteristics of the Butterworth-type and Gaussian-type. The investigation of these channels showed that the Gaussian-type channel has the advantage over the Butterworth-type channel. It is more suitable for realization of a filter bank with common lateral circuits and has less distorted frequency characteristic in the nonlinear mode.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antanas Stasiunas
- Department of Applied Electronics, Kaunas University of Technology, LT-51368 Kaunas, Lithuania
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Persons who lack an auditory nerve cannot benefit from cochlear implants, but a prosthesis utilizing an electrode array implanted on the surface of the cochlear nucleus can restore some hearing. Worldwide, more than 500 persons have received these "auditory brainstem implants," most commonly after removal of the tumors that occur with Type 2 Neurofibromatosis (NF2). Typically, the ABIs provide these individuals with improved speech perception when combined with lip-reading and useful perception of environmental sounds, but little open-set speech recognition. The feasibility of supplementing the array of surface electrodes with penetrating microstimulating electrodes has been investigated in animal studies, and 10 persons with NF2 have received implants that include a surface array and an array of penetrating microelectrodes. Their speech perception is not significantly better than that of the NF2 patients who have only the surface arrays, but the findings do validate the concept of intranuclear stimulation and suggest how such prostheses might be improved by modifying the microstimulating array and also by optimizing the sound processing strategies. Recent publications have described ABI patients with deafness of etiologies other than NF2 who have achieved open-set speech recognition. This suggests that the cochlear nuclei of the NF2 patients are damaged by the disease process or during surgical removal of the tumor.
Collapse
|
22
|
Kuchta J. Twenty-five years of auditory brainstem implants: perspectives. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA. SUPPLEMENT 2007; 97:443-9. [PMID: 17691334 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-33081-4_51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) provides auditory sensations, recognition of environmental sounds and aid in spoken communication in more than 300 patients worldwide. It is no more a device under investigation but it is widely accepted for the treatment of patients who have lost hearing due to bilateral tumors of the vestibulocochlear nerve. Most of these patients are completely deaf when the implant is switched off. In contrast to the cochlear implants (CI), only few of the implanted patients achieve open-set speech recognition without the help of visual cues. In the last few years, patients with lesions other than tumors have also been implanted. Auditory perceptual performance in patients who are deaf due to trauma, cochlea aplasia or other non-tumor lesions of the cochlea or the vestibulocochlear nerve turned out to be much better than in NF2 tumor patients. Until recently, the target region for ABI implantation has been the ventral cochlear nucleus (CN). The electrodes are implanted via the translabyrinthine or retrosigmoid approach. Currently, new targets along the central auditory pathways and new, minimally invasive techniques for implantation are under investigation. These techniques may further improve auditory perceptual performance in ABI patients and provide hearing to a variety of types of central deafness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kuchta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cologne University Hospital, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Shivdasani MN, Mauger SJ, Rathbone GD, Paolini AG. Inferior colliculus responses to multichannel microstimulation of the ventral cochlear nucleus: implications for auditory brain stem implants. J Neurophysiol 2007; 99:1-13. [PMID: 17928560 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00629.2007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Multichannel techniques were used to assess the frequency specificity of activation in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (CIC) produced by electrical stimulation of localized regions within the ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN). Data were recorded in response to pure tones from 141 and 193 multiunit clusters in the rat VCN and the CIC, respectively. Of 141 VCN sites, 126 were individually stimulated while recording responses in the CIC. A variety of CIC response types were seen with an increase in both electrical and acoustic stimulation levels. The majority of sites exhibited monotonic rate-level types acoustically, whereas spike rate saturation was achieved predominantly with electrical stimulation. In 20.6% of the 364 characteristic frequency aligned VCN-CIC pairs, the CIC sites did not respond to stimulation. In 26% of the 193 CIC sites, a high correlation was observed between acoustic tuning and electrical tuning obtained through VCN stimulation. A high degree of frequency specificity was found in 58% of the 118 lowest threshold VCN-CIC pairs. This was dependent on electrode placement within the VCN because a higher degree of frequency specificity was achieved with stimulation of medial, central, and posterolateral VCN regions than more anterolateral regions. Broadness of acoustic tuning in the CIC played a role in frequency-specific activation. Narrowly tuned CIC sites showed the lowest degree of frequency specificity on stimulation of the anterolateral VCN regions. These data provide significant implications for auditory brain stem implant electrode placement, current localization, power requirements, and facilitation of information transfer to higher brain centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohit N Shivdasani
- The Bionic Ear Institute, East Melbourne Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
McCreery D, Lossinsky A, Pikov V. Performance of multisite silicon microprobes implanted chronically in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the cat. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007; 54:1042-52. [PMID: 17554823 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2007.891167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
A central auditory prosthesis based on microstimulation within the ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN) offers a means of restoring hearing to persons whose auditory nerve has been destroyed bilaterally and cannot benefit from cochlear implants. Arrays of silicon probes with 16 stimulating sites were implanted into the VCN of adult cats, for up to 314 days. Compound neuronal responses evoked from the sites in the VCN were recorded periodically in the central nucleus of the contralateral inferior colliculus (ICC). The threshold and growth of most of the responses were stable for at least 250 days after implantation of the arrays. The responses evoked from the deepest and shallowest electrode sites did exhibit some changes over time but none of the thresholds exceeded 10 microA. The thresholds and growth of the compound responses from most of the stimulating sites were very stable over time, and comparable to those of chronically implanted single-site iridium microelectrodes. Multiunit neuronal activity evoked from the stimulating sites in the VCN was recorded along the dorsolateral-ventromedial (DLVM) axis of the ICC. The distribution, span and degree of overlap of the multiunit activity demonstrated the utility of the multisite, multishank array configuration as a means of accessing the neuronal populations in the VCN that encode various acoustic frequencies. These findings are encouraging for the prospects of developing an auditory prosthesis employing multi-site silicon microprobes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas McCreery
- Huntington Medical Research Institutes, Neural Engineering Program, 734 Fairmount Ave., Pasadena, CA 91105, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bouccara D, Kalamarides M, Bozorg Grayeli A, Ambert-Dahan E, Rey A, Sterkers O. Implant auditif du tronc cérébral: indications et résultats. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 124:148-54. [PMID: 17320034 DOI: 10.1016/j.aorl.2006.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2006] [Accepted: 10/12/2006] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To summarize the indications and evaluate the Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) performances in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and other otologics indications, as postmeningitis ossified cochlea. MATERIAL AND METHODS Main and first indication of ABI is NF2. Emergent indications are bilateral total ossified cochlea, vestibular schwannoma with controlateral lesions, cochlear nerve aplasia or inner ear's malformations. The pre-operative evaluation includes clinical, radiological, lipreading, and psychological status. A translabyrinthine or retrosigmoid approach is performed, depending on tumoral or not tumoral status. The auditory perception with the ABI is evaluated by testing, the words recognition in open-set lists, and the speech understanding with usual sentences. RESULTS In NF2 patients, best results are obtained in cases of smaller vestibular schwannoma and none, or short term, auditory deprivation. Negative prognostic factors are duration of total hearing loss (>10 years), tumor size (>30 mm), difficulties in electrode array placement, complications during post-operative course and number of active electrodes (<10). In cases of postmeningitis total deafness with totally ossified cochlea, results demonstrate a good benefit reaching these obtained with cochlear implant in post-meningitis deafness. CONCLUSION These results show a clear benefit of ABI in NF2 patients, with or without previous tumor removal, in case of small tumor with a short duration of hearing loss. In case of postmeningitis ossified cochlea, results potentially reach those of cochlear implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Bouccara
- Service d'ORL, APHP, hôpital Beaujon, université Paris-VII, 100 boulevard du Général-Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cervera-Paz FJ, Saldaña E, Manrique M. A Model for Auditory Brain Stem Implants: Bilateral Surgical Deafferentation of the Cochlear Nuclei in the Macaque Monkey. Ear Hear 2007; 28:424-33. [PMID: 17485991 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e31804793d9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with extensive bilateral lesions of the auditory nerve have a profound and irreversible sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), which can only be overcome with individually-fitted auditory brain stem implants that directly stimulate the cochlear nuclei. Despite the enormous potential of this increasingly applied treatment, the auditory performance of many implanted patients is limited, and the variability between cases hinders a complete understanding of the role played by the multiple parameters related to the efficacy of the implant. OBJECTIVES To mimic the condition of patients who have bilateral lesions of the auditory nerve, we developed an experimental model of bilateral deafferentation of the cochlear nuclei by surgical transection of the cochlear nerves of adult primates. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed bilateral transection of the cochlear nerves of six adult, healthy, male captive-bred macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Before surgery, brain stem auditory evoked potentials were recorded. The histological material obtained from these animals was compared with similarly processed sections from seven macaques with intact cochlear nerves. The surgical technique, similar to that used in human neuro-otology, combined a labyrinthectomy and a neurectomy of the cochlear nerves, and caused deafness. We analyzed immunocytochemically the expression in cochlear nerve fibers of neurofilaments (SMI-32), and cytosolic calcium binding proteins calretinin, parvalbumin and calbindin, and also applied a histochemical reaction for acetylcholinesterase. RESULTS None of the primates had any major complications due to the surgical procedure. The lesions produced massive anterograde degeneration of the cochlear nerves, evidenced by marked gliosis and by loss of both type I fibers (which in this species are immunoreactive for calretinin, parvalbumin and neurofilaments) and type II fibers (which are acetylcholinesterase positive). The model of surgical transection described herein causes extensive damage to the cochlear nerves while leaving the cochlea intact, thus mimicking the condition of patients with profound SNHL due to bilateral cochlear nerve degeneration. CONCLUSIONS The phylogenetic proximity of primates to humans, and the paramount advantage of close anatomical and physiological similarities, allowed us to use the same surgical technique applied to human patients, and to perform a thorough evaluation of the consequences of neurectomy. Thus, bilateral surgical deafferentation of the macaque cochlear nuclei may constitute an advantageous model for study of auditory brain stem implants.
Collapse
|
27
|
Long CJ, Nimmo-Smith I, Baguley DM, O'Driscoll M, Ramsden R, Otto SR, Axon PR, Carlyon RP. Optimizing the clinical fit of auditory brain stem implants. Ear Hear 2005; 26:251-62. [PMID: 15937407 DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200506000-00002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop and implement a new audiological fitting procedure for auditory brain stem implants (ABIs), based on an efficient algorithm, and to compare it with two procedures presently used in clinical practice. DESIGN First, the different procedures were compared by using computer models and simulations with normal-hearing subjects (N = 4). This allows for an analysis of the accuracy of the procedures in a way that is not possible when testing ABI users. The root-mean-square error between the order estimated by the procedure and the true order was calculated. In addition, ABI users (N = 2) were tested with the new procedure to see if it could be successfully applied in clinic. The degree of variability of their results across runs and sessions was analyzed. RESULTS The tests of the normal-hearing subjects showed that our proposed procedure required significantly fewer trials (22 on average) than procedures presently used in clinic (with 76 and 234 trials on average for the two other procedures tested) to produce the same degree of accuracy. Computer modeling also demonstrated this advantage. Additional testing showed this advantage was maintained under a variety of conditions relevant to the clinic. The two patients tested were able to use this procedure with success, even though they were poor at discriminating the pitch of electrodes. The patients showed results consistent with having about 4 to 5 discriminable groups of electrodes with the 12 to 14 electrodes tested. CONCLUSIONS The proposed procedure requires fewer trials to produce a clinically useful result and is well tolerated in the clinic. An additional advantage is that it allows testing to be broken down into several "blocks," each containing a small number of trials. If the variability between blocks is small, information can be combined across blocks to increase the accuracy of the result. If the variability is large, perhaps between blocks on different days, this may reflect a significant change in the percepts generated by the implant, and signal to the clinician that a significant alteration in the fitting is required. We recommend its use in ABI user fitting and in cochlear implant fitting when pitch ranking is problematic.
Collapse
|
28
|
Tatagiba M, Gharabaghi A. Electrically evoked hearing perception by functional neurostimulation of the central auditory system. RE-ENGINEERING OF THE DAMAGED BRAIN AND SPINAL CORD 2005; 93:93-5. [PMID: 15986735 DOI: 10.1007/3-211-27577-0_15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Perceptional benefits and potential risks of electrical stimulation of the central auditory system are constantly changing due to ongoing developments and technical modifications. Therefore, we would like to introduce current treatment protocols and strategies that might have an impact on functional results of auditory brainstem implants (ABI) in profoundly deaf patients. Patients with bilateral tumours as a result of neurofibromatosis type 2 with complete dysfunction of the eighth cranial nerves are the most frequent candidates for auditory brainstem implants. Worldwide, about 300 patients have already received an ABI through a translabyrinthine or suboccipital approach supported by multimodality electrophysiological monitoring. Patient selection is based on disease course, clinical signs, audiological, radiological and psycho-social criteria. The ABI provides the patients with access to auditory information such as environmental sound awareness together with distinct hearing cues in speech. In addition, this device markedly improves speech reception in combination with lip-reading. Nonetheless, there is only limited open-set speech understanding. Results of hearing function are correlated with electrode design, number of activated electrodes, speech processing strategies, duration of pre-existing deafness and extent of brainstem deformation. Functional neurostimulation of the central auditory system by a brainstem implant is a safe and beneficial procedure, which may considerably improve the quality of life in patients suffering from deafness due to bilateral retrocochlear lesions. The auditory outcome may be improved by a new generation of microelectrodes capable of penetrating the surface of the brainstem to access more directly the auditory neurons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Tatagiba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kuchta J. Neuroprosthetic Hearing with Auditory Brainstem Implants / Wiederherstellung des Hörens durch auditorische Hirnstammimplantate. BIOMED ENG-BIOMED TE 2004; 49:83-7. [PMID: 15171587 DOI: 10.1515/bmt.2004.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) does provide auditory sensations, recognition of environmental sounds and aid in spoken communication in about 300 patients worldwide. It is no more an investigative device but widely accepted for the treatment of patients who have lost hearing due to bilateral tumors of the hearing nerve who transmits the acoustic information from the cochlea to the brain. Most of the implanted patients are completely deaf when the implant is switched off. In contrast to cochlear implants, only few of the implanted patients achieve open-set speech recognition without the help of visual cues. On average, the ABI improves communicative functions like speech recognition at about 30% when compared to lip-reading only. The task for the next years is to improve the outcome of ABI further by developing new less invasive operative approaches as well as new hardware and software for the ABI device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kuchta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cologne University Hospital, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|