Microsurgical posterior foraminotomy with laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic radiculomyelopathy including cervical spondylotic amyotrophy

Cervical Radiculopathy: Focus on Factors for Better Surgical Outcomes and Operative Techniques

For patients with cervical radiculopathy, most studies have recommended conservative treatment as the first-line treatment; however, when conventional treatment fails, surgery is considered. A better understanding of the prognosis of cervical radiculopathy is essential to provide accurate information to the patients. If the patients complain of persistent and recurrent arm pain/numbness not respond to conservative treatment, or exhibit neurologic deficits, surgery is performed using anterior or posterior approaches. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has historically been widely used and has proven to be safe and effective. To improve surgical outcomes of ACDF surgery, many studies have been conducted on types of spacers, size/height/position of cages, anterior plating, patients' factors, surgical techniques, and so forth. Cervical disc replacement (CDR) is designed to reduce the incidence of adjacent segment disease during long-term follow-up by maintaining cervical spine motion postoperatively. Many studies on excellent indications for the CDR, proper type/size/shape/height of the implants, and surgical techniques were performed. Posterior cervical foraminotomy is a safe and effective surgical option to avoid complications associated with anterior approach and fusion surgery. Most recent literature demonstrated that all three surgical techniques for patients with cervical radiculopathy have clear advantages and disadvantages and reveal satisfactory surgical outcomes under a proper selection of patients and application of appropriate surgical methods. For this, it is important to fully understand the factors for better surgical outcomes and to adequately practice the operative techniques for patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA) is characterized by upper limb muscle weakness and atrophy, without sensory deficits. The pathophysiology of CSA has been attributed to selective injury to the ventral nerve root and/or anterior horn of the spinal cord. This review aimed to delineate the history of CSA and to describe the epidemiology, etiology, pathophysiology, classification, clinical features, radiological and electrophysiological assessment, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, natural history and treatment of CSA.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Web of Science databases was conducted, from their inception to April 3, 2018.

RESULTS

Clinically, CSA is classified into three types: a proximal-type (involving the scapular muscles, deltoid and biceps), a distal-type (involving the triceps and muscles of the forearm and hand) and a diffuse-type (involving features of both the distal- and proximal-type). Diagnosis requires documentation of muscle atrophy, without significant sensory deficits, supported by careful neurological, radiological and neurophysiological assessments, with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parsonage-Turner syndrome, rotator cuff tear and Hirayama disease being the principle differential diagnoses. Conservative management of CSA includes cervical traction, neck immobilization and physical therapy, with vitamin B12 or E administration being useful in some patients. Surgical treatment, including anterior decompression and fusion or laminoplasty, with or without foraminotomy, is indicated after conservative treatment failure. Factors associated with a poor outcome include the distal-type CSA, long symptom duration, older age and greater preoperative muscle weakness.

CONCLUSION

Although the disease process of CSA is self-limited, treatment remains challenging, leaving scope for future studies. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Limiting fusion levels by combining anterior cervical decompression and fusion with posterior laminectomy: Technical note

BACKGROUND

Authors aim to report on the outcomes of combining selective anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) with laminectomy in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculomyelopathy (CSR).

METHODS

10 patients with ACDF and posterior laminectomy reviewed.

RESULTS

60% female population, mean age 61 ± 3 years, mean BMI 24.7 ± 3.4 kg/m2. VAS and NDI showed significant improvement, p < 0.001, p = 0.02 respectively. Mean PCS 31.9 ± 2.7, MCS 38.9 ± 3.4 improved to mean PCS 42.2 ± 5.1, MCS 51.0 ± 4.7, p = 0.09 and 0.06 respectively. At final follow up fusion rate was 90% and all patients had Nurick Grade 0.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, procedure shown to be safe with improved symptoms.

Multilevel posterior foraminotomy with laminoplasty versus laminoplasty alone for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with radiculopathy: a comparative study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Conventional laminoplasty is useful for expanding a stenotic spinal canal. However, it has limited use for the decompression of accompanying neural foraminal stenosis. As such, an additional posterior foraminotomy could be simultaneously applied, although this procedure carries a risk of segmental kyphosis and instability.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to elucidate the long-term surgical outcomes of additional posterior foraminotomy with laminoplasty (LF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) with radiculopathy.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective comparative study was carried out.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Ninety-eight consecutive patients who underwent laminoplasty for CSM with radiculopathy between January 2006 and December 2012 were screened for eligibility. This study included 66 patients, who were treated with a laminoplasty of two or more levels and followed up for more than 2 years after surgery.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, JOA recovery rates, and visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. The C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis distance, cervical lordosis, range of motion (ROM), and angulation and vertebral slippage at the foraminotomy level were used to measure radiological outcomes using the whole spine anterioposterior or lateral and dynamic lateral radiographs.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients with CSM with radiculopathy involving two or more levels were consecutively treated with laminoplasty and followed up for more than 2 years after surgery. The first 26 patients underwent laminoplasty alone (LA group), whereas the next 40 patients underwent an additional posterior foraminotomy at stenotic neural foramens with radiating symptoms in addition to laminoplasty (LF group). In the LF group, the foraminotomy with less resection than 50% of facet joint to avoid segmental kyphosis and instability was performed at 78 segments (unilateral-to-bilateral ratio=57:21) and 99 sites. Clinical and radiographic data were assessed preoperatively and at 2-year follow-up and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The NDI, JOA scores, JOA recovery rates, and VAS for neck and arm pain were improved significantly in both groups after surgery. The improvement in the VAS for arm pain was significantly greater in the LF group (from 5.55±2.52 to 1.85±2.39) than the LA group (from 5.48±2.42 to 3.40±2.68) (p<.001). Although cervical lordosis and ROM decreased postoperatively in both groups, there were no significant differences in the degree of reduction between the LF and LA groups. Although the postoperative focal angulation and slippage were slightly increased in the LF group, this was not to a significant degree. Furthermore, segmental kyphosis and instability were not observed in the LF group, regardless of whether the patient underwent a unilateral or bilateral foraminotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional posterior foraminotomy with laminoplasty is likely to improve arm pain more significantly than laminoplasty alone by decompressing nerve roots. Also, performing posterior foraminotomy via multiple levels or bilaterally did not significantly affect segmental malalignment and instability. Therefore, when a laminoplasty is performed for CSM with radiculopathy, an additional posterior foraminotomy could be an efficient and safe treatment that improves both myelopathy symptoms and radicular arm pain.

Predisposing factors for poor outcome of surgery for cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a multivariate analysis

The purpose of this study was to characterize risk factors for poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA). We retrospectively reviewed 88 cases of CSA surgery and investigated age, sex, duration of symptoms, atrophy type, preoperative muscle power, signal changes on MRI, anterior horn (AH) or ventral nerve root (VNR) compression, compression levels, surgical approach and postoperative recovery. Fifty (56.8%) patients had good surgical outcome. Logistic regression, with poor outcome as dependent variable, showed independent risks associated with duration of symptoms (OR; 1 for symptom duration less than 3 months versus 3.961 [95% CI; 1.203–13.039, p = 0.024] for symptom duration of 3–6 months versus 18.724 [95% CI; 3.967–88.367, p < 0.001] for symptom duration greater than 6 months), compression type (OR; 1 for VNR versus 4.931 [95% CI; 1.457–16.685, p = 0.010] for AH versus 5.538 [95% CI; 1.170–26.218, p = 0.031] for VNR + AH), and atrophy type (OR; 1 for proximal type versus 6.456 [95% CI; 1.938–21.508, p = 0.002] for distal type). These findings suggest that a long duration of symptoms, AH or both AH and VNR compression, and distal type are risk factors for poor surgical outcome in patients with CSA.

Expansion Open-door Laminoplasty With Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Coexisting Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy and Unilateral Radiculopathy

STUDY DESIGN

This was a clinical prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether clinical and radiologic outcomes differ between expansion open-door laminoplasty with foraminotomy (EOLF) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of coexisting multilevel cervical myelopathy and unilateral radiculopathy (CMUR).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

No reports to date have compared clinical outcomes between anterior and posterior decompression for CMUR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively performed ACDF (n=59) in 2004, 2006, and 2008 and EOLF (n=62) in 2005, 2007, and 2009. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and recovery rate were evaluated. For radiographic evaluation, the lordotic angle and range of motion at C2-C7 were investigated.

RESULTS

Only 110 patients could be followed for >3 years (EOLF/ACDF: 56/54; follow-up rate, 90.9%). Demographics were similar between the 2 groups. Compared with ACDF, in EOLF group there were shorter operating time (144 vs. 178 min), less bleeding (175 vs. 192 mL), and fewer complications (P<0.05). Results of JOA score and recovery rate, at 3-year postoperative follow-up, showed no statistical difference for the 2 groups. Cervical lordosis of ACDF increased from 13.7 to 16.2 degrees, whereas that of EOLF group decreased from 14.6 to 13.3 degrees (P<0.05). The percentage of range of motion declined in the 2 groups (ACDF/EOLF), 57.4% versus 74.7% (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The 2 surgical procedures have similar clinical effects in treating multisegmental CMUR. However, the EOLF group demonstrated shorter operative time, less blood loss, and fewer complications; therefore, it proved to be a more effective and safer method.

Two-year clinical and radiological outcomes of open-door cervical laminoplasty with prophylactic bilateral C4-C5 foraminotomy in a prospective study

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the 2-year outcomes of open-door cervical laminoplasty with prophylactic bilateral C4-C5 foraminotomy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A prospective trial of prophylactic bilateral C4-C5 foraminotomy with open-door laminoplasty for cervical compression myelopathy showed a significant efficacy for preventing postoperative C5 palsy. However, in bilateral foraminotomy, there are concerns such as postoperative instability, hinge fracture, or nonunion, which may cause deterioration of neurological symptoms and neck pain.

METHODS

A prospective trial was performed in 141 patients between 2009 and 2010 (group F). A group of 141 patients who underwent open-door laminoplasty without prophylactic foraminotomy from 2006 to 2008 served as a control group (group NF). Here, we report 2-year radiological and clinical data for 121 patients (follow-up rate: 85.8%) in group F and 115 patients (81.6%) in group NF. The 2 groups were demographically similar, except for the operation time.

RESULTS

In group F, the mean rate of facet joint preservation was 71.4%. C2-C7 and C4-C5 lordosis and C4 translational movement were maintained postoperatively in both groups. The range of motion of C2-C7 and C4-C5 significantly decreased to about 80% of the preoperative values in both groups (P < 0.01). These radiological parameters and the incidence of hinge fracture and nonunion did not differ significantly between the groups. Visual analogue scale scores for neck pain were unchanged and significant recoveries (P < 0.001) in Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores were found in both groups. There were no significant differences in these clinical scores between the groups. The incidences of C5 palsy were 1.7% and 7.0% in groups F and NF, respectively (P = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic bilateral C4-C5 foraminotomy did not adversely affect the 2-year radiological and clinical outcomes. Therefore, we conclude that this approach is an effective and desirable procedure for preventing postoperative C5 palsy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

A retrospective study of congenital osseous anomalies at the craniocervical junction treated by occipitocervical plate-rod systems

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of posterior occipitocervical reconstruction using the anchors of cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems for patients with congenital osseous anomalies at the craniocervical junction.

METHODS

Twenty patients with congenital osseous lesions who underwent posterior occipitocervical fusion using the anchors of cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems for reduction and fixation from 1996 to 2009 were reviewed. The lesions included os odontoideum, occipitalization of the atlas, congenital C2-3 fusion, congenital atlantoaxial subluxation, congenital basilar invagination and combined anomalies. The clinical assessment and the measurements of the images were performed preoperatively, postoperatively and at most recent follow-up.

RESULTS

The combined deformity of flexion of the occipitoatlantoaxial complex and invagination of the odontoid process associated with congenital osseous lesions at the craniocervical junction was corrected by application of combined forces of extension and distraction between the occiput and the cervical pedicle screws. Preoperative myelopathy improved in 94.7% patients. The mean Ranawat value, Redlund-Johnnell value, atlantodental distance, occiput (O)-C2 angle, and C2-C7 lordosis angle improved postoperatively and was sustained at most recent follow-up. The mean cervicomedullary angle improved from 129.3° preoperatively to 153.3° postoperatively. The mean range of motion at the lower adjacent motion segment remained unchanged at most recent follow-up. The fusion rate was 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study indicate that posterior occipitocervical reconstruction using the anchors of cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems is an effective technique for treatment of deformities and/or instability caused by congenital osseous anomalies at the craniocervical junction.

Clinical outcomes and predictive factors relating to prognosis of conservative and surgical treatments for cervical spondylotic amyotrophy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective clinical analyses of patients with cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA).

OBJECTIVE

To report the clinical outcomes and predictive factors relating to the prognosis in conservative and surgical treatments for CSA.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

CSA is a clinical entity characterized by muscle atrophy in the upper extremity without marked sensory disturbance or spastic tetraparesis. The indications for, and outcomes of conservative and surgical treatments for CSA have not been clearly enunciated.

METHODS

Ninety patients with CSA were enrolled in this study. All of them initially received continuous cervical traction for 2 to 3 weeks as inpatients. If this conservative treatment was ineffective, surgical intervention was carried out after informed consent was obtained. We investigated the outcome of conservative treatment, the predictive factors relating to the prognosis of the conservative treatment, and the outcome of surgery after initial conservative treatment failed.

RESULTS

After initial conservative treatment, 42 patients (46.7%) showed excellent or good outcome, 29 patients underwent surgery, and 19 patients declined surgery. Consequently, 61 patients were conservatively followed up. At final follow-up, 40% of the patients still showed excellent or good neurologic status by conservative treatment, and this group was characterized by age <50 years, duration of symptoms <6 months, single-level stenosis, foraminal stenosis, and a good response to traction therapy. Additional 5 patients underwent surgery during follow-up because of deterioration of symptom, and 34 patients consequently underwent surgery at the final follow-up. Of 34, 28 (82%) patients who underwent surgery obtained neurologic improvement.

CONCLUSION

The present study has demonstrated the outcome of conservative and of surgical treatments for CSA, together with the predictive factors relating to the prognosis. Conservative treatment should be initially tried on CSA patients, especially those with predictive factors relating to a better prognosis. However, if conservative treatment failed, surgical intervention was successful.

Bilaterally symmetric cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: a novel presentation and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA) is considered a syndrome of (1) unilateral upper extremity weakness and atrophy, (2) affecting either the proximal or distal musculature, (3) without sensory impairment or lower extremity dysfunction.

AIMS OF STUDY

The authors report a novel case of bilaterally symmetric CSA with blurring of the proximal-distal distinction, discuss the pathophysiology, and review the literature.

METHODS

A 45 year old man presented with a several year history of insidiously progressive bilaterally symmetric upper extremity weakness and wasting, profound in the proximal musculature and moderate to severe in the distal muscle groups.

RESULTS

Based on the clinical, neuroimaging and electrodiagnostic features, this patient harbors a more severe phenotype of the classical syndrome.

CONCLUSION

The authors propose expanding the generally accepted definition of CSA to include this bilaterally symmetric form of disease, thereby minimizing diagnostic error or delay. Additionally, based on this case and a review of the literature, adherence to the proximal-distal distinction should be avoided since it is commonly blurred. Accurate diagnosis is crucial since this presentation mimics the motor neuron disease variant Vulpian-Bernhardt syndrome. The importance of early diagnosis is underscored by reports of significant improvement with timely surgical decompression.

Distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: incidence and outcome after central corpectomy

OBJECT

Distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA) is a rare form of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). The authors documented the incidence, clinical presentation, radiological features, and outcome following central corpectomy (CC) in patients with this entity.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective institutional database search of patients who underwent decompressive surgery for CSM between 1992 and 2006 to identify patients with distal-type CSA. Distal-type CSA was defined as weakness and wasting of hands and forearms without gait impairment (Nurick Grades 0 and 1) nor any sensory symptoms or signs in the lower limbs.

RESULTS

The authors identified 7 male patients (1.1%) with distal-type CSA from among 653 patients who underwent either cervical laminectomy (135 patients) or CC (518 patients). There were sensory symptoms or signs in the upper limbs in all but 1 of the patients. Increased signal intensity in the cord was demonstrated on T2-weighted MR images in all patients. The compression was mainly at the C-6 vertebral level. At a mean follow-up of 46.5 months (range 12-98 months), 6 patients had improved by a mean patient perceived outcome score of 66.7% (range 20-100%). Patients' modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores improved from a preoperative mean (+/- SD) of 16.1 +/- 0.7, to a follow-up mean of 17.4 +/- 0.5 (p = 0.004, paired t-test). One patient whose condition worsened 7 months after CC received a diagnosis of a coexistent motor neuron disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal-type CSA is a rare form of CSM that should be differentiated from motor neuron disease on the basis of subtle sensory symptoms or signs in the upper limbs, and the presence of significant cord compression on the MR imaging. Patient outcome after central corpectomy is good and long lasting.