Optimal Treatment of C3 Lamina in Cervical Laminoplasty

STUDY DESIGN

Results of C4-C6 laminoplasty with C3 laminectomy and C3-C6 laminoplasty were compared retrospectively.

OBJECTIVES

To clarify the difference between C3 laminectomy and C3 laminoplasty in cervical laminoplasty.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Intraoperative damage to the semispinalis cervicis has been shown to lead to postoperative axial symptoms and reduced range of motion (ROM). To prevent this event, C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty is considered superior to C3 laminoplasty.

METHODS

A total of 36 patients were included in this study: 20 patients (GroupA) of C3 laminectomy, C4-C6 laminoplasty compared with 16 patients (GroupB) of C3-C6 laminoplasty. We collected patient's background data, operative time, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, VAS score, and radiologic findings such as C2-C7 Cobb angle, ROM, C2 inter-spinous angle, and use of postoperative PRN medication were compared.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the C2-C7 Cobb angles between the 2 groups before and after surgery (P = 0.315). In ROM, there was a 17.7% decrease from 31.5 preoperatively to 25.9 postoperatively in Group A, and a 6.1% decrease from 29.3 preoperatively to 27.5 postoperatively in Group B. There was no statistically significant difference in ROM (P = 0.683). Postoperative neck pain (VAS) was significantly lower in Group A than in Group B both at 1 week (P = 0.015) and 1 month (P = 0.035) after surgery. The C2 inter-spinous angle was statistically significantly smaller in Group A than in Group B (P = 0.004). Clinical outcomes and surgical outcomes did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

If the C2 interspinous angle is wide and intraoperative semispinalis capitis damage can be minimized, it is worth trying C3 laminoplasty, but if the C2 inter-spinous angle is narrow, C3 laminectomy is recommended from the beginning.

Novel Three-Holed Titanium Plate Fixation during Open Door Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Comparison with Conventional Titanium Plate

OBJECTIVE

For reconstructing the posterior cervical muscular-ligament complex, attachment points and various modified techniques were designed and applied in clinical practice. This study investigated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of open door laminoplasty with modified centerpiece mini-plate fixation and extensor attachment point reconstruction in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with CSM who underwent C3-C7 open door laminoplasty at our hospital from January 2016 to May 2018 were divided into two groups: 37 and 32 patients underwent laminoplasty with modified and conventional centerpiece titanium plate fixation (MPF and CPF groups), respectively. Changes in cervical spinal angle (CSA), cervical range of motion (ROM), posterior cervical muscle atrophy, neurological function (Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] score), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and axial symptom severity were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in operative duration (136.7 ± 23.9 vs 128.3 ± 21.5 min, t = 1.525, p > 0.05), volume of intraoperative blood loss (275.9 ± 33.1 vs 268.2 ± 31.6 ml, t = 0.984, p > 0.05), lamina open angle (41.2° ± 4.5° vs 39.4° ± 4.1°, t = 1.726, p > 0.05), and spinal cord drift distance (2.4 ± 0.3 vs 2.3 ± 0.4 mm, t = 1.184, p > 0.05) between the two groups. After surgery, JOA score significantly increased (p < 0.05), and neurological recovery rates were similar (62.7% vs 63.4%, t = 0.208, p > 0.05). The NDI score was significantly decreased in both the groups (p < 0.05); however, the MPF group recovered to a greater degree than the CPF group (8.3 ± 1.2 vs 9.8 ± 1.4) (t = 4.793, p < 0.05). There was no significant change in cervical ROM postoperatively compared with preoperatively in either group (p > 0.05). CSA decreased from 21.7° ± 2.8° to 18.3° ± 2.1°, and posterior cervical muscle cross-sectional area decreased from 35.2 ± 4.9 cm² to 31.0 ± 4.1 cm² in the CPF group (p < 0.05), but no significant change was observed in the MPF group (20.6° ± 2.5° to 20.4° ± 2.6°and 35.9 ± 5.1 to 34.1 ± 4.6 cm² , respectively) (p > 0.05). Postoperative axial symptom severity was significantly worse in the CPF group than in the MPF group (Z = -2.357, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

As an improvement to the conventional titanium plate, the modified centerpiece titanium plate effectively provides an attachment point for the posterior muscle-ligament complex, reducing posterior cervical muscle atrophy and improving neck function, without inflicting additional surgical trauma.

Clinical outcome and radiological findings after cervical open door laminoplasty with titanium basket

OBJECT

Cervical laminoplasty, which is well described in the Japanese literature, is the gold standard for decompressing multilevel spinal cord compression. Several spacers have been introduced to provide enough decompression of the spinal canal and reconstruct the stable posterior elements. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate radiological outcomes after open door laminoplasty using the titanium spacer (Laminoplasty Basket: L-Basket; Ammtec, Tokyo).

METHODS

Between July 2014 and June 2016, 31 patients with cervical spondylotic disease, including OPLL, were underwent open door laminoplasty with this device. All patients were clinically assessed by JOA score. The average follow-up period was 48.9 months with a range of 37-60 months. Postoperative radiological evaluation revealed bone union on both the open side and the gutter side from 12 months to 36 months after surgery on computed tomography.

RESULTS

The clinical outcome improved from 10.9 points on the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale to 15.8 points at 3 months after surgery and there were no significant major complications such as the implant failure. The bone union rate of the gutter side was 85.9% (85/99) at 1 year, 96.0% (95/99) at 3 years after surgery and of the open side was 57.6% (57/99) at 1 year, 89.9% (89/99) at 3 years after surgery. Circumferential fusion was confirmed 85.9% (85/99) of the time.

CONCLUSION

This titanium spacer seemed to have the potential of promoting bone union between the spacer and both lamina, and lateral mass in cervical laminoplasty which is a safe procedure with satisfactory clinical results.

Multilevel posterior foraminotomy with laminoplasty versus laminoplasty alone for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with radiculopathy: a comparative study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Conventional laminoplasty is useful for expanding a stenotic spinal canal. However, it has limited use for the decompression of accompanying neural foraminal stenosis. As such, an additional posterior foraminotomy could be simultaneously applied, although this procedure carries a risk of segmental kyphosis and instability.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to elucidate the long-term surgical outcomes of additional posterior foraminotomy with laminoplasty (LF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) with radiculopathy.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective comparative study was carried out.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Ninety-eight consecutive patients who underwent laminoplasty for CSM with radiculopathy between January 2006 and December 2012 were screened for eligibility. This study included 66 patients, who were treated with a laminoplasty of two or more levels and followed up for more than 2 years after surgery.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, JOA recovery rates, and visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. The C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis distance, cervical lordosis, range of motion (ROM), and angulation and vertebral slippage at the foraminotomy level were used to measure radiological outcomes using the whole spine anterioposterior or lateral and dynamic lateral radiographs.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients with CSM with radiculopathy involving two or more levels were consecutively treated with laminoplasty and followed up for more than 2 years after surgery. The first 26 patients underwent laminoplasty alone (LA group), whereas the next 40 patients underwent an additional posterior foraminotomy at stenotic neural foramens with radiating symptoms in addition to laminoplasty (LF group). In the LF group, the foraminotomy with less resection than 50% of facet joint to avoid segmental kyphosis and instability was performed at 78 segments (unilateral-to-bilateral ratio=57:21) and 99 sites. Clinical and radiographic data were assessed preoperatively and at 2-year follow-up and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The NDI, JOA scores, JOA recovery rates, and VAS for neck and arm pain were improved significantly in both groups after surgery. The improvement in the VAS for arm pain was significantly greater in the LF group (from 5.55±2.52 to 1.85±2.39) than the LA group (from 5.48±2.42 to 3.40±2.68) (p<.001). Although cervical lordosis and ROM decreased postoperatively in both groups, there were no significant differences in the degree of reduction between the LF and LA groups. Although the postoperative focal angulation and slippage were slightly increased in the LF group, this was not to a significant degree. Furthermore, segmental kyphosis and instability were not observed in the LF group, regardless of whether the patient underwent a unilateral or bilateral foraminotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional posterior foraminotomy with laminoplasty is likely to improve arm pain more significantly than laminoplasty alone by decompressing nerve roots. Also, performing posterior foraminotomy via multiple levels or bilaterally did not significantly affect segmental malalignment and instability. Therefore, when a laminoplasty is performed for CSM with radiculopathy, an additional posterior foraminotomy could be an efficient and safe treatment that improves both myelopathy symptoms and radicular arm pain.

Box-shape cervical expansive laminoplasty: clinical and radiological outcomes

Objective

Box-shape cervical expansive laminoplasty is a procedure that utilizes a Miniplate® or Maxpacer® to achieve maximal canal expansion. This method is expected to show much larger canal expansion and good clinical outcome. So we investigated the clinical and radiological outcome of Box-shape cervical expansive laminoplasty.

Methods

Between June 2008 and July 2013, we performed cervical expansive laminoplasty in 87 and 48 patients using the Box-shape cervical expansive laminoplasty, respectively. We analyzed the clinical results of these operations using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system and by assessing the position of intralaminar screws with postoperative computed tomography (CT) at POD-6 months.

Results

A total of 48 patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) (36 pts), cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) (12 pts) were enrolled. Overall JOA scores improved from 11.49 to 14.22 at POD-6 months (OPLL: 11.32 -->14.3; CSM: 12-->14). Postoperative CT scans were performed in 39 patients at 177 levels for a total of 354 screws. The malpositioning rate of intralaminar screws was 3.4% and hardware-related neurologic complications did not occur.

Conclusion

Box-shape cervical expansive laminoplasty creates maximal spinal canal expansion and leads to improved cervical myelopathy. The use of intralaminar screws to fix the remodeled lamina-facet does not represent a significant difficulty.