What is the Preferable Method for the C3 and C7 Segments in Unilateral Open-Door Laminoplasty for Patients Diagnosed with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

BACKGROUND

Traditional C3-C7 unilateral open-door laminoplasty (UOLP) often leads to various postoperative complications as a result of damage of cervical posterior muscles and nuchal ligaments. We aimed to thoroughly evaluate postoperative outcomes after our modified UOLP versus traditional UOLP in treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM).

METHODS

Seventy-six patients with MCSM who underwent the modified UOLP with C3 laminectomy and C7 upper hemilaminectomy (40 patients) or traditional C3-C7 UOLP (36 patients) were included. Preoperative and postoperative cervical radiologic parameters, as well as clinical and surgical outcomes, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores improved significantly more in the modified UOLP group than in the traditional UOLP group (P = 0.028), whereas visual analog scale scores and Neck Disability Index improved similarly in both groups. Follow-up scores for Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale were not significantly different between the 2 groups. At the final follow-up, the C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis and T1 slope increased in the traditional UOLP group and did not change in the modified UOLP group and were unchanged in the modified UOLP group. The C2-C7 Cobb angle decreased significantly in the traditional UOLP group and did not change in the modified UOLP group. The modified UOLP group lost less cervical posterior muscle area compared with the traditional UOLP group (3.72% ± 3.54% vs. 6.67% ± 2.81%; P < 0.001). The range of motion in the modified UOLP group was significantly greater than in the traditional UOLP group at the final follow-up (P < 0.001). Also, the modified UOLP group experienced a notable reduction in operative time, blood loss volume, and postoperative hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend performing our modified UOLP with C3 laminectomy and C7 upper hemilaminectomy instead of traditional C3-C7 UOLP.

Optimal Treatment of C3 Lamina in Cervical Laminoplasty

STUDY DESIGN

Results of C4-C6 laminoplasty with C3 laminectomy and C3-C6 laminoplasty were compared retrospectively.

OBJECTIVES

To clarify the difference between C3 laminectomy and C3 laminoplasty in cervical laminoplasty.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Intraoperative damage to the semispinalis cervicis has been shown to lead to postoperative axial symptoms and reduced range of motion (ROM). To prevent this event, C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty is considered superior to C3 laminoplasty.

METHODS

A total of 36 patients were included in this study: 20 patients (GroupA) of C3 laminectomy, C4-C6 laminoplasty compared with 16 patients (GroupB) of C3-C6 laminoplasty. We collected patient's background data, operative time, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, VAS score, and radiologic findings such as C2-C7 Cobb angle, ROM, C2 inter-spinous angle, and use of postoperative PRN medication were compared.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the C2-C7 Cobb angles between the 2 groups before and after surgery (P = 0.315). In ROM, there was a 17.7% decrease from 31.5 preoperatively to 25.9 postoperatively in Group A, and a 6.1% decrease from 29.3 preoperatively to 27.5 postoperatively in Group B. There was no statistically significant difference in ROM (P = 0.683). Postoperative neck pain (VAS) was significantly lower in Group A than in Group B both at 1 week (P = 0.015) and 1 month (P = 0.035) after surgery. The C2 inter-spinous angle was statistically significantly smaller in Group A than in Group B (P = 0.004). Clinical outcomes and surgical outcomes did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

If the C2 interspinous angle is wide and intraoperative semispinalis capitis damage can be minimized, it is worth trying C3 laminoplasty, but if the C2 inter-spinous angle is narrow, C3 laminectomy is recommended from the beginning.

Impact of C3 laminectomy on cervical sagittal alignment in cervical laminoplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between C3 laminectomy with C4-C6 laminoplasty and C3-C6 laminoplasty

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty is a modified laminoplasty technique that can preserve the semispinalis cervicis muscle attached to the C2 spinous process. Several previous studies have shown that this technique can lead to better outcomes of postoperative axial neck pain and C2-C3 range of motion (ROM) than conventional cervical laminoplasty. However, there is still a lack of understanding of total and proportional postoperative cervical sagittal alignment outcomes.

PURPOSE

To assess the effects of C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty on postoperative cervical alignment and clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

A single-center, patient-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We included consecutive 126 patients diagnosed with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) or ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) who were scheduled for cervical laminoplasty from March 2017 to January 2020.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were C2-C7 Cobb angle (CA) and neck disability index (NDI). Secondary outcomes measures included other clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters including segmental Cobb angle and presence of C2-C3 interlaminar fusion.

METHODS

Patients were randomly allocated to either the C3 laminectomy with C4-C6 laminoplasty group (LN group) or the C3-C6 laminoplasty group (LP group) at a 1:1 ratio. Laminoplasty was performed using a unilateral open-door technique and stabilized with titanium mini plates. A linear mixed model analysis was employed to examine the longitudinal data from postoperative 1-year through 3-year. Additional analysis between three types of cervical sagittal alignment morphology was done.

RESULTS

Among 122 patients who were randomly allocated to one of two groups (LN group, n=61; LP group, n=61), modified intent-to-treat analysis was done for 109 patients (LN group, n=51, LP group, n=58) who had available at least a year of postoperative data. Postoperative C2-C7 CA was not significantly different between the two groups. However, NDI was significantly different between the two groups (12.8±1.0 in the LN group vs 8.6±1.0 in LP group, p=.005), which exceeded the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). The postoperative C2-C3 CA was significantly greater in the LN group (7.1±0.5° in LN group vs 3.2±0.5° in LP group, p<.001) while C4-C7 CA was significantly smaller in the LN group (3.9±0.8° in LN group vs 7.7±0.7° in LP group, p<.001) with greater cSVA in the LN group (31.6±1.4 mm in LN group vs 25.5±1.3 mm in LP group at postoperative 3-year, p=.002). Postoperative Euro-Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), numerical rating scores for neck pain (NRS-N) were significantly better in the LP group than in the LN group (all p<.05) and only EQ-5D surpassed the MCID. The C2-C3 fusion rate was significantly different between the LN group (9.8%) and the LP group (44.8%) (p<.001). The LN group showed a higher prevalence of a specific cervical alignment morphology characterized by a sigmoid shape with proximal lordosis and distal kyphosis (S curve). This S curve demonstrated significantly unfavorable outcomes across multiple outcome variables.

CONCLUSION

The impact of C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty on postoperative kyphosis among patients with CSM or OPLL did not significantly differ from that of C3-C6 laminoplasty. However, C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty might result in an unfavorable clinical outcome with an unbalanced cervical sagittal alignment characterized by a sigmoid shape with proximal lordosis and distal kyphosis.

Relationship Between C2 Semispinalis Cervicis Preservation and C2 Spinous Process Morphology During Cervical Laminoplasty Involving C3

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES

Due to anatomical variations in the semispinalis cervicis insertion in the C2 spinous process, complete preservation is not always possible when the C3 level is included in a cervical laminoplasty. Three-dimensional computed tomography was used to evaluate the relationship between the incidence of semispinalis cervicis injury and the C2 inter-spinous angle.

METHODS

We included 95 patients who underwent a cervical laminoplasty that included a C3 laminectomy for cervical myelopathy. Patients with a C2 inter-spinous angle above and below 60° were classified into wide- and narrow-angled groups, respectively (n = 48 and n = 47). Whether the C2 semispinalis cervicis insertion was preserved, or detached and reattached was reviewed from surgical records. The pre and postoperative C2-C7 lordosis and range of motion (ROM) were measured, and clinical outcomes were obtained from the patient charts.

RESULTS

The C2 semispinalis cervicis was preserved in 47 patients (97.9%) in the wide-angled group but only in 14 patients (29.8%) in the narrow-angled group (P < .001). The postoperative C2-C7 lordosis extension and ROM were significantly greater in the wide-angled (P = .048 and .036). Postoperative neck pain was significantly greater in the narrow-angled (P = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

The morphology of the C2 spinous process indicates that a C2 semispinalis cervicis insertion preservation is possible during a cervical laminoplasty that includes a C3 laminectomy. A careful surgical procedure should be conducted when the C2 inter-spinous angle is above 60° to increase the likelihood of achieving this preservation and thereby obtaining a more favorable clinical outcomes.

Is laminoplasty or laminectomy the best strategy for C3 segment in French-door laminoplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

To compare the clinical outcomes of C₃ laminectomy and C₃ laminoplasty at the C₃ segment during French-door laminoplasty.

Methods

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to November 10, 2020 for studies comparing the clinical outcomes of two types of French-door laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). Review Manager 5.3 was used to analyze the following outcomes: operative time, intraoperative blood loss, preoperative and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, recovery rate, cervical curvature, cervical range of motion (ROM), incidence of axial symptoms (AS), and C_2-3 bony fusion rate.

Results

A total of eight studies involving 776 patients were included; there were 424 patients in the C₃ laminectomy group and 352 patients in the C₃ laminoplasty group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the C₃ laminectomy group was superior to the C₃ laminoplasty group in terms of operative time (P < 0.00001), cervical ROM (P = 0.04), and incidence of AS (P < 0.0001). However, no statistically significant differences between the two groups were noted regarding intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.44), preoperative JOA score (P = 0.57), postoperative JOA score (P = 0.09), recovery rate (P = 0.25), cervical curvature (P = 0.22), and C_2-3 bony fusion rate (P = 0.06).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrated that both C₃ laminoplasty and C₃ laminectomy could effectively improve neurological function in patients with MCSM in French-door laminoplasty. However, C₃ laminectomy can reduce the operative time, preserve cervical ROM, and reduce the incidence of postoperative AS.

Trial registration

PROSPERO registration number is CRD42021230798.

Date of registration: February 11, 2021.

C3 laminectomy combined with modified unilateral laminoplasty and in situ reconstruction of the midline structures maintained cervical sagittal balance: a retrospective matched-pair case-control study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Open-door laminoplasty often results in postoperative complications such as loss of cervical lordosis, limitations of cervical motion, and axial symptoms. However, current modified laminoplasty techniques such as muscle-sparing type or spinous process splitting technique are not as effective as expected.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes of C3 laminectomy combined with modified unilateral laminoplasty (preservation of posterior muscle-ligament complex and reconstruction of the midline structures) versus traditional open door laminoplasty in treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

One hundred and eleven patients with multilevel cord compression and myelopathic symptoms.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome parameters were operation time, blood loss volume, complications, osseous fusion status, C0-C2 and C2-C7 Cobb angles, T1 slope, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), cervical curvature index (CCI), range of motion (ROM), cross-sectional area (CSA) of the semispinalis cervicis, axial symptoms, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and neck disability index (NDI).

METHODS

We matched 37 patients who underwent modified laminoplasty with 74 patients treated by traditional open door laminoplasty (ratio, 1:2) according to age, sex, body mass index, compromised level, and radiographic characteristics. Preoperative and postoperative cervical parameters, namely, the C2-C7 Cobb angle, ROM, and CCI were measured on X-ray films. The CSA of the semispinalis cervicis was assessed on magnetic resonance images, and osseous fusion status of the hinge side and the osteotomy site was evaluated by computed tomography. We used the JOA and VAS scores, and the NDI to evaluate clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The average follow-up period in the modified group was 24.1 months (range, 18-37 months) compared with 24.7 months (range, 18-38 months) in the control group. At the final follow-up, C0-C2 Cobb angle, T1 slope, and cSVA increased in the control group and were unchanged in the modified group. The C2-C7 Cobb angle decreased significantly in the control group and did not change in the modified group. ROM and CCI loss rate did not change in the modified group but decreased significantly in the control group. The CSA loss in the semispinalis cervicis was 222.90±79.56 mm² in the control group and 49.11±75.93 mm² in the modified group, with a significant difference (p<.001). The final CSA of the semispinalis cervicis at C2 and C4-C7 levels showed no significant difference in the modified group and decreased significantly in the control group compared with preoperation. Changes in the C2-C7 Cobb angle and cSVA were both correlated with the CSA loss of the semispinalis cervicis (r=0.282, p=.003; r=0.267, p=.005, respectively). Moreover, the CSA loss of the semispinalis cervicis also correlated with the CCI loss rate and the changes in ROM (r=0.312, p=.001; r=0.287, p=.002, respectively). Clinical outcomes such as VAS and NDI scores, improved significantly more in the modified group versus the controls (p<.001 and p=.005, respectively), while JOA scores improved similarly in both groups (p=.132). The incidence of axial symptoms was significantly lower in the modified group versus controls (5.4% vs 9.5%, respectively; p=.023).

CONCLUSIONS

C3 laminectomy combined with modified unilateral laminoplasty is effective for treating patients with multilevel cord compression. This modified technique reconstructs the midline structures and may lead to improved alignment and less axial pain.

Neck Pain Following Cervical Laminoplasty: Does Preservation of the C2 Muscle Attachments and/or C7 Matter?

Study Design Systematic review. Objective In patients aged 18 years or older, with cervical spondylotic myelopathy or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), does sparing the C2 muscle attachments and/or C7-preserving cervical laminoplasty lead to reduced postoperative axial pain compared with conventional C3 to C7 laminoplasty? Do these results vary based on early active postoperative cervical motion? Methods A systematic review of the English-language literature was undertaken for articles published between 1970 and August 17, 2012. Electronic databases and reference lists of key articles were searched to identify studies evaluating C2/C3- or C7-preserving cervical laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) or OPLL in adults. Studies involving traumatic onset, cervical fracture, infection, deformity, or neoplasms were excluded, as were noncomparative studies. Two independent reviewers assessed the level of evidence quality using the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) system, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Results We identified 11 articles meeting our inclusion criteria. Only the randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed no significant difference in late axial pain (at 12 months) when C7 spinous muscle preservation was compared with no preservation. However, seven other retrospective cohort studies showed significant pain relief in the preserved group compared with the nonpreserved group. The preservation group included those with preservation of the C7 spinous process and/or attached muscles, the deep extensor muscles, or C2 muscle attachment and/or C3 laminectomy (as opposed to laminoplasty). One study that included preservation of either the C2 or C7 posterior paraspinal muscles found that only preservation of the muscles attached to C2 resulted in reduced postoperative pain. Another study that included preservation of either the C7 spinous process or the deep extensor muscles found that only preservation of C7 resulted in reduced postoperative pain. Conclusion Although there is conflicting data regarding the importance of preserving C7 and/or the semispinalis cervicis muscle attachments to C2, there is enough evidence to suggest that surgeons should make every attempt to preserve these structures whenever possible since there appears to be little downside to doing so, unless it compromises the neurologic decompression.