Radiation Doses in Patient Eye Lenses during Interventional Neuroradiology Procedures

Cumulative Effective Dose During Fluoroscopically Guided Interventions (FGI): Analysis of More Than 5000 FGIs in a Single European Center

BACKGROUND

The number of fluoroscopically guided interventions (FGI) has increased significantly over time. However, little attention has been paid to possible stochastic radiation effects. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the number of patients who received cumulative effective doses over 100 mSv during FGI procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Five thousand five hundred and fifty four classified FGI procedures were included. Radiation dose data, retrieved from an in-house-dose-management system, was analysed. Effective doses and cumulative effective doses (CED) were calculated. Patients who received a CED > 100 mSv were identified. Radiology reports, patient age, imaging and clinical data of these patients were used to identify reasons for CED ≥ 100 mSv.

RESULTS

One Hundred and thirty two (41.1% female) of 3981 patients received a CED > 100 mSy, with a mean CED of 173.5 ± 84.5 mSv. Mean age at first intervention was 66.1 ± 11.7 years. 81 (61.4%) of 132 were older than 64 years, one patient was < 30 years. 110 patients received ≥ 100 mSv within one year (83.4%), through FGIs: EVAR, pelvic/mesenteric interventions (stent or embolization), hepatic interventions (chemoembolization, TIPSS), embolization of cerebral aneurysms or arterio-venous-malformations.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial CED may occur in a small but not ignorable fraction of patients (~ 3%) undergoing FGIs. Approximately 2/3rd of patients may most likely not encounter radiation-related stochastic effects due to life-threatening diseases and age at first treatment > 65 years but 1/3rd may. Patients undergoing more than one FGI (77%) carry a higher risk of accumulating effective doses > 100 mSv. Remarkably, 23% received a mean CED 162.2 ± 72.3 mSv in a single procedure.

Eye radiation dose from breast cancer screening using full field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: A phantom study

INTRODUCTION

The eye lens is recently classified as one of the most radiosensitive tissues by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), and it has been suggested that the eye lens receives radiation dose during mammography due to scatter radiation. The aim of this study was to investigate the radiation dose received by the lens of the clients' eye from Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) screening.

METHODS

The eye radiation dose received by ATOM dosimetry phantom was estimated with thermo-luminescent dosemeters (TLDs). One TLD was utilised for each eye. A breast phantom was exposed for four-view screening mammography using 16 FFDM machines and one DBT machine. The breast phantom was exposed three times for each mammographic position and an average TLD dose reading was considered to minimise random error.

RESULTS

For four-view FFDM screening, the phantom eye radiation dose ranges from 0.013 mGy to 0.029 mGy with a mean±sd of 0.019 ± 0.005 mGy. A higher eye radiation dose of 0.041 mGy was recorded from four-view DBT screening. The statistical analysis demonstrated that the eye lens radiation dose is strongly and significantly correlated to breast organ dose and X-ray tube voltage.

CONCLUSION

The phantom eye lens was exposed to scatter radiation from FFDM and DBT screening. The measured dose via the four-view DBT screening was higher than the four-view FFDM screening, but sits below the internationally acceptable ranges. If the findings of our paper hold true in practice, then the risk to the lens of the eyes for women attending breast screening is acceptable.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The new lens radiation dose levels recommended by the ICRP necessitate the reevaluation of eye radiation dose from different radiographic examinations, especially those used for screening purpose where healthy individuals involved.

Impact of a selective lens dose reduction protocol in 3D rotational angiography on radiation exposure to the eye lens during cerebral angiography: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate the radiation dose to the eye lens (lens dose) during cerebral angiography and to evaluate the effectiveness of the lens dose reduction protocol for 3-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) in reducing overall lens dose exposure.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial at a tertiary hospital with patients undergoing cerebral angiography. The lens dose reduction protocol in 3D-RA involved raising the table to position the patient's eye lens away from the rotation axis. The lens dose was estimated by measuring the entrance surface air kerma using a photoluminescent glass dosimeter. The lens doses of 3D-RA, overall examination, and image quality were analyzed and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 20 participants (mean age, 58±9.4 years; including 12 men [60%]) were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the conventional group or the dose reduction group. The median lens dose in 3D-RA was significantly lower in the dose reduction group compared with the conventional group (1.1 mGy vs 4.5 mGy, p<0.001). The total dose was significantly lower in the dose reduction group (median of 7.5 mGy vs 10.2 mGy, p=0.003). In the conventional group, 3D-RA accounted for 46% of the total lens dose, while in the dose reduction group, its proportion decreased to 16%. No significant differences were observed in the image quality between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The lens dose reduction protocol resulted in a significant reduction in the lens dose of the 3D-RA as well as entire cerebral angiography, while maintaining the image quality.

Image Quality and Radiation Dose of Conventional and Wide-Field High-Resolution Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Cerebral Angiography: A Phantom Study

There has been an increase in the use of interventional neuroradiology procedures because of their non-invasiveness compared to surgeries and the improved image quality of fluoroscopy, digital subtraction angiography, and rotational angiography. Although cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images are inferior to multi-detector CT images in terms of low-contrast detectability and lower radiation doses, CBCT scans are frequently performed because of their accessibility. This study aimed to evaluate the image quality and radiation dose of two different high-resolution CBCTs (HR CBCT): conventional (C-HR CBCT) and wide-field HR CBCT (W-HR CBCT). The modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were used to evaluate the image quality. On comparing the MTF of C-HR CBCT with a 256 × 256 matrix and that of W-HR CBCT with a 384 × 384 matrix, the MTF of W-HR CBCT with the 384 × 384 matrix was larger. A comparison of the NPS and CNR of C-HR CBCT with a 256 × 256 matrix and W-HR CBCT with a 384 × 384 matrix showed that both values were comparable. The reference air kerma values were equal for C-HR CBCT and W-HR CBCT; however, the value of the kerma area product was 1.44 times higher for W-HR CBCT compared to C-HR CBCT. The W-HR CBCT allowed for improved spatial resolution while maintaining the image noise and low-contrast detectability by changing the number of image matrices from 256 × 256 to 384 × 384. Our study revealed the image characteristics and radiation dose of W-HR CBCT. Given its advantages of low-contrast detectability and wide-area imaging with high spatial resolution, W-HR CBCT may be useful in interventional neuroradiology for acute ischemic stroke.

Fast dose calculation in x-ray guided interventions by using deep learning

Objective.Patient dose estimation in x-ray-guided interventions is essential to prevent radiation-induced biological side effects. Current dose monitoring systems estimate the skin dose based in dose metrics such as the reference air kerma. However, these approximations do not take into account the exact patient morphology and organs composition. Furthermore, accurate organ dose estimation has not been proposed for these procedures. Monte Carlo simulation can accurately estimate the dose by recreating the irradiation process generated during the x-ray imaging, but at a high computation time, limiting an intra-operative application. This work presents a fast deep convolutional neural network trained with MC simulations for patient dose estimation during x-ray-guided interventions.Approach.We introduced a modified 3D U-Net that utilizes a patient's CT scan and the numerical values of imaging settings as input to produce a Monte Carlo dose map. To create a dataset of dose maps, we simulated the x-ray irradiation process for the abdominal region using a publicly available dataset of 82 patient CT scans. The simulation involved varying the angulation, position, and tube voltage of the x-ray source for each scan. We additionally conducted a clinical study during endovascular abdominal aortic repairs to validate the reliability of our Monte Carlo simulation dose maps. Dose measurements were taken at four specific anatomical points on the skin and compared to the corresponding simulated doses. The proposed network was trained using a 4-fold cross-validation approach with 65 patients, and evaluating the performance on the remaining 17 patients during testing.Main results.The clinical validation demonstrated a average error within the anatomical points of 5.1%. The network yielded test errors of 11.5 ± 4.6% and 6.2 ± 1.5% for peak and average skin doses, respectively. Furthermore, the mean errors for the abdominal region and pancreas doses were 5.0 ± 1.4% and 13.1 ± 2.7%, respectively.Significance.Our network can accurately predict a personalized 3D dose map considering the current imaging settings. A short computation time was achieved, making our approach a potential solution for dose monitoring and reporting commercial systems.

Evaluation of Peak Skin Doses and Lens Doses during Interventional Neuroradiology Using a Direct Measurement System

Objective

In interventional neuroradiology (INR), the evaluation of the peak skin dose (PSD) and lens dose is important because the patient radiation dose increases in cases in which the procedure is more difficult and complex. This study evaluated the radiation doses during INR procedures using a direct measurement system.

Methods

Radiation dose measurements during INR were performed in 332 patients with unruptured aneurysm (URAN), dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF), and arteriovenous malformation (AVM). The PSD and bilateral lens doses were analyzed for each disease. The Pearson correlation test was used to determine whether the PSD and lens doses were linearly related to the reference air kerma (K_a,r).

Results

In all cases, the PSD and right and left lens doses were 2.36 ± 1.28 Gy, 114.2 ± 54.6 mGy, and 189.8 ± 160.3 mGy, respectively. The PSD and lens doses of the DAVF and AVM cases were significantly higher than those of the URAN case. The Pearson correlation test revealed statistically significant positive correlations between K_a,r and PSD, K_a,r and right lens dose, and K_a,r and left lens dose.

Conclusion

The characteristics of radiation dose in INR were clarified. Owing to the concern of increased radiation doses exceeding the threshold values in DAVF and AVM cases, protection from radiation is required. Simple regression analysis revealed the possibility of precisely predicting PSD using K_a,r.

Notifications and alerts in patient dose values for computed tomography and fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures

The terms "notifications" and "alerts" for medical exposures are used by several national and international organisations. Recommendations for CT scanners have been published by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Some interventional radiology societies as well as national authorities have also published dose notifications for fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures. Notifications and alerts may also be useful for optimisation and to avoid unintended and accidental exposures. The main interest in using these values for high-dose procedures (CT and interventional) is to optimise imaging procedures, reducing the probability of stochastic effects and avoiding tissue reactions. Alerts in X-ray systems may be considered before procedures (as in CT), during procedures (in some interventional radiology systems), and after procedures, when the patient radiation dose results are known and processed. This review summarises the different uses of notifications and alerts to help in optimisation for CT and for fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures as well as in the analysis of unintended and accidental medical exposures. The paper also includes cautions in setting the alert values and discusses the benefits of using patient dose management systems for the alerts, their registry and follow-up, and the differences between notifications, alerts, and trigger levels for individual procedures and the terms used for the collective approach, such as diagnostic reference levels. KEY POINTS: • Notifications and alerts on patient dose values for computed tomography (CT) and fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures (FGIP) allow to improve radiation safety and contribute to the avoidance of radiation injuries and unintended and accidental exposures. • Alerts may be established before the imaging procedures (as in CT) or during and after the procedures as for FGIP. • Dose management systems should include notifications and alerts and their registry for the hospital quality programmes.

Real-time Detection of Patient Head Position and Cephalometric Landmarks from Neuro-Interventional Procedure Images Using Machine Learning for Patient Eye-Lens Dose Prediction

A deep learning (DL) model has been developed to estimate patient-lens dose in real-time for given exposure and geometric conditions during fluoroscopically-guided neuro-interventional procedures. Parameters input into the DL model for dose prediction include the patient head shift from isocenter and cephalometric landmark locations as a surrogate for head size. Machine learning (ML) models were investigated to automatically detect these parameters from the in-procedure fluoroscopic image. Fluoroscopic images of a Kyoto Kagaku anthropomorphic head phantom were taken at various known X (transverse) and Y (longitudinal) shifts, as well as different magnification modes, to create an image database. For each image, anatomical landmark coordinate locations were obtained manually using ImageJ and are used as ground-truth labels for training. This database was then used to train the two separate ML models. One ML model predicts the patient head shift in both the X and Y directions and the other model predicts the coordinates of the anatomical landmarks. From the coordinates, the distance between these anatomical landmarks is calculated, and input into the DL dose-prediction model. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for the head-shift and landmark-coordinate models, respectively. The goal is to implement these two separate models into the Dose Tracking System (DTS) developed by our group. This would allow the DTS to automatically detect the patient head size and position for eye-lens dose prediction and eliminate the need for manual input by the clinical staff.

Radiation exposure during angiographic interventions in interventional radiology - risk and fate of advanced procedures

PURPOSE

Advanced angiographic procedures in interventional radiology are becoming more important and are more frequently used, especially in the treatment of several acute life-threatening diseases like stroke or aortic injury. In recent years, technical advancement has led to a broader spectrum of interventions and complex procedures with longer fluoroscopy times. This involves the risk of higher dose exposures, which, in rare cases, may cause deterministic radiation effects, e.g. erythema in patients undergoing angiographic procedures. Against this background, these procedures recently also became subject to national and international regulations regarding radiation protection. At the same time, individual risk assessment of possible stochastic radiation effects for each patient must be weighed up against the anticipated benefits of the therapy itself. Harmful effects of the administered dose are not limited to the patient but can also affect the radiologist and the medical staff. In particular, the development of cataracts in interventionalists is a rising matter of concern. Furthermore, long-term effects of repeated and prolonged x-ray exposure have long been neglected by radiologists but have come into focus in the past years.

CONCLUSIONS

With all this in mind, this review discusses different efforts to reduce radiation exposition levels for patients and medical staff by means of technical, personal as well as organizational measures.

European consensus on patient contact shielding

Patient contact shielding has been in use for many years in radiology departments in order to reduce the effects and risks of ionising radiation on certain organs. New technologies in projection imaging and CT scanning such as digital receptors and automatic exposure control systems have reduced doses and improved image consistency. These changes and a greater understanding of both the benefits and the risks from the use of shielding have led to a review of shielding use in radiology. A number of professional bodies have already issued guidance in this regard. This paper represents the current consensus view of the main bodies involved in radiation safety and imaging in Europe: European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics, European Federation of Radiographer Societies, European Society of Radiology, European Society of Paediatric Radiology, EuroSafe Imaging, European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), and European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). It is based on the expert recommendations of the Gonad and Patient Shielding (GAPS) Group formed with the purpose of developing consensus in this area. The recommendations are intended to be clear and easy to use. They are intended as guidance, and they are developed using a multidisciplinary team approach. It is recognised that regulations, custom and practice vary widely on the use of patient shielding in Europe and it is hoped that these recommendations will inform a change management program that will benefit patients and staff.

European consensus on patient contact shielding

Patient contact shielding has been in use for many years in radiology departments in order to reduce the effects and risks of ionising radiation on certain organs. New technologies in projection imaging and CT scanning such as digital receptors and automatic exposure control (AEC) systems have reduced doses and improved image consistency. These changes and a greater understanding of both the benefits and the risks from the use of shielding have led to a review of shielding use in radiology. A number of professional bodies have already issued guidance in this regard. This paper represents the current consensus view of the main bodies involved in radiation safety and imaging in Europe: European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics, European Federation of Radiographer Societies, European Society of Radiology, European Society of Paediatric Radiology, EuroSafe Imaging, European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), and European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). It is based on the expert recommendations of the Gonad and Patient Shielding (GAPS) Group formed with the purpose of developing consensus in this area. The recommendations are intended to be clear and easy to use. They are intended as guidance, and they are developed using a multidisciplinary team approach. It is recognised that regulations, custom and practice vary widely on the use of patient shielding in Europe and it is hoped that these recommendations will inform a change management program that will benefit patients and staff.

European consensus on patient contact shielding

Patient contact shielding has been in use for many years in radiology departments in order to reduce the effects and risks of ionising radiation on certain organs. New technologies in projection imaging and CT scanning such as digital receptors and automatic exposure control (AEC) systems have reduced doses and improved image consistency. These changes and a greater understanding of both the benefits and the risks from the use of shielding have led to a review of shielding use in radiology. A number of professional bodies have already issued guidance in this regard. This paper represents the current consensus view of the main bodies involved in radiation safety and imaging in Europe: European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics, European Federation of Radiographer Societies, European Society of Radiology, European Society of Paediatric Radiology, EuroSafe Imaging, European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), and European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). It is based on the expert recommendations of the Gonad and Patient Shielding (GAPS) Group formed with the purpose of developing consensus in this area. The recommendations are intended to be clear and easy to use. They are intended as guidance, and they are developed using a multidisciplinary team approach. It is recognised that regulations, custom and practice vary widely on the use of patient shielding in Europe and it is hoped that these recommendations will inform a change management program that will benefit patients and staff.

Lens dose reduction with a bismuth shield in neuro cone-beam computed tomography: an investigation on optimum shield device placement conditions

This study aimed to determine the placement distance, number, and position of the bismuth shield for developing a lens protective device for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). To determine the dose reduction rate, the lens doses were measured using an anthropomorphic head phantom and a real-time dosimeter. The image quality assessment was determined by analyzing the change in the pixel value, caused by the bismuth shield, and the artifact index was calculated from the pixel value and image noise within various regions of interest in the head phantom. When the distance between the bismuth shield and the subject was increased, the image quality deteriorated less, but there was also a decrease in the lens dose reduction rate. Upon changing the number of bismuth shields from 1-ply to 2-ply, the dose reduction rate increased; however, there was a decrease in the image quality. Additionally, placing the bismuth shield outside of the subject improved the dose reduction rate without deteriorating the image quality. The optimum placement conditions of the bismuth shield were concluded as follows: positioned outside, placed 10 mm from the surface of the subject, and used a 1-ply bismuth shield. When these placement conditions were used, the lens dose reduction rate was 26.9 ± 0.36% (right-left average) for the "bismuth shield: separate". The protective device developed in this study will contribute to radiation dose reduction in CBCT scans.

Radioprotection of eye lens using protective material in neuro cone-beam computed tomography: Estimation of dose reduction rate and image quality

PURPOSE

In cerebral angiography, for diagnosis and interventional neuroradiology, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan is frequently performed for evaluating brain parenchyma, cerebral hemorrhage, and cerebral infarction. However, the patient's eye lens is more frequently exposed to excessive doses in these scans than in the previous angiography and interventional neuroradiology (INR) procedures. Hence, radioprotection for the lenses is needed. This study selects the most suitable eye lens protection material for CBCT from among nine materials by evaluating the dose reduction rate and image quality.

METHODS

To determine the dose reduction rate, the lens doses were measured using an anthropomorphic head phantom and a real-time dosimeter. For image quality assessment, the artifact index was calculated based on the pixel value and image noise within various regions of interest in a water phantom.

RESULTS

The protective materials exhibited dose reduction; however, streak artifacts were observed near the materials. The dose reduction rate and the degree of the artifact varied significantly depending on the protective material. The dose reduction rates were 14.6%, 14.2%, and 26.0% when bismuth shield: normal (bismuth shield in the shape of an eye mask), bismuth shield: separate (two separate bismuth shields), and lead goggles were used, respectively. The "separate" bismuth shield was found to be effective in dose reduction without lowering the image quality.

CONCLUSION

We found that bismuth shields and lead goggles are suitable protective devices for the optimal reduction of lens doses.

Estimation of Patient Eye-Lens Dose During Neuro-Interventional Procedures using a Dense Neural Network (DNN)

The patient's eye-lens dose changes for each projection view during fluoroscopically-guided neuro-interventional procedures. Monte-Carlo (MC) simulation can be done to estimate lens dose but MC cannot be done in real-time to give feedback to the interventionalist. Deep learning (DL) models were investigated to estimate patient-lens dose for given exposure conditions to give real-time updates. MC simulations were done using a Zubal computational phantom to create a dataset of eye-lens dose values for training the DL models. Six geometric parameters (entrance-field size, LAO gantry angulation, patient x, y, z head position relative to the beam isocenter, and whether patient's right or left eye) were varied for the simulations. The dose for each combination of parameters was expressed as lens dose per entrance air kerma (mGy/Gy). Geometric parameter combinations associated with high-dose values were sampled more finely to generate more high-dose values for training purposes. Additionally, dose at intermediate parameter values was calculated by MC in order to validate the interpolation capabilities of DL. Data was split into training, validation and testing sets. Stacked models and median algorithms were implemented to create more robust models. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The goal for this DL model is that it be implemented into the Dose Tracking System (DTS) developed by our group. This would allow the DTS to infer the patient's eye-lens dose for real-time feedback and eliminate the need for a large database of pre-calculated values with interpolation capabilities.

Investigating the parameters that affect the radiation exposure and establishing typical values based on procedure complexity for cerebral angiography and brain aneurysm embolization

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the parameters that affect the radiation exposure and to establish typical values (TV) based on procedure complexity for cerebral angiography (CA) and brain aneurysm embolization (BAE).

METHODS

Clinical parameters and exposure data were retrospectively reviewed for 348 examinations performed between March 2016 and December 2019 at a single specialized neuroradiology center. TV were derived as the median value of the distribution of exposure parameters such as total air kerma area product (P_KA,T), air kerma at the patient entrance reference point, fluoroscopy time, and number of frames. A statistical analysis was conducted to investigate the exposure variability with patient's gender, number of treated vessels during CA and patient gender, aneurysm location and dimension, and treatment strategies during BAE.

RESULTS

Patient gender was associated with a significant increase in the exposure level for both CA and BAE. For CA, TV were in term of P_KA,T of 52 Gycm² for male vs. 28 Gycm² for female patients. For BAE, these were 113 Gycm² for male vs. 75 Gycm² for female patients. Exposure levels increased significantly with the number of treated vessels in CA. TV were 20 Gycm² for one vessel vs. 77 Gycm² for 5-6 vessels CA. For BAE, aneurysm location was also a key factor that affects the patient exposure. TV were 55 Gycm² for aneurysms grouped in location 1 vs. 105 Gycm² for those grouped in location 2.

CONCLUSION

Male gender, number of treated vessels, and aneurysm location are key parameters affecting patient exposure during CA and BAE procedures.

Unintended and Accidental Exposures, Significant Dose Events and Trigger Levels in Interventional Radiology

Over recent years, an increasing number of fluoroscopically guided interventions (FGIs) have been performed by radiologists and non-radiologists. Also, the number of complex interventional procedures has increased. In the late nineties, first reports of skin injuries appeared in the literature. The medical community responded through increased awareness for radiation protection and public authorities by recommendations and legislation, for example, the European Basic Safety Standards (EU-BSS) which were published in 2014, or the international Basic Safety Standards (BSS). Implementation of the EU-BSS requires concerted action from interventionalists, radiographers, medical physics experts and competent national authorities. Interventionalists should play an important role in this project since implementation of the EU-BSS will affect their daily practice. This paper discusses some important issues of the EU-BSS such as unintended and accidental radiation exposures of patients, the meaning of significant dose events and how to deal with patients who were exposed to a substantial radiation dose with the risk of tissue injuries. In addition, this paper provides practical advice on how to implement alert and trigger levels in daily practice of FGIs in order to increase patient safety.

Radiation protection of operators and patients in a hybrid Angio-MR suite

This work investigates the patient eye lens dose and x-ray scatter to the operator expected for a proposed hybrid Angio-MR concept. Two geometries were simulated for comparative assessment: a standard C-arm device for neuro-angiography applications and an innovative hybrid Angio-MR system concept, proposed by Siemens Healthineers. The latter concept is based on an over-couch x-ray tube and a detector inside an MRI system, with the aim of allowing combined, simultaneous MRI and x-ray imaging for procedures such as neurovascular interventions (including x-ray fluoroscopy and angiography imaging, 3D imaging, diffusion, and perfusion). To calculate the scattered radiation dose to the physician, Monte Carlo simulations were performed. Dose estimates of simplified models of the brain and eyes of both the patient and the physician and of the physician's torso and legs have been calculated. A number of parameters were varied in the simulation including x-ray spectrum, field of view (FOV), x-ray tube angulation, presence of shielding material and position of the physician. Additionally, 3D dose distributions were calculated in the vertical and horizontal planes in both setups. The patient eye lens dose was also calculated using a detailed voxel phantom and measured by means of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) to obtain a more accurate estimate. Assuming the same number of x-rays and the same size of the irradiated area on the patient's head, the results show a significant decrease in the scattered radiation to the physician for the Angio-MR system, while large increases, depending on setup, are expected to patient eye lens dose.

ESTIMATION OF PATIENT LENS DOSE ASSOCIATED WITH C-ARM CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY USAGE DURING INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY

The purpose of this study was to investigate the dose distribution and lens doses associated with C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), using a head phantom, and to estimate the contribution ratio of C-arm CBCT to each patient's lens dose during interventional neuroradiology ('lens dose ratio') in 109 clinical cases. In the phantom study, the peak skin doses and respective right and left lens doses of C-arm CBCT were as follows: 63.0 ± 1.9 mGy, 19.7 ± 1.4 mGy and 21.9 ± 0.8 mGy in whole brain C-arm CBCT and 39.2 ± 1.4 mGy, 4.7 ± 0.9 mGy and 3.6 ± 0.3 mGy in high-resolution C-arm CBCT. In the clinical study, the lens dose ratios were 25.4 ± 8.7% in the right lens and 19.1 ± 9.8% in the left lens. This study shows that, on average, ~25% of patients' total lens dose was contributed by C-arm CBCT.

VirtualDose-IR: a cloud-based software for reporting organ doses in interventional radiology

A cloud-based software, VirtualDose-IR (Virtual Phantoms Inc., Albany, New York, USA), designed to report organ doses and effective doses for a diverse patient population from interventional radiology (IR) procedures has been developed and tested. This software is based on a comprehensive database of Monte Carlo-generated organ dose built with a set of 21 anatomically realistic patient phantoms. The patient types included in this database are both male and female people with different ages reflecting reference adults, obese people with different BMIs and pregnant women at different gestational stages. Selectable parameters such as patient type, tube voltage, filtration thickness, beam direction, field size, and irradiation site are also considered in VirtualDose-IR. The software has been implemented using the 'Software as a Service (SaaS)' delivery concept permitting simultaneous multi-user, multi-platform access without requiring local installation. The patient doses resulting from different target sites and patient populations were reported using the VirtualDose-IR system. The patient doses under different source to surface distances (SSD) and beam angles calculated by VirtualDose-IR and Monte Carlo simulations were compared. For most organs, the dose differences between VirtualDose-IR results and Monte Carlo results were less than 0.3 mGy at 15 000 mGy * cm2 kerma-area product (KAP). The organ dose results were compared with measurement data previously reported in literatures. The doses to organs that were located within the irradiation field match closely with experimental measurement data. The differences in the effective dose values between calculated using VirtualDose-IR and those measured were less than 2.5%. The dose errors of most organs between VirtualDose-IR and literature results were less than 40%. These results validate the accuracy of organ doses reported by VirtualDose-IR. With the inclusion of pre-specified clinical IR examination parameters (such as beam direction, target location, field of view and beam quality) and the latest anatomically realistic patient phantoms in Monte Carlo simulations, VirtualDose-IR provides users with accurate dose information in order to systematically compare, evaluate, and optimize IR plans.

Subjective and objective evaluation of image quality in biplane cerebral digital subtraction angiography following significant acquisition dose reduction in a clinical setting

OBJECTIVE

Different technical and procedural methods have been introduced to develop low radiation dose protocols in neurointerventional examinations. We investigated the feasibility of minimizing radiation exposure dose by simply decreasing the detector dose during cerebral DSA and evaluated the comparative level of image quality using both subjective and objective methods.

METHODS

In a prospective study of patients undergoing diagnostic cerebral DSA, randomly selected vertebral arteries (VA) and/or internal carotid arteries and their contralateral equivalent arteries were injected. Detector dose of 3.6 and 1.2 μGy/frame were selected to acquire standard dose (SD) and low dose (LD) images, respectively. Subjective image quality assessment was performed by two neurointerventionalists using a 5 point scale. For objective image quality evaluation, circle of Willis vessels were categorized into conducting, primary, secondary, and side branch vessels. Two blinded observers performed arterial diameter measurements in each category. Only image series obtained from VA injections opacifying the identical posterior intracranial circulation were utilized for objective assessment.

RESULTS

No significant difference between SD and LD images was observed in subjective and objective image quality assessment in 22 image series obtained from 10 patients. Mean reference air kerma and kerma area product were significantly reduced by 61.28% and 61.24% in the LD protocol, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the necessity for reconsidering radiation dose protocols in neurointerventional procedures, especially at the level of baseline factory settings.