Fate of Coiled Aneurysms with Minor Recanalization at 6 Months: Rate of Progression to Further Recanalization and Related Risk Factors

The white-collar sign after Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms

PURPOSE

Although stent-assisted technique is expected to help provide a scaffold for neointima formation at the orifice of the aneurysm, not all aneurysms treated with stent-assisted technique develop complete neointima formation. The white-collar sign (WCS) indicates neointimal tissue formation at the aneurysm neck that prevents aneurysm recanalization. The aim of this study was to explore factors related to WCS appearance after stent-assisted coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs).

METHODS

A total of 59 UIAs treated with a Neuroform Atlas stent were retrospectively analyzed. The WCS was identified on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) 1 year after coil embolization. The cohort was divided into WCS-positive and WCS-negative groups, and possible predictors of the WCS were explored using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The WCS appeared in 20 aneurysms (33.9%). In the WCS-positive group, neck size was significantly smaller (4.2 (interquartile range (IQR): 3.8-4.6) versus 5.4 (IQR: 4.2-6.8) mm, p = .006), the VER was significantly higher (31.8% (IQR: 28.6%-38.4%) versus 27.6% (IQR: 23.6%-33.8%), p = .02), and the rate of RROC class 1 immediately after treatment was significantly higher (70% vs 20.5%, p < .001) than in the WCS-negative group. On multivariate analysis, neck size (odds ratio (OR): 0.542, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.308-0.954; p = .03) and RROC class 1 immediately after treatment (OR: 6.99, 95% CI: 1.769-27.55; p = .006) were independent predictors of WCS appearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Smaller neck size and complete occlusion immediately after treatment were significant factors related to WCS appearance in stent-assisted coil embolization for UIAs using the Neuroform Atlas stent.

Extended monitoring of re-coiled cerebral aneurysms after initial postcoiling recanalization: Safety and durability of repeat coil embolization

PURPOSE

In the endovascular era, postcoiling recanalization of cerebral aneurysms is occurring with greater frequency. Repeat coiling is usually done to prevent rebleeding, although long-term outcomes of re-embolization have yet to be adequately investigated. The present study was undertaken to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes of re-embolization in recanalized aneurysms, focusing on procedural safety, efficacy, and durability.

METHOD

In this retrospective review, we examined 308 patients with 310 recurrent aneurysms. All lesions were re-coiled, once major recanalization (after initial coil embolization) was established. Medical records and radiologic data amassed during extended follow-up were then subject to review. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was undertaken to identify risk factors for subsequent recurrence.

RESULT

During a lengthy follow-up (mean, 40.2 ± 33.0 months), major recanalization developed again in 87 aneurysms (28.1%). Multivariable Cox regression analysis linked re-recanalization to initial saccular neck width (p=.003) and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD; p<.001). Stent implantation (p=.038) and successful occlusion at second coiling (p=.012) were protective against later recanalization in this setting. The more recent the second embolization was performed, the lower the risk of further recurrence (p=.023). Procedure-related complications included asymptomatic thromboembolism (n = 9), transient ischemic neurologic deficits (n = 2), procedural bleeding (n = 1), and coil migration (n = 1), but there were no residual effects or deaths.

CONCLUSION

Repeat coil embolization is a safe therapeutic option for recanalized cerebral aneurysms. Wide-necked status and ADPKD emerged as risks for subsequent recanalization, whereas successful occlusion and stent implantation seemed to reduce the likelihood of recurrence after re-embolization procedures.

Progression from Early Minor Recanalization to Major Recanalization in Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms After Successful Coil Embolization: Risk Factors and Proposal of a Novel Predicting Variable

BACKGROUND

The risk factors for the progression from early minor recanalization to major recanalization are not well established. Herein, we evaluated ruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs) with minor recanalization within 1 year of coiling and their progression to major recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our database of coiled IAs and searched for ruptured saccular IAs that were successfully embolized without residual sacs. We selected IAs with minor recanalization confirmed on radiological studies within 1 year of coil embolization. All the IA cases had a follow-up period longer than 36 months based on the radiological results.

RESULTS

Minor recanalization occurred in 45 IAs within 1 year of coil embolization. Among them, 14 IAs (31.1%) progressed to major recanalization, and 31 remained stable. Progression to major recanalization was detected 12 months after minor recanalization in 2 patients, 24 months in 7 patients, and 36 months in 5 patients. Moreover, the progression to major recanalization occurred more frequently in IAs at the posterior location (P = 0.024, odds ratio 11.20) and IAs with a proportional forced area > 9 mm2 (P = 0.002, odds ratio 17.13), which was a newly proposed variable in the present study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that approximately one third of the ruptured IAs with early minor recanalization after coiling progressed to major recanalization within 3 years. Physicians should focus on the progression of ruptured IAs from minor to major recanalization, especially those with a posterior circulation location and a proportional forced area >9 mm2.

Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for intracranial aneurysm of the anterior cerebral circulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The safety of extracranial–intracranial (EC–IC) bypass in the management of anterior circulation intracranial aneurysms (IAs) remains to be determined. This systematic review aims to summarize the existing evidence and provide guidance for the precise management of IAs.

Data source

We constructed search strategies and comprehensively searched Pubmed, Medline, Embase, Web of science, and Cochrane library.

Methods

This systematic review was actualized according to the PRISMA statement. We evaluated study quality using the methodological index for non-randomized study (MINORS). Effect sizes were pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the I2 test. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger's test. The registration number for this systematic review is CRD42023396730.

Result

This systematic review included a total of 21 articles, involving 915 patients. Postoperative bypass patency rate was 99% (95% CI 0.98–1.00); short-term follow-up was 98% (95% CI 0.94–1.00); long-term follow-up was 95% (95% CI 0.93–0.97). The long-term follow-up occlusion rate of saphenous vein was higher than that of radial artery (OR 6.10 95% CI 1.04–35.59). Short-term surgery-related mortality was 0.3% (95% CI 0.000–0.012); long-term follow-up was 0.4% (95% CI 0.000–0.013); The proportion of patients with a score of 0–2 on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) during long-term follow-up was 92% (95% CI 0.86–0.98). The incidence rates of long-term follow-up complications were: ischemic 3% (95% CI 0.01–0.06); hemorrhagic 1% (95% CI 0.00–0.03); neurological deficit 1% (95% CI 0.00–0.03); other 3% (95% CI 0.01–0.06).

Limitation

Most of the included studies were retrospective studies. Studies reporting preoperative status were not sufficient to demonstrate postoperative improvement. Lack of sufficient subgroup information such as aneurysm rupture status.

Conclusion

EC–IC therapy for anterior circulation IAs has a high safety profile. Higher level of evidence is still needed to support clinical decision.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023396730, identifier: CRD42023396730.

Risk factors of recurrence after endovascular embolization of posterior communicating artery aneurysms

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk factors for recurrence after endovascular embolization of posterior communicating artery aneurysms (PcomA).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 163 patients harboring 172 PocmAs who were treated with endovascular embolization from January 2019 to December 2020. The patients were divided into recurrence and stable groups depending on outcome. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the potential risk factors of recurrence during follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the total 163 patients harboring 172 aneurysms, 107 were treated with simple coil occlusion and 65 were treated with stent-assisted coil embolization. There were significant differences in aneurysm sizes and use of non-stent-assisted coil embolizations between the groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of saccular aneurysm and Raymond grade were significantly higher in the recurrent group than in the stable group (P < 0.01). After variable selection, Raymond grade, aneurysm size, saccular aneurysm and non-stent-assisted coil embolization were included in further analysis. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed significant associations with non-stent-assisted coil embolization (P = 0.007), packing density (P < 0.001) and Raymond grades II (P < 0.001) and III (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Non-stent-assisted coil embolization, as well as packing density and Raymond grades II grade III are associated with recurrence after endovascular treatment of PcomA.

Microsurgical clipping versus newer endovascular techniques in treatment of unruptured anterior communicating artery-complex aneurysms: a meta-analysis and systematic review

The aim of this study is to compare occlusion rate, complication rate, and clinical outcome of microsurgical clipping (MC) and advanced endovascular techniques (EVT) in unruptured anterior communicating artery-complex aneurysms (ACoCAs). We reviewed the scientific literature reporting occlusion rate, time of occlusion assessment, and clinical outcome of MC and EVT in patients with unruptured ACoCAs, from January 2009 to December 2019. We included in our analysis 25 studies and 872 patients with unruptured ACoCAs (434 treated with endovascular techniques and 438 with MC). Ninety-three (10.7%), 320 (36.7%), 21 (2.4%), and 438 (50.2%) were treated with flow diverter (FD), stent-assisted coiling (SAC), endosaccular devices (ES), and microsurgical clipping (MC) respectively. FD, SAC, ES, and MC subgroups presented minor complications in 11.8%, 3.8%, 14.3%, and 7.1% of cases (p=.016), and major complications in 3.2%, 4.4%, 0%, and 7.1% (p=.136) of patients. A total occlusion rate post-treatment has been achieved in 4.3%, 87.1%, 47.6%, and 98.2% of cases (p=.000), while at 12 months' follow-up in 50%, 66%, 83.3%, and 80% of patients (p=.001). FD, SAC, ES, and MC subgroups had a good clinical outcome at 12 months in 93.5%, 90.5%, 100%, and 67.8% of cases. MC is associated with higher post-treatment total occlusion rate, but higher complication and lower good clinical outcome rates. EVT are promising in treating unruptured anterior cerebral artery aneurysms with high margin of safety and good clinical outcome, despite the lower total occlusion rate.

Risk factors for recanalization of dense coil packing for unruptured cerebral aneurysms in endovascular coil embolization: Analysis of a single center's experience

In coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms, inadequate packing is known to increase the probability of recanalization. Even tightly embolized aneurysms may be recanalized, but predictive factors for recanalization have not been fully investigated. This retrospective study aimed to identify risk factors for recanalization of treated aneurysms with a volume embolization ratio (VER) ≥ 25%. A total of 301 unruptured aneurysms in 248 patients who underwent coil embolization between March 2012 and January 2021 were analyzed. Cases involving dissecting aneurysm, intraluminal thrombosis, parent artery occlusion, intraoperative rupture, re-treatment, rupture the day after surgery, postoperative coil migration, and postoperative parent artery occlusion were excluded due to the inaccuracy of VER. A total of 105 aneurysms (34.9%) treated with VER ≥ 25% were extracted. Clinical features (age, sex, medical history, family history), anatomical features (shape, location, aneurysm size, inflow angle, and volume), procedural features (stent-assisted, Raymond-Roy occlusion classification [RROC] immediately after treatment, re-treatment rate), and follow-up period were compared between Recanalization and Non-recanalization groups. Predictors of recanalization were determined using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Eleven aneurysms were recanalized. In multivariate analysis, RROC class 3 (odds ratio [OR] 11.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-59.4) and aneurysm volume (OR 1.005; 95%CI 1.001-1.008) were independent predictors of recanalization. ROC curve analysis showed optimal cutoff values for aneurysm volume of 69.5 mm³ (sensitivity, 81.8%; specificity, 72.3%). In coil embolization of unruptured aneurysms that VER ≥ 25%, cases with RROC class 3 or high aneurysm volume may be associated with a higher risk of recanalization, and should be carefully followed-up.

Outcomes following aneurysmal coil embolization with intentionally shortened low-profile visible intraluminal support stent deployment

PURPOSE

Among all stents available for neuroendovascular therapy, the low-profile visible intraluminal support stent bears the highest metal coverage ratio. We deployed a low-profile visible intraluminal support stent with a delivery wire or/and microcatheter system push action to shorten the low-profile visible intraluminal support stent and thus achieve a flow diversion effect. We report our single-institution experience with the use of low-profile visible intraluminal support stents for intentionally shortened deployment (shortening group) and non-shortened deployment (non-shortening group) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 130 patients with 131 intracranial aneurysms who were treated with low-profile visible intraluminal support stent-assisted coil embolization from February 2016-January 2019. All perioperative complications were noted. Every 6 months, we re-examined the patients with cerebral angiography or magnetic resonance angiography. The outcomes of aneurysm occlusion were evaluated by the modified Raymond-Roy occlusion classification. We used the finite element method and computational fluid dynamics to investigate the hemodynamics after shortened low-profile visible intraluminal support stent deployment.

RESULTS

Immediately after treatment, the modified Raymond-Roy occlusion classification was significantly better in the shortening group than in the non-shortening group (p<0.05). The latest angiographic outcomes showed the same tendency. Hemodynamic analysis by computational fluid dynamics suggested an adequate flow diversion effect with the use of our intentional shortening method.

CONCLUSIONS

Stent-assisted coil embolization using this technique showed good results of a high complete occlusion rate and low complication rate. These findings suggest that shortened low-profile visible intraluminal support stent deployment yields a flow diversion effect and may lead to early intra-aneurysmal thrombus formation.

The different recanalization rates of posterior communicating artery aneurysms with a fetal posterior communicating artery and anterior communicating artery aneurysms with a variation of the unilateral A1 segment

BACKGROUND

Posterior communicating artery (PcomA) aneurysms are more likely to recanalize than anterior communicating artery (AcomA) aneurysms. However, it is still unclear whether the recanalization rate of these aneurysms is a result of involvement from the fetal posterior cerebral artery (fPCA) in PcomA aneurysms and variation of the unilateral A1 segment in AcomA aneurysms. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the different recanalization rates between PcomA aneurysms with fPCA and AcomA aneurysms with a variation of the unilateral A1 segment.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected information regarding 214 patients, each with communicating segment aneurysms between January 2013 and January 2020. Follow-up documentation on clinical and imaging data was comparatively analyzed between variant types, and recanalization rates of the variant and normal types were analyzed by stratification.

RESULTS

Of the 84 variant-type aneurysms (PcomA with fPCA and AcomA with a variation of the unilateral A1 segment, 41/43), complete recanalization occurred in 23 patients (27.4%), and it was significantly more likely to occur in PcomA aneurysms with fPCA (39.1%) than in AcomA aneurysms with a variation of the unilateral A1 segment (16.3%). Stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) has been shown to reduce recanalization (OR =0.092, 95% CI: 0.011 to 0.790, P=0.03). Additionally, variant types and the normal type (non-fetal, 106, and bilateral A1 symmetry, 24) have different odds ratios (OR) of recanalization (P=0.04), and the OR of the variant subtypes was significant, unlike the normal type (P=0.49).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that PcomA aneurysms with fPCA are more likely to recanalize than AcomA aneurysms with a variation of the unilateral A1 segment.

Risk Factors for Recanalization after Coil Embolization

The aim of our study was to identify risk factors for recanalization 6 months after coil embolization using clinical data followed by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis. Methods: Firstly, clinical data of 184 patients treated with coil embolization were analyzed retrospectively. Secondly, aneurysm models for high/low recanalization risk were generated based on ROC curves and their cut-off points. Afterward, CFD was utilized to validate the results. Results: In multivariable analysis, aneurysm filling during the first embolization was an independent risk factor whilst packing density was a protective factor of recanalization after 6 months in patients with aSAH. For patients with unruptured aneurysms, packing density was found to be a protective factor whilst the aneurysm neck size was an independent risk factor. Complex flow pattern and multiple vortices were associated with aneurysm shape and were characteristic of the high recanalization risk group. Conclusions: Statistical analysis suggested that there are various factors influencing recanalization risk. Once certain values of morphometric parameters are exceeded, a complex flow with numerous vortices occurs. This phenomenon was revealed due to CFD investigations that validated our statistical research. Thus, the complex flow pattern itself can be treated as a relevant recanalization predictor.

Recurrence and risk factors of posterior communicating artery aneurysms after endovascular treatment

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment (EVT) of posterior communicating artery aneurysms (PcomA) is challenging because of posterior communicating artery (Pcom) architecture. Additionally, these aneurysms have a high risk of recanalization compared with those located elsewhere.

METHODS

The radiographic findings of 171 patients treated with EVT at two institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, and subgroup analyses were performed based on Pcom characteristics.

RESULTS

Recanalization of PcomAs occurred in 53 patients (30.9%). Seven patients (4.0%) were retreated (six endovascularly and one with microsurgical clipping). The mean follow-up duration was 27.7 months (range: 3.5-78.6). The maximum diameter (odds ratio [OR] 1.23, P = .006, 95% CI 1.07-1.44), a Raymond-Roy classification of grade II or III (OR 2.26, P = .03, 95% CI 1.08-4.82), and the presence of reinforcement (balloon or/and stent, OR 0.44, P = .03, 95% CI 0.20-0.91) were associated with recanalization using multivariate logistic regression. Significant differences were found in maximum aneurysm diameter (P = .03) between normal- and fetal-type Pcoms on analysis of variance.

CONCLUSIONS

The recanalization rate of PcomAs after EVT was 30.9%; the retreatment rate was 4.0%. Maximum diameter, Raymond-Roy classification, and presence of reinforcement were significantly associated with recanalization but not associated with fetal-type Pcom. Aneurysm size was larger in patients with a fetal-type Pcom than in those with a normal Pcom. Pcom size was not related to recanalization rate.

Retreatment With Flow Diverters and Coiling for Recurrent Aneurysms After Initial Endovascular Treatment: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis

Background: Flow diverters and conventional coiling are established modalities for the retreatment of intracranial recurrent aneurysms after initial endovascular treatment. We aimed to compare the efficacy of these techniques. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data for patients with recurrent aneurysms after initial endovascular treatment retreated in our center with either a pipeline embolization device (PED) or conventional coil embolization from January 2012 to July 2020. We performed 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) using the nearest neighbor method. We controlled for: initial treatment strategy, aneurysm size, neck diameter, symptom presentation, history of aneurysm rupture, age, sex, fusiform-dissecting aneurysm, bifurcation aneurysm, and aneurysm location. The clinical and morphological factors of all patients at initial treatment and the angiographic and clinical results at the second treatment were collected and compared between the propensity-matched pairs. Results: A total of 105 intracranial aneurysms were identified; 18 patients (17.1%) were treated with a PED, and 87 (82.9%) were treated via conventional coil embolization. PSM resulted in 12 matched pairs (12 patients in the PED group and 24 in the coiling group). There was no significant difference of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications between the groups, the obliteration rate of branches covered by stent, or modified Rankin Scale scores at the last clinical follow-up. Importantly, the retreatment strategy in the PED group provided significantly different results vs. the coiling group (P < 0.001), with a lower recurrence rate (0.0 vs. 29.2%, respectively; P = 0.037). However, the procedural failure rate and the parent artery stenosis were more frequently in PED group compared with coiling group (both were 16.7 vs. 0.0%; P = 0.040). Conclusions: Endovascular retreatment for recurrent aneurysms after initial endovascular treatment might be safe and effective. Flow diverters might be associated with reduced risk of recanalization and an increased risk of procedural failure and mild parent artery stenosis.

Predictors of Cerebral Aneurysm Rupture after Coil Embolization: Single-Center Experience with Recanalized Aneurysms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recanalization after coil embolization is widely studied. However, there are limited data on how recanalized aneurysms rupture. Herein, we describe our experience with the rupture of recanalized aneurysms and discuss the type of recanalized aneurysms at greatest rupture risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 426 unruptured aneurysms and 169 ruptured aneurysms underwent coil embolization in our institution between January 2009 and December 2017. Recanalization occurred in 38 (8.9%) of 426 unruptured aneurysms (unruptured group) and 37 (21.9%) of 169 ruptured aneurysms (ruptured group). The Modified Raymond-Roy classification on DSA was used to categorize the recanalization type. Follow-up DSA was scheduled until 6 months after treatment, and follow-up MRA was scheduled yearly. If recanalization was suspected on MRA, DSA was performed.

RESULTS

In the unruptured group, the median follow-up term was 74.0 months. Retreatment for recanalization was performed in 18 aneurysms. Four of 20 untreated recanalized aneurysms (0.94% of total coiled aneurysms) ruptured. In untreated recanalized aneurysms, class IIIb aneurysms ruptured significantly more frequently than class II and IIIa (P = .025). In the ruptured group, the median follow-up term was 28.0 months. Retreatment for recanalization was performed in 16 aneurysms. Four of 21 untreated recanalized aneurysms (2.37% of total coiled aneurysms) ruptured. Class IIIb aneurysms ruptured significantly more frequently than class II and IIIa (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

The types of recanalization after coil embolization may be predictors of rupture. Coiled aneurysms with class IIIb recanalization should undergo early retreatment because of an increased rupture risk.

Delayed Progression to Major Recanalization in Coiled Aneurysms with Minor Recanalization at 36-Month Follow-up : Incidence and Related Risk Factors

PURPOSE

The aim was to monitor aneurysms that show imaging evidence of minor recanalization 36 months after coil embolization and to determine the rate and related risk factors of major recanalization during more prolonged observation.

METHODS

A total of 54 patients with 55 aneurysms showing minor recanalization at 36-month follow-up imaging between 2011 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Medical records and radiological data accumulating in the course of extended monitoring (mean 83.9 ± 21.5 months) were assessed. Incidence and average annual risk of progression to major recanalization were then calculated. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were applied to determine possible risk factors for progression to major recanalization.

RESULTS

In the 55 aneurysms studied 26 showed sustained minor recanalization since month 6 of follow-up, whereas minor recanalization of 29 completely occluded coiled lesions appeared in follow-up images after 6-24 months. Only 8 coiled aneurysms (14.5%) with minor recanalization at 36 months progressed to major recanalization during 219.3 aneurysm-years of observation (3.6% per aneurysm-year), 2 surfacing within 72 months and 6 developing thereafter. Additional embolization was performed in six of these patients. By multivariate analysis, no clinical or anatomic factors were statistically linked to such progression, but younger age showed marginal significance (hazard ratio, HR = 1.076; p = 0.099).

CONCLUSION

Most coiled aneurysms (85.5%) showing minor recanalization at 36 months postembolization proved to be stable in extended observation. Given the low probability but seriousness of delayed major recanalization, careful monitoring is still warranted in this setting but at less frequent intervals (every 2-3 years) beyond 36 months.

Does Systemic Hypertension Impact Recanalization of Coiled Aneurysms?

PURPOSE

It is well known that hypertension is a significant factor in the formation, growth, and rupture of aneurysms and recanalization of coiled aneurysms is affected by hemodynamic stress. At present, however, the impact of hypertension on recanalization of coiled aneurysms has not been adequately investigated. This study examined the relation between hypertension and subsequent outcomes of coiled aneurysms, using a matched patient analysis.

METHODS

A total of 715 subjects undergoing coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms between 2011 and 2013 were selected for study. Time-of-flight magnetic resonance or conventional angiography was used (singly or together) to gauge degrees of occlusion after coiling, applying the Raymond classification in grading recanalization. Patients with hypertension were grouped as controlled or uncontrolled, based on blood pressure readings at outpatient clinics. Hypertensive and non-hypertensive subjects were matched (1:1) for several relevant variables.

RESULTS

Overall, 484 patients (67.7%) were hypertensive (controlled 338; uncontrolled 146). During the follow-up period (28.6 ± 9.7 months), 129 aneurysms (18.0%) displayed recanalization (minor 58; major 71). Patient age, concomitant diabetes, hyperlipidemia, aneurysm size, neck size, depth-to-neck ratio, and aneurysm type differed significantly in hypertensive and non-hypertensive groups; however, group incidences of cumulative recanalization were similar (p = 0.297). After 1:1 matching the cumulative recanalization rate (13.5%) in hypertensive and non-hypertensive counterparts (14.3%) again proved similar (p = 0.578). In the hypertensive group, in addition, recanalization showed no relation to controlled and uncontrolled subgroup (odds ratio, OR = 1.000, p > 0.999).

CONCLUSION

Unlike other aspects of evolving aneurysms (e.g. formation, growth, or rupture), recanalization of coiled aneurysms seems to be unaffected by systemic hypertension.

Determination of Aneurysm Volume Critical for Stability After Coil Embolization: A Retrospective Study of 3530 Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Recurrence is one of the concerns even after successful endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. We sought to determine the critical aneurysm volume and risk factors related to aneurysmal stability in patients undergoing coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

Aneurysm volume and follow-up imaging data were retrieved in 3042 patients with 3530 aneurysms who were treated with endovascular coil embolization from January 2006 to October 2016. We analyzed the anatomic outcome in relation to aneurysm volume and determined the critical aneurysm volume favoring coil embolization.

RESULTS

Recanalization rates were 2.8%, 6.3%, 19.4%, and 67.4% in each group with aneurysm volume of <10, 10-100, 100-1000, and >1000 mm³, respectively. When we investigated the 100-1000 mm³ group, the recanalization rate remarkably increased at 500 mm³ (16.4% vs. 57.5%, P < 0.0001; odds ratio [OR], 6.968; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.562-13.631). In the entire cohort, recanalization rates were significantly different between aneurysm volume of <500 and >500 mm³ (7.2% vs. 62.9%, respectively; P < 0.0001; OR, 21.848; 95% CI, 13.944-34.235). In aneurysm volumes of >500 mm³, the location was a significant prognostic factor for long-term stability (posterior circulation vs. anterior circulation; OR, 4.737; 95% CI, 1.275-17.602; P = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

In our series of cerebral aneurysms treated with coil embolization, 500 mm³ was found to be the critical volume determining stability after coil embolization. Large volume aneurysms in the posterior circulation were especially prone to recanalization after coiling.

Comparative analysis of coil embolization in posterior and anterior communicating artery aneurysms

Background

Recanalization rates after coil embolization are known to be higher in cerebral aneurysms of the posterior (vs anterior) circulation. Although often grouped with anterior lesions, aneurysms of the posterior communicating artery (PcoA) may nevertheless behave differently.

Objective

We performed a comparative analysis to explore differences in recanalization rates of PcoA and anterior communicating artery (AcoA) aneurysms, both integral to the circle of Willis.

Methods

Between October 2012 and July 2017, 699 AcoA (n=427) and PcoA (n=272) aneurysms were treated by endovascular coil embolization, monitoring 667 (95.4%) via radiologic imaging for ≥ 6 months. Cumulative recordings of medical and imaging data were retrospectively reviewed, conducting propensity score matching and binary logistic regression analysis.

Results

In the 667 aneurysms followed longer term, recanalization occurred in 111 (16.6%; minor 72; major 39) and was significantly more frequent in PcoA (25.5%) than in AcoA (11.0%; P<0.01) aneurysms during similar follow-up periods. After 1:1 propensity score matching, an even greater proclivity for recanalization was evident at PcoA sites (PcoA 23.0%; AcoA 12.2%; P<0.01). Although A1 segment dominance was linked to recanalization in AcoA aneurysms (18.2% vs 7.6%; P=0.01), the PcoA counterpart had no bearing on recanalization (27.7% vs 24.1%; P=0.51).

Conclusions

Despite a clear preponderance of AcoA aneurysms, recanalization of PcoA aneurysms proved significantly greater, attesting to posterior circulation behavior.

Selective compromise of hypoplastic posterior communicating artery variants with aneurysms treatable by coil embolization: clinical and radiologic outcomes

Background

Posterior communicating artery (PcoA) compromise may serve as adjunctive treatment in patients with hypoplastic variants of PcoA who undergo coil embolization of PcoA aneurysms. However, procedural safety and the propensity for later recanalization are still unclear.

Objective

To evaluate clinical and radiologic outcomes of coil embolization in this setting, focusing on compromise of PcoA.

Methods

As a retrospective review, we examined 250 patients harboring 291 aneurysms of hypoplastic PcoAs, all consecutively treated by coil embolization between January 2004 and June 2016. PcoA compromise was undertaken in conjunction with 81 of the treated aneurysms (27.8%; incomplete 53; complete 28). Medical records and radiologic data were assessed during extended monitoring.

Results

During the mean follow-up of 33.9±24.6 months (median 36 months), a total of 107 (36.8%) coiled aneurysms showed recanalization (minor 50; major 57). Recanalization rates were as follows: PcoA preservation 40.5% (85/210); incomplete PcoA occlusion 34.0% (18/53); complete PcoA occlusion 14.3% (4/28). Aneurysms >7 mm (HR 3.40; P<0.01), retreatment for recanalization (HR 3.23; P<0.01), and compromise of PcoA (P<0.01) emerged from multivariate analysis as significant risk factors for recanalization. Compared with PcoA preservation, complete PcoA compromise conferred more favorable outcomes (HR 0.160), whereas incomplete compromise of PcoA fell short of statistical significance. Thromboembolic infarction related to PcoA compromise did not occur in any patient.

Conclusion

PcoA compromise in conjunction with coil embolization of PcoA aneurysms appears safe in hypoplastic variants of PcoA, helping to prevent recanalization if complete occlusion is achieved.

Stent-assisted coil embolization of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: safety, effectiveness, and risk factors for procedural complications or recanalization

INTRODUCTION

Stent-assisted coil (SAC) embolization is an alternative treatment option for anterior communicating artery (AcoA) aneurysms. This study was undertaken to assess the safety and effectiveness of SAC embolization in treating AcoA aneurysms and to determine risk factors for related procedural complications or recanalization.

METHODS

Between August 2008 and December 2016, 184 patients with AcoA aneurysms were treated with SAC embolization. Cumulative medical record and radiologic data were analyzed using binary logistic regression to identify factors predisposing to procedural complications or recanalization.

RESULTS

Contralateral A1 segment hypoplasia was observed in 59 patients (32.1%). Three types of stents (LVIS, Enterprise, and Neuroform) were variably placed by one of two routes: (1) ipsilateral A1 to ipsilateral A2 (75.5%) or (2) ipsilateral A1 to contralateral A2 (24.5%). Procedural complications occurred in 17 patients (thromboembolism 12; procedural leakage 3; both 2), showing a significant relation to subarachnoid hemorrhage at presentation (OR 57.750; P<0.01). Occlusion was documented immediately after embolization in 130 aneurysms (70.6%) and, in 23 (13.1%) of 175 AcoA aneurysms followed by angiography (median 25.9±18.5 months), recanalization developed (minor, 15; major, 8). Stent configuration (ipsilateral A1 to contralateral A2, P=0.024), maximum aneurysm size (>7 mm, P<0.01), and A1 segment hypoplasia (P=0.039) were identified as risk factors for recanalization.

CONCLUSION

SAC embolization is a safe and effective method of treating unruptured AcoA aneurysms, regardless of anatomic or clinical features. However, in the event of rupture, procedural complications are likely. Stent configuration, aneurysm size, and A1 segment hypoplasia were identified as significant risk factors for recanalization.

Follow-Up Outcomes After Re-Embolization for Recanalized Aneurysms After Initial Coiling: Further Recurrence Rates and Related Risk Factors

BACKGROUND

Although it is well known that coiled aneurysms can recanalize over time, long-term outcomes of re-embolization for recurred aneurysms have not been adequately investigated. We studied the retreatment outcomes of re-embolized aneurysms during follow-up monitoring and assessed the risk factors related to further recanalization.

METHODS

A total of 129 patients with 133 aneurysms were retrospectively reviewed. Each aneurysm was subjected to re-embolization because of major recanalization after initial coil embolization and underwent midterm and extended monitoring after retreatment. Cumulative medical records and radiologic data were assessed. Repeat recurrence rates and related risk factors were assessed by binary logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 47 aneurysms (35.3%) showed re-recanalization at 6 months after re-embolization, with 17 and 30 instances of minor and major recanalization, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that posterior circulation (hazard ratio [HR], 6.129; P = 0.010), large aneurysm (>7 mm) (HR, 13.598; P < 0.001), and incomplete occlusion at the second coiling (HR, 9.975; P = 0.001) were significant factors for repeat recanalization. Of 86 aneurysms showing complete occlusion at the midterm, 76 were further evaluated (≥12 months), showing 18 aneurysms (23.7%) of delayed re-recanalization during a follow-up of 230.1 aneurysm-years. Of 15 aneurysms with minor recanalization at 6 months, 6 (40.0%) progressed to major recanalization during a follow-up of 44.0 aneurysm-years.

CONCLUSIONS

Most re-coiled aneurysms (64.7%) showed complete occlusion at the 6-month follow-up. However, posterior circulation, large aneurysm (>7 mm), and incomplete occlusion at the second coiling were risks for further recanalization. The midterm and delayed re-recanalization rates of the re-embolized aneurysms seem to be higher than those of the initial aneurysms.

Progressive Occlusion of Small Saccular Aneurysms Incompletely Occluded After Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization : Analysis of Related Factors and Long-Term Outcomes

PURPOSE

Incompletely occluded aneurysms after coil embolization are subject to recanalization but occasionally progress to a totally occluded state. Deployed stents may actually promote thrombosis of coiled aneurysms. We evaluated outcomes of small aneurysms (<10 mm) wherein saccular filling with contrast medium was evident after stent-assisted coiling, assessing factors implicated in subsequent progressive occlusion.

METHODS

Between September 2012 and June 2016, a total of 463 intracranial aneurysms were treated by stent-assisted coil embolization. Of these, 132 small saccular aneurysms displayed saccular filling with contrast medium in the immediate aftermath of coiling. Progressive thrombosis was defined as complete aneurysmal occlusion at the 6‑month follow-up point. Rates of progressive occlusion and factors predisposing to this were analyzed via binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

In 101 (76.5%) of the 132 intracranial aneurysms, complete occlusion was observed in follow-up imaging studies at 6 months. Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that progressive occlusion was linked to smaller neck diameter (odds ratio [OR] = 1.533; p = 0.003), hyperlipidemia (OR = 3.329; p = 0.036) and stent type (p = 0.031). The LVIS stent is especially susceptible to progressive thrombosis, more so than Neuroform (OR = 0.098; p = 0.008) or Enterprise (OR = 0.317; p = 0.098) stents. In 57 instances of progressive thrombosis, followed for ≥12 months (mean 25.0 ± 10.7 months), 56 (98.2%) were stable, with minor recanalization noted once (1.8%) and no major recanalization.

CONCLUSION

Aneurysms associated with smaller diameter necks, hyperlipidemic states and LVIS stent deployment may be inclined to possible thrombosis, if occlusion immediately after stent-assisted coil embolization is incomplete. In such instances, excellent long-term durability is anticipated.

Risk Factor Analysis of Recanalization Timing in Coiled Aneurysms: Early versus Late Recanalization

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Long-term documentation of anatomic and angiographic characteristics pertaining to the timing of recanalization in coiled aneurysms has been insufficient. Our intent was to analyze and compare early and late-phase recanalization after coiling, identifying respective risk factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 870 coiled saccular aneurysms were monitored for extended periods (mean, 30.8 ± 8.3 months). Medical records and radiologic data were also reviewed, stratifying patients as either early (n = 128) or late (n = 52) recanalization or as complete occlusion (n = 690). Early recanalization was equated with confirmed recanalization within 6 months after the procedure, whereas late recanalization was defined as verifiable recanalization after imaging confirmation of complete occlusion at 6 months. A multinomial regression model served to assess potential risk factors, the reference point being early recanalization.

RESULTS

Posterior circulation (P = .009), subarachnoid hemorrhage at presentation (P = .011), second attempt for recanalized aneurysm (P < .001), and aneurysm size >7 mm (P < .001) emerged as variables significantly linked with early recanalization (versus complete occlusion). Late (versus early) recanalization corresponded with aneurysms ≤7 mm (P = .013), and in a separate subanalysis of lesions ≤7 mm, aneurysms 4-7 mm showed a significant predilection for late recanalization (P = .008). However, the propensity for complete occlusion in smaller lesions (≤7 mm) increased as the size diminished.

CONCLUSIONS

Although long-term complete occlusion after coiling was more likely in aneurysms ≤7 mm, such lesions were more prone to late (versus early) recanalization, particularly those of 4-7 mm in size. Long-term follow-up imaging is thus appropriate in aneurysms >4 mm to detect late recanalization of those formerly demonstrating complete occlusion.

A Single Center Experience with Coil Embolization for Cerebral Aneurysms Greater than 10 mm in the Internal Carotid Artery

We investigated endovascular treatment for 10 mm or larger aneurysms in the internal carotid artery (IC), including the cavernous portion, the paraclinoid portion, and the posterior communication artery (PC). Between 2011 and 2014 at our hospital, there were 35 cases of aneurysms that were 10 mm or larger in the carotid artery. We analyzed these 35 cases retrospectively based on the size and location of the aneurysms, method of treatment, number of coils implanted, use of a stent, complications, rupture after treatment, ophthalmologic symptoms, and need for re-treatment. There was no bleeding after treatment. Of the 35 cases, four cases (11%) had permanent complications. Re-treatment was indicated in 11 cases (31%), including eight cases localized in the paraclinoid portion, two cases in the IC-PC, and one case in the cavernous portion. Among these re-treatment cases, two cases required a third treatment. Of the 16 cases with paraclinoid aneurysms, half required re-treatment. Of the 12 cases with ophthalmologic symptoms prior to treatment, 9 (75%) improved or had no change and 3 (25%) became worse. There were no complications in the 13 re-treatment procedures. Re-treatment is not uncommon, and a scheduled follow-up is needed. Coil embolization has been one of the main options for aneurysms that are 10 mm or larger in the IC. In the future, these large aneurysms will be treated with a flow diverter stent (FD).