First-Line Use of Core Needle Biopsy for High-Yield Preliminary Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules

Educational exchange in thyroid core needle biopsy diagnosis: enhancing pathological interpretation through guideline integration and peer learning

BACKGROUND

While fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) plays an essential role in the screening of thyroid nodules, core needle biopsy (CNB) acts as an alternative method to address FNAC limitations. However, diagnosing thyroid CNB samples can be challenging due to variations in background and levels of experience. Effective training is indispensable to mitigate this challenge. We aim to evaluate the impact of an educational program on improving the accuracy of CNB diagnostics.

METHODS

The 2-week observational program included a host mentor pathologist with extensive experience and a visiting pathologist. The CNB classification by The Practice Guidelines Committee of the Korean Thyroid Association was used for the report. Two rounds of reviewing the case were carried out, and the level of agreement between the reviewers was analyzed.

RESULTS

The first-round assessment showed a concordance between two pathologists for 247 thyroid CNB specimens by 84.2%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.74 (indicating substantial agreement). This finding was attributed to the discordance in the use of categories III and V. After peer learning, the two pathologists evaluated 30 new cases, which showed an overall improvement in the level of agreement. The percentage of agreement between pathologists on thyroid CNB diagnosis was 86.7%, as measured by kappa coefficient of 0.80.

CONCLUSIONS

This educational program, consisting of guided mentorship and peer learning, can substantially enhance the diagnostic accuracy of thyroid CNB. It is useful in promoting consistent diagnostic standards and contributes to the ongoing development of global pathology practices.

Avoiding "Needless" nephrectomy: What is the role of small renal mass biopsy in 2024?

Current guidelines do not mandate routine preoperative renal mass biopsy (RMB) for small renal masses (SRMs), which results in a considerable rate (18%-26%) of needless nephrectomy/partial nephrectomy for benign renal tumors. In light of this ongoing practice, a narrative review was conducted to examine the role of routine RMB for SRM. First, arguments justifying the current non-biopsy approach to SRM are critically reviewed and contested. Second, as a standalone procedure, RMB is critically assessed; RMB was found to have higher sensitivity, specificity, and an equal or lower complication rate when compared with other commonly preoperatively biopsied solid organ tumors (e.g., breast, prostate, lung, pancreas, thyroid, and liver). Based on the foregoing information, we propose a paradigm shift in SRM management, advocating for an updated policy in which partial nephrectomy or nephrectomy for SRM invariably occurs only after a preoperative biopsy confirms that a SRM is indeed malignant.

Reevaluating diagnostic categories and associated malignancy risks in thyroid core needle biopsy

As the application of core needle biopsy (CNB) in evaluating thyroid nodules rises in clinical practice, the 2023 Korean Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Patients with Thyroid Nodules have officially recognized its value for the first time. CNB procures tissue samples preserving both histologic structure and cytologic detail, thereby supplying substantial material for an accurate diagnosis and reducing the necessity for repeated biopsies or subsequent surgical interventions. The current review introduces the risk of malignancy within distinct diagnostic categories, emphasizing the implications of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features on these malignancy risks. Prior research has indicated diagnostic challenges associated with follicular-patterned lesions, resulting in notable variation within indeterminate diagnostic categories. The utilization of mutation-specific immunostaining in CNB enhances the accuracy of lesion classification. This review underlines the essential role of a multidisciplinary approach in diagnosing follicular-patterned lesions and the potential of mutation-specific immunostaining to strengthen diagnostic consensus and inform patient management decisions.

Preoperative Risk Stratification of Follicular-patterned Thyroid Lesions on Core Needle Biopsy by Histologic Subtyping and RAS Variant-specific Immunohistochemistry

Follicular-patterned lesions often have indeterminate results (diagnostic category III or IV) by core needle biopsy (CNB) and fine needle aspiration (FNA). However, CNB diagnoses follicular neoplasm (category IV) more frequently than FNA. Therefore, we aimed to develop a risk stratification system for CNB samples with category III/IV using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The specificity of the RAS Q61R antibody was validated on 58 thyroid nodules with six different types of RAS genetic variants and 40 cases of RAS wild-type. We then applied IHC analysis of RAS Q61R to 207 CNB samples with category III/IV in which all patients underwent surgical resection. RAS Q61R IHC had 98% sensitivity and 98% specificity for detecting the RAS p.Q16R variant. In an independent dataset, the positive rate of RAS Q61R was significantly higher in NIFTP (48%) and malignancies (45%) than in benign tumors (19%). The risk of NIFTP/malignancy was highest in the group with nuclear atypia and RAS Q61R expression (86%) and lowest in the group without both parameters (32%). The high-risk group with either nuclear atypia or RAS Q61R had 67.3% sensitivity, 73.4% specificity, 75.2% positive predictive value, and 65.1% negative predictive value for identifying NIFTP/malignancy. We conclude that RAS Q61R IHC can be a rule-in diagnostic test for NIFTP/malignancy in CNB category III/IV results. Combining of the histologic parameter (nuclear atypia) with RAS Q61R IHC results can further stratify CNB category III/IV into a high-risk group, which is sufficient for a surgical referral, and a low-risk group sufficient for observation.

Cytopathologic criteria and size should be considered in comparison of fine-needle aspiration vs. core-needle biopsy for thyroid nodules: results based on large surgical series

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compared the diagnostic performances of FNA and CNB using various cytopathologic criteria and size subgroups to see how the comparison results differ accordingly.

METHODS

From May 2012 to May 2019, 8187 thyroid nodules in 8139 patients who had undergone preoperative US-guided FNA or CNB at outside clinics were included in this retrospective study (mean size: 11.9 ± 9.5 mm). Preoperative US-FNA was performed in 7496 (91.6%) nodules and US-CNB was performed in 691 (8.4%) nodules. Propensity score matching was used to compare the sensitivities between FNA and CNB in diagnosis of malignancy and neoplasm according to different cytologic test criteria.

RESULTS

Of the 8187 thyroid nodules, 7833 (95.7%) were malignant and 354 (4.3%) were benign. Mean size of the thyroid nodules in the CNB group was significantly larger than the FNA group, 15.7 ± 12.7 mm vs. 11.6 ± 9.0 mm, respectively (P < 0.001). After matching, sensitivity in the CNB group were significantly higher in the total population, and in subgroups <10 mm for criteria 1 and 2 (all P < 0.05, respectively). No significant differences were seen between the sensitivities of FNA and CNB for nodules ≥10 mm regardless of criteria in diagnosis of malignancy or neoplasm (all P > 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Results comparing sensitivities between FNA and CNB differ according to the different cytopathologic criteria used for calculation. CNB has significantly higher sensitivity to FNA in subcentimeter nodules when using criteria 1 or 2. Diagnostic sensitivities did not show significant differences for nodules ≥10 mm regardless of the cytopathologic criteria used, that should be considered in selecting biopsy methods.

[Effect of the hardness of thyroid nodules on sample satisfaction of core needle biopsy and fine needle aspiration]

Objective:To explore whether the hardness of thyroid nodule could affect the satisfaction of ultrasound-guided coarse and fine needle puncture, so as to choose the best puncture scheme. Method:Clinical data of 164 patients（164 nodes） undergoing ultrasound-guided thyroid nodule biopsy were collected. The conditions for selecting research objects were the nodules size ranging from 0.8 to 2.0 cm. The subjects were divided into group A （0-10%）, group B （>10% - 20%） and group C （> 20%） according to the deformation rate of ultrasound elastography （UE）. The sample satisfaction of Fine needle aspiration was based on the Bethesda classification, the sample satisfaction of core needle was based on visual observation. Result:Ultrasound-guided core and fine needle biopsy were performed on 164 nodules. the satisfaction of specimens of overall is 84.76% by the coarse needle and 63.41% by the fine needle. The satisfaction of specimens of groups in A1 group: 84.62%, A2 group: 64.10%, B1 group: 80.43%, B2 group: 52.17%, C1 group: 90.00%, C2 group: 75.00%, respectively. The differences of specimen satisfaction are statistically significant between A1 and A2 groups, and between B1 and B2 groups（P<0.05,respectively）. but not statistically significant between C1 and C2 groups（P>0.05）. Conclusion:The hardness of thyroid nodule can affect the satisfaction of puncture specimens under certain conditions. Combining with the results of ultrasound elastography, the clear assessment of the hardness of thyroid nodule can help to guide the selection of the best puncture scheme, so as to improve the satisfaction of puncture specimens.

Core-Needle Biopsy Does Not Show Superior Diagnostic Performance to Fine-Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Thyroid Nodules

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performances of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and core-needle biopsy (CNB) for thyroid nodules according to nodule size.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 320 thyroid nodules from 320 patients who underwent both FNA and CNB at outside clinics and proceeded with surgery in our institution between July 2012 and May 2019. According to nodule size, the diagnostic performances of FNA and CNB were calculated using various combinations of test-negatives and test-positives defined by the Bethesda categories and were compared using the generalized estimated equation and the Delong method.

RESULTS

There were 279 malignant nodules in 279 patients and 41 benign nodules in 41 patients. The diagnostic performance of FNA was mostly not different from CNB regardless of nodule size, except for negative predictive value, which was better for FNA than CNB when applying Criteria 1 and 2. When applying Criteria 3, the specificity and positive predictive value of FNA were superior to CNB regardless of size. When applying Criteria 4, diagnostic performance did not differ between FNA and CNB regardless of size. After applying Criteria 5, diagnostic performance did not differ between FNA and CNB in nodules ≥2 cm. However, in nodules ≥1 cm and all nodules, the sensitivity, accuracy, and negative predictive value of CNB were better than those of FNA.

CONCLUSION

CNB did not show superior diagnostic performance to FNA for diagnosing thyroid nodules.

2019 Practice guidelines for thyroid core needle biopsy: a report of the Clinical Practice Guidelines Development Committee of the Korean Thyroid Association

Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) has been increasingly used for the pre-operative diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Since the Korean Society of the Thyroid Radiology published the ‘Consensus Statement and Recommendations for Thyroid CNB’ in 2017 and the Korean Endocrine Pathology Thyroid CNB Study Group published ‘Pathology Reporting of Thyroid Core Needle Biopsy’ in 2015, advances have occurred rapidly not only in the management guidelines for thyroid nodules but also in the diagnostic terminology and classification schemes. The Clinical Practice Guidelines Development Committee of the Korean Thyroid Association (KTA) reviewed publications on thyroid CNB from 1995 to September 2019 and updated the recommendations and statements for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules using CNB. Recommendations for the resolution of clinical controversies regarding the use of CNB were based on expert opinion. These practical guidelines include recommendations and statements regarding indications for CNB, patient preparation, CNB technique, biopsy-related complications, biopsy specimen preparation and processing, and pathology interpretation and reporting of thyroid CNB.

Preoperative Diagnostic Categories of Noninvasive Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm with Papillary-Like Nuclear Features in Thyroid Core Needle Biopsy and Its Impact on Risk of Malignancy

This study was designed to evaluate the preoperative diagnostic categories of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) using thyroid core needle biopsy (CNB) and to analyze its impact on the risk of malignancy (ROM). A total of 2687 consecutive thyroid CNBs were reviewed retrospectively and classified into six diagnostic categories using a standardized reporting system similar to the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Diagnostic categories of CNBs were compared with the final surgical diagnoses, and the ROM in each category was calculated both before and after excluding NIFTP from malignancy. Of 946 surgically resected cases, 683 were diagnosed as papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), and 32 (4.7% of PTC) were reclassified as NIFTP. The CNB diagnostic categories of NIFTP were as follows: follicular neoplasm in 20 (62.5%; 14, with nuclear atypia), indeterminate lesion in 11 (34.4%), and suspicious for malignancy in one (3.1%). When combined, NIFTP and encapsulated follicular variant of PTC (EFVPTC) were more often categorized as follicular neoplasm compared with other PTC variants including infiltrative FVPTC. Exclusion of NIFTP from malignant diagnosis led to a significant decrease in the ROM in follicular neoplasm with nuclear atypia category. Thus, thyroid CNB enables to differentiate NIFTP/EFVPTC from other PTCs, providing a useful guide for optimal treatment in patients with these tumors.

Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of large thyroid nodules: Core needle biopsy yields more reliable results than fine needle aspiration

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare the false negative rate, sensitivity and false positive rate of ultrasound (US)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) with those of US-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) for large thyroid nodules ≥2.0 cm, which reportedly have an increased risk of thyroid malignancy.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied surgically confirmed thyroid nodules that had preoperative US-guided FNA or CNB between March 2005 and December 2013. We reviewed nodule size, sonographic features, cytohistologic results, and final surgical pathology. We assessed false negative rates, sensitivity, and false positive rates by biopsy method and nodule size for diagnosis of thyroid malignancy. We assessed complications for procedures.

RESULTS

US-guided CNB showed better diagnostic performance, in terms of lower false negative rates and greater sensitivity, than US-guided FNA in large thyroid nodules. There was no significant difference in false positive rate according to biopsy methods in large thyroid nodules. The false negative rates of large thyroid nodules (≥2.0 cm) were higher than those of small nodules (<2.0 cm). There were no major complications, and no significant differences in complication according to biopsy methods.

CONCLUSION

US-guided CNB improved the false negative rate and sensitivity for large nodules. Therefore, US-guided CNB can be considered a useful diagnostic method for large thyroid nodules that might reduce the risk of unnecessary diagnostic surgery.

Pathological diagnosis of thyroid nodules based on core needle biopsies: comparative study between core needle biopsies and resected specimens in 578 cases

BACKGROUND

Pathological diagnosis based on core needle biopsy (CNB) should be different from a resected specimen because it is difficult to apply the histological criteria established for resected specimens to CNB due to sampling limitations. A pathological classification for thyroid nodule on CNB was first proposed by the Korean Group in 2015. The objective of this study was to test the reliability and clinical value of this proposal.

METHODS

According to the Korean proposal, the CNB diagnoses were categorized into unsatisfactory, benign, indeterminate, follicular neoplasm, suspicious for malignancy and malignant. A comparative study between the diagnoses of CNB and resected specimens was performed.

RESULTS

The consistency was moderate (κ = 0.448). Combined indeterminate, suspicious for malignancy and malignant into a single group collectively referred to as "malignant" with the remaining merged into "others", CNB demonstrated a 95.93% sensitivity, 97.30% specificity, 62.07% accuracy, 99.81% positive predictive value (PPV) and 62.07% negative predictive value (NPV) for preoperative malignancy evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The Korean proposal for pathological classification of thyroid nodules on CNB is objective, operable and highly valuable.

The role of core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of initially detected thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the published literature and evaluate the efficacy and safety of core needle biopsy (CNB) for initially detected thyroid nodules.

METHODS

The Ovid-MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for studies evaluating CNB for the diagnosis of initially detected thyroid nodules. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate non-diagnostic results, inconclusive results and diagnostic accuracy for a diagnosis of malignancy with CNB. To overcome heterogeneity, multiple subgroup analyses were performed. The complication rate was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirteen eligible studies, which included a total sample size of 9,166 patients with 13,585 nodules, were included. The pooled proportions were 3.5% (95% CI 2.4-5.1) for non-diagnostic results and 13.8% (95% CI 9.1-20.3) for inconclusive results. Considerable heterogeneity was observed among the studies in terms of the pooled proportions for CNB (I²=92.9%, 97%). With regard to the diagnostic performance for malignancy, the sensitivity was 80% (95% CI 75-85) and the specificity was 100% (95% CI 93-100). Only two major complications of CNB were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

CNB demonstrates a low non-diagnostic result rate and high diagnostic accuracy for initially detected thyroid nodules and a low major complication rate. These findings indicate that CNB may be a feasible diagnostic tool for patients with initially detected thyroid nodules.

KEY POINTS

CNB demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for initially detected thyroid nodules. CNB demonstrates a low major complication rate. CNB may be a feasible diagnostic tool for patients with initially detected thyroid nodules.