Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Safety Evaluation of Primary Carotid Stenting: Transcranial Doppler and MRI

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cerebral emboli are generated by every step of standard carotid angioplasty and stenting. Primary carotid stenting (PCS) is a technique in which the use of balloon angioplasty (BA) is minimized to decrease the embolic load. The primary aim of this study is to establish the number of emboli generated by each step of primary stenting and determine the relationship to new diffusion (DWI) lesions on subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Eighty-five patients with severe, symptomatic carotid stenosis were prospectively recruited and underwent carotid stenting. Intraoperative transcranial Doppler was performed in 77 patients. The number and size of microemboli for each of seven procedural steps were recorded. Correlation was made with the number and location of new DWI lesions.

RESULTS

PCS was performed in 73 patients. BA was required in 12 patients. The mean number of microemboli was 114, and most microemboli were generated by stent deployment, followed by BA. Balloon techniques generated significantly more emboli than primary stenting (p = 0.017). There was a significant relationship between total microemboli and new DWI lesions (p = 0.009), and between new DWI lesions in multiple territories and the severity of pretreatment stenosis (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

During PCS, more emboli are generated by stent deployment than during any other stage of the procedure. When BA is necessary, more malignant emboli are generated but total emboli are unchanged and there is no difference in new diffusion lesions on MRI. PCS is safe and is not inferior to historical controls for the generation of new DWI lesions.

Poststent ballooning during transcarotid artery revascularization

BACKGROUND

Poststent ballooning/angioplasty (post-SB) have been shown to increase the risk of stroke risk after transfemoral carotid artery stenting. With the advancement of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) with dynamic cerebral blood flow reversal, we aimed to study the impact of post-SB during TCAR.

METHODS

Patients undergoing TCAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative between September 2016 and May 2019 were included and were divided into three groups: those who received prestent deployment angioplasty only (pre-SB, reference group), those who received poststent deployment ballooning only (post-SB), and those who received both prestent and poststent deployment ballooning (prepost-SB). Patients who did not receive any angioplasty during their procedure (n = 367 [6.7%]) were excluded because these represent a different group of patients with less complex lesions than those requiring angioplasty. Primary outcome was in-hospital stroke or death. Analysis was performed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Of 5161 patients undergoing TCAR, 34.7% had pre-SB only, 25% had post-SB only, and 40.3% had both (prepost-SB). No differences in the rates of in-hospital and 30-day stroke, death, and stroke/death were observed among the three groups; in-hospital stroke/death in the pre-SB group was 1.4% (n = 25), post-SB 1.2% (n = 16), and prepost-SB 1.4% (n = 29; P = .92). However, patients undergoing post-SB and prepost-SB had higher rates of in-hospital transient ischemic attacks (TIA) (post-SB, 0.9%; prepost-SB, 1% vs pre-SB, 0.2%, P < .01) and postprocedural hypotension (16.6% and 16.8% vs 13.1%, respectively; P < .001). Post-SB also had longer operative times, as well as flow reversal and fluoroscopy times. On multivariable analysis, no association was seen between post-SB and the primary outcome of in-hospital stroke/death (post-SB odds ratio [OR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-1.73; prepost-SB OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.57-1.70). Similarly, no significant differences were noted in terms of postprocedural hemodynamic instability and 30-day outcomes. However, post-SB and prepost-SB were associated with four times the odds of in-hospital TIA compared with pre-SB alone (post-SB OR, 4.24 [95% CI, 1.51-11.8]; prepost-SB OR, 4.76 [95% CI, 1.53-14.79]; P = .01). Symptomatic patients had higher rates of in-hospital stroke/death compared with their asymptomatic counterparts; however, there was no significant interaction between symptomatic status and ballooning in predicting the primary outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-SB was used in 65.3% of TCAR patients. This maneuver seems to be safe without an increase in the odds of postoperative in-hospital stroke/death. However, the increased rates of TIA associated with post-SB requires further investigation.

Direct Cervical Carotid Stenting and Angioplasty of Right Internal Carotid Artery and Brachiocephalic Artery Ostial Stenoses With Flow Reversal: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

We present a case of tandem stenosis of the great vessels (cervical internal carotid artery [ICA] and brachiocephalic trunk ostium [BTO]) treated with stenting and balloon angioplasty of both lesions under flow arrest. A 70-yr-old woman with a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, and previous strokes presented with recurrent transient ischemic attacks of the left upper and lower extremities over the last 6 mo. She underwent right cervical endarterectomy (CEA) 16 yr prior. Neurological examination was unremarkable. Carotid Doppler ultrasonography revealed severely increased velocities of the right ICA. Cervical magnetic resonance angiography demonstrated 80% right ICA stenosis and 50% BTO stenosis. Digital subtraction cerebral angiography showed 80% right ICA stenosis and 70% BTO stenosis. The patient was not a candidate for standard carotid artery stenting because the BTO precluded endovascular access or for CEA because of the previous CEA; therefore, direct carotid access and flow reversal was an alternative. Under general anesthesia and systemic heparinization, the patient underwent right carotid artery surgical exposure. Under flow reversal using the Enroute System (Silk Road Medical, Sunnyvale, California), anterograde right ICA stenting angioplasty and retrograde BTO stenting and angioplasty were performed. Successful revascularization of the right ICA and BTO was obtained. No procedure-related complications occurred. The patient was discharged home 2 d postprocedure, neurologically intact. Direct carotid access with flow reversal is a safe and effective therapeutic alternative for patients with ICA (or common carotid artery) stenosis who cannot undergo CEA or when endovascular access from the aortic arch is not possible.

 Patient consent was obtained prior to performing the procedure. Institutional board approval is not required for the report of a single case.