Differentiation of Enhancing Glioma and Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma by Texture-Based Machine Learning

How does deep learning/machine learning perform in comparison to radiologists in distinguishing glioblastomas (or grade IV astrocytomas) from primary CNS lymphomas?: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Several studies have been published comparing deep learning (DL)/machine learning (ML) to radiologists in differentiating PCNSLs from GBMs with equivocal results. We aimed to perform this meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ML/DL versus radiologists in classifying PCNSL versus GBM using MRI.

METHODOLOGY

The study was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Data was extracted and interpreted by two researchers with 12 and 23 years' experience, respectively, and QUADAS-2 tool was used for quality and risk-bias assessment. We constructed contingency tables to derive sensitivity, specificity accuracy, summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, and the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Our search identified 11 studies, of which 8 satisfied our inclusion criteria and restricted the analysis in each study to reporting the model showing highest accuracy, with a total sample size of 1159 patients. The random effects model showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.89 [95% CI:0.84-0.92] for ML and 0.82 [95% CI:0.76-0.87] for radiologists. Pooled specificity was 0.88 [95% CI: 0.84-0.91] for ML and 0.90 [95% CI: 0.81-0.95] for radiologists. Pooled accuracy was 0.88 [95% CI: 0.86-0.90] for ML and 0.86 [95% CI: 0.78-0.91] for radiologists. Pooled AUC of ML was 0.94 [95% CI:0.92-0.96]and for radiologists, it was 0.90 [95% CI: 0.84-0.93].

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-based ML/DL techniques can complement radiologists to improve the accuracy of classifying GBMs from PCNSL, possibly reduce the need for a biopsy, and avoid any unwanted neurosurgical resection of a PCNSL.

An accessible deep learning tool for voxel-wise classification of brain malignancies from perfusion MRI

Noninvasive differential diagnosis of brain tumors is currently based on the assessment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) coupled with dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC). However, a definitive diagnosis often requires neurosurgical interventions that compromise patients' quality of life. We apply deep learning on DSC images from histology-confirmed patients with glioblastoma, metastasis, or lymphoma. The convolutional neural network trained on ∼50,000 voxels from 40 patients provides intratumor probability maps that yield clinical-grade diagnosis. Performance is tested in 400 additional cases and an external validation cohort of 128 patients. The tool reaches a three-way accuracy of 0.78, superior to the conventional MRI metrics cerebral blood volume (0.55) and percentage of signal recovery (0.59), showing high value as a support diagnostic tool. Our open-access software, Diagnosis In Susceptibility Contrast Enhancing Regions for Neuro-oncology (DISCERN), demonstrates its potential in aiding medical decisions for brain tumor diagnosis using standard-of-care MRI.

Radiomics for differentiation of gliomas from primary central nervous system lymphomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and objective

Numerous radiomics-based models have been proposed to discriminate between central nervous system (CNS) gliomas and primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs). Given the heterogeneity of the existing models, we aimed to define their overall performance and identify the most critical variables to pilot future algorithms.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis were conducted, encompassing 12 studies and a total of 1779 patients, focusing on radiomics to differentiate gliomas from PCNSLs. A comprehensive literature search was performed through PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Overall sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) were estimated. Event rates were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis, and the heterogeneity was assessed using the χ2 test.

Results

The overall SEN and SPE for differentiation between CNS gliomas and PCNSLs were 88% (95% CI = 0.83 - 0.91) and 87% (95% CI = 0.83 - 0.91), respectively. The best-performing features were the ones extracted from the Gray Level Run Length Matrix (GLRLM; ACC 97%), followed by those obtained from the Neighboring Gray Tone Difference Matrix (NGTDM; ACC 93%), and shape-based features (ACC 91%). The 18F-FDG-PET/CT was the best-performing imaging modality (ACC 97%), followed by the MRI CE-T1W (ACC 87% - 95%). Most studies applied a cross-validation analysis (92%).

Conclusion

The current SEN and SPE of radiomics to discriminate CNS gliomas from PCNSLs are high, making radiomics a helpful method to differentiate these tumor types. The best-performing features are the GLRLM, NGTDM, and shape-based features. The 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging modality is the best-performing, while the MRI CE-T1W is the most used.

Medical image identification methods: A review

The identification of medical images is an essential task in computer-aided diagnosis, medical image retrieval and mining. Medical image data mainly include electronic health record data and gene information data, etc. Although intelligent imaging provided a good scheme for medical image analysis over traditional methods that rely on the handcrafted features, it remains challenging due to the diversity of imaging modalities and clinical pathologies. Many medical image identification methods provide a good scheme for medical image analysis. The concepts pertinent of methods, such as the machine learning, deep learning, convolutional neural networks, transfer learning, and other image processing technologies for medical image are analyzed and summarized in this paper. We reviewed these recent studies to provide a comprehensive overview of applying these methods in various medical image analysis tasks, such as object detection, image classification, image registration, segmentation, and other tasks. Especially, we emphasized the latest progress and contributions of different methods in medical image analysis, which are summarized base on different application scenarios, including classification, segmentation, detection, and image registration. In addition, the applications of different methods are summarized in different application area, such as pulmonary, brain, digital pathology, brain, skin, lung, renal, breast, neuromyelitis, vertebrae, and musculoskeletal, etc. Critical discussion of open challenges and directions for future research are finally summarized. Especially, excellent algorithms in computer vision, natural language processing, and unmanned driving will be applied to medical image recognition in the future.

Fully automated MR-based virtual biopsy of primary CNS lymphomas

Background

Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) pose a challenge as they may mimic gliomas on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging, compelling precise differentiation for appropriate treatment. This study focuses on developing an automated MRI-based workflow to distinguish between PCNSL and gliomas.

Methods

MRI examinations of 240 therapy-naive patients (141 males and 99 females, mean age: 55.16 years) with cerebral gliomas and PCNSLs (216 gliomas and 24 PCNSLs), each comprising a non-contrast T1-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequence were included in the study. HD-GLIO, a pre-trained segmentation network, was used to generate segmentations automatically. To validate the segmentation efficiency, 237 manual segmentations were prepared (213 gliomas and 24 PCNSLs). Subsequently, radiomics features were extracted following feature selection and training of an XGBoost algorithm for classification.

Results

The segmentation models for gliomas and PCNSLs achieved a mean Sørensen-Dice coefficient of 0.82 and 0.80 for whole tumors, respectively. Three classification models were developed in this study to differentiate gliomas from PCNSLs. The first model differentiated PCNSLs from gliomas, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99 (F1-score: 0.75). The second model discriminated between high-grade gliomas and PCNSLs with an AUC of 0.91 (F1-score: 0.6), and the third model differentiated between low-grade gliomas and PCNSLs with an AUC of 0.95 (F1-score: 0.89).

Conclusions

This study serves as a pilot investigation presenting an automated virtual biopsy workflow that distinguishes PCNSLs from cerebral gliomas. Prior to clinical use, it is necessary to validate the results in a prospective multicenter setting with a larger number of PCNSL patients.

Systematic reviews of machine learning in healthcare: a literature review

INTRODUCTION

The increasing availability of data and computing power has made machine learning (ML) a viable approach to faster, more efficient healthcare delivery.

METHODS

A systematic literature review (SLR) of published SLRs evaluating ML applications in healthcare settings published between1 January 2010 and 27 March 2023 was conducted.

RESULTS

In total 220 SLRs covering 10,462 ML algorithms were reviewed. The main application of AI in medicine related to the clinical prediction and disease prognosis in oncology and neurology with the use of imaging data. Accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity were provided in 56%, 28%, and 25% SLRs respectively. Internal and external validation was reported in 53% and less than 1% of the cases respectively. The most common modeling approach was neural networks (2,454 ML algorithms), followed by support vector machine and random forest/decision trees (1,578 and 1,522 ML algorithms, respectively).

EXPERT OPINION

The review indicated considerable reporting gaps in terms of the ML's performance, both internal and external validation. Greater accessibility to healthcare data for developers can ensure the faster adoption of ML algorithms into clinical practice.

Differentiation between cerebral alveolar echinococcosis and brain metastases with radiomics combined machine learning approach

BACKGROUND

Cerebral alveolar echinococcosis (CAE) and brain metastases (BM) share similar in locations and imaging appearance. However, they require distinct treatment approaches, with CAE typically treated with chemotherapy and surgery, while BM is managed with radiotherapy and targeted therapy for the primary malignancy. Accurate diagnosis is crucial due to the divergent treatment strategies.

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of radiomics and machine learning techniques based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to differentiate between CAE and BM.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed MRI images of 130 patients (30 CAE and 100 BM) from Xinjiang Medical University First Affiliated Hospital and The First People's Hospital of Kashi Prefecture, between January 2014 and December 2022. The dataset was divided into training (91 cases) and testing (39 cases) sets. Three dimensional tumors were segmented by radiologists from contrast-enhanced T1WI images on open resources software 3D Slicer. Features were extracted on Pyradiomics, further feature reduction was carried out using univariate analysis, correlation analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Finally, we built five machine learning models, support vector machine, logistic regression, linear discrimination analysis, k-nearest neighbors classifier, and Gaussian naïve bias and evaluated their performance via several metrics including sensitivity (recall), specificity, positive predictive value (precision), negative predictive value, accuracy and the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The area under curve (AUC) of support vector classifier (SVC), linear discrimination analysis (LDA), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and gaussian naïve bias (NB) algorithms in training (testing) sets are 0.99 (0.94), 1.00 (0.87), 0.98 (0.92), 0.97 (0.97), and 0.98 (0.93), respectively. Nested cross-validation demonstrated the robustness and generalizability of the models. Additionally, the calibration plot and decision curve analysis demonstrated the practical usefulness of these models in clinical practice, with lower bias toward different subgroups during decision-making.

CONCLUSION

The combination of radiomics and machine learning approach based on contrast enhanced T1WI images could well distinguish CAE and BM. This approach holds promise in assisting doctors with accurate diagnosis and clinical decision-making.

Emerging role of artificial intelligence in diagnosis, classification and clinical management of glioma

Glioma represents a dominant primary intracranial malignancy in the central nervous system. Artificial intelligence that mainly includes machine learning, and deep learning computational approaches, presents a unique opportunity to enhance clinical management of glioma through improving tumor segmentation, diagnosis, differentiation, grading, treatment, prediction of clinical outcomes (prognosis, and recurrence), molecular features, clinical classification, characterization of the tumor microenvironment, and drug discovery. A growing body of recent studies apply artificial intelligence-based models to disparate data sources of glioma, covering imaging modalities, digital pathology, high-throughput multi-omics data (especially emerging single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptome), etc. While these early findings are promising, future studies are required to normalize artificial intelligence-based models to improve the generalizability and interpretability of the results. Despite prominent issues, targeted clinical application of artificial intelligence approaches in glioma will facilitate the development of precision medicine of this field. If these challenges can be overcome, artificial intelligence has the potential to profoundly change the way patients with or at risk of glioma are provided with more rational care.

The application of machine learning to imaging in hematological oncology: A scoping review

Background

Here, we conducted a scoping review to (i) establish which machine learning (ML) methods have been applied to hematological malignancy imaging; (ii) establish how ML is being applied to hematological cancer radiology; and (iii) identify addressable research gaps.

Methods

The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. The inclusion criteria were (i) pediatric and adult patients with suspected or confirmed hematological malignancy undergoing imaging (population); (ii) any study using ML techniques to derive models using radiological images to apply to the clinical management of these patients (concept); and (iii) original research articles conducted in any setting globally (context). Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 criteria were used to assess diagnostic and segmentation studies, while the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of observational studies.

Results

Of 53 eligible studies, 33 applied diverse ML techniques to diagnose hematological malignancies or to differentiate them from other diseases, especially discriminating gliomas from primary central nervous system lymphomas (n=18); 11 applied ML to segmentation tasks, while 9 applied ML to prognostication or predicting therapeutic responses, especially for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. All studies reported discrimination statistics, but no study calculated calibration statistics. Every diagnostic/segmentation study had a high risk of bias due to their case-control design; many studies failed to provide adequate details of the reference standard; and only a few studies used independent validation.

Conclusion

To deliver validated ML-based models to radiologists managing hematological malignancies, future studies should (i) adhere to standardized, high-quality reporting guidelines such as the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging; (ii) validate models in independent cohorts; (ii) standardize volume segmentation methods for segmentation tasks; (iv) establish comprehensive prospective studies that include different tumor grades, comparisons with radiologists, optimal imaging modalities, sequences, and planes; (v) include side-by-side comparisons of different methods; and (vi) include low- and middle-income countries in multicentric studies to enhance generalizability and reduce inequity.

The effect of CT texture-based analysis using machine learning approaches on radiologists' performance in differentiating focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic duct carcinoma

PURPOSE

To develop a support vector machine (SVM) classifier using CT texture-based analysis in differentiating focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic duct carcinoma (PD), and to assess the radiologists' diagnostic performance with or without SVM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 50 patients (20 patients with focal-type AIP and 30 patients with PD) who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. Sixty-two CT texture-based features were extracted from 2D images of the arterial and portal phase CTs. We conducted data compression and feature selections using principal component analysis (PCA) and produced the SVM classifier. Four readers participated in this observer performance study and the statistical significance of differences with and without the SVM was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

The SVM performance indicated a high performance in differentiating focal-type AIP and PD (AUC = 0.920). The AUC for all 4 readers increased significantly from 0.827 to 0.911 when using the SVM outputs (p = 0.010). The AUC for inexperienced readers increased significantly from 0.781 to 0.905 when using the SVM outputs (p = 0.310). The AUC for experienced readers increased from 0.875 to 0.912 when using the SVM outputs, however, there was no significant difference (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

The use of SVM classifier using CT texture-based features improved the diagnostic performance for differentiating focal-type AIP and PD on CT.

Machine Learning and Deep Learning CT-Based Models for Predicting the Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and Glioma Types: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Purpose and Background

Distinguishing primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioma on computed tomography (CT) is an important task since treatment options differ vastly from the two diseases. This study aims to explore various machine learning and deep learning methods based on radiomic features extracted from CT scans and end-to-end convolutional neural network (CNN) model to predict PCNSL and glioma types and compare the performance of different models.

Methods

A total of 101 patients from five Chinese medical centers with pathologically confirmed PCNSL and glioma were analyzed retrospectively, including 50 PCNSL and 51 glioma. After manual segmentation of the region of interest (ROI) on CT scans, 293 radiomic features of each patient were extracted. The radiomic features were used as input, and then, we established six machine learning models and one deep learning model and three readers to identify the two types of tumors. We also established a 2D CNN model using raw CT scans as input. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy (ACC) were used to evaluate different models.

Results

The cohort was split into a training (70, 70% patients) and validation cohort (31,30% patients) according to the stratified sampling strategy. Among all models, the MLP performed best, with an accuracy of 0.886 and 0.903, sensitivity of 0.914 and 0.867, specificity of 0.857 and 0.937, and AUC of 0.957 and 0.908 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively, which was significantly higher than the three primary physician's diagnoses (ACCs ranged from 0.710 to 0.742, p < 0.001 for all) and comparable with the senior radiologist (ACC 0.839, p = 0.988). Among all the machine learning models, the AUC ranged from 0.605 to 0.821 in the validation cohort. The end-to-end CNN model achieved an AUC of 0.839 and an ACC of 0.840 in the validation cohort, which had no significant difference in accuracy compared to the MLP model (p = 0.472) and the senior radiologist (p = 0.470).

Conclusion

The established PCNSL and glioma prediction model based on deep neural network methods from CT scans or radiomic features are feasible and provided high performance, which shows the potential to assist clinical decision-making.

Artificial intelligence in the radiomic analysis of glioblastomas: A review, taxonomy, and perspective

Radiological imaging techniques, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET), are the standard-of-care non-invasive diagnostic approaches widely applied in neuro-oncology. Unfortunately, accurate interpretation of radiological imaging data is constantly challenged by the indistinguishable radiological image features shared by different pathological changes associated with tumor progression and/or various therapeutic interventions. In recent years, machine learning (ML)-based artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been widely applied in medical image processing and bioinformatics due to its advantages in implicit image feature extraction and integrative data analysis. Despite its recent rapid development, ML technology still faces many hurdles for its broader applications in neuro-oncological radiomic analysis, such as lack of large accessible standardized real patient radiomic brain tumor data of all kinds and reliable predictions on tumor response upon various treatments. Therefore, understanding ML-based AI technologies is critically important to help us address the skyrocketing demands of neuro-oncology clinical deployments. Here, we provide an overview on the latest advancements in ML techniques for brain tumor radiomic analysis, emphasizing proprietary and public dataset preparation and state-of-the-art ML models for brain tumor diagnosis, classifications (e.g., primary and secondary tumors), discriminations between treatment effects (pseudoprogression, radiation necrosis) and true progression, survival prediction, inflammation, and identification of brain tumor biomarkers. We also compare the key features of ML models in the realm of neuroradiology with ML models employed in other medical imaging fields and discuss open research challenges and directions for future work in this nascent precision medicine area.

A triple-classification for the evaluation of lung nodules manifesting as pure ground-glass sign: a CT-based radiomic analysis

OBJECTIVES

To construct a noninvasive radiomics model for evaluating the pathological degree and an individualized treatment strategy for patients with the manifestation of ground glass nodules (GGNs) on CT images.

METHODS

The retrospective primary cohort investigation included patients with GGNs on CT images who underwent resection between June 2015 and June 2020. The intratumoral regions of interest were segmented semiautomatically, and radiomics features were extracted from the intratumoral and peritumoral regions. After feature selection by ANOVA, Max-Relevance and Min-Redundancy (mRMR) and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) regression, a random forest (RF) model was generated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was calculated to evaluate each classification. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) was applied to interpret the radiomics features.

RESULTS

In this study, 241 patients including atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) or adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) (n = 72), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) (n = 83) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) (n = 86) were selected for radiomics analysis. Three intratumoral radiomics features and one peritumoral feature were finally identified by the triple RF classifier with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.960 (0.963 for AAH/AIS, 0.940 for MIA, 0.978 for IAC) in the training set and 0.944 (0.955 for AAH/AIS, 0.952 for MIA, 0.926 for IAC) in the testing set for evaluation of the GGNs.

CONCLUSION

The triple classification based on intra- and peritumoral radiomics features derived from the noncontrast CT images had satisfactory performance and may be used as a noninvasive tool for preoperative evaluation of the pure ground-glass nodules and developing of individualized treatment strategies.

Primary CNS lymphoma in Immunocompetent patients: Appearances on Conventional and Advanced Imaging with Review of literature

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) constitutes about 3% of all primary brain tumors and nearly 1 to 3% of all Non Hodgkin Lymphomas. In the recent years the incidence of primary CNS lymphoma is increasing in immunocompetent patients. As PCNSL are chemosensitive as well as radiosensitive, its early and accurate diagnosis is imperative for optimal management. Contrast enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the recommended imaging modality for PCNSL; however, contrast enhanced Computed Tomography (CE-CT) is done in cases where MRI is contraindicated. Advanced imaging techniques like DWI (diffusion weighted imaging), MRS (MR Spectroscopy), MR perfusion, DTI (Diffusion tensor imaging) are important in diagnosis and help in its differentiation from other tumors.

A Systematic Review of the Current Status and Quality of Radiomics for Glioma Differential Diagnosis

Simple Summary

Gliomas can be difficult to discern clinically and radiologically from other brain lesions (either neoplastic or non-neoplastic) since their clinical manifestations as well as preoperative imaging features often overlap and appear misleading. Radiomics could be extremely helpful for non-invasive glioma differential diagnosis (DDx). However, implementation in clinical practice is still distant and concerns have been raised regarding the methodological quality of radiomic studies. In this context, we aimed to summarize the current status and quality of radiomic studies concerning glioma DDx in a systematic review. In total, 42 studies were selected and examined in our work. Our study revealed that, despite promising and encouraging results, current studies on radiomics for glioma DDx still lack the quality required to allow its introduction into clinical practice. This work could provide new insights and help to reach a consensus on the use of the radiomic approach for glioma DDx.

Abstract

Radiomics is a promising tool that may increase the value of imaging in differential diagnosis (DDx) of glioma. However, implementation in clinical practice is still distant and concerns have been raised regarding the methodological quality of radiomic studies. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review the current status of radiomic studies concerning glioma DDx, also using the radiomics quality score (RQS) to assess the quality of the methodology used in each study. A systematic literature search was performed to identify original articles focused on the use of radiomics for glioma DDx from 2015. Methodological quality was assessed using the RQS tool. Spearman’s correlation (ρ) analysis was performed to explore whether RQS was correlated with journal metrics and the characteristics of the studies. Finally, 42 articles were selected for the systematic qualitative analysis. Selected articles were grouped and summarized in terms of those on DDx between glioma and primary central nervous system lymphoma, those aiming at differentiating glioma from brain metastases, and those based on DDx of glioma and other brain diseases. Median RQS was 8.71 out 36, with a mean RQS of all studies of 24.21%. Our study revealed that, despite promising and encouraging results, current studies on radiomics for glioma DDx still lack the quality required to allow its introduction into clinical practice. This work could provide new insights and help to reach a consensus on the use of the radiomic approach for glioma DDx.

Identification of Serum miRNAs as Effective Diagnostic Biomarkers for Distinguishing Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma from Glioma

Invasive surgical cerebrum biopsy results in delayed treatment for the definitive diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). The existent research was aimed at confirming the underlying diagnostic miRNAs of distinguishing PCNSL from glioma. A publicly available miRNA expression profiles (GSE139031) from adult PCNSL as well as glioma specimens were provided by GEO datasets. Differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) were filtered between 42 PCNSL patients and 170 glioma patients. Candidate miRNAs were identified through SVM-RFE analysis and LASSO model. ROC assays were operated to determine the diagnostic value of serum miRNAs in distinguishing PCNSL from glioma. StarBase v2.0 was applied to screen the targeting genes of miRNAs, and KEGG analysis was applied using the targeting genes of miRNAs. In this study, we identified 12 dysregulated miRNAs between PCNSL and glioma samples. The ten critical miRNAs (miR-6820-3p, miR-6803-3p, miR-30a-3p, miR-4751, miR-3918, miR-146a-3p, miR-548am-3p, miR-371a-3p, miR-487a-3p, and miR-4756-5p) between these two algorithms were ultimately identified. The results of KEGG revealed that the targeting genes of hsa-miR-3918 were primarily related to MAPK signal pathway, PI3K-Akt signal pathway, and human papillomavirus infection. Overall, bioinformatics analysis revealed that ten miRNAs are potential biomarker for distinguishing PCNSL from glioma.

Machine Learning in Differentiating Gliomas from Primary CNS Lymphomas: A Systematic Review, Reporting Quality, and Risk of Bias Assessment

BACKGROUND

Differentiating gliomas and primary CNS lymphoma represents a diagnostic challenge with important therapeutic ramifications. Biopsy is the preferred method of diagnosis, while MR imaging in conjunction with machine learning has shown promising results in differentiating these tumors.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to evaluate the quality of reporting and risk of bias, assess data bases with which the machine learning classification algorithms were developed, the algorithms themselves, and their performance.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Web of Science Core Collection were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION

From 11,727 studies, 23 peer-reviewed studies used machine learning to differentiate primary CNS lymphoma from gliomas in 2276 patients.

DATA ANALYSIS

Characteristics of data sets and machine learning algorithms were extracted. A meta-analysis on a subset of studies was performed. Reporting quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) and Prediction Model Study Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.961) and accuracy (91.2%) in external validation were achieved by logistic regression and support vector machines models using conventional radiomic features. Meta-analysis of machine learning classifiers using these features yielded a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.944 (95% CI, 0.898-0.99). The median TRIPOD score was 51.7%. The risk of bias was high for 16 studies.

LIMITATIONS

Exclusion of abstracts decreased the sensitivity in evaluating all published studies. Meta-analysis had high heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning-based methods of differentiating primary CNS lymphoma from gliomas have shown great potential, but most studies lack large, balanced data sets and external validation. Assessment of the studies identified multiple deficiencies in reporting quality and risk of bias. These factors reduce the generalizability and reproducibility of the findings.

Differentiating Glioblastomas from Solitary Brain Metastases: An Update on the Current Literature of Advanced Imaging Modalities

Differentiating between glioblastomas and solitary brain metastases proves to be a challenging diagnosis for neuroradiologists, as both present with imaging patterns consisting of peritumoral hyperintensities with similar intratumoral texture on traditional magnetic resonance imaging sequences. Early diagnosis is paramount, as each pathology has completely different methods of clinical assessment. In the past decade, recent developments in advanced imaging modalities enabled providers to acquire a more accurate diagnosis earlier in the patient's clinical assessment, thus optimizing clinical outcome. Dynamic susceptibility contrast has been optimized for detecting relative cerebral blood flow and relative cerebral blood volume. Diffusion tensor imaging can be used to detect changes in mean diffusivity. Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging is an innovative modality detecting changes in intracellular volume fraction, isotropic volume fraction, and extracellular volume fraction. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy is able to assist by providing a metabolic descriptor while detecting variable ratios of choline/N-acetylaspartate, choline/creatine, and N-acetylaspartate/creatine. Finally, radiomics and machine learning algorithms have been devised to assist in improving diagnostic accuracy while often utilizing more than one advanced imaging protocol per patient. In this review, we provide an update on all the current evidence regarding the identification and differentiation of glioblastomas from solitary brain metastases.

Positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in primary central nervous system lymphoma-a narrative review

This review addresses the challenges of primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma diagnosis, assessment of treatment response, and detection of recurrence. Primary CNS lymphoma is a rare form of extra-nodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma that can involve brain, spinal cord, leptomeninges, and eyes. Primary CNS lymphoma lesions are most commonly confined to the white matter or deep cerebral structures such as basal ganglia and deep periventricular regions. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard diagnostic modality employed by neuro-oncologists. MRI often shows common morphological features such as a single or multiple uniformly well-enhancing lesions without necrosis but with moderate surrounding edema. Other brain tumors or inflammatory processes can show similar radiological patterns, making differential diagnosis difficult. [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has selected utility in cerebral lymphoma, especially in diagnosis. Primary CNS lymphoma can sometimes present with atypical findings on MRI and FDG PET, such as disseminated disease, non-enhancing or ring-like enhancing lesions. The complementary strengths of PET and MRI have led to the development of combined PET-MR systems, which in some cases may improve lesion characterization and detection. By highlighting active developments in this field, including advanced MRI sequences, novel radiotracers, and potential imaging biomarkers, we aim to spur interest in sophisticated imaging approaches.

Machine learning applications to neuroimaging for glioma detection and classification: An artificial intelligence augmented systematic review

Glioma is the most common primary intraparenchymal tumor of the brain and the 5-year survival rate of high-grade glioma is poor. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for detecting, characterizing and monitoring brain tumors but definitive diagnosis still relies on surgical pathology. Machine learning has been applied to the analysis of MRI data in glioma research and has the potential to change clinical practice and improve patient outcomes. This systematic review synthesizes and analyzes the current state of machine learning applications to glioma MRI data and explores the use of machine learning for systematic review automation. Various datapoints were extracted from the 153 studies that met inclusion criteria and analyzed. Natural language processing (NLP) analysis involved keyword extraction, topic modeling and document classification. Machine learning has been applied to tumor grading and diagnosis, tumor segmentation, non-invasive genomic biomarker identification, detection of progression and patient survival prediction. Model performance was generally strong (AUC = 0.87 ± 0.09; sensitivity = 0.87 ± 0.10; specificity = 0.0.86 ± 0.10; precision = 0.88 ± 0.11). Convolutional neural network, support vector machine and random forest algorithms were top performers. Deep learning document classifiers yielded acceptable performance (mean 5-fold cross-validation AUC = 0.71). Machine learning tools and data resources were synthesized and summarized to facilitate future research. Machine learning has been widely applied to the processing of MRI data in glioma research and has demonstrated substantial utility. NLP and transfer learning resources enabled the successful development of a replicable method for automating the systematic review article screening process, which has potential for shortening the time from discovery to clinical application in medicine.

Radiomics-based differentiation between glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma: a comparison of diagnostic performance across different MRI sequences and machine learning techniques

OBJECTIVES

Despite the robust diagnostic performance of MRI-based radiomic features for differentiating between glioblastoma (GBM) and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) reported on prior studies, the best sequence or a combination of sequences and model performance across various machine learning pipelines remain undefined. Herein, we compare the diagnostic performance of multiple radiomics-based models to differentiate GBM from PCNSL.

METHODS

Our retrospective study included 94 patients (34 with PCNSL and 60 with GBM). Model performance was assessed using various MRI sequences across 45 possible model and feature selection combinations for nine different sequence permutations. Predictive performance was assessed using fivefold repeated cross-validation with five repeats. The best and worst performing models were compared to assess differences in performance.

RESULTS

The predictive performance, both using individual and a combination of sequences, was fairly robust across multiple top performing models (AUC: 0.961-0.977) but did show considerable variation between the best and worst performing models. The top performing individual sequences had comparable performance to multiparametric models. The best prediction model in our study used a combination of ADC, FLAIR, and T1-CE achieving the highest AUC of 0.977, while the second ranked model used T1-CE and ADC, achieving a cross-validated AUC of 0.975.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics-based predictive accuracy can vary considerably, based on the model and feature selection methods as well as the combination of sequences used. Also, models derived from limited sequences show performance comparable to those derived from all five sequences.

KEY POINTS

• Radiomics-based diagnostic performance of various machine learning models for differentiating glioblastoma and PCNSL varies considerably. • ML models using limited or multiple MRI sequences can provide comparable performance, based on the chosen model. • Embedded feature selection models perform better than models using a priori feature reduction.

Differentiation of Glioma Mimicking Encephalitis and Encephalitis Using Multiparametric MR-Based Deep Learning

Background

Computational aid for diagnosis based on convolutional neural network (CNN) is promising to improve clinical diagnostic performance. Therefore, we applied pretrained CNN models in multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) images to classify glioma mimicking encephalitis and encephalitis.

Methods

A data set containing 3064 MRI brain images from 164 patients with a final diagnosis of glioma (n = 56) and encephalitis (n = 108) patients and divided into training and testing sets. We applied three MRI modalities [fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), contrast enhanced-T1 weighted imaging (CE-T1WI) and T2 weighted imaging (T2WI)] as the input data to build three pretrained deep CNN models (Alexnet, ResNet-50, and Inception-v3), and then compared their classification performance with radiologists' diagnostic performance. These models were evaluated by using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of a five-fold cross-validation and the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity were analyzed.

Results

The three pretrained CNN models all had AUC values over 0.9 with excellent performance. The highest classification accuracy of 97.57% was achieved by the Inception-v3 model based on the T2WI data. In addition, Inception-v3 performed statistically significantly better than the Alexnet architecture (p<0.05). For Inception-v3 and ResNet-50 models, T2WI offered the highest accuracy, followed by CE-T1WI and FLAIR. The performance of Inception-v3 and ResNet-50 had a significant difference with radiologists (p<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the results of the Alexnet and those of a more experienced radiologist (p >0.05).

Conclusions

The pretrained CNN models can automatically and accurately classify these two diseases and further help to improving clinical diagnostic performance.

Deep Learning for Automatic Differential Diagnosis of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and Glioblastoma: Multi-Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Convolutional Neural Network Model

BACKGROUND

Differential diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioblastoma (GBM) is useful to guide treatment strategies.

PURPOSE

To investigate the use of a convolutional neural network (CNN) model for differentiation of PCNSL and GBM without tumor delineation.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

A total of 289 patients with PCNSL (136) or GBM (153) were included, the average age of the cohort was 54 years, and there were 173 men and 116 women.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3.0 T Axial contrast-enhanced T₁ -weighted spin-echo inversion recovery sequence (CE-T₁ WI), T₂ -weighted fluid-attenuation inversion recovery sequence (FLAIR), and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI, b = 0 second/mm² , 1000 seconds/mm² ).

ASSESSMENT

A single-parametric CNN model was built using CE-T₁ WI, FLAIR, and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map derived from DWI, respectively. A decision-level fusion based multi-parametric CNN model (DF-CNN) was built by combining the predictions of single-parametric CNN models through logistic regression. An image-level fusion based multi-parametric CNN model (IF-CNN) was built using the integrated multi-parametric MR images. The radiomics models were developed. The diagnoses by three radiologists with 6 years (junior radiologist Y.Y.), 11 years (intermediate-level radiologist Y.T.), and 21 years (senior radiologist Y.L.) of experience were obtained.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The 5-fold cross validation was used for model evaluation. The Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare the accuracies. U-test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

The CE-T₁ WI, FLAIR, and ADC based single-parametric CNN model had accuracy of 0.884, 0.782, and 0.700, respectively. The DF-CNN model had an accuracy of 0.899 which was higher than the IF-CNN model (0.830, P = 0.021), but had no significant difference in accuracy compared to the radiomics model (0.865, P = 0.255), and the senior radiologist (0.906, P = 0.886).

DATA CONCLUSION

A CNN model can differentiate PCNSL from GBM without tumor delineation, and comparable to the radiomics models and radiologists.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Texture Analysis in Brain Tumor MR Imaging

Texture analysis, as well as its broader category radiomics, describes a variety of techniques for image analysis that quantify the variation in surface intensity or patterns, including some that are imperceptible to the human visual system. Cerebral gliomas have been most rigorously studied in brain tumors using MR-based texture analysis (MRTA) to determine the correlation of various clinical measures with MRTA features. Promising results in cerebral gliomas have been shown in the previous MRTA studies in terms of the correlation with the World Health Organization grades, risk stratification in gliomas, and the differentiation of gliomas from other brain tumors. Multiple MRTA studies in gliomas have repeatedly shown high performance of entropy, a measure of the randomness in image intensity values, of either histogram- or gray-level co-occurrence matrix parameters. Similarly, researchers have applied MRTA to other brain tumors, including meningiomas and pediatric posterior fossa tumors.

However, the value of MRTA in the clinical use remains undetermined, probably because previous studies have shown only limited reproducibility of the result in the real world. The low-to-modest generalizability may be attributed to variations in MRTA methods, sampling bias that originates from single-institution studies, and overfitting problems to a limited number of samples.

To enhance the reliability and reproducibility of MRTA studies, researchers have realized the importance of standardizing methods in the field of radiomics. Another advancement is the recent development of a comprehensive assessment system to ensure the quality of a radiomics study. These two-way approaches will secure the validity of upcoming MRTA studies. The clinical use of texture analysis in brain MRI will be accelerated by these continuous efforts.

Glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma: differentiation using MRI derived first-order texture analysis - a machine learning study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiple machine learning classifier models derived from first-order histogram texture parameters extracted from T1-weighted contrast-enhanced images in differentiating glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma.

METHODS

Retrospective study with 97 glioblastoma and 46 primary central nervous system lymphoma patients. Thirty-six different combinations of classifier models and feature selection techniques were evaluated. Five-fold nested cross-validation was performed. Model performance was assessed for whole tumour and largest single slice using receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

The cross-validated model performance was relatively similar for the top performing models for both whole tumour and largest single slice (area under the curve 0.909-0.924). However, there was a considerable difference between the worst performing model (logistic regression with full feature set, area under the curve 0.737) and the highest performing model for whole tumour (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model with correlation filter, area under the curve 0.924). For single slice, the multilayer perceptron model with correlation filter had the highest performance (area under the curve 0.914). No significant difference was seen between the diagnostic performance of the top performing model for both whole tumour and largest single slice.

CONCLUSIONS

T1 contrast-enhanced derived first-order texture analysis can differentiate between glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma with good diagnostic performance. The machine learning performance can vary significantly depending on the model and feature selection methods. Largest single slice and whole tumour analysis show comparable diagnostic performance.

Deep Learning-Based Method to Differentiate Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder From Multiple Sclerosis

Background: Differentiating neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) from multiple sclerosis (MS) is crucial in the field of diagnostics because, despite their similarities, the treatments for these two diseases are substantially different, and disease-modifying treatments for MS can worsen NMOSD. As brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important tool to distinguish the two diseases, extensive research has been conducted to identify the defining characteristics of MRI images corresponding to these two diseases. However, the application of such research in clinical practice is still limited. In this study, we investigate the applicability of a deep learning-based algorithm for differentiating NMOSD from MS.

Methods: In this study, we included 338 participants (213 patients with MS, 125 patients with NMOSD) who visited the Asan medical center between February 2009 and February 2020. A 3D convolutional neural network, which is a deep learning-based algorithm, was trained using fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images and clinical information of the participants. The performance of the final model in differentiating NMOSD from MS was evaluated and compared with that of two neurologists.

Results: The deep learning-based model exhibited an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.75–0.89). It differentiated NMOSD from MS with an accuracy of 71.1% (sensitivity = 87.8%, specificity = 61.6%), which is comparable to that exhibited by the neurologists. The intra-rater reliability of the two neurologists was moderate (κ = 0.47, 0.50), which was in contrast with the consistent classification of the deep learning-based model.

Conclusion: The proposed model was verified to be capable of differentiating NMOSD from MS with accuracy comparable to that of neurologists, exhibiting the advantage of consistent classification. As a result, it can aid differential diagnosis between two important central nervous system inflammatory diseases in clinical practice.

Comparison of Radiomics-Based Machine-Learning Classifiers in Diagnosis of Glioblastoma From Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Purpose: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the ability of magnetic resonance (MR) radiomics-based machine-learning algorithms in differentiating glioblastoma (GBM) from primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).

Method: One-hundred and thirty-eight patients were enrolled in this study. Radiomics features were extracted from contrast-enhanced MR images, and the machine-learning models were established using five selection methods (distance correlation, random forest, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), eXtreme gradient boosting (Xgboost), and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree) and three radiomics-based machine-learning classifiers [linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machine (SVM), and logistic regression (LR)]. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and areas under curves (AUC) of models were calculated, with which the performances of classifiers were evaluated and compared with each other.

Result: Brilliant discriminative performance would be observed among all classifiers when combined with the suitable selection method. For LDA-based models, the optimal one was Distance Correlation + LDA with AUC of 0.978. For SVM-based models, Distance Correlation + SVM was the one with highest AUC of 0.959, while for LR-based models, the highest AUC was 0.966 established with LASSO + LR.

Conclusion: Radiomics-based machine-learning algorithms potentially have promising performances in differentiating GBM from PCNSL.

Conventional MR and DW imaging findings of cerebellar primary CNS lymphoma: comparison with high-grade glioma

Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs) and high-grade gliomas (HGGs) arising in the cerebellum is extremely low, making the differential diagnosis difficult or even impossible. The purpose of this study was to define the MR features of cerebellar PCNSL in immunocompetent patients, and to determine whether a combination of conventional MR and DW imaging can assist in the differentiation of PCNSLs and HGGs. Twelve PCNSLs and 15 HGGs confirmed by pathological analysis were retrospectively identified. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and conventional MRI parameters were compared for differences between PCNSL and HGG groups using the independent sample t test or chi-square test. Both ADC_min and ADC_total values were lower in the PCNSL group than those in the HGG group (ADC_min: 0.53 × 10⁻³ vs. 0.83 × 10⁻³ mm²/sec, P < 0.001; ADC_total: 0.66 × 10⁻³ vs. 0.98 × 10⁻³ mm²/sec, P = 0.001). As for conventional MR features, there were significant difference in the tumor size, enhancement patterns, the presence of cystic changes, edema degree and streak-like edema (all P < 0.01); but there were no significant difference in lesion type, the presence of bleeding, and involvement of brain surface between two groups (P = 0.554, 0.657 and 0.157, respectively). The results revealed that several conventional MR features, including enhancement patterns, branch-like enhancement and streak-like edema may be useful for the differentiation of PCNSL and HGG in cerebellum and, when combined with ADC values, further improve the discriminating ability.

Current status and quality of radiomics studies in lymphoma: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review regarding the developments in the field of radiomics in lymphoma. To evaluate the quality of included articles by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2), the phases classification criteria for image mining studies, and the radiomics quality scoring (RQS) tool.

METHODS

We searched for eligible articles in the MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE databases using the terms "radiomics", "texture" and "lymphoma". The included studies were divided into two categories: diagnosis-, therapy response- and outcome-related studies. The diagnosis-related studies were evaluated using the QUADAS-2; all studies were evaluated using the phases classification criteria for image mining studies and the RQS tool by two reviewers.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies were included; thirteen papers (28.9%) focused on the differential diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioblastoma (GBM). Thirty-two (71.1%) studies were classified as discovery science according to the phase classification criteria for image mining studies. The mean RQS score of all studies was 14.2% (ranging from 0.0 to 40.3%), and 23 studies (51.1%) were given a score of < 10%.

CONCLUSION

The radiomics features could serve as diagnostic and prognostic indicators in lymphoma. However, the current conclusions should be interpreted with caution due to the suboptimal quality of the studies. In order to introduce radiomics into lymphoma clinical settings, the lesion segmentation and selection, the influence of the pathological pattern and the extraction of multiple modalities and multiple time points features need to be further studied.

KEY POINTS

• The radiomics approach may provide useful information for diagnosis, prediction of the therapy response, and outcome of lymphoma. • The quality of published radiomics studies in lymphoma has been suboptimal to date. • More studies are needed to examine lesion selection and segmentation, the influence of pathological patterns, and the extraction of multiple modalities and multiple time point features.

Texture analysis and multiple-instance learning for the classification of malignant lymphomas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Malignant lymphomas are cancers of the immune system and are characterized by enlarged lymph nodes that typically spread across many different sites. Many different histological subtypes exist, whose diagnosis is typically based on sampling (biopsy) of a single tumor site, whereas total body examinations with computed tomography and positron emission tomography, though not diagnostic, are able to provide a comprehensive picture of the patient. In this work, we exploit a data-driven approach based on multiple-instance learning algorithms and texture analysis features extracted from positron emission tomography, to predict differential diagnosis of the main malignant lymphomas subtypes.

METHODS

We exploit a multiple-instance learning setting where support vector machines and random forests are used as classifiers both at the level of single VOIs (instances) and at the level of patients (bags). We present results on two datasets comprising patients that suffer from four different types of malignant lymphomas, namely diffuse large B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma.

RESULTS

Despite the complexity of the task, experimental results show that, with sufficient data samples, some cancer subtypes, such as the Hodgkin's lymphoma, can be identified from texture information: in particular, we achieve a 97.0% of sensitivity (recall) and a 94.1% of predictive positive value (precision) on a dataset that consists in 60 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented study indicates that texture analysis features extracted from positron emission tomography, combined with multiple-instance machine learning algorithms, can be discriminating for different malignant lymphomas subtypes.

Marginal radiomics features as imaging biomarkers for pathological invasion in lung adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Lung adenocarcinomas which manifest as ground-glass nodules (GGNs) have different degrees of pathological invasion and differentiating among them is critical for treatment. Our goal was to evaluate the addition of marginal features to a baseline radiomics model on computed tomography (CT) images to predict the degree of pathologic invasiveness.

METHODS

We identified 236 patients from two cohorts (training, n = 189; validation, n = 47) who underwent surgery for GGNs. All GGNs were pathologically confirmed as adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), or invasive adenocarcinoma (IA). The regions of interest were semi-automatically annotated and 40 radiomics features were computed. We selected features using L1-norm regularization to build the baseline radiomics model. Additional marginal features were developed using the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of intratumoral intensities. An improved model was built combining the baseline model with CDF features. Three classifiers were tested for both models.

RESULTS

The baseline radiomics model included five features and resulted in an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8419 (training) and 0.9142 (validation) for the three classifiers. The second model, with the additional marginal features, resulted in AUCs of 0.8560 (training) and 0.9581 (validation). All three classifiers performed better with the added features. The support vector machine showed the most performance improvement (AUC improvement = 0.0790) and the best performance was achieved by the logistic classifier (validation AUC = 0.9825).

CONCLUSION

Our novel marginal features, when combined with a baseline radiomics model, can help differentiate IA from AIS and MIA on preoperative CT scans.

KEY POINTS

• Our novel marginal features could improve the existing radiomics model to predict the degree of pathologic invasiveness in lung adenocarcinoma.

Ability of Radiomics in Differentiation of Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma From Atypical Low-Grade Oligodendroglioma Using Machine-Learning Approach

Objectives: To investigate the ability of radiomics features from MRI in differentiating anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO) from atypical low-grade oligodendroglioma using machine-learning algorithms.

Methods: A total number of 101 qualified patients (50 participants with AO and 51 with atypical low-grade oligodendroglioma) were enrolled in this retrospective, single-center study. Forty radiomics features of tumor images derived from six matrices were extracted from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1C) images and fluid-attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. Three selection methods were performed to select the optimal features for classifiers, including distance correlation, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT). Then three machine-learning classifiers were adopted to generate discriminative models, including linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine, and random forest (RF). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to evaluate the discriminative performance of each model.

Results: Nine predictive models were established based on radiomics features from T1C images and FLAIR images. All of the classifiers represented feasible ability in differentiation, with AUC more than 0.840 when combined with suitable selection method. For models based on T1C images, the combination of LASSO and RF classifier represented the highest AUC of 0.904 in the validation group. For models based on FLAIR images, the combination of GBDT and RF classifier showed the highest AUC of 0.861 in the validation group.

Conclusion: Radiomics-based machine-learning approach could potentially serve as a feasible method in distinguishing AO from atypical low-grade oligodendroglioma.

Utility of flouro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnostic and staging evaluation of patients with primary CNS lymphoma

Aim: To prospectively assess the clinical utility of pretreatment flouro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) in patients with primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (PCNSL). Materials & methods: Patients with suspected/proven PCNSL underwent baseline whole-body 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Maximum standardized uptake value and tumor/normal tissue ratios were compared between CNS lymphoma and other histological diagnoses. Results: The mean maximum standardized uptake value (27.5 vs 18.2; p = 0.001) and mean tumor/normal tissue ratio (2.34 vs 1.53; p < 0.001) of CNS lymphoma was significantly higher than other histologic diagnoses. Five of 50 (10%) patients with biopsy-proven CNS lymphomas had pathologically increased FDG-uptake at extraneuraxial sites uncovering systemic lymphoma. Conclusion: Pretreatment whole-body 18F-FDG-PET/CT provides valuable complementary information in the diagnostic and staging evaluation of patients with PCNSL to guide therapeutic decision-making.

Differentiation of Pituitary Adenoma from Rathke Cleft Cyst: Combining MR Image Features with Texture Features

Objectives

To differentiate pituitary adenoma from Rathke cleft cyst in magnetic resonance (MR) scan by combing MR image features with texture features.

Methods

A total number of 133 patients were included in this study, 83 with pituitary adenoma and 50 with Rathke cleft cyst. Qualitative MR image features and quantitative texture features were evaluated by using the chi-square tests or Mann–Whitney U test. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate their ability as independent predictors. ROC analysis was conducted subsequently on the independent predictors to assess their practical value in discrimination and was used to investigate the association between two types of features.

Results

Signal intensity on the contrast-enhanced image was found to be the only significantly different MR image feature between the two lesions. Two texture features from the contrast-enhanced images (Histo-Skewness and GLCM-Correlation) were found to be the independent predictors in discrimination, of which AUC values were 0.80 and 0.75, respectively. Besides, the above two texture features (Histo-Skewness and GLCM-Contrast) were suggested to be associated with signal intensity on the contrast-enhanced image.

Conclusion

Signal intensity on the contrast-enhanced image was the most significant MR image feature in differentiation between pituitary adenoma and Rathke cleft cyst, and texture features also showed promising and practical ability in discrimination. Moreover, two types of features could be coordinated with each other.

Machine learning applications for the differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma on imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVEGlioblastoma (GBM) and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) are common intracranial pathologies encountered by neurosurgeons. They often may have similar radiological findings, making diagnosis difficult without surgical biopsy; however, management is quite different between these two entities. Recently, predictive analytics, including machine learning (ML), have garnered attention for their potential to aid in the diagnostic assessment of a variety of pathologies. Several ML algorithms have recently been designed to differentiate GBM from PCNSL radiologically with a high sensitivity and specificity. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the implementation of ML algorithms in differentiating GBM and PCNSL.METHODSThe authors performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to select and evaluate studies that included themes of ML and brain tumors. These studies were further narrowed down to focus on works published between January 2008 and May 2018 addressing the use of ML in training models to distinguish between GBM and PCNSL on radiological imaging. Outcomes assessed were test characteristics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).RESULTSEight studies were identified addressing use of ML in training classifiers to distinguish between GBM and PCNSL on radiological imaging. ML performed well with the lowest reported AUC being 0.878. In studies in which ML was directly compared with radiologists, ML performed better than or as well as the radiologists. However, when ML was applied to an external data set, it performed more poorly.CONCLUSIONSFew studies have applied ML to solve the problem of differentiating GBM from PCNSL using imaging alone. Of the currently published studies, ML algorithms have demonstrated promising results and certainly have the potential to aid radiologists with difficult cases, which could expedite the neurosurgical decision-making process. It is likely that ML algorithms will help to optimize neurosurgical patient outcomes as well as the cost-effectiveness of neurosurgical care if the problem of overfitting can be overcome.

18F-FDG-PET-based radiomics features to distinguish primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma

The differential diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is essential due to the difference in treatment strategies. This study retrospectively reviewed 77 patients (24 with lymphoma and 53 with GBM) to identify the stable and distinguishable characteristics of lymphoma and GBM in ¹⁸F-fluorodeocxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) images using a radiomics approach. Three groups of maps, namely, a standardized uptake value (SUV) map, an SUV map calibrated with the normal contralateral cortex (ncc) activity (SUV/ncc map), and an SUV map calibrated with the normal brain mean (nbm) activity (SUV/nbm map), were generated, and a total of 107 radiomics features were extracted from each SUV map. The margins of the ROI were adjusted to assess the stability of the features, and the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve of each feature was compared with the SUVmax to evaluate the distinguishability of the features. Nighty-five radiomics features from the SUV map were significantly different between lymphoma and GBM, 46 features were numeric stable after marginal adjustment, and 31 features displayed better performance than SUVmax. Features extracted from the SUV map demonstrated higher AUCs than features from the further calibrated maps. Tumors with solid metabolic patterns were also separately evaluated and revealed similar results. Thirteen radiomics features that were stable and distinguishable than SUVmax in every circumstance were selected to distinguish lymphoma from glioblastoma, and they suggested that lymphoma has a higher SUV in most interval segments and is more mathematically heterogeneous than GBM. This study suggested that ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-based radiomics is a reliable noninvasive method to distinguish lymphoma and GBM.

•

¹⁸F-FDG-PET is a reliable technique to differentiate primary CNS lymphoma from GBM.

•

Radiomics identify the stable and distinguishable characteristics of lymphoma and GBM.

•

¹⁸F-FDG-PET-based radiomics provide assistance to the preoperative diagnosis.

Texture Analysis in Cerebral Gliomas: A Review of the Literature

Texture analysis is a continuously evolving, noninvasive radiomics technique to quantify macroscopic tissue heterogeneity indirectly linked to microscopic tissue heterogeneity beyond human visual perception. In recent years, systemic oncologic applications of texture analysis have been increasingly explored. Here we discuss the basic concepts and methodologies of texture analysis, along with a review of various MR imaging texture analysis applications in glioma imaging. We also discuss MR imaging texture analysis limitations and the technical challenges that impede its widespread clinical implementation. With continued advancement in computational processing, MR imaging texture analysis could potentially develop into a valuable clinical tool in routine oncologic imaging.

Machine learning for semi-automated classification of glioblastoma, brain metastasis and central nervous system lymphoma using magnetic resonance advanced imaging

Background

Differentiating glioblastoma, brain metastasis, and central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can present a diagnostic dilemma due to the potential for overlapping imaging features. We investigate whether machine learning evaluation of multimodal MRI can reliably differentiate these entities.

Methods

Preoperative brain MRI including diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE), and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion in patients with glioblastoma, lymphoma, or metastasis were retrospectively reviewed. Perfusion maps (rCBV, rCBF), permeability maps (K-trans, Kep, Vp, Ve), ADC, T1C+ and T2/FLAIR images were coregistered and two separate volumes of interest (VOIs) were obtained from the enhancing tumor and non-enhancing T2 hyperintense (NET2) regions. The tumor volumes obtained from these VOIs were utilized for supervised training of support vector classifier (SVC) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) models. Validation of the trained models was performed on unlabeled cases using the leave-one-subject-out method. Head-to-head and multiclass models were created. Accuracies of the multiclass models were compared against two human interpreters reviewing conventional and diffusion-weighted MR images.

Results

Twenty-six patients enrolled with histopathologically-proven glioblastoma (n=9), metastasis (n=9), and CNS lymphoma (n=8) were included. The trained multiclass ML models discriminated the three pathologic classes with a maximum accuracy of 69.2% accuracy (18 out of 26; kappa 0.540, P=0.01) using an MLP trained with the VpNET2 tumor volumes. Human readers achieved 65.4% (17 out of 26) and 80.8% (21 out of 26) accuracies, respectively. Using the MLP VpNET2 model as a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) for cases in which the human reviewers disagreed with each other on the diagnosis resulted in correct diagnoses in 5 (19.2%) additional cases.

Conclusions

Our trained multiclass MLP using VpNET2 can differentiate glioblastoma, brain metastasis, and CNS lymphoma with modest diagnostic accuracy and provides approximately 19% increase in diagnostic yield when added to routine human interpretation.

Machine Learning in Neuro-Oncology: Can Data Analysis From 5346 Patients Change Decision-Making Paradigms?

BACKGROUND

Machine learning (ML) is an application of artificial intelligence (AI) that gives computer systems the ability to learn data, without being explicitly programmed. Currently, ML has been successfully used for optical character recognition, spam filtering, and face recognition. The aim of the present study was to review the current applications of ML in the field of neuro-oncology.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review using the PubMed and Cochrane databases using a keyword search for January 30, 2000 to March 31, 2018. The data were clustered for neuro-oncology scope of ML into 3 categories: patient outcome predictors, imaging analysis, and gene expression.

RESULTS

Data from 5346 patients in 29 studies were used to develop ML-based algorithms (MLBAs) in neuro-oncology. MLBAs were used to predict the outcomes for 2483 patients, with a sensitivity range of 78%-98% and specificity range of 76%-95%. In all studies, the MLBAs had greater accuracy than the conventional ones. MLBAs for image analysis showed accuracy in diagnosing low-grade versus high-grade gliomas, ranging from 80% to 93% and 90% for diagnosing high-grade glioma versus lymphoma. Seven studies used MLBAs to analyze gene expression in neuro-oncology.

CONCLUSIONS

MLBAs in neuro-oncology have been shown to predict patients' outcomes more accurately than conventional parameters in a retrospective analysis. If their high diagnostic accuracy in imaging analysis and detection of somatic mutations are corroborated in prospective studies, the use of tissue diagnosis or liquid biopsy might be curtailed. Finally, MLBAs are promising to help guide targeted therapy, can lead to personalized medicine, and open areas of study in the cancer cellular signaling system, not otherwise known.

Differentiation Researches on the Meningioma Subtypes by Radiomics from Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Preliminary Study

BACKGROUND

Meningioma subtypes are one of the most common key points to the treatment and prognosis of patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differential diagnostic value of radiomics features on meningioma.

METHODS

A total of 241 patients with meningioma who had undergone tumor resection were randomly selected including 80 with meningothelial meningioma, 80 with fibrous meningioma, and 81 with transitional meningioma. These meningiomas were divided into 4 groups including: meningothelial versus fibrous (group 1), fibrous versus transitional (group 2), meningothelial versus transitional (group 3), and meningothelial versus fibrous versus transitional (group 4). All patients were examined using the same magnetic resonance scanner (GE 3.0 T) and the preoperative contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images were available. Radiomics features from the contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images of 241 patients were evaluated by 2 experienced radiology specialists.

RESULTS

A total of 385 radiomics features were extracted from the images of each patient. Several preprocessing methods were applied on the radiomics dataset to reduce the redundancy and highlight differences between different meningioma before the Fisher discrimination analysis was adopted and leave one out cross validation methods were used for the model validation. The differentiation accuracies of the Fisher discriminant analysis model for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 99.4%, 98.8%, 100% and 100%, respectively; leave one out cross validation method was achieved for group 1, 2, 3, and 4 with the accuracies of 91.3%, 95.0%, 100%, and 94.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics features and the combined Fisher discriminant analysis could provide satisfactory performance in the preoperative differential diagnosis of meningioma subtypes and enable the potential ability for clinical application.

Magnetic resonance texture analysis utility in differentiating intraparenchymal neurosarcoidosis from primary central nervous system lymphoma: a preliminary analysis

PURPOSE

Neurosarcoidosis and primary central nervous system lymphomas, although distinct disease entities, can both have overlapping neuroimaging findings. The purpose of our preliminary study was to assess if magnetic resonance texture analysis can differentiate parenchymal mass-like neurosarcoidosis granulomas from primary central nervous system lymphomas.

METHODS

A total of nine patients was evaluated, four with parenchymal neurosarcoidosis granulomas and five with primary central nervous system lymphomas. Magnetic resonance texture analysis was performed with commercial software using a filtration histogram technique. Texture features of different sizes and variations in signal intensity were extracted at six different spatial scale filters, followed by feature quantification using statistical and histogram parameters and 36 features were analysed for each sequence (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, diffusion-weighted, apparent diffusion coefficient, T1-post contrast). The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate the differences between different texture parameters.

RESULTS

The differences in distribution of entropy on T2-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient and T1-weighted post-contrast images were statistically significant on all spatial scale filters. Magnetic resonance texture analysis using medium and coarse spatial scale filters was especially useful in discriminating neurosarcoidosis from primary central nervous system lymphomas for mean, mean positive pixels, kurtosis, and skewness on diffusion-weighted imaging ( P < 0.004-0.030). At spatial scale filter 5, entropy on T2-weighted imaging ( P = 0.001) was the most useful discriminator with a cut-off value of 6.12 ( P = 0.001, area under the curve (AUC)-1, sensitivity (Sn)-100%, specificity (Sp)-100%), followed by kurtosis and skewness on diffusion-weighted imaging with a cut-off value of -0.565 ( P = 0.011, AUC-0.97, Sn-100%, Sp-83%) and-0.365 ( P = 0.008, AUC-0.98, Sn-100%, Sp-100%) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Filtration histogram-based magnetic resonance texture analysis appears to be a promising modality to distinguish parenchymal neurosarcoidosis granulomas from primary central nervous system lymphomas.

Utility of arterial spin labelling MRI for discriminating atypical high-grade glioma from primary central nervous system lymphoma

AIM

To evaluate the ability of arterial spin labelling (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) from atypical high-grade glioma (HGG), as well as exploring the underlying pathological mechanisms.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-three patients with PCNSL and 17 patients with atypical HGG who underwent ASL-MRI were identified retrospectively. Absolute cerebral blood flow (aCBF) and normalised cerebral blood flow (nCBF) values were obtained, and were compared between PCNSL and atypical HGG using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The performance in discriminating between PCNSL and atypical HGG was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristics analysis and area-under-the-curve (AUC) values for aCBF and nCBF. The correlation between microvessel density (MVD) and aCBF was determined by Spearman's correlation analysis.

RESULTS

Atypical HGG demonstrated significantly higher aCBF, nCBF, and MVD values than PCNSL (p<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of discriminating PCNSL from atypical HGG showed AUC=0.877 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.735-0.959) for aCBF, and AUC=0.836 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.685-0.934) for nCBF. There was a moderate positive correlation between aCBF values of region of interest (ROI >30 mm²) in the enhanced area and MVD values (rho=0.579, p=0.0001), and a strong positive correlation between aCBF values MVD based on "point-to-point biopsy" (rho=0.83, p=0.0029). Interobserver agreements for aCBF and nCBF were excellent (ICC >0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

ASL perfusion MRI is a useful imaging technique for the discrimination between atypical HGG and PCNSL, which may be determined by the difference of MVD between them.

Machine Learning-based Texture Analysis of Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging to Differentiate between Glioblastoma and Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Purpose:

Although advanced MRI techniques are increasingly available, imaging differentiation between glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is sometimes confusing. We aimed to evaluate the performance of image classification by support vector machine, a method of traditional machine learning, using texture features computed from contrast-enhanced T₁-weighted images.

Methods:

This retrospective study on preoperative brain tumor MRI included 76 consecutives, initially treated patients with glioblastoma (n = 55) or PCNSL (n = 21) from one institution, consisting of independent training group (n = 60: 44 glioblastomas and 16 PCNSLs) and test group (n = 16: 11 glioblastomas and 5 PCNSLs) sequentially separated by time periods. A total set of 67 texture features was computed on routine contrast-enhanced T₁-weighted images of the training group, and the top four most discriminating features were selected as input variables to train support vector machine classifiers. These features were then evaluated on the test group with subsequent image classification.

Results:

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves on the training data was calculated at 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96–1.00) for the classifier with a Gaussian kernel and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.77–0.95) for the classifier with a linear kernel. On the test data, both of the classifiers showed prediction accuracy of 75% (12/16) of the test images.

Conclusions:

Although further improvement is needed, our preliminary results suggest that machine learning-based image classification may provide complementary diagnostic information on routine brain MRI.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma and atypical glioblastoma: Differentiation using radiomics approach

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance (MR) radiomics-based machine-learning algorithms in differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) from non-necrotic atypical glioblastoma (GBM).

METHODS

Seventy-seven patients (54 individuals with PCNSL and 23 with non-necrotic atypical GBM), diagnosed from January 2009 to April 2017, were enrolled in this retrospective study. A total of 6,366 radiomics features, including shape, volume, first-order, texture, and wavelet-transformed features, were extracted from multi-parametric (post-contrast T1- and T2-weighted, and fluid attenuation inversion recovery images) and multiregional (enhanced and non-enhanced) tumour volumes. These features were subjected to recursive feature elimination and random forest (RF) analysis with nested cross-validation. The diagnostic abilities of a radiomics machine-learning classifier, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and three readers, who independently classified the tumours based on conventional MR sequences, were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Areas under the ROC curves (AUC) of the radiomics classifier, ADC value, and the radiologists were compared.

RESULTS

The mean AUC of the radiomics classifier was 0.921 (95 % CI 0.825-0.990). The AUCs of the three readers and ADC were 0.707 (95 % CI 0.622-0.793), 0.759 (95 %CI 0.656-0.861), 0.695 (95 % CI 0.590-0.800) and 0.684 (95 % CI0.560-0.809), respectively. The AUC of the radiomics-based classifier was significantly higher than those of the three readers and ADC (p< 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Large-scale radiomics with a machine-learning algorithm can be useful for differentiating PCNSL from atypical GBM, and yields a better diagnostic performance than human radiologists and ADC values.

KEY POINTS

• Machine-learning algorithm radiomics can help to differentiate primary central PCNSL from GBM. • This approach yields a higher diagnostic accuracy than visual analysis by radiologists. • Radiomics can strengthen radiologists' diagnostic decisions whenever conventional MRI sequences are available.