Fast Stent Retrieval during Mechanical Thrombectomy Improves Recanalization in Patients with the Negative Susceptibility Vessel Sign

Access to and application of recanalizing therapies for severe acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion

BACKGROUND

Groundbreaking study results since 2014 have dramatically changed the therapeutic options in acute therapy for severe ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). The scientifically proven advances in stroke imaging and thrombectomy techniques have allowed to offer the optimal version or combination of best medical and interventional therapy to the selected patient, yielding favorable or even excellent clinical outcomes within time windows unheard of before. The provision of the best possible individual therapy has become a guideline-based gold standard, but remains a great challenge. With geographic, regional, cultural, economic and resource differences worldwide, optimal local solutions have to be strived for.

AIM

This standard operation procedure (SOP) is aimed to give a suggestion of how to give patients access to and apply modern recanalizing therapy for acute ischemic stroke caused by LVO.

METHOD

The SOP was developed based on current guidelines, the evidence from the most recent trials and the experience of authors who have been involved in the above-named development at different levels.

RESULTS

This SOP is meant to be a comprehensive, yet not too detailed template to allow for freedom in local adaption. It comprises all relevant stages in providing care to the patient with severe ischemic stroke such as suspicion and alarm, prehospital acute measures, recognition and grading, transport, emergency room workup, selective cerebral imaging, differential treatment by recanalizing therapies (intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular stroke treatmet, or combined), complications, stroke unit and neurocritical care.

CONCLUSIONS

The challenge of giving patients access to and applying recanalizing therapies in severe ischemic stroke may be facilitated by a systematic, SOP-based approach adapted to local settings.

First Experience with the Nimbus Stentretriever

Purpose

To share our first experience with the Nimbus stentretriever, a multizone device designed to assist neurointerventionalists in handling fibrin-rich clots in endovascular stroke treatment.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who were treated with the Nimbus stentretriever at our high-volume stroke center between May 2021 and May 2022. We evaluated the number of passes before Nimbus was used, the number of passes with nimbus, as well as the recanalization success before and after Nimbus according to the modified treatment in cerebral ischemia (mTICI) scale. Also, patient characteristics, procedural times and clinical outcomes were documented.

Results

A total of 21 consecutive patients were included in the study. An mTICI 2b/3 could be achieved in 76.2% and mTICI 2c/3 could be achieved in 57.1%. The mean number of passes was 3.4 before the use of Nimbus, 2.2 with Nimbus, and 5.4 for all passes with and without Nimbus and 4 occlusions (19.0%) were successfully recanalized with direct aspiration after the use of Nimbus. We observed seven subarachnoid hemorrhages (33.3%) and two cases of vasospasm.

Conclusion

In our series, the use of Nimbus resulted in successful recanalization in half of the patients after otherwise unsuccessful thrombectomy maneuvers; therefore, it should be considered as a rescue option if the maneuver with conventional stent retrievers was unsuccessful.

Susceptibility vessel sign as a predictor for recanalization and clinical outcome in acute ischaemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic values of susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) on T2*-weighted MRI using GRE and SWI sequences for recanalization status and clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischaemic stroke undergoing different therapies.

METHODS

Literature search on PubMed, EMBASE databases and other sources from inception up to 01 June 2021 was conducted. 11 studies which reported SVS, recanalization and clinical outcomes were included in qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Pooled analysis demonstrated significant association between good clinical outcome and SVS-positive patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (RR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.07-1.67, p = 0.01), which is in line with higher recanalization rate in SVS-positive patients who were treated with mechanical thrombectomy compared to intravenous thrombolysis only. No statistically significant association was demonstrated between presence of SVS and successful recanalization, likely due to limitations in the recruited studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Presence of SVS in patients with acute ischaemic stroke who underwent mechanical thrombectomy is associated with good clinical outcome. SVS-positive patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy also shows better recanalization rate comparing to intravenous thrombolysis only, although not statistically significant. MRI assessment of the clot content using SVS is useful in selection of reperfusion strategy for acute ischaemic stroke and prognostication.