Frequency and predictors of poststroke epilepsy after mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke: results from a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Poststroke epilepsy (PSE) represents an important complication of stroke. Data regarding the frequency and predictors of PSE in patients with large-vessel occlusion stroke receiving mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are scarce. Furthermore, information on acute and preexisting lesion characteristics on brain MRI has not yet been systematically considered in risk prediction of PSE. This study thus aims to assess PSE risk after acute ischemic stroke treated with MT, based on clinical and MRI features.

METHODS

In this multicenter study from two tertiary stroke centers, we included consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients who had received MT for acute intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO) between 2011 and 2017, in whom post-interventional brain MRI and long term-follow-up data were available. Infarct size, affected cerebrovascular territory, hemorrhagic complications and chronic cerebrovascular disease features were assessed on MRI (blinded to clinical information). The primary outcome was the occurrence of PSE (> 7 days after stroke onset) assessed by systematic follow-up via phone interview or electronic records.

RESULTS

Our final study cohort comprised 348 thrombectomy patients (median age: 67 years, 45% women) with a median long-term follow-up of 78 months (range 0-125). 32 patients (9%) developed PSE after a median of 477 days (range 9-2577 days). In univariable analyses, larger postinterventional infarct size, infarct location in the parietal, frontal or temporal lobes and cerebral microbleeds were associated with PSE. Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed larger infarct size (HR 3.49; 95% CI 1.67-7.30) and presence of cerebral microbleeds (HR 2.56; 95% CI 1.18-5.56) as independent predictors of PSE.

CONCLUSION

In our study, patients with large vessel occlusion stroke receiving MT had a 9% prevalence of PSE over a median follow-up period of 6.5 years. Besides larger infarct size, presence of cerebral microbleeds on brain MRI predicted PSE occurrence.

Access to and application of recanalizing therapies for severe acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion

BACKGROUND

Groundbreaking study results since 2014 have dramatically changed the therapeutic options in acute therapy for severe ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). The scientifically proven advances in stroke imaging and thrombectomy techniques have allowed to offer the optimal version or combination of best medical and interventional therapy to the selected patient, yielding favorable or even excellent clinical outcomes within time windows unheard of before. The provision of the best possible individual therapy has become a guideline-based gold standard, but remains a great challenge. With geographic, regional, cultural, economic and resource differences worldwide, optimal local solutions have to be strived for.

AIM

This standard operation procedure (SOP) is aimed to give a suggestion of how to give patients access to and apply modern recanalizing therapy for acute ischemic stroke caused by LVO.

METHOD

The SOP was developed based on current guidelines, the evidence from the most recent trials and the experience of authors who have been involved in the above-named development at different levels.

RESULTS

This SOP is meant to be a comprehensive, yet not too detailed template to allow for freedom in local adaption. It comprises all relevant stages in providing care to the patient with severe ischemic stroke such as suspicion and alarm, prehospital acute measures, recognition and grading, transport, emergency room workup, selective cerebral imaging, differential treatment by recanalizing therapies (intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular stroke treatmet, or combined), complications, stroke unit and neurocritical care.

CONCLUSIONS

The challenge of giving patients access to and applying recanalizing therapies in severe ischemic stroke may be facilitated by a systematic, SOP-based approach adapted to local settings.

Effect of intra-arterial nimodipine on iatrogenic vasospasms during endovascular stroke treatment - angiographic resolution and infarct growth in follow-up imaging

PURPOSE

The treatment of vasospasms during endovascular stroke treatment (EST) with intra-arterial nimodipine (NM) is routinely performed. However, the efficacy of resolving iatrogenic vasospasms during the angiographic intervention and the infarct development in follow-up imaging after EST has not been studied yet.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center analysis of patients receiving EST for anterior circulation vessel occlusion between 01/2015 and 12/2021. The primary endpoint was ASPECTS in follow-up imaging. Secondary endpoints were the clinical outcome (combined endpoint NIHSS 24 h after EST and difference between modified Rankin Scale (mRS) before stroke and at discharge (delta mRS)) and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in follow-up imaging. Patients with vasospasms receiving NM (NM+) or not (NM-) were compared in univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Vasospasms occurred in 79/1283 patients (6.2%), who consecutively received intra-arterial NM during EST. The targeted vasospasm angiographically resolved in 84% (66/79) under NM therapy. ASPECTS was lower in follow-up imaging after vasospasms and NM-treatment (NM - 7 (6-9), NM + 6 (4.5-8), p = 0.013) and the clinical outcome was worse (NIHSS 24 h after EST was higher in patients treated with NM (median, IQR; NM+: 14, 5-21 vs. NM-: 9, 3-18; p = 0.004), delta-mRS was higher in the NM + group (median, IQR; NM+: 3, 1-4 vs. NM-: 2, 1-2; p = 0.011)). Any ICH (NM+: 27/79, 34.2% vs. NM-: 356/1204, 29.6%; p = 0.386) and symptomatic ICH (NM+: 2/79, 2.5% vs. NM-: 21/1204, 1.7%; p = 0.609) was equally distributed between groups.

CONCLUSION

Intra-arterial nimodipine during EST resolves iatrogenic vasospasms efficiently during EST without increasing intracranial hemorrhage rates. However, patients with vasospasms and NM treatment show higher infarct growth resulting in lower ASPECTS in follow-up imaging.

Radiation exposure in endovascular stroke treatment of acute basilar artery occlusions-a matched-pair analysis

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the radiation exposure in endovascular stroke treatment (EST) of acute basilar artery occlusions (BAO) and compare it with radiation exposure of EST for embolic middle cerebral artery occlusions (MCAO).

Methods

In this retrospective analysis of an institutional review board−approved prospective stroke database of a comprehensive stroke center, we focused on radiation exposure (as per dose area product in Gy × cm², median (IQR)), procedure time, and fluoroscopy time (in minutes, median [IQR]) in patients receiving EST for BAO. Patients who received EST for BAO were matched case by case with patients who received EST for MCAO according to number of thrombectomy attempts, target vessel reperfusion result, and thrombectomy technique.

Results

Overall 180 patients (n = 90 in each group) were included in this analysis. General anesthesia was conducted more often during EST of BAO (BAO: 75 (83.3%); MCAO: 18 (31.1%), p < 0.001). Procedure time (BAO: 31 (20–43); MCAO: 27 (18–38); p value 0.226) and fluoroscopy time (BAO: 29 (20–59); MCAO: 29 (17–49), p value 0.317) were comparable. Radiation exposure was significantly higher in patients receiving EST for BAO (BAO: 123.4 (78.7–204.2); MCAO: 94.3 (65.5–163.7), p value 0.046), which represents an increase by 23.7%.

Conclusion

Endovascular stroke treatment of basilar artery occlusions is associated with a higher radiation exposure compared with treatment of middle cerebral artery occlusions.

The KEEP SIMPLEST Study: Improving In-House Delays and Periinterventional Management in Stroke Thrombectomy-A Matched Pair Analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although the treatment window for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has been extended in recent years, it has been proven that recanalizing treatment must be administered as soon as possible. We present a new standard operating procedure (SOP) to reduce in-house delay, standardize periinterventional management and improve patient safety during MT.

METHODS

KEep Evaluating Protocol Simplification In Managing Periinterventional Light Sedation for Endovascular Stroke Treatment (KEEP SIMPLEST) was a prospective, single-center observational study aimed to compare aspects of periinterventional management in AIS patients treated according to our new SOP using a combination of esketamine and propofol with patients having been randomized into conscious sedation (CS) in the Sedation versus Intubation for Endovascular Stroke TreAtment (SIESTA) trial. Primary outcome was early neurological improvement at 24h using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and secondary outcomes were door-to-recanalization, recanalization grade, conversion rate and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months.

RESULTS

Door-to-recanalization time (128.6 ± 69.47 min vs. 156.8 ± 75.91 min; p = 0.02), mean duration of MT (92.01 ± 52 min vs. 131.9 ± 64.03 min; p < 0.001), door-to-first angiographic image (51.61 ± 31.7 min vs. 64.23 ± 21.53 min; p = 0.003) and computed tomography-to-first angiographic image time (31.61 ± 20.6 min vs. 44.61 ± 19.3 min; p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in the group treated under the new SOP. There were no differences in early neurological improvement, mRS at 3 months or other secondary outcomes between the groups. Conversion rates of CS to general anesthesia were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

An SOP using a novel sedation regimen and optimization of equipment and procedures directed at a leaner, more integrative and compact periinterventional management can reduce in-house treatment delays significantly in stroke patients receiving thrombectomy in light sedation and demonstrated the safety and feasibility of our improved approach.

Effect of General Anaesthesia versus Conscious Sedation on Clinical and Procedural Outcome in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Stroke Treatment: A Matched-Pair Analysis

INTRODUCTION

General anaesthesia (GA) during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) might lead to an inferior clinical outcome compared to conscious sedation (CS). It was hypothesised that using CS might avoid a critical drop in cerebral perfusion, shorten the time of the intervention and therefore might result in better clinical outcome. In this study, we compared the procedural and clinical results of patients who underwent MT under GA or CS at two tertiary neuro-vascular centres on the basis of a matched-pair analysis.

METHODS

Using a matched-pair approach, we compared the data of 56 patients that were treated under CS at centre A (n = 28) with selected patients who were treated under GA at the centre B (n = 28). Patients were matched for age, sex, site of vessel occlusion, NIHSS at admission (±3 points), time from symptom onset to initial stroke imaging, intravenous-lysis and co-morbidities. All patients had an ASPECT-score of ≥8. To exclude the effect of technical failures, only patients with successful recanalization of the occluded vessel (TICI 2b and 3) were included into the study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with early good clinical outcome after MT, defined by a modified Ranking Scale (mRS)-score ≤2 at discharge. Secondary endpoints were the time from symptom onset to the start of the procedure, the duration of the procedure and the rate of procedural complications.

RESULTS

There were no differences concerning gender, age, the site of vessel occlusion and the degree of stroke severity at baseline. The proportion of patients with an early good clinical outcome (mRS ≤2 at discharge) was 60.4% (17/28) in both groups. The time from symptom onset to the start of the procedure was shorter at centre B, while the duration of the procedure was significantly faster at A, resulting in an overall time from symptom onset to complete recanalization of 152.2 ± 68.0 min for patients treated at centre A and 171.1 ± 43.5 min for patients at centre B (ns).

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed no differences in the investigated clinical outcome for patients undergoing endovascular stroke treatment under GA versus CS.

Heparin during endovascular stroke treatment seems safe

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

the effect of intravenous heparin during mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke is not clear. We aimed to study efficacy and safety of heparin use during endovascular stroke treatment in a real-world setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

patients with anterior circulation stroke were divided, based on the use of intraprocedural heparin, in those treated and those untreated. Main outcomes were successful reperfusion defined as a TICI Score ≥ 2b, 3-month functional independence defined as a modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality.

RESULTS

361 patients were eligible for analysis; 200 were (H+) and 161 (H-). The (H-) group showed higher age and ASPECTS (74 ± 14 vs. 68.9 ± 12.2; P = 0.001; 8 ± 1.6 vs. 7.4 ± 2.1; P = 0.009) without differences in vascular risk factors. Heparin untreated patients showed a shorter onset-to-reperfusion time (271 ± 57.6 min vs. 309 ± 102.2 min; P < 0.001). No differences were found in 3-month functional independence, sICH and mortality whereas the rate of successful reperfusion was higher in the (H-) group. After logistic regression analysis successful reperfusion was independently associated with CT ASPECTS (OR: 1.16; 95%CI 1.01-1.35; P = 0.040) but inversely associated with the use of heparin (OR: 0.48; 95% CI 0.24-0.98; P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Heparin use during mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke in a real world setting is safe.

[Peri-interventional management of acute endovascular stroke treatment]

Due to the ground breaking consistent evidence that supports the effect of endovascular stroke treatment (EST), many acute care hospitals and stroke centers will have to be prepared to provide this treatment in an optimal way within the coming years. In addition to the intervention itself, patient preparation, stabilization and monitoring during the treatment as well as the aftercare represent significant challenges and have mostly not yet been sufficiently investigated. Under these aspects, the questions of optimal sedation and airway management have received the highest attention. Based on retrospective study results it already seems to be justified, respecting certain criteria, to prefer EST with the patient under conscious sedation (CS) in comparison to general anesthesia (GA) and to only switch to GA in cases of emergency until this question has been clarified by prospective studies. This and other aspects of peri-interventional management, such as logistics, monitoring, blood pressure, ventilation settings, postprocedural steps of intensive or stroke unit care and imaging follow-up are summarized in this overview. The clinical and radiological selection of patients and thus the decision for intervention or technical aspects of the intervention itself will not be part of this article.