Comparison of Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging and Single-Shot TSE DWI for Cholesteatoma Diagnostics

Diagnostic performance of multishot echo-planar imaging (RESOLVE) and non-echo-planar imaging (HASTE) diffusion-weighted imaging in cholesteatoma with an emphasis on signal intensity ratio measurement

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of multishot echo-planar imaging (EPI) [RESOLVE (RS)] and non-EPI (HASTE) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in detecting cholesteatoma (CHO), and to explore the role of signal intensity (SI) ratio measurements in addressing diagnostic challenges.

METHODS

We analyzed RS-EPI and non-EPI DWI images from 154 patients who had undergone microscopic middle ear surgery, with pathological confirmation of their diagnoses. Two radiologists, referred to as Reader A and Reader B, independently reviewed the images without prior knowledge of the outcomes. Their evaluation focused on lesion location, T1-weighted (T1W) signal characteristics, and contrast enhancement in temporal bone magnetic resonance imaging. Key parameters included lesion hyperintensity, size, SI, SI ratio, and susceptibility artifact scores across both imaging modalities.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 62.3% (96/154) were diagnosed with CHO, whereas 37.7% (58/154) were found to have non-CHO conditions. In RS-EPI DWI, Reader A achieved 89.6% sensitivity, 79.3% specificity, 87.8% positive predictive value (PPV), and 82.1% negative predictive value (NPV). Non-EPI DWI presented similar results with sensitivities of 89.6%, specificities of 86.2%, PPVs of 91.5%, and NPVs of 83.3%. Reader B’s results for RS-EPI DWI were 82.3% sensitivity, 84.5% specificity, 89.8% PPV, and 74.2% NPV, whereas, for non-EPI DWI, they were 86.5% sensitivity, 89.7% specificity, 93.3% PPV, and 80% NPV. The interobserver agreement was excellent (RS-EPI, κ: 0.84; non-EPI, κ: 0.91). The SI ratio measurements were consistently higher in non-EPI DWI (Reader A: 2.51, Reader B: 2.46) for the CHO group compared with RS-EPI. The SI ratio cut-off (>1.98) effectively differentiated hyperintense lesions between CHO and non-CHO groups, demonstrating 82.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with an area under the curve of 0.901 (95% confidence interval: 0.815–0.956; P < 0.001). Susceptibility artifact scores averaged 1.18 ± 0.7 (Reader A) and 1.04 ± 0.41 (Reader B) in RS-EPI, with non-EPI DWI recording a mean score of 0.

CONCLUSION

Both RS-EPI and non-EPI DWI exhibited high diagnostic accuracy for CHO. While RS-EPI DWI cannot replace non-EPI DWI, their combined use improves sensitivity. SI ratio measurement in non-EPI DWI was particularly beneficial in complex diagnostic scenarios.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study refines CHO diagnostic protocols by showcasing the diagnostic capabilities of both RS-EPI and non-EPI DWI and highlighting the utility of SI measurements as a diagnostic tool. These findings may reduce false positives and aid in more accurate treatment planning, offering substantial insights for clinicians in managing CHO.

Readout-Segmented Echoplanar (RESOLVE) Diffusion-Weighted Imaging on 3T MRI in Detection of Cholesteatoma-Our Experience

Background  Several research studies have demonstrated the utility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in detecting middle ear cholesteatomas, especially with the non-echoplanar imaging (non-EPI) DWI technique. REadout Segmentation Of Long Variable Echo trains (RESOLVE), a multishot-EPI DWI, has better spatial resolution at a thinner section acquisition with reduced image distortion compared to the single-shot-EPI DWI technique. Purpose  In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic ability of RESOLVE -DWI in middle ear cholesteatomas with surgical and histopathological support. Patients and Methods  Fifty patients with clinical suspicion of primary cholesteatoma or postoperative recurrence were subjected to routine sequences and RESOLVE-DWI on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty-eight patients had unilateral disease, while 12 patients had bilateral disease. The bilateral temporal bones of 50 patients were evaluated on MRI. The results attained by RESOLVE-DWI were correlated with intraoperative and histopathological findings. Results  RESOLVE-DWI truly detected 55 of the 58 surgically proven cholesteatomas. RESOLVE-DWI could not detect three cholesteatoma lesions due to their small size and falsely diagnosed one case each of impacted wax and non-cholesteatomatous otitis media as cholesteatoma. With a 95% confidence interval, RESOLVE-DWI showed 94.8% sensitivity, 95.2% specificity, 96% positive predictive value, 93% negative predictive value, and 95% diagnostic accuracy in cholesteatoma detection. Conclusion  RESOLVE-DWI is a sensitive and specific DWI technique for detecting middle ear cholesteatoma. However, RESOLVE-DWI has limitations in the diagnosis of small (<3 mm) cholesteatomas.

Comparison of Diagnostic Performance and Image Quality between Topup-Corrected and Standard Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Cholesteatoma Diagnostics

This study compares the diagnostic performance and image quality of single-shot turbo spin-echo DWI (tseDWI), standard readout-segmented DWI (rsDWI), and a modified rsDWI version (topupDWI) for cholesteatoma diagnostics. Thirty-four patients with newly suspected unilateral cholesteatoma were examined on a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by calculating and comparing the sensitivity and specificity using histopathological results as the standard of reference. Image quality was independently reviewed by two readers using a 5-point Likert scale evaluating image distortions, susceptibility artifacts, image resolution, lesion conspicuity, and diagnostic confidence. Twenty-five cholesteatomas were histologically confirmed after surgery and originated in the study group. TseDWI showed the highest sensitivity with 96% (95% confidence interval (CI): 88–100%), followed by topupDWI with 92% (95% CI: 81–100%) for both readers. The sensitivity for rsDWI was 76% (95% CI: 59–93%) for reader 1 and 84% (95% CI: 70–98%) for reader 2, respectively. Both tseDWI and topupDWI revealed a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 66–100%) and rsDWI of 89% (95% CI: 52–100%). Both tseDWI and topupDWI showed fewer image distortions and susceptibility artifacts compared to rsDWI. Image resolution was consistently rated best for topupDWI, followed by rsDWI, which both outperformed tseDWI. TopupDWI and tseDWI showed comparable results for lesions’ conspicuity and diagnostic confidence, both outperforming rsDWI. Modified readout-segmented DWI using the topup-correction method is preferable to standard rsDWI and may be regarded as an accurate alternative to single-shot turbo spin-echo DWI in cholesteatoma diagnostics.

Localization Evaluation of Primary Middle Ear Cholesteatoma With Fusion of Turbo Spin-Echo Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and High-Resolution Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to evaluate the application of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging (TSE-DWI) fusion imaging for localization of middle ear cholesteatomas.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with clinically suspected middle ear cholesteatomas were enrolled prospectively. Ear TSE-DWI and HRCT scans were performed using a postprocessing workstation to generate a TSE-DWI-CT fusion image. Subsequently, all the enrolled patients received surgical treatment. According to the STAM system (difficult access sites [S], the tympanic cavity [T], the attic [A], and the mastoid [M]), the agreement between the localization of lesions evaluated by HRCT, TSE-DWI, and TSE-DWI-CT fusion images and the intraoperatively recorded localization were computed using Cohen κ statistic.

RESULTS

Based on the pathological results, the enrolled patients were divided into a cholesteatoma (n = 50) and a noncholesteatoma group (n = 36). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for diagnosis of cholesteatoma with TSE-DWI-CT fusion imaging was identical to that using the TSE-DWI images (0.924 vs 0.924, P > 0.05), but was significantly higher than that with HRCT imaging (0.924 vs 0.767, P = 0.0005). Furthermore, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of TSE-DWI-CT fusion imaging for cholesteatomas were 96.0% and 88.9%, respectively. Depending on whether the cholesteatoma extended to the mastoid, TSE-DWI-CT fusion imaging demonstrated good agreement with the intraoperative record for localization of lesions (κ = 0.808) and had a high accuracy of localization by the STAM system.

CONCLUSIONS

Turbo spin-echo-DWI-CT fusion images have a very high diagnostic value for the preoperative localization of cholesteatomas.

Performance of 2D BLADE turbo gradient- and spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging in the quantitative diagnosis of recurrent temporal bone cholesteatoma

BACKGROUND

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has become an important tool for the detection of cholesteatoma. The purpose of this study was to explore the value of 2D BLADE turbo gradient- and spin-echo imaging (TGSE BLADE) DWI in the quantitative diagnosis of recurrent temporal bone cholesteatoma (CS).

METHODS

From March 2018 to October 2021, 67 patients with suspected recurrence of temporal bone CS after assessment by clinical otorhinolaryngologists who had undergone previous ear surgery for CS were prospectively evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Two radiologist assessed images independently. Quantitative parameters such as signal intensity ratio (SIR) calculated using, as a reference, the inferior temporal cortex (SIRT) and the background noise (SIRN), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, and ADC ratio (with pons as reference) measured on TGSE BLADE sequences were assessed. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal threshold and diagnostic performance for diagnosing recurrent CS were determined. Pair-wise comparison of the ROC curves was performed using the area under the ROC curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Finally, 44 patients were included in this study, including 25 CS and 19 non-cholesteatoma (NCS). Mean SIRT and mean SIRN on TGSE BLADE DWI were significantly higher for CS than NCS lesions (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, mean ADC values and mean ADC ratios on ADC maps were significantly lower in the CS group than in the NCS group (p < 0.001). According to ROC analysis, the diagnostic efficacy of quantitative parameters such as SIRT (AUC = 0.967), SIRN (AUC = 0.979), ADC value (AUC = 1.0), and ADC ratio (AUC = 0.983) was significantly better than that of qualitative DWI (AUC = 0.867; p = 0.007, 0.009, 0.011 and 0.037, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Residual/recurrent temporal bone CS can be accurately detected using quantitative evaluation of TGSE BLADE DWI.

Accuracy of 2D BLADE Turbo Gradient- and Spin-Echo Diffusion Weighted Imaging for the Diagnosis of Primary Middle Ear Cholesteatoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 2D BLADE turbo gradient- and spin-echo diffusion weighted imaging (TGSE BLADE DWI) for primary middle ear cholesteatoma diagnosis, using qualitative and quantitative methods.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

Participants included those with suspected primary middle ear cholesteatoma after assessment by clinical otorhinolaryngologists combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. Finally, of the 85 ears from 65 patients enrolled in the study, 73 had cholesteatoma, and 12 had otitis media.

INTERVENTION

Two radiologists independently assessed images and measured apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were evaluated. Kappa (k) statistics, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test, the independent t test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used for statistical analysis. Pair-wise comparison of the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was also performed using the Delong test.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Imaging and histopathologic findings.

RESULTS

The mean ADC value of cholesteatoma group (mean, 0.923 ± 0.246 × 10 -3 mm 2 /s) was significantly lower than that of noncholesteatoma group (mean, 1.744 ± 0.205 × 10 -3 mm 2 /s; p < 0.001). In ≤3 mm cholesteatoma group, the AUC of qualitative DWI was 0.846; the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosing cholesteatoma were 69.23%, 100%, and 84%, respectively; while the AUC of quantitative diagnosis was significantly increased to 1.0 ( p = 0.0209); and based on the optimal threshold of ADC, ≤1.352 × 10 -3 mm 2 /s, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy improved to 100%. For >3 mm cholesteatoma group, there were no significant differences in diagnostic performance. Excellent interobserver agreement and ICC for the qualitative and quantitative evaluations (k = 0.90 and ICC = 0.80, respectively) was noted between reviewers.

CONCLUSION

TGSE BLADE DWI is useful for the detection of primary middle ear cholesteatomas, especially ≤3 mm lesions.

Comparison of the Utility of High-Resolution CT-DWI and T2WI-DWI Fusion Images for the Localization of Cholesteatoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cholesteatoma is an aggressive disease that may lead to hearing impairment. This study aimed to compare the utility of high-resolution CT and TSE-DWI fusion images with that of T2WI and TSE-DWI fusion images in the localization of middle ear cholesteatoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-one patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were retrospectively recruited. High-resolution CT, T2WI with fat suppression, and TSE-DWI scans were obtained, and image fusion was performed using a 3D reconstruction postprocessing workstation to form CT-DWI and T2WI-DWI fusion images. The quality of the 2 fused images was subjectively evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale with the horizontal semicircular canal transverse position as the reference. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and the diagnostic efficacies of CT-DWI and T2WI-DWI fusion images in localizing middle ear cholesteatoma were calculated.

RESULTS

The overall quality of T2WI-DWI fusion images was slightly higher than that of CT-DWI fusion images (P < .001), and the semicircular canal was slightly less clear on T2WI-DWI than on CT-DWI (P < .001). No statistical difference was found in the diagnostic confidence between them. In the localization of middle ear cholesteatoma, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of T2WI-DWI fusion images and CT-DWI fusion images were equivalent for involvement of the attic, tympanic cavity, mastoid antrum, and mastoid process, with no statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

T2WI-DWI fusion images could replace CT-DWI in the preoperative selection of surgical options for middle ear cholesteatoma.

Guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric head and neck pathologies: a multicentre international consensus paper

The use of standardized imaging protocols is paramount in order to facilitate comparable, reproducible images and, consequently, to optimize patient care. Standardized MR protocols are lacking when studying head and neck pathologies in the pediatric population. We propose an international, multicenter consensus paper focused on providing the best combination of acquisition time/technical requirements and image quality. Distinct protocols for different regions of the head and neck and, in some cases, for specific pathologies or clinical indications are recommended. This white paper is endorsed by several international scientific societies and it is the result of discussion, in consensus, among experts in pediatric head and neck imaging.

Detection of cholesteatoma: 2D BLADE turbo gradient- and spin-echo imaging versus readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging

PURPOSE

This study is to compare the accuracy of 2D BLADE turbo gradient- and spin-echo imaging (TGSE BLADE) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with that of readout-segmented echo-planar (RESOLVE) DWI in the detection of primary and residual/recurrent temporal bone cholesteatoma.

METHODS

The prospective study population consisted of 58 patients who were underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the evaluation of suspected temporal bone cholesteatoma. Two radiologists independently evaluated the two sequences. Kappa (k) statistics, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and a paired t test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients included, all had histo-pathologically confirmed cholesteatomas. In ≤ 3 mm group (n = 13), TGSE BLADE sequence correctly identified all cases except one that was recorded as equivocal on both sequences because of high signal intensity on T1WI; while on RESOLVE sequences, 6 were positive, 4 were equivocal, and 3 were false negative. For > 3 mm group (n = 45), detection performance was similar between the two sequences. The mean ADC of cholesteatoma on TGSE BLADE DWI was 0.923 × 10^-3 mm²/s, and the mean ADC of cholesteatoma on RESOLVE DWI was 0.949 × 10^-3 mm²/s, with no significant difference in the mean ADC values of cholesteatoma measured on the two sequences (p = 0.9216).

CONCLUSION

TGSE BLADE outperforms RESOLVE in the detection of small temporal bone cholesteatoma ≤ 3 mm.