Duct-like Recess in the Infundibular Portion of Third Ventricle Craniopharyngiomas: An MRI Sign Identifying the Papillary Type

Distinction of papillary and adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma: Clinical features, surgical nuances and hypothalamic outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Understanding the differences of suprasellar papillary and adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas (PCPs/ACPs) is pivotal for target therapy, surgical strategy or postoperative management. Here, the clinical features, surgical nuances and postoperative hypothalamic outcomes of PCPs were systematically recapitulated.

METHODS

24 PCPs and 52 ACPs underwent initial surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data, quantified third ventricle (3rd V) occupation and optic chiasm distortion were compared, as well as intra-operative findings, operating notes and prognosis. Moreover, analysis of tumor/3rd V relationship and hypothalamic outcomes were also performed.

RESULTS

Tumors were more likely to occupies the 3rd V cavity in PCPs. Chiasm distortion of "compressed forward" was the most common pattern (45.8 %) in PCPs, whereas "stretched forward" pattern accounted the highest (42.5 %) in ACPs. Besides, round-shaped with less calcification, duct-like recess, solid consistency, rare subdiaphragmatic invasion, visible lower stalk and improved postoperative visual outcome were more frequently observed in PCPs. The basal membranes of the tumor epithelium and the reactive gliosis were separated by a layer of collagen fibers in most PCPs, which differs from ACPs in the morphological examination of tumor/3rd V floor interface. In daytime sleepiness and memory difficulty, the PCPs showed significantly better outcomes than the ACPs groups, and PCPs suffered less postoperative weight gain (p < 0.05) than ACPs among adult-onset cases.

CONCLUSION

PCPs are different from ACPs regards the clinical features, operative techniques and outcomes. If necessary, PCPs are suggested more amenable to total removal since its less invasiveness to the 3rd V floor and better hypothalamic outcomes.

Topographical distribution and prevalence of basal duct-like recess sign in a cohort of Papillary Craniopharyngioma-novel findings and implications

PURPOSE

Basal duct-like recess (DR) sign serves as a specific marker of papillary craniopharyngiomas (PCPs) of the strictly third-ventricular (3 V) topography. Origins of this sign are poorly understood with limited validation in external cohorts.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, MRIs of pathologically proven PCPs were reviewed and evaluated for tumor topography, DR sign prevalence, and morphological subtypes.

RESULTS

Twenty-three cases with 24 MRIs satisfied our inclusion criteria. Median age was 44.5 years with a predominant male distribution (M/F ratio 4.7:1). Overall, strictly 3 V was the commonest tumor topography (8/24, 33.3%), and tumors were most commonly solid-cystic (10/24, 41.7%). The prevalence of DR sign was 21.7% (5/23 cases), all with strictly 3 V topography and with a predominantly solid consistency. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value of the DR sign for strict 3 V topography was 62.5%, 100%, 100% and 84.2% respectively. New pertinent findings associated with the DR sign were observed in our cohort. This included development of the cleft-like variant of DR sign after a 9-year follow-up initially absent at baseline imaging. Additionally, cystic dilatation of the basal tumor cleft at the pituitary stalk-tumor junction and presence of a vascular structure overlapping the DR sign were noted. Relevant mechanisms, hypotheses, and implications were explored.

CONCLUSION

We confirm the DR sign as a highly specific marker of the strictly 3 V topography in PCPs. While embryological and molecular factors remain pertinent in understanding origins of the DR sign, non-embryological mechanisms may play a role in development of the cleft-like variant.

Imaging of pituitary tumors: an update with the 5th WHO Classifications-part 2. Neoplasms other than PitNET and tumor-mimicking lesions

Many types of tumors can develop in the pituitary gland. In the recently revised 5th editions of the World Health Organization (WHO) classifications (2021 WHO Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors and the 2022 WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors), various changes have been made to the tumors other than pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET)/pituitary adenoma, as well as PitNET. Adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma and papillary craniopharyngioma are now considered separate tumors in the 5th edition of the WHO classification. Tumors positive for thyroid transcription factor 1, a marker of posterior pituitary cells, are now grouped together in the pituicyte tumor family in the 5th edition of the WHO classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors. Poorly differentiated chordoma is newly listed in the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors. In this paper, we present the latest WHO classification of pituitary tumors (adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma, papillary craniopharyngioma, pituitary blastoma, pituicyte tumor family, tumors of pituitary origin other than those of the pituicyte tumor family, germinoma, meningioma, chordoma, metastatic tumors, lymphoma, and pituitary incidentaloma), review diseases requiring differentiation from tumors (pituitary abscess, hypophysitis, pituitary hyperplasia, Rathke's cleft cyst, arachnoid cyst, and aneurysm), and discuss diagnoses based on imaging findings.