1
|
Sørensen TM, Scahill K, Ruperez JE, Olejnik M, Swinbourne F, Verwilghen DR, Nolff MC, Baines S, Marques C, Vilen A, Duarte EL, Dias M, Dewulf S, Wichtowska A, Valencia AC, Pelligand L, Broens EM, Toutain PL, Alishani M, Brennan ML, Weese JS, Jessen LR, Allerton F. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in companion animal surgery: A scoping review for European Network for Optimization of Antimicrobial Therapy (ENOVAT) guidelines. Vet J 2024; 304:106101. [PMID: 38490359 DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is widely used to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSI), but there is uncertainty as to what the proportion of SSI reduction is. Therefore, it is difficult for surgeons to properly weigh the costs, risks and benefits for individual patients when deciding on the use of SAP, making it challenging to promote antimicrobial stewardship in primary practice settings. The objective of this study was to map the veterinary evidence focused on assessing the effect of SAP on SSI development and in order to identify surgical procedures with some research evidence and possible knowledge gaps. In October 2021 and December 2022, Scopus, CAB Abstracts, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase and MEDLINE were systematically searched. Double blinded screening of records was performed to identify studies in companion animals that reported on the use of SAP and SSI rates. Comparative data were available from 34 out of 39123 records screened including: eight randomised controlled trials (RCT), 23 cohort studies (seven prospective and 16 retrospective) and three retrospective case series representing 12476 dogs and cats in total. Extracted data described peri- or post-operative SAP in nine, and 25 studies, respectively. In the eight RCTs evaluating SAP in companion animals, surgical procedure coverage was skewed towards orthopaedic stifle surgeries in referral settings and there was large variation in SAP protocols, SSI definitions and follow-up periods. More standardized data collection and agreement of SSI definitions is needed to build stronger evidence for optimized patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T M Sørensen
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlaegevej 16, Frederiksberg C 1870, Denmark; ESCMID Study Group for Veterinary Microbiology (ESGVM), Basel, Switzerland.
| | - K Scahill
- College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, United Kingdom; Evidensia Södra Djursjukhuset Kungens Kurva, Månskärarvägen 13, Kungens Kurva 14175, Sweden; ESCMID Study Group for Veterinary Microbiology (ESGVM), Basel, Switzerland
| | - J Espinel Ruperez
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Perth, WA 6150, Australia
| | - M Olejnik
- Department of Fundamental and Preclinical Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Jurija Gagarina 11, Toruń 87-100, Poland
| | - F Swinbourne
- Lumbry Park Veterinary Specialists, Selborne Rd, Alton GU34 3HL, United Kingdom
| | - D R Verwilghen
- Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Regimental Dr, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - M C Nolff
- Clinic for Small Animal Surgery, Vetsuisse Faculty, University Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, TFA 01.51, Zürich 8057, Switzerland
| | - S Baines
- Willows Veterinary Centre & Referral Service, Solihull B90 4NH, United Kingdom
| | - C Marques
- Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Campo Grande 376, Lisboa 1749-024, Portugal; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health (CIISA), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - A Vilen
- AniCura Landskrona Smådjursklinik, Föreningsgatan 165, Landskrona 261 51, Sweden
| | - E L Duarte
- Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Universidade de Évora, Pólo da Mitra Apartado 94, Évora 7006-554, Portugal; ESCMID Study Group for Veterinary Microbiology (ESGVM), Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Dias
- Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Universidade de Évora, Pólo da Mitra Apartado 94, Évora 7006-554, Portugal
| | - S Dewulf
- Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Gebouw D4, Salisburylaan 133, Merelbeke, Ghent 9820, Belgium
| | - A Wichtowska
- Department of Fundamental and Preclinical Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Jurija Gagarina 11, Toruń 87-100, Poland
| | - A Carranza Valencia
- Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, Bern University, Länggassstrasse 120, Bern 3012, Switzerland
| | - L Pelligand
- Dept. Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, 4 Royal College St, London NW1 0TU, United Kingdom; ESCMID Study Group for Veterinary Microbiology (ESGVM), Basel, Switzerland
| | - E M Broens
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 1, Utrecht 3584 CL, the Netherlands; ESCMID Study Group for Veterinary Microbiology (ESGVM), Basel, Switzerland
| | - P L Toutain
- Dept. Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, 4 Royal College St, London NW1 0TU, United Kingdom; INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 23 Chem. des Capelles Entrée n°1, Toulouse 31300, France
| | - M Alishani
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary, University of Prishtina "Hasan Prishtina", Prishtina 10 000, Kosovo
| | - M L Brennan
- Centre for Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Loughborough LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | - J S Weese
- Dept of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 419 Gordon St, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - L R Jessen
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlaegevej 16, Frederiksberg C 1870, Denmark; ESCMID Study Group for Veterinary Microbiology (ESGVM), Basel, Switzerland
| | - F Allerton
- Willows Veterinary Centre & Referral Service, Solihull B90 4NH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Labricciosa FM, Al Omari AH, Bains L, Baraket O, Catarci M, Cui Y, Ferreres AR, Gkiokas G, Gomes CA, Hodonou AM, Isik A, Litvin A, Lohsiriwat V, Kotecha V, Khokha V, Kryvoruchko IA, Machain GM, O’Connor DB, Olaoye I, Al-Omari JAK, Pasculli A, Petrone P, Rickard J, Sall I, Sawyer RG, Téllez-Almenares O, Catena F, Siquini W. Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis: A Proposal for a Global Evidence-Based Bundle. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:100. [PMID: 38275329 PMCID: PMC10812782 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13010100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
In the multimodal strategy context, to implement healthcare-associated infection prevention, bundles are one of the most commonly used methods to adapt guidelines in the local context and transfer best practices into routine clinical care. One of the most important measures to prevent surgical site infections is surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP). This narrative review aims to present a bundle for the correct SAP administration and evaluate the evidence supporting it. Surgical site infection (SSI) prevention guidelines published by the WHO, CDC, NICE, and SHEA/IDSA/APIC/AHA, and the clinical practice guidelines for SAP by ASHP/IDSA/SIS/SHEA, were reviewed. Subsequently, comprehensive searches were also conducted using the PubMed®/MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases, in order to identify further supporting evidence-based documentation. The bundle includes five different measures that may affect proper SAP administration. The measures included may be easily implemented in all hospitals worldwide and are based on minimal drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics knowledge, which all surgeons should know. Antibiotics for SAP should be prescribed for surgical procedures at high risk for SSIs, such as clean-contaminated and contaminated surgical procedures or for clean surgical procedures where SSIs, even if unlikely, may have devastating consequences, such as in procedures with prosthetic implants. SAP should generally be administered within 60 min before the surgical incision for most antibiotics (including cefazolin). SAP redosing is indicated for surgical procedures exceeding two antibiotic half-lives or for procedures significantly associated with blood loss. In principle, SAP should be discontinued after the surgical procedure. Hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship programmes can optimise the treatment of infections and reduce adverse events associated with antibiotics. In the context of a collaborative and interdisciplinary approach, it is essential to encourage an institutional safety culture in which surgeons are persuaded, rather than compelled, to respect antibiotic prescribing practices. In that context, the proposed bundle contains a set of evidence-based interventions for SAP administration. It is easy to apply, promotes collaboration, and includes measures that can be adequately followed and evaluated in all hospitals worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Sartelli
- Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, 62100 Macerata, Italy;
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, Pisa University Hospital, 56124 Pisa, Italy;
| | | | - AbdelKarim. H. Al Omari
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan;
| | - Lovenish Bains
- Department of General Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi 110002, India;
| | - Oussama Baraket
- Department of General Surgery, Bizerte Hospital, Bizerte 7000, Tunisia;
| | - Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, 00157 Rome, Italy;
| | - Yunfeng Cui
- Department of Surgery, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Nankai Clinical School of Medicine, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China;
| | - Alberto R. Ferreres
- Department of Surgery, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires 1428, Argentina;
| | - George Gkiokas
- Department of Surgery, Medical School, “Aretaieio” Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece;
| | - Carlos Augusto Gomes
- Department of Surgery, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde de Juiz de Fora, Hospital Universitário Terezinha de Jesus, Juiz de Fora 25520, Brazil;
| | - Adrien M. Hodonou
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Parakou, Parakou 03 BP 10, Benin;
| | - Arda Isik
- Department of Surgery, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul 34000, Turkey;
| | - Andrey Litvin
- Department of Surgical Diseases No. 3, Gomel State Medical University, 246000 Gomel, Belarus;
| | - Varut Lohsiriwat
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand;
| | - Vihar Kotecha
- Department of General Surgery, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza P.O. Box 1464, Tanzania;
| | - Vladimir Khokha
- General Surgery Unit, Podhalanski Specialized Hospital, 34-400 Nowy Targ, Poland;
| | - Igor A. Kryvoruchko
- Department of Surgery No. 2, Kharkiv National Medical University, 61000 Kharkiv, Ukraine;
| | - Gustavo M. Machain
- Department of Surgery, Universidad Nacional de Asuncion, San Lorenzo 1055, Paraguay;
| | - Donal B. O’Connor
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Trinity College, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland;
| | - Iyiade Olaoye
- Department of Surgery, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin 240101, Nigeria;
| | - Jamal A. K. Al-Omari
- Medical College, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Hussein Hospital, Zarqa 13313, Jordan;
| | - Alessandro Pasculli
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), Unit of Academic General Surgery “V. Bonomo”, University of Bari “A. Moro”, 70125 Bari, Italy;
| | - Patrizio Petrone
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, NYU Langone Hospital—Long Island, Mineola, NY 11501, USA;
| | - Jennifer Rickard
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA;
| | - Ibrahima Sall
- Department of General Surgery, Military Teaching Hospital, Dakar 3006, Senegal;
| | - Robert G. Sawyer
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA;
| | - Orlando Téllez-Almenares
- General Surgery Department of Saturnino Lora Provincial Hospital, University of Medical Sciences of Santiago de Cuba,
26P2+J7X, Santiago de Cuba 90100, Cuba;
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Surgery, “Bufalini” Hospital, 47521 Cesena, Italy;
| | - Walter Siquini
- Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, 62100 Macerata, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gillani SW, Vippadapu P, Gulam SM. Physician-reported barriers and challenges to antibiotic prescribing in surgical prophylaxis: a structured systematic review. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/jphsr/rmab022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The purpose of the study is to identify and analyse the barriers in surgical procedures where antibiotic dissipation is habitual.
Methods
Extensive literature search is carried out using different electronic databases (PubMed, Europe PMC, PLoS and Google Scholar) between January 2000 and December 2020. The articles were selected purely based on the inclusion criteria. Only qualitative and cross-sectional studies were selected to reduce the risk of bias. The JBI and AXIS checklists were used to assessed the quality of the enrolled articles. Data extractions were done by using a predesigned standardized data collection form.
Key findings
A total of 2067 articles were electronically retrieved but only 14 articles met the eligibility criteria. About 15 902 healthcare professionals (HCPs) with an average response rate of 64.7% were pooled for evidence synthesis. The majority of respondents (50%) discussed different barriers in their practice site for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) administration. Barriers were categorized into four themes: lack of guideline availability and knowledge, lack of adherence to guidelines, lack of guideline knowledge and adherence and physician perceptions or off-label practices. A total of 723 (56.3%) out of 1282 HCPs from nine different studies reported a lack of adherence to guidelines during the perioperative process. The majority of respondents in three studies, 318 (82%) out of 386 HCPs, reported that physicians’ perceptions play a crucial role in prescribing SAP during surgeries.
Conclusion
This study concluded that the barriers within the practice site play a decisive role in SAP optimization and therefore all HCPs are recommended to maintain local/standard guidelines and adhere to them while prescribing SAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Wasif Gillani
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, UAE
| | - Prasanna Vippadapu
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, UAE
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
The treatment of patients with chronic wounds is a multiprofessional challenge. Based on a comprehensive diagnosis and integrated into a causal treatment concept, patients should always be treated with a modern wound therapy. This wound therapy should try to take into account many different factors such as the wound healing phases, infection status, exudate levels, but also individual patient wishes. Especially in the case of chronic wounds of the lower extremities and edema, compression therapy is also very important for therapy and recurrence prophylaxis. In addition, the pain, which is usually very distressing, should be recorded and adequately treated or avoided. Modern moist wound therapy can then support the healing of patients with chronic wounds, reduce complications and thus improve their quality of life.
Collapse
|
5
|
Rohrer F, Maurer A, Noetzli H, Gahl B, Limacher A, Hermann T, Bruegger J. Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis use in elective orthopaedic surgery - a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:420. [PMID: 33957917 PMCID: PMC8101240 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04290-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) prevents surgical site infections (SSI). In orthopaedic surgery, the use of prolonged SAP (PSAP) has been reported in daily routine, despite guidelines advising against it. Therefore, we asked: What is the proportion of PSAP use, defined as administration of SAP ≥24 h after elective orthopaedic surgery? Are there patient- and surgery-related predictors of PSAP use? Methods This cross-sectional analysis investigated 1292 patients who underwent elective orthopaedic surgery including total joint arthroplasties at one Swiss centre between 2015 and 2017. Patient comorbidities, surgical characteristics and occurrence of SSI at 90 days in PSAP group were compared to the SAP group (< 24 h post-operative). Results PSAP use was 12% (155 of 1292). Patient-related factors associated with PSAP compared to the SAP group included older age (63 vs. 58y; p < 0.001), higher BMI (29 vs. 27 kg/m2; p < 0.001), ASA classification ≥3 (31% vs. 17%; p < 0.001) and lung disease (17% vs. 9%; p = 0.002). Surgery-related factors associated with PSAP were use of prosthetics (62% vs. 45%; p < 0.001), surgery of the knee (65% vs. 25%; p < 0.001), longer surgery duration (87 vs. 68 min; p < 0.001) and presence of drains (90% vs. 65%; p < 0.001). All four SSI occurred in the SAP group (0 vs. 4; p = 1.0). Surgeons administered PSAP with varying frequencies; proportions ranged from 0 to 33%. Conclusion PSAP use and SSI proportions were lower than reported in the literature. Several patient- and surgery-related factors associated with PSAP use were identified and some were potentially modifiable. Also, experienced surgeons seemed to implement differing approaches regarding the duration of SAP administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Rohrer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sonnenhofspital, 3006, Bern, Switzerland. .,Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, CHUV, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Anita Maurer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sonnenhofspital, 3006, Bern, Switzerland.,University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hubert Noetzli
- University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.,Orthopaedie Sonnenhof, 3006, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Brigitta Gahl
- Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) Bern, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Limacher
- Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) Bern, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tanja Hermann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sonnenhofspital, 3006, Bern, Switzerland.,Stiftung Lindenhof, Campus SLB, Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jan Bruegger
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sonnenhofspital, 3006, Bern, Switzerland.,University of Zurich, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|