1
|
Barth G, Prosch H, Blaivas M, Gschmack AM, Hari R, Hoffmann B, Jenssen C, Möller K, Neubauer R, Nourkami-Tutdibi N, Recker F, Ruppert JP, Von Wangenheim F, Weimer J, Westerway SC, Zervides C, Dietrich CF. Student Ultrasound Education, Current Views and Controversies; Who Should be Teaching? ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:1718-1723. [PMID: 39074814 DOI: 10.1055/a-2356-7906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
Acquiring diagnostic ultrasound competencies and skills is crucial in modern health care, and achieving the practical experience is vital in developing the necessary anatomy interpretation and scan acquisition skills. However, traditional teaching methods may not be sufficient to provide hands-on practice, which is essential for this skill acquisition. This paper explores various modalities and instructors involved in ultrasound education to identify the most effective approaches. The field of ultrasound instruction is enriched by the diverse roles of physicians, anatomists, peer tutors, and sonographers. All these healthcare professionals can inspire and empower the next generation of ultrasound practitioners with continuous training and support. Physicians bring their clinical expertise to the table, while anatomists enhance the understanding of anatomical knowledge through ultrasound integration. Peer tutors, often medical students, provide a layer of social congruence and motivation to the learning process. Sonographers provide intensive practical experience and structured learning plans to students. By combining different instructors and teaching methods, success can be achieved in ultrasound education. An ultrasound curriculum organized by experts in the field can lead to more efficient use of resources and better learning outcomes. Empowering students through peer-assisted learning can also ease the burden on faculty. Every instructor must receive comprehensive didactic training to ensure high-quality education in diagnostic ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregor Barth
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Brandenburg an der Havel University Hospital, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany
- Brandenburg Institute for Clinical Ultrasound (BICUS), Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Helmut Prosch
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Michael Blaivas
- Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, United States
| | | | - Roman Hari
- Dean's office, Medical Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Beatrice Hoffmann
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | - Christian Jenssen
- Department for Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland GmbH, Strausberg, Germany
- Department for Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland GmbH, Wriezen, Germany
- Brandenburg Institute for Clinical Ultrasound (BICUS), Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Kathleen Möller
- Medical Department I/Gastroenterology, Sana Hospital Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Nasenien Nourkami-Tutdibi
- Department of General Pediatrics and Neonatology, Saarland University Hospital and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg, Germany
| | - Florian Recker
- Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | - Johannes Weimer
- Rudolf Frey Teaching Department, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | - Christoph F Dietrich
- Allgemeine Innere Medizin (DAIM) Kliniken Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Slyvka Y, Gwilym JL. Teaching ultrasound in osteopathic medical schools. J Osteopath Med 2024; 124:107-113. [PMID: 38053432 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2023-0027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT An important diagnostic tool, ultrasound (US) has been incorporated into the curriculum of medical schools for more than 20 years. In the last decade, the interest in US educational research has experienced exponential growth but mostly from Medical Doctor (MD)-granted schools. The extent to which US is embedded in the curricula of the colleges of osteopathic medicine (COM) still requires a comprehensive evaluation. OBJECTIVES This survey is designed to evaluate the current status of US teaching in COMs with an emphasis on the inclusion of the US in osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) training. METHODS An anonymous, voluntary, 22-question online survey was created and administered to all COMs to collect data about the current state of US teaching. A descriptive analysis was performed to describe and summarize the final data. Fisher's exact test was utilized for the comparison of study variables. RESULTS We received responses from 36 of the 43 (83.7 %) COMs invited to participate in the survey, all of which had US training within their curriculum, most commonly integrated into the year 1 curriculum (86.1 %). Focused US training is incorporated into 83.3 % of these schools (30 of 36). Focused US training is covered in 83.3 % of schools (30 of 36). US is mostly taught in the anatomy course (38.8 %). US is incorporated in the OMM course in 12 of 36 schools (33.3 %). The majority of respondents feel that US training will make osteopathic students more competitive in the job market (88.9 %) and want more US in their curriculum (86.1 %). The idea that US is useful for a better understanding of the key OMM concepts is believed by 62.9 % of respondents. The major obstacle to the implementation of US in the curriculum is having appropriately trained faculty (86.1 %). The majority of the respondents did not feel that an adequate budget is a handicap to implementing US in the curriculum. CONCLUSIONS US is included within the curriculum of all respondents to our survey, a third of whom included US within their OMM curriculum. US is treated as a useful and important skill for future osteopathic physicians. The majority of COMs desire more US training in the curriculum. The main barrier to implementing US in the curriculum is the lack of appropriately trained faculty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuriy Slyvka
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH, USA
| | - Jennifer L Gwilym
- Department of Primary Care, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dupriez F, Hall A, Diop T, Collard A, de Castro BR, Smets F, Penaloza A, Vanpee D. Point-of-Care Ultrasound training in undergraduate education in the European Union: current situation and perspectives. Ultrasound J 2024; 16:9. [PMID: 38349580 PMCID: PMC10864236 DOI: 10.1186/s13089-024-00361-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the widespread use of Point-of-Care UltraSound (PoCUS) in clinical practice, with ultrasound machines becoming more portable and affordable, recommendations and position statements from ultrasound societies now promote teaching PoCUS in the undergraduate curriculum. Nevertheless, surveys about PoCUS teaching in European medical schools are lacking. This survey aims to overview the current and future undergraduate PoCUS courses in the European Union (EU). RESULTS A questionnaire was sent to medical schools in 26 of the 27 countries of the EU; Luxembourg is the only country without a medical school. The survey was completed by the dean or a member of the medical school with knowledge of the medical curriculum. Of the 58 medical schools from 19 countries that responded to the survey, 18 (31.0%) from 13 (68.4%) EU countries reported the existence of an undergraduate PoCUS curriculum and a further 16 (27.6%) from 12 (41.4%) EU countries intended to offer it in the future. No significant difference was observed between the current and future PoCUS curricula regarding its content and purpose. Less than 40 h of theoretical teaching is provided in all the medical schools and less than 40 h of practical training is provided in 12 (75%) of the 16 medical schools which answered this specific question. Of the 40 (69%) surveyed medical schools that do not currently teach PoCUS, 20 (50%) intend to offer PoCUS courses in the future. CONCLUSION Although the lack of teaching hours in curricula suggests that most PoCUS courses are introductory in nature and that medical students are possibly not trained to become autonomous in clinical practice, evaluating the feasibility and impact of PoCUS teaching on clinical practice should be promoted. The medical schools that intend to develop this curriculum should be encouraged to implement validated tools to objectively assess their programs and students' performances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Dupriez
- Emergency Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Audrey Hall
- Emergency Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Toumane Diop
- Emergency Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alix Collard
- Statistical Support Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Françoise Smets
- Faculty of Medicine and Dental Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrea Penaloza
- Faculty of Medicine and Dental Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dominique Vanpee
- Institute of Health and Society and CHU UCL Namur, UCLOUVAIN, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bintaro S, Dietrich CF, Potthoff A. Principles for teaching sonography - current status. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2023; 61:1628-1634. [PMID: 37142236 DOI: 10.1055/a-2059-4425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Since many young medical residents require sonographic skills early on during training, increased attention has been paid to including sonography classes in undergraduate medical education, among both professional societies and medical educators responsible for medical licensing exams. Medical schools worldwide have developed and implemented a variety of ultrasound teaching formats.This article addresses evidence-based solutions to crucial challenges in planning and implementing undergraduate sonography education. In order to achieve a sustainable increase in practical sonographic competence, we suggest small-group classes with sufficient individual hands-on scanning time for each student. We recommend concentrating on a circumscribed topic and teaching it thoroughly and practically rather than superficially outlining a broad subject area. Provided that peer teachers undergo adequate training, student peer teachers are not inferior to physicians as teachers, as far as student satisfaction, theoretical knowledge and practical skills acquisition are concerned. The assessment of acquired practical skills should consist of practical examinations, such as an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) or a direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS). In contrast to using healthy volunteers as training models, simulation trainers allow the demonstration of pathological findings in authentic sonographic images, with the disadvantages of unrealistically easy image acquisition, as well as the lack of interaction with the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Bintaro
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christoph F Dietrich
- Allgemeine Innere Medizin (DAIM) Kliniken Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrej Potthoff
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Weimer J, Dionysopoulou A, Strelow KU, Buggenhagen H, Weinmann-Menke J, Dirks K, Weimer A, Künzel J, Börner N, Ludwig M, Yang Y, Lorenz L, Ille C, Müller L. Undergraduate ultrasound training: prospective comparison of two different peer assisted course models on national standards. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2023; 23:513. [PMID: 37461025 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04511-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A thorough knowledge of sonography is essential in clinical practice. Therefore, sonography training is increasingly incorporated into the medical school curriculum, entailing different course models. The question arises which model is most effective to convey sustained sonographic skills. METHODS Two different peer-assisted learning (PAL) sonography course models were developed as part of a clinical prospective study. The course content was based on the national resident curriculum of the German Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM). Model A consists of a 10-week course and model B of a two-day compact course. Each model entailed 20 teaching units (TU). A script was used to prepare for each unit. Two modified OSCE exams of the ultrasound skills (max = 50 points per exam) were performed during the last teaching unit to assess the competence level. For subjective self-assessment and model evaluation, a questionnaire with a 7-point Likert scale was employed. RESULTS A total of 888 students of the 3rd year participated as part of a voluntary elective in the study (744 in model A and 144 in model B). In the exams, participants in model A (median 43 points) scored significantly higher than those in model B (median 39; p < 0.01). Participants in model A (mean 1.71 points) obtained significantly higher mean competency gain scores in subject knowledge than model B (mean 1.43 points; p < 0.01) participants. All participants were satisfied with the course concept (A: mean 1.68 vs. B: mean 1.78 points; p = 0.05), the teaching materials (A: mean 1.81 vs. B: mean 1.69 points; p = 0.52), and the tutor's didactic skills (A: mean 1.24 vs. B: mean 1.15 points; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION These results suggest that sonography-specific competency may be obtained through different course models, with a model stretching over several weeks leading to a higher competence level. Further research should assess the long-term retention of the skills obtained in different models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Weimer
- Rudolf Frey Learning Clinic, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Anna Dionysopoulou
- Department of obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kai-Uwe Strelow
- Rudolf Frey Learning Clinic, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Holger Buggenhagen
- Rudolf Frey Learning Clinic, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Julia Weinmann-Menke
- Department of Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Klaus Dirks
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Rems-Murr-Klinikum, Winnenden, Germany
| | - Andreas Weimer
- Center of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery, and Spinal Cord Injury, Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julian Künzel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Norbert Börner
- Gastroenterological Medical Group Offices, MED Specialist Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Ludwig
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Hospital of the German Armed Forces Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Liv Lorenz
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Carlotta Ille
- Rudolf Frey Learning Clinic, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Lukas Müller
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Höhne E, Recker F, Schmok E, Brossart P, Raupach T, Schäfer VS. Conception and Feasibility of a Digital Tele-Guided Abdomen, Thorax, and Thyroid Gland Ultrasound Course for Medical Students (TELUS study). ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN (STUTTGART, GERMANY : 1980) 2023; 44:194-202. [PMID: 34225375 DOI: 10.1055/a-1528-1418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Medical education has been transformed during the COVID-19 pandemic, creating challenges regarding adequate training in ultrasound (US). Due to the discontinuation of traditional classroom teaching, the need to expand digital learning opportunities is undeniable. The aim of our study is to develop a tele-guided US course for undergraduate medical students and test the feasibility and efficacy of this digital US teaching method. MATERIALS AND METHODS A tele-guided US course was established for medical students. Students underwent seven US organ modules. Each module took place in a flipped classroom concept via the Amboss platform, providing supplementary e-learning material that was optional and included information on each of the US modules. An objective structured assessment of US skills (OSAUS) was implemented as the final exam. US images of the course and exam were rated by the Brightness Mode Quality Ultrasound Imaging Examination Technique (B-QUIET). Achieved points in image rating were compared to the OSAUS exam. RESULTS A total of 15 medical students were enrolled. Students achieved an average score of 154.5 (SD ± 11.72) out of 175 points (88.29 %) in OSAUS, which corresponded to the image rating using B-QUIET. Interrater analysis of US images showed a favorable agreement with an ICC (2.1) of 0.895 (95 % confidence interval 0.858 < ICC < 0.924). CONCLUSION US training via teleguidance should be considered in medical education. Our pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of a concept that can be used in the future to improve US training of medical students even during a pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Höhne
- Clinic of Internal Medicine III, Oncology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Bonn, Germany
| | - Florian Recker
- Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Peter Brossart
- Clinic of Internal Medicine III, Oncology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Bonn, Germany
| | - Tobias Raupach
- Institute for Medical Education, University Hospital Bonn, Germany
| | - Valentin Sebastian Schäfer
- Clinic of Internal Medicine III, Oncology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Weimer J, Rolef P, Müller L, Bellhäuser H, Göbel S, Buggenhagen H, Weimer A, Waezsada E, Kirchhoff F, Weinmann-Menke J. FoCUS cardiac ultrasound training for undergraduates based on current national guidelines: a prospective, controlled, single-center study on transferability. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2023; 23:80. [PMID: 36726093 PMCID: PMC9893662 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04062-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In emergency and critical-care medicine, focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) is indispensable for assessing a patient's cardiac status. The aim of this study was to establish and validate a peer-to-peer-supported ultrasound course for learning FoCUS-specific skills during undergraduate studies at a German university. METHODS A 1-day, 12 teaching units training course was developed for students in the clinical section of medical college, with content based on the current national guidelines. A total of 217 students participated in the study (97 in the course group and 120 in the control group). The course and the participants' subjective assessment of improved skills were evaluated using a questionnaire (7-point Likert scale; 7 = complete agreement and 1 = no agreement at all). Objective learning gains were assessed by tests before and after the course. These consisted of a test of figural intelligence (eight items) and a test of technical knowledge (13 items). RESULTS The course participants experienced significant improvement (P < 0.001) from before to after the course, with a large effect size of η2part = 0.26. In addition, the course group had significantly better results (P < 0.001) than the control group in the post-test, with a medium to large effect size of η2part = 0.14. No significant differences (P = 0.27) were detected in the test section on figural intelligence. The evaluations showed that the participants had a high degree of satisfaction with the course approach, teaching materials, and tutors. There was also a positive increase in their subjective assessment of their own skills, including areas such as technical knowledge, ultrasound anatomy, and performance of the examination. CONCLUSION The results of both the objective learning assessment and the subjective evaluations suggest that a FoCUS course originally intended for qualified physicians is equally suitable for students. With the development and provision of modern digital teaching media, even more students will be able to benefit from this approach in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Weimer
- Rudolf-Frey Lernklinik, Department of Medicine, University of Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Peter Rolef
- Rudolf-Frey Lernklinik, Department of Medicine, University of Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Lukas Müller
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Henrik Bellhäuser
- Institute of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Göbel
- Department of Medicine II, Cardiology Center, Department of Medicine, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Holger Buggenhagen
- Rudolf-Frey Lernklinik, Department of Medicine, University of Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Weimer
- Center for Orthopedics, Emergency Surgery, and Paraplegics, Department of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elias Waezsada
- Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Hospital, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Friederike Kirchhoff
- Rudolf-Frey Lernklinik, Department of Medicine, University of Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Julia Weinmann-Menke
- Department of Medicine I, Nephrology Center, Department of Medicine, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hoppmann RA, Mladenovic J, Melniker L, Badea R, Blaivas M, Montorfano M, Abuhamad A, Noble V, Hussain A, Prosen G, Villen T, Via G, Nogue R, Goodmurphy C, Bastos M, Nace GS, Volpicelli G, Wakefield RJ, Wilson S, Bhagra A, Kim J, Bahner D, Fox C, Riley R, Steinmetz P, Nelson BP, Pellerito J, Nazarian LN, Wilson LB, Ma IWY, Amponsah D, Barron KR, Dversdal RK, Wagner M, Dean AJ, Tierney D, Tsung JW, Nocera P, Pazeli J, Liu R, Price S, Neri L, Piccirillo B, Osman A, Lee V, Naqvi N, Petrovic T, Bornemann P, Valois M, Lanctot JF, Haddad R, Govil D, Hurtado LA, Dinh VA, DePhilip RM, Hoffmann B, Lewiss RE, Parange NA, Nishisaki A, Doniger SJ, Dallas P, Bergman K, Barahona JO, Wortsman X, Smith RS, Sisson CA, Palma J, Mallin M, Ahmed L, Mustafa H. International consensus conference recommendations on ultrasound education for undergraduate medical students. Ultrasound J 2022; 14:31. [PMID: 35895165 PMCID: PMC9329507 DOI: 10.1186/s13089-022-00279-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to provide expert consensus recommendations to establish a global ultrasound curriculum for undergraduate medical students. METHODS 64 multi-disciplinary ultrasound experts from 16 countries, 50 multi-disciplinary ultrasound consultants, and 21 medical students and residents contributed to these recommendations. A modified Delphi consensus method was used that included a systematic literature search, evaluation of the quality of literature by the GRADE system, and the RAND appropriateness method for panel judgment and consensus decisions. The process included four in-person international discussion sessions and two rounds of online voting. RESULTS A total of 332 consensus conference statements in four curricular domains were considered: (1) curricular scope (4 statements), (2) curricular rationale (10 statements), (3) curricular characteristics (14 statements), and (4) curricular content (304 statements). Of these 332 statements, 145 were recommended, 126 were strongly recommended, and 61 were not recommended. Important aspects of an undergraduate ultrasound curriculum identified include curricular integration across the basic and clinical sciences and a competency and entrustable professional activity-based model. The curriculum should form the foundation of a life-long continuum of ultrasound education that prepares students for advanced training and patient care. In addition, the curriculum should complement and support the medical school curriculum as a whole with enhanced understanding of anatomy, physiology, pathophysiological processes and clinical practice without displacing other important undergraduate learning. The content of the curriculum should be appropriate for the medical student level of training, evidence and expert opinion based, and include ongoing collaborative research and development to ensure optimum educational value and patient care. CONCLUSIONS The international consensus conference has provided the first comprehensive document of recommendations for a basic ultrasound curriculum. The document reflects the opinion of a diverse and representative group of international expert ultrasound practitioners, educators, and learners. These recommendations can standardize undergraduate medical student ultrasound education while serving as a basis for additional research in medical education and the application of ultrasound in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A. Hoppmann
- grid.254567.70000 0000 9075 106XInternal Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, 6311 Garners Ferry Road, Bldg 3, Room 306, Columbia, SC 29209 USA
| | - Jeanette Mladenovic
- grid.414996.70000 0004 5902 8841Foundation for the Advancement of International Medical Education and Research, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Lawrence Melniker
- grid.413734.60000 0000 8499 1112Quality Emergency Department, NewYork-Presbyterian Health System, New York, USA
| | - Radu Badea
- grid.411040.00000 0004 0571 5814Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Michael Blaivas
- grid.254567.70000 0000 9075 106XInternal Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, USA
| | - Miguel Montorfano
- grid.414463.00000 0004 0638 1756Ultrasound and Doppler Department, Hospital de Emergencias “Dr. Clemente Alvarez”, Rosario, Argentina
| | - Alfred Abuhamad
- grid.255414.30000 0001 2182 3733Eastern Virginia School of Medicine, Norfolk, USA
| | - Vicki Noble
- grid.443867.a0000 0000 9149 4843Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA
| | - Arif Hussain
- grid.415254.30000 0004 1790 7311Cardiac Critical Care, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Gregor Prosen
- grid.412415.70000 0001 0685 1285Emergency Medicine, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Tomás Villen
- grid.449795.20000 0001 2193 453XFrancisco de Vitoria University School of Medicine, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gabriele Via
- grid.469433.f0000 0004 0514 7845Department of Cardiac Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Ramon Nogue
- grid.15043.330000 0001 2163 1432Emergency Medicine, University of Lleida School of Medicine, Lleida, Spain
| | - Craig Goodmurphy
- grid.240473.60000 0004 0543 9901Ultrasound Education, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA
| | - Marcus Bastos
- Ultrasound Point of Care, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde de Juiz de Fora - SUPREMA, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
| | - G. Stephen Nace
- grid.267301.10000 0004 0386 9246Medical Education and Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA
| | - Giovanni Volpicelli
- grid.415081.90000 0004 0493 6869Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Richard J. Wakefield
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Rheumatology, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Steve Wilson
- grid.254567.70000 0000 9075 106XUniversity of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, USA
| | - Anjali Bhagra
- grid.66875.3a0000 0004 0459 167XInternal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Jongyeol Kim
- grid.416992.10000 0001 2179 3554Neurology, School of Medicine Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA
| | - David Bahner
- grid.261331.40000 0001 2285 7943Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
| | - Chris Fox
- grid.266093.80000 0001 0668 7243Department Emergency Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA
| | - Ruth Riley
- grid.254567.70000 0000 9075 106XLibrary Services, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, USA
| | - Peter Steinmetz
- grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Bret P. Nelson
- grid.59734.3c0000 0001 0670 2351Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - John Pellerito
- grid.512756.20000 0004 0370 4759Radiology and Science Education, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Manhasset, USA
| | - Levon N. Nazarian
- grid.265008.90000 0001 2166 5843Radiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - L. Britt Wilson
- grid.254567.70000 0000 9075 106XPhysiology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, USA
| | - Irene W. Y. Ma
- grid.22072.350000 0004 1936 7697Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - David Amponsah
- grid.413103.40000 0001 2160 8953Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, USA
| | - Keith R. Barron
- grid.254567.70000 0000 9075 106XDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, USA
| | - Renee K. Dversdal
- grid.5288.70000 0000 9758 5690Internal Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | - Mike Wagner
- grid.254567.70000 0000 9075 106XMedicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine-Greenville, Greenville, USA
| | - Anthony J. Dean
- grid.25879.310000 0004 1936 8972Emeritus Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | - David Tierney
- grid.413195.b0000 0000 8795 611XInternal Medicine, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, USA
| | - James W. Tsung
- grid.59734.3c0000 0001 0670 2351Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Paula Nocera
- grid.413471.40000 0000 9080 8521Anesthesiologist, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - José Pazeli
- Nephology and Critical Care, Barbacena’s School of Medicine, Barbacena, Brazil
| | - Rachel Liu
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Susanna Price
- grid.439338.60000 0001 1114 4366Cardiology and Intensive Care, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, England
| | - Luca Neri
- grid.415280.a0000 0004 0402 3867Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam, Ad Dammām, Saudi Arabia
| | - Barbara Piccirillo
- grid.260914.80000 0001 2322 1832New York Institute of Technology, Bellmore, USA
| | - Adi Osman
- Emergency Physician & ED Critical Care, Trauma & Emergency Department, Hospital Raja Permaisuri, Ipoh, Perak Malaysia
| | - Vaughan Lee
- grid.267153.40000 0000 9552 1255Medical Education, University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, USA
| | - Nitha Naqvi
- grid.420545.20000 0004 0489 3985Royal Brompton Hospital Part of Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, England
| | | | - Paul Bornemann
- grid.254567.70000 0000 9075 106XDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, USA
| | - Maxime Valois
- Medicine, McGill and Sherbrooke Universities, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Robert Haddad
- grid.254567.70000 0000 9075 106XUltrasound Education - Ultrasound Institute, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, USA
| | - Deepak Govil
- grid.429252.a0000 0004 1764 4857Critical Care Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, India
| | - Laura A. Hurtado
- grid.7345.50000 0001 0056 1981Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Vi Am Dinh
- grid.411390.e0000 0000 9340 4063Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, USA
| | - Robert M. DePhilip
- grid.261331.40000 0001 2285 7943Emeritus Biomedical Education and Anatomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
| | - Beatrice Hoffmann
- grid.38142.3c000000041936754XDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Resa E. Lewiss
- grid.265008.90000 0001 2166 5843Emergency Medicine and Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Nayana A. Parange
- grid.1026.50000 0000 8994 5086Medical Sonography, University of South Australia Allied Health and Human Performance, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Akira Nishisaki
- grid.25879.310000 0004 1936 8972Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Stephanie J. Doniger
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children’s Hospital in Orange California, Orange, USA
| | - Paul Dallas
- grid.438526.e0000 0001 0694 4940Internal Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, USA
| | - Kevin Bergman
- grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811Family and Community Medicine, University of California - San Francisco, Martinez, USA
| | - J. Oscar Barahona
- grid.423309.f0000 0000 8901 8514Greenwich Ultrasound Services, Greenwich Ultrasound Associates, PC, Greenwich, USA
| | - Ximena Wortsman
- grid.443909.30000 0004 0385 4466Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - R. Stephen Smith
- grid.15276.370000 0004 1936 8091Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA
| | - Craig A. Sisson
- grid.267309.90000 0001 0629 5880Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA
| | - James Palma
- grid.265436.00000 0001 0421 5525Military and Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA
| | | | - Liju Ahmed
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Madinah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Hassan Mustafa
- grid.21613.370000 0004 1936 9609Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Camilo GB, Abu-Zidan F, Koratala A. Editorial: Experiences and advances in endocrinology point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:1094024. [PMID: 36755579 PMCID: PMC9901292 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1094024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Bittenourt Camilo
- Department of Anatomy, Juiz de Fora Federal University, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
- *Correspondence: Gustavo Bittenourt Camilo,
| | - Fikri Abu-Zidan
- The Research Office, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, AlAin, United Arab Emirates
| | - Abhilash Koratala
- College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ultrasonography in undergraduate medical education: a comprehensive review and the education program implemented at Jichi Medical University. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2022; 49:217-230. [PMID: 35034230 PMCID: PMC8761092 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-021-01178-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
The concept of point-of-care ultrasound has been widely accepted owing to the development of portable ultrasound systems and growing body of evidence concerning its extensive utility. Thus, it is reasonable to suggest that training to use this modality be included in undergraduate medical education. Training in ultrasonography helps medical students learn basic subjects such as anatomy and physiology, improve their physical examination skills, and acquire diagnostic and procedural skills. Technological advances such as simulators, affordable handheld devices, and tele-ultrasound systems can facilitate undergraduate ultrasound education. Several reports have indicated that some medical schools have integrated ultrasound training into their undergraduate medical curricula. Jichi Medical University in Japan has been providing medical students with ultrasound education to fulfill part of its mission to provide medical care to rural areas. Vertical integration of ultrasound education into a curriculum seems reasonable to ensure skill retention and improvement. However, several issues have hampered the integration of ultrasound into medical education, including a lack of trained faculty, the need to recruit human models, requisition of ultrasound machines for training, and limited curricular space; proposed solutions include peer teaching, students as trained simulated patients, the development of more affordable handheld devices, and a flipped classroom approach with access to an e-learning platform, respectively. A curriculum should be developed through multidisciplinary and bottom-up student-initiated approaches. Formulating national and international consensuses concerning the milestones and curricula can promote the incorporation of ultrasound training into undergraduate medical education at the national level.
Collapse
|
11
|
Recker F, Barth G, Lo H, Haverkamp N, Nürnberg D, Kravchenko D, Raupach T, Schäfer VS. Students' Perspectives on Curricular Ultrasound Education at German Medical Schools. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:758255. [PMID: 34901071 PMCID: PMC8655332 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.758255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Despite ultrasound being an inherent part of medical education, only a few German medical schools have established a comprehensive ultrasound curriculum. This study aimed to explore medical students' perspectives on ultrasound in medical education (USMed). Results: Between January 1st, 2019 und June 30th, 2019, an online survey was conducted among German medical students via the students' associations and their respective teaching facilities. The survey consisted of 17 items regarding USMed. Statements were rated on a 4-point Likert scale for agreement. In total, 1040 students from 31 German medical faculties participated. The majority (1021, 98.2%) reported a very high to high interest in curricular USMed. Students agreed (n = 945, 90.9%) that USMed would be helpful along their entire course of medical studies. Considering the best starting time for USMed, the opinions of German medical students diverged: students studying in a model curriculum preferred to start in the second year (40.7%) while 49% of the students studying in a traditional curriculum preferred to start in the third year (p ≤ 0.001). An insufficient allotment of time for USMed in the planned curriculum (675, 65%) and a lack of courses run by medical faculty (305, 29.4%) were listed as perceived significant barriers to the participation in USMed. Peer teaching was regarded as an effective method in realizing USMed by 731 (70.3%) students. Conclusion: German medical students are very interested and willing to participate in USMed. There appears to be a high demand for US courses offered by medical schools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Recker
- Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gregor Barth
- Brandenburg Institute for Clinical Ultrasound (BICUS), Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Hendra Lo
- Brandenburg Institute for Clinical Ultrasound (BICUS), Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Neuruppin, Germany
| | | | - Dieter Nürnberg
- Brandenburg Institute for Clinical Ultrasound (BICUS), Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Dmitrij Kravchenko
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tobias Raupach
- Institute for Medical Education, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Valentin Sebastian Schäfer
- Clinic of Internal Medicine III, Department of Oncology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Eimer C, Duschek M, Jung AE, Zick G, Caliebe A, Lindner M, Weiler N, Elke G. Video-based, student tutor- versus faculty staff-led ultrasound course for medical students - a prospective randomized study. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2020; 20:512. [PMID: 33327947 PMCID: PMC7741871 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02431-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ultrasound education is propagated already during medical school due to its diagnostic importance. Courses are usually supervised by experienced faculty staff (FS) with patient bedside examinations or students among each other but often overbooked due to limited FS availability. To overcome this barrier, use of teaching videos may be advantageous. Likewise, peer teaching concepts solely with trained student tutors have shown to be feasible and effective. The aim was to evaluate 1) objective learning outcomes of a combined video-based, student-tutor (ViST) as compared to a FS-led course without media support, 2) acceptance and subjective learning success of the videos. METHODS Two ultrasound teaching videos for basic and advanced abdominal ultrasound (AU) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were produced and six students trained as tutors. Fourth-year medical students (N = 96) were randomized to either the ViST- or FS course (6 students per tutor). Learning objectives were defined equally for both courses. Acquired practical basic and advanced ultrasound skills were tested in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) using modified validated scoring sheets with a maximum total score of 40 points. Acceptance and subjective learning success of both videos were evaluated by questionnaires based on Kirkpatrick's evaluation model with scale-rated closed and open questions. RESULTS 79 of 96 medical students completed the OSCE and 77 could be finally analyzed. There was no significant difference in the mean total point score of 31.3 in the ViST (N = 42) and 32.7 in the FS course (N = 35, P = 0.31) or in any of the examined basic or advanced ultrasound skill subtasks. Of the 42 ViST participants, 29 completed the AU and 27 the TTE video questionnaire. Acceptance and subjective learning success of both videos was rated positively in 14-52% and 48-88% of the rated responses to each category, respectively. Attendance of either the student or faculty tutor was deemed necessary in addition to the videos. CONCLUSIONS A ViST versus FS teaching concept was able to effectively teach undergraduate students in AU and TTE, albeit acceptance of the teaching videos alone was limited. However, the ViST concept has the potential to increase course availability and FS resource allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Eimer
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3 Haus R3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Max Duschek
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3 Haus R3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Andreas Emanuel Jung
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3 Haus R3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Günther Zick
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3 Haus R3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Amke Caliebe
- Institute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Matthias Lindner
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3 Haus R3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Norbert Weiler
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3 Haus R3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Gunnar Elke
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3 Haus R3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|