Cerebral White Matter Changes on Therapeutic Response to Rivastigmine in Alzheimer’s Disease

White matter hyperintensities in cholinergic pathways may predict poorer responsiveness to acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment for Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) drug regimens are the mainstay treatment options for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Herein, We examined the association between clinical response to AChEI and white matter hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan at baseline.

METHODS

Between 2020 and 2021, we recruited 101 individuals with a clinical diagnosis of probable AD. Each participant underwent complete neuropsychological testing and 3T (Telsa) brain magnetic resonance imaging. Responsiveness to AChEI, as assessed after 12 months, was designated as less than two points of regression in Mini-Mental State Examination scores (MMSE) and stable clinical dementia rating scale. We also evaluated MRI images by examining scores on the Cholinergic Pathways Hyperintensities Scale (CHIPS), Fazekas scale, and medial temporal atrophy (MTA) scale.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 52 patients (51.4%) were classified as responders. We observed significantly higher CHIPS scores in the nonresponder group (21.1 ± 12.9 vs. 14.9 ± 9.2, P = 0.007). Age at baseline, education level, sex, Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes scores, and three neuroimaging parameters were tested in regression models. Only CHIPS scores predicted clinical response to AChEI treatment.

CONCLUSION

WMHs in the cholinergic pathways, not diffuse white matter lesions or hippocampal atrophy, correlated with poorer responsiveness to AChEI treatment. Therefore, further investigation into the role of the cholinergic pathway in AD is warranted.

Predictors of response to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in dementia: A systematic review

Background

The mainstay of therapy for many neurodegenerative dementias still relies on acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEI); however, there is debate on various aspects of such treatment. A huge body of literature exists on possible predictors of response, but a comprehensive review is lacking. Therefore, our aim is to perform a systematic review of the predictors of response to AChEI in neurodegenerative dementias, providing a categorization and interpretation of the results.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of the literature up to December 31st, 2021, searching five different databases and registers, including studies on rivastigmine, donepezil, and galantamine, with clearly defined criteria for the diagnosis of dementia and the response to AChEI therapy. Records were identified through the string: predict * AND respon * AND (acetylcholinesterase inhibitors OR donepezil OR rivastigmine OR galantamine). The results were presented narratively.

Results

We identified 1,994 records in five different databases; after exclusion of duplicates, title and abstract screening, and full-text retrieval, 122 studies were finally included.

Discussion

The studies show high heterogeneity in duration, response definition, drug dosage, and diagnostic criteria. Response to AChEI seems associated with correlates of cholinergic deficit (hallucinations, fluctuating cognition, substantia innominate atrophy) and preserved cholinergic neurons (faster alpha on REM sleep EEG, increased anterior frontal and parietal lobe perfusion after donepezil); white matter hyperintensities in the cholinergic pathways have shown inconsistent results. The K-variant of butyrylcholinesterase may correlate with better response in late stages of disease, while the role of polymorphisms in other genes involved in the cholinergic system is controversial. Factors related to drug availability may influence response; in particular, low serum albumin (for donepezil), CYP2D6 variants associated with reduced enzymatic activity and higher drug doses are the most consistent predictors, while AChEI concentration influence on clinical outcomes is debatable. Other predictors of response include faster disease progression, lower serum cholesterol, preserved medial temporal lobes, apathy, absence of concomitant diseases, and absence of antipsychotics. Short-term response may predict subsequent cognitive response, while higher education might correlate with short-term good response (months), and long-term poor response (years). Age, gender, baseline cognitive and functional levels, and APOE relationship with treatment outcome is controversial.

Cerebrovascular Pathology and Responsiveness to Treatment in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Responsiveness to treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) is difficult to predict in Alzheimer's disease (AD). In the current review, vascular burden is considered as a potential moderator of treatment responsiveness. Cerebrovascular burden co-occurs in at least 30% of AD brains, although it is debated if vascular pathology plays a causal or synergistic role in AD pathogenesis. Vascular burden, therefore, could potentially limit response to treatment due to limited brain reserve or foster treatment efficacy as those with vascular pathology may represent a subgroup with comparable clinical expression but less progressed AD neurodegeneration.

METHODS

A systematic search of Web of Science, Pubmed, Scopus and EthoS identified 32 papers which met the criteria for inclusion. Association of treatment response and vascular burden across five broad markers are discussed: cerebral hypoperfusion, intima-media thickness, white matter changes, cerebral microbleeds and co-existing diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease.

RESULTS

Analysis of frontal regional cerebral blood flow and intima-media thickness may have predictive ability to distinguish those with AD who may respond optimally to short-term treatment with ChEIs. The impact of white matter changes is less consistent; the majority of studies demonstrates no association with treatment response and those that do implicate changes in executive functioning. There is preliminary evidence that deep cerebral microbleeds limit treatment response in subcortical cognitive domains, but this finding requires replication. The use of diagnosis of co-occurring cerebrovascular disease yields no robust variability in response to ChEIs in AD.

CONCLUSION

There is limited evidence that markers of cerebral hypoperfusion, intima-media thickness and cerebral microbleeds moderate response to ChEIs. Findings for other markers of vascular burden are less consistent and do not support any moderating effect.

Improving Anti-Neurodegenerative Benefits of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors in Alzheimer's Disease: Are Irreversible Inhibitors the Future?

Decades of research have produced no effective method to prevent, delay the onset, or slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In contrast to these failures, acetylcholinesterase (AChE, EC 3.1.1.7) inhibitors slow the clinical progression of the disease and randomized, placebo-controlled trials in prodromal and mild to moderate AD patients have shown AChE inhibitor anti-neurodegenerative benefits in the cortex, hippocampus, and basal forebrain. CNS neurodegeneration and atrophy are now recognized as biomarkers of AD according to the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) criteria and recent evidence shows that these markers are among the earliest signs of prodromal AD, before the appearance of amyloid. The current AChE inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine) have short-acting mechanisms of action that result in dose-limiting toxicity and inadequate efficacy. Irreversible AChE inhibitors, with a long-acting mechanism of action, are inherently CNS selective and can more than double CNS AChE inhibition possible with short-acting inhibitors. Irreversible AChE inhibitors open the door to high-level CNS AChE inhibition and improved anti-neurodegenerative benefits that may be an important part of future treatments to more effectively prevent, delay the onset, or slow the progression of AD.

Skinfold thickness for rivastigmine patch application in Alzheimer's disease

RATIONALE

Rivastigmine patches are used for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), but little is known about the serum concentration of rivastigmine and its metabolite or clinical adherence in relation to skinfold thickness after rivastigmine patch application.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine the association between rivastigmine and NAP 226-90 serum concentration and skinfold thickness and to determine the appropriate skinfold thickness for the use of rivastigmine patch in patients with AD.

METHODS

Patients with AD who continuously used rivastigmine patches (4.6 mg/24 h, 5 cm²) for more than 6 months were recruited. The serum concentrations of rivastigmine and NAP 226-90 were measured. Skinfold thickness was measured using a Lange Skinfold Caliper.

RESULTS

In total, 91 patients with AD (40 men and 51 women) participated in this study on skinfold thickness measurement. Among them, 27 patients were examined for rivastigmine and NAP 226-90 serum concentrations, with mean concentrations of 1.0 ± 0.6 ng/mL and 3.6 ± 3.6 ng/mL, respectively. The skinfold thickness in the subscapular area was significantly negatively correlated with the NAP 226-90 serum concentration (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = - 0.47, P = .01). In addition, patients with AD and a subscapular skinfold thickness of ≥25 mm exhibited a significantly high risk of decreased Mini-Mental Status Examination score and nonadherence to a rivastigmine patch (odds ratio 3.00; 95% confidence interval = 1.076-8.366, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Subscapular skinfold thickness was significantly negatively correlated with the NAP 226-90 serum concentration and may be considered an appropriate predictor of response and adherence to clinical application of a rivastigmine patch.