Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain Predicts Cognitive Progression in Prodromal and Clinical Dementia with Lewy Bodies

Association of Plasma Amyloid, P-Tau, GFAP, and NfL With CSF, Clinical, and Cognitive Features in Patients With Dementia With Lewy Bodies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Plasma β-amyloid-1-42/1-40 (Aβ42/40), phosphorylated-tau (P-tau), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light (NfL) have been widely examined in Alzheimer disease (AD), but little is known about their reflection of copathologies, clinical importance, and predictive value in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). We aimed to evaluate associations of these biomarkers with CSF amyloid, cognition, and core features in DLB.

METHODS

This cross-sectional multicenter cohort study with prospective component included individuals with DLB, AD, and healthy controls (HCs), recruited from 2002 to 2020 with an annual follow-up of up to 5 years, from the European-Dementia With Lewy Bodies consortium. Plasma biomarkers were measured by single-molecule array (Neurology 4-Plex E kit). Amyloid status was determined by CSF Aβ42 concentrations, and cognition was assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Biomarker differences across groups, associations with amyloid status, and clinical core features were assessed by analysis of covariance. Associations with cognitive impairment and decline were assessed by linear regression and linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

In our cohort consisting of 562 individuals (HC n = 89, DLB n = 342, AD n = 131; 250 women [44.5%], mean [SD] age of 71 [8] years), sex distribution did not differ between groups. Patients with DLB were significantly older, and had less years of education and worse baseline cognition than HC, but not AD. DLB participants stratified for amyloid status differed significantly in plasma Aβ42/40 ratio (decreased in amyloid abnormal: β = -0.008, 95% CI -0.016 to -0.0003, p = 0.01) and P-tau (increased in amyloid abnormal, P-tau181: β = 0.246, 95% CI 0.011-0.481; P-tau231: β = 0.227, 95% CI 0.035-0.419, both p < 0.05), but not in GFAP (β = 0.068, 95% CI -0.018 to 0.153, p = 0.119), and NfL (β = 0.004, 95% CI -0.087 to 0.096, p = 0.923) concentrations. Higher baseline GFAP, NfL, and P-tau concentrations were associated with lower MMSE scores in DLB, and GFAP and NfL were associated with a faster cognitive decline (GFAP: annual change of -2.11 MMSE points, 95% CI -2.88 to -1.35 MMSE points, p < 0.001; NfL: annual change of -2.13 MMSE points, 95% CI -2.97 to -1.29 MMSE points, p < 0.001). DLB participants with parkinsonism had higher concentrations of NfL (β = 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.14, p = 0.006) than those without.

DISCUSSION

Our study suggests a possible utility of plasma Aβ42/40, P-tau181, and P-tau231 as a noninvasive biomarkers to assess amyloid copathology in DLB, and plasma GFAP and NfL as monitoring biomarkers for cognitive symptoms in DLB.

Plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease in the continuum of dementia with Lewy bodies

INTRODUCTION

Patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) may have Alzheimers disease (AD) pathology that can be detected by plasma biomarkers. Our objective was to evaluate plasma biomarkers of AD and their association with positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers of amyloid and tau deposition in the continuum of DLB, starting from prodromal stages of the disease.

METHODS

The cohort included patients with isolated rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (iRBD), mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI-LB), or DLB, with a concurrent blood draw and PET scans.

RESULTS

Abnormal levels of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were found at the prodromal stage of MCI-LB in association with increased amyloid PET. Abnormal levels of plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau)-181 and neurofilament light (NfL) were found at the DLB stage. Plasma p-tau-181 showed the highest accuracy in detecting abnormal amyloid and tau PET in patients with DLB.

DISCUSSION

The range of AD co-pathology can be detected with plasma biomarkers in the DLB continuum, particularly with plasma p-tau-181 and GFAP.

Plasma proteomic profiles predict future dementia in healthy adults

The advent of proteomics offers an unprecedented opportunity to predict dementia onset. We examined this in data from 52,645 adults without dementia in the UK Biobank, with 1,417 incident cases and a follow-up time of 14.1 years. Of 1,463 plasma proteins, GFAP, NEFL, GDF15 and LTBP2 consistently associated most with incident all-cause dementia (ACD), Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD), and ranked high in protein importance ordering. Combining GFAP (or GDF15) with demographics produced desirable predictions for ACD (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.891) and AD (AUC = 0.872) (or VaD (AUC = 0.912)). This was also true when predicting over 10-year ACD, AD and VaD. Individuals with higher GFAP levels were 2.32 times more likely to develop dementia. Notably, GFAP and LTBP2 were highly specific for dementia prediction. GFAP and NEFL began to change at least 10 years before dementia diagnosis. Our findings strongly highlight GFAP as an optimal biomarker for dementia prediction, even more than 10 years before the diagnosis, with implications for screening people at high risk for dementia and for early intervention.

Aggregation and beyond: alpha-synuclein-based biomarkers in synucleinopathies

Parkinson's disease is clinically known for the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta and accumulation of intraneuronal cytoplasmic inclusions rich in alpha-synuclein called 'Lewy bodies' and 'Lewy neurites'. Together with dementia with Lewy bodies and multiple system atrophy, Parkinson's disease is part of a group of disorders called synucleinopathies. Currently, diagnosis of synucleinopathies is based on the clinical assessment which often takes place in advanced disease stages. While the causal role of alpha-synuclein aggregates in these disorders is still debatable, measuring the levels, types or seeding properties of different alpha-synuclein species hold great promise as biomarkers. Recent studies indicate significant differences in peptide, protein and RNA levels in blood samples from patients with Parkinson's disease. Seed amplification assays using CSF, blood, skin biopsy, olfactory swab samples show great promise for detecting synucleinopathies and even for discriminating between different synucleinopathies. Interestingly, small extracellular vesicles, such as exosomes, display differences in their cargoes in Parkinson's disease patients versus controls. In this update, we focus on alpha-synuclein aggregation and possible sources of disease-related species released in extracellular vesicles, which promise to revolutionize the diagnosis and the monitoring of disease progression.

Predicting neurodegeneration from sleep related biofluid changes

Sleep-wake disturbances are common in neurodegenerative diseases and may occur years before the clinical diagnosis, potentially either representing an early stage of the disease itself or acting as a pathophysiological driver. Therefore, discovering biomarkers that identify individuals with sleep-wake disturbances who are at risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases will allow early diagnosis and intervention. Given the association between sleep and neurodegeneration, the most frequently analyzed fluid biomarkers in people with sleep-wake disturbances to date include those directly associated with neurodegeneration itself, such as neurofilament light chain, phosphorylated tau, amyloid-beta and alpha-synuclein. Abnormalities in these biomarkers in patients with sleep-wake disturbances are considered as evidence of an underlying neurodegenerative process. Levels of hormonal sleep-related biomarkers such as melatonin, cortisol and orexin are often abnormal in patients with clinical neurodegenerative diseases, but their relationships with the more standard neurodegenerative biomarkers remain unclear. Similarly, it is unclear whether other chronobiological/circadian biomarkers, such as disrupted clock gene expression, are causal factors or a consequence of neurodegeneration. Current data would suggest that a combination of fluid biomarkers may identify sleep-wake disturbances that are most predictive for the risk of developing neurodegenerative disease with more optimal sensitivity and specificity.

Artificial intelligence for dementia drug discovery and trials optimization

Drug discovery and clinical trial design for dementia have historically been challenging. In part these challenges have arisen from patient heterogeneity, length of disease course, and the tractability of a target for the brain. Applying big data analytics and machine learning tools for drug discovery and utilizing them to inform successful clinical trial design has the potential to accelerate progress. Opportunities arise at multiple stages in the therapy pipeline and the growing availability of large medical data sets opens possibilities for big data analyses to answer key questions in clinical and therapeutic challenges. However, before this goal is reached, several challenges need to be overcome and only a multi-disciplinary approach can promote data-driven decision-making to its full potential. Herein we review the current state of machine learning applications to clinical trial design and drug discovery, while presenting opportunities and recommendations that can break down the barriers to implementation.

Neurofilaments - Small proteins of physiological significance and predictive power for future neurodegeneration and cognitive decline across the life span

Neurofilaments (NFs) are not only important for axonal integrity and nerve conduction in large myelinated axons but they are also thought to be crucial for receptor and synaptic functioning. Therefore, NFs may play a critical role in cognitive functions, as cognitive processes are known to depend on synaptic integrity and are modulated by dopaminergic signaling. Here, we present a theory-driven interdisciplinary approach that NFs may link inflammation, neurodegeneration, and cognitive functions. We base our hypothesis on a wealth of evidence suggesting a causal link between inflammation and neurodegeneration and between these two and cognitive decline (see Fig. 1), also taking dopaminergic signaling into account. We conclude that NFs may not only serve as biomarkers for inflammatory, neurodegenerative, and cognitive processes but also represent a potential mechanical hinge between them, moreover, they may even have predictive power regarding future cognitive decline. In addition, we advocate the use of both NFs and MRI parameters, as their synthesis offers the opportunity to individualize medical treatment by providing a comprehensive view of underlying disease activity in neurological diseases. Since our society will become significantly older in the upcoming years and decades, maintaining cognitive functions and healthy aging will play an important role. Thanks to technological advances in recent decades, NFs could serve as a rapid, noninvasive, and relatively inexpensive early warning system to identify individuals at increased risk for cognitive decline and could facilitate the management of cognitive dysfunctions across the lifespan.

Parkinson's disease relevant pathological features are manifested in male Pink1/Parkin deficient rats

Animal disease models are important for neuroscience experimentation and in the study of neurodegenerative disorders. The major neurodegenerative disorder leading to motor impairments is Parkinson's disease (PD). The identification of hereditary forms of PD uncovered gene mutations and variants, such as loss-of-function mutations in PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 (Pink1) and the E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin, two proteins involved in mitochondrial quality control, that could be harnessed to create animal models. However, to date, such models have not reproducibly recapitulated major aspects of the disease. Here, we describe the generation and phenotypic characterization of a combined Pink1/Parkin double knockout (dKO) rat, which reproducibly exhibits PD-relevant abnormalities, particularly in male animals. Motor dysfunction in Pink1/Parkin dKO rats was characterized by gait abnormalities and decreased rearing frequency, the latter of which was responsive to levodopa treatment. Pink1/Parkin dKO rats exhibited elevated plasma levels of neurofilament light chain and significant loss of tyrosine hydroxylase expression in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc). Glial cell activation was also observed in the SNpc. Pink1/Parkin dKO rats showed elevated plasma and reduced cerebrospinal levels of alpha-synuclein as well as the presence of alpha-synuclein aggregates in the striatum. Further, the profile of circulating lymphocytes was altered, as elevated CD3⁺CD4⁺ T cells and reduced CD3⁺CD8⁺ T cells in Pink1/Parkin dKO rats were found. This coincided with mitochondrial dysfunction and infiltration of CD3⁺ T cells in the striatum. Altogether, the Pink1/Parkin dKO rats exhibited phenotypes similar to what is seen with PD patients, thus highlighting the suitability of this model for mechanistic studies of the role of Pink1 and Parkin in PD pathogenesis and as therapeutic targets.

Misfolded alpha-synuclein detection by RT-QuIC in dementia with lewy bodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction: Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) is the second most common cause of neurodegenerative dementia after Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the field is still lacking a specific biomarker for its core pathology: alpha synuclein (α-syn). Realtime quaking induced conversion (RT-QuIC) has recently emerged as a strong biomarker candidate to detect misfolded α-syn in DLB. However, the variability in the parameters of the technique and the heterogeneity of DLB patients make the reproducibility of the results difficult. Here, we provide an overview of the state-of-the-art research of α-syn RT-QuIC in DLB focused on: (1) the capacity of α-syn RT-QuIC to discriminate DLB from controls, Parkinson's disease (PD) and AD; (2) the capacity of α-syn RT-QuIC to identify prodromal stages of DLB; and (3) the influence of co-pathologies on α-syn RT-QuIC's performance. We also assessed the influence of different factors, such as technical conditions (e.g., temperature, pH, shaking-rest cycles), sample type, and clinical diagnosis versus autopsy confirmation. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines in August 2022, without any limits in publication dates. Search terms were combinations of "RT-QuIC" and "Lewy Bodies," "DLB" or "LBD". Results: Our meta-analysis shows that α-syn RT-QuIC reaches very high diagnostic performance in discriminating DLB from both controls (pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.94 and 0.96, respectively) and AD (pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.95 and 0.88) and is promising for prodromal phases of DLB. However, the performance of α-syn RT-QuIC to discriminate DLB from PD is currently low due to low specificity (pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.94 and 0.11). Our analysis showed that α-syn RT-QuIC's performance is not substantially influenced by sample type or clinical diagnosis versus autopsy confirmation. Co-pathologies did not influence the performance of α-syn RT-QuIC, but the number of such studies is currently limited. We observed technical variability across published articles. However, we could not find a clear effect of technical variability on the reported results. Conclusion: There is currently enough evidence to test misfolded α-syn by RT-QuIC for clinical use. We anticipate that harmonization of protocols across centres and advances in standardization will facilitate the clinical establishment of misfolded α-syn detection by RT-QuIC.

Biomarkers of diagnosis, prognosis, pathogenesis, response to therapy: Convergence or divergence? Lessons from Alzheimer's disease and synucleinopathies

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common disorder associated with cognitive impairment. Recent observations emphasize the pathogenic role of multiple factors inside and outside the central nervous system, supporting the notion that AD is a syndrome of many etiologies rather than a "heterogeneous" but ultimately unifying disease entity. Moreover, the defining pathology of amyloid and tau coexists with many others, such as α-synuclein, TDP-43, and others, as a rule, not an exception. Thus, an effort to shift our AD paradigm as an amyloidopathy must be reconsidered. Along with amyloid accumulation in its insoluble state, β-amyloid is becoming depleted in its soluble, normal states, as a result of biological, toxic, and infectious triggers, requiring a shift from convergence to divergence in our approach to neurodegeneration. These aspects are reflected-in vivo-by biomarkers, which have become increasingly strategic in dementia. Similarly, synucleinopathies are primarily characterized by abnormal deposition of misfolded α-synuclein in neurons and glial cells and, in the process, depleting the levels of the normal, soluble α-synuclein that the brain needs for many physiological functions. The soluble to insoluble conversion also affects other normal brain proteins, such as TDP-43 and tau, accumulating in their insoluble states in both AD and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). The two diseases have been distinguished by the differential burden and distribution of insoluble proteins, with neocortical phosphorylated tau deposition more typical of AD and neocortical α-synuclein deposition peculiar to DLB. We propose a reappraisal of the diagnostic approach to cognitive impairment from convergence (based on clinicopathologic criteria) to divergence (based on what differs across individuals affected) as a necessary step for the launch of precision medicine.

Dementia with Lewy bodies: Impact of co-pathologies and implications for clinical trial design

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is clinically defined by the presence of visual hallucinations, fluctuations, rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavioral disorder, and parkinsonism. Neuropathologically, it is characterized by the presence of Lewy pathology. However, neuropathological studies have demonstrated the high prevalence of coexistent Alzheimer's disease, TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43), and cerebrovascular pathologic cases. Due to their high prevalence and clinical impact on DLB individuals, clinical trials should account for these co-pathologies in their design and selection and the interpretation of biomarkers values and outcomes. Here we discuss the frequency of the different co-pathologies in DLB and their cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical impact. We then evaluate the utility and possible applications of disease-specific and disease-nonspecific biomarkers and how co-pathologies can impact these biomarkers. We propose a framework for integrating multi-modal biomarker fingerprints and step-wise selection and assessment of DLB individuals for clinical trials, monitoring target engagement, and interpreting outcomes in the setting of co-pathologies.

Plasma Phosphorylated Tau181 and Amyloid-β42 in Dementia with Lewy Bodies Compared with Alzheimer's Disease and Cognitively Healthy People

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence illustrates the value of plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) to screen for and identify dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). However, confirmatory studies are needed to demonstrate the feasibility of these markers.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility of plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau181) and amyloid-β42 (Aβ42) as potential biomarkers to differentiate AD and DLB.

METHODS

We evaluated plasma samples from patients with DLB (n = 47) and AD (n = 55) and healthy controls (HCs, n = 30), using ELISAs to measure p-tau181 and Aβ42. Additionally, we examined neuropsychological assessment scores for participants. The plasma biomarkers were investigated for correlation with neuropsychological assessments and discriminant ability to identify DLB.

RESULTS

Plasma p-tau181 was significantly lower in DLB than in AD and HCs. Plasma Aβ42 was significantly higher in DLB than in AD but lower in DLB than in HCs. We found good correlations between plasma Aβ42 and neuropsychological scores in the whole cohort, while p-tau181 was associated with cognitive status in DLB. In the distinction between DLB and HCs, plasma p-tau181 and Aβ42 showed similar accuracy, while Aβ42 showed better accuracy than p-tau181 in discriminating DLB and AD.

CONCLUSION

In a single-center clinical cohort, we confirmed the high diagnostic value of plasma p-tau181 and Aβ42 for distinguishing patients with DLB from HCs. Plasma Aβ42 improved the differential diagnosis of DLB from AD.

Blood Neurofilament Light Chain in Different Types of Dementia

AIMS

The study aimed to evaluate diagnostic values of circulating neurofilament light chain (NFL) levels in different types of dementia.

BACKGROUND

Previous studies reported inconsistent change of blood NFL for different types of dementia, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD) and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) and Lewy body dementia (LBD).

OBJECTIVE

Meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the results of studies evaluating diagnostic values of circulating NFL levels in different types of dementia to enhance the strength of evidence.

METHODS

Articles evaluating change in blood NFL levels in dementia and published before July 2022 were searched on the following databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Medline and Google Scholar). The computed results were obtained by using STATA 12.0 software.

RESULTS

AD patients showed increased NFL concentrations in serum and plasma, compared to healthy controls (HC) (standard mean difference (SMD) = 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48, 1.70, I2 = 97.4%, p < 0.001). In AD patients, higher NFL concentrations in serum and plasma were associated with reduced cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ1-42, increased CSF t-tau, increased CSF p-tau, reduced Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and decreased memory. Additionally, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) showed elevated NFL concentrations in serum and plasma, compared to HC (SMD = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.87, I2 = 93.8%, p < 0.001). However, in MCI, no significant association was found between NFL concentrations in serum, plasma and memory or visuospatial function. No significant difference was found between preclinical AD and HC (SMD = 0.18, 95% CI: -0.10, 0.47, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.438). FTD patients showed increased NFL concentrations in serum and plasma, compared to HC (SMD = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.72, 1.43, I2 = 83.3%, p < 0.001). Higher NFL concentrations in serum and plasma were associated with increased CSF NFL in FTD. Additionally, the pooled parameters calculated were as follows: sensitivity, 0.82 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.90); specificity, 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.96). CJD patients showed increased NFL concentrations in serum and plasma, compared to HC. No significant difference in NFL level in serum and plasma was shown between AD and FTD (SMD = -0.03, 95% CI: -0.77, 0.72, I2 = 83.3%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the study suggested abnormal blood NFL level in AD and MCI, but not in preclinical AD. FTD and CJD showed abnormal blood NFL levels.

Plasma neurofilament light chain in memory clinic practice: Evidence from a real-life study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the accuracy of plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) as a biomarker for diagnosis and staging of cognitive impairment, in a large cohort with of previously diagnosed patients in clinical practice.

METHODS

Retrospective, cross-sectional, monocentric study, from a tertiary memory clinic. Patients underwent cerebrospinal fluid core Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker evaluation using ELISA or Elecsys methods, and plasma NfL analysis using the single molecule array technology. The patients' biomarker data were examined for associations with: i/cognitive status ii/presence of neurodegenerative disease and iii/diagnostic groups. Associations between core CSF biomarkers and plasma NfL were determined.

RESULTS

Participants (N = 558, mean age = 69.2 ± 8.8, 56.5% women) were diagnosed with AD (n = 274, considering dementia and MCI stages), frontotemporal dementia (FTD, n = 55), Lewy body disease (LBD, n = 40, considering MCI and dementia stages), other neurodegenerative diseases, n = 57 (e.g Supranuclear Palsy, Corticobasal syndrome), non-neurodegenerative cognitive impairment (NND, n = 79, e.g. vascular lesions, epilepsy or psychiatric disorders) or subjective cognitive impairment (SCI, n = 53). Mean plasma NfL (log, pg/mL) levels were higher in neurodegenerative than non-neurodegenerative disorders (1.35 ± 0.2 vs 1.16 ± 0.23, p < 0.001), higher in all diagnostic groups than in SCI (1.06 ± 0.23) p < 0.001), and associated with the stage of cognitive impairment (p < 0.001). The addition of plasma NfL to a clinical model (age, MMSE and APOE ε4 carriership) marginally improved the discrimination of degenerative from non-degenerative disorders in ROC analysis (AUC clinical model: 0.81, 95% CI = [0.77;0.85] AUC clinical model + plasma NfL: AUC = 0.83 95% CI = [0.78;0.87], delta Akaike information criterion = -11.7).

DISCUSSION

Plasma NfL could help discrimination between degenerative and non-degenerative cognitive disorders, albeit not better than comprehensive clinical evaluation.

The 2022 Lady Estelle Wolfson lectureship on neurofilaments

Neurofilament proteins (Nf) have been validated and established as a reliable body fluid biomarker for neurodegenerative pathology. This review covers seven Nf isoforms, Nf light (NfL), two splicing variants of Nf medium (NfM), two splicing variants of Nf heavy (NfH), α -internexin (INA) and peripherin (PRPH). The genetic and epigenetic aspects of Nf are discussed as relevant for neurodegenerative diseases and oncology. The comprehensive list of mutations for all Nf isoforms covers Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Charcot-Marie Tooth disease, Spinal muscular atrophy, Parkinson Disease and Lewy Body Dementia. Next, emphasis is given to the expanding field of post-translational modifications (PTM) of the Nf amino acid residues. Protein structural aspects are reviewed alongside PTMs causing neurodegenerative pathology and human autoimmunity. Molecular visualisations of NF PTMs, assembly and stoichiometry make use of Alphafold2 modelling. The implications for Nf function on the cellular level and axonal transport are discussed. Neurofilament aggregate formation and proteolytic breakdown are reviewed as relevant for biomarker tests and disease. Likewise, Nf stoichiometry is reviewed with regard to in vitro experiments and as a compensatory mechanism in neurodegeneration. The review of Nf across a spectrum of 87 diseases from all parts of medicine is followed by a critical appraisal of 33 meta-analyses on Nf body fluid levels. The review concludes with considerations for clinical trial design and an outlook for future research.

Blood based biomarkers for movement disorders

Movement disorders have been carefully clinically defined, based on clinico-pathological series; however there is often diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty, especially in early stage disease. Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD), particularly p-tau181 and p-tau217, may be useful in the movement disorder clinic, especially in identifying corticobasal syndrome due to AD pathology and in identifying Parkinson's disease (PD) patients at high risk for the future development of dementia. Serum or plasma neurofilament light (NfL) may be useful in separating Parkinson's plus syndromes (progressive supranuclear palsy-PSP, multiple system atrophy - MSA, and corticobasal syndrome-CBS) from PD. NfL is also a prognostic biomarker, in that the level of baseline or cross-sectional plasma/serum NfL is associated with a worse prognosis in PD and PSP. The development of protein aggregation assays in cerebrospinal fluid and multiplex assays which can measure 100 s-1000s of proteins in blood will provide new tools and insights for movement disorders for clinicians and researchers. The challenge is in efficiently integrating these tools into clinical practice and multi-modal approaches, where biomarkers are combined with clinical, genetic, and imaging data may guide the future use of these technologies.

Can We Treat Neurodegenerative Proteinopathies by Enhancing Protein Degradation?

Neurodegenerative proteinopathies are defined as a class of neurodegenerative disorders, with either genetic or sporadic age-related onset, characterized by the pathological accumulation of aggregated protein deposits. These mainly include Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Huntington's disease (HD) as well as frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). The deposition of abnormal protein aggregates in the brain of patients affected by these disorders is thought to play a causative role in neuronal loss and disease progression. On that account, the idea of improving the clearance of pathological protein aggregates has taken hold as a potential therapeutic strategy. Among the possible approaches to pursue for reducing disease protein accumulation, there is the stimulation of the main protein degradation machineries of eukaryotic cells: the ubiquitin proteasomal system (UPS) and autophagy lysosomal pathway (ALP). Of note, several clinical trials testing the efficacy of either UPS- or ALP-active compounds are currently ongoing. Here, we discuss the main gaps and controversies emerging from experimental studies and clinical trials assessing the therapeutic efficacy of modulators of either the UPS or ALP in neurodegenerative proteinopathies, to gather whether they may constitute a real gateway from these disorders. © 2022 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Differences Between Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid p-tau181 and p-tau231 in Early Alzheimer’s Disease

Plasma phosphorylated tau species have been recently proposed as peripheral markers of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology. In this cross-sectional study including 91 subjects, plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) p-tau181 and p-tau231 levels were elevated in the early symptomatic stages of AD. Plasma p-tau231 and p-tau181 were strongly related to CSF phosphorylated tau, total tau and amyloid and exhibited a high accuracy—close to CSF p-tau231 and p-tau181—to identify AD already in the early stage of the disease. The findings might support the use as diagnostic and prognostic peripheral AD biomarkers in both research and clinical settings.

Lights and Shadows of Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in the Current Alzheimer's Disease Framework

BACKGROUND

The most significant biomarkers that are included in the Alzheimer's disease (AD) research framework are amyloid-β plaques deposition, p-tau, t-tau, and neurodegeneration.Although cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are included in the most recent AD research criteria, their use is increasing in the routine clinical practice and is applied also to the preclinical phases of AD, including mild cognitive impairment. The role of these biomarkers is still unclear concerning the preclinical stage of AD diagnosis, the CSF methodology, and the costs-benefits of the biomarkers' tests. The controversies regarding the use of biomarkers in the clinical practice are related to the concepts of analytical validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility and to the question of whether they are able to diagnose AD without the support of AD clinical phenotypes.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present work is to expose the strengths and weaknesses of the use of CSF biomarkers in the diagnosis of AD in a clinical context.

METHODS

We used PubMed as main source for articles published and the final reference list was generated on the basis of relevance to the topics covered in this work.

RESULTS

The use of CSF biomarkers for AD diagnosis is certainly important but its indication in routine clinical practice, especially for prodromal conditions, needs to be regulated and also contextualized considering the variety of possible clinical AD phenotypes.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that the diagnosis of AD should be understood both as clinical and pathological.

Neurophysiological Correlates of Motor and Cognitive Dysfunction in Prodromal and Overt Dementia with Lewy Bodies

Background: The neurophysiological correlates of cognitive and motor symptoms in prodromal and overt dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are still to be elucidated. Objective: To evaluate if cognitive and motor features of patients with prodromal and overt DLB are associated with the impairment of specific neurotransmitter circuits, evaluated in vivo with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Methods: Fifty-one patients with DLB (twenty-five prodromal; twenty-six with dementia) underwent neuropsychological and clinical evaluation, with twenty-five patients having at least one follow-up evaluation. All patients were assessed with TMS at baseline, with protocols assessing cholinergic circuits (short latency afferent inhibition, SAI), GABAergic circuits (short interval intracortical inhibition, SICI), and glutamatergic circuits (intracortical facilitation, ICF). Results: Compared to HC, SICI, ICF, and SAI resulted significantly impaired in both prodromal and overt DLB, with the latter showing a reduced SICI and SAI also compared to prodromal DLB. There was a significant correlation between motor deficits, evaluated with the UPDRS-III, and the impairment of GABAergic (SICI) (r = 0.729, p <  0.001) and glutamatergic (ICF) (r –0.608, p <  0.001) circuits; global cognition, evaluated with the Mini-Mental State Examination, correlated with the impairment of cholinergic (SAI) circuits (r=–0.738, p <  0.001). Worsening of cognitive functions at follow-up was associated with reduced cholinergic functions at baseline (R2  = 0.53%, p <  0.001). Conclusion: These results suggest that motor and cognitive dysfunctions in prodromal and overt DLB depend on specific and independent neurotransmitter circuits.

Neurofilament Proteins as Biomarkers to Monitor Neurological Diseases and the Efficacy of Therapies

Biomarkers of neurodegeneration and neuronal injury have the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, disease monitoring, prognosis, and measure treatment efficacy. Neurofilament proteins (NfPs) are well suited as biomarkers in these contexts because they are major neuron-specific components that maintain structural integrity and are sensitive to neurodegeneration and neuronal injury across a wide range of neurologic diseases. Low levels of NfPs are constantly released from neurons into the extracellular space and ultimately reach the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood under physiological conditions throughout normal brain development, maturation, and aging. NfP levels in CSF and blood rise above normal in response to neuronal injury and neurodegeneration independently of cause. NfPs in CSF measured by lumbar puncture are about 40-fold more concentrated than in blood in healthy individuals. New ultra-sensitive methods now allow minimally invasive measurement of these low levels of NfPs in serum or plasma to track disease onset and progression in neurological disorders or nervous system injury and assess responses to therapeutic interventions. Any of the five Nf subunits - neurofilament light chain (NfL), neurofilament medium chain (NfM), neurofilament heavy chain (NfH), alpha-internexin (INA) and peripherin (PRPH) may be altered in a given neuropathological condition. In familial and sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD), plasma NfL levels may rise as early as 22 years before clinical onset in familial AD and 10 years before sporadic AD. The major determinants of elevated levels of NfPs and degradation fragments in CSF and blood are the magnitude of damaged or degenerating axons of fiber tracks, the affected axon caliber sizes and the rate of release of NfP and fragments at different stages of a given neurological disease or condition directly or indirectly affecting central nervous system (CNS) and/or peripheral nervous system (PNS). NfPs are rapidly emerging as transformative blood biomarkers in neurology providing novel insights into a wide range of neurological diseases and advancing clinical trials. Here we summarize the current understanding of intracellular NfP physiology, pathophysiology and extracellular kinetics of NfPs in biofluids and review the value and limitations of NfPs and degradation fragments as biomarkers of neurodegeneration and neuronal injury.