Association of APOE ɛ4 and Plasma p-tau181 with Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease and Longitudinal Change in Hippocampus Function

Plasma phospho-tau217 as a predictive biomarker for Alzheimer's disease in a large south American cohort

BACKGROUND

Blood-based Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers have been increasingly employed for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic monitoring purposes, due to accuracy in distinguishing AD pathophysiologic process. Compared to other p-tau isoforms, plasma p-tau217 exhibits stronger associations with AD hallmarks in CSF and brain. However, most studies have been conducted in non-Hispanic Whites, limiting our understanding of the performances and utility of these biomarkers across ethnicities.

METHODS

We examined a cohort of Peruvians from the GAPP study, a recently established cohort of Peruvian mestizos from Lima and indigenous groups from Southern Peru (Aymaras and Quechuas). We tested plasma levels of p-tau using the Quanterix Simoa ALZpathp-tau217 assay in 525 samples and tested the association between p-tau217 and clinical diagnosis (healthy controls n = 234 vs. AD n = 113) using generalized mixed regression models, adjusting for sex, age, education, APOE-e4 allele (fixed effects) and study site (random effect). We also tested biomarker levels in MCI (n = 178) vs. other groups. The receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (ROC-AUC) was used to evaluate the biomarker's classification performances.

RESULT

Participants showed on average 80% Native American ancestry. p-tau217 was significantly associated with AD (β = 2.61, 95%CI = 0.61-4.29) and its levels were inversely correlated with cognitive performances; p-tau217 levels did not differ between controls and MCI (p-value > 0.05). p-tau217 levels were higher in participants carrying at least one APOE-e4 allele (OR = 2.31, 95%CI = 1.85-2.90). The ROC-AUC for p-tau217 was estimated at 82.82% in the fully adjusted model.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest study conducted in a South American cohort phenotyped for AD with available p-tau217. Most investigations have previously focused on highly selected cohorts with established AD-endophenotypes (CSF biomarkers, autopsy report, PET etc.), while data on cohorts with clinical assessment are currently lacking, especially in non-European populations.

Added value of inflammatory plasma biomarkers to pathologic biomarkers in predicting preclinical Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND

Plasma biomarkers have recently emerged for the diagnosis, assessment, and disease monitoring of Alzheimer's disease (AD), but have yet to be fully validated in preclinical AD. In addition to AD pathologic plasma biomarkers (amyloid-β (Aβ) and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) species), a proteomic panel can discriminate between symptomatic AD and cognitively unimpaired older adults in a dementia clinic population.

OBJECTIVE

Examine the added value of a plasma proteomic panel, validated in symptomatic AD, over standard AD pathologic plasma biomarkers and demographic and genetic (apolipoprotein (APOE) ɛ4 status) risk factors in detecting preclinical AD.

METHODS

125 cognitively unimpaired older adults (mean age = 66 years) who completed Aβ PET and plasma draw were analyzed using multiple regression with Aβ PET status (positive versus negative) as the outcome to determine the best fit for predicting preclinical AD. Model 1 included age, education, and gender. Model 2 and 3 added predictors APOE ɛ4 status (carrier versus non-carrier) and AD pathologic blood biomarkers (Aβ42/40 ratio, p-tau181), respectively. Random forest modeling established the 5 proteomic markers from the proteomic panel that best predicted Aβ PET status, and these markers were added in Model 4.

RESULTS

The best model for predicting Aβ PET status included age, years of education, APOE ɛ4 status, Aβ42/40 ratio, and p-tau181. Adding the top 5 proteomic markers did not significantly improve the model.

CONCLUSIONS

Proteomic markers in plasma did not add predictive value to standard AD pathologic plasma biomarkers in predicting preclinical AD in this sample.

Changes in Alzheimer Disease Blood Biomarkers and Associations With Incident All-Cause Dementia

Importance

Plasma biomarkers show promise for identifying Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathology and neurodegeneration, but additional examination among diverse populations and throughout the life course is needed.

Objective

To assess temporal plasma biomarker changes and their association with all-cause dementia, overall and among subgroups of community-dwelling adults.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In 1525 participants from the US-based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, plasma biomarkers were measured using stored specimens collected in midlife (1993-1995, mean age 58.3 years) and late life (2011-2013, mean age 76.0 years; followed up to 2016-2019, mean age 80.7 years). Midlife risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, lipids, coronary heart disease, cigarette use, and physical activity) were assessed for their associations with change in plasma biomarkers over time. The associations of biomarkers with incident all-cause dementia were evaluated in a subpopulation (n = 1339) who were dementia-free in 2011-2013 and had biomarker measurements in 1993-1995 and 2011-2013.

Exposure

Plasma biomarkers of amyloid-β 42 to amyloid-β 40 (Aβ42:Aβ40) ratio, phosphorylated tau at threonine 181 (p-tau181), neurofilament light (NfL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were measured using the Quanterix Simoa platform.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Incident all-cause dementia was ascertained from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2019, from neuropsychological assessments, semiannual participant or informant contact, and medical record surveillance.

Results

Among 1525 participants (mean age, 58.3 [SD, 5.1] years), 914 participants (59.9%) were women, and 394 participants (25.8%) were Black. A total of 252 participants (16.5%) developed dementia. Decreasing Aβ42:Aβ40 ratio and increasing p-tau181, NfL, and GFAP were observed from midlife to late life, with more rapid biomarker changes among participants carrying the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOEε4) allele. Midlife hypertension was associated with a 0.15-SD faster NfL increase and a 0.08-SD faster GFAP increase per decade; estimates for midlife diabetes were a 0.11-SD faster for NfL and 0.15-SD faster for GFAP. Only AD-specific biomarkers in midlife demonstrated long-term associations with late-life dementia (hazard ratio per SD lower Aβ42:Aβ40 ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.21; per SD higher p-tau181, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25). All plasma biomarkers in late life had statistically significant associations with late-life dementia, with NfL demonstrating the largest association (1.92; 95% CI, 1.72-2.14).

Conclusions and Relevance

Plasma biomarkers of AD neuropathology, neuronal injury, and astrogliosis increase with age and are associated with known dementia risk factors. AD-specific biomarkers' association with dementia starts in midlife whereas late-life measures of AD, neuronal injury, and astrogliosis biomarkers are all associated with dementia.

Present and Future of Blood-Based Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease: Beyond the Classics

The field of blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) has advanced at an incredible pace, especially after the development of sensitive analytic platforms that can facilitate large-scale screening. Such screening will be important when more sophisticated diagnostic methods are scarce and expensive. Thus, blood-based biomarkers can potentially reduce diagnosis inequities among populations from different socioeconomic contexts. This large-scale screening can be performed so that older adults at risk of cognitive decline assessed using these methods can then undergo more complete assessments with classic biomarkers, increasing diagnosis efficiency and reducing costs to the health systems. Blood-based biomarkers can also aid in assessing the effect of new disease-modifying treatments. This paper reviews recent advances in the area, focusing on the following leading candidates for blood-based biomarkers: amyloid-beta (Aβ), phosphorylated tau isoforms (p-tau), neurofilament light (NfL), and glial fibrillary acidic (GFAP) proteins, as well as on new candidates, Neuron-Derived Exosomes contents (NDEs) and Transactive response DNA-binding protein-43 (TDP-43), based on data from longitudinal observational cohort studies. The underlying challenges of validating and incorporating these biomarkers into routine clinical practice and primary care settings are also discussed. Importantly, challenges related to the underrepresentation of ethnic minorities and socioeconomically disadvantaged persons must be considered. If these challenges are overcome, a new time of cost-effective blood-based biomarkers for AD could represent the future of clinical procedures in the field and, together with continued prevention strategies, the beginning of an era with a lower incidence of dementia worldwide.

Plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's and related dementias: A review and outlook for clinical neuropsychology

Recent technological advances have improved the sensitivity and specificity of blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Accurate quantification of amyloid-ß peptide, phosphorylated tau (pTau) isoforms, as well as markers of neurodegeneration (neurofilament light chain [NfL]) and neuro-immune activation (glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP] and chitinase-3-like protein 1 [YKL-40]) in blood has allowed researchers to characterize neurobiological processes at scale in a cost-effective and minimally invasive manner. Although currently used primarily for research purposes, these blood-based biomarkers have the potential to be highly impactful in the clinical setting - aiding in diagnosis, predicting disease risk, and monitoring disease progression. Whereas plasma NfL has shown promise as a non-specific marker of neuronal injury, plasma pTau181, pTau217, pTau231, and GFAP have demonstrated desirable levels of sensitivity and specificity for identification of individuals with Alzheimer's disease pathology and Alzheimer's dementia. In this forward looking review, we (i) provide an overview of the most commonly used blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, (ii) discuss how comorbid medical conditions, demographic, and genetic factors can inform the interpretation of these biomarkers, (iii) describe ongoing efforts to move blood-based biomarkers into the clinic, and (iv) highlight the central role that clinical neuropsychologists may play in contextualizing and communicating blood-based biomarker results for patients.

Innovative Multivariable Model Combining MRI Radiomics and Plasma Indexes Predicts Alzheimer's Disease Conversion: Evidence from a 2-Cohort Longitudinal Study

To explore the complementary relationship between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic and plasma biomarkers in the early diagnosis and conversion prediction of Alzheimer's disease (AD), our study aims to develop an innovative multivariable prediction model that integrates those two for predicting conversion results in AD. This longitudinal multicentric cohort study included 2 independent cohorts: the Sino Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Decline (SILCODE) project and the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). We collected comprehensive assessments, MRI, plasma samples, and amyloid positron emission tomography data. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to combine plasma and MRI radiomics biomarkers and generate a new composite indicator. The optimal model's performance and generalizability were assessed across populations in 2 cross-racial cohorts. A total of 897 subjects were included, including 635 from the SILCODE cohort (mean [SD] age, 64.93 [6.78] years; 343 [63%] female) and 262 from the ADNI cohort (mean [SD] age, 73.96 [7.06] years; 140 [53%] female). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the optimal model was 0.9414 and 0.8979 in the training and validation dataset, respectively. A calibration analysis displayed excellent consistency between the prognosis and actual observation. The findings of the present study provide a valuable diagnostic tool for identifying at-risk individuals for AD and highlight the pivotal role of the radiomic biomarker. Importantly, built upon data-driven analyses commonly seen in previous radiomics studies, our research delves into AD pathology to further elucidate the underlying reasons behind the robust predictive performance of the MRI radiomic predictor.

Evolution and Predictive Role of Plasma Alzheimer's Disease-related Pathological Biomarkers in Parkinson's Disease

Plasma Alzheimer's disease-related pathological biomarkers' role in Parkinson's disease (PD) remains unknown. We aimed to determine whether plasma Alzheimer's disease-related biomarkers can predict PD progression. A total of 184 PD patients and 86 healthy controls were included and followed up for 5 years. Plasma phosphorylated tau181 (p-tau181), Aβ40, and Aβ42 were measured at baseline and the 1- and 2-year follow-ups using the Quanterix-single-molecule array. Global cognitive function and motor symptoms were assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III. Genetic analyses were conducted to identify APOE and MAPT genotypes. Plasma p-tau181 levels were higher in PD than healthy controls. APOE-ε4 carriers had lower plasma Aβ42 levels and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio. The linear mixed-effects models showed that Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were associated with plasma p-tau181/Aβ42 ratio (β -1.719 [-3.398 to -0.040], p = .045). Higher baseline plasma p-tau181 correlated with faster cognitive decline and motor symptoms deterioration in total patients (β -0.170 [-0.322 to -0.018], p = .029; β 0.329 [0.032 to 0.626], p = .030) and APOE-ε4 carriers (β -0.318 [-0.602 to -0.034], p = .030; β 0.632 [0.017 to 1.246], p = .046), but not in the noncarriers. Higher baseline plasma Aβ40 correlated with faster cognitive decline in total patients (β -0.007 [-0.015 to -0.0001], p = .047) and faster motor symptoms deterioration in total patients (β 0.026 [0.010 to 0.041], p = .001) and APOE-ε4 carriers (β 0.044 [-0.026 to 0.049], p = .020), but not in the noncarriers. The plasma p-tau181/Aβ2 ratio monitors the cognitive status of PD. Higher baseline plasma p-tau181 and Aβ40 predict faster cognitive decline and motor symptoms deterioration in PD, especially in APOE-ε4 carriers.

Roles of ApoE4 on the Pathogenesis in Alzheimer's Disease and the Potential Therapeutic Approaches

The Apolipoprotein E ε4 (ApoE ε4) allele, encoding ApoE4, is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD). Emerging epidemiological evidence indicated that ApoE4 contributes to AD through influencing β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition and clearance. However, the molecular mechanisms of ApoE4 involved in AD pathogenesis remains unclear. Here, we introduced the structure and functions of ApoE isoforms, and then we reviewed the potential mechanisms of ApoE4 in the AD pathogenesis, including the effect of ApoE4 on Aβ pathology, and tau phosphorylation, oxidative stress; synaptic function, cholesterol transport, and mitochondrial dysfunction; sleep disturbances and cerebrovascular integrity in the AD brains. Furthermore, we discussed the available strategies for AD treatments that target to ApoE4. In general, this review overviews the potential roles of ApoE4 in the AD development and suggests some therapeutic approaches for AD. ApoE4 is genetic risk of AD. ApoE4 is involved in the AD pathogenesis. Aβ deposition, NFT, oxidative stress, abnormal cholesterol, mitochondrial dysfunction and neuroinflammation could be observed in the brains with ApoE4. Targeting the interaction of ApoE4 with the AD pathology is available strategy for AD treatments.

Apolipoprotein ε in Brain and Retinal Neurodegenerative Diseases

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia that remains incurable and has become a major medical, social, and economic challenge worldwide. AD is characterized by pathological hallmarks of senile plaques (SP) and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) that damage the brain up to twenty years before a clinical diagnosis is made. Interestingly these pathological features have also been observed in retinal neurodegenerative diseases including age related macular degeneration (ARMD), glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy (DR). An association of AD with these diseases has been suggested in epidemiological studies and several common pathological events and risk factors have been identified between these diseases. The E4 allele of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) is a well-established genetic risk factor for late onset AD. The ApoE ε4 allele is also associated with retinal neurodegenerative diseases however in contrast to AD, it is considered protective in AMD, likewise ApoE E2 allele, which is a protective factor for AD, has been implicated as a risk factor for AMD and glaucoma. This review summarizes the evidence on the effects of ApoE in retinal neurodegenerative diseases and discusses the overlapping molecular pathways in AD. The involvement of ApoE in regulating amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau pathology, inflammation, vascular integrity, glucose metabolism and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling is also discussed.

APOE differentially moderates cerebrospinal fluid and plasma phosphorylated tau181 associations with multi-domain cognition

Biofluid markers of phosphorylated tau181 (p-tau181) are increasingly popular for the detection of early Alzheimer's pathologic changes. However, the differential dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma p-tau181 remain under investigation. We studied 727 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative with plasma and CSF p-tau181 data, apolipoprotein (APOE) ε4 carrier status, amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, and neuropsychological data. Higher levels of plasma and CSF p-tau181 were observed among APOE ε4 carriers. CSF and plasma p-tau181 were significantly associated with memory, and this effect was greater in APOE ε4 carriers. However, whereas CSF p-tau181 was not significantly associated with language or attention/executive function among ε4 carriers or non-carriers, APOE ε4 status moderated the association of plasma p-tau181 with both language and attention/executive function. These findings lend support to the notion that p-tau181 biofluid markers are useful in measuring AD pathologic changes but also suggest that CSF and plasma p-tau181 have unique properties and dynamics that should be considered when using these markers in research and clinical practice.

Association of APOE ε4/ε4 with fluid biomarkers in patients from the PUMCH dementia cohort

Background

Apolipoprotein-E (APOE) ε4 is a major genetic risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Current studies, which were mainly based on the clinical diagnosis rather than biomarkers, come to inconsistent conclusions regarding the associations of APOE ε4 homozygotes (APOE ε4/ε4) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of AD. In addition, few studies have explored the associations of APOE ε4/ε4 with plasma biomarkers. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the associations of APOE ε4/ε4 with fluid biomarkers in dementia and biomarker-diagnosed AD.

Methods

A total of 297 patients were enrolled. They were classified into Alzheimer’s continuum, AD, and non-AD, according to CSF biomarkers and/or β amyloid PET results. AD was a subgroup of the AD continuum. Plasma Amyloid β (Aβ) 40, Aβ42, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain (NFL), and phosphorylated tau (P-tau)181 were quantified in 144 of the total population using an ultra-sensitive Simoa technology. We analyzed the associations of APOE ε4/ε4 on CSF and plasma biomarkers in dementia and biomarker diagnosed AD.

Results

Based on the biomarker diagnostic criteria, 169 participants were diagnosed with Alzheimer’s continuum and 128 individuals with non-AD, and among the former, 120 patients with AD. The APOE ε4/ε4 frequencies were 11.8% (20/169), 14.2% (17/120), and 0.8% (1/128) in Alzheimer’s continuum, AD and non-AD, respectively. Only CSF Aβ42 was shown to be decreased in APOE ε4/ε4 carriers than in non-carriers for patients with AD (p = 0.024). Furthermore, we did not find any associations of APOE ε4 with plasma biomarkers of AD and non-AD. Interestingly, we found that in non-AD patients, APOE ε4 carriers had lower CSF Aβ42 (p = 0.018) and higher T-tau/Aβ42 ratios (p < 0.001) and P-tau181/Aβ42 ratios (p = 0.002) than non-carriers.

Conclusion

Our data confirmed that of the three groups (AD continuum, AD, and non-AD), those with AD had the highest frequency of APOE ɛ4/ɛ4 genotypes. The APOE ɛ4/ɛ4 was associated with CSF levels of Aβ42 but not tau for AD and non-AD, suggesting that APOE ɛ4/ɛ4 affected the Aβ metabolism of both. No associations between APOE ε4/ɛ4 and plasma biomarkers of AD and non-AD were found.

APOE ε4 status and plasma p-tau181 interact to influence cognitive performance among non-demented older adults

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationships among plasma p-tau181, APOE ε4, and cognitive performance in non-demented elderly individuals.

METHODS

We used individuals (n = 630) with cognitive normal (CN, n = 182) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 448). Multiple linear regression models were performed to test the effects of APOE ε4 × plasma p-tau181 interaction on MMSE, CDR-SOB, ADAS-cog13, and RAVLT immediate recall. All models adjusted for age, sex, and education.

RESULTS

In total, our study comprised 630 samples including 364 APOE ε4 non-carriers and 266 APOE ε4 carriers. In APOE ε4 carriers, plasma p-tau181 was significantly associated with MMSE (B = -0.04, p = 0.003), ADAS-Cog13 (B [unstandardized coefficient] = 0.21, p < 0.001), CDR-SB (B = 0.02, p = 0.003) and RAVLT immediate recall ((B = -0.17, p = 0.035). After correcting for Aβ status and diagnosis, the interaction between APOE ε4 and plasma p-tau181 was significant or marginally significant associations for RAVLT immediate recall (p = 0.076), MMSE (p = 0.011), CDR (p = 0.008), and ADAS-Cog13 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that plasma p-tau181 levels predicted cognitive performance among non-demented older adults, but only in the APOE ε4 carriers.

APOEɛ4 Status and Plasma p-tau181 Levels May Influence Memory and Executive Function Decline in Older Adults Without Dementia

BACKGROUND

Elevated tau phosphorylation has been linked to the Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ɛ4 allele, which is considered one of the most significant genes related to Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, it is uncertain whether the impact of increased plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau181) on memory and executive function decline would be greater among APOEɛ4 carriers.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of plasma p-tau181 and APOEɛ4 on memory and executive function.

METHODS

The longitudinal analysis included 608 older adults without dementia (aged 72±7 years; 47% female; follow-up period of 1.59±1.47 years) from the ADNI dataset, including 180 individuals with normal cognition and 429 individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Linear mixed-effects models were utilized to assess the contributions of APOEɛ4 status and plasma p-tau181 to longitudinal changes in memory composite score and executive function composite score.

RESULTS

At baseline, the APOEɛ4+/Tau+ group exhibited poorer performance in memory composite score and executive function composite score, and an elevated load of cerebrospinal fluid Aβ and tau pathologies. To further understand longitudinal changes, we compared groups directly based on plasma p-tau181 and APOEɛ4 status (four groups: APOEɛ4-/Tau-, APOEɛ4-/Tau+, APOEɛ4+/Tau-, APOEɛ4+/Tau+). Both the memory composite score and executive function composite score showed a significantly greater decline in the APOEɛ4+/Tau+ group than in all other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that there is an interaction between plasma p-tau181 levels and APOEɛ4 status, which contributes to the longitudinal changes of memory and executive function in older adults without dementia.

Developments in scalable strategies for detecting early markers of cognitive decline

Effective strategies for early detection of cognitive decline, if deployed on a large scale, would have individual and societal benefits. However, current detection methods are invasive or time-consuming and therefore not suitable for longitudinal monitoring of asymptomatic individuals. For example, biological markers of neuropathology associated with cognitive decline are typically collected via cerebral spinal fluid, cognitive functioning is evaluated from face-to-face assessments by experts and brain measures are obtained using expensive, non-portable equipment. Here, we describe scalable, repeatable, relatively non-invasive and comparatively inexpensive strategies for detecting the earliest markers of cognitive decline. These approaches are characterized by simple data collection protocols conducted in locations outside the laboratory: measurements are collected passively, by the participants themselves or by non-experts. The analysis of these data is, in contrast, often performed in a centralized location using sophisticated techniques. Recent developments allow neuropathology associated with potential cognitive decline to be accurately detected from peripheral blood samples. Advances in smartphone technology facilitate unobtrusive passive measurements of speech, fine motor movement and gait, that can be used to predict cognitive decline. Specific cognitive processes can be assayed using 'gamified' versions of standard laboratory cognitive tasks, which keep users engaged across multiple test sessions. High quality brain data can be regularly obtained, collected at-home by users themselves, using portable electroencephalography. Although these methods have great potential for addressing an important health challenge, there are barriers to be overcome. Technical obstacles include the need for standardization and interoperability across hardware and software. Societal challenges involve ensuring equity in access to new technologies, the cost of implementation and of any follow-up care, plus ethical issues.