Methods of surfactant administration and early ventilation in neonatal intensive care units in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory

New modes of surfactant delivery

The provision of exogenous surfactant to premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome has revolutionized the way we care for these patients, significantly improving survival and decreasing morbidity. Currently, the Intubate-SURfactant-Extubate (INSURE) to non-invasive ventilation method remains the standard method for surfactant delivery in the United States. However, the INSURE method requires intubation via direct visualization with a laryngoscope and possible need for sedation. Both carry significant risk to the patients, prompting the development of less invasive ways of safely and efficaciously providing surfactant to newborn infants. The present article reviews and describes the benefits and limitations of several of these alternative methods, including Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA), Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy (MIST), via aerosolization, laryngeal mask airway (LMA), and direct nasopharyngeal deposition, focusing on assessment of clinical benefits and the level/risk of invasiveness.

Surfactant delivery via thin catheters: Methods, limitations, and outcomes

Various less invasive surfactant administration strategies like surfactant replacement therapy via thin catheters, laryngeal mask airway, pharyngeal instillation, and nebulized surfactant are increasingly being practiced to avoid the harmful effects of endotracheal intubation and ventilation. Numerous studies have been done to study surfactant replacement via thin catheters whereas little data is available for other methods. However, there are variations in premedication policies, type of respiratory support used in these studies. Surfactant delivery using thin catheters has been reported to be associated with decrease in the need for mechanical ventilation (MV), duration of MV, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and neonatal mortality. With the current evidence, among all the available surfactant delivery methods, the one using thin catheters appears to be the most feasible and beneficial to improve clinical neonatal outcomes.

Comparative efficacy of methods for surfactant administration: a network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare surfactant administration via thin catheters, laryngeal mask, nebulisation, pharyngeal instillation, intubation and surfactant administration followed by immediate extubation (InSurE) and no surfactant administration.

DESIGN

Network meta-analysis.

SETTING

Medline, Scopus, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Google-scholar and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were systematically searched from inception to 15 February 2020.

PATIENTS

Preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome.

INTERVENTIONS

Less invasive surfactant administration.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes were mortality, mechanical ventilation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

RESULTS

Overall, 16 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 20 observational studies were included (N=13 234). For the InSurE group, the median risk of mortality, mechanical ventilation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia were 7.8%, 42.1% and 10%, respectively. Compared with InSurE, administration via thin catheter was associated with significantly lower rates of mortality (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.76), mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.63), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.73), periventricular leukomalacia (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.82) with moderate quality of evidence and necrotising enterocolitis (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.9, low quality of evidence). No significant differences were observed by comparing InSurE with administration via laryngeal mask, nebulisation or pharyngeal instillation. In RCTs, thin catheter administration lowered the rates of mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.60) but not the incidence of the remaining outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Among preterm infants, surfactant administration via thin catheters was associated with lower likelihood of mortality, need for mechanical ventilation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia compared with InSurE. Further research is needed to reach firm conclusions about the efficacy of alternative minimally invasive techniques of surfactant administration.

A comparison of LISA versus InSurE: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

Less invasive surfactant replacement therapy (SRT) methods have been linked to better respiratory outcomes. The primary aim of this study was to determine if Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) altered the rate of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants. Secondary objectives were to determine if LISA compared to Intubation Surfactant Extubation (InSurE) resulted in different respiratory outcomes and hospital course.

METHODS

In this retrospective chart review, outcomes were compared in two preterm infant groups (25-32 weeks gestation). Infants in Group 1 received surfactant replacement therapy (SRT) via InSurE method, while infants in Group 2 received SRT via LISA method.

RESULTS

Regardless of SRT method utilized, there were no significant differences in rates of BPD between the two groups in infants born at 25-32 weeks gestation (30.6% vs 33.3%; P = 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite using LISA method rather than InSurE for SRT, premature infants continue to be at high risk for BPD. LISA shows promise as a safe, noninvasive SRT alternative to invasive methods like InSurE.