Intensive rehabilitation for functional motor disorders (FMD) in the United States: A review

The Current State of Pediatric Functional Neurological Disorder Treatment in the United States

BACKGROUND

Pediatric functional neurological disorders (FNDs) are common but grossly under-researched. This survey study aims to define the current landscape of pediatric FND treatment in the United States, identifying treatment programs, care team composition, treatment approaches, and aftercare management.

METHODS

The Functional Neurological Disorder Society (FNDS) Pediatric Special Interest Group (SIG), a diverse set of clinician and caregiver stakeholders, collected information on available treatment programs in the United States via survey. Current programs were identified through the FNDS Pediatric SIG and FND Hope's provider registry.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine care team members from 24 health care centers yielded 31 unique FND treatment settings. Centers existed in 16 states, concentrated in the Midwest and Southern regions. Outpatient settings (62%) were more prevalent than inpatient. A psychologist (PhD/PsyD) was the most common clinician (52%) with dedicated time to treat FNDs. Most settings accepted ages six to 21 (55%) and treated all FND symptoms (77%). A spectrum of treatment approaches was endorsed with the most common being cognitive behavioral therapy (77%) and personalized approaches (58%). A biopsychosocial approach was evident, with most settings reporting active involvement with school (97%) and caregivers (94%). Most settings (74%) encouraged treatment re-engagement when needed with no strict time limits. All respondents provided aftercare recommendations or referrals.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric FND treatment is available across the United States, but there is high variability in care team membership, treatment approach, and aftercare management. Future research is necessary to develop effective and sustainable treatment to improve access for this population.

[Transdisciplinary treatment of functional movement disorders: integration instead of dissociation]

Successful treatment of patients with functional motor disorders is integrative in several ways: the primary treatment goal is the (re)integration of sensorimotor, cognitive and social functioning. The prerequisites for this are an integrated biopsychosocial model of everyone involved as well as close transdisciplinary cooperation. Instead of a simple addition of treatment components, all care providers and patients act in concert.

Setting up Functional Neurological Disorder Treatment Services: Questions and Answers

Functional neurologic disorder (FND) is commonly encountered across outpatient and inpatient medical settings. Given the potential for a high burden of disability in some patients and mounting evidence for the efficacy of FND-specific multidisciplinary treatment services, expanding clinical services for this population is a necessity. In this perspective article, we discuss considerations for creating FND services, including the types of services that exist, how to start, how to identify appropriate referrals, and how to develop and monitor individualized treatment plans. In addition, we discuss how this effort can be done sustainably - balancing patient needs with limited healthcare resources.

Improvement in motor symptoms, physical fatigue, and self-rated change perception in functional motor disorders: a prospective cohort study of a 12-week telemedicine program

BACKGROUND

Functional motor disorders (FMDs) are highly disabling conditions associated with long-term disability, poor quality of life, and economic burden on health and social care. While multidisciplinary 5-days rehabilitation programs have been shown to reduce motor and non-motor symptoms, long-term management and monitoring in FMDs remain an unmet need.

AIM

To compare a 12-weeks telemedicine program against a 12-weeks self-management program after a 5-days rehabilitation program for improving motor, non-motor symptoms, quality of life, and perception of change in patients with FMDs.

METHODS

The study population was 64 consecutive patients with a definite diagnosis of FMDs who underwent a 5-days in-person rehabilitation program followed by either a self-management (the first 32 patients) or a telemedicine program (the latter 32 patients). Validated measures of motor and non-motor symptoms such as fatigue and pain, quality of life, perception of change, gait, and postural control were recorded before (T0), after completion of rehabilitation (T1), and then again at 3 months (T2).

RESULTS

Improvement at 3-month follow-up assessment of motor symptoms (p < 0.001), physical fatigue (p = 0.028), and self-rated change perception (p = 0.043) was greater in the telemedicine group. No different between-groups effect was found on other dimensions of fatigue, pain, physical and mental health, and gait and postural control.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term management and expert monitoring of patients with FMDs via telemedicine may enhance long-term outcomes in motor symptoms and physical fatigue, with a positive long-term impact on self-rated health perception of change.