Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo in renal and adrenal computed tomography

Improving lesion conspicuity in abdominal dual-energy CT with deep learning image reconstruction: a prospective study with five readers

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate image quality, diagnostic acceptability, and lesion conspicuity in abdominal dual-energy CT (DECT) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) compared to those using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (Asir-V) at 50% blending (AV-50), and to identify potential factors impacting lesion conspicuity.

METHODS

The portal-venous phase scans in abdominal DECT of 47 participants with 84 lesions were prospectively included. The raw data were reconstructed to virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) at 50 keV using filtered back-projection (FBP), AV-50, and DLIR at low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high strength (DLIR-H). A noise power spectrum (NPS) was generated. CT number and standard deviation values of eight anatomical sites were measured. Signal-to-noise (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values were calculated. Five radiologists assessed image quality in terms of image contrast, image noise, image sharpness, artificial sensation, and diagnostic acceptability, and evaluated the lesion conspicuity.

RESULTS

DLIR further reduced image noise (p < 0.001) compared to AV-50 while better preserved the average NPS frequency (p < 0.001). DLIR maintained CT number values (p > 0.99) and improved SNR and CNR values compared to AV-50 (p < 0.001). DLIR-H and DLIR-M showed higher ratings in all image quality analyses than AV-50 (p < 0.001). DLIR-H provided significantly better lesion conspicuity than AV-50 and DLIR-M regardless of lesion size, relative CT attenuation to surrounding tissue, or clinical purpose (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DLIR-H could be safely recommended for routine low-keV VMI reconstruction in daily contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT to improve image quality, diagnostic acceptability, and lesion conspicuity.

KEY POINTS

• DLIR is superior to AV-50 in noise reduction, with less shifts of the average spatial frequency of NPS towards low frequency, and larger improvements of NPS noise, noise peak, SNR, and CNR values. • DLIR-M and DLIR-H generate better image quality in terms of image contrast, noise, sharpness, artificial sensation, and diagnostic acceptability than AV-50, while DLIR-H provides better lesion conspicuity than AV-50 and DLIR-M. • DLIR-H could be safely recommended as a new standard for routine low-keV VMI reconstruction in contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT to provide better lesion conspicuity and better image quality than the standard AV-50.