Opioid Rotation in Cancer Pain Treatment

Low-dose methadone added to another opioid for cancer pain: a multicentre prospective study

CONTEXT

The use of methadone for cancer pain management is gaining wider acceptance. However, switching to methadone treatment can still pose challenges. Consequently, there is ongoing development of its use in low doses in combination with other opioids, despite a lack of clinical evidence regarding its efficacy and safety.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of low-dose methadone in combination with another opioid in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain in a clinical setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, open-label study conducted in 19 pain and/or palliative care centres treating patients with cancer-related pain. Pain intensity, patients' global impression of change, and adverse effects were assessed on day 7 and day 14. The main outcome measure was the proportion of responders.

RESULTS

The study included 92 patients. The daily dose of methadone was 3 [3-6] mg at baseline, 9 [4-10] mg on day 7 and 10 [6-15] mg on day 14. The NRS pain ratings significantly decreased from 7 [6-8] at baseline to 5 [3-6] on visit 2 (p < .0001) and 4 [3-6] on visit 3 (p < .0001). Similarly, the VRS pain ratings decreased from 3 [3-3] at baseline to 2 [2-3] on visit 2 (p = 0.026) and 2 [1-3] (p < 0.001) on visit 3. At Visits 1 and 2, half of the patients were considered Responders. Of those responders, 73.5% were High-Responders at Visit 1 and 58.7% were High-Responders at Visit 2. No adverse events related to the risk of QT prolongation, overdose, or drug interactions were reported.

CONCLUSION

For patients experiencing moderate to severe cancer-related pain despite initial opioid treatment, our study found that low-dose methadone, when used in combination with another opioid, was both safe and effective. This supports the use of methadone as an adjunct to opioid-based treatment for cancer pain.

Opioid analgesic dose and route conversion ratio studies: a scoping review to inform an eDelphi guideline

BACKGROUND

Clinicians regularly prescribe opioids to manage acute and chronic cancer pain, frequently to address acute postoperative pain, and occasionally to manage chronic non-cancer pain. Clinical efficacy may be suboptimal in some patients due to side effects and/or poor response, and opioid rotation/switching (conversions) is frequently necessary. Despite the widespread practice, opioid conversion ratios are inconsistent between clinicians, practices, and countries. Therefore, we performed a scoping systematic review of opioid conversion studies to inform an international eDelphi guideline.

METHODS

To ensure a comprehensive review, we conducted a systematic search across multiple databases (OVID Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, EBM-Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Registered Trials, LILACS, IMEMR, AIM, WPRIM) using studies published up to June 2022. Additionally, we performed hand and Google Scholar searches to verify the completeness of our findings. Our inclusion criteria encompassed randomized and non-randomized studies with no age limit, with only a few pediatric studies identified. We included studies on cancer, non-cancer, acute, and chronic pain. The level and grade of evidence were determined based on the Multinational Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) criteria.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 21,118 abstracts, including 140 randomized (RCT) and 68 non-randomized (NRCT) clinical trials. We compared these results with recently published conversion ratios. Modest correlations were noted between published reviews and the present scoping systematic review.

CONCLUSION

The present scoping systematic review found low-quality evidence to support an opioid conversion guideline. We will use these data, including conversion ratios and type and route of administration, to inform an eDelphi guideline.

Transitional Changes of Anxiety, Pain and Other Symptoms in Cancer Patients Admitted to a Palliative Care Unit, Evaluated Using the Support Team Assessment Schedule - Japanese Version

Objective: Association between physical symptoms and psychosocial difficulties of cancer patients has been reported widely. Nevertheless, the effects of pain and other symptom control on anxiety in such patients have not been investigated well. We investigated the association of improvement of pain and other symptoms with patient anxiety, and assessed factors associated with improvement of such symptoms. Methods: Data of patients with advanced cancer admitted to a palliative care unit during August 2018 - June 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Severity of pain, other symptoms, and anxiety was assessed by the Support Team Assessment Schedule Japanese version (STAS-J) administered at admission and after 2 weeks. Patients' physical data, their Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI) at admission, and their overall survival were collected and recorded. Results: Data of 701 patients were analyzed. Improvement of pain or other symptoms after 2 weeks was not associated with the PPI total score or actual survival (P = .105 and .999). Patients with higher anxiety on admission experienced improvement of pain or other symptoms more frequently (P = .005). Worsening of anxiety was observed less in patients who experienced improvement in pain or other symptoms after 2 weeks (P = .027). Conclusion: Pain or other symptoms of patients with advanced cancer was improved irrespective of the general condition indicated with actual survival and prognosis-predictive factors. These findings suggest the importance of pain and other symptoms' improvement and its important roles in the management of patient psychosocial problems such as anxiety.

Conversion ratios: Why is it so challenging to construct opioid conversion tables?

Standardizing opioid management is challenging due to the absence of a ceiling dose, the unknown ideal therapeutic plasma level, and the lack of an clear relationship between dose and therapeutic response. Opioid rotation or conversion, which is switching from one opioid, route of administration, or both, to another, to improve therapeutic response and reduce toxicities, occurs in 20-40 percent of patients treated with opioids. Opioid conversion is often needed when there are adverse effects, toxicities, or inability to tolerate a certain opioid formulation. A majority of patients benefit from opioid conversion, leading to improved analgesia and less adverse effects. There are different published ways of converting opioids in the literature. This review of 20 years of literature is centered on opioid conversions and aims to discuss the complexity of converting opioids. We discuss study designs, outcomes and measures, pain phenotypes, patient characteristics, comparisons of equivalent doses between opioids, reconciling conversion ratios between opioids, routes, directional differences, half-lives and metabolites, interindividual variability, and comparison to package insert information. Palliative care specialists have not yet come to a consensus on the ideal opioid equianalgesic table; however, we discuss a recently updated table, based on retrospective evidence, that may serve as a gold standard for practical use in the palliative care population. More robust, well-designed studies are needed to validate and guide future opioid conversion data.

Opioid Switch Dosing in Chronic Cancer Pain: A Prospective Longitudinal Study

Background: Opioid switching is common, however, conversion tables have limitations. Guidelines suggest postswitch dose reduction, yet, observations show opioid doses may increase postswitch. Objectives: To document the opioid conversion factor postswitch in cancer, and whether pain and adverse effect outcomes differ between switched opioid groups. Design/Setting: This multicenter prospective longitudinal study included people with advanced cancer in Australia. Clinical data (demographics, opioids) and validated instruments (pain, adverse effects) were collected twice, seven days apart. Results: Opioid switch resulted in dose increase (median oral morphine equivalent daily dose 90 mg [interquartile range {IQR} 45-184] to 150 mg [IQR 79-270]), reduced average pain (5.1 [standard deviation {SD} 1.7] to 3.8 [SD 1.6]), and reduced adverse effects. Hydromorphone dose increased 2.5 times (IQR 1.0-3.6) above the original conversion factor used. Conclusions: Opioid switching resulted in overall dose increase, particularly when switching to hydromorphone. Higher preswitch dosing may require higher dose conversion ratios. Dose reduction postswitch risks undertreatment and may not be always appropriate.

[Tumor-associated pain]

Tumor-associated pain has a high prevalence and is still a challenging aspect of pain medicine. Treatment-related etiologies often coexist with pain caused by the oncological disease itself. For cancer pain as well, a pathophysiologically oriented analysis of nociceptive, nociplastic and neuropathic pain is advisable for planning a tailored treatment. The analgesic three-step ladder of the World Health Organization (WHO) should be customized in this context, incorporating antineuropathic or antihypersensitizing pharmacological approaches as well as minimally invasive techniques. Psycho-oncological and exercise therapy interventions should be considered. In cases of long-term courses of treatment or following curative oncological treatment, chronically persistent or chronic tumor-associated pain can occur, necessitating multimodal therapeutic approaches analogue to noncancer pain conditions. Close integration with palliative medicine enhances the therapeutic effectiveness during the transition from nonpalliative to palliative treatment phases.

Fentanyl in cancer pain management: avoiding hasty judgments and discerning its potential benefits

Cancer pain is an important challenge in treatment and requires a rapid onset of action for its control. In particular, breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) should be adequately controlled with a stable dose of a short-acting oral opioid. Fentanyl is a synthetic, highly selective opioid with many advantageous chemical properties, including high lipophilicity and distinct pharmacokinetic properties. It is recommended for pain management in a variety of settings, including acute pain, chronic pain and BTcP. To date, its variously designed formulations allow non-invasive administration; amongst others, sublingual fentanyl has proven useful in the management of BTcP and in improving the quality of life of patients with cancer. This review provides an update on the management of BTcP with fentanyl, with consideration of safety, as it remains an important tool in the treatment of cancer pain.

Antitumor Effects of Hydromorphone on Human Gastric Cancer Cells in vitro

Introduction

Experimental data indicate that morphine and fentanyl may have antitumor effects in gastric cancer cells (GC). Hydromorphone, as an analgesic, is used against refractory cancer pain in recent years. However, the data on hydromorphone influencing the biological characteristics of human gastric cancer cells are lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate how hydromorphone affected the growth of human gastric cancer in vitro.

Material and Methods

Human GC cell lines (HGC-27, MGC-803, AGS and SGC-7901) and human gastric epithelial cells GSE-1 were exposed to various concentrations of hydromorphone (0-800μM). The cell viability, invasion and migration abilities were measured using cell counting kit-8, Transwell and wound healing assays. Apoptosis and cell cycle were evaluated by flow cytometry.

Results

Hydromorphone was toxic in GSE-1 cells at the concentration 800μM. It showed enhanced antitumor effects at a longer incubation time and higher concentrations in HGC-27, MGC-803, AGS and SGC-7901 cells. Hydromorphone inhibited the progression of MGC- 803 cells by cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induction.

Conclusion

Hydromorphone suppresses the proliferation of human GC cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner. That may provide a theoretical basis for the clinical application of hydromorphone in the safe and effective treatment of GC.

Opioid Rotation and Conversion Ratios Used by Palliative Care Professionals: An International Survey

Background: The opioid rotation ratios (ORRs) and conversion ratios (CRs) used worldwide among palliative care (PC) professionals to perform opioid rotations (ORs) and route conversions may have a wide variation. Methods: We surveyed PC professionals on opioid ratios used through email to the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer's PC study group and Twitter and Facebook posts between September and November 2020. Results: We received 370 responses from respondents from 53 countries: 276 (76%) were physicians, 46 (13%) advanced practice providers, 39 (11%) pharmacists, and 9 respondents did not report their profession. There were statistically significant variations in median CR from intravenous (IV) to oral morphine (2-3), IV to oral hydromorphone (2-4.5), ORR from IV hydromorphone to oral morphine (10-20), and ORR from transdermal fentanyl mcg/hour to oral morphine (2-3.5) across various groups. Conclusion: This survey highlights the wide variation in ORRs and CRs among PC clinicians worldwide and the need for further research to standardize practice.

The Role of Pharmacogenomics in Opioid Prescribing

Pharmacogenomics is increasingly important to guide objective, safe, and effective individualised prescribing. Personalised prescribing has revolutionised treatments in the past decade, allowing clinicians to maximise drug efficacy and minimise adverse effects based on a person’s genetic profile. Opioids, the gold standard for cancer pain relief, are among the commonest medications prescribed in palliative care practice. This narrative review examines the literature surrounding opioid pharmacogenomics and its applicability to the palliative care cancer population. There is currently limited intersection between the fields of palliative care and pharmacogenomics, but growing evidence presents a need to build linkages between the two disciplines. Pharmacogenomic evidence guiding opioid prescribing is currently available for codeine and tramadol, which relates to CYP2D6 gene variants. However, these medications are prescribed less commonly for pain in palliative care. Research is accelerating with other opioids, where oxycodone (CYP2D6) and methadone (CYP2B6, ABCB1) already have moderate evidence of an association in terms of drug metabolism and downstream analgesic response and side effects. OPRM1 and COMT are receiving increasing attention and have implications for all opioids, with changes in opioid dosage requirements observed but they have not yet been studied widely enough to be considered clinically actionable. Current evidence indicates that incorporation of pharmacogenomic testing into opioid prescribing practice should focus on the CYP2D6 gene and its actionable variants. Although opioid pharmacogenomic tests are not widely used in clinical practice, the progressively reducing costs and rapid turnover means greater accessibility and affordability to patients, and thus, clinicians will be increasingly asked to provide guidance in this area. The upsurge in pharmacogenomic research will likely discover more actionable gene variants to expand international guidelines to impact opioid prescribing. This rapidly expanding area requires consideration and monitoring by clinicians in order for key findings with clinical implications to be accessible, meaningfully interpretable and communicated.

Experience of symptom control, anxiety and associating factors in a palliative care unit evaluated with Support Team Assessment Schedule Japanese version

Various physical and psychosocial difficulties including anxiety affect cancer patients. Patient surroundings also have psychological effects on caregiving. Assessing the current status of palliative care intervention, specifically examining anxiety and its associated factors, is important to improve palliative care unit (PCU) patient quality of life (QOL). This study retrospectively assessed 199 patients admitted to a PCU during August 2018–June 2019. Data for symptom control, anxiety level, disease insight, and communication level obtained using Support Team Assessment Schedule Japanese version (STAS-J) were evaluated on admission and after 2 weeks. Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI) and laboratory data were collected at admission. Patient anxiety was significantly severer and more frequent in groups with severer functional impairment (p = 0.003) and those requiring symptom control (p = 0.006). Nevertheless, no relation was found between dyspnea and anxiety (p = 0.135). Patients with edema more frequently experienced anxiety (p = 0.068). Patient survival was significantly shorter when family anxiety was higher after 2 weeks (p = 0.021). Symptoms, edema, and disabilities in daily living correlate with patient anxiety. Dyspnea is associated with anxiety, but its emergence might be attributable mainly to physical factors in this population. Family members might sensitize changes reflecting worsened general conditions earlier than the patients.

Clinical Implications of Opioid Therapy

Although opioids are potent central acting broad-spectrum analgesics, their effectiveness is diminished by various factors pertaining to their metabolism, drug interactions, genetic issues, adverse/side effects, and potential for abuse. All these factors present potential barriers to effective analgesia requiring specific considerations in clinical practice, which include monitoring and case-based intervention.

Evaluation of Buprenorphine Rotation in Patients Receiving Long-term Opioids for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE

Individuals with chronic pain who use long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) are at risk of opioid use disorder and other harmful outcomes. Rotation to buprenorphine may be considered, but the outcomes of such rotation in this population have not been systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize the evidence on rotation to buprenorphine from full μ-opioid receptor agonists among individuals with chronic pain who were receiving LTOT, including the outcomes of precipitated opioid withdrawal, pain intensity, pain interference, treatment success, adverse events or adverse effects, mental health condition, and health care use.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycInfo were searched from inception through November 3, 2020, for peer-reviewed original English-language research that reported the prespecified outcomes of rotation from prescribed long-term opioids to buprenorphine among individuals with chronic pain. Two independent reviewers extracted data as well as assessed risk of bias and study quality according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Quality of evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

FINDINGS

A total of 22 studies were analyzed, of which 5 (22.7%) were randomized clinical trials, 7 (31.8%) were case-control or cohort studies, and 10 (45.5%) were uncontrolled pre-post studies, which involved 1616 unique participants (675 female [41.8%] and 941 male [58.2%] individuals). Six of the 22 studies (27.3%) were primary or secondary analyses of a large randomized clinical trial. Participants had diverse pain and opioid use histories. Rationale for buprenorphine rotation included inadequate analgesia, intolerable adverse effects, risky opioid regimens (eg, high dose and/or sedative coprescriptions), and aberrant opioid use. Most protocols were adapted from protocols for initiating treatment in patients with opioid use disorder and used buccal or sublingual buprenorphine. Very low-quality evidence suggested that buprenorphine rotation was associated with maintained or improved analgesia, with a low risk of precipitating opioid withdrawal. Steady-dose buprenorphine was better tolerated than tapered-dose buprenorphine. Adverse effects were manageable, and severe adverse events were rare. Only 2 studies evaluated mental health outcomes, but none evaluated health care use. Limitations included a high risk of bias in most studies.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this systematic review, buprenorphine was associated with reduced chronic pain intensity without precipitating opioid withdrawal in individuals with chronic pain who were receiving LTOT. Future studies are necessary to ascertain the ideal starting dose, formulation, and administration frequency of buprenorphine as well as the best approach to buprenorphine rotation.

Morphine Deteriorates Cisplatin-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Rats and Induces Dose-Dependent Cisplatin Chemoresistance in MCF-7 Human Breast Cancer Cells

Morphine (MOR) is a strong analgesic that is often used in treatment of severe pains during cancer treatment, and thus might be concomitantly used with anticancer drugs as cisplatin (CP). The aim of the current study was to investigate the mechanisms by which MOR can affect CP-induced cardiotoxicity and to explore effects of MOR on the cytotoxic efficacy of CP. MOR (10 mg/kg/day i.p.) was administered to rats for 10 days, with or without 7.5 mg/kg CP single i.p. dose at day 5 of the experiment. In addition, MOR and/or CP were administered to MCF-7 cells to test their cytotoxicity. Compared to control, CP caused cardiotoxic effects manifested by significant increase in serum enzymatic markers; creatine kinase-MB and lactate dehydrogenase, with histopathological cardiac damage. In addition, CP caused cardiac oxidative stress, manifested by significant increased tissue lipid peroxidation product; malondialdehyde and nitric oxide, with significant decrease in tissue antioxidants as reduced glutathione, superoxide dismutase and catalase compared to control. Furthermore, CP significantly increased tissue proinflammatory cytokines; TNF-α and IL-6, as well as upregulated the apoptotic marker; caspase 3 compared to control. MOR/CP combination significantly deteriorated all tested parameters compared to CP alone. In MCF-7 breast cancer cells, administration of MOR in concentrations of 0.1, 1, 10 or 30 μM concomitantly with 1 or 10 μM CP caused dose-dependent reduction in CP-induced cytotoxicity in vitro. In conclusion, MOR administration might deteriorate CP-induced cardiotoxicity during cancer chemotherapy through oxidant, pro-inflammatory and apoptotic mechanisms, and might reduce CP chemotherapeutic efficacy.

Pain Management in Breast Cancer Patients: A Multidisciplinary Approach

Pain is a significant problem and is one of the most invalidating symptoms in breast cancer (BC) patients that would negatively affect the functional status and the Quality of Life (QoL). Pain management in BC patients requires thorough patient evaluation and critical assessment of pain. The actual cause for the pain must be recognized, so management can be tailored to each patient. This review aims to discuss various treatment modalities employed for effectively managing pain in BC patients.

Pharmacotherapy makes up the cornerstone of the management of pain in BC patients. Both opioid and non-opioid analgesics are utilized. The WHO recommends a method called “by the ladder” for managing pain in BC patients where analgesics are used in ascending order. In comprehensive pain management (CPM), non-pharmacologic therapies are gaining wide acceptance and popularity, including complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), procedural and psychosocial interventions. Procedural interventions are usually used in case of severe pain refractory to pharmacological therapy. Techniques, such as radiotherapy, neurectomy, and nerve blocks, are effective in managing cancer pain. However, CAM therapies in BC pain management need to be guided by enough scientific evidence, decision-making, and medical judgment of regulatory bodies.

BC pain management is based on careful routine pain assessments and appropriate patient evaluation both physically and psychologically. Pain control is one of the methods to improve the QoL of BC patients. Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies are accessible to patients today, but they should be used with caution to minimize toxicity and increase effectiveness. The use of any pain management intervention should be based on proper scientific evidence and collective medical judgment.

Continuous subcutaneous infusion for pain control in dying patients: experiences from a tertiary palliative care center

BACKGROUND

Continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) via ambulatory infusion pump (AIP) is a valuable method of pain control in palliative care. When using CSCI, low-dose methadone as add-on to other opioids might be an option in complex pain situations. This study aimed to investigate the effects, and adverse effects, of CSCI for pain control in dying patients, with particular interest in methadone use.

METHODS

This was an observational cohort study. Imminently dying patients with pain, admitted to specialized palliative inpatient wards and introduced on CSCI, were monitored daily by staff for symptoms (Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale - IPOS), sedation (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale - RASS), performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group - ECOG) and delirium (Confusion Assessment Method - CAM).

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients with a median survival of 4 days were included. Of the 47 patients who survived ≥3 days, the proportion of patients with severe/overwhelming pain decreased from 45 to 19% (p < 0.001) after starting CSCI, with only a moderate increase in morphine equivalent daily dose of opioids (MEDD). Alertness was marginally decreased (1 point on the 10-point RASS scale, p = 0.001), whereas performance status and prevalence of delirium, regardless of age, remained unchanged. Both patients with methadone as add-on (MET, n = 13) and patients with only other opioids (NMET, n = 34), improved in pain control (p < 0.05 and 0.001, respectively), despite that MET patients had higher pain scores at baseline (p < 0.05) and were on a higher MEDD (240 mg vs.133 mg). No serious adverse effects demanding treatment stop were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

CSCI via AIP is an effective way to reduce pain in dying patients without increased adverse effects. Add-on methadone may be beneficial in patients with severe complex pain.

Postoperative Pain Management of Non-"Opioid-Naive" Patients Undergoing Hand and Upper-Extremity Surgery

Background: Patients with prior opioid use are often difficult to manage postoperatively. We examined potential strategies for managing these patients: (1) prescribing a different opioid; and (2) encouraging the use of nonopioid analgesics over opioids. Methods: A pain control program was implemented at an outpatient hand and upper-extremity center. Patients were recruited before (n = 305) and after (n = 225) implementation. Seventy of them were taking opioids prior to surgery. Information about pain control satisfaction and opioid use was collected. The Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables with small expected frequencies. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare nonnormally distributed continuous variables. Results: Opioid users used 28.8 ± 25.6 opioid pills; nonopioid users used 14.5 ± 21.5 pills. Furthermore, 41.4% of opioid users sought more pills after surgery compared with 14.0% among nonopioid users. The pain control program was more effective in reducing opioid consumption and waste and increasing nonopioid consumption for nonopioid users than for opioid users. Prior opioid users who were prescribed a different opioid after surgery used 24.6 ± 22.0 opioid pills. Patients prescribed the same opioid used 37.9 ± 30.8 pills. Conclusions: Patients taking opioids prior to hand and upper-extremity surgery use more opioid pills, seek more pills after surgery, and are less satisfied with their pain control than their nonopioid user counterparts. Furthermore, the comprehensive pain plan was less effective in this patient population. Prescribing a different opioid reduced medication requirements for these patients, but additional strategies are needed to address postoperative pain management.

A Practical Approach to Acute Postoperative Pain Management in Chronic Pain Patients

In the United States, more than 100 million people suffer from chronic pain. Among patients presenting for surgery, about one in four have chronic pain. Acute perioperative pain management in this population is challenging because many patients with chronic pain require long-term opioids for the management of this pain, which may result in tolerance, physical dependence, addiction, and opioid-induced hyperalgesia. These challenges are compounded by the ongoing opioid epidemic that has resulted in calls for a reduction in opioid use, with a concurrent increase in the number of patients with chronic opioid exposure presenting for surgery. This article aims to summarize practical considerations for acute postoperative pain management in patients with chronic pain conditions. A patient-centered acute pain management plan, including nonopioid analgesics, regional anesthesia, and careful selection of opioid medications, can lead to adequate analgesia and satisfaction with care. Also, a meticulous rotation from one opioid to another may decrease opioid requirement, increase analgesic effectiveness, and improve satisfaction with care.

Indian Society for Study of Pain, Cancer Pain Special Interest Group Guidelines on Pharmacological Management of Cancer Pain (Part II)

The Indian Society for Study of Pain (ISSP), Cancer Pain Special Interest Group (SIG) guidelines on pharmacological management of cancer pain in adults provide a structured, stepwise approach, which will help to improve the management of cancer pain and to provide the patients with a minimally acceptable quality of life. The guidelines have been developed based on the available literature and evidence, to suit the needs, patient population, and situations in India. A questionnaire, based on the key elements of each sub draft addressing certain inconclusive areas where evidence was lacking, was made available on the ISSP website and circulated by e-mail to all the ISSP and Indian Association of Palliative Care members. We recommend that analgesics for cancer pain management should follow the World Health Organization 3-step analgesic ladder appropriate for the severity of pain. The use of paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs alone or in combination with opioids for mild-to-moderate pain should be used. For mild-to-moderate pain, weak opioids such as tramadol, tapentadol, and codeine can be given in combination with nonopioid analgesics. We recommend morphine as the opioid of the first choice for moderate-to-severe cancer pain. Sustained-release formulations can be started 12 hourly, once the effective 24 h dose with immediate-release morphine is established. Opioid switch or rotation should be considered if there is inadequate analgesia or intolerable side effects. For opioid-induced respiratory depression, μ receptor antagonists (e.g. naloxone) must be used promptly. Antidepressants and/or anticonvulsants should be used to treat neuropathic cancer pain, and the dose should be titrated according to the clinical response and side effects. External beam radiotherapy should be offered to all patients with painful metastatic bone pain. There is evidence on use of ketamine in cancer neuropathic pain, but with no beneficial effect, thus, it is not recommended.

Methadone in Cancer Pain

Methadone has been an unique, versatile, cost effective, synthetic opioid utilized in nociceptive as well as neuropathic pain. Pain and palliative care physicians started accepting methadone in treatment of complex pain associated with advanced cancer and neuropathic pain syndromes in which conventional opioids were no longer effective. The challenge is in accepting methadone as a main stream first line opioid, from being considered as a second line replacement/substitution drug all these years. Methadone has a significant role as opioid rotation in refractory cancer pain, especially when started early leading to successful conversion. Advantages of methadone in paediatric patients with advanced cancer were its safety and efficacy as a first-choice opioid, availability as a liquid formulation and its infrequent dose requirements. Methadone is neither recommended nor justified to be used as an anti-cancer drug and its role as an anti-cancer agent is a misconception. Many guidelines were proposed after 2008 to address methadone safety. Most of them emphasized on prevention of cardiac arrhythmia and association of methadone with QTc prolongation rather than address the real issue. Methadone has been established to be safe when used in opioid naïve patients with careful titration instituted in an ambulatory setting and has equal success in opioid rotation in outpatient setup. Methadone prescription should be carried out by experienced pain and palliative care providers with careful dose titration and clinical monitoring.