Methotrexate-associated toxicity in children with Down syndrome and acute lymphoblastic leukemia during consolidation therapy with high dose methotrexate according to ALL-BFM treatment regimen

Spinal Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumor in a 14-Year-old Child With Down Syndrome: A Case Report

Individuals with 21 trisomy or Down syndrome (DS) are known to have an increased risk of acute leukemia, while they rarely develop solid or central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) is a highly aggressive CNS-WHO grade 4 neoplasm, which has never been reported in association with Down syndrome. We present a case study of a 14-year-old female with Down syndrome, diagnosed with intradural-extramedullary spinal ATRT. The chief complaints included bilateral lower limb weakness, constipation, and urinary incontinence for 2 weeks. Surgery was scheduled, and a biopsy was taken. The histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular analysis confirmed the diagnosis of the ATRT-MYC/group 2B subgroup. This report highlights the challenges of managing a patient with complex medical conditions. Moreover, it adds to the existing literature on CNS tumors in patients with Down syndrome.

Down syndrome-associated leukaemias: current evidence and challenges

Children with Down syndrome (DS) are at increased risk of developing haematological malignancies, in particular acute megakaryoblastic leukaemia and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. The microenvironment established by abnormal haematopoiesis driven by trisomy 21 is compounded by additional genetic and epigenetic changes that can drive leukaemogenesis in patients with DS. GATA-binding protein 1 (GATA1) somatic mutations are implicated in the development of transient abnormal myelopoiesis and the progression to myeloid leukaemia of DS (ML-DS) and provide a model of the multi-step process of leukaemogenesis in DS. This review summarises key genetic drivers for the development of leukaemia in patients with DS, the biology and treatment of ML-DS and DS-associated acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, late effects of treatments for DS-leukaemias and the focus for future targeted therapy.

High-throughput screening as a drug repurposing strategy for poor outcome subgroups of pediatric B-cell precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Although a great cure rate has been achieved for pediatric BCP-ALL, approximately 15% of patients do not respond to conventional chemotherapy and experience disease relapse. A major effort to improve the cure rates by treatment intensification would result in an undesirable increase in treatment-related toxicity and mortality, raising the need to identify novel therapeutic approaches. High-throughput (HTP) drug screening enables the profiling of patients' responses in vitro and allows the repurposing of compounds currently used for other diseases, which can be immediately available for clinical application. The aim of this study was to apply HTP drug screening to identify potentially effective compounds for the treatment of pediatric BCP-ALL patients with poor prognosis, such as patients with Down Syndrome (DS) or carrying rearrangements involving PAX5 or KMT2A/MLL genes. Patient-derived Xenografts (PDX) samples from 34 BCP-ALL patients (9 DS CRLF2r, 15 PAX5r, 10 MLLr), 7 human BCP-ALL cell lines and 14 hematopoietic healthy donor samples were screened on a semi-automated HTP drug screening platform using a 174 compound library (FDA/EMA-approved or in preclinical studies). We identified 9 compounds active against BCP-ALL (ABT-199/venetoclax, AUY922/luminespib, dexamethasone, EC144, JQ1, NVP-HSP990, paclitaxel, PF-04929113 and vincristine), but sparing normal cells. Ex vivo validations confirmed that the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax exerts an anti-leukemic effect against all three ALL subgroups at nanomolar concentrations. Overall, this study points out the benefit of HTP screening application for drug repurposing to allow the identification of effective and clinically translatable therapeutic agents for difficult-to-treat childhood BCP-ALL subgroups.

Management of Down Syndrome-Associated Leukemias: A Review

Importance

Down syndrome (DS), caused by an extra copy of material from chromosome 21, is one of the most common genetic conditions. The increased risk of acute leukemia in DS (DS-AL) has been recognized for decades, consisting of an approximately 150-fold higher risk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) before age 4 years, and a 10- to 20-fold higher risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), compared with children without DS.

Observations

A recent National Institutes of Health-sponsored conference, ImpacT21, reviewed research and clinical trials in children, adolescents, and young adults (AYAs) with DS-AL and are presented herein, including presentation and treatment, clinical trial design, and ethical considerations for this unique population. Between 10% to 30% of infants with DS are diagnosed with transient abnormal myelopoiesis (TAM), which spontaneously regresses. After a latency period of up to 4 years, 20% to 30% develop myeloid leukemia associated with DS (ML-DS). Recent studies have characterized somatic mutations associated with progression from TAM to ML-DS, but predicting which patients will progress to ML-DS remains elusive. Clinical trials for DS-AL have aimed to reduce treatment-related mortality (TRM) and improve survival. Children with ML-DS have better outcomes compared with non-DS AML, but outcomes remain dismal in relapse. In contrast, patients with DS-ALL have inferior outcomes compared with those without DS, due to both higher TRM and relapse. Management of relapsed leukemia poses unique challenges owing to disease biology and increased vulnerability to toxic effects. Late effects in survivors of DS-AL are an important area in need of further study because they may demonstrate unique patterns in the setting of chronic medical conditions associated with DS.

Conclusions and Relevance

Optimal management of DS-AL requires specific molecular testing, meticulous supportive care, and tailored therapy to reduce TRM while optimizing survival. There is no standard approach to treatment of relapsed disease. Future work should include identification of biomarkers predictive of toxic effects; enhanced clinical and scientific collaborations; promotion of access to novel agents through innovative clinical trial design; and dedicated studies of late effects of treatment.

Genetic Predisposition to Hematologic Malignancies in Childhood and Adolescence

Advances in molecular biology and genetic testing have greatly improved our understanding of the genetic basis of hematologic malignancies and have enabled the identification of new cancer predisposition syndromes. Recognizing a germline mutation in a patient affected by a hematologic malignancy allows for a tailored treatment approach to minimize toxicities. It informs the donor selection, the timing, and the conditioning strategy for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, as well as the comorbidities evaluation and surveillance strategies. This review provides an overview of germline mutations that predispose to hematologic malignancies, focusing on those most common during childhood and adolescence, based on the new International Consensus Classification of Myeloid and Lymphoid Neoplasms.

Diagnostic Strategies and Algorithms for Investigating Cancer Predisposition Syndromes in Children Presenting with Malignancy

Simple Summary

Here we provide an overview of several genetically determined conditions that predispose to the development of solid and hematologic malignancies in children. Diagnosing these conditions, whose prevalence is estimated around 10% in children with cancer, is useful to warrant personalized oncologic treatment and follow-up, as well as psychological and genetic counseling to these children and their families. We reviewed the most recent studies focusing on the prevalence of cancer predisposition syndromes in cancer-bearing children and the most-used clinical screening tools. Our work highlighted the value of clinical screening tools in the management of young cancer patients, especially in settings where genetic testing is not promptly accessible.

Abstract

In the past recent years, the expanding use of next-generation sequencing has led to the discovery of new cancer predisposition syndromes (CPSs), which are now known to be responsible for up to 10% of childhood cancers. As knowledge in the field is in constant evolution, except for a few “classic” CPSs, there is no consensus about when and how to perform germline genetic diagnostic studies in cancer-bearing children. Several clinical screening tools have been proposed to help identify the patients who carry higher risk, with heterogeneous strategies and results. After introducing the main clinical and molecular features of several CPSs predisposing to solid and hematological malignancies, we compare the available clinical evidence on CPS prevalence in pediatric cancer patients and on the most used decision-support tools in identifying the patients who could benefit from genetic counseling and/or direct genetic testing. This analysis highlighted that a personalized stepwise approach employing clinical screening tools followed by sequencing in high-risk patients might be a reasonable and cost-effective strategy in the care of children with cancer.

Suspicions regarding the genetic inheritance of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in patients with down syndrome

Children with Down syndrome (DS) are at markedly increased risk for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). DS is caused by trisomy of chromosome 21 affecting approximately 1 in 732 newborns in the USA. ALL is the most common cancer in children and constitutes approximately 25% of cancer diagnoses among children under the age of 15. Different protocols for treatment and management of paediatric ALL are available; however, DS children with ALL (DS-ALL) have increased risk of therapy-related toxicity compared to those without DS. Herein, we summarize the available literature on inherited predisposition for ALL, and possibilities for molecular therapy and treatment for DS-ALL patients.

Risks of late mortality and morbidity among survivors of childhood acute leukemia with Down syndrome: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Children with leukemia and Down syndrome (DS) are at higher risk of acute treatment toxicities than those without DS. Whether late toxicity risks are also elevated is unknown.

METHODS

The authors identified all patients diagnosed with leukemia before the age of 18 years in Ontario, Canada between 1987 and 2013 and who survived greater than 5 years since their last pediatric cancer event. Survivors were divided into those with and without DS, matched by birth year, sex, leukemia type, and receipt of radiation. DS survivors were matched to individuals with DS without childhood cancer (DS controls) in a 1:10 ratio. Outcomes were identified through linkage to population-based health services databases.

RESULTS

DS survivors (n = 79) experienced inferior overall survival compared to non-DS survivors (n = 231) (20-year overall survival, 81.7% ± 6.8% vs 98.3% ± 1.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 12.8; P < .0001) and to DS controls (n = 790; 96.3% ± 1.2%; HR, 5.4 P < .0001). Pulmonary and infectious deaths were noted among DS survivors. There was no difference in the incidence of congestive heart failure between DS survivors and either control cohort, nor of hearing loss or dementia between DS survivors and DS controls.

CONCLUSIONS

DS survivors were at substantially higher risk of late mortality than non-DS survivors or DS controls. This excess risk was not attributable to cardiac- or subsequent malignant neoplasm-related late effects, historically main causes of premature death among non-DS survivors. Chronic morbidities associated with DS were not increased compared to DS controls. DS-specific surveillance guidelines may be warranted.

The Clinical Spectrum of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Associated With Specific Genetic Syndromes: Two Novel Pediatric Cases and a Systematic Review

Background and Aims: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a typical polygenic disorder and less frequently shows a monogenic origin. Furthermore, IBD can originate in the context of specific genetic syndromes associated with a risk of autoimmune disorders. We aimed to systematically evaluate the prevalence of IBD in specific genetic syndromes and to review the clinical characteristics of the published cases. Methods: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, studies describing patients with IBD and a genetic syndrome and/or studies indicating the prevalence or incidence of IBD in subjects with a genetic syndrome were included. Results: Forty-six studies describing a total of 67 cases of IBD in six genetic syndromes and two personally assessed unpublished cases were included in the review. The majority of cases were associated with Turner syndrome (TS) (38 cases), Down syndrome (DS) (18 cases) and neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) (8 cases). Sporadic cases were described in DiGeorge syndrome (2), Kabuki syndrome (2), and Williams syndrome (1). The prevalence of IBD ranged from 0.67 to 4% in TS and from 0.2 to 1.57% in DS. The incidence of IBD was increased in TS and DS compared to the general population. Eight cases of IBD in TS had a severe/lethal course, many of which described before the year 2000. Two IBD cases in DS were particularly severe. Conclusion: Evidence of a greater prevalence of IBD is accumulating in TS, DS, and NF1. Management of IBD in patients with these genetic conditions should consider the presence of comorbidities and possible drug toxicities. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021249820.

The Down syndrome-associated arthritis Cohort in the new Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry: Clinical Characteristics, Treatment and Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Down syndrome-associated arthritis (DA) is under-recognized and current therapies used for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) appear to be poorly tolerated, and less effective in patients with DA. The objective of this study was to characterize clinical manifestations and therapeutic preferences in DA compared to JIA, using the new Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry (nCARRA).

METHODS

In a case-control study, between the dates of July 2015 and March 2019, patients with a diagnosis of JIA and Down syndrome (DS) were identified and matched on age, sex, and JIA subtype to patients with JIA and without DS. Collected data included demographics, disease characteristics, laboratory results, treatment exposure, and outcome measures.

RESULTS

Thirty-six children with DA and 165 with JIA were identified. Most patients had polyarticular RF negative presentation. At entry into the nCARRA, there were minimal differences between groups, and at last visit there were significant (p-value < 0.05) differences for multiple outcome measures. Those with DA and JIA had similar therapeutic exposure to DMARDs and biologics, but those with DA had more DMARD adverse events (93% versus 25%) and biologic therapy ineffectiveness (60% versus 17%).

CONCLUSIONS

There was little difference between patients with DA and JIA at baseline and similar therapy was implemented for those in the nCARRA, however, at the last visit those with DA had more disease burden. Additionally, there were more DMARD adverse events and biologic ineffectiveness for those with DA. More research is needed to determine differences in pathophysiology and optimal therapeutic approaches.

Gain of chromosome 21 in hematological malignancies: lessons from studying leukemia in children with Down syndrome

Structural and numerical alterations of chromosome 21 are extremely common in hematological malignancies. While the functional impact of chimeric transcripts from fused chromosome 21 genes such as TEL-AML1, AML1-ETO, or FUS-ERG have been extensively studied, the role of gain of chromosome 21 remains largely unknown. Gain of chromosome 21 is a frequently occurring aberration in several types of acute leukemia and can be found in up to 35% of cases. Children with Down syndrome (DS), who harbor constitutive trisomy 21, highlight the link between gain of chromosome 21 and leukemogenesis, with an increased risk of developing acute leukemia compared with other children. Clinical outcomes for DS-associated leukemia have improved over the years through the development of uniform treatment protocols facilitated by international cooperative groups. The genetic landscape has also recently been characterized, providing an insight into the molecular pathogenesis underlying DS-associated leukemia. These studies emphasize the key role of trisomy 21 in priming a developmental stage and cellular context susceptible to transformation, and have unveiled its cooperative function with additional genetic events that occur during leukemia progression. Here, using DS-leukemia as a paradigm, we aim to integrate our current understanding of the role of trisomy 21, of critical dosage-sensitive chromosome 21 genes, and of associated mechanisms underlying the development of hematological malignancies. This review will pave the way for future investigations on the broad impact of gain of chromosome 21 in hematological cancer, with a view to discovering new vulnerabilities and develop novel targeted therapies to improve long term outcomes for DS and non-DS patients.

Treatment outcomes in children with Acute lymphoblastic leukemia with versus without coexisting Down's syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Down syndrome (DS) also known as Trisomy 21, is a chromosomal disorder affecting approximately 1 in 732newborns annually in the United States. Children with DS are more likely to develop acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). For the management of pediatric ALL, different treatment protocols have been set up since years. However, ALL children with coexisting DS have shown to have increased therapy-related toxicities compared to those without DS. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to systematically analyze the treatment outcomes in acute ALL children with versus without coexisting DS.

METHODS

Electronic databases including the Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, MEDLINE, http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google scholar were searched for publications reporting treatment related outcomes in ALL children with versus without co-existing DS. Several treatment protocols were used accordingly. This study had a long-term follow-up time period ranging from 5 to 10 years. The RevMan 5.3 software was used to carry out this analysis. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the results post analysis.

RESULTS

A total number of 31,476 children with ALL enrolled between the years 1981 and 2011 were included. Among the total number of children with ALL, 1303 had coexisting DS. Our results showed that event-free survival was similar in ALL children with versus without DS (odds ratio [OR]: 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-3.50; P = .55). Overall mortality (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 0.86-3.10; P = .13) and participants who achieved clinical remission (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.12-9.29; P = .97) were also similarly manifested. However, treatment-related mortality (OR: 4.29, 95% CI: 2.90-6.36; P = .00001) and induction failure (OR: 2.77, 95% CI: 1.08-7.07; P = .03) were significantly higher in the DS group. Also, total (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.02-1.88; P = .04) and bone marrow relapses (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.00-1.67; P = .05) were significantly higher in ALL children with DS. Nevertheless, central nervous system relapse (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.60-2.20; P = .67), testicular relapse (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.38-1.85; P = .87), and other relapses (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.27-4.62; P = .88) were not significantly different when these outcomes were separately analyzed.

CONCLUSION

Based on this analysis of the treatment outcomes in ALL children with versus without DS, event-free survival, overall mortality, and patients who achieved clinical remission were similar during this long-term follow-up time period. However, due to the significantly higher treatment-related mortality, induction failure, and certain relapses in ALL children with DS, new guidelines might have to focus on reconsidering or modifying treatment regimens for ALL children with DS.