Early progression of disease predicts shorter survival in MALT lymphoma patients receiving systemic treatment

Effect of POD24 on the prognosis of follicular and other indolent B-cell non-hodgkin lymphomas

Indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas(B-NHL) encompass a heterogeneous category of lymphomas characterized by a wide range of pathological subtypes. With the application of chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab (R-chemo), the prognosis of patients has improved considerably, with a 10-year survival rate of 60-80%. Despite these advancements, a significant number of patients still experience disease progression during or shortly after initial treatment. Those who progress within the first 24 months (POD24) continue to face a notably worse prognosis. This study aims to explore the significance of POD24 in predicting the prognosis of different subtypes of indolent B-cell NHL through a comprehensive literature review. The investigation extends to examining the existing prognostic assessment tools and evaluating the interrelationship between POD24 and these tools. By synthesizing relevant research findings, this study seeks to contribute to the current understanding of the role POD24 plays in prognostic evaluation and its potential implications in guiding clinical decision-making for patients with indolent B-cell NHL.

Recent updates in the indolent lymphomas: Update on marginal zone lymphoma and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia

Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL) and Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM) are indolent lymphomas that both arise from post germinal center lymphocytes. Both can secrete a monoclonal protein but high levels are mostly only seen in WM. The MYD88 L256P somatic mutation that is present in an estimated 95% of patients with WM has helped greatly in differentiating the two lymphomas. Several large clinical studies with new drugs have been performed that have provided new treatment options for both MZL and WM patients. In this short review we will discuss the recent literature published and provide some recommendations.

Characteristics, efficacy, and prognosis analysis of newly diagnosed marginal zone lymphoma

Objective

To retrospectively analyze the characteristics of newly diagnosed marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) patients, evaluate the efficacy of different treatment regimens, and explore prognostic factors in the era of immunotherapy.

Methods

We reviewed the clinical data of newly diagnosed MZL patients treated at the Department of Hematology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, from October 2013 to October 2023. Survival differences between groups were analyzed using the log-rank test, and prognostic factors were identified.

Results

A total of 265 newly diagnosed MZL patients were included, with a median age of 59 years (range 22-90). The most common pathological type was mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, accounting for 66.0% of cases. Among the 147 MZL patients included in the efficacy analysis, the median follow-up was 43.4 months. Both the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The 5-year PFS and OS rates were 76.0% and 86.6%, respectively. Patients who achieved complete response (CR) after induction therapy had significantly better PFS (P=0.0045), OS (P<0.001), and time to next treatment (TTNT) (P=0.0045) compared to those who did not achieve CR. A subgroup analysis was conducted on 51 MZL patients with high tumor burden who received ≥4 cycles of treatment. It was found that the CR rate (CRR) in patients receiving obinutuzumab (G) ± chemotherapy was significantly higher than in those receiving rituximab (R) ± chemotherapy (93.8% vs. 48.6%, P=0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed that disease progression or death within 24 months of initial treatment (POD24) was an independent risk factor affecting OS (P<0.001). Patients who experienced POD24 had a median survival of only 19.7 months, with a 3-year OS rate of just 37.6%, whereas those without POD24 had a 3-year OS rate of 97.3%.

Conclusion

MZL is predominantly seen in middle-aged and elderly patients and is a specific indolent B-cell lymphoma, with MALT lymphoma being the most common subtype. Achieving CR after induction therapy significantly prolongs survival in MZL patients. Compared to R ± chemotherapy, G ± chemotherapy achieves a higher CRR in high tumor burden MZL patients. In the era of immunotherapy, POD24 is an independent prognostic factor for MZL.

IELSG38: phase II trial of front-line chlorambucil plus subcutaneous rituximab induction and maintenance in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma

The IELSG38 trial was conducted to investigate the effects of subcutaneous (SC) rituximab on the complete remission (CR) rate and the benefits of SC rituximab maintenance in patients with extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) who received front-line treatment with chlorambucil plus rituximab. Study treatment was an induction phase with oral chlorambucil 6 mg/m2/day on weeks 1-6, 9-10, 13-14, 17-18, and 21-22, and intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 of weeks 1-4, and 1,400 mg SC on weeks 9, 13, 17, and 21. Then, a maintenance phase followed with rituximab administered at 1,400 mg SC every two months for two years. Of the 112 patients enrolled, 109 were evaluated for efficacy. The CR rates increased from 52% at the end of the induction phase to 70% upon completion of the maintenance phase. With a median follow-up of 5.8 years, the 5-year event-free, progression-free, and overall survival rates were 87% (95% CI: 78-92), 84% (95% CI: 75-89), and 93% (95% CI: 86-96), respectively. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities were neutropenia (33%) and lymphocytopenia (16%). Six patients experienced treatment-related serious adverse events, including fever of unknown origin, sepsis, pneumonia, respiratory failure, severe cerebellar ataxia, and fatal acute myeloid leukemia. The trial showed that SC rituximab did not improve the CR rate at the conclusion of the induction phase, which was the main endpoint. Nevertheless, SC rituximab maintenance might have facilitated long-term disease control, potentially contributing to enhanced event-free and progression-free survival.

What clinicians should know about surrogate end points in hematologic malignancies

ABSTRACT

Use of surrogates as primary end points is commonplace in hematology/oncology clinical trials. As opposed to prognostic markers, surrogates are end points that can be measured early and yet can still capture the full effect of treatment, because it would be captured by the true outcome (eg, overall survival). We discuss the level of evidence of the most commonly used end points in hematology and share recommendations on how to apply and evaluate surrogate end points in research and clinical practice. Based on the statistical literature, this clinician-friendly review intends to build a bridge between clinicians and surrogacy specialists.

Marginal zone lymphoma international prognostic index: a unifying prognostic index for marginal zone lymphomas requiring systemic treatment

Background

Marginal zone lymphomas (MZL), comprised of three unique but related subtypes, lack a unifying prognostic score applicable to all the patients in need for systemic chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy.

Methods

Patients from the prospective NF10 study (NCT02904577) with newly diagnosed MZL and receiving frontline systemic therapy at diagnosis or after observation were used to train a prognostic model. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) from start of treatment. The model was externally validated in a pooled analysis of two independent cohorts from the University of Iowa and Mayo Clinic Molecular Epidemiology Resource and the University of Miami.

Findings

We identified 501 eligible patients. After multivariable modeling, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) above upper normal limit, hemoglobin <12 g/dL, absolute lymphocyte count <1 × 109/L, platelets <100 × 109/L, and MZL subtype (nodal or disseminated) were independently associated with inferior PFS. The proposed MZL International Prognostic index (MZL-IPI) combined these 5 factors, and we defined low (LRG, 0 factors, 27%), intermediate (IRG, 1-2 factors, 57%) and high (HRG, 3+ factors, 16%) risk groups with 5-y PFS of 85%, 66%, and 37%, respectively (c-Harrell = 0.64). Compared to the LRG, the IRG (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 2.30, 95% CI 1.39-3.80) and HRG (HR = 5.41, 95% CI 3.12-9.38) had inferior PFS. Applying the MZL-IPI to the pooled US cohort (N = 353), 94 (27%), 192 (54%), and 67 (19%) patients were classified as LRG, IRG, and HRG, respectively, and the model was validated for PFS (log-rank test p = 0.0018; c-Harrell = 0.578, 95% CI 0.54-0.62). The MZL-IPI was also prognostic for OS in both the training and the external validation sets.

Interpretation

MZL-IPI is a new prognostic score for use in all patients with MZL considered for systemic treatment.

Funding

The MER was supported by P50 CA97274 and U01 CA195568.

Prognostic value of POD18 combined with improved IELSG in primary central nervous system lymphoma

PURPOSE

The International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IELSG) score is widely used in clinical practice to stratify the risk of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients. Our study aims to confirm and improve the IELSG score in PCNSL patients based on Chinese populations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 79 PCNSL patients were retrospectively analyzed. All patients treated with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based therapy collected clinical data. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off values for the factors in IELSG score. Progression of disease (POD) at the most landmark time point was determine by Epanechnikov kernel and the area under the ROC curve (AUROC). Kaplan-Meier and multivariable regression methods were used to analyze survival data. Nomogram was generated for calculating the weight of each selected factor.

RESULTS

The traditional IELSG score had no significant difference on OS and PFS except ECOG ≥ 2 and could not stratify the risk groups in PCNSL. The improved IELSG scoring system was established, which incorporated age ≥ 54 years, ECOG ≥ 2, deep brain structure, elevated CSF protein, and LDH/ULN > 0.75. On the other hand, POD18 was identified as a new powerful prognostic factor for PCNSL. In multivariate analysis, POD18 and the improved IELSG scoring system were independent prognostic factors for OS. Nomogram including the two significant variables showed the best performance (C-index = 0.828).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the IELSG score was improved and a new prognostic indicator POD18 was incorporated to construct a nomogram prognostic model, thereby further improving the predictive ability of the model.

Early complete response as a validated surrogate marker in extranodal marginal zone lymphoma systemic therapy

ABSTRACT

Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) has a very indolent course, and the validation of surrogate markers could accelerate novel therapies. Although prognostic markers do exist, no surrogate markers have been validated in EMZL. We hypothesized that time to complete response within 24 months (TTCR24) and complete response (CR) at 24 months (CR24) could be valid surrogate markers of progression-free survival (PFS). The International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group 19 phase 3 trial showed the advantage of double therapy (rituximab + chlorambucil) over single therapy (rituximab or chlorambucil) on PFS. We used 2 recently published single-trial approaches to assess whether TTCR24 and CR24 were good surrogate markers of 8-year PFS (8y-PFS). Among the 401 patients, 264 (66%) reached a CR in the first 24 months, of which 222 (84%) remained in CR at month 24. The cumulative incidence of CR over time was significantly higher in patients under double therapy (hazard ratio, 1.75; P < .001). The double therapy arm was associated with a higher CR24 rate, a shorter TTCR24, and a longer 8y-PFS. The estimated proportion of treatment effect on 8y-PFS explained by TTCR24 was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-1.87). CR24 was also a strong surrogate marker because it mediated 90% (95% CI, 0.51-2.22) of the treatment effect on PFS and its natural indirect effect was significant throughout the follow-up. We found that TTCR24 predicted 95% and that CR24 mediated 90% of the treatment effect on long-term PFS. Therefore, TTCR24 and CR24 could be used in clinical trials as informative and valid early indicators of treatment effect on PFS. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00210353.

Marginal zone lymphoma: 2023 update on diagnosis and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Marginal zone lymphomas (MZL) are collectively the second most common type of indolent lymphoma.

DIAGNOSIS

Three subtypes of MZL are recognized: splenic, extranodal, and nodal. The diagnosis is secured following biopsy of an involved nodal or extranodal site demonstrating a clonal B-cell infiltrate with CD5 and CD10 negative immunophenotype most common. Some cases will features IgM paraprotein, but MYD88 L256P mutations are less frequent than in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. Prognostication Several prognostic models have been developed, including the MALT-IPI and the MZL-IPI. The latter is broadly applicable across MZL subtypes and incorporates elevated serum LDH, anemia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia and nodal or disseminated subtypes as independent predictors of outcome.

TREATMENT

We discuss suggested approach to therapy for both early and advanced-stage disease, with reference to chemo-immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and emerging treatments in relapsed/refractory disease such as BTK inhibitors.

Impact of early relapse within 24 months after first-line systemic therapy (POD24) on outcomes in patients with marginal zone lymphoma: A US multisite study

Progression of disease within 24 months (POD24) from diagnosis in marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) was shown to portend poor outcomes in prior studies. However, many patients with MZL do not require immediate therapy, and the time from diagnosis-to-treatment interval can be highly variable with no universal criteria to initiate systemic therapy. Hence, we sought to evaluate the prognostic relevance of early relapse or progression within 24 months from systemic therapy initiation in a large US cohort. The primary objective was to evaluate the overall survival (OS) in the two groups. The secondary objective included the evaluation of factors predictive of POD24 and the assessment of cumulative incidence of histologic transformation (HT) in POD24 versus non-POD24 groups. The study included 524 patients with 143 (27%) in POD24 and 381 (73%) in non-POD24 groups. Patients with POD24 had inferior OS compared to those without POD24, regardless of the type of systemic therapy received (rituximab monotherapy or immunochemotherapy) at diagnosis. After adjusting for factors associated with inferior OS in the univariate Cox model, POD24 remained associated with significantly inferior OS (HR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.53-4.09, p = 0.0003) in multivariable analysis. The presence of monoclonal protein at diagnosis and those who received first-line rituximab monotherapy had higher odds of POD24 on logistic regression analysis. Patients with POD24 had a significantly higher risk for HT compared to those without POD24. POD24 in MZL might be associated with adverse biology and could be used as an additional information point in clinical trials and investigated as a marker for worse prognosis.

Novel targeted drugs for follicular and marginal zone lymphoma: a comprehensive review

Although mostly incurable, indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHL) are chronic diseases with a median overall survival approaching 20 years. In recent years, important advances in the knowledge of the biology of these lymphomas have led to the development of new drugs, mostly chemotherapy-free, with promising outcomes. With a median age of around 70 years at diagnosis, many patients with iNHL suffer from comorbid conditions that may limit treatment options. Therefore, nowadays, in the transition towards personalized medicine, several challenges lie ahead, such as identifying predictive markers for the selection of treatment, the adequate sequencing of available therapies, and the management of new and accumulated toxicities. In this review, we include a perspective on recent therapeutic advances in follicular and marginal zone lymphoma. We describe emerging data on approved and emerging novel therapies, such as targeted therapies (PI3K inhibitors, BTK inhibitors, EZH2 inhibitors), monoclonal antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates. Finally, we describe immune-directed approaches such as combinations with lenalidomide or the even more innovative bispecific T-cell engagers and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, which can achieve a high rate of durable responses with manageable toxicities, further obviating the need for chemotherapy.

Enhancing prognostication and personalizing treatment of extranodal marginal zone lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue is an indolent lymphoma originating from marginal zone B-cells and associated with chronic inflammation. EMZL demonstrates distinct genomic alterations according to the primary extranodal site of disease but commonly affects signaling pathways including NF-ĸB, B-cell receptor, and NOTCH. Treatment with radiation therapy is commonly implemented in localized diseases, and multiple agents are available for patients with advanced-stage diseases in need of therapy. Bendamustine with rituximab is a frontline platform associated with high efficacy.

AREAS COVERED

Clinical features, diagnosis, genomics, models enabling risk stratification, treatment options, and future directions.

EXPERT OPINION

The lack of consistent genotyping profile in EMZL precludes the development of tissue and circulatory biomarkers for the diagnosis, risk stratification, and monitoring of minimal residual disease. Furthermore, the biological heterogeneity observed in extranodal sites associated with overall limited genomic data prevents the testing of druggable pathways aiming for a personalized treatment approach. Future clinical trials should focus on EMZL considering the unique clinical characteristics in the eligibility criteria and response assessment to better inform efficacy of novel agents and delineate sequences of therapies.

Management of marginal zone lymphomas

Marginal zone lymphomas (MZLs) represent about 7% of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas and include 3 different subtypes-namely, extranodal (EMZL), nodal, and splenic (SMZL). The initial assessment requires specific diagnostic and staging procedures depending on organ-related peculiarities. In particular, although positron emission tomography/computed tomography was not initially recommended, recent data have reassessed its role in the routine staging of MZL, especially when only localized treatment is planned or there is a suspicion of histologic transformation. Recent findings have improved the risk stratification of MZL patients, highlighting the association of early progression after frontline therapy with worse overall survival. A significant fraction of MZL cases may be related to specific bacterial (ie, Helicobacter pylori in gastric EMZL) or viral infections (hepatis C virus), and in the earlier phases of disease, a variable percentage of patients may respond to anti-infective therapy. Involved-site radiotherapy has a central role in the management of localized EMZL not amenable to or not responding to anti-infective therapy. Although rituximab-based treatments (bendamustine- rituximab in advanced EMZL or rituximab monotherapy in SMZL) have demonstrated favorable results, the current therapeutic scenario is predicted to rapidly change as emerging novel agents, especially Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have demonstrated promising efficacy and safety profiles, leading to their approval in the relapsed setting. Moreover, a large variety of novel agents (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, bispecific antibodies) are being tested in MZL patients with encouraging preliminary results.

Revised MALT-IPI: A new predictive model that identifies high-risk patients with extranodal marginal zone lymphoma

Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) is a heterogeneous disease with a subset of patients exhibiting a more aggressive course. We previously reported that EMZL with multiple mucosal sites (MMS) at diagnosis is characterized by shorter survival. To better recognize patients with different patterns of progression-free survival (PFS) we developed and validated a new prognostic index primarily based on patient's disease characteristics. We derived the "Revised mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue International Prognostic Index" (Revised MALT-IPI) in a large data set (n = 397) by identifying candidate variables that showed highest prognostic association with PFS. The revised MALT-IPI was validated in two independent cohorts, from the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic (n = 297) and from IELSG-19 study (n = 400). A stepwise Cox regression analysis yielded a model including four independent predictors of shorter PFS. Revised MALT-IPI has scores ranging from 0 to 5, calculated as a sum of one point for each of the following- age >60 years, elevated LDH, and stage III-IV; and two points for MMS. In the training cohort, the Revised MALT-IPI defined four risk groups: low risk (score 0, reference group), low-medium risk (score 1, HR = 1.85, p = .008), medium-high risk (score 2, HR = 3.84, p < .0001), and high risk (score 3+, HR = 8.48, p < .0001). Performance of the Revised MALT-IPI was similar in external validation cohorts. Revised MALT-IPI is a new index centered on disease characteristics that provides robust risk-stratification identifying a group of patients characterized by earlier progression of disease. Revised MALT-IPI can allow a more disease-adjusted management of patients with EMZL in clinical trials and practice.

A roadmap for clinical trial design in marginal zone lymphoma

Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is commonly underrepresented in clinical trials collectively studying mostly nodal indolent lymphomas.In this manuscript we propose new inclusion and response criteria defined by MZL subtype and disease location for those with extranodal MZL. Progression of disease within 24 months is associated with poor outcomes in MZL and future studies should assess the efficacy of novel agents in this population.

Causes of Death in Low Grade B-Cell Lymphomas in the Rituximab Era: A Prospective Cohort Study

Mortality for patients with marginal zone and indolent B-cell lymphoma is largely unrelated to lymphoma in the first decade from diagnosis.

Early progression or retreatment within 24 months of diagnosis is strongly associated with increased risk of lymphoma-related mortality.

Low-grade B-cell lymphomas other than follicular and small lymphocytic lymphoma (LGBCL) account for 10% of all B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Despite improvements in survival outcomes for these patients, little is known about cause of death (COD) in the rituximab era. For a better understanding, we studied 822 newly diagnosed patients with marginal zone, lymphoplasmacytic, and unclassifiable low-grade B-cell lymphoma prospectively enrolled in the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Specialized Program of Research Excellence Molecular Epidemiology Resource from 2002 to 2015. COD was assigned based on medical record review using a standard protocol. At a median follow-up of 107 months, 219 (27%) patients had died. The incidence of lymphoma-related deaths when pooling across subtypes was lower than non–lymphoma-related deaths (10-year incidence, 8.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.2-10.4 vs 13.6%; 95% CI: 11.2-16.6). The incidence of lymphoma-related deaths varied by subtype, ranging from 3.7% at 10 years in extranodal marginal zone lymphoma to 19.3% in lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Patients with early progression or retreatment events, defined using event-free survival at 24 months from diagnosis, had significantly higher likelihood of lymphoma-related death compared with patients without early events (10-year estimate: 19.1% vs 5.1%, respectively; P < .001), whereas the rates for non–lymphoma-related death were comparable in patients with or without early events (10-year estimates: 11.0% vs 15.3%, respectively). In conclusion, the most common COD in LGBCLs in the first decade after diagnosis was for causes other than lymphoma. Progression or retreatment within the first 2 years of diagnosis was a strong predictor for risk of lymphoma-related death.

Management of Extranodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Present and Upcoming Perspectives

Simple Summary

Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma distinguishes itself from other indolent lymphomas due to its unique pathophysiology and natural history. This is reflected in its management, where next to traditional treatment strategies such as observation, radiotherapy or chemotherapy, eradication of the causal agent and even surgery represent important aspects of therapy. This review focuses on the particular aspects of this indolent lymphoma that affect management and summarizes the current evidence and different guidelines.

Abstract

Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) encompasses a subgroup of non-Hodgkin lymphomas that often present with localized involvement and may manifest in a diversity of organs and tissues. EMZL pathogenesis is in some cases linked to chronic inflammation/infection, which may impose additional diagnostic and clinical challenges. The most studied and established connection is the presence of Helicobacter pylori in gastric EMZL. Due to its heterogeneity of presentation and intricate pathological features, treatment can be complex, and staging systems are decisive for the choice of therapy. Nevertheless, there is no consensus regarding the most suitable staging system, and recommendations vary among different countries. As a rule of thumb, in limited stages, a local therapy with surgery or radiation is the preferred option, and it is potentially curative. Of note, eradicating the causal agent may be an important step of treatment, especially in gastric EMZL, in which Helicobacter pylori eradication remains the first-line therapy for the majority of patients. In patients with more advanced stages, watch-and-wait is a valuable option, especially amongst those without clear indications for systemic therapy, and it may be carried on for several years. If watch-and-wait is not an option, systemic therapy may be needed. Even though several agents have been tested as monotherapy or in combination in recent years, there is no consensus regarding the first-line therapy, and decisions can vary depending on individual factors, such as age, clinical performance and stage. This review aims to discuss the several aspects of EMZL, including genetic milieu, pathogenesis and staging systems, that may influence the choice of therapy. In addition, we present a summary of evidence of several systemic therapies, compare different recommendations worldwide and discuss future perspectives and novelties in its therapy.

A novel prognostic nomogram for patients with extragastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma: A multicenter study

Background

The aim of this study was to explore predictors and construct a nomogram for risk stratification in primary extragastric mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma.

Methods

Extragastric MALT lymphoma cases newly diagnosed between November 2010 and April 2020 were assessed to construct a progression‐free survival (PFS)‐related nomogram. We also performed external validation of the nomogram in an independent cohort.

Results

We performed multivariate analyses of 174 patients from 3 hospitals who were included in the training cohort. Stage, hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) status, and Ki67 expression were significantly associated with PFS. These three factors were used to construct a nomogram, which was shown to have a C‐index of 0.89. Two risk groups (low risk and high risk) were identified by the prognostic model. The 5‐year PFS was 98.9% for the low‐risk group and 69.3% for the high‐risk group (p < 0.001). The overall survival (OS) could also be effectively distinguished by the nomogram, resulting in an OS of 100% for the low‐risk group and 94.6% for the high‐risk group (p = 0.01). These results were validated and confirmed in an independent cohort with 165 patients from another three hospitals. The 5‐year PFS rates were 94.8% and 66.7% for the low‐risk and high‐risk groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The 5‐year OS rates were 97.9% and 88.4%, respectively (p = 0.016).

Conclusion

The nomogram could well distinguish the prognosis of low‐ and high‐risk patients with extragastric MALT lymphoma and is thus recommended for clinical use.

An international analysis evaluating frontline bendamustine with rituximab in extranodal marginal zone lymphoma

Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) is a heterogeneous non-Hodgkin lymphoma. No consensus exists regarding the standard-of-care in patients with advanced-stage disease. Current recommendations are largely adapted from follicular lymphoma, for which bendamustine with rituximab (BR) is an established approach. We analyzed the safety and efficacy of frontline BR in EMZL using a large international consortium. We included 237 patients with a median age of 63 years (range, 21-85). Most patients presented with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 1 (n = 228; 96.2%), stage III/IV (n = 179; 75.5%), and intermediate (49.8%) or high (33.3%) Mucosa Associated Lymphoid Tissue International Prognosis Index (MALT-IPI). Patients received a median of 6 (range, 1-8) cycles of BR, and 20.3% (n = 48) received rituximab maintenance. Thirteen percent experienced infectious complications during BR therapy; herpes zoster (4%) was the most common. Overall response rate was 93.2% with 81% complete responses. Estimated 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 80.5% (95% CI, 73.1% to 86%) and 89.6% (95% CI, 83.1% to 93.6%), respectively. MALT-IPI failed to predict outcomes. In the multivariable model, the presence of B symptoms was associated with shorter PFS. Rituximab maintenance was associated with longer PFS (hazard ratio = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.71; P = .016) but did not impact OS. BR is a highly effective upfront regimen in EMZL, providing durable remissions and overcoming known adverse prognosis factors. This regimen is associated with occurrence of herpes zoster; thus, prophylactic treatment may be considered.

Does early disease progression predicts survival after first line-treatment of Waldenström macroglobulinemia?

In symptomatic Waldenström macroglobulinemia (sWM) patients, prognosis is assessed with the international prognostic scoring system (IPSSWM). In follicular lymphoma and other B‐cell and T‐cell lymphomas, disease progression within 24 months (POD24) or (in patients without POD24) after 24 months has been proposed as the start date for stratifying subsequent survival. In the present report, we assessed in a large series of 472 sWM patients, the prognostic value of this new dynamic endpoint already reported in many other lymphomas subtypes. The 3 year subsequent survival for patients with POD24 was 75% and 93% for patients without POD24. In sWM patients, departure from the proportional hazards assumption complicated this analysis. In patients without POD24, the median subsequent progression‐free survival time of 43 months accounted for favorable outcome, whereas survival after progression was not influenced by the time to progression. In addition, sensitivity analysis showed that the baseline IPSSWM score also influenced survival after POD24. In sWM patients, we conclude that the apparent difference in survival after POD24 or the 24 months time‐point (in patients without POD24) is mainly explained by the prolonged subsequent progression free survival of latter patients. Indeed, the mortality after progression is not influenced by the time to this event.

The evidence to date on umbralisib for the treatment of refractory marginal zone lymphoma and follicular lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Between 2014 and 2018 The United States Food and Drug Administration granted approvals for three small molecule inhibitors of phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) as monotherapy for follicular lymphoma relapsed after at least 2 prior therapies. Idelalisib, copanlisib, and duvelisib each showed similar overall response rate and progression-free survival efficacy along with significant toxicity in separate phase II single-arm studies. Umbralisib, as the 4^th iteration in this PI3K-inhibitor class for relapsed/refractory indolent B-cell lymphoma (iB-NHL), appears comparably active but may have improved tolerability.

AREAS COVERED

We review the use and limitations of PI3K-inhibitors for iB-NHL and discuss the development of and clinical results for umbralisib. Efficacy data are contextualized alongside other PI3K-inihibitors within the limitations of published single-arm studies. We compare and contrast available safety data, covering the off-target inhibition by umbralisib of casein kinase 1ε that is thought to contribute to a more favorable immune-mediated toxicity profile.

EXPERT OPINION

Though a late-comer to the PI3K-inihibitor party in iB-NHL, umbralisib may carve out an important role in treatment algorithms. Umbralisib's apparently superior safety needs to be confirmed in real-world and, ideally, comparative studies but stands to make it an attractive option in patients who are frail and/or seek treatments more compatible with remote management.

Prognostic significance of serum immunoglobulin paraprotein in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma

To assess the prognostic significance of immunoglobulin (Ig) paraproteinaemia in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, 218 patients diagnosed with MALT lymphoma were enrolled in this study. Serum Ig paraprotein was detected in 42 of 218 patients (19.3%), mostly IgM-K (15, 35.7%), followed by IgM-L and IgG-L. Advanced age (p = 0.025), poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (p = 0.014), bone marrow involvement (p = 0.019), B symptoms (p = 0.039), advanced disease stage (III-IV) (p < 0.0001), elevated serum β2-microglobulin level (p < 0.0001), multiple extranodal sites of involvement (p < 0.0001), nodal involvement (p < 0.0001), systemic therapy (p < 0.0001) and higher MALT-lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MALT-IPI) scores (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with the presence of serum Ig paraprotein. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that Ig paraproteinaemia was an independent prognostic predictor for inferior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. A new prognostic index based on MALT-IPI and Ig paraproteinaemia, as assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve statistics, showed better discriminative ability than MALT-IPI in predicting PFS. In conclusion, Ig paraproteinaemia was a promising prognostic predictor for MALT lymphoma. Ig paraproteinaemia together with MALT-IPI might contribute to optimising therapeutic management in clinical practice.

The role of axicabtagene ciloleucel as a treatment option for patients with follicular/marginal zone lymphoma

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) continues to make its way in the treatment of B-cell lymphomas. Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. While its prognosis is usually good, the disease is considered incurable and patients still relapse. High-risk subgroups such as high FLIPI score or early relapses (POD24) face poor outcomes. Current treatment options with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (Pi3K) inhibitors or other novel agents have clinical activity but short remission with cures remaining elusive. The ZUMA-5 study of axi-cel has shown high response rates with durable remissions with manageable toxicities, particularly in poor risk FL, replicating the outcomes in smaller and earlier studies. Long-term follow up will demonstrate the real impact of axi-cel in relapsed FL.

Rare lymphomas in routine practice - Treatment and outcome in marginal zone lymphoma in the prospective German Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms

Owing to its heterogeneity and rarity, management of disseminated marginal zone B‐cell lymphoma (MZL) remains largely understudied. We present prospective data on choice of systemic treatment and survival of patients with MZL treated in German routine practice. Of 175 patients with MZL who had been documented in the prospective clinical cohort study Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms (NCT00889798) collecting data on systemic treatment, 58 were classified as extranodal MZL of mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) and 117 as non‐MALT MZL. We analyzed the most commonly used first‐line and second‐line chemo(immuno)therapies between 2009 and 2016 and examined objective response rate (ORR), progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors for survival. Compared to patients with MALT MZL, those with non‐MALT MZL more often presented with bone marrow involvement (43% vs. 14%), Ann Arbor stage III/IV (72% vs. 57%) and were slightly less often in good general condition (ECOG = 0; 41% vs. 47%). In German routine practice, rituximab‐bendamustine for a median of 6 cycles was the most frequently used first‐line (76%) and second‐line treatment (36%), with no major differences between MZL subtypes. The ORR for patients encompassing any positive response was 81%. For patients with MALT and non‐MALT MZL, respectively, 5‐years PFS was 69% (95% CI 52%–81%) and 66% (95% CI 56%–75%), 5‐years OS 79% (95% CI 65%–89%) and 75% (95% CI 66%–83%). Cox proportional hazards models showed a significantly increased risk of mortality for higher age in all patient groups. Our prospective real world data give valuable insights into the management and outcome of non‐selected patients with MZL requiring systemic treatment and can help optimize therapy recommendations.

How do we sequence therapy for marginal zone lymphomas?

Marginal zone lymphomas are indolent diseases. Overall survival rates are very good, but patients tend to relapse and may do so several times. The concept of treatment sequencing is therefore important and necessary to preserve adequate organ function and to avoid excessive toxicity, with the final goal of achieving long survival times. Systemic treatments and chemotherapy are considered to be an option in multiply relapsing disease, in cases that are in an advanced stage at presentation or relapse, and in cases where initial local treatments lack efficacy. Targeted agents and new drugs can provide chemotherapy-free alternatives in heavily pretreated patients.

First Line Systemic Treatment for MALT Lymphoma-Do We Still Need Chemotherapy? Real World Data from the Medical University Vienna

There is no clear therapeutic algorithm for mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma beyond Helicobacter pylori eradication and while chemotherapy-based regimens are standard for MALT lymphoma patients in need of systemic treatment, it appears of interest to also investigate chemotherapy-free strategies. We have retrospectively assessed MALT lymphoma patients undergoing upfront systemic treatment, classified either as chemotherapy (=classical cytostatic agents +/- rituximab) or immunotherapy (=immunomodulatory agents or single anti-CD20 antibodies) at the Medical University Vienna 1999-2019. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). In total, 159 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 67 months. The majority of patients had extragastric disease (80%), but we also identified 32 patients (20%) with Helicobacter pylori negative or disseminated gastric lymphoma. Regarding the type of first line treatment and outcome, 46% (74/159) received a chemotherapy-based regimen and 54% (85/159) immunotherapy including IMiDs lenalidomide/thalidomide (37%), anti-CD20-anitbodies rituximab/ofatumumab (27%), macrolides clarithromycin/azithromycin (27%) and proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (9%). Median PFS was 76 months (95%CI 50-102), and while the overall response (90% vs. 68%, p < 0.01) and the complete remission rate (75% vs. 43%, p < 0.01) was significantly higher for chemotherapy, there was no difference in PFS between chemotherapy (median 81 months, 95%CI 47-116) and immunotherapy (76 months, 95%CI 50-103, p = 0.57), suggesting comparable long-term outcomes. To conclude, our data show higher response rates with chemo- compared to immunotherapy, but this did not translate into a superior PFS. Given the biological background of MALT lymphoma, and the favorable toxicity profile of novel immunomodulatory treatments, this should be further investigated.