Clinical practice recommendation on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia patients with FLT3-internal tandem duplication: a position statement from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Longitudinal outcome over four decades of allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a single center experience

This 45-year study (1978-2022) at a single institution evaluated HSCT outcomes and complications, emphasizing recent advances, with to provide insights into HSCT's evolving field and ongoing efforts to enhance patient outcomes. Involving 1707 patients, the study revealed an initial phase (1978-1987) with a limited activity that yielded modest outcomes, a nearly three-decade span (1988-2016) with a substantial increase in transplant activity, emphasizing umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) for patients lacking a suitable matched sibling donor. In addition to a gradual increase in recipient age, significant improvement in outcomes emerged in the recent period (2017-2022), marked by UCBT replacement with haploidentical transplants, introduction of PTCY-based GVHD prophylaxis for all type of transplants, and increased use of conditioning regimens with thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine. In this period, reductions in GVHD, non-relapse mortality, and relapse rates significantly contributed to improved overall survival, event-free survival, and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival. The study identified specific factors, including GVHD prophylaxis and donor selection changes, associated with these positive trends. This four-decade study provides a unique perspective on allogeneic HSCT, showcasing the dynamic evolution of transplantation practices and their impact on outcomes, offering valuable insights for personalized treatment approaches and emphasizing continual innovation in this critical therapeutic modality.

A simplified and robust risk stratification model for stem cell transplantation in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia

The efficacy of stem cell transplantation (SCT) in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (pAML) remains unsatisfactory due to the limitations of existing prognostic models in predicting efficacy and selecting suitable candidates. This study aims to develop a cytomolecular risk stratification-independent prognostic model for SCT in pAML patients at CR1 stage. The pAML SCT model, based on age, KMT2A rearrangement (KMT2A-r), and minimal residual disease at end of course 1 (MRD1), effectively classifies patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. We validate the effectiveness in an internal validation cohort and in four external validation cohorts, consisting of different graft sources and donors. Moreover, by incorporating the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3/internal tandem duplication (FLT3/ITD) allelic ratio, the pAML SCT model is refined, enhancing its ability to effectively select suitable candidates. We develop a simple and robust risk stratification model for pAML patients undergoing SCT, to aid in risk stratification and inform pretransplant decision-making at CR1 stage.

Sorafenib maintenance after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with FLT3+ AML receiving midostaurin during induction and consolidation: a retrospective analysis

Introduction

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse is the main cause of death after allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT). In AML FLT3+, it was shown that Sorafenib used as maintenance therapy after allo-SCT, significantly reduces the risk of relapse and death.

Methods

We analyzed 29 adult patients with FLT3m AML and underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant from 2019 to 2023. All patients received midostaurin plus conventional CT during induction and consolidation. After transplantation, Sorafenib maintenance was administered in all patients independently from MRD status at transplantation.

Results

Sorafenib maintenance was applied in 18 patients out 29 patients (62%). Median time to start sorafenib was 100 days (range 37-225) and median duration of treatment was 775 days (range 140-1064). For the whole population (n=29), 2-year OS, LFS, and CIR was 76%, 68% and 28%, respectively. The median time to relapse was 137 days (range 49-246). For patients treated with sorafenib (n=18), the 2-year OS, LFS, and CIR were 94%, 84% and 11%, respectively. For the whole population, the 100-day NRM was 0% and 1-year NRM was 3%. Death was caused by transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy in 1 patient. For patients who were administered with Sorafenib, the 1-y NRM was 5%. Death was caused by transplant associated transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy.

Discussion

This retrospective study suggests that sorafenib maintenance seem to be effective even in patients pre-treated with midostaurin.

Simultaneous inhibition of FLT3 and HDAC by novel 6-ethylpyrazine-2-Carboxamide derivatives provides therapeutic advantages in acute myelocytic leukemia

Synergetic inhibition of FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) by small molecule chimera presents a promising therapeutic approach for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with FLT3 mutations. In this study, we first observed that the combined use of FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib and HDAC inhibitor vorinostat increased the survival rate of leukemia xenograft mouse model. Then, we employed a pharmacophore fusion strategy to develop a novel series of FLT3/HDAC dual inhibitors. Among them, compound 25h demonstrated superior inhibitory activity against both FLT3 and HDAC. In particular, compound 25h exhibited enhanced anti-proliferation activity against MOLM-13 cells in comparison to gilteritinib, vorinostat, and their combination, while maintaining reduced cytotoxicity towards normal cells. Mechanistically, the heightened anti-tumor effect of compound 25h was attributed to its more potent regulation of intracellular pathways, notably phosphorylation of ERK, compared to single drug and combination treatments. Furthermore, compound 25h demonstrated superior anti-tumor efficacy in the MOLM-13 xenograft model compared to combination therapy, along with reduced in vivo toxicity. To conclude, we have identified a novel FLT3/HDAC dual inhibitor that could serve as a potential candidate for the treatment of AML.

[Preventing relapse of acute leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes in post-allograft transplantation: Prophylactic and preemptive strategies (SFGM-TC)]

Disease relapse remains the first cause of mortality of hematological malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for acute myeloid and lymphoid leukemia (AML and ALL) and for myelodysplastic syndroms (MDS). More and more patients are eligible for allo-HCT over the years and for many of them, only reduced intensity conditioning is possible, which is associated with a higher risk of relapse. Knowledge and biotechnology allow us to better identify diseases at very high risk of relapse and to measure residual disease before allo-HCT. Planning post-transplant maintenance treatment as part of a prophylaxis strategy is now feasible. Monitoring biomarkers of residual disease and post-transplant chimerism after allo-HCT allows a preemptive strategy. Within the frame of the 14th annual workshops of the Francophone Society for Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cell Therapy, the working group reviewed the literature and discussed novel strategies and therapies used to prevent relapse post-allo-HCT. Innovative drugs have been developed recently. Their toxicity profile allows their use post-allo-HCT, albeit with precaution. We reviewed the use of FLT3 inhibitors for AML, BCR::ABL inhibitors for Philadelphia chromosome for ALL, hypomethylating agents and Bcl-2 inhibitors for AML and MDS. The indications of immunomodulation and infusion of donor lymphocytes have been reviewed. Finally, we outlined methods of follow-up and support for patients receiving these prophylactic treatments.

Real-Life Management of FLT3-Mutated AML: Single-Centre Experience over 24 Years

We analyzed 140 patients with a median age of 51 years; 21% had WBC ≥ 100 × 109/L, and 52% had an NPM1 co-mutation. Until 2018, 101 patients received chemotherapy; thereafter, 39 received 3+7+midostaurin. The overall CR rate was 64%, higher in NPM1 mutant patients (73%). Univariate analysis showed that NPM1 mutation (p = 0.032) and WBC < 100 × 109/L (p = 0.013) positively influenced the response, with a trend for FLT3i administration (p = 0.052). Multivariate analysis confirmed WBC count as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.017). In CR1, 41/90 patients underwent allogeneic and 18 autologous transplantation. The median EFS was 1.1 vs. 1.6 years in autografted and allografted patients, respectively (p = 0.9). The one-year non-relapse mortality was 0.00% for autologous and 28% for allogeneic transplants (p = 0.007); CIR at 1 and 3 years was higher in autologous transplants (39% vs. 15% and 57% vs. 21%, p = 0.004). The median survival was not reached in the FLT3i group. Overall, 69 patients received stem cell transplantation (18 autologous, 51 allogeneic). Post-transplant FLT3i was resumed in eight patients, all alive after a median of 65 months. Allogeneic transplantation is crucial in FLT3-mutated AML, but the next challenge will be to identify which patients can benefit from transplants in CR1 and in which to intensify post-transplant therapy.

Perspectives and challenges of small molecule inhibitor therapy for FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous clonal disease characterized overall by an aggressive clinical course. The underlying genetic abnormalities present in leukemic cells contribute significantly to the AML phenotype. Mutations in FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) are one of the most common genetic abnormalities identified in AML, and the presence of these mutations strongly influences disease presentation and negatively impacts prognosis. Since mutations in FLT3 were identified in AML, they have been recognized as a valid therapeutic target resulting in decades of research to develop effective small molecule inhibitor treatment that could improve outcome for these patients. Despite the approval of several FLT3 inhibitors over the last couple of years, the treatment of patients with FLT3-mutated AML remains challenging and many questions still need to be addressed. This review will provide an up-to-date overview of our current understanding of FLT3-mutated AML and discuss what the current status is of the available FLT3 inhibitors for the day-to-day management of this aggressive disease.

[Preventive and therapeutic strategies for relapse after hematopoietic stem cell transplant for pediatric AML (SFGM-TC)]

Treatment of pediatric high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), defined either on molecular or cytogenetic features, relies on bone marrow transplant after cytologic remission. However, relapse remains the first post-transplant cause of mortality. In this 13th session of practice harmonization of the francophone society of bone marrow transplantation and cellular therapy (SFGM-TC), our group worked on recommendations regarding the management of post-transplant relapse in AML pediatric patients based on international literature, national survey and expert opinion. Overall, immunomodulation strategy relying on both measurable residual disease (MRD) and chimerism evaluation should be used for high-risk AML. In very high-risk (VHR) AML with a 5-year overall survival ≤30 %, a post-transplant maintenance should be proposed using either hypomethylating agents, combined with DLI whenever possible, or FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors if this target is present on leukemia cells. In the pre-emptive or early relapse settings (< 6 months post-transplant), treatments combining DLI, Azacytidine and Venetoclax should be considered. Access to phase I/II trails for targeted therapies (menin, IDH or JAK inhibitors) should be discussed in each patient according to the underlying molecular abnormalities of the disease.

Sorafenib maintenance in FLT3-ITD mutated AML after allogeneic HCT: a real-world, single-center experience

Despite allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) and the development of novel FLT3 inhibitors in both induction (midostaurin) and in the relapsed/refractory setting (gilteritinib), FLT3-ITD mutated leukemia (FLT3-ITD+ AML) still represents a challenge for modern hematology. Sorafenib is, to this date, the only inhibitor that demonstrated efficacy in improving both progression-free and overall survival as post-HCT maintenance therapy, even if its use in this setting has not been approved so far by regulatory agencies. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of sorafenib maintenance in preventing early relapse in FLT3-ITD+ AML after HCT in a single-center experience. We analyzed 26 consecutive patients who received post-HCT 2-year maintenance with sorafenib at our center between 2017 and 2023. The median time from HCT to sorafenib start was 130 days, and the median dosage was 200 mg per day. Two (8%) and three (12%) patients discontinued maintenance due to toxicity and disease relapse, respectively. Eight (31%) patients terminated the 2-year maintenance and stopped sorafenib, while 13 patients are still under treatment. Overall, 21/26 patients (81%) are alive and in stable complete remission as outlined by a 2-year disease-free survival of 83.61%. No major long-term toxicity was reported at the last follow-up. Our real-world experience supports the use of sorafenib as a feasible and effective therapeutic option in post-HCT maintenance for FLT3-ITD+ AML.

The potential of triplet combination therapies for patients with FLT3-ITD -mutated acute myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) encompasses a heterogeneous group of aggressive myeloid malignancies, where FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations are prevalent, accounting for approximately 25-30% of adult patients. The presence of this mutation is related to a dismal prognosis and high relapse rates. In the lasts years many FLT3 inhibitors have been developed.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a comprehensive overview of FLT3mut AML, summarizing the state of art of current treatment and available data about combination strategies including an FLT3 inhibitor.

EXPERT OPINION

In addition, the review discusses the emergence of drug resistance and the need for a nuanced approaches in treating patients who are ineligible for or resistant to intensive chemotherapy. Specifically, it explores the historical context of FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3Is) and their impact on treatment outcomes, emphasizing the pivotal role of midostaurin, as well as gilteritinib and quizartinib, and providing detailed insights into ongoing trials exploring the safety and efficacy of novel triplet combinations involving FLT3Is in different AML settings.

Efficacy and safety of FLT3 inhibitors in monotherapy of hematological and solid malignancies: a systemic analysis of clinical trials

Introduction: FLT3 mutations are closely associated with the occurrence of hematological and solid malignancies, especially with acute myeloid leukemia. Currently, several FLT3 inhibitors are in clinical trials, and some have been applied in clinic. However, the safety, efficacy and pharmacodynamics of these FLT3 inhibitors have not been systemically analyzed before. Methods: We searched and reviewed clinical trial reports on the monotherapy of 13 FLT3 inhibitors, including sorafenib, lestaurtinib, midostaurin, gilteritinib, quizartinib, sunitinib, crenolanib, tandutinib, cabozantinib, pexidartinib, pacritinib, famitinib, and TAK-659 in patients with hematological and solid malignancies before May 31, 2023. Results: Our results showed the most common adverse events (AEs) were gastrointestinal adverse reactions, including diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome and nausea, while the most common hematological AEs were febrile neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Based on the published data, the mean overall survival (OS) and the mean progression-free survival (PFS) were 9.639 and 5.905 months, respectively. The incidence of overall response rate (ORR), complete remission (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD) for all these FLT3 inhibitors was 29.0%, 8.7%, 16.0%, and 42.3%, respectively. The ORRs of FLT3 inhibitors in hematologic malignancies and solid tumors were 40.8% and 18.8%, respectively, indicating FLT3 inhibitors were more effective for hematologic malignancies than for solid tumors. In addition, time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) in these FLT3 inhibitors ranged from 0.7-12.0 hours, but the elimination half-life (T1/2) range was highly variable, from 6.8 to 151.8 h. Discussion: FLT3 inhibitors monotherapy has shown significant anti-tumor effect in clinic, and the effectiveness may be further improved through combination medication.

Prognostic impact of cooccurring mutations in FLT3-ITD pediatric acute myeloid leukemia

ABSTRACT

We sought to define the cooccurring mutational profile of FLT3-ITD-positive (ITDpos) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in pediatric and young adult patients and to define the prognostic impact of cooperating mutations. We identified 464 patients with FLT3-ITD mutations treated on Children's Oncology Group trials with available sequencing and outcome data. Overall survival, event-free survival (EFS), and relapse risk were determined according to the presence of cooccurring risk stratifying mutations. Among the cohort, 79% of patients had cooccurring alterations across 239 different genes that were altered through mutations or fusions. Evaluation of the prognostic impact of the cooccurring mutations demonstrated that patients with ITDpos AML experienced significantly different outcomes according to the cooccurring mutational profile. Patients with ITDpos AML harboring a cooccurring favorable-risk mutation of NPM1, CEBPA, t(8;21), or inv(16) experienced a 5-year EFS of 64%, which was significantly superior to of 22.2% for patients with ITDpos AML and poor-risk mutations of WT1, UBTF, or NUP98::NSD1 as well to 40.9% for those who lacked either favorable-risk or poor-risk mutation (ITDpos intermediate; P < .001 for both). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that cooccurring mutations had significant prognostic impact, whereas allelic ratio had no impact. Therapy intensification, specifically consolidation transplant in remission, resulted in significant improvements in survival for ITDpos AML. However, patients with ITDpos/NUP98::NSD1 continued to have poor outcomes with intensified therapy, including sorafenib. Cooccurring mutational profile in ITDpos AML has significant prognostic impacts and is critical to determining risk stratification and therapeutic allocation. These clinical trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00002798, NCT00070174, NCT00372593, and NCT01371981.

Treatment of a Patient with Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia with Multiple Isolated Relapses in the Central Nervous System: A Case Report and Mini-Review of the Literature

The efficacy of therapeutics for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) has exhibited an increase in recent years. Only a few patients experience relapse, including extramedullary relapse, and in patients with extramedullary relapse, the central nervous system (CNS) is the most common site. To date, there is no expert consensus or clinical guidelines available for CNS relapse, at least to the best of our knowledge. The optimal therapeutic strategy and management options for these patients remain unclear. The present study reports the treatment of a patient with APL with multiple isolated relapses in the CNS. In addition, through a mini-review of the literature, the present study provides a summary of various reports of this disease and discusses possible treatment options for these patients.

Continuously improving outcome over time after second allogeneic stem cell transplantation in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: an EBMT registry analysis of 1540 patients

Second allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT2) is among the most effective treatments for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse after first alloSCT (alloSCT1). Long-term EBMT registry data were used to provide large scale, up-to-date outcome results and to identify factors for improved outcome. Among 1540 recipients of alloSCT2, increasing age, better disease control and performance status before alloSCT2, more use of alternative donors and higher conditioning intensity represented important trends over time. Between the first (2000-2004) and last (2015-2019) period, two-year overall and leukemia-free survival (OS/LFS) increased considerably (OS: 22.5-35%, LFS: 14.5-24.5%). Cumulative relapse incidence (RI) decreased from 64% to 50.7%, whereas graft-versus-host disease and non-relapse mortality (NRM) remained unchanged. In multivariable analysis, later period of alloSCT2 was associated with improved OS/LFS (HR = 0.47/0.53) and reduced RI (HR = 0.44). Beyond, remission duration, disease stage and patient performance score were factors for OS, LFS, RI, and NRM. Myeloablative conditioning for alloSCT2 decreased RI without increasing NRM, leading to improved OS/LFS. Haploidentical or unrelated donors and older age were associated with higher NRM and inferior OS. In summary, outcome after alloSCT2 has continuously improved over the last two decades despite increasing patient age. The identified factors provide clues for the optimized implementation of alloSCT2.

Improvements in Posttransplant Outcomes Over Two Decades in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the EBMT ALWP Study

PURPOSE

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a disease of older patients. Progress in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) allowed the delivery of allo-HCT to older patients. We assessed changes over time in transplant characteristics and outcomes in patients with AML ages 65 years and above.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 7,215 patients with AML (median age 68 years, range 65-80) allografted between 2000 and 2021 in first complete remission (CR1; 64%), second or subsequent remission (CR2+; 14%), or active disease (22%).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 40 months. The 3-year cumulative relapse incidence (RI) gradually and significantly decreased from 37% to 31%, then to 30% (P = 0.001) over the three time periods (2000-2009; 2010-2014; 2015-2021), whereas nonrelapse mortality (NRM) decreased from 31% and 31% to 27% (P = 0.003). The 3-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) gradually and significantly improved from 32% to 38%, and then to 44% (P = 0.001) and from 37% to 42%, and then to 49% (P = 0.001), respectively. In multivariate analysis, significant improvement in the RI, LFS, and OS were noted after 2015, whereas NRM was not significantly affected. This improvement was observed regardless of disease status at transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

In older patients with AML, we observed an impressive improvement over time in posttransplant outcomes, mostly attributed to decreased RI rather than decreased NRM, and regardless of disease status at transplant. These large-scale, real-world data can serve as a benchmark for future studies in this setting and indicate that the opportunity for transplant for the elderly should be mandatory and no longer an option.

Advancements and Challenges in the Treatment of AML

The therapeutic arsenal for the management of AML has expanded significantly in recent years. Before 2017, newly diagnosed AML was treated with either standard cytarabine- and anthracycline-based induction chemotherapy (for all fit patients) or a single-agent hypomethylating agent (in unfit patients or those 75 years and older). While assessing patient fitness remains important, characterizing the disease biology has become critical to select the optimal initial therapy for each patient with more options available. FLT3 inhibitors, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, and CPX-351 have been shown to improve outcomes for specific subsets of patients. Venetoclax (VEN) with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) is the standard-of-care frontline regimen for most older patients, except perhaps for those with an IDH1 mutation where ivosidenib with azacitidine may also be considered. On the basis of the success seen with HMA/VEN in older patients, there is now increasing interest in incorporating VEN into frontline regimens in younger patients, with promising data from multiple early phase studies. This article focuses on recent updates and ongoing challenges in the management of AML, with a particular focus on the ongoing challenge of secondary AML and considerations regarding the selection of initial therapy in younger patients. An overview of common side effects and toxicities associated with targeted therapies is also presented here, along with recommended strategies to mitigate these risks.

Considerations regarding maintenance therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in remission

INTRODUCTION

For most adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia, relapse is characteristic of the disease. When allotransplant in first complete remission is administered as consolidative therapy, relapse is still common, affecting 20-40% of recipients. Maintenance of remission with low-dose treatments may hold promise in preventing relapse.

AREAS COVERED

Improvements in the detection of clinical and biological variants of disease allow the practitioner to identify which patients, based on disease features, may benefit from therapy directed at residual clonal elements that might contribute to relapse. Along with improvements in methods of detecting residual disease, novel agents are under investigation as a platform in order to maintain remission and may contribute to prolonged survival. In this manuscript, we review literature available through PubMed regarding the use of maintenance therapy, described as post-remission or post-transplant treatment intended to delay or prevent relapse.

EXPERT OPINION

Although results of randomized studies are limited, a role for maintenance therapy, particularly directed at molecular targets, in distinct settings of post-remission management is recommended. We also advise that randomized studies of immune therapy along with opportunities for further evaluation of risk-agnostic interventions be a focus of cooperative groups.

FLT3 targeting in the modern era: from clonal selection to combination therapies

Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) is the most frequently mutated gene in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Modern targeting of FLT3 with inhibitors has improved clinical outcomes and FLT3 inhibitors have been incorporated into the treatment of AML in all phases of the disease, including the upfront, relapsed/refractory and maintenance settings. This review will discuss the current understanding of FLT3 biology, the clinical use of FLT3 inhibitors, resistance mechanisms and emerging combination treatment strategies.

Improved Posttransplant Outcomes in Recent Years for AML Patients with FLT3-ITD and Wild-type NPM1: A Report from the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party

PURPOSE

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is recommended in first complete remission (CR1) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD). We assessed changes over time in transplant characteristics and outcomes in patients with AML age 60 years and younger with a FLT3-ITD.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We identified 1,827 adult patients with AML (median age 49 years, range 18-60) with FLT3-ITD and intermediate karyotype, allografted between 2012 and 2021 in CR1.

RESULTS

NPM1 was mutated in 72% of patients. We compared changes over time in 688 patients transplanted between 2012 and 2016, and 1,139 patients transplanted between 2017 and 2021. For patients with wild-type NPM1, the 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) significantly improved over time from 54% to 64% (HR = 0.67; P = 0.011) and from 63% to 71% (HR = 0.66; P = 0.021), respectively. Allo-HCT in recent years significantly reduced the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). For patients with NPM1 mutation, no significant changes over time were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AML with FLT3-ITD and wild-type NPM1, we noticed a significant decrease over time in the CIR and improvement of LFS and OS, likely reflecting the efficacy of FLT-3 inhibitors, including when used as posttransplant maintenance, in this high-risk setting. On the contrary, no significant change over time was noticed in outcomes of patients harboring a FLT3 and NPM1 mutation.

What Influences the Decision to Proceed to Transplant for Patients With AML in First Remission?

Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the backbone of curative treatment for the majority of fit adults diagnosed with AML, there is indeed a subset of patients for whom long-term remission may be achieved without transplantation. Remarkable changes in our knowledge of AML biology in recent years has transformed the landscape of diagnosis, management, and treatment of AML. Specifically, markedly increased understanding of molecular characteristics of AML, the expanded application of minimal/measurable residual diseases testing, and an increased armamentarium of leukemia-directed therapeutic agents have created a new paradigm for the medical care of patients with AML. An attempt is herein made to decipher the decision to proceed to transplant for patients with AML in first complete remission on the basis of the current best available evidence. The focus is on factors affecting the biology and treatment of AML itself, rather than on variables related to allo-HCT, an area characterized by significant advancements that have reduced overall therapy-related complications. This review seeks to focus on areas of particular complexity, while simultaneously providing clarity on how our current knowledge and treatment strategies may, or may not, influence the decision to pursue allo-HCT in patients with AML.

Treatment with midostaurin and other FLT3 targeting inhibitors is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events in patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with FLT3-mutated AML

The addition of midostaurin to standard chemotherapy has improved survival in patients with FLT3-mutated AML. However, the impact of midostaurin and other FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3i) on cardiovascular adverse events (CAEs) has not been studied in patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a real-world setting. We reviewed 132 patients with AML who were treated with intensive induction therapy and consecutive allogeneic stem cell transplantation at our institution (42 FLT3-mutated AML and 90 with FLT3 wildtype). We identified treatment with midostaurin and/or FLT3i as an independent risk factor for CAEs not resulting in higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) or impaired overall survival (OS). Hence, close monitoring for CAEs is warranted for these patients.

Impact of genetic patterns on sorafenib efficacy in patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a multi-center, cohort study

Sorafenib therapy improves overall survival (OS) in patients with FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We explored the efficacy of sorafenib therapy in this population with different concomitant genetic patterns. In this multi-center, cohort study, we enrolled patients with FLT3-ITD AML undergoing allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Patients with sorafenib maintenance post-transplantation for at least four weeks were allocated to the sorafenib group, and otherwise to the control group. Endpoints were OS, disease-free survival, and relapse for the whole cohort and OS for genetic pattern subgroups. Among 613 patients enrolled, 275 were in the sorafenib and 338 the control group. Median follow-up was 36.5 (interquartile range (IQR), 25.2-44.7) months post-transplantation. The 3-year OS post-transplantation was 79.6% (95% confidential interval (CI) 74.8%-84.6%) and 65.2% (95% CI 60.3%-70.6%) (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.50, 95% CI 0.37-0.69; P < 0.0001) in both groups. Sorafenib maintenance post-transplantation improved OS in the favorable (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.77; P = 0.011) and adverse (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.93; P = 0.026) ELN 2017 risk subgroups. Patients with mutated NPM1, DNMT3A, co-occurring NPM1/DNMT3A, "activated signaling" and "DNA methylation" genes benefited in OS from sorafenib maintenance, while those carrying CEBPA, "tumor suppressors" and "myeloid transcription factors" genes did not. Patients with FLT3-ITDhigh and FLT3-ITDlow AML both benefited in OS from sorafenib maintenance. Our results identify the response of genetic patterns to sorafenib maintenance, providing new viewpoints for the optimal use of sorafenib in FLT3-ITD AML in the transplantation setting.

Characteristics and Outcome of FLT3-ITD-Positive Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia-Experience of Polish Pediatric Leukemia and Lymphoma Study Group from 2005 to 2022

BACKGROUND

The FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene mutated in 10-15% of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with an inferior outcome. The aim of the study was to analyze the outcome and characteristics of FLT3-ITD-positive pediatric AML.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the nationwide pediatric AML database from between 2005 and 2022. FLT3-ITD was found in 54/497 (10.7%) patients with available analysis. Three consecutive treatment protocols were used (AML-BFM 2004 Interim, AML-BFM 2012 Registry, AML-BFM 2019 recommendations).

RESULTS

Probabilities of 5-year overall (OS), event-free (EFS) and relapse-free survival were significantly lower in the FLT3-ITD-positive patients compared to FLT3-ITD-negative (0.54 vs. 0.71, p = 0.041; 0.36 vs. 0.59, p = 0.0004; 0.47 vs. 0.70, p = 0.0029, accordingly). An improvement in the outcome was found in the analyzed period of time, with a trend of better survival in patients treated under the AML-BFM 2012 and AML-BFM 2019 protocols compared to the AML-BFM 2004 protocol (5-year EFS 0.52 vs. 0.27, p = 0.069). There was a trend of improved outcomes in patients treated with FLT3 inhibitors (n = 9, 2-year EFS 0.67 vs. 0.33, p = 0.053) and those who received stem cell transplantation (SCT) (n = 26; 5-year EFS 0.70 vs. 0.27, p = 0.059). The co-occurrence of the WT1 mutation had a dismal impact on the prognosis (5-year EFS 0.23 vs. 0.69, p = 0.002), while the NPM1 mutation improved survival (5-year OS 1.0 vs. 0.44, p = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

It seems that SCT and FLT3 inhibitors have a beneficial impact on the prognosis. Additional genetic alterations, like the WT1 and NPM1 mutations, significantly influence the outcome.

A venetoclax and azacitidine bridge-to-transplant strategy for NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia in molecular failure

NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia (NPM1mut AML) represents a mostly favourable/intermediate risk disease that benefits from allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in case of measurable residual disease (MRD) relapse or persistence after induction chemotherapy. Although the negative prognostic role of pre-HSCT MRD is established, no recommendations are available for the management of peri-transplant molecular failure (MF). Based on the efficacy data of venetoclax (VEN)-based treatment in NPM1mut AML older patients, we retrospectively analysed the off-label combination of VEN plus azacitidine (AZA) as bridge-to-transplant strategy in 11 NPM1mut MRD-positive fit AML patients. Patients were in MRD-positive complete remission (CRMRDpos ) at the time of treatment: nine in molecular relapse and two in molecular persistence. After a median number of two cycles (range 1-4) of VEN-AZA, 9/11 (81.8%) achieved CRMRD -negative (CRMRDneg ). All 11 patients proceeded to HSCT. With a median follow-up from treatment start of 26 months, and a median post-HSCT follow-up of 19 months, 10/11 patients are alive (1 died from non-relapse mortality), and 9/10 patients are in MRDneg status. This patient series highlights the efficacy and safety of VEN-AZA to prevent overt relapse, achieve deep responses and preserve patient fitness before HSCT, in patients with NPM1mut AML in MF.

Sorafenib maintenance after allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia: long-term follow-up of an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Our open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial showed that sorafenib maintenance after haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) improved overall survival and reduced relapse for patients with FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Here, we present a post-hoc analysis on the 5-year follow-up data of this trial.

METHODS

This phase 3 trial, done in seven hospitals in China, included patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing allogeneic HSCT, who were aged 18-60 years, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, had composite complete remission before and after transplantation, and had haematopoietic recovery within 60 days after transplantation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive sorafenib maintenance (400 mg orally twice daily) or non-maintenance (control) at 30-60 days after transplantation. Randomisation was done with permuted blocks (block size four) via an interactive web-based system. Investigators and participants were not masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was the 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse, which was reported previously. For this updated analysis, the 5-year endpoints were overall survival; cumulative incidence of relapse; non-relapse mortality; leukaemia-free survival; graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS); cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD; and late effects in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02474290, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between June 20, 2015, and July 21, 2018, 202 patients were randomly assigned to sorafenib maintenance (n=100) or non-maintenance (n=102). Median follow-up was 60·4 months (IQR 16·7-73·3). Extended follow-up showed improved overall survival (72·0% [95% CI 62·1-79·7] vs 55·9% [45·7-64·9]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·55, 95% CI 0·34-0·88; p=0·011), leukaemia-free survival (70·0% [60·0-78·0] vs 49·0% [39·0-58·3]; 0·47, 0·30-0·73; p=0·0007), and GRFS (58·0% [47·7-67·0] vs 39·2% [29·8-48·5]; 0·56, 0·38-0·83; p=0·0030), lower cumulative incidence of relapse (15·0% [8·8-22·7] vs 36·3% [27·0-45·6]; 0·33, 0·18-0·60; p=0·0003), and no increase in non-relapse mortality (15·0% [8·8-22·7] vs 14·7% [8·6-22·3]; 0·79, 0·39-1·62; p=0·98) for patients in the sorafenib group compared with those in the control group. The 5-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (54·0% [43·7-63·2] vs 51·0% [40·8-60·3]; 0·82, 0·56-1·19; p=0·73) did not differ significantly between the two groups and we did not find substantial differences in late effects between the two groups. There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

With extended follow-up, sorafenib maintenance after transplantation is associated with improved long-term survival and reduced relapse rates compared with non-maintenance, further supporting this strategy as a standard of care for patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing allogeneic HSCT.

FUNDING

None.

TRANSLATION

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Impact of disease burden on clinical outcomes of AML patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Pre-transplant detectable measurable residual disease (MRD) is still associated with high risk of relapse and poor outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We aimed at evaluating the impact of disease burden on prediction of relapse and survival in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in first remission (CR1). We identified a total of 3202 adult AML patients, of these 1776 patients were in CR1 and MRD positive and 1426 patients were primary refractory at time of transplant. After a median follow-up of 24.4 months, non-relapse mortality and relapse rate were significantly higher in the primary refractory group compared to the CR1 MRD positive group (Hazards Ratio (HR) = 1.82 (95% CI: 1.47-2.24) p < 0.001 and HR = 1.54 (95% CI: 1.34-1.77), p < 0.001), respectively. Leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly worse in the primary refractory group (HR = 1.61 (95% CI: 1.44-1.81), p < 0.001 and HR = 1.71 (95% CI: 1.51-1.94), p < 0.001, respectively). Our real-life data suggest that patients in CR1 and MRD positive at time of transplant could still be salvaged by allo-HCT with a 2-year OS of 63%, if negative MRD cannot be obtained and their outcomes are significantly better than patients transplanted with active disease.

Novel strategies to prevent and overcome relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The outcome of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has improved over time with the incorporation of multi-agent chemotherapy in the treatment landscape as well as the recent approval of immunotherapeutic agents allowing a larger proportion of patients to undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) which is still considered a potential curative approach. However, relapse post-transplant is still occurring and constitutes a common cause of treatment failure in B-ALL. The present review aims to discuss the novel strategies and therapies used to prevent and overcome relapse post allo-HCT in patients with ALL, focusing on the role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Philadelphia chromosome positive B-ALL, the role of innovative agents such as blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin, and finally the role of cellular therapy.

Post-transplant maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation harmonizing multiple therapeutic modalities including targeted therapy, immunotherapy and cellular therapy

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) has improved survival for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially for those at high risk of relapse. However, relapse remains the leading cause of treatment failure post-HCT, occurring in around 35-45% of patients, and leading to dismal outcomes. Strategies to reduce relapse risk are urgently needed, especially in the early post-transplant period before activation of the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Maintenance therapy is a course of treatment given post-HCT with the expectation of reducing relapse risk. While there are currently no therapies approved for maintenance therapy for AML after HCT, there are a number of studies and ongoing investigations examining the role of maintenance therapies that include targeted agents against FLT3-ITD, BCL2, or IDH mutations, hypomethylating agents, immunomodulatory therapies and cellular therapies. In this review, we discuss the mechanistic and clinical data for post-transplant maintenance therapies in AML and strategies for maintenance therapy for AML after HCT.

Preclinical Validation of an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product Based on Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Specific for Mutated Nucleophosmin (NPM1mut) for the Treatment of NPM1mut-Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with nucleophosmin (NPM1) genetic mutations is the most common subtype in adult patients. Refractory or relapsed disease in unfit patients or after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has a poor prognosis. NPM1-mutated protein, stably expressed on tumor cells but not on normal tissues, may serve as an ideal target for NPM1-mutated AML immunotherapy. The study aim was to investigate the feasibility of producing mutated-NPM1-specific cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) suitable for somatic cell therapy to prevent or treat hematologic relapse in patients with NPM1-mutated AML. T cells were expanded or primed from patient or donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells by NPM1-mutated protein-derived peptides, and tested for leukemia antigen-targeted cytotoxic activity, cytokine production and hematopoietic precursor inhibitory effect. We found that mutated-NPM1-specific CTLs, displaying specific cytokine production and high-level cytotoxicity against patients' leukemia blasts, and limited inhibitory activity in clonogenic assays, could be obtained from both patients and donors. The polyfunctional mutated-NPM1-specific CTLs included both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells endowed with strong lytic capacity. Our results suggest that mutated-NPM1-targeted CTLs may be a useful therapeutic option to control low-tumor burden relapse following conventional chemotherapy in older NPM1-mutated AML patients or eradicate persistent MRD after HSCT.

Targeting FLT3 Mutation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Strategies and Future Directions

FLT3 mutations are present in 30% of newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Two broad categories of FLT3 mutations are ITD and TKD, with the former having substantial clinical significance. Patients with FLT3-ITD mutation present with a higher disease burden and have inferior overall survival, due to high relapse rates after achieving remission. The development of targeted therapies with FLT3 inhibitors over the past decade has substantially improved clinical outcomes. Currently, two FLT3 inhibitors are approved for use in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: midostaurin in the frontline setting, in combination with intensive chemotherapy; and gilteritinib as monotherapy in the relapsed refractory setting. The addition of FLT3 inhibitors to hypomethylating agents and venetoclax offers superior responses in several completed and ongoing studies, with encouraging preliminary data. However, responses to FLT3 inhibitors are of limited duration due to the emergence of resistance. A protective environment within the bone marrow makes eradication of FLT3^mut leukemic cells difficult, while prior exposure to FLT3 inhibitors leads to the development of alternative FLT3 mutations as well as activating mutations in downstream signaling, promoting resistance to currently available therapies. Multiple novel therapeutic strategies are under investigation, including BCL-2, menin, and MERTK inhibitors, as well as FLT3-directed BiTEs and CAR-T therapy.

Outcomes in Patients with FLT3-Mutated Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Underwent Transplantation in the Phase 3 ADMIRAL Trial of Gilteritinib versus Salvage Chemotherapy

The fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor gilteritinib improved the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in the phase 3 ADMIRAL trial. In this study, we assessed survival and relapse rates of patients in the ADMIRAL trial who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), as well as safety outcomes in patients who received post-transplantation gilteritinib maintenance therapy. ADMIRAL was a global phase 3 randomized controlled trial that enrolled adult patients with FLT3-mutated R/R AML. Patients with R/R AML who harbored FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations in the juxtamembrane domain or D835/I836 point mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain were randomized (2:1) to gilteritinib (120 mg/day) or to preselected high- or low-intensity salvage chemotherapy (1 or 2 cycles). Patients in the gilteritinib arm who proceeded to HSCT could receive post-transplantation gilteritinib maintenance therapy if they were within 30 to 90 days post-transplantation and had achieved composite complete remission (CRc) with successful engraftment and no post-transplantation complications. Adverse events (AEs) during HSCT were recorded in the gilteritinib arm only. Survival outcomes and the cumulative incidence of relapse were assessed in patients who underwent HSCT during the trial. Treatment-emergent AEs were evaluated in patients who restarted gilteritinib as post-transplantation maintenance therapy. Patients in the gilteritinib arm underwent HSCT more frequently than those in the chemotherapy arm (26% [n = 64] versus 15% [n = 19]). For all transplantation recipients, 12- and 24-month overall survival (OS) rates were 68% and 47%, respectively. Despite a trend toward longer OS after pretransplantation CRc, post-transplantation survival was comparable in the 2 arms. Patients who resumed gilteritinib after HSCT had a low relapse rate after pretransplantation CRc (20%) or CR (0%). The most common AEs observed with post-transplantation gilteritinib therapy were increased alanine aminotransferase level (45%), pyrexia (43%), and diarrhea (40%); grade ≥3 AEs were related primarily to myelosuppression. The incidences of grade ≥III acute graft-versus-host disease and related mortality were low. Post-transplantation survival was similar across the 2 study arms in the ADMIRAL trial, but higher remission rates with gilteritinib facilitated receipt of HSCT. Gilteritinib as post-transplantation maintenance therapy had a stable safety and tolerability profile and was associated with low relapse rates. Taken together, these data support a preference for bridging therapy with gilteritinib over chemotherapy in transplantation-eligible patients.

[Clinical study of induction chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of FLT3-ITD(+) acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype]

Objective: To assess the efficacy of induction chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in the treatment of FLT3-ITD(+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with normal karyotype. Methods: The clinical data of FLT3-ITD(+) AML patients with normal karyotype in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from Jan 2018 to March 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The study included 49 patients with FLT3-ITD(+)AML, 31 males, and 18 females, with a median age of 46 (16-59) years old. All patients received induction chemotherapy, and 24 patients received sequential allo-HSCT (transplantation group) . The median follow-up time was 465 days, the one-year overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was (70.0 ± 7.4) %, and one-year disease-free survival (DFS) was (70.3±7.4) %. The one-year OS was significantly different between the transplantation group and the non-transplantation group [ (85.2 ± 7.9) % vs (52.6 ± 12.3) %, P=0.049]. but one-year DFS [ (84.7 ± 8.1) % vs (55.2 ± 11.9) %, P=0.061] was not. No significance was found in one-year OS between patients with low-frequency and high-frequency FLT3-ITD(+) (P>0.05) . There were 12 patients with high-frequency FLT3-ITD(+) in the transplantation and the non-transplantation groups, respectively. The one-year OS [ (68.8 ± 15.7) % in the transplantation group vs (26.2 ± 15.3) % in the non-transplantation group, P=0.027] and one-year DFS [ (45.5 ± 21.3) % in the transplantation group vs (27.8±15.8) % in the non-transplantation group, P=0.032] were significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: Induction chemotherapy followed by allo-HSCT can enhance the prognosis of FLT3-ITD(+) patients, particularly those with FLT3-ITD high-frequency mutation.

Clinical Implications of the FLT3-ITD Allelic Ratio in Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the Context of an Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Although the presence of FLT3-ITD, as well as levels of the FLT3-ITD allelic ratio, have been described as prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), little is known about how the FLT3-ITD allelic ratio impacts patients' outcomes when receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We analyzed 118 patients (median age at diagnosis 58.3, range 14.3-82.3 years) harboring FLT3-ITD, of whom 94 patients were consolidated with an allogeneic HSCT and included in outcome analyses. A high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio was associated with a higher white blood cell count, higher blood and bone marrow blasts, and worse ELN2017 risk at diagnosis. Patients with a high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio more often had NPM1 mutations, while patients with a low allelic ratio more often had FLT3-TKD mutations. Patients with a high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio were less likely to achieve a measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remission prior to allogeneic HSCT and had a trend for a shorter time to relapse. However, there was no distinct cumulative incidence of relapse, non-relapse mortality, or overall survival according to the FLT3-ITD allelic ratio in transplanted patients. While co-mutated FLT3-TKD was associated with better outcomes, the MRD status at HSCT was the most significant factor for outcomes. While our data indicates that an allogeneic HSCT may mitigate the adverse effect of a high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio, comparative studies are needed to evaluate which FLT3-ITD mutated patients benefit from which consolidation strategy.

New drugs before, during, and after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with acute myeloid leukemia

The treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has evolved over the past few years with the advent of next-generation sequencing. Targeted therapies alone or in combination with low-dose or high-intensity chemotherapy have improved the outcome of patients with AML treated in the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings. Despite these advances, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains essential as consolidation therapy following frontline treatment in intermediate-and adverse-risk and relapsed/refractory disease. However, many patients relapse, with limited treatment options, hence the need for post-transplant strategies to mitigate relapse risk. Maintenance therapy following allo-HCT was developed for this specific purpose and can exploit either a direct anti-leukemia effect and/or enhance the bona fide graft-versus-leukemia effect without increasing the risk of graft-versus-host disease. In this paper, we summarize novel therapies for AML before, during, and after allo-HCT and review ongoing studies.

How to improve the outcomes of elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients through allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

In recent years, with the gradual advancement of haploidentical transplantation technology, the availability of donors has increased significantly, along with the widespread use of reduced-intensity conditioning and the improvement of nursing techniques, giving more elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients the chance to receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We have summarized the classic and recently proposed pre-transplant assessment methods and assessed the various sources of donors, conditioning regimens, and post-transplant complication management based on the outcomes of large-scale clinical studies for elderly AML patients.

Experimental drugs in clinical trials for acute myeloid leukemia: innovations, trends, and opportunities

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by many cytogenetic and molecular alterations. Due to better knowledge of the molecular basis of AML, many targeted therapies have been introduced and registered, e.g. FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitors, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 mutation inhibitors, and Bcl-2 inhibitor. Despite that, the cure for AML remains an unmet clinical need in most patients.

AREAS COVERED

The review aims to present new, not yet registered drugs for AML. We searched the English literature for articles concerning AML, targeted drugs, menin inhibitors, DOT1L, BET, IDH inhibitors, FLT3, hedgehog inhibitors, Polo-like kinase inhibitors, RNA splicing, and immune therapies via PubMed. Publications from January 2000 to August 2022 were scrutinized. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles and Google search. Conference proceedings from the previous 5 years of The American Society of Hematology, the European Hematology Association, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology were searched manually. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references.

EXPERT OPINION

For several years, the therapeutic approach in AML has become more individualized. Novel groups of drugs give hope for greater curability. High response rates have agents that restore the activity of the p53 protein. In addition, agents that work independently of a particular mutation seem promising for AML without any known mutation.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions |The Role of Maintenance Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive disease predominantly affecting the elderly population. Although, up to 65% of patients with AML achieve a complete remission with standard induction chemotherapy, the majority of patients will relapse and succumb to the disease. Although maintenance therapy is a component of standard management for various hematological malignancies, such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) or multiple myeloma, past studies investigating the role of maintenance therapy in AML were unable to demonstrate an advantage in overall survival, and therefore, it has not been an established practice in the treatment of AML. For patients, who are not candidates for stem cell transplant, effective AML maintenance therapies are needed in order to reduce the risk of relapse. Over the past decades, many investigators have examined the role of various maintenance strategies in AML; with the intention to prolong remission and overall survival. This review will provide an overview of prior and ongoing approaches and strategies to maintenance therapy for AML.

Advances in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Leukemia

In acute leukemia, advances have been made in therapeutic strategies centered on allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), three of which are presented here. The indication of allo-SCT for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 1st complete remission (CR1) has been debated. Genomic medicine has helped us gain a deeper understanding of this disease, some of which may serve as prognostic factors. Such genetic abnormalities could also help measure minimal residual disease (MRD) and provide additional clues to estimate the efficacy of chemotherapy. Combined with existing prognostic factors, these data can be used to construct a more accurate prognostic model, providing an optimal indication of allo-SCT for AML in CR1. Furthermore, overall treatment algorithms for high-risk AML after allo-SCT should include prophylactic and pre-emptive treatment to prevent relapse. These include immunotherapy using donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), FLT3 inhibitors in FLT3-mutated AML, hypomethylating agents, or a combination of DLI with these agents. Clinical trials are currently ongoing to elucidate the role of these strategies, which will lead to a risk-adapted treatment for preventing relapse in high-risk AML. CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy induces a remarkable response in B-acute lymphoid leukemia (B-ALL); however, relapse remains a major problem. In this regard, allo-SCT as a consolidation treatment after CAR-T cell therapy for B-ALL is recommended for pediatric and adult patients. Achieving complete remission (CR) with CAR-T cell therapy is considered a promising bridging therapy to allo-SCT. Novel CAR-T treatment techniques are being developed to change their role as a pre-transplant treatment.

In 2022, which is preferred: haploidentical or cord transplant?

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the treatment of choice for high-risk hematological malignancies such as acute myeloid and lymphocytic leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and myeloproliferative disorders. Alternative donor transplantation from either haploidentical (haplo-SCT) or cord blood donor (CBT) is an established therapeutic alternative for patients who need transplants but lack a human leukocyte antigen-matched donor. Although haplo-SCT (mainly non-T-cell-depleted haplo-SCT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide) is increasing while CBT is decreasing worldwide (Figure 1), recent developments in CBT, especially cord blood expansion and other strategies to improve engraftment and immune reconstitution post-CBT, make CBT still a valuable option. This article discusses the 2 options based on the currently available data, focusing on adults, and tries to give some clues to help the transplant physician choose a haploidentical vs a cord blood donor. Given the limited numbers of published or ongoing well-designed randomized controlled trials comparing haplo-SCT to CBT and the overall similar clinical results in the available, mostly registry-based, and single-center studies, with substantial heterogeneity and variability, the decision to perform haplo-SCT or CBT in a given patient depends not only on the patient, disease, and donor characteristics and donor availability (although most if not all patients should have in principle an alternative donor) but also on the transplant physician's discretion and, most importantly, the center's experience and preference and ongoing protocols and strategies.

Therapeutic Targeting of FLT3 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Status and Novel Approaches

FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) is mutated in approximately 30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. The presence of FLT3-ITD (internal tandem duplication, 20-25%) mutation and, to a lesser extent, FLT3-TKD (tyrosine kinase domain, 5-10%) mutation is associated with poorer diagnosis and therapy response since the leukemic cells become hyperproliferative and resistant to apoptosis after continuous activation of FLT3 signaling. Targeting FLT3 has been the focus of many pre-clinical and clinical studies. Hence, many small-molecule FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3is) have been developed, some of which are approved such as midostaurin and gilteritinib to be used in different clinical settings, either in combination with chemotherapy or alone. However, many questions regarding the best treatment strategy remain to be answered. On the other hand, various FLT3-dependent and -independent resistance mechanisms could be evolved during FLT3i therapy which limit their clinical impact. Therefore, identifying molecular mechanisms of resistance and developing novel strategies to overcome this obstacle is a current interest in the field. In this review, recent studies of approved FLT3i and knowledge about major resistance mechanisms of clinically approved FLT3i's will be discussed together with novel treatment approaches such as designing novel FLT3i and dual FLT3i and combination strategies including approved FLT3i plus small-molecule agents targeting altered molecules in the resistant cells to abrogate resistance. Moreover, how to choose an appropriate FLT3i for the patients will be summarized based on what is currently known from available clinical data. In addition, strategies beyond FLT3i's including immunotherapeutics, small-molecule FLT3 degraders, and flavonoids will be summarized to highlight potential alternatives in FLT3-mutated AML therapy.

The prevention of disease relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia

Disease relapse represents by far the most frequent cause of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) failure. Patients with acute leukemia suffering relapse after HCT have limited conventional treatment options with little possibility of cure and represent, de facto, suitable candidates for the evaluation of novel cellular and biological-based therapies. Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) has been one of the first cellular therapies adopted to treat post HCT relapse of acute leukemia patients and still now, it is widely adopted in preemptive and prophylactic settings, with renewed interest for manipulated cellular products such as NK-DLI. The acquisition of novel biological insights into pathobiology of leukemia relapse are translating into the clinic, with novel combinations of target therapies and novel agents, helping delineate new therapeutical landscapes. Hypomethylating agents alone or in combination with novel drugs demonstrated their efficacy in pre-clinical models and controlled trials. FLT3 inhibitors represent an essential therapeutical instrument incorporated in post-transplant maintenance strategies. The Holy grail of allogeneic transplantation lies in the separation of graft-vs.-host disease from graft vs. tumor effects and after more than five decades, is still the most ambitious goal to reach and many ways to accomplish are on their way.

FLT3 Inhibitors as Maintenance Therapy after Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation

Mutations in the FLT3 gene are associated with poor prognosis in patients with AML, even after consolidation with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in first remission. Treatment failure in FLT3-mutated AML is largely driven by excessive risk of relapse compared to other genetic subtypes, including in patients post-alloHCT. As a result, there is substantial interest in studying posttransplant maintenance therapy in FLT3-mutated AML as an approach to optimize disease control and improve long-term outcomes. Clinical trials utilizing posttransplant FLT3 inhibitors, such as sorafenib and midostaurin, have shown feasibility, safety, and encouraging posttransplant outcomes, and there are ongoing studies using newer-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors as posttransplant maintenance therapy. Here, we review the toxicities and efficacy of FLT3 inhibitors as posttransplant maintenance, recommendations on the use of FLT3 inhibitors by international consensus guidelines, and highlight key remaining questions.

Effect of sorafenib maintenance on Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus infections in patients with FLT3-ITD AML undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Use of kinase inhibitors such as dasatinib and imatinib might increase the risk of opportunistic infections, especially Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections. However, the effect of sorafenib on EBV and CMV infections remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of sorafenib maintenance post-transplantation on the incidence and mortality of EBV and CMV infections in patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia.

METHODS

This was a follow-up of our randomized controlled trial undertaken at seven hospitals in China. The primary endpoint was EBV and CMV infections within 3 years post-transplantation. Secondary endpoints included the cumulative incidences of relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) at 3 years.

RESULTS

Two hundred two patients were assigned to sorafenib maintenance (n=100) or non-maintenance (control, n=102). Median extended follow-up post-transplantation was 36.8 (range, 2.5-67.1) months. The 3-year cumulative incidences of EBV-DNAemia and EBV-associated diseases were 24.0% (95% CI: 16.1-32.8%) and 5.0% (1.8-10.6%) in the sorafenib group, and 24.5% (16.6-33.2%) and 5.9% (2.4-11.6%) in the control group (P=0.937; P=0.771). The 3-year cumulative incidences of CMV-DNAemia and CMV-associated diseases were 56.0% (45.6-65.1%) and 8.0% (3.7-14.4%) in the sorafenib group, and 52.9% (42.7-62.1%) and 8.8% (4.3-15.3%) in the control group (P=0.997; P=0.826). The 3-year cumulative mortality of EBV- and CMV-associated diseases was 0.0% (0.0-0.0%) and 2.0% (0.4-6.4%) in the sorafenib group, and 1.0% (0.1-4.8%) and 2.0% (0.4-6.3%) in the control group (P=0.322, P=0.980). The 3-year cumulative incidences of relapse, NRM, OS, LFS, and GRFS were 13.0%, 11.1%, 79.0%, 75.9%, and 65.8% in the sorafenib group and 34.8%, 12.7%, 61.4%, 52.5%, and 46.6% in the control group, respectively (P<0.001, P=0.656, P=0.005, P<0.001, P=0.003). The reconstitution of T lymphocyte subsets, B lymphocytes, and natural killer cells was similar between the two groups (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Sorafenib maintenance post-transplantation does not increase the incidence and mortality of EBV and CMV infections, demonstrating a favorable safety profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02474290 . Registered on June 14, 2015.

FLT3-inhibitor therapy for prevention and treatment of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

The curative potential of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relies on the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL)-effect. Relapse after allo-HCT occurs in a considerable proportion of patients, and has a dismal prognosis with very limited curative potential, especially for patients with FLT-ITD-mutated AML. Since the first description of sorafenib for treatment of FLT3-ITD-mutated AML, several clinical trials have tried to determine the efficacy of FLT3 inhibitors for preventing and treating AML relapse after allo-HSCT, but many questions regarding differences among compounds and mechanisms of action remain unanswered. This review provides an overview on the established and evolving use of FLT3 inhibitors to prevent or treat relapse of AML in the context of allo-HCT, focusing on the recently discovered immunogenic potential of some FLT3 inhibitors and addressing the possible mechanisms of leukemia drug-escape.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: a meta-analysis

Identification of pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) candidates to receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in first complete remission (CR1) is still a matter of debate. Currently, transplantation is reserved to patients considered at high risk of relapse based on cytogenetics, molecular biology, and minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment. However, no randomized clinical trial exists in the literature comparing transplantation with other types of consolidation therapy. Here, we provide an up-to-date meta-analysis of studies comparing allo-HSCT in CR1 with chemotherapy alone as a post-remission treatment in high-risk pediatric AML. The literature search strategy identified 10 cohorts from 9 studies performing as-treated analysis. The quantitative synthesis showed improved overall survival (OS) (relative risk, 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.24; P = 0.0006) and disease-free survival (relative risk, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.17-1.47; P = 0.0001) in the allo-HSCT group, with increased relapse rate in the chemotherapy group (relative risk, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.07-1.49; P = 0.006). Sensitivity analysis including prospective studies alone and excluding studies that reported the comparison only on intermediate-risk patients confirmed the benefit of allo-HSCT on OS. Further research should focus on individualizing allo-HSCT indications based on molecular stratification and MRD monitoring.