Comparison of the Effects of Sufentanil and Fentanyl Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia after Lumbar Fusion

Low-dose sufentanil does not affect tolerance to LBNP-induced central hypovolemia or blood pressure responses during a cold pressor test

Hemorrhage is a leading cause of death in the prehospital setting. Since trauma-induced pain often accompanies a hemorrhagic insult, the administered pain medication must not interfere with critical autonomic regulation of arterial blood pressure and vital organ perfusion. The purpose of this study was to test two unrelated hypotheses: 1) sublingual sufentanil (Dsuvia) impairs tolerance to progressive central hypovolemia and 2) sublingual sufentanil attenuates pain sensation and the accompanying cardiovascular responses to a noxious stimulus. Twenty-nine adults participated in this double-blinded, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled trial. After sublingual administration of sufentanil (30 μg) or placebo, participants completed a progressive lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) challenge to tolerance (aim 1). After a recovery period, participants completed a cold pressor test (CPT; aim 2). Addressing the first aim, tolerance to LBNP was not different between trials (P = 0.495). Decreases in systolic blood pressure from baseline to the end of LBNP also did not differ between trials (time P < 0.001, trial P = 0.477, interaction P = 0.587). Finally, increases in heart rate from baseline to the end of LBNP did not differ between trials (time P < 0.001, trial P = 0.626, interaction P = 0.424). Addressing the second aim, sufentanil attenuated perceived pain (P < 0.001) in response to the CPT, though the magnitude of the change in mean blood pressure during the CPT (P = 0.078) was not different between trials. These data demonstrate that sublingual sufentanil does not impair tolerance to progressive central hypovolemia. Additionally, sublingual sufentanil attenuates perceived pain, but not the accompanying mean blood pressure responses to the CPT.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Addressing two unique aims, we observed that sublingual sufentanil administration does not impair tolerance or cardiovascular responses to lower-body negative pressure (LBNP)-induced progressive central hypovolemia. Second, despite pain perception being reduced, sublingual sufentanil did not attenuate mean blood pressure responses to a cold pressor test (CPT).

Sufentanil Suppresses Cell Carcinogenesis Via Targeting miR-186-5p/HMGB1 Axis and Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Sufentanil is a common opioid anesthetic agent, which exerts anti-cancer properties in several cancer types. However, its action mechanisms in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are unclear. Therefore, the present study investigated the pharmacological effect of sufentanil on miRNAs in NSCLC treatment. In this study, after treatment with sufentanil, the proliferation, migration, invasion and apoptosis of A549 and H1299 NSCLC cell lines were measured by cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay, colony formation assay, transwell assays and flow cytometry. Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was utilized to detect the expression of miR-186-5p and high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1), and their interaction was analyzed using luciferase reporter assay. The proteins of HMGB1, and apoptosis- and Wnt/β-catenin pathway-related factors were detected by western blot. It was demonstrated that sufentanil significantly upregulated miR‑186‑5p to restrict NSCLC cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and boost apoptosis in vitro. Mechanically, miR-186-5p interacted with HMGB1 and negatively regulated HMGB1 in NSCLC cells. Furthermore, rescue assay showed that sufentanil exerted antitumor activities by upregulating miR-186-5p, which targeted HMGB1 and restrained Wnt/β-catenin signal pathway in NSCLC cells. In conclusion, these results suggested that sufentanil disrupts the oncogenicity of NSCLC cells by regulating miR-186-5p/HMGB1/β-catenin axis, providing a promising implication for the anti-oncogenic effect of sufentanil.

Comparisons of fentanyl and sufentanil on recovery time after inguinal hernia repair in children: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair is a common pediatric procedure. We studied postoperative recovery times in children undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with anesthesia induced by fentanyl versus sufentanil.

METHODS

We performed a pilot randomized clinical trial between February and December 2022. Eligible children were assigned into two age groups, 2-6 and 6-12 years old groups. Then, children in each age group were randomly assigned into either the fentanyl (2 µg/kg) or sufentanil (0.2 µg/kg) group for anesthesia induction. Baseline characteristics were collected. The primary outcome was the postoperative recovery time, which was recorded as the time period from extubation to a Steward recovery score reaching 6. Secondary outcomes included surgical duration, anesthetic duration, intubation duration, and intraoperative hemorrhage.

RESULTS

There were 300 children, with 75 children in each group. In the 2-6 years old group, children who received fentanyl had statistically significantly shorter postoperative recovery times than children who received sufentanil (0.9 ± 0.4 versus 1.5 ± 0.3 h, P < 0.001). However, in the 6-12 years old group, children who received fentanyl had statistically significantly longer postoperative recovery times than children who received sufentanil (1.2 ± 0.4 versus 0.8 ± 0.4 h, P < 0.001). Baseline characteristics and secondary outcomes were comparable between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Anesthesia induction with fentanyl or sufentanil resulted in different postoperative recovery times after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children in different age groups. More studies are required to determine the appropriate induction anesthetic in children of different ages.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was retrospectively registered online at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number ChiCTR2300072177, retrospectively registered on 06/06/2023).

Analysis of Stress Response and Analgesic Effect of Remazolam Combined with Etomidate in Painless Gastroenteroscopy

In order to explore more ideal intravenous anesthesia drug in clinical practice, the analgesic effect of remazolam combined with etomidate in painless gastroenteroscopy and its effect on stress response is investigated. A total of 100 patients are selected for the gastric disease screening, and they are randomly divided into the single-drug group and composite group, with 50 cases in each group. Etomidate, mazzolone, and etomidate are used to anesthetize the patients, and then, the effects of different solutions on analgesia, sedation, and stress response are compared and analyzed, and the adverse reactions are improved. The etomidate and red horse azole shimron composite etomidate anesthesia were applied, and the comparative analysis of different solutions of analgesic, sedative effect, and response to stress is conducted. Then, the improvement of adverse reactions is analyzed. The experimental results demonstrate that remazolam combined with etomidate anesthesia can reduce the level of pain mediators and enhance the analgesia and sedation effect. Meanwhile, combined anesthesia can reduce the stress response and adverse reactions of patients and shorten the examination period effectively.

Sufentanil ameliorates oxygen‑glucose deprivation/reoxygenation‑induced endothelial barrier dysfunction in HCMECs via the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway

Ischemic heart disease, a chronic myocardial damage disease caused by coronary artery ischemia, is the leading cause of death worldwide. The aim of the present study was to explore the efficacy of sufentanil in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Oxygen and glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R) was utilized to induce human cardiac microvascular endothelial cells (HCMECs) to simulate myocardial I/R injury in vitro. The Cell Counting Kit-8 assay was used to detect the effects of sufentanil on HCMECs and OGD/R-induced HCMECs. The TUNEL, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, immunofluorescence and in vitro permeability assays, were used to assess apoptosis, LDH activity, VE-cadherin protein expression levels and endothelial barrier function in OGD/R-induced HCMECs, respectively. Moreover, western blotting was performed to assess the protein expression levels of apoptosis, endothelial barrier function and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt)-related proteins. The results demonstrated that sufentanil had no significant influence on the viability of HCMECs but increased the viability of OGD/R-induced HCMECs in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, sufentanil inhibited cell apoptosis and permeability of OGD/R-induced HCMECs but enhanced the protein expression levels of tight junction proteins, including ZO-1, Occludin, VE-cadherin and Claudin-5. Sufentanil was also demonstrated to activate the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. In addition, the use of LY294002, an inhibitor of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, partially abolished the protective effects of sufentanil on apoptosis, permeability and tight junction protein expression levels. These results indicated that sufentanil ameliorated OGD/R-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction in HCMECs, potentially via the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. The present study therefore suggested that sufentanil may serve as a novel therapeutic option for the improvement of myocardial I/R injury.

Effectiveness of Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA) with Sufentanil Background Infusion for Post-Cesarean Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

To investigate the effectiveness of sufentanil patient-controlled intravenous analgesia pump (PCIA) and background infusion in patients of post-cesarean analgesia.

Patients and Methods

This trial compared two groups of women undergoing cesarean section and receiving PCIA: no background infusion group (n=30), 6-min lockout time, and background infusion group (n=30), 2 mL/h infusion, 10-min lockout time. Both groups with 2 μg/kg sufentanil was diluted to 100 mL with normal saline. VAS scores at rest at 36 h was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints were the VAS scores at rest at 6, 12, and 24 h, the total amount of sufentanil consumed, the Ramsay sedation score (RSS) assessed at the same time points, postpartum bleeding within 24 h, the injection/attempt (I/A) ratio, BP and HR, PONV, side effects of sufentanil.

Results

Compared with the no background infusion group, the background infusion group showed lower VAS pain scores at 6, 12, and 24 h (P<0.01), but no differences at 36 h (95% CI = -0.5-0.8. P>0.05). Attempts, injections, and total sufentanil consumption were significantly different between the two groups (P<0.001), but without difference in I/A. Bleeding was less in the background infusion group at 1 h (P=0.03). The minimal respiration rates were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusion

Background infusion increased the total consumption of sufentanil within 36 h after cesarean section. Although it did not reduce uterine contraction pain and wound pain at 36 h, it significantly reduced the pain at 6, 12, and 24 h after cesarean section. It improved patient satisfaction and reduced the amount of bleeding after 1 h. Importantly, it did not increase the incidence of hypertension, PONV and respiratory depression.

The Optimizing Background Infusion Mode Decreases Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesic Volume and Opioid Consumption Compared to Fixed-Rate Background Infusion in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study

Background and objectives: The fixed-rate continuous background infusion mode with bolus dosing is a common modality for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). However, some patients suffer from inadequate analgesia or opioid-related adverse effects due to the biphasic pattern of postoperative pain. Therefore, we investigated the postoperative analgesic efficacy of PCA using an optimizing background infusion mode (OBIM) where the background injection rate varies depending on the patient’s bolus demand. Materials and Methods: We prospectively enrolled 204 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Patients were allocated to either the optimizing (group OBIM) or the traditional background infusion group (group TBIM). The numeric rating scale (NRS) score for pain was evaluated at admission to and discharge from the recovery room, as well as at the 6th, 24th, and 48th postoperative hours. Data on bolus demand count, total infused volume, and background infusion rate were downloaded from the PCA device at 30-min intervals until the 48th postoperative hour. Results: The NRS score was not significantly different between groups throughout the postoperative period (p = 0.621), decreasing with time in both groups (p < 0.001). The bolus demand count was not significantly different between groups throughout (p = 0.756). The mean total cumulative infused PCA volume was lower in group OBIM (84.0 (95% confidence interval: 78.9−89.1) mL) than in group TBIM (102 (97.8−106.0) mL; p < 0.001). The total cumulative opioid dose in fentanyl equivalents, after converting sufentanil to fentanyl using an equipotential dose ratio, was lower in group OBIM (714.1 (647.4−780.9) μg) than in group TBIM (963.7 (870.5−1056.9) μg); p < 0.001). The background infusion rate was significantly different between groups throughout the study period (p < 0.001); it was higher in group OBIM than in group TBIM before the 12th postoperative hour and lower from the 18th to the 48th postoperative hour. Conclusions: The OBIM combined with bolus dosing reduces the cumulative PCA volume and opioid consumption compared to the TBIM combined with bolus dosing, while yielding comparable postoperative analgesia and bolus demand in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Comparison of the Effects of Sufentanil and Fentanyl on Postoperative Sleep Quality of Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy and Adenotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

The primary purpose was to compare the effects of sufentanil and fentanyl on the postoperative sleep quality. And the secondary purposes were to evaluate perioperative hemodynamics, postoperative pain and complications of children undergoing tonsillectomy and adenotomy.

METHODS

Seventy-six patients were randomly assigned to the sufentanil or fentanyl group. The subjective sleep quality was assessed by the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) on the night before surgery (Sleep preop 1), the first night after surgery (Sleep POD 1), and the third night after surgery (Sleep POD 3). The Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) was used to evaluate the postoperative pain level 24 hours after surgery. The Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (OAA/S) scale was used to assess the level of sedation in children. Perioperative hemodynamics and adverse effects were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The AIS score in the sufentanil group was significantly lower at Sleep POD 1 and Sleep POD 3 (P < 0.001, respectively). Children in the sufentanil group had significantly lower FPS-R scores at 2, 4, and 6 hours after surgery (P = 0.004, P = 0.004, and P = 0.001, respectively). The intraoperative hemodynamic parameters were more stable (P < 0.05, respectively) and the OAA/S scores at 2 hours after surgery were lower in the sufentanil group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting between the two groups (P = 0.435).

CONCLUSION

Children undergoing tonsillectomy and adenotomy after general anesthesia who received sufentanil had better postoperative sleep quality and less postoperative pain at 2, 4, and 6 hours post operation. Moreover, children who received sufentanil showed better hemodynamic stability during surgery. Therefore, sufentanil should be considered as a better choice to facilitate rapid recovery in children following tonsillectomy and adenotomy.

Effects of different sufentanil target concentrations on the MACBAR of sevoflurane in patients with carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum stimulus

BACKGROUND

This study aims to observe the effects of different target controlled plasma sufentanil concentrations on the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane for blocking adrenergic response (BAR) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum stimulation.

METHODS

Eighty-five patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, aged 30-65 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II, were enrolled in this study. All the patients were randomly divided into 5 groups (S₀, S₁, S₂, S₃, S₄) with different sufentanil plasma target concentration (0.0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 ng ml^- 1). Anesthesia was induced by inhalation of 8% sevoflurane in 100% oxygen, and 0.6 mg kg^- 1 of rocuronium was intravenously injected to facilitate the insertion of a laryngeal mask airway. The end-tidal sevoflurane concentration and sufentanil plasma target concentration were adjusted according to respective preset value in each group. The hemodynamic response to pneumoperitoneum stimulus was observed after the end-tidal sevoflurane concentration had been maintained stable at least for 15 min. The MAC_BAR of sevoflurane was measured by a sequential method. Meanwhile, epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE) concentrations in the blood were also determined before and after pneumoperitoneum stimulus in each group.

RESULTS

When the method of independent paired reversals was used, the MAC_BAR of sevoflurane in groups S₀, S₁, S₂, S₃, S₄ was 5.333% (confidence interval [CI] 95%: 5.197-5.469%), 4.533% (95% CI: 4.451-4.616%), 2.861% (95% CI: 2.752-2.981%), 2.233% (95% CI: 2.142-2.324%) and 2.139% (95% CI: 2.057-2.219%), respectively. Meanwhile, when the isotonic regression analysis was used, the MAC_BAR of sevoflurane in groups S₀, S₁, S₂, S₃, S₄ was 5.329% (95% CI: 5.321-5.343%), 4.557% (95% CI: 4.552-4.568%), 2.900% (95% CI: 2.894-2.911%), 2.216% (95% CI: 2.173-2.223%) and 2.171% (95% CI: 2.165-2.183%), respectively. The MAC_BAR was not significantly different between groups S₃ and S₄ when using 0.5 and 0.7 ng ml^- 1 of sufentanil plasma target concentrations. No significant difference was found in the change of E or NE concentration between before and after pneumoperitoneum stimulation in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

The MAC_BAR of sevoflurane can be decreased with increasing sufentanil plasma target concentrations. A ceiling effect of the decrease occurred at a sufentanil plasma target concentration of 0.5 ng ml^- 1. When the sympathetic adrenergic response was inhibited in half of the patients to pneumoperitoneum stimulation in each group, the changes of E and NE concentrations showed no significant differences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn ( ChiCTR1800015819 , 23, April, 2018).

Comparison of the Effects of Sufentanil and Fentanyl in Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia after Pediatric Moyamoya Surgery: A Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been one of the most popular modalities for postoperative pain management in orthopedic surgery, plastic surgery, or neurosurgery in children.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the effects of fentanyl and sufentanil used in intravenous PCA on postoperative pain management and opioid-related side effects in pediatric moyamoya disease.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 97 pediatric patients who underwent surgery for moyamoya disease. Preoperative and perioperative parameters were assessed. The PCA regimen was as follows: fentanyl group (0.2 μg/kg/mL, 1 mL of loading volume, 0.1 μg/kg/h of basal infusion, a bolus of 0.2 μg/kg on demand, "lock-out" interval of 15 min); sufen-tanil group (0.04 μg/kg/mL, 1 mL of loading volume, 0.02 μg/kg/h of basal infusion, a bolus of 0.04 μg/kg on demand, 15 min lock-out), 10 μg/kg (up to 300 μg) of ramosetron for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting with the same loading dose in both groups. Peripheral nerve blocks were performed. Pain was assessed by numeric rating scale or revised Faces Pain Scale. Side effects were reviewed.

RESULTS

The two groups showed similar pain scores and incidence of nausea or vomiting during the first 48 h postoperatively. Additional analgesics were more frequent in the fentanyl group, and PCA was discontinued more frequently in the sufentanil group.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperatively, sufen-tanil in PCA provided more analgesia than fentanyl with less additional analgesics in moyamoya disease. However, PCA with sufentanil was more frequently discontinued due to nausea or vomiting compared to fentanyl-based PCA.

Comparison of Sufentanil- and Fentanyl-based Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting after Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: A Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized-controlled Trial

Background: The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remains high. The effects of sufentanil for PONV is not firmly confirmed. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of sufentanil- and fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) on the incidence of PONV after laparoscopic nephrectomy. Methods: Eighty-six patients were randomly allocated to receive either the sufentanil (n =43) or fentanyl (n =43). IV-PCA was prepared using either sufentanil 3 µg/kg or fentanyl 20 µg/kg, ramosetron 0.3 mg, and ketorolac 120 mg. The primary outcome of was the incidence of PONV during 24 h after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge. The secondary outcomes were the modified Rhodes index and patient satisfaction scores at 24 h after PACU discharge, need for rescue antiemetics, pain score, need for additional analgesics, and cumulative consumption of IV-PCA Results: The incidence of PONV was comparable between the sufentanil and fentanyl groups (64.3% vs. 65%, p = 0.946; respectively). The number of patients who required antiemetics (p = 0.946) and the modified Rhodes index at 24 h after post-anesthesia care unit discharge (p = 0.668) were also comparable in both groups. No significant differences were found in the secondary outcomes, including the analgesic profiles and adverse events between the groups. Conclusions: In conclusion, sufentanil- and fentanyl-based IV-PCA showed similar incidence of PONV with comparable analgesic effects after laparoscopic nephrectomy. Based on these results, we suggest that sufentanil and fentanyl may provide comparable effects for IV-PCA after laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine combined with tramadol for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in Chinese surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) has been suggested as an effective method of pain relief. There are several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of dexmedetomidine (DEX) combined with tramadol for PCIA in Chinese surgical patients. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DEX combined with tramadol for PCIA in Chinese surgical patients from current data.

METHODS

The RCTs of DEX combined with tramadol for PCIA were gathered from the PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, and VIP databases. After data extraction and quality assessment of the included RCTs, RevMan 5.3 software was employed for the meta-analysis of visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Ramsay sedation scores, effective pressure times for PCIA, tramadol consumption, and safety.

RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs were included. Compared with tramadol alone, postoperative intravenous tramadol-DEX combination PCA led to lower VAS scores (weighted mean differences [WMD]12h = 0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] v1.50 to 1.79; WMD24h = 0.78, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.62; WMD48h = 0.51, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.38; all P < .05), lower Ramsay sedation scores (WMD24h = 0.08, 95% CI -0.14 to -0.02; WMD48h = 0.09, 95% CI -0.11 to -0.07; all P < .05), and less postoperative tramadol consumption (WMD0-24h = -102.59 mg, 95% CI -149.68 to -55.49; WMD0-48h = -152.91 mg, 95% CI -259.93 to -45.89; all P < .05). With regard to safety, there was a significant difference between DEX-tramadol and tramadol for PCIA in terms of the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, dizziness, chills, and restlessness (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION

According to the domestic evidence, this systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that DEX-tramadol PCIA is superior to tramadol in terms of analgesic efficacy and safety for Chinese surgical patients. However, because of some clear limitations (sample size and heterogeneity), these results should be interpreted with caution. Further large-scale and well-designed studies are needed to summarize and analyze the data to draw a more convincing conclusion.

Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Sufentanil versus Fentanyl in Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Double-blind, Prospective Study

Background: Fentanyl is one of the most widely used opioids for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). Sufentanil, a fentanyl analog, is suitable for postoperative pain control because it has no active metabolites and shows a higher therapeutic index and lower frequency of respiratory suppression than fentanyl. This study aimed to compare the two opioids for postoperative pain relief on the basis of analgesic efficacy, adverse effects, and patient satisfaction. Methods: Sixty-four patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomly allocated into a fentanyl group (n = 31) or a sufentanil group (n = 33). The patients received 50-μg fentanyl or 10-μg sufentanil before induction of anesthesia and 5 minutes after uterine incision during surgery in the fentanyl and sufentanil group, respectively. After arriving at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), verbal pain score (VPS) and sedation score were assessed. IV-PCA (fentanyl 1250 μg or sufentanil 250 μg with ondansetron 8 mg; total volume, 60 ml) was connected and continued for 48 h postoperatively. Postoperative pain was evaluated by using the numeric rating scale (NRS; at rest/during cough) at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after surgery. The cumulative PCA consumption, patient satisfaction scores, and adverse effects were measured. Results: In the PACU, VPS was significantly higher and rescue fentanyl consumption was higher in the fentanyl group than in the sufentanil group, while the sedation score and adverse effects were comparable between the groups. No significant differences were observed in the NRS scores for pain (at rest/during cough) in the ward over 48 hours postoperatively, but the cumulative PCA consumption was significantly higher in the fentanyl group (47.4 ± 9.9 ml vs. 36.2 ± 14.6 ml, P = 0.01). There were no significant intergroup differences in patient satisfaction score and the incidence of adverse effects in the ward, except for a higher incidence of dry mouth in the fentanyl group. Conclusions: In comparison with fentanyl, sufentanil showed comparable analgesic efficacy and safety with less analgesic consumption (under a potency ratio of 1:5) in IV-PCA after total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Therefore, we suggest that sufentanil can be a useful alternative to fentanyl for IV-PCA.

[Efficacy of erector spinae block versus retrolaminar block for postoperative analgesia following posterior lumbar surgery]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block for relieving acute pain after posterior lumbar surgery.

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients undergoing selective posterior lumbar surgery under general anesthesia in our hospital between January and December, 2018, were recruited. Of these patients, 30 received total intravenous general anesthesia to serve as the control group, 28 received total intravenous general anesthesia (TIVA) combined with erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and 31 had TIVA combined with retrolaminar block (RLB). All the patients received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) for postoperative analgesia, and their heart rate, blood pressure, and pulse oximetry were routinely monitored during the anesthesia. VAS scores were evaluated before and at 2, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h after the surgery. Sufentanil consumption during the operation and PCIA were also recorded. The postoperative complications such as nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, itching and respiratory depression within 48 h after the surgery were also recorded.

RESULTS

At 2, 8 and 12 h postoperatively, VAS scores in the ESPB group and RLB group were significantly lower than those in the control group; the scores were significantly lower in RLB group than in ESPB group (P &lt; 0.05). Compared with that in the control group, sufentanil consumption during the operation and PCIA were significantly decreased in both ESPB and RLB groups, particularly in the latter group (P &lt; 0.05). Two patients experienced nausea and vomiting and 1 patient complained of pruritus in control group; 1 patient had over sedation and 1 had urinary retention in ESPB group; 1 patient had urinary retention in RLB group.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided RLB has better analgesic effect than ESPB for management of perioperative pain following posterior lumbar surgery.

Novel multimodal analgesia regimen improves post-TACE pain in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUD

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the primary palliative treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it is often accompanied by postoperative pain which hinder patient recovery. This study was to examine whether preemptive parecoxib and sufentanil-based patient controlled analgesia (PCA) could improve the pain management in patients receiving TACE for inoperable HCC.

METHODS

From June to December 2016, 84 HCC patients undergoing TACE procedure were enrolled. Because of the willingness of the individuals, it is difficult to randomize the patients to different groups. We matched the patients' age, gender and pain scores, and divided the patients into the multimodal group (n = 42) and control group (n = 42). Patients in the multimodal group received 40 mg of parecoxib, 30 min before TACE, followed by 48 h of sufentanil-based PCA. Patients in the control group received a routine analgesic regimen, i.e., 5 mg of dezocine during operation, and 100 mg of tramadol or equivalent intravenous opioid according to patient's complaints and pain intensity. Postoperative pain intensity, percentage of patients as per the pain category, adverse reaction, duration of hospital stay, cost-effectiveness, and patient's satisfaction were all taken into consideration when evaluated.

RESULTS

Compared to the control group, the visual analogue scale scores for pain intensity was significantly lower at 2, 4, 6, and 12 h (all P < 0.05) in the multimodal group and a noticeably lower prevalence of post-operative nausea and vomiting in the multimodal group (31.0% vs. 59.5%). Patient's satisfaction in the multimodal group was also significantly higher than that in the control group (95.2% vs. 69.0%). No significant difference was observed in the duration of hospital stay between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Preemptive parecoxib and sufentanil-based multimodal analgesia regime is a safe, efficient and cost-effective regimen for postoperative pain control in HCC patients undergoing TACE.

Compatibility and stability of dezocine and tropisetron in 0.9% sodium chloride injection for patient-controlled analgesia administration

Tropisetron is an adjuvant for dezocine used in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and has been reported to provide superior pain control. It is efficacious in reducing the institutional incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), which decreases resource utilization and cost. However, no scientific evidence has been reported in the literature demonstrating analytical confirmation of the compatibility and stability of the combination of dezocine and tropisetron. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the stability of dezocine with tropisetron in 0.9% sodium chloride injection form for PCA administration.Commercial solutions of dezocine and tropisetron were combined and examined for compatibility and stability when diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride injection in polyolefin bags and glass bottles stored at 4°C or 25°C for up to 14 days. The initial concentrations were 40 mg/100 mL dezocine and 5 mg/100 mL tropisetron. For all samples, the compatibility parameters (including precipitation, cloudiness, discoloration, and pH values) were evaluated. Chemical stability was also determined using high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) analysis.After a 14-day period of storage at 4°C or 25°C, the initial concentrations of dezocine and tropisetron were maintained at at least 98%. All of the mixtures remained clear and colorless throughout the observation period, and no color change or precipitation was observed.These results indicated that admixtures of 40 mg/100 mL dezocine and 5 mg/100 mL tropisetron in 0.9% sodium chloride injection were stable for at least 14 days when stored in polyolefin bags or glass bottles at 4°C or 25°C and protected from light.

Efficacy and Safety of Transdermal Buprenorphine versus Oral Tramadol/Acetaminophen in Patients with Persistent Postoperative Pain after Spinal Surgery

PURPOSE

Control of persistent pain following spinal surgery is an unmet clinical need. This study compared the efficacy and safety of buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) to oral tramadol/acetaminophen (TA) in Korean patients with persistent, moderate pain following spinal surgery.

METHODS

Open-label, interventional, randomized multicenter study. Adults with persistent postoperative pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] ≥ 4 at 14-90 days postsurgery) were enrolled. Patients received once-weekly BTDS (n = 47; 5 μg/h titrated to 20 μg/h) or twice-daily TA (n = 40; tramadol 37.5 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg, one tablet titrated to 4 tablets) for 6 weeks. The study compared pain reduction with BTDS versus TA at week 6. Quality of life (QoL), treatment satisfaction, medication compliance, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed.

FINDINGS

At week 6, both groups reported significant pain reduction (mean NRS change: BTDS -2.02; TA -2.76, both P < 0.0001) and improved QoL (mean EQ-5D index change: BTDS 0.10; TA 0.19, both P < 0.05). The BTDS group achieved better medication compliance (97.8% versus 91.0%). Incidence of AEs (26.1% versus 20.0%) and adverse drug reactions (20.3% versus 16.9%) were comparable between groups.

IMPLICATIONS

For patients with persistent pain following spinal surgery, BTDS is an alternative to TA for reducing pain and supports medication compliance. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01983111.